Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Rule 8.600-E Relating to Certain Generic Listing Standards for Managed Fund Shares, 48474-48475 [2018-20769]
Download as PDF
48474
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Notices
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
II. Further Information
The NRC seeks public comment on
the proposed SRP-draft section revision
of Section 14.3.3, ‘‘Piping Systems and
Components—Inspections, Tests,
Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria.’’
This re-notice includes revisions
initiated by the staff to address editorial
issues and provide further clarification
on particular issues. This revision
supersedes the previous revision issued
on September 11, 2017, and the staff
will not be addressing previously
submitted comments. Following NRC
staff evaluation of public comments, the
NRC intends to finalize SRP Section
14.3.3, Revision 1 in ADAMS and post
it on the NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The
SRP is guidance for the NRC staff. The
SRP is not a substitute for the NRC
regulations, and compliance with the
SRP is not required.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this draft SRP, if finalized,
would not constitute backfitting as
defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit
Rule), or otherwise be inconsistent with
the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52. The staff’s position is based
upon the following considerations.
1. The draft SRP positions, if
finalized, do not constitute backfitting,
inasmuch as the SRP is guidance
directed to the NRC staff with respect to
its regulatory responsibilities.
The SRP provides interim guidance to
the staff on how to review an
application for NRC regulatory approval
in the form of licensing. Changes in staff
guidance intended for use by only the
staff are not matters that constitute
backfitting as that term is defined in 10
CFR 50.109(a)(1) or involve the issue
finality provisions of 10 CFR part 52.
2. Backfitting and issue finality—with
certain exceptions discussed below—do
not apply to current or future
applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants
are not, with certain exceptions, the
subject of either the Backfit Rule or any
issue finality provisions under 10 CFR
part 52. This is because neither the
Backfit Rule nor the issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52 were
intended to apply to every NRC action
which substantially changes the
expectations of current and future
applicants.
The exceptions to this general
principle are applicable whenever a 10
CFR part 50 operating license applicant
references a construction permit or a 10
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Sep 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
CFR part 52 combined license applicant
references a license (e.g., an early site
permit) and/or an NRC regulatory
approval (e.g., a design certification
rule) for which specified issue finality
provisions apply.
The NRC staff does not currently
intend to impose the positions
represented in the draft SRP section in
a manner that constitutes backfitting or
is inconsistent with any issue finality
provision in 10 CFR part 52. If in the
future the NRC staff seeks to impose a
position stated in this draft SRP section
in a manner that would constitute
backfitting or be inconsistent with these
issue finality provisions, the NRC staff
must make the showing as set forth in
the Backfit Rule or address the
regulatory criteria for set forth in the
applicable issue finality provision, as
applicable, that would allow the staff to
impose the position.
3. The staff has no intention to
impose the draft SRP positions on
existing nuclear power plant licenses
either now or in the future (absent a
voluntary request for a change from the
licensee, holder of a regulatory
approval, or a design certification
applicant).
The NRC staff does not intend to
impose or apply the positions described
in this draft SRP section to existing
(already issued) licenses (e.g., operating
licenses and combined licenses) and
regulatory approvals. Hence, this draft
SRP guidance—even if considered
guidance subject to the Backfit rule or
the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52—need not be evaluated as if it
were a backfit or as being inconsistent
with these issue finality provisions. If,
in the future, the NRC staff seeks to
impose a position in this draft SRP
section on holders of already issued
licenses in a manner that would
constitute backfitting or does not
provide issue finality as described in the
applicable issue finality provision, then
the staff must make the showing as set
forth in the Backfit Rule or address the
criteria set forth in the applicable issue
finality provision, as applicable, that
would allow the staff to impose the
position.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of September 2018.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennivine K. Rankin,
Acting Chief, Licensing Branch 3, Division
of Licensing, Siting, and Environmental
Analysis, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2018–20826 Filed 9–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84195; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2018–54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Rule
8.600–E Relating to Certain Generic
Listing Standards for Managed Fund
Shares
September 19, 2018.
On July 18, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend Commentary .01 to
NYSE Arca Rule 8.600–E relating to
certain generic listing standards for
Managed Fund Shares. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on August 7,
2018.3 The Commission has received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is September 21,
2018. The Commission is extending this
45-day time period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,5 designates
November 5, 2018, as the date by which
the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83759
(August 1, 2018), 83 FR 38753.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 Id.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Notices
proposed rule change (File Number SR–
NYSEArca-2018–54).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–20769 Filed 9–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–84215; File No. SR–BX–
2018–044]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Conform the
Exchange’s By-Law Provisions
Regarding the Chief Regulatory Officer
to Those of Its Affiliate, Nasdaq PHLX
LLC
September 19, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 6, 2018, Nasdaq BX, Inc.
(‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to conform
the Exchange’s By-Law provisions
regarding the Chief Regulatory Officer to
those of its affiliate, Nasdaq PHLX LLC.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Sep 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
6 17
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
The Exchange proposes to amend its
By-Laws at Article V, Section 5.10 to
conform its provisions regarding the
Exchange’s Chief Regulatory Officer
(‘‘CRO’’) to those of its affiliate, Nasdaq
PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’).3 By-Law Article V,
Section 5.10 presently requires that an
officer of the Exchange 4 with the
position of Executive Vice President or
Senior Vice President be designated as
the CRO of the Exchange. The Exchange
now proposes to remove the
requirement that the CRO be an
Executive Vice President or Senior Vice
President of the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that this requirement
is unnecessary and notes that there may
be officers of the Exchange who are well
qualified to serve in the CRO role, but
who may not hold the position of an
Executive Vice President or Senior Vice
President.5 The Exchange does not seek
to amend any of the current
responsibilities of the CRO as set forth
in Section 5.10; 6 rather, the proposed
changes are intended to give the
Exchange more flexibility to attract and
retain well qualified officers to the role
of CRO that are not designated as an
Executive Vice President or Senior Vice
President of the Exchange. As noted
above, the Exchange desires to conform
the requirements to become CRO in its
By-Laws to those in the By-Laws of
Phlx, which do not contain a similar
restriction in Article IV, Section 4–7 of
its By-Laws that its CRO be an Executive
3 See Phlx By-Law Article IV, Section 4–7 (Chief
Regulatory Officer).
4 In Exhibit 5, the references to ‘‘Corporation’’
mean the Exchange.
5 The Exchange notes that Phlx’s CRO currently
holds the position of Vice President.
6 The CRO’s responsibilities include general
supervision of the regulatory operations of the
Exchange, including responsibility for overseeing
the Exchange’s surveillance, examination, and
enforcement functions and for administering any
regulatory services agreements with another SRO to
which the Exchange is a party. In addition, the CRO
shall meet with the Regulatory Oversight
Committee of the Exchange in executive session at
regularly scheduled meetings of such committee,
and at any time upon request of the CRO or any
member of the Regulatory Oversight Committee.
Unlike Phlx, the Exchange’s By-Laws provide that
the CRO may also serve as the General Counsel of
the Exchange. See By-Law Article V, Section 5.10.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48475
Vice President or Senior Vice President
of Phlx.7
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,9
in particular, in that it enables the
Exchange to be so organized so as to
have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act and to comply,
and to enforce compliance by its
members and persons associated with
its members, with the provisions of the
Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange. The Exchange also believes
that this proposal furthers the objectives
of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10 in
particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. The
proposed changes will remove the
requirement currently in Article V,
Section 5.10 of the Exchange’s By-Laws
that the CRO be an Executive Vice
President or Senior Vice President of the
Exchange. As discussed above, the
current responsibilities of the CRO as
provided in Article V, Section 5.10
remain unchanged under this proposal,
and the CRO will continue to have
general oversight of the regulatory
operations of the Exchange and be
obligated to meet regularly with the
Regulatory Oversight Committee. The
proposed rule change is intended to
provide the Exchange with greater
flexibility to attract and retain capable
individuals who are well qualified to
serve in the CRO role. In addition, the
proposed amendments will have the
additional benefit of bringing the
Exchange’s requirements on the CRO
role into greater conformity with those
of its affiliate, Phlx, thereby creating
equivalent standards among the
affiliated exchanges owned by Nasdaq,
Inc. (‘‘HoldCo’’).11 As such, the
Exchange believes that its proposal will
bring greater consistency to its rules,
which is beneficial to both investors and
the public interest.
7 See
note 5 above.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
11 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘NSM’’),
Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’), Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(‘‘GEMX’’), and Nasdaq MRX, LLC will file similar
proposals to conform their By-Laws with Phlx’s ByLaws. ISE, GEMX, MRX, NSM, BX, and Phlx will
hereinafter be referred to collectively as ‘‘Affiliated
Exchanges.’’
8 15
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48474-48475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20769]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-84195; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2018-54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Rule 8.600-E Relating to
Certain Generic Listing Standards for Managed Fund Shares
September 19, 2018.
On July 18, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Rule 8.600-E relating to certain
generic listing standards for Managed Fund Shares. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 7,
2018.\3\ The Commission has received no comments on the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83759 (August 1,
2018), 83 FR 38753.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is September 21, 2018. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ designates November 5, 2018, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove, the
[[Page 48475]]
proposed rule change (File Number SR-NYSEArca-2018-54).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20769 Filed 9-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P