Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain; Determination, 47938-47939 [2018-20549]

Download as PDF 47938 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 17, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–20536 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1098] Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Add Nokia of America Corporation as a Respondent U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 30) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) amending the complaint and notice of investigation to add Nokia of America Corporation as a respondent in the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom; Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas (collectively, ‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 3770 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The notice of investigation, as originally filed, named Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo, Finland; Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; NEC Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; NEC Networks & System Integration Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; and NEC Corporation of America of Irving, Texas as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party in this investigation. On March 19, 2018, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 9) to correct the name of respondent Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine Networks and terminate then respondents Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC from the investigation. The Commission determined not to review this ID. Notice (April 17, 2018). On July 10, 2018, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 21) to reflect the corporate name change of complainant Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd. The Commission determined not to review this ID. Notice (July 27, 2018). On August 27, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID amending the complaint and notice of investigation to add Nokia of America Corporation as a respondent in the investigation. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Nokia of America Corporation, of 600 Mountain Avenue, New Providence, New Jersey 07974– PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2008, is now a respondent in the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 17, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–20537 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681, and 682 (Fourth Review)] Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission further determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, Japan, and Spain would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30905) and determined on October 6, 2017 that it would conduct full reviews (82 FR 48527, October 17, 2017). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on March 23, 2018 (83 FR 12814). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2018, and all persons who requested the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on September 17, 2018. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4820 (September 2018), entitled Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681, and 682 (Fourth Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 17, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–20549 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [OMB Number 1140—NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Forensic Firearm Training Request for Non-ATF Employees—ATF Form 7110.15 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until November 20, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments, particularly with respect to the estimated public burden or associated response time, have suggestions, need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, or desire any additional information, please contact Sheila Hopkins, National Laboratory Center either by mail at 6000 Ammendale Road, Ammendale, MD 20705, by email at Sheila.hopkins@ atf.gov, or by telephone at 202–648– 6061. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection (check justification or form 83): New Collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Forensic Firearm Training Request for Non-ATF Employees. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form number (if applicable): ATF Form 7110.15. Component: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Federal Government. Other (if applicable): State, Local, or Tribal Government. Abstract: The Forensic Firearm Training Request for Non-ATF Employees (ATF F 7110.15) will be used to obtain information from Federal, State and local, and international law enforcement personnel to register, obtain course information, and/or evaluate ATF forensic firearms investigative techniques training. The information collected on the form will assist ATF to determine the applicant’s eligibility to attend this training. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: An estimated 75 respondents will utilize the form associated with this information collection (IC), and it will PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47939 take each respondent approximately 6 minutes minutes to complete the form. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The estimated annual public burden associated with this collection is 7.5 hours, which is equal to 75 (# of respondents) * 1 (# of responses per respondents) * .1 (6 minutes). If additional information is required contact: Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: September 17, 2018. Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2018–20526 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act On September 11, 2018, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire in the lawsuit entitled United States of America v. City of Manchester, New Hampshire, Civil Action No. 18–cv–00815. The United States’ Complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the Solid Waste Combustion provisions of the Clean Air Act and regulations applicable to certain sewage sludge incineration units. The consent decree requires the City of Manchester to perform injunctive relief and pay a civil penalty of $131,800. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Acting Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. City of Manchester, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1– 11620/1. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47938-47939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, and 682 (Fourth Review)]


Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain; 
Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless 
steel bar from India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission further determines 
that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar 
from Brazil, Japan, and Spain would not be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted these reviews on July 3, 2017 (82 FR 30905) and 
determined on October 6, 2017 that it would conduct full reviews (82 FR 
48527, October 17, 2017). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's 
reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was 
given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing 
the notice in the Federal Register on March 23, 2018 (83 FR 12814). The 
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2018, and all persons 
who requested the

[[Page 47939]]

opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on September 17, 2018. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4820 (September 2018), 
entitled Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain: 
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, and 682 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 17, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-20549 Filed 9-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P