Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Suspension of and Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule Regarding Connectivity Fees for Members and Non-Members, 47955-47957 [2018-20547]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–PEARL–2018–16 and should be submitted on or before October 12, 2018. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by October 26, 2018. VI. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,34 that File Number SR–PEARL–2018–16 be and hereby is, temporarily suspended. In addition, the Commission is instituting proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.35 Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–20545 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to increase its monthly network connectivity fees. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to increase the connectivity fee for connectivity to the Exchange’s primary/secondary facility from $1,100 to $1,400 for a 1 Gigabit (‘‘Gb’’) connection, from $5,500 to $6,100 for a 10Gb connection, and from $8,500 to $9,300 for a 10Gb ultra-low latency connection.7 In addition, the Exchange proposes to increase the network connectivity fees for connectivity to the Exchange’s disaster recovery facility from $500 to $550 for a 1Gb connection and from $2,500 to $2,750 for a 10Gb connection.8 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION III. Suspension of the Proposed Rule Change [Release No. 34–84175; File No. SR–MIAX– 2018–19] Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,9 at any time within 60 days of the date of filing of a proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,10 the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the change in the rules of a self-regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’) if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As discussed below, the Commission believes a temporary suspension of the proposed rule change is necessary and appropriate to allow for additional analysis of the proposed rule change’s consistency with the Act and the rules thereunder. As noted above, the Commission received one comment letter on the proposal.11 The commenter argues that the Exchange did not provide sufficient Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Suspension of and Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule Regarding Connectivity Fees for Members and Non-Members September 17, 2018. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 13, 2018.4 The Commission has received one comment letter on the proposal.5 Under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,6 the Commission is hereby: (i) Temporarily suspending the proposed rule change; and (ii) instituting proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change. I. Introduction On July 31, 2018, Miami International Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change (File Number SR–MIAX–2018–19) to amend the MIAX fee schedule to increase certain connectivity fees. The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.3 The proposed 34 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). CFR 200.30–3(a)(57) and (58). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 35 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83786 (August 7, 2018), 83 FR 40106 (‘‘Notice’’). 5 See Letter from Tyler Gellasch, Executive Director, The Healthy Markets Association, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated September 4, 2018 (‘‘Healthy Markets Letter’’). 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 7 See Notice, supra note 4 at 40106. 8 See id. 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 11 See Healthy Markets Letter, supra note 5. PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47955 information in its filing to support a finding that the proposal is consistent with the Act.12 Specifically, the commenter objects to the Exchange’s reliance on the fees of other exchanges to demonstrate that its fee increases are consistent with the Act. In addition, the commenter argues that the Exchange did not offer any details to support its basis for asserting that the proposed fee increases are consistent with the Act.13 The Exchange has not responded to the comment letter. When exchanges file their proposed rule changes with the Commission, including fee filings like the Exchange’s present proposal, they are required to provide a statement supporting the proposal’s basis under the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the exchange.14 The instructions to Form 19b–4, on which exchanges file their proposed rule changes, specify that such statement ‘‘should be sufficiently detailed and specific to support a finding that the proposed rule change is consistent with [those] requirements.’’ 15 Among other things, exchange proposed rule changes are subject to Section 6 of the Act, including Sections 6(b)(4), (5), and (8), which requires the rules of an exchange to (1) provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable fees among members, issuers, and other persons using the exchange’s facilities; 16 (2) perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers; 17 and (3) not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.18 In temporarily suspending the Exchange’s fee change, the Commission intends to further consider whether increasing certain connectivity fees to the Exchange is consistent with the statutory requirements applicable to a national securities exchange under the Act. In particular, the Commission will consider whether the proposed rule change satisfies the standards under the Act and the rules thereunder requiring, among other things, that an exchange’s rules provide for the equitable 12 See id. at 5. id. at 6–7, 12. 14 See 17 CFR 240.19b–4 (Item 3 entitled ‘‘SelfRegulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change’’). 15 Id. 16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 13 See E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 47956 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices allocation of reasonable fees among members, issuers, and other persons using its facilities; not permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers; and do not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.19 Therefore, the Commission finds that it is appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, and otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, to temporarily suspend the proposed rule changes.20 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES IV. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the Proposed Rule Change The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Sections 19(b)(3)(C) 21 and 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 22 to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, the Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide additional comment on the proposed rule change to inform the Commission’s analysis of whether to disapprove the proposed rule change. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,23 the Commission is providing notice of the grounds for possible disapproval under consideration: • Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange ‘‘provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities,’’ 24 • Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be ‘‘designed to perfect the operation of a free and open market and a national market system’’ and ‘‘protect investors and the public interest,’’ and not be ‘‘designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers,’’ 25 and 19 See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8), respectively. 20 For purposes of temporarily suspending the proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 21 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). Once the Commission temporarily suspends a proposed rule change, Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that the Commission institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) to determine whether a proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. 22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 23 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 24 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 25 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 • Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange ‘‘not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of [the Act].’’ 26 As noted above, the proposal increases connectivity fees for physical connections to the Exchange. The Exchange states that this fee increase would allow the Exchange to offset costs associated with providing and maintaining this technology.27 The commenter, among other concerns, asserts that the Exchange has not offered sufficient detail to support that the proposed fees are consistent with the Act and, in particular, whether the proposed fees are reasonable.28 Under the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the ‘‘burden to demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with the [Act] and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . is on the [SRO] that proposed the rule change.’’ 29 The description of a proposed rule change, its purpose and operation, its effect, and a legal analysis of its consistency with applicable requirements must all be sufficiently detailed and specific to support an affirmative Commission finding,30 and any failure of an SRO to provide this information may result in the Commission not having a sufficient basis to make an affirmative finding that a proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the applicable rules and regulations.31 The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional consideration and comment on the issues raised herein, including as to whether the proposed fees are consistent with the Act, and specifically, with its requirements that exchange fees be reasonable and equitably allocated; be designed to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and the national market system, protect investors and the public interest, and not be unfairly discriminatory; or not impose an unnecessary or inappropriate burden on competition.32 V. Commission’s Solicitation of Comments The Commission requests written views, data, and arguments with respect to the concerns identified above as well 26 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). Notice, supra note 4, at 40107. 28 See Healthy Markets Letter, supra note 5, at 6. 29 Rule 700(b)(3), Commission Rules of Practice, 17 CFR 201.700(b)(3). 30 See id. 31 See id. 32 See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8). 27 See PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 as any other relevant concerns. Such comments should be submitted by October 12, 2018. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by October 26, 2018. Although there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b–4, any request for an opportunity to make an oral presentation.33 The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency and merit of the Exchange’s statements in support of the proposal, in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit about the proposed rule change. Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the proposed rule change, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– MIAX–2018–19 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–2018–19. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 33 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Section 19(b)(2) of the Act grants the Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding—either oral or notice and opportunity for written comments—is appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal by an SRO. See Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975). E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2018 / Notices available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–2018–19 and should be submitted on or before October 12, 2018. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by October 26, 2018. VI. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,34 that File Number SR–MIAX–2018–19 be and hereby is, temporarily suspended. In addition, the Commission is instituting proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.35 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–20547 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #15696 and #15697; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number NC– 00099] Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of North Carolina U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA–4393–DR), dated 09/14/2018. Incident: Hurricane Florence. Incident Period: 09/07/2018 and continuing. DATES: Issued on 09/14/2018. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/13/2018. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/14/2019. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: 34 15 35 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). CFR 200.30–3(a)(57) and (58). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President’s major disaster declaration on 09/14/2018, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Beaufort, Brunswick, Carteret, Craven, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender. Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): North Carolina: Bladen, Columbus, Duplin, Hyde, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Pitt, Sampson, Washington. South Carolina: Horry. The Interest Rates are: Percent For Physical Damage: Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere .............. Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere .............. Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere ... Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... For Economic Injury: Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere .............. Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 4.000 2.000 7.350 3.675 2.500 2.500 3.675 2.500 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156968 and for economic injury is 156970. 47957 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #15696 and #15697; North Carolina Disaster Number NC–00099] Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the State of North Carolina U.S. Small Business Administration. AGENCY: ACTION: Amendment 1. This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA–4393–DR), dated 09/14/2018. Incident: Hurricane Florence. Incident Period: 09/07/2018 and continuing. SUMMARY: Issued on 09/17/2018. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/13/2018. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/14/2019. DATES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. ADDRESSES: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The notice of the President’s major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated 09/14/2018, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Bladen, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin, Harnett, Jones, Lenoir, Robeson, Sampson, Wayne. Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): North Carolina: Chatham, Greene, Hoke, Johnston, Lee, Moore, Scotland, Wake, Wilson. South Carolina: Dillon, Marlboro. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. [FR Doc. 2018–20593 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2018–20598 Filed 9–20–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025–01–P BILLING CODE 8025–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47955-47957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84175; File No. SR-MIAX-2018-19]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities 
Exchange LLC; Suspension of and Order Instituting Proceedings To 
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend the Fee Schedule Regarding Connectivity Fees for Members and Non-
Members

September 17, 2018.

I. Introduction

    On July 31, 2018, Miami International Securities Exchange LLC 
(``MIAX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change (File Number SR-MIAX-2018-19) to 
amend the MIAX fee schedule to increase certain connectivity fees. The 
proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the 
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The proposed 
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 
13, 2018.\4\ The Commission has received one comment letter on the 
proposal.\5\ Under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\6\ the Commission is 
hereby: (i) Temporarily suspending the proposed rule change; and (ii) 
instituting proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove 
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83786 (August 7, 
2018), 83 FR 40106 (``Notice'').
    \5\ See Letter from Tyler Gellasch, Executive Director, The 
Healthy Markets Association, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, 
Commission, dated September 4, 2018 (``Healthy Markets Letter'').
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to increase its 
monthly network connectivity fees. Specifically, the Exchange proposes 
to increase the connectivity fee for connectivity to the Exchange's 
primary/secondary facility from $1,100 to $1,400 for a 1 Gigabit 
(``Gb'') connection, from $5,500 to $6,100 for a 10Gb connection, and 
from $8,500 to $9,300 for a 10Gb ultra-low latency connection.\7\ In 
addition, the Exchange proposes to increase the network connectivity 
fees for connectivity to the Exchange's disaster recovery facility from 
$500 to $550 for a 1Gb connection and from $2,500 to $2,750 for a 10Gb 
connection.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice, supra note 4 at 40106.
    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Suspension of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\9\ at any time within 
60 days of the date of filing of a proposed rule change pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,\10\ the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend the change in the rules of a self-regulatory 
organization (``SRO'') if it appears to the Commission that such action 
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection 
of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 
As discussed below, the Commission believes a temporary suspension of 
the proposed rule change is necessary and appropriate to allow for 
additional analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with the 
Act and the rules thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the Commission received one comment letter on the 
proposal.\11\ The commenter argues that the Exchange did not provide 
sufficient information in its filing to support a finding that the 
proposal is consistent with the Act.\12\ Specifically, the commenter 
objects to the Exchange's reliance on the fees of other exchanges to 
demonstrate that its fee increases are consistent with the Act. In 
addition, the commenter argues that the Exchange did not offer any 
details to support its basis for asserting that the proposed fee 
increases are consistent with the Act.\13\ The Exchange has not 
responded to the comment letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Healthy Markets Letter, supra note 5.
    \12\ See id. at 5.
    \13\ See id. at 6-7, 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When exchanges file their proposed rule changes with the 
Commission, including fee filings like the Exchange's present proposal, 
they are required to provide a statement supporting the proposal's 
basis under the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable 
to the exchange.\14\ The instructions to Form 19b-4, on which exchanges 
file their proposed rule changes, specify that such statement ``should 
be sufficiently detailed and specific to support a finding that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with [those] requirements.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 17 CFR 240.19b-4 (Item 3 entitled ``Self-Regulatory 
Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, 
the Proposed Rule Change'').
    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Among other things, exchange proposed rule changes are subject to 
Section 6 of the Act, including Sections 6(b)(4), (5), and (8), which 
requires the rules of an exchange to (1) provide for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable fees among members, issuers, and other persons 
using the exchange's facilities; \16\ (2) perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, protect investors 
and the public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers; \17\ 
and (3) not impose any burden on competition not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In temporarily suspending the Exchange's fee change, the Commission 
intends to further consider whether increasing certain connectivity 
fees to the Exchange is consistent with the statutory requirements 
applicable to a national securities exchange under the Act. In 
particular, the Commission will consider whether the proposed rule 
change satisfies the standards under the Act and the rules thereunder 
requiring, among other things, that an exchange's rules provide for the 
equitable

[[Page 47956]]

allocation of reasonable fees among members, issuers, and other persons 
using its facilities; not permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers; and do not impose any burden on 
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes 
of the Act.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the Commission finds that it is appropriate in the 
public interest, for the protection of investors, and otherwise in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, to temporarily suspend the 
proposed rule changes.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ For purposes of temporarily suspending the proposed rule 
change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Sections 
19(b)(3)(C) \21\ and 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \22\ to determine whether 
the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. Institution 
of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any 
conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, the 
Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide 
additional comment on the proposed rule change to inform the 
Commission's analysis of whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). Once the Commission temporarily 
suspends a proposed rule change, Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act 
requires that the Commission institute proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) to determine whether a proposed rule change should be 
approved or disapproved.
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\23\ the Commission is 
providing notice of the grounds for possible disapproval under 
consideration:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, which requires that the rules 
of a national securities exchange ``provide for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its 
members and issuers and other persons using its facilities,'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other 
things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be ``designed 
to perfect the operation of a free and open market and a national 
market system'' and ``protect investors and the public interest,'' and 
not be ``designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers,'' \25\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, which requires that the rules 
of a national securities exchange ``not impose any burden on 
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes 
of [the Act].'' \26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the proposal increases connectivity fees for 
physical connections to the Exchange. The Exchange states that this fee 
increase would allow the Exchange to offset costs associated with 
providing and maintaining this technology.\27\ The commenter, among 
other concerns, asserts that the Exchange has not offered sufficient 
detail to support that the proposed fees are consistent with the Act 
and, in particular, whether the proposed fees are reasonable.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 40107.
    \28\ See Healthy Markets Letter, supra note 5, at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, the ``burden to 
demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with the [Act] 
and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . is on the [SRO] 
that proposed the rule change.'' \29\ The description of a proposed 
rule change, its purpose and operation, its effect, and a legal 
analysis of its consistency with applicable requirements must all be 
sufficiently detailed and specific to support an affirmative Commission 
finding,\30\ and any failure of an SRO to provide this information may 
result in the Commission not having a sufficient basis to make an 
affirmative finding that a proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Act and the applicable rules and regulations.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ Rule 700(b)(3), Commission Rules of Practice, 17 CFR 
201.700(b)(3).
    \30\ See id.
    \31\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional 
consideration and comment on the issues raised herein, including as to 
whether the proposed fees are consistent with the Act, and 
specifically, with its requirements that exchange fees be reasonable 
and equitably allocated; be designed to perfect the mechanism of a free 
and open market and the national market system, protect investors and 
the public interest, and not be unfairly discriminatory; or not impose 
an unnecessary or inappropriate burden on competition.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Commission's Solicitation of Comments

    The Commission requests written views, data, and arguments with 
respect to the concerns identified above as well as any other relevant 
concerns. Such comments should be submitted by October 12, 2018. 
Rebuttal comments should be submitted by October 26, 2018. Although 
there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or 
disapproval which would be facilitated by an oral presentation of 
views, data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to 
Rule 19b-4, any request for an opportunity to make an oral 
presentation.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Section 19(b)(2) of the Act grants the 
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either 
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate 
for consideration of a particular proposal by an SRO. See Securities 
Acts Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, 
Housing and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th 
Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency and 
merit of the Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, in 
addition to any other comments they may wish to submit about the 
proposed rule change.
    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the proposed rule change, including whether the 
proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-MIAX-2018-19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2018-19. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be

[[Page 47957]]

available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do 
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
MIAX-2018-19 and should be submitted on or before October 12, 2018. 
Rebuttal comments should be submitted by October 26, 2018.

VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the 
Act,\34\ that File Number SR-MIAX-2018-19 be and hereby is, temporarily 
suspended. In addition, the Commission is instituting proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57) and (58).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20547 Filed 9-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.