Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 43644-43646 [2018-18489]
Download as PDF
43644
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2018 / Notices
a hearing is made, Commerce intends to
hold the hearing at the U.S. Department
of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date
and time to be determined. Commerce
will issue a notice of final results of this
full sunset review, which will include
the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any such comments, no later than
October 1, 2018.
This five-year (sunset) review and
notice are in accordance with sections
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(1).
Dated: August 21, 2018.
Gary Taverman
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–18436 Filed 8–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–077]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that large diameter welded pipe (welded
pipe) from the People’s Republic of
China (China) is being, or is likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is July 1, 2017,
through December 31, 2017. Interested
parties are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Applicable August 27, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trenton Duncan or Ryan Mullen, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3539 or (202) 482–5260,
respectively.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This preliminary determination is
made in accordance with section 733(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Commerce published the
notice of initiation of this investigation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Aug 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
on February 20, 2018.1 On June 8, 2018,
Commerce postponed the preliminary
determination of this investigation; the
revised deadline is now August 20,
2018.2 For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is welded pipe from
China. For a complete description of the
scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to
Commerce’s regulations,4 the Initiation
Notice set aside a period of time for
parties to raise issues regarding product
coverage (i.e. scope).5 Certain interested
parties commented on the scope of the
investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. For a summary of the
product coverage comments and
rebuttal responses submitted to the
record for this investigation, and
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Preliminary Scope Decision
1 See
Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,
Greece, India, the People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey:
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83
FR 7154 (February 20, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,
Greece, India, the People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey:
Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 27953
(June 15, 2018).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation of Large Diameter Welded
Pipe from People’s Republic of China,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
5 See Initiation Notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Memorandum.6 Commerce is
preliminarily modifying the scope
language as it appeared in the Initiation
Notice. See the revised scope in
Appendix I to this notice.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. Pursuant to section
776(a) and (b) of the Act, we have
preliminarily relied upon facts
otherwise available, with adverse
inferences (AFA), for the China-wide
entity. As AFA, we have assigned the
highest margin alleged in the Petition of
132.63 percent.7 For a full description of
the methodology underlying
Commerce’s preliminary determination,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Combination Rates
In the Initiation Notice,8 Commerce
stated that it would calculate producer/
exporter combination rates for the
respondents that are eligible for a
separate rate in this investigation. Policy
Bulletin 05.1 describes this practice.9 In
this case, because no respondent
qualified for a separate rate, producer/
exporter combination rates were not
calculated.
Preliminary Determination
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margin exists:
Exporter
China-wide Entity ..................
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
132.63
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, Commerce will direct CBP to
suspend liquidation of subject
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Large Diameter Welded
Pipe from Canada, Greece, India, the People’s
Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the
Republic of Turkey: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations’’
(Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum), dated
June 19, 2018.
7 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Response to the
Department’s January 23, 2018 Supplemental
Questions Regarding Volume VIII of the Petition for
the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties,’’ dated January 25, 2018,’’ at Exhibit AD–
CN–Supp–3.
8 See Initiation Notice at 7160.
9 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
Bulletin 05.1), available on Commerce’s website at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
merchandise as described in the scope
of the investigation section entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, as discussed below. Further,
pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), Commerce
will instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the weighted average
amount by which normal value exceeds
U.S. price, as indicated in the chart
above as follows: (1) For the producer/
exporter combinations listed in the table
above, the cash deposit rate is equal to
the estimated weighted-average
dumping margin listed for that
combination in the table; (2) for all
combinations of Chinese producers/
exporters of merchandise under
consideration that have not established
eligibility for their own separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will be equal to the
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin established for the China-wide
entity; and (3) for all third-country
exporters of merchandise under
consideration not listed in the table
above, the cash deposit rate is the cash
deposit rate applicable to the China
producer/exporter combination (or the
China-wide entity) that supplied that
third-country exporter.
To determine the cash deposit rate,
Commerce normally adjusts the
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin by the amount of domestic
subsidy pass-through and export
subsidies determined in a companion
countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding
when CVD provisional measures are in
effect. However, in this investigation,
we made no adjustments to the Chinawide entity’s antidumping cash deposit
rate of 132.63 percent because
Commerce made no findings in the
companion CVD investigation that any
of the subsidies in question are export
subsidies.10 Further, pursuant to section
777A(f) of the Act, we normally adjust
cash deposit rates for estimated
domestic subsidy pass-through, where
appropriate. However, in this case there
is no basis to grant a domestic subsidy
pass-through adjustment.11 Thus,
Commerce has not made an adjustment
to the antidumping duty cash deposit
rates under section 777A(f) of the Act.
These suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until
further notice.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a
10 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
11 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Aug 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
preliminary determination within five
days of its public announcement or, if
there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
because Commerce preliminarily
applied AFA to the China-wide entity in
this investigation, in accordance with
section 776 of the Act, and the applied
AFA rate is based solely on the petition,
there are no calculations to disclose.
Verification
Because none of the mandatory
respondents in this investigation
responded to our requests for
information, verification will not be
conducted.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments
regarding non-scope issues may be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance no later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary
determination, unless the Secretary
alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in case briefs,
may be submitted no later than five days
after the deadline date for case briefs.12
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this investigation are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.
Additionally, case briefs regarding
scope issues may be submitted within
10 days after the date of this notice in
the Federal Register. Rebuttal briefs
regarding scope issues, limited to those
issues in the scope case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for scope case briefs.
All scope case and rebuttal briefs must
be filed identically on the records of this
investigation and the concurrent AD
and CVD investigations of welded pipe.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, whether any
participant is a foreign national, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, Commerce
12 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43645
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and date to be
determined. Parties should confirm the
date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its preliminary determination. If the
final determination is affirmative, the
ITC will determine before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after the final determination whether
these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S.
industry.
Final Determination
Section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(1) provide that
Commerce will issue the final
determination within 75 days after the
date of its preliminary determination.
Accordingly, Commerce will make its
final determination no later than 75
days after the signature date of this
preliminary determination.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: August 20, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is welded carbon and alloy steel
pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more
than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal
outside diameter (large diameter welded
pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length,
surface finish, grade, end finish, or
stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may
be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or
other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be
used for structural purposes, including, but
not limited to, piling. Specifically, not
included is large diameter welded pipe
produced only to specifications of the
American Water Works Association (AWWA)
for water and sewage pipe.
Large diameter welded pipe used to
transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is
normally produced to the American
Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L.
Large diameter welded pipe may also be
produced to American Society for Testing
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
43646
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2018 / Notices
and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252,
or A53, or other relevant domestic
specifications, grades and/or standards. Large
diameter welded pipe can be produced to
comparable foreign specifications, grades
and/or standards or to proprietary
specifications, grades and/or standards, or
can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting
the physical description set forth above is
covered by the scope of this investigation,
whether or not produced according to a
particular standard.
Subject merchandise also includes large
diameter welded pipe that has been further
processed in a third country, including but
not limited to coating, painting, notching,
beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any
other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of
the investigation if performed in the country
of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter
welded pipe.
The large diameter welded pipe that is
subject to this investigation is currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under
subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060,
7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060,
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060,
7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010,
7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and
7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Non-Market Economy Country
B. China-Wide Entity
C. Application of Facts Available and
Adverse Inferences
1. Application of Facts Available
2. Application of Facts Available With an
Adverse Inference
3. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA
Rate
VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the
Act
VII. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates for
Export Subsidies
VIII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018–18489 Filed 8–24–18; 8:45 am]
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Aug 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–833]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the
Republic of Turkey: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that large diameter welded pipe (welded
pipe) from the Republic of Turkey
(Turkey) is being, or is likely to be, sold
in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2017,
through December 31, 2017. Interested
parties are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Applicable August 27, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Janz or William Miller, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2972 or (202) 482–3906,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This preliminary determination is
made in accordance with section 733(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Commerce published the
notice of initiation of this investigation
on February 20, 2018.1 On June 8, 2018,
Commerce postponed the preliminary
determination of this investigation and
the revised deadline is now August 20,
2018.2 For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,
Greece, India, the People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey:
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83
FR 7154 (February 20, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,
Greece, India, the People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey:
Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 27953
(June 15, 2018).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation of Large Diameter Welded
Pipe from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is welded pipe from
Turkey. For a complete description of
the scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to
Commerce’s regulations,4 the Initiation
Notice set aside a period of time for
parties to raise issues regarding product
coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain interested
parties commented on the scope of the
investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. For a summary of the
product coverage comments and
rebuttal responses submitted to the
record for this investigation, and
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum.6 Commerce is
preliminarily modifying the scope
language as it appeared in the Initiation
Notice. See revised scope in Appendix
I to this notice.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. Commerce has
calculated export prices in accordance
with section 772(a) of the Act. Normal
value (NV) is calculated in accordance
with section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying the preliminary
determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
5 See Initiation Notice.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Large Diameter Welded
Pipe from Canada, Greece, India, the People’s
Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the
Republic of Turkey: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’
dated June 19, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43644-43646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18489]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-077]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from the People's
Republic of China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is July 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017.
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Applicable August 27, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trenton Duncan or Ryan Mullen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3539 or (202) 482-5260,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce
published the notice of initiation of this investigation on February
20, 2018.\1\ On June 8, 2018, Commerce postponed the preliminary
determination of this investigation; the revised deadline is now August
20, 2018.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, Greece, India,
the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the
Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 83 FR 7154 (February 20, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, Greece, India,
the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the
Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 27953 (June 15, 2018).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Large
Diameter Welded Pipe from People's Republic of China,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is welded pipe from
China. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation,
see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to Commerce's regulations,\4\ the
Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e. scope).\5\ Certain interested
parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in
the Initiation Notice. For a summary of the product coverage comments
and rebuttal responses submitted to the record for this investigation,
and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments timely
received, see the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.\6\ Commerce is
preliminarily modifying the scope language as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. See the revised scope in Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
\5\ See Initiation Notice.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,
Greece, India, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of
Korea, and the Republic of Turkey: Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations'' (Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum), dated June 19, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act,
we have preliminarily relied upon facts otherwise available, with
adverse inferences (AFA), for the China-wide entity. As AFA, we have
assigned the highest margin alleged in the Petition of 132.63
percent.\7\ For a full description of the methodology underlying
Commerce's preliminary determination, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Response to the Department's
January 23, 2018 Supplemental Questions Regarding Volume VIII of the
Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties,'' dated January 25, 2018,'' at Exhibit AD-CN-Supp-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combination Rates
In the Initiation Notice,\8\ Commerce stated that it would
calculate producer/exporter combination rates for the respondents that
are eligible for a separate rate in this investigation. Policy Bulletin
05.1 describes this practice.\9\ In this case, because no respondent
qualified for a separate rate, producer/exporter combination rates were
not calculated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Initiation Notice at 7160.
\9\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1,
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy
Countries,'' (April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on
Commerce's website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-wide Entity....................................... 132.63
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce will
direct CBP to suspend liquidation of subject
[[Page 43645]]
merchandise as described in the scope of the investigation section
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as
discussed below. Further, pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the weighted average amount by which normal value
exceeds U.S. price, as indicated in the chart above as follows: (1) For
the producer/exporter combinations listed in the table above, the cash
deposit rate is equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin
listed for that combination in the table; (2) for all combinations of
Chinese producers/exporters of merchandise under consideration that
have not established eligibility for their own separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping
margin established for the China-wide entity; and (3) for all third-
country exporters of merchandise under consideration not listed in the
table above, the cash deposit rate is the cash deposit rate applicable
to the China producer/exporter combination (or the China-wide entity)
that supplied that third-country exporter.
To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the
estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of domestic
subsidy pass-through and export subsidies determined in a companion
countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding when CVD provisional measures are
in effect. However, in this investigation, we made no adjustments to
the China-wide entity's antidumping cash deposit rate of 132.63 percent
because Commerce made no findings in the companion CVD investigation
that any of the subsidies in question are export subsidies.\10\
Further, pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, we normally adjust
cash deposit rates for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through, where
appropriate. However, in this case there is no basis to grant a
domestic subsidy pass-through adjustment.\11\ Thus, Commerce has not
made an adjustment to the antidumping duty cash deposit rates under
section 777A(f) of the Act. These suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a preliminary determination within five
days of its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because Commerce
preliminarily applied AFA to the China-wide entity in this
investigation, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, and the
applied AFA rate is based solely on the petition, there are no
calculations to disclose.
Verification
Because none of the mandatory respondents in this investigation
responded to our requests for information, verification will not be
conducted.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments regarding non-scope issues
may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance no later than 30 days after the date of publication of the
preliminary determination, unless the Secretary alters the time limit.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case
briefs.\12\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this investigation are
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, case briefs regarding scope issues may be submitted
within 10 days after the date of this notice in the Federal Register.
Rebuttal briefs regarding scope issues, limited to those issues in the
scope case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the
deadline date for scope case briefs. All scope case and rebuttal briefs
must be filed identically on the records of this investigation and the
concurrent AD and CVD investigations of welded pipe.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain
the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of
participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list
of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time
and date to be determined. Parties should confirm the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its preliminary
determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will
determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination
whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material
injury to, the U.S. industry.
Final Determination
Section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1) provide that
Commerce will issue the final determination within 75 days after the
date of its preliminary determination. Accordingly, Commerce will make
its final determination no later than 75 days after the signature date
of this preliminary determination.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: August 20, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is welded carbon
and alloy steel pipe (including stainless steel pipe), more than
406.4 mm (16 inches) in nominal outside diameter (large diameter
welded pipe), regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish,
grade, end finish, or stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may be
used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other fluids, liquids,
or gases. It may also be used for structural purposes, including,
but not limited to, piling. Specifically, not included is large
diameter welded pipe produced only to specifications of the American
Water Works Association (AWWA) for water and sewage pipe.
Large diameter welded pipe used to transport oil, gas, or
natural gas liquids is normally produced to the American Petroleum
Institute (API) specification 5L. Large diameter welded pipe may
also be produced to American Society for Testing
[[Page 43646]]
and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, or A53, or other relevant
domestic specifications, grades and/or standards. Large diameter
welded pipe can be produced to comparable foreign specifications,
grades and/or standards or to proprietary specifications, grades
and/or standards, or can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting
the physical description set forth above is covered by the scope of
this investigation, whether or not produced according to a
particular standard.
Subject merchandise also includes large diameter welded pipe
that has been further processed in a third country, including but
not limited to coating, painting, notching, beveling, cutting,
punching, welding, or any other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if
performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope large
diameter welded pipe.
The large diameter welded pipe that is subject to this
investigation is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings
7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030,
7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060,
7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010, 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000
and 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Non-Market Economy Country
B. China-Wide Entity
C. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
1. Application of Facts Available
2. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference
3. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA Rate
VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
VII. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates for Export Subsidies
VIII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018-18489 Filed 8-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P