Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); Institution of Investigation, 40787-40788 [2018-17686]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices
Wayne County
Dublin Friends Meeting House, 2352 W
Maple St., Dublin, SG100002868
Fountain City Historic District, Roughly
bounded by Noland’s Fork, North, Hartley
& Vine Sts., Fountain City, SG100002869
MICHIGAN
Calhoun County
Old-Merchants National Bank and Trust Co.
Building, 25 W Michigan Ave., Battle
Creek, SG100002887
OHIO
Cuyahoga County
Astrup Company Building, The, 2397 W 25th
St., Cleveland, SG100002875
Darke County
Knights of Pythias Hall, 118 E Washington
St., New Madison, SG100002876
Franklin County
Hartman Hotel, 275 S 4th & 150 E Main Sts.,
Columbus, SG100002877
Hamilton County
Provident Savings Bank and Trust Co., 630–
632 Vine St., Cincinnati, SG100002878
OKLAHOMA
Caddo County
Rock Island Passenger Station, 301 E Main
St., Anadarko, SG100002874
Cleveland County
Southridge Addition Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Classen Blvd.,
Oklahoma & S Ponca Aves., E Boyd, Macy
& Okmulgee Sts., Norman, SG100002882
VIRGINIA
Alexandria Independent City
Oakland Baptist Cemetery, 4195 W Braddock
Rd., Alexandria, SG100002883
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Charlottesville Independent City
Wyndhurst (Charlottesville MRA), 605
Preston Pl., Charlottesville, MV82001816
Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60.
Dated: July 27, 2018.
Julie H. Ernstein,
Acting Chief, National Register of Historic
Places/National Historic Landmarks Program
and Deputy Keeper of the National Register
of Historic Places.
[FR Doc. 2018–17665 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Summit County
Cuyahoga Falls Downtown Historic District,
111–245 Portage Trail, 138 Stowe Ave.,
2035 Oldetown Loop, 2091–2250 Front,
2044–2220 2nd & 2055–2253 3rd Sts.,
Cuyahoga Falls, SG100002881
Petersburg Independent City
Halifax Triangle and Downtown Commercial
Historic District, Generally bounded by
Washington, Adams, Sycamore, Halifax,
Byrne & Harrison Sts., Petersburg,
SG100002886
WISCONSIN
Sheboygan County
Badger State Tanning Company, 1031
Maryland Ave., Sheboygan, SG100002888
A request for removal has been made for
the following resource:
Jkt 244001
VIRGINIA
Certain Microperforated Packaging
Containing Fresh Produce (II);
Institution of Investigation
Stark County
Lavin, Carl and Audrey, House, 5240 Plain
Center Ave. NE, Canton, SG100002880
17:15 Aug 15, 2018
Cleveland County
DeBarr Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Boyd St., DeBarr Ave.,
Duffy St. and the A T & S F RR tracks
Norman, OT91001904
A request to move has been received for
the following resource:
[Inv. No. 337–TA–1127]
Hancock County
Boss Manufacturing Company, The, 317 W
Main Cross St., Findlay, SG100002879
VerDate Sep<11>2014
OKLAHOMA
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on July
12, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
Windham Packaging, LLC of Windham,
New Hampshire. A letter supplementing
the complaint was filed on August 2,
2018. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain microperforated packaging
containing fresh produce (II) by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,083,837 (‘‘the ’837 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40787
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
1–6, 11, and 13 of the ’837 patent; and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘bags for fresh produce
and bags containing fresh produce. The
bags contain microperforations that are
specifically designed and arranged to
increase the shelf-life of fresh produce
by affecting the mixture of gases within
the bag’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
40788
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices
(a) The complainant is: Windham
Packaging, LLC, 18 Wilson Rd,
Windham, NH 03087.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Growers Express, LLC, 150 Main St.,
Suite 210, Salinas, CA 93901.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 14701
Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, MN
55347.
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 13, 2018.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–17686 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Extension of Public
Comment Period for Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
On May 16, 2018, the Department of
Justice (DOJ) lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the Southern District of
Georgia in the lawsuit entitled United
States v. Hercules LLC, Civil Action No.
2:18–cv–00062–LGW–RSB. To allow for
additional community input and
feedback, DOJ is extending the public
comment period for an additional thirty
(30) days.
The proposed consent decree would
require defendant Hercules LLC to
implement the interim remedy selected
by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) for the outfall, known as
Operable Unit 1, of the Terry Creek
Dredge Spoil Areas/Hercules Outfall
Site (‘‘Site’’) in Brunswick, in Glynn
County, Georgia. The consent decree
would also require the defendant to
reimburse EPA $153,009.48 in past
response costs at the Site, and to pay
future response costs incurred by the
United States in connection with this
consent decree. Notice of the lodging of
the decree was originally published in
the Federal Register on May 23, 2018.
See 83 FR 23937 (May 23, 2018). The
publication of the original notice
opened a thirty (30) day period for
public comment on the Decree. At the
request of some members of the public,
the comment period was then extended
by 60 days, to August 21, 2018. See 83
FR 27799 (June 14, 2018). The
publication of the present notice
extends the period for public comment
on the Decree to September 20, 2018.
Comments concerning the consent
decree should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and should refer to United
States v. Hercules, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–
11–3–11685. All comments must be
submitted no later than September 20,
2018. Comments may be submitted
either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the consent decree may be examined
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Aug 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
consent decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $146.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a paper copy
without the exhibits and signature
pages, the cost is $17.25.
Henry S. Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–17680 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On August 10, 2018, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the Southern District of
Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United
States and Illinois v. WRB Refining LP,
et al., Civil Action No. 3:18–cv–01484.
In the complaint filed
contemporaneously with the proposed
consent decree, the United States and
Illinois alleged that defendants WRB
Refining LP and Phillips 66 Company
(‘‘WRB/P66’’) violated various
provisions of the Clean Air Act and the
Illinois Environmental Protection Act at
a refinery owned and operated by
defendants in Roxana and Hartford,
Illinois (‘‘Wood River Refinery’’). The
complaint sought injunctive relief and
civil penalties. Under the proposed
consent decree, WRB/P66 will
implement a flare minimization and
flare efficiency program to reduce
emissions of volatile organic
compounds; undertake a variety to
practices to reduce pollution from
valves and pumps; limit benzene
emissions from wastewater management
units; and develop and implement an
operation and maintenance plan to
improve the operation of the continuous
emissions monitoring systems at the
Wood River Refinery. As mitigation for
past excess emissions, WRB/P66, among
other things, will install a new vacuum
truck unloading facility; set up
monitoring devices around its
wastewater treatment plant; and use low
emissions valves when it has to replace
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40787-40788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17686]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-1127]
Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II);
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 12, 2018, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Windham Packaging,
LLC of Windham, New Hampshire. A letter supplementing the complaint was
filed on August 2, 2018. The complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain microperforated packaging containing fresh produce (II) by
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837
(``the '837 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1-6, 11, and 13 of the '837 patent; and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``bags for fresh
produce and bags containing fresh produce. The bags contain
microperforations that are specifically designed and arranged to
increase the shelf-life of fresh produce by affecting the mixture of
gases within the bag'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
[[Page 40788]]
(a) The complainant is: Windham Packaging, LLC, 18 Wilson Rd,
Windham, NH 03087.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Growers Express, LLC, 150 Main St., Suite 210, Salinas, CA 93901.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 14701 Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, MN
55347.
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 13, 2018.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-17686 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P