Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); Institution of Investigation, 40787-40788 [2018-17686]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices Wayne County Dublin Friends Meeting House, 2352 W Maple St., Dublin, SG100002868 Fountain City Historic District, Roughly bounded by Noland’s Fork, North, Hartley & Vine Sts., Fountain City, SG100002869 MICHIGAN Calhoun County Old-Merchants National Bank and Trust Co. Building, 25 W Michigan Ave., Battle Creek, SG100002887 OHIO Cuyahoga County Astrup Company Building, The, 2397 W 25th St., Cleveland, SG100002875 Darke County Knights of Pythias Hall, 118 E Washington St., New Madison, SG100002876 Franklin County Hartman Hotel, 275 S 4th & 150 E Main Sts., Columbus, SG100002877 Hamilton County Provident Savings Bank and Trust Co., 630– 632 Vine St., Cincinnati, SG100002878 OKLAHOMA Caddo County Rock Island Passenger Station, 301 E Main St., Anadarko, SG100002874 Cleveland County Southridge Addition Historic District, Roughly bounded by Classen Blvd., Oklahoma & S Ponca Aves., E Boyd, Macy & Okmulgee Sts., Norman, SG100002882 VIRGINIA Alexandria Independent City Oakland Baptist Cemetery, 4195 W Braddock Rd., Alexandria, SG100002883 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Charlottesville Independent City Wyndhurst (Charlottesville MRA), 605 Preston Pl., Charlottesville, MV82001816 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Dated: July 27, 2018. Julie H. Ernstein, Acting Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program and Deputy Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places. [FR Doc. 2018–17665 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Summit County Cuyahoga Falls Downtown Historic District, 111–245 Portage Trail, 138 Stowe Ave., 2035 Oldetown Loop, 2091–2250 Front, 2044–2220 2nd & 2055–2253 3rd Sts., Cuyahoga Falls, SG100002881 Petersburg Independent City Halifax Triangle and Downtown Commercial Historic District, Generally bounded by Washington, Adams, Sycamore, Halifax, Byrne & Harrison Sts., Petersburg, SG100002886 WISCONSIN Sheboygan County Badger State Tanning Company, 1031 Maryland Ave., Sheboygan, SG100002888 A request for removal has been made for the following resource: Jkt 244001 VIRGINIA Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); Institution of Investigation Stark County Lavin, Carl and Audrey, House, 5240 Plain Center Ave. NE, Canton, SG100002880 17:15 Aug 15, 2018 Cleveland County DeBarr Historic District, Roughly bounded by Boyd St., DeBarr Ave., Duffy St. and the A T & S F RR tracks Norman, OT91001904 A request to move has been received for the following resource: [Inv. No. 337–TA–1127] Hancock County Boss Manufacturing Company, The, 317 W Main Cross St., Findlay, SG100002879 VerDate Sep<11>2014 OKLAHOMA Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 12, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Windham Packaging, LLC of Windham, New Hampshire. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on August 2, 2018. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain microperforated packaging containing fresh produce (II) by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837 (‘‘the ’837 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40787 Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–6, 11, and 13 of the ’837 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘bags for fresh produce and bags containing fresh produce. The bags contain microperforations that are specifically designed and arranged to increase the shelf-life of fresh produce by affecting the mixture of gases within the bag’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM 16AUN1 40788 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices (a) The complainant is: Windham Packaging, LLC, 18 Wilson Rd, Windham, NH 03087. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Growers Express, LLC, 150 Main St., Suite 210, Salinas, CA 93901. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 14701 Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347. (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES By order of the Commission. Issued: August 13, 2018. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2018–17686 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act On May 16, 2018, the Department of Justice (DOJ) lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Hercules LLC, Civil Action No. 2:18–cv–00062–LGW–RSB. To allow for additional community input and feedback, DOJ is extending the public comment period for an additional thirty (30) days. The proposed consent decree would require defendant Hercules LLC to implement the interim remedy selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the outfall, known as Operable Unit 1, of the Terry Creek Dredge Spoil Areas/Hercules Outfall Site (‘‘Site’’) in Brunswick, in Glynn County, Georgia. The consent decree would also require the defendant to reimburse EPA $153,009.48 in past response costs at the Site, and to pay future response costs incurred by the United States in connection with this consent decree. Notice of the lodging of the decree was originally published in the Federal Register on May 23, 2018. See 83 FR 23937 (May 23, 2018). The publication of the original notice opened a thirty (30) day period for public comment on the Decree. At the request of some members of the public, the comment period was then extended by 60 days, to August 21, 2018. See 83 FR 27799 (June 14, 2018). The publication of the present notice extends the period for public comment on the Decree to September 20, 2018. Comments concerning the consent decree should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Hercules, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 11–3–11685. All comments must be submitted no later than September 20, 2018. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. By mail ......... During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:15 Aug 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https:// www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $146.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper copy without the exhibits and signature pages, the cost is $17.25. Henry S. Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2018–17680 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act On August 10, 2018, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United States and Illinois v. WRB Refining LP, et al., Civil Action No. 3:18–cv–01484. In the complaint filed contemporaneously with the proposed consent decree, the United States and Illinois alleged that defendants WRB Refining LP and Phillips 66 Company (‘‘WRB/P66’’) violated various provisions of the Clean Air Act and the Illinois Environmental Protection Act at a refinery owned and operated by defendants in Roxana and Hartford, Illinois (‘‘Wood River Refinery’’). The complaint sought injunctive relief and civil penalties. Under the proposed consent decree, WRB/P66 will implement a flare minimization and flare efficiency program to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds; undertake a variety to practices to reduce pollution from valves and pumps; limit benzene emissions from wastewater management units; and develop and implement an operation and maintenance plan to improve the operation of the continuous emissions monitoring systems at the Wood River Refinery. As mitigation for past excess emissions, WRB/P66, among other things, will install a new vacuum truck unloading facility; set up monitoring devices around its wastewater treatment plant; and use low emissions valves when it has to replace E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM 16AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40787-40788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-1127]


Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); 
Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 12, 2018, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Windham Packaging, 
LLC of Windham, New Hampshire. A letter supplementing the complaint was 
filed on August 2, 2018. The complaint alleges violations of section 
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain microperforated packaging containing fresh produce (II) by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837 
(``the '837 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal 
Statute.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket 
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1-6, 11, and 13 of the '837 patent; and whether an industry in 
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``bags for fresh 
produce and bags containing fresh produce. The bags contain 
microperforations that are specifically designed and arranged to 
increase the shelf-life of fresh produce by affecting the mixture of 
gases within the bag'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:

[[Page 40788]]

    (a) The complainant is: Windham Packaging, LLC, 18 Wilson Rd, 
Windham, NH 03087.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Growers Express, LLC, 150 Main St., Suite 210, Salinas, CA 93901.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 14701 Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, MN 
55347.

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 13, 2018.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-17686 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.