Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 39683-39685 [2018-17160]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
Exporter/producer
Dongkuk Steel Mill ......................
EEW Korea Co, Ltd ....................
HISTEEL Co., Ltd .......................
Husteel Co., Ltd ..........................
Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd .........
Kolon Global Corp ......................
Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co.,
Ltd ...........................................
Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd .............
MSTEEL Co., Ltd .......................
NEXTEEL Co., Ltd .....................
Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division) ........................................
POSCO .......................................
Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd ............
Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd .............
Soon-Hong Trading Company ....
Steel Flower Co., Ltd ..................
TGS Pipe ....................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
merchandise covered by the amended
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.14
We intend to issue liquidation
16.58 instructions to CBP for Hyundai Steel,
16.58 SeAH, and the companies subject to the
16.58 review-specific average rate 15 days
16.58 after publication of these amended final
16.58 results of this administrative review.
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
16.58
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or
16.58 withdrawn from warehouse, for
16.58 consumption on or after July 18, 2018,
16.58 the date of publication date of the Final
16.58 Results, as provided by section
16.58 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
16.58
deposit rate for each specific company
16.58
listed above will be that established in
We intend to disclose the calculations the final results of this review, except if
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
which case the cash deposit rate will be
CFR 351.224(b).
zero; (2) for previously investigated
Assessment Rates
companies not participating in this
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the review, the cash deposit will continue
to be the company-specific rate
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
published for the most recently
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
completed segment of this proceeding in
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
which the company participated; (3) if
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
appropriate entries of subject
review, or the original less-than-fairmerchandise in accordance with the
value (LTFV) investigation, but the
amended final results of this review.
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
will be the rate established for the most
where Hyundai Steel and SeAH
recent segment for the manufacturer of
reported the entered value of their U.S.
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
sales, we calculated importer-specific
ad valorem duty assessment rates based deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 4.38
on the ratio of the total amount of
percent, the all-others rate established
dumping calculated for the examined
in the LTFV investigation.15 These
sales to the total entered value of the
deposit requirements, when imposed,
sales for which entered value was
shall remain in effect until further
reported. Where Hyundai Steel did not
notice.
report entered value, we calculated the
entered value in order to calculate the
Notification to Importers
assessment rate. Where either the
This notice serves as a final reminder
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
to importers of their responsibility
margin is zero or de minimis within the
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an
certificate regarding the reimbursement
importer-specific rate is zero or de
of antidumping duties prior to
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidation of the relevant entries
liquidate the appropriate entries
during this review period. Failure to
without regard to antidumping duties.
comply with this requirement could
For the companies which were not
result in the Secretary’s presumption
selected for individual review, we will
that reimbursement of antidumping
assign an assessment rate based on the
duties occurred and the subsequent
average 13 of the cash deposit rates
calculated for Hyundai Steel and SeAH. assessment of double antidumping
The amended final results of this review duties.
shall be the basis for the assessment of
14 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
antidumping duties on entries of
15 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
16.58
16.58
16.58
16.58
13 This
rate was calculated as discussed in
footnote 11, above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping
Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1,
2015).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39683
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
These amended final results and
notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: August 6, 2018.
James Maeder,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2018–17164 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–863]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products From India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that certain corrosion-resistant steel
products (CORE) from India are being,
or are likely to be sold, at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR), January 4, 2016, through
June 30, 2017. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Greenberg or Kabir Archuletta,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0652 or
(202) 482–2593, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
39684
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CORE from
India in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).1 The review covers
one producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, JSW Steel Ltd. and JSW
Steel Coated Products Limited
(collectively, JSW). During the
investigation, Commerce found JSW to
be a single entity and, because there
were no changes to the facts that
supported that determination, we
continue to find that these companies
are a part of a single entity for this
administrative review.2 Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the closure
of the Federal Government from January
20 through 22, 2018.3 On March 12,
2018, Commerce postponed the
preliminary results of this review until
August 3, 2018.4
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are CORE from India. For a full
description of the scope, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum
dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice.5
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Jkt 244001
We preliminarily determine that, for
the period of January 4, 2016, through
June 30, 2017, the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists:
Exporter/producer
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
15.33
Disclosure and Public Comment
1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final
Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India
and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
48390 (July 25, 2016) (Order).
2 Id. at 48393.
3 See Memorandum for The Record from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal
Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), dated
January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by 3 days.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,’’ dated March 12, 2018.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Corrosion-Resistant
Steel Products from India; 2016–2017,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
Preliminary Results of Review
JSW Steel Ltd./JSW Coated
Products Limited .....................
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Act. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
topics included in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included at
the Appendix to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
available at https://enforcement.trade.
gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties within five days
after public announcement of the
preliminary results. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c), interested parties may
submit case briefs not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed
not later than five days after the date for
filing case briefs. Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue, (2) a brief summary of the
argument, and (3) a table of authorities.
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
using ACCESS.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic
records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
those raised in the respective case
briefs. Commerce intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results,
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. If JSW’s weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in
the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific ad
valorem antidumping duty assessment
rate based on the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales to the total
entered value of those same sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review when the
importer-specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review is not zero or de minimis. If
JSW’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties. The final results of this review
shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by this review
where applicable.
In accordance with Commerce’s
‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by JSW for which it
did not know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at
the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the intermediate company(ies) involved
in the transaction. We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication date of the final results of
this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for JSW will be
the rate established in the final results
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
of this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation, but
the producer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 0.00
percent, the all-others rate established
in the investigation.6 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
V. Date of Sale
VI. Product Comparisons
VII. Export Price
VIII. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
IX. Currency Conversion
X. Recommendation
Notification to Importers
International Trade Administration
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and
increase the subsequent assessment of
the antidumping duties by the amount
of the antidumping duties
reimbursement.
The preliminary results of review are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1)
and 351.221(b)(4).
[A–475–818]
Dated: August 3, 2018.
James Maeder,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations performing the duties of Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of the Comparison
Method
Order.
Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
1 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. (previously known as
Ghigi lndustria Agroalimentare Srl)
(Ghigi) and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Pasta
Zara) (collectively Ghigi/Zara) made
sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) and that Industria
Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) did
not. We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Applicable August 10,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1168 or (202) 482–1167,
respectively.
AGENCY:
(POR) is July 1, 2016, through June 30,
2017.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
Order 1 is certain pasta from Italy and is
currently classifiable under items
1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.2
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). Constructed export price or export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
preliminary results, see Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain pasta
(pasta) from Italy. The period of review
As a result of this review, we
calculated a weighted-average dumping
margin of 5.97 percent for Ghigi/Zara
and a de minimis margin for Indalco for
the period July 1, 2016, through June 30,
2017. Therefore, in accordance with
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we
assigned the weighted-average dumping
margin of 5.97 percent calculated for
Ghigi/Zara to the seven non-selected
companies in these preliminary results,
as referenced below.
Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR
38547 (July 24, 1996) (AD Order).
2 See the ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Appendix
6 See
[FR Doc. 2018–17160 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
39685
Administrative Review: Certain Pasta from Italy;
2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently and hereby
adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39683-39685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17160]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-863]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-
2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from India are
being, or are likely to be sold, at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR), January 4, 2016, through June 30, 2017. We
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable August 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Greenberg or Kabir Archuletta,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0652 or (202)
482-2593, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 39684]]
Background
Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on CORE from India in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ The review covers
one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, JSW Steel Ltd. and
JSW Steel Coated Products Limited (collectively, JSW). During the
investigation, Commerce found JSW to be a single entity and, because
there were no changes to the facts that supported that determination,
we continue to find that these companies are a part of a single entity
for this administrative review.\2\ Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016) (Order).
\2\ Id. at 48393.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22,
2018.\3\ On March 12, 2018, Commerce postponed the preliminary results
of this review until August 3, 2018.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23,
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been
extended by 3 days.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 12,
2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are CORE from India. For a full
description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India; 2016-2017,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A
list of the topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included at the Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for the period of January 4, 2016,
through June 30, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margin
exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSW Steel Ltd./JSW Coated Products Limited................. 15.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties within
five days after public announcement of the preliminary results.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case
briefs. Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of
authorities. Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of
this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case briefs. Commerce intends to issue
the final results of this administrative review, including the results
of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later
than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If JSW's
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment
rate based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for
the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the
final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. If JSW's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
this review where applicable.
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by JSW for
which it did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-
others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JSW will be the
rate established in the final results
[[Page 39685]]
of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 0.00 percent, the all-others rate established in the
investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the
subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of the
antidumping duties reimbursement.
The preliminary results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and sections
19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 3, 2018.
James Maeder,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of the Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
V. Date of Sale
VI. Product Comparisons
VII. Export Price
VIII. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
IX. Currency Conversion
X. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-17160 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
