Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule, 39800-39802 [2018-17124]
Download as PDF
39800
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Notice of Meeting of the Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards
(ACRS) Subcommittee on Regulatory
Policies & Practices
The ACRS Subcommittee on
Regulatory Policies and Practices will
hold a meeting on August 22, 2018, at
11545 Rockville Pike, Room T–2B1,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
This meeting will be open to public
attendance. The agenda for the subject
meeting shall be as follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Wednesday, August 22, 2018—1:00 p.m.
Until 5:00 p.m.
The Subcommittee will review the
Early Site Permit for Clinch River
(Section 13.3, ‘‘Emergency Planning’’)
and will hear presentations by and hold
discussions with the NRC staff and
other interested persons regarding this
matter. The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Quynh Nguyen
(Telephone 301–415–5844 or Email
Quynh.Nguyen@nrc.gov) five days prior
to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be emailed to the DFO one day
before the meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. The public
bridgeline number for the meeting is
866–822–3032, passcode 8272423.
Detailed procedures for the conduct of
and participation in ACRS meetings
were published in the Federal Register
on October 4, 2017 (82 FR 46312).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
website at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the website cited above or by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major
inconvenience.
If attending this meeting, please enter
through the One White Flint North
building, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. After
registering with Security, please contact
Mr. Theron Brown (Telephone 301–
415–6207) to be escorted to the meeting
room.
Dated: August 2, 2018.
Mark L. Banks,
Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2018–17119 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83780; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2018–56]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule
August 6, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on July 31,
2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’). The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
August 1, 2018. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The purpose of this filing is to modify
the Fee Schedule, effective August 1,
2018, to modify or eliminate the criteria
for achieving various credits.
The Exchange currently provides a
number of incentives for OTP Holders
and OTP Firms (collectively, ‘‘OTPs’’)
designed to encourage OTPs to direct
additional order flow to the Exchange to
achieve more favorable pricing and
higher credits. Among these incentives
are enhanced posted liquidity credits
based on achieving certain percentages
of NYSE Arca Equity daily activity, also
known as ‘‘cross-asset pricing.’’ In
addition, certain of the qualifications for
achieving these incentives are more
tailored to specific activity (i.e., posting
in Penny Pilot issues only, or cross-asset
pricing based only on levels of Retail
Orders on the NYSE Arca Equity
Market). Similarly, because the
Exchange allows Order Flow Providers
(‘‘OFPs’’) to aggregate their volume
executed on NYSE Arca with affiliated
or Appointed Market Makers, OFPs may
encourage an increased level of activity
from these participants to qualify for
various incentives, including higher
credits for Customer orders.4 The
Exchange proposes to modify certain of
the thresholds for achieving posting
credits on the Exchange as described
below.
Pursuant to the Customer Penny Pilot
Posting Tiers (the ‘‘Penny Credit Tiers’’,
each a ‘‘Penny Tier’’), Customer orders
4 Per the Fee Schedule, ‘‘[u]nless Professional
Customer executions are specifically delineated,
such executions will be treated as ‘Customer’
executions for fee/credit purposes.’’ See Fee
Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: TRADE-RELATED
CHARGES FOR STANDARD OPTIONS.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
that post liquidity and are executed on
the Exchange earn a base credit of $0.25
per contract, with the ability to earn
increased credits (up to $0.50) based on
the participant’s activity. Currently,
there are eight (8) Penny Credit Tiers,
with increasing minimum volume
thresholds associated with each tier.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
Penny Tier 4, which would remove the
$0.46 per contract credit for OTPs that
achieve at least 0.60% of TCADV from
Customer posted interest in all issues,
plus executed Average Daily Volume
(‘‘ADV’’) of Retail Orders of 0.1% ADV
of U.S. Equity Market Share Posted and
Executed on NYSE Arca Equity Market.
Consistent with this change, the
Exchange proposed to renumber the
remaining higher Tiers (i.e., to renumber current Penny Tiers 5–8 to
Penny Tiers 4–7). The Exchange also
proposes to modify certain minimum
volume thresholds in new Penny Tiers
5 and 6. In new Penny Tier 5, in the
alternative qualification, an OTP would
earn the $0.48 per contract credit by
achieving at least 0.75% (up from
0.50%) of TCADV from Customer
posted interest in all issues, plus at least
0.45% of TCADV from Market Maker
Total Electronic Volume.5 As proposed,
in the new Penny Tier 6, an OTP would
earn the $0.49 per contract credit by
achieving at least 0.75% (up from
0.50%) of TCADV from Customer
posted interest in all issues, plus at least
0.60% of TCADV from Market Maker
Total Electronic Volume.
The Exchange also offers a Customer
Incentive Program (the ‘‘Incentive
Program’’), which offers OTPs the
ability to earn one additional credit by
achieving the minimum thresholds
listed.6 The Exchange now proposes to
eliminate one of the alternatives.
Specifically, the Exchange would no
longer provide an additional $0.03 per
contract credit for achieving executed
ADV of retail orders of 0.10% ADV of
U.S. Equity Market Share Posted and
Executed on NYSE Arca Equity Market.
The Exchange also offers increasing
credits to be applied to executions of
Customer posted interest in non-Penny
Pilot issues based on minimum volume
5 Per the Fee Schedule, the ‘‘Total Industry
Customer equity and ETF option average daily
volume (‘TCADV’) includes OCC calculated
Customer volume of all types, including Complex
Order Transactions and QCC transactions, in equity
and ETF options.’’ See Fee Schedule, endnote 8.
6 The Exchange proposes to make a nonsubstantive change to the second alternative basis
for the Incentive Program by replacing reference to
‘‘Total Industry Customer equity and ETF option
ADV’’ with the defined abbreviation of ‘‘TCADV,’’
which would add clarity and internal consistency
to the Fee Schedule. See proposed Fee Schedule,
Customer Incentive Program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
thresholds through the Customer
Posting Credit Tiers in Non-Penny Pilot
Issues (‘‘Non-Penny Credit Tiers’’, each
a ‘‘Non-Penny Tier’’). The Exchange
proposes to eliminate one Non-Penny
Tier (the current Tier A), which would
remove the $0.83 per contract credit for
OTPs that achieve at least 0.70% of
TCADV from Customer posted interest
in all issues, plus executed ADV of
Retail Orders of 0.1% ADV of U.S.
Equity Market Share Posted and
Executed on NYSE Arca Equity Market.
Consistent with this change, the
Exchange proposes to re-title the
balance of the Non-Penny Tiers (i.e., to
re-title current Non-Penny Tiers B–F to
Non-Penny Tiers A through E).
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to modify the minimum volume
threshold required to achieve new Tier
B, such that an OTP would earn the
$0.94 per contract credit by achieving at
least 0.75% (up from 0.50%) of TCADV
from Customer posted interest in all
issues, plus an ADV from Market Maker
Total Electronic Volume equal to 0.45%
of TCADV. The Exchange also proposes
to modify the minimum volume
threshold for the new Tier D, such that
an OTP would earn the $1.00 per
contract credit by achieving at least
0.75% (up from 0.50%) of TCADV from
Customer posted interest in all issues,
plus an ADV from Market Maker Total
Electronic Volume equal to 0.60% of
TCADV.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,8 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed modifications to the minimum
threshold qualification for certain of the
Penny, and Non-Penny, Credit Tiers and
the Incentive Program are reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because, among other
things, the proposed changes would
streamline the available means for an
OTP to qualify for credits on the
Exchange, while still offering OTPs
incentives to direct volume to the
Exchange. The Exchange notes that it
proposes to remove certain tiers from
the various posting credit programs
7 15
8 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39801
because such tiers are underutilized.
The proposed changes, therefore, should
provide more meaningful criteria for
OTPs to qualify for (and seek to achieve
higher) credits by posting desired
volume on the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes
would continue to attract Customer (and
Professional Customer) orders to the
Exchange, which results in increased
liquidity to the benefit of all
participants by offering greater price
discovery, increased transparency, and
an increased opportunity to trade on the
Exchange.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed changes are reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the modified
minimum volume thresholds for the
Penny, and Non-Penny, Tiers and the
Incentive Program would be available to
all similarly-situated market
participants on an equal and nondiscriminatory basis. The Exchange
believes the proposed modifications are
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because they encourage
participants to enhance their order flow
to qualify for the various incentives,
including encouraging more
participants to have affiliated or
appointed order flow directed to the
Exchange. Further, encouraging OFPs to
send higher volumes of Customer (and
Professional Customer) orders to the
Exchange would also contribute to the
Exchange’s depth of book as well as to
the top of book liquidity.
The proposed changes to the various
posting credit incentives offered on the
Exchange are also reasonable as they are
consistent with similar such programs
offered on other exchanges.9
Finally, the Exchange believes the
proposed non-substantive changes to
the Fee Schedule (see supra note 6) are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would add
clarity, transparency and internal
consistency to the Fee Schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, the Exchange believes that the
9 See e.g., NASDAQ Options Market, Chapter XV
Options Pricing, Sec. 2, Fees and Rebates, available
here, https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQ
Tools/PlatformViewer.asp?selectednode=chp_1_1_
15&manual=%2Fnasdaq%2Fmain%2Fnasdaqoptionsrules%2F (setting forth various rebates per
executed contract, including for adding Customer
and Professional Customer volume).
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
39802
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2018 / Notices
proposed changes would encourage
competition, including by attracting
additional liquidity to the Exchange,
which would continue to make the
Exchange a more competitive venue for,
among other things, order execution and
price discovery. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed change would
impair the ability of any market
participants or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets. Further, the incentive would
be available to all similarly-situated
participants, and, as such, the proposed
change would not impose a disparate
burden on competition either among or
between classes of market participants
and may, in fact, encourage
competition. The Exchange notes that
the proposed rule change merely
modifies existing posting tiers that offer
additional credits to OTPs that (opt to)
meet certain volume thresholds. The
proposed change does not impose any
new burden or requirement on OTPs, as
achieving the modified tiers is voluntary
(i.e., an OTP that does not does not seek
to achieve additional credits by meeting
the modified volume thresholds has no
obligation to do so).
The Exchange notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change reflects this competitive
environment.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 10 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 11
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
10 15
11 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Aug 09, 2018
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 12 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2018–56 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2018–56. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
12 15
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2018–56 and
should be submitted on or before
August 31, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–17124 Filed 8–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT: 83 FR 38759, August 7,
2018.
PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF
THE MEETING: Thursday, August 9, 2018
at 2:00 p.m.
The Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
August 9, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. has been
changed to Thursday, August 9, 2018 at
1:00 p.m.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information and to ascertain
what, if any, matters have been added,
deleted or postponed, please contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 551–
5400.
CHANGES IN THE MEETING:
Dated: August 7, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–17259 Filed 8–8–18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83781; File No. SR–FINRA–
2018–027]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend FINRA Rule
9000 Series (Code of Procedure) To
Reflect an Internal Reorganization of
FINRA’s Enforcement Operations
August 6, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
13 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39800-39802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17124]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-83780; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2018-56]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule
August 6, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on July 31, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule''). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change
effective August 1, 2018. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify the Fee Schedule, effective
August 1, 2018, to modify or eliminate the criteria for achieving
various credits.
The Exchange currently provides a number of incentives for OTP
Holders and OTP Firms (collectively, ``OTPs'') designed to encourage
OTPs to direct additional order flow to the Exchange to achieve more
favorable pricing and higher credits. Among these incentives are
enhanced posted liquidity credits based on achieving certain
percentages of NYSE Arca Equity daily activity, also known as ``cross-
asset pricing.'' In addition, certain of the qualifications for
achieving these incentives are more tailored to specific activity
(i.e., posting in Penny Pilot issues only, or cross-asset pricing based
only on levels of Retail Orders on the NYSE Arca Equity Market).
Similarly, because the Exchange allows Order Flow Providers (``OFPs'')
to aggregate their volume executed on NYSE Arca with affiliated or
Appointed Market Makers, OFPs may encourage an increased level of
activity from these participants to qualify for various incentives,
including higher credits for Customer orders.\4\ The Exchange proposes
to modify certain of the thresholds for achieving posting credits on
the Exchange as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Per the Fee Schedule, ``[u]nless Professional Customer
executions are specifically delineated, such executions will be
treated as `Customer' executions for fee/credit purposes.'' See Fee
Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: TRADE-RELATED CHARGES FOR STANDARD
OPTIONS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Customer Penny Pilot Posting Tiers (the ``Penny
Credit Tiers'', each a ``Penny Tier''), Customer orders
[[Page 39801]]
that post liquidity and are executed on the Exchange earn a base credit
of $0.25 per contract, with the ability to earn increased credits (up
to $0.50) based on the participant's activity. Currently, there are
eight (8) Penny Credit Tiers, with increasing minimum volume thresholds
associated with each tier.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate Penny Tier 4, which would remove
the $0.46 per contract credit for OTPs that achieve at least 0.60% of
TCADV from Customer posted interest in all issues, plus executed
Average Daily Volume (``ADV'') of Retail Orders of 0.1% ADV of U.S.
Equity Market Share Posted and Executed on NYSE Arca Equity Market.
Consistent with this change, the Exchange proposed to renumber the
remaining higher Tiers (i.e., to re-number current Penny Tiers 5-8 to
Penny Tiers 4-7). The Exchange also proposes to modify certain minimum
volume thresholds in new Penny Tiers 5 and 6. In new Penny Tier 5, in
the alternative qualification, an OTP would earn the $0.48 per contract
credit by achieving at least 0.75% (up from 0.50%) of TCADV from
Customer posted interest in all issues, plus at least 0.45% of TCADV
from Market Maker Total Electronic Volume.\5\ As proposed, in the new
Penny Tier 6, an OTP would earn the $0.49 per contract credit by
achieving at least 0.75% (up from 0.50%) of TCADV from Customer posted
interest in all issues, plus at least 0.60% of TCADV from Market Maker
Total Electronic Volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Per the Fee Schedule, the ``Total Industry Customer equity
and ETF option average daily volume (`TCADV') includes OCC
calculated Customer volume of all types, including Complex Order
Transactions and QCC transactions, in equity and ETF options.'' See
Fee Schedule, endnote 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also offers a Customer Incentive Program (the
``Incentive Program''), which offers OTPs the ability to earn one
additional credit by achieving the minimum thresholds listed.\6\ The
Exchange now proposes to eliminate one of the alternatives.
Specifically, the Exchange would no longer provide an additional $0.03
per contract credit for achieving executed ADV of retail orders of
0.10% ADV of U.S. Equity Market Share Posted and Executed on NYSE Arca
Equity Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange proposes to make a non-substantive change to
the second alternative basis for the Incentive Program by replacing
reference to ``Total Industry Customer equity and ETF option ADV''
with the defined abbreviation of ``TCADV,'' which would add clarity
and internal consistency to the Fee Schedule. See proposed Fee
Schedule, Customer Incentive Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also offers increasing credits to be applied to
executions of Customer posted interest in non-Penny Pilot issues based
on minimum volume thresholds through the Customer Posting Credit Tiers
in Non-Penny Pilot Issues (``Non-Penny Credit Tiers'', each a ``Non-
Penny Tier''). The Exchange proposes to eliminate one Non-Penny Tier
(the current Tier A), which would remove the $0.83 per contract credit
for OTPs that achieve at least 0.70% of TCADV from Customer posted
interest in all issues, plus executed ADV of Retail Orders of 0.1% ADV
of U.S. Equity Market Share Posted and Executed on NYSE Arca Equity
Market. Consistent with this change, the Exchange proposes to re-title
the balance of the Non-Penny Tiers (i.e., to re-title current Non-Penny
Tiers B-F to Non-Penny Tiers A through E).
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to modify the minimum volume
threshold required to achieve new Tier B, such that an OTP would earn
the $0.94 per contract credit by achieving at least 0.75% (up from
0.50%) of TCADV from Customer posted interest in all issues, plus an
ADV from Market Maker Total Electronic Volume equal to 0.45% of TCADV.
The Exchange also proposes to modify the minimum volume threshold for
the new Tier D, such that an OTP would earn the $1.00 per contract
credit by achieving at least 0.75% (up from 0.50%) of TCADV from
Customer posted interest in all issues, plus an ADV from Market Maker
Total Electronic Volume equal to 0.60% of TCADV.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\8\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed modifications to the
minimum threshold qualification for certain of the Penny, and Non-
Penny, Credit Tiers and the Incentive Program are reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because, among other things,
the proposed changes would streamline the available means for an OTP to
qualify for credits on the Exchange, while still offering OTPs
incentives to direct volume to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that it
proposes to remove certain tiers from the various posting credit
programs because such tiers are underutilized. The proposed changes,
therefore, should provide more meaningful criteria for OTPs to qualify
for (and seek to achieve higher) credits by posting desired volume on
the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes would
continue to attract Customer (and Professional Customer) orders to the
Exchange, which results in increased liquidity to the benefit of all
participants by offering greater price discovery, increased
transparency, and an increased opportunity to trade on the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes the proposed changes are reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the modified minimum
volume thresholds for the Penny, and Non-Penny, Tiers and the Incentive
Program would be available to all similarly-situated market
participants on an equal and non-discriminatory basis. The Exchange
believes the proposed modifications are reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because they encourage participants to enhance
their order flow to qualify for the various incentives, including
encouraging more participants to have affiliated or appointed order
flow directed to the Exchange. Further, encouraging OFPs to send higher
volumes of Customer (and Professional Customer) orders to the Exchange
would also contribute to the Exchange's depth of book as well as to the
top of book liquidity.
The proposed changes to the various posting credit incentives
offered on the Exchange are also reasonable as they are consistent with
similar such programs offered on other exchanges.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See e.g., NASDAQ Options Market, Chapter XV Options Pricing,
Sec. 2, Fees and Rebates, available here, https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQTools/PlatformViewer.asp?selectednode=chp_1_1_15&manual=%2Fnasdaq%2Fmain%2Fnasdaq-optionsrules%2F (setting forth various rebates per executed
contract, including for adding Customer and Professional Customer
volume).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes the proposed non-substantive changes
to the Fee Schedule (see supra note 6) are reasonable, equitable, and
not unfairly discriminatory because it would add clarity, transparency
and internal consistency to the Fee Schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the
[[Page 39802]]
proposed changes would encourage competition, including by attracting
additional liquidity to the Exchange, which would continue to make the
Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other things, order
execution and price discovery. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change would impair the ability of any market participants or
competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing
in the financial markets. Further, the incentive would be available to
all similarly-situated participants, and, as such, the proposed change
would not impose a disparate burden on competition either among or
between classes of market participants and may, in fact, encourage
competition. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change merely
modifies existing posting tiers that offer additional credits to OTPs
that (opt to) meet certain volume thresholds. The proposed change does
not impose any new burden or requirement on OTPs, as achieving the
modified tiers is voluntary (i.e., an OTP that does not does not seek
to achieve additional credits by meeting the modified volume thresholds
has no obligation to do so).
The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \10\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \11\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \12\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2018-56 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2018-56. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2018-56 and should be submitted
on or before August 31, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17124 Filed 8-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P