Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 39422-39424 [2018-17050]
Download as PDF
39422
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
19. Pudong Prime Int’l Logistics, Inc.
20. Qinhuangdao Xingtai Trade Co., Ltd.
21. S.D. Linghua M.S.G. Incorporated Co.
22. Shandong Linghua Monosodium
Glutamate Incorporated Company
23. Shanghai Totole Food Ltd.
24. Shijiazhuang Standard Imp & Exp Co.,
Ltd.
25. Sunrise (HK) International Enterprise
Limited
26. Tongliao Meihua Biological Sci-Tech Co.,
Ltd.
27. Zhejiang Medicines & Health
[FR Doc. 2018–17049 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–557–816]
Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia:
Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Scope of the Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from Malaysia. This review covers
the sales of two mandatory respondents,
both of which we preliminarily
determine to have made sales at less
than normal value during the period of
review, covering July 1, 2016, through
June 30, 2017. In addition, we are
rescinding the review in part with
respect to 15 companies for which the
request for review was timely
withdrawn.
DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edythe Artman or Madeline Heeren,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3931 or
(202) 482–9179, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
These preliminary results of review
are made in accordance with section
751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). On September 13,
2017, Commerce published the notice of
initiation for the administrative review.1
For a complete description of the events
that followed the initiation of the
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.2 A list of topics included
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, located in room
B8094 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
The products covered by the scope of
the order are certain steel nails from
Malaysia. For a complete description of
the scope, see Appendix I of this notice.
Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a
review of 19 companies. Subsequently,
the petitioner, Mid Continent Steel &
Wire, Inc., withdrew its request for
review of 15 of the companies. No other
parties had requested a review of these
companies. Thus, in response to the
petitioner’s timely filed withdrawal
request and pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the
administrative review of the following
companies: Airlift Trans Oceanic Pvt.
Ltd.; Astrotech Steels Private Ltd.;
Caribbean International Co. Ltd.;
Dahnay Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; Flyjac
Logistics Private Ltd.; Full Well Freight
(Thailand) Co.; Hecny Transportation;
Jinhai Hardware Co. Ltd.; Orient
Containers Sdn. Bhd.; Orient Express
Container Co., Ltd.; Scanwell Logistics
(Malaysia) Sdn Bhd; Shanghai Haoray
International Trade Co. Ltd.; Sino
Connections Logistics; Tag Fasteners
Sdn. Bhd.; and Topocean Consolidation
Services.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Act. For a full description of the
methodology underlying the
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Steel Nails from Malaysia; 2016–2017’’, dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
preliminary results, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for
the period July 1, 2016, through June 30,
2017, the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist: 3
Producer/exporter
Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax
Industries Sdn. Bhd ..........
Region International Co. Ltd.
and Region System Sdn.
Bhd ....................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
1.33
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce will disclose to parties to
the proceeding any calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results of review within five
days after the date of publication of this
notice.4 Interested parties may submit
case briefs no later than seven days after
the date on which the last verification
report is issued in this administrative
review.5 Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than five days after the
deadline for filing case briefs.6 Parties
who submit case or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.7 Case and rebuttal
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.8
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance within 30
days of the date of publication of this
notice.9 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues
parties intend to discuss. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing
is made, Commerce intends to hold the
hearing at the U.S. Department of
3 Commerce has preliminarily determined to
collapse, and treat as a single entity, affiliates Inmax
Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd.
(collectively, Inmax) and Region International Co.
Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd. (collectively
Region). For a full discussion of the collapsing
criteria, see the company-specific analysis
memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice.
4 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
8 See 19 CFR 351.303.
9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date
and time to be determined.10 Parties
should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
Unless extended, Commerce intends
to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will
include the results of our analysis of all
issues raised in the case briefs, within
120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.11 The
final results of this review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise
covered by the final results of this
review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.12
We intend to issue instructions to CBP
15 days after the publication date of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Inmax and Region
listed above will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were reviewed; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or in the
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be the all-others rate of 2.66 percent.
10 See
19 CFR 351.310(d).
19 CFR 351.212(b).
12 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 3, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I—Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
antidumping duty order is certain steel nails
having a nominal shaft length not exceeding
12 inches.13 Certain steel nails include, but
are not limited to, nails made from round
wire and nails that are cut from flat-rolled
steel. Certain steel nails may be of one piece
construction or constructed of two or more
pieces. Certain steel nails may be produced
from any type of steel, and may have any
type of surface finish, head type, shank, point
type and shaft diameter. Finishes include,
but are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc
(galvanized, including but not limited to
electroplating or hot dipping one or more
times), phosphate, cement, and paint. Certain
steel nails may have one or more surface
finishes. Head styles include, but are not
limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval,
brad, headless, double, countersunk, and
sinker. Shank styles include, but are not
limited to, smooth, barbed, screw threaded,
ring shank and fluted. Screw-threaded nails
subject to this proceeding are driven using
direct force and not by turning the nail using
a tool that engages with the head. Point styles
include, but are not limited to, diamond,
needle, chisel and blunt or no point. Certain
steel nails may be sold in bulk, or they may
be collated in any manner using any material.
Excluded from the scope of this order are
certain steel nails packaged in combination
with one or more non-subject articles, if the
total number of nails of all types, in aggregate
regardless of size, is less than 25. If packaged
in combination with one or more non-subject
articles, certain steel nails remain subject
13 The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat
heads or parallel shoulders under the head shall be
measured from under the head or shoulder to the
tip of the point. The shaft length of all other certain
steel nails shall be measured overall.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39423
merchandise if the total number of nails of
all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is
equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise
excluded based on the other exclusions
below.
Also excluded from the scope are certain
steel nails with a nominal shaft length of one
inch or less that are (a) a component of an
unassembled article, (b) the total number of
nails is sixty (60) or less, and (c) the imported
unassembled article falls into one of the
following eight groupings: (1) Builders’
joinery and carpentry of wood that are
classifiable as windows, French-windows
and their frames; (2) builders’ joinery and
carpentry of wood that are classifiable as
doors and their frames and thresholds; (3)
swivel seats with variable height adjustment;
(4) seats that are convertible into beds (with
the exception of those classifiable as garden
seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of
cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6)
other seats with wooden frames (with the
exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft
or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than
seats) of wood (with the exception of i)
medical, surgical, dental or veterinary
furniture; and ii) barbers’ chairs and similar
chairs, having rotating as well as both
reclining and elevating movements); or (8)
furniture (other than seats) of materials other
than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture
of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials).
The aforementioned imported unassembled
articles are currently classified under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10,
4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59,
9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50,
9403.60, 9403.81 or 9403.89.
Also excluded from the scope of this order
are steel nails that meet the specifications of
Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in Tables
29 through 33 of ASTM Standard F1667
(2013 revision).
Also excluded from the scope of this order
are nails suitable for use in powder-actuated
hand tools, whether or not threaded, which
are currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.20.00 and
7317.00.30.00.
Also excluded from the scope of this order
are nails having a case hardness greater than
or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C
scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or
equal to 0.5 percent, a round head, a
secondary reduced-diameter raised head
section, a centered shank, and a smooth
symmetrical point, suitable for use in gasactuated hand tools.
Also excluded from the scope of this order
are corrugated nails. A corrugated nail is
made up of a small strip of corrugated steel
with sharp points on one side.
Also excluded from the scope of this order
are thumb tacks, which are currently
classified under HTSUS subheading
7317.00.10.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order are
currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03,
7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08,
7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19,
7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70,
7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
39424
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2018 / Notices
7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain
steel nails subject to this order also may be
classified under HTSUS subheadings
7907.00.60.00, 7806.00.80.00, 7318.29.00.00,
8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
5. Collapsing of Affiliated Companies
6. Date of Sale
7. Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
8. Product Comparisons
9. Export Price
10. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Sales to Affiliates
D. Cost of Production
1. Cost Averaging Methodology
A. Significance of Cost Changes
B. Linkage Between Sales and Cost
Information
2. Calculation of COP
3. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
4. Results of the Cost of Production Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
11. Currency Conversion
12. Verification
13. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–17050 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: International Dolphin
Conservation Program.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0387.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (extension of
a currently approved information
collections).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Aug 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Number of Respondents: 279.
Average Hours per Response: 35
minutes for a vessel permit application;
10 minutes for an operator permit
application, a notification of vessel
arrival or departure, a change in permit
operator; a notification of a net
modification or a monthly tuna storage
removal report; 30 minutes for a request
for a waiver to transit the ETP without
a permit (and subsequent radio
reporting) or for a special report
documenting the origin of tuna (if
requested by the NOAA Administrator);
10 hours for an experimental fishing
operation waiver; 15 minutes for a
request for a Dolphin Mortality Limit;
35 minutes for written notification to
request active status for a small tuna
purse seine vessel; 5 minutes for written
notification to request inactive status for
a small tuna purse seine vessel or for
written notification of the intent to
transfer a tuna purse seine vessel to
foreign registry and flag; 60 minutes for
a tuna tracking form or for a monthly
tuna receiving report; 30 minutes for
IMO application or exemption request;
30 minutes for chain of custody
recordkeeping reporting requirement.
Burden Hours: 248.
Needs and Uses: This request is to
extend this information collection.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) collects
information to implement the
International Dolphin Conservation
Program Act (Act). The Act allows entry
of yellowfin tuna into the United States
(U.S.), under specific conditions, from
nations in the International Dolphin
Conservation Program that would
otherwise be under embargo. The Act
also allows U.S. fishing vessels to
participate in the yellowfin tuna fishery
in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean
(ETP) on terms equivalent with the
vessels of other nations. NOAA collects
information to allow tracking and
verification of ‘‘dolphin-safe’’ and ‘‘nondolphin safe’’ tuna products from catch
through the U.S. market.
The regulations implementing the Act
are at 50 CFR parts 216 and 300. The
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements at 50 CFR parts 216 and
300 form the basis for this collection of
information. This collection includes
permit applications, notifications, tuna
tracking forms, reports, and
certifications that provide information
on vessel characteristics and operations
in the ETP, the origin of tuna and tuna
products, chain of custody
recordkeeping requirements and certain
other information necessary to
implement the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households.
Frequency: On occasion, monthly and
upon request.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: August 6, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–17056 Filed 8–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG383
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to the Gustavus
Ferry Terminal Improvements Project
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed issuance of an
Incidental Harassment Authorization;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received a request
from the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities
(ADOT&PF) to issue an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) for
activities that were not conducted under
an existing IHA. NMFS previously
issued an IHA to ADOT&PF to
incidentally take seven species of
marine mammal, by Level A and Level
B harassment, during construction
activities associated with the Gustavus
Ferry Terminal Improvements project in
Gustavus, Alaska. The IHA, issued on
April 4, 2017 (82 FR 17209; April 10,
2017), is valid from December 15, 2017
through December 14, 2018. However,
ADOT&PF was unable to conduct any of
the work and, therefore, has requested
that NMFS re-issue the IHA with the
dates changed to accommodate the
analyzed work with minor
modifications to the number of piles
driven. The proposed IHA would
authorize work for the ferry
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39422-39424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17050]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-557-816]
Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from Malaysia. This review covers the sales of two mandatory
respondents, both of which we preliminarily determine to have made
sales at less than normal value during the period of review, covering
July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. In addition, we are rescinding the
review in part with respect to 15 companies for which the request for
review was timely withdrawn.
DATES: Applicable August 9, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Madeline Heeren, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3931 or (202)
482-9179, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
These preliminary results of review are made in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On
September 13, 2017, Commerce published the notice of initiation for the
administrative review.\1\ For a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\2\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, located in room B8094 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation
Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia; 2016-2017'', dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the scope of the order are certain steel
nails from Malaysia. For a complete description of the scope, see
Appendix I of this notice.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a review of 19 companies.
Subsequently, the petitioner, Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc.,
withdrew its request for review of 15 of the companies. No other
parties had requested a review of these companies. Thus, in response to
the petitioner's timely filed withdrawal request and pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the administrative review of the
following companies: Airlift Trans Oceanic Pvt. Ltd.; Astrotech Steels
Private Ltd.; Caribbean International Co. Ltd.; Dahnay Logistics Pvt.
Ltd.; Flyjac Logistics Private Ltd.; Full Well Freight (Thailand) Co.;
Hecny Transportation; Jinhai Hardware Co. Ltd.; Orient Containers Sdn.
Bhd.; Orient Express Container Co., Ltd.; Scanwell Logistics (Malaysia)
Sdn Bhd; Shanghai Haoray International Trade Co. Ltd.; Sino Connections
Logistics; Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd.; and Topocean Consolidation
Services.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying the preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for the period July 1, 2016,
through June 30, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist: \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Commerce has preliminarily determined to collapse, and treat
as a single entity, affiliates Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries
Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Inmax) and Region International Co. Ltd.
and Region System Sdn. Bhd. (collectively Region). For a full
discussion of the collapsing criteria, see the company-specific
analysis memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd........... 0.00
Region International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd 1.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce will disclose to parties to the proceeding any
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of
review within five days after the date of publication of this
notice.\4\ Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than
seven days after the date on which the last verification report is
issued in this administrative review.\5\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days
after the deadline for filing case briefs.\6\ Parties who submit case
or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with
each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs
should be filed using ACCESS.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\9\
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues
parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited
to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at
the U.S. Department of
[[Page 39423]]
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date
and time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm by telephone the
date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of
this administrative review, which will include the results of our
analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.\11\ The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable.\12\ We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
\12\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Inmax and Region
listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 2.66 percent.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and sections 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 3, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order is certain
steel nails having a nominal shaft length not exceeding 12
inches.\13\ Certain steel nails include, but are not limited to,
nails made from round wire and nails that are cut from flat-rolled
steel. Certain steel nails may be of one piece construction or
constructed of two or more pieces. Certain steel nails may be
produced from any type of steel, and may have any type of surface
finish, head type, shank, point type and shaft diameter. Finishes
include, but are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized,
including but not limited to electroplating or hot dipping one or
more times), phosphate, cement, and paint. Certain steel nails may
have one or more surface finishes. Head styles include, but are not
limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless, double,
countersunk, and sinker. Shank styles include, but are not limited
to, smooth, barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and fluted. Screw-
threaded nails subject to this proceeding are driven using direct
force and not by turning the nail using a tool that engages with the
head. Point styles include, but are not limited to, diamond, needle,
chisel and blunt or no point. Certain steel nails may be sold in
bulk, or they may be collated in any manner using any material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat heads or
parallel shoulders under the head shall be measured from under the
head or shoulder to the tip of the point. The shaft length of all
other certain steel nails shall be measured overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excluded from the scope of this order are certain steel nails
packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles, if
the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of
size, is less than 25. If packaged in combination with one or more
non-subject articles, certain steel nails remain subject merchandise
if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless
of size, is equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise excluded
based on the other exclusions below.
Also excluded from the scope are certain steel nails with a
nominal shaft length of one inch or less that are (a) a component of
an unassembled article, (b) the total number of nails is sixty (60)
or less, and (c) the imported unassembled article falls into one of
the following eight groupings: (1) Builders' joinery and carpentry
of wood that are classifiable as windows, French-windows and their
frames; (2) builders' joinery and carpentry of wood that are
classifiable as doors and their frames and thresholds; (3) swivel
seats with variable height adjustment; (4) seats that are
convertible into beds (with the exception of those classifiable as
garden seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo
or similar materials; (6) other seats with wooden frames (with the
exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft or motor vehicles);
(7) furniture (other than seats) of wood (with the exception of i)
medical, surgical, dental or veterinary furniture; and ii) barbers'
chairs and similar chairs, having rotating as well as both reclining
and elevating movements); or (8) furniture (other than seats) of
materials other than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture of
cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The aforementioned
imported unassembled articles are currently classified under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59,
9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81 or
9403.89.
Also excluded from the scope of this order are steel nails that
meet the specifications of Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in
Tables 29 through 33 of ASTM Standard F1667 (2013 revision).
Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails suitable
for use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded,
which are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.20.00
and 7317.00.30.00.
Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails having a
case hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C
scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to 0.5 percent,
a round head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a
centered shank, and a smooth symmetrical point, suitable for use in
gas-actuated hand tools.
Also excluded from the scope of this order are corrugated nails.
A corrugated nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated steel
with sharp points on one side.
Also excluded from the scope of this order are thumb tacks,
which are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.10.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order are currently
classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03,
7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11,
7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30,
7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70,
7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
[[Page 39424]]
7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject to this
order also may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00,
7806.00.80.00, 7318.29.00.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS
subheadings.
While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order
is dispositive.
Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
5. Collapsing of Affiliated Companies
6. Date of Sale
7. Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
8. Product Comparisons
9. Export Price
10. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Sales to Affiliates
D. Cost of Production
1. Cost Averaging Methodology
A. Significance of Cost Changes
B. Linkage Between Sales and Cost Information
2. Calculation of COP
3. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
4. Results of the Cost of Production Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
11. Currency Conversion
12. Verification
13. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-17050 Filed 8-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P