Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Institute a Rescission Proceeding; Temporary Rescission of the Remedial Orders; Termination of the Proceeding, 38178-38179 [2018-16611]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
38178
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the recommended
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the recommended
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would impact consumers in the
United States.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business on
September 6, 2018.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
1063’’) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/documents/handbook_on_
filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with
questions regarding filing should
contact the Secretary ((202) 205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All information,
including confidential business
information and documents for which
confidential treatment is properly
sought, submitted to the Commission for
purposes of this Investigation may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes (all contract personnel will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements). All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 31, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–16651 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–929 (Rescission
Proceeding)]
Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Commission
Determination To Institute a
Rescission Proceeding; Temporary
Rescission of the Remedial Orders;
Termination of the Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to institute
a rescission proceeding, to temporarily
rescind a March 17, 2016 limited
exclusion order and three cease-anddesist orders (‘‘the remedial orders’’),
and to terminate the rescission
proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted the original
investigation on September 9, 2014,
based on a complaint filed by Adrian
Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez
Enterprises, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘ARM’’).
79 FR 53445–46. The complaint alleged
that several respondents, including Eko
Brands, LLC (‘‘Eko’’) Evermuch
Technology Co., Ltd. and Ever Much
Company Ltd. (together, ‘‘Evermuch’’),
violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by
infringing certain claims of U.S. Patent
No. 8,720,320 (‘‘the ’320 patent’’). Id.
Eko Brands and Evermuch did not
respond to the complaint and notice of
investigation, and were found in
default. Notice (May 18, 2015). On
March 17, 2016, the Commission issued
a limited exclusion order prohibiting
Eko and Evermuch from importing
certain beverage brewing capsules,
components thereof, and products
containing same that infringed claims 8
or 19 of the ’320 patent, and also issued
three cease-and-desist orders against
Eko and the two Evermuch entities
prohibiting the sale and distribution
within the United States of articles that
infringe claims 8 or 19. 81 FR 15742–
43.
On April 2, 2015, Eko filed in district
court for declaratory relief stating, inter
alia, that Eko does not infringe certain
claims of the ’320 patent and that
certain claims of the ’320 patent are
invalid. Eko Brands v. Adrian Rivera
Maynez Enterprises Inc. et al., Case No.
2:15-cv-00522, Dkt. #1 (W.D. Wash.). On
June 14, 2018, the district court issued
an order finding that claims 5, 8, 18, and
19 of the ’320 patent are invalid as
obvious. Id. at Dkt. #251.
On June 28, 2018, Eko petitioned the
Commission to rescind the March 17,
2016 remedial orders based on the
district court’s invalidity judgment. On
July 9, 2018, ARM filed a response that
did not dispute Eko’s petition, but
argued that any rescission be temporary
pending the resolution of ARM’s appeal
of the district court invalidity judgment.
Having considered the petition and
response, the Commission has
determined to institute a rescission
proceeding, and has determined that the
circumstances warrant temporarily
rescinding the remedial orders pending
the appeal of the district court invalidity
judgment. The rescission proceeding is
hereby terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
38179
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 150 / Friday, August 3, 2018 / Notices
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
Registered bulk manufacturers of
the affected basic classes, and
applicants therefore, may file written
comments on or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration in
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on
or before October 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/DRW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152.
DATES:
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 30, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–16611 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. DEA–392]
The Attorney General has delegated
his authority under the Controlled
Substances Act to the Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to
exercise all necessary functions with
respect to the promulgation and
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Application: AMRI
Rensselaer, Inc.
ACTION:
Notice of application.
implementation of 21 CFR part 1301,
incident to the registration of
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers,
importers, and exporters of controlled
substances (other than final orders in
connection with suspension, denial, or
revocation of registration) has been
redelegated to the Assistant
Administrator of the DEA Diversion
Control Division (‘‘Assistant
Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
In accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33(a), this is notice that on June
25, 2018, AMRI Rensselaer, Inc., 33
Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New
York 12144 applied to be registered as
a bulk manufacturer of the following
basic classes of controlled substances:
Controlled substance
Drug code
Marihuana ........................................................................................................................................................................
Tetrahydrocannabinols ....................................................................................................................................................
Amphetamine ...................................................................................................................................................................
Lisdexamfetamine ............................................................................................................................................................
Pentobarbital ....................................................................................................................................................................
4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP) .....................................................................................................................
Codeine ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Oxycodone .......................................................................................................................................................................
Hydromorphone ...............................................................................................................................................................
Hydrocodone ...................................................................................................................................................................
Meperidine .......................................................................................................................................................................
Morphine ..........................................................................................................................................................................
The company plans to manufacture
bulk controlled substances for use in
product development and for
distribution to its customers.
In reference to drug codes 7360
(marihuana) and 7370 (THC), the
company plans to bulk manufacture
these drugs as synthetics. No other
activities for these drug codes are
authorized for this registration.
Dated: July 23, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–16635 Filed 8–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act
On July 30, 2018, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the Central District of
California in the lawsuit entitled United
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
States v. Honeywell International, Inc.,
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-06556.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) for the recovery of costs that
the United States incurred responding
to releases of hazardous substances at
Installation Restoration Program (IRP)
Site 50 at Vandenberg Air Force Base in
Santa Barbara County, California. The
consent decree requires the defendant
Honeywell International, Inc. to pay
$250,000 to the United States. In return,
the United States agrees not to sue the
defendant under sections 106 and 107 of
CERCLA at IRP Site 50 at Vandenberg
Air Force Base.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed consent decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. Honeywell
International, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–
3–10477/5. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7360
7370
1100
1205
2270
8333
9050
9143
9150
9193
9230
9300
Schedule
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the proposed consent decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed consent decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $5.25 (25 cents per page
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38178-38179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-929 (Rescission Proceeding)]
Certain Beverage Brewing Capsules, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Institute a
Rescission Proceeding; Temporary Rescission of the Remedial Orders;
Termination of the Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to institute a rescission proceeding, to
temporarily rescind a March 17, 2016 limited exclusion order and three
cease-and-desist orders (``the remedial orders''), and to terminate the
rescission proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the original
investigation on September 9, 2014, based on a complaint filed by
Adrian Rivera and Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc. (collectively,
``ARM''). 79 FR 53445-46. The complaint alleged that several
respondents, including Eko Brands, LLC (``Eko'') Evermuch Technology
Co., Ltd. and Ever Much Company Ltd. (together, ``Evermuch''), violated
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by
infringing certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,720,320 (``the '320
patent''). Id. Eko Brands and Evermuch did not respond to the complaint
and notice of investigation, and were found in default. Notice (May 18,
2015). On March 17, 2016, the Commission issued a limited exclusion
order prohibiting Eko and Evermuch from importing certain beverage
brewing capsules, components thereof, and products containing same that
infringed claims 8 or 19 of the '320 patent, and also issued three
cease-and-desist orders against Eko and the two Evermuch entities
prohibiting the sale and distribution within the United States of
articles that infringe claims 8 or 19. 81 FR 15742-43.
On April 2, 2015, Eko filed in district court for declaratory
relief stating, inter alia, that Eko does not infringe certain claims
of the '320 patent and that certain claims of the '320 patent are
invalid. Eko Brands v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises Inc. et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-00522, Dkt. #1 (W.D. Wash.). On June 14, 2018, the
district court issued an order finding that claims 5, 8, 18, and 19 of
the '320 patent are invalid as obvious. Id. at Dkt. #251.
On June 28, 2018, Eko petitioned the Commission to rescind the
March 17, 2016 remedial orders based on the district court's invalidity
judgment. On July 9, 2018, ARM filed a response that did not dispute
Eko's petition, but argued that any rescission be temporary pending the
resolution of ARM's appeal of the district court invalidity judgment.
Having considered the petition and response, the Commission has
determined to institute a rescission proceeding, and has determined
that the circumstances warrant temporarily rescinding the remedial
orders pending the appeal of the district court invalidity judgment.
The rescission proceeding is hereby terminated.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part
[[Page 38179]]
210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 30, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-16611 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P