Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change, 37516-37517 [2018-16485]
Download as PDF
37516
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1105]
Certain Programmable Logic
Controller (PLCs), Components
Thereof, and Products Containing
Same; Commission Determination Not
To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion of Non-Party North
Coast To Intervene
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 10) granting a motion of nonparty North Coast Electric Company
(‘‘North Coast’’) to intervene in the
above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 29, 2018, based on a
complaint filed by Radwell
International, Inc., of Willingboro, New
Jersey (‘‘Radwell’’). 83 FR 13515–16
(Mar. 29, 2018). The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain programmable
logic controllers (PLCs), components
thereof, and products containing same
by reason of: (l) A conspiracy to fix
resale prices in violation of Section l of
the Sherman Act; (2) a conspiracy to
boycott resellers in violation of Section
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Jul 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
1 of the Sherman Act; and (3)
monopolization in violation of Section 2
of the Sherman Act, the threat or effect
of which is to destroy or substantially
injure a domestic industry in the United
States, or to restrain or monopolize
trade and commerce in the United
States. Id. The notice of investigation
names Rockwell Automation, Inc. of
Milwaukee, Wisconsin as respondent.
Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations was also named as a party
to the investigation. Id.
On May 25, 2018, Radwell filed a
motion requesting the ALJ to certify to
the Commission a request for judicial
enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum
directed to non-party North Coast. On
June 8, 2018, pursuant to Commission
rules 210.15 and 210.19 (19 CFR 210.15,
210.19), North Coast filed an unopposed
motion to intervene for the limited
purpose of submitting an opposition to
the pending motion to certify, along
with the opposition. No party filed a
response concerning the motion to
intervene.
On July 9, 2018, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting North Coast’s
motion to intervene. The ALJ found that
North Coast’s interests are directly at
issue in the investigation and that no
party would suffer prejudice as a result
of North Coast’s intervention for the
limited purpose of opposing the motion
to certify. No petitions for review were
filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 27, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–16483 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1098]
Certain Subsea Telecommunication
Systems and Components Thereof;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend
the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation To Reflect a Corporate
Name Change
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 21) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
granting complainant’s unopposed
motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
reflect the corporate name change of
complainant Neptune Subsea
Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 26, 2018, based on a
complaint, as supplemented, filed on
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions
Ltd. of the United Kingdom; Neptune
Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom;
and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas
(‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26,
2018). The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of Section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon
the importation into the United States,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain subsea
telecommunication systems and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more claims of
U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent
No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No.
8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798;
and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by section 337. The Notice of
Investigation named Nokia Corporation
of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and
Networks B.V. of Hoofddorp, The
Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy of Espoo, Finland; AlcatelLucent Submarine Networks SAS of
Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Nokia
Solutions and Networks US LLC of
Phoenix, Arizona; NEC Corporation of
Tokyo, Japan; NEC Networks & System
Integration Corporation of Tokyo, Japan;
and NEC Corporation of America of
Irving, Texas as respondents. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations was
named as a party in this investigation.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
On May 30, 2018, the complainants
filed an unopposed motion for leave to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to reflect a corporate name
change of one of the complainants from
Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to
Xtera Topco Ltd.
On July 10, 2018, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting complainants’
unopposed motion. The ALJ found that
good cause exists to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation
and that there was no evidence that the
proposed amendment would harm the
public interest or prejudice to the
parties in the investigation. No petitions
for review were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 27, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–16485 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Jul 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–365–366 and
731–TA–734–735 (Fourth Review)]
Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey;
Institution of Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
and countervailing duty orders on
certain pasta from Italy and Turkey
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission.
DATES: Instituted August 1, 2018. To be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is August 31, 2018.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
October 16, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On July 24, 1996, the
Department of Commerce issued
countervailing and antidumping duty
orders on imports of certain pasta from
Italy and Turkey (61 FR 38544).
Following first five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective November 16, 2001, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
countervailing and antidumping duty
orders on imports of certain pasta from
Italy and Turkey (66 FR 57703).
Following second five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective October 12, 2007, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37517
countervailing and antidumping duty
orders on certain pasta from Italy and
Turkey (72 FR 58052). Following third
five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective September 17,
2013, Commerce issued a continuation
of the countervailing and antidumping
duty orders on certain pasta from Italy
and Turkey (78 FR 57129). The
Commission is now conducting fourth
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to
determine whether revocation of the
orders would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
Provisions concerning the conduct of
this proceeding may be found in the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts
A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts
A and F. The Commission will assess
the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct full or
expedited reviews. The Commission’s
determinations in any expedited
reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by the Department of
Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Italy and Turkey.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original and
subsequent five-year review
determinations, the Commission
defined the Domestic Like Product as all
dry pasta. One Commissioner defined
the Domestic Like Product differently in
the original and expedited first five-year
review determinations.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original and subsequent
five-year review determinations, the
Commission defined the Domestic
Industry as all domestic producers of
dry pasta. One Commissioner defined
the Domestic Industry differently in the
original and expedited first five-year
review determinations.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37516-37517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16485]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1098]
Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof;
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 21) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend
the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect the corporate name
change of complainant Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco
Ltd.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom;
Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen,
Texas (``complainants''). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based upon the
importation into the United States,
[[Page 37517]]
the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain subsea telecommunication systems and components
thereof by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent
No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171;
U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as
required by section 337. The Notice of Investigation named Nokia
Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo,
Finland; Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt,
France; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; NEC
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; NEC Networks & System Integration
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; and NEC Corporation of America of Irving,
Texas as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was
named as a party in this investigation.
On May 30, 2018, the complainants filed an unopposed motion for
leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a
corporate name change of one of the complainants from Neptune Subsea
Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd.
On July 10, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting
complainants' unopposed motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to
amend the complaint and notice of investigation and that there was no
evidence that the proposed amendment would harm the public interest or
prejudice to the parties in the investigation. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 27, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-16485 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P