Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change, 37516-37517 [2018-16485]

Download as PDF 37516 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1105] Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion of Non-Party North Coast To Intervene U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) granting a motion of nonparty North Coast Electric Company (‘‘North Coast’’) to intervene in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 29, 2018, based on a complaint filed by Radwell International, Inc., of Willingboro, New Jersey (‘‘Radwell’’). 83 FR 13515–16 (Mar. 29, 2018). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain programmable logic controllers (PLCs), components thereof, and products containing same by reason of: (l) A conspiracy to fix resale prices in violation of Section l of the Sherman Act; (2) a conspiracy to boycott resellers in violation of Section sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Jul 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 1 of the Sherman Act; and (3) monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure a domestic industry in the United States, or to restrain or monopolize trade and commerce in the United States. Id. The notice of investigation names Rockwell Automation, Inc. of Milwaukee, Wisconsin as respondent. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a party to the investigation. Id. On May 25, 2018, Radwell filed a motion requesting the ALJ to certify to the Commission a request for judicial enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum directed to non-party North Coast. On June 8, 2018, pursuant to Commission rules 210.15 and 210.19 (19 CFR 210.15, 210.19), North Coast filed an unopposed motion to intervene for the limited purpose of submitting an opposition to the pending motion to certify, along with the opposition. No party filed a response concerning the motion to intervene. On July 9, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting North Coast’s motion to intervene. The ALJ found that North Coast’s interests are directly at issue in the investigation and that no party would suffer prejudice as a result of North Coast’s intervention for the limited purpose of opposing the motion to certify. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 27, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–16483 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1098] Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 21) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), granting complainant’s unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect the corporate name change of complainant Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom; Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas (‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon the importation into the United States, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2018 / Notices the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The Notice of Investigation named Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo, Finland; AlcatelLucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; NEC Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; NEC Networks & System Integration Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; and NEC Corporation of America of Irving, Texas as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party in this investigation. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES On May 30, 2018, the complainants filed an unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate name change of one of the complainants from Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd. On July 10, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting complainants’ unopposed motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to amend the complaint and notice of investigation and that there was no evidence that the proposed amendment would harm the public interest or prejudice to the parties in the investigation. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 27, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–16485 Filed 7–31–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Jul 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–365–366 and 731–TA–734–735 (Fourth Review)] Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey; Institution of Five-Year Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain pasta from Italy and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES: Instituted August 1, 2018. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is August 31, 2018. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by October 16, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On July 24, 1996, the Department of Commerce issued countervailing and antidumping duty orders on imports of certain pasta from Italy and Turkey (61 FR 38544). Following first five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective November 16, 2001, Commerce issued a continuation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on imports of certain pasta from Italy and Turkey (66 FR 57703). Following second five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective October 12, 2007, Commerce issued a continuation of the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37517 countervailing and antidumping duty orders on certain pasta from Italy and Turkey (72 FR 58052). Following third five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective September 17, 2013, Commerce issued a continuation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on certain pasta from Italy and Turkey (78 FR 57129). The Commission is now conducting fourth reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by the Department of Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Italy and Turkey. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original and subsequent five-year review determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as all dry pasta. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Like Product differently in the original and expedited first five-year review determinations. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original and subsequent five-year review determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of dry pasta. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Industry differently in the original and expedited first five-year review determinations. E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37516-37517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1098]


Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation To Reflect a Corporate Name Change

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 21) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend 
the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect the corporate name 
change of complainant Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco 
Ltd.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on 
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom; 
Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, 
Texas (``complainants''). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based upon the 
importation into the United States,

[[Page 37517]]

the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain subsea telecommunication systems and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent 
No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; 
U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by section 337. The Notice of Investigation named Nokia 
Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of 
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo, 
Finland; Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, 
France; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; NEC 
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; NEC Networks & System Integration 
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; and NEC Corporation of America of Irving, 
Texas as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was 
named as a party in this investigation.
    On May 30, 2018, the complainants filed an unopposed motion for 
leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a 
corporate name change of one of the complainants from Neptune Subsea 
Acquisitions Ltd. to Xtera Topco Ltd.
    On July 10, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting 
complainants' unopposed motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to 
amend the complaint and notice of investigation and that there was no 
evidence that the proposed amendment would harm the public interest or 
prejudice to the parties in the investigation. No petitions for review 
were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 27, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-16485 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.