Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the Supplemental List of Arbitrators, 35210-35212 [2018-15927]
Download as PDF
35210
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices
Assessment Rates
Commerce intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP, 15 days after
publication of these final results of
review, to liquidate shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after January 1, 2016, through December
31, 2016, at the ad valorem rates listed
above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Commerce also intends to instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts indicated above for each
company listed on shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review. For
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company,
as appropriate. Accordingly, the cash
deposit requirements that will be
applied to companies covered by this
order, but not examined in this
administrative review, are those
established in the most recently
completed segment of the proceeding
for each company. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 13, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Analysis of Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
Comment 1: Continuation of Application of
AFA for Mandatory Respondents
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–15798 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield; Invitation for Applications for
Inclusion on the Supplemental List of
Arbitrators
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on a
continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before September 24,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to David Ritchie, International
Trade Administration, 202–482–4936 or
david.ritchie@trade.gov. More
information on the arbitration
mechanism may be found at https://
www.trade.gov/td/services/odsi/swissus-privacyshield-framework.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC) and the
Swiss Administration (Swiss) to provide
companies in both Switzerland and the
United States with a mechanism to
comply with data protection
requirements when transferring
personal data from Switzerland to the
United States in support of transatlantic
commerce. On January 12, 2017, the
Swiss deemed the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework (Swiss Privacy
Shield) adequate to enable data transfers
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under Swiss law, and on April 12, 2017,
the DOC began accepting selfcertifications from U.S. companies to
join the program (82 FR 16375; April 12,
2017). For more information on the
Privacy Shield, visit
www.privacyshield.gov.
As described in Annex I of the Swiss
Privacy Shield, the DOC and the Swiss
committed to implement an arbitration
mechanism to provide Swiss
individuals with the ability to invoke
binding arbitration to determine, for
residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations
under the Privacy Shield. Organizations
voluntarily self-certify to the Swiss
Privacy Shield and, upon certification,
the commitments the organization has
made to comply with the Swiss Privacy
Shield become legally enforceable under
U.S. law. Organizations that self-certify
to the Swiss Privacy Shield commit to
binding arbitration of residual claims if
the individual chooses to exercise that
option. Under the arbitration option, a
Privacy Shield Panel a (consisting of one
or three arbitrators, as agreed by the
parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary
equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the
individual’s data in question) necessary
to remedy the violation of the Swiss
Privacy Shield only with respect to the
individual. The parties will select the
arbitrators from the list of arbitrators
described below.
The DOC and the Swiss
Administration are developing a list of
up to five arbitrators to supplement the
list of arbitrators developed under the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. To
be eligible for inclusion on the
supplemental list, applicants must be
admitted to practice law in the United
States and have expertise in both U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss data
protection law. Applicants shall not be
subject to any instructions from, or be
affiliated with, any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., Switzerland,
EU, or any EU Member State or any
other governmental authority, public
authority or enforcement authority.
The DOC received emergency
approval for this information collection
on March 26, 2018 under Control
Number 0625–0278. Upon receiving that
approval, the DOC accepted
applications submitted by April 30,
2018 for inclusion on the Supplemental
List of Arbitrators. The DOC is currently
evaluating applicants who submitted by
April 30, 2018 and is thus not currently
a The Privacy Shield Panel would govern
arbitration proceedings brought under either the
Swiss-U.S. or EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
seeking additional applications.
However, the DOC is now submitting a
request for a 3-year approval through
OMB’s general PRA clearance process,
because it may seek additional
applications in the future as
appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the
Supplemental List of Arbitrators,
eligible individuals are evaluated on the
basis of independence, integrity, and
expertise:
Independence: Freedom from bias and
prejudice.
Integrity: Held in the highest regard
by peers for integrity, fairness and good
judgment.
Demonstrates high ethical standards
and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise
Required: Admission to practice law
in the United States.
Level of demonstrated expertise in
U.S. privacy law and European or Swiss
data protection law.
Other expertise that may be
considered includes any of the
following:
Relevant educational degrees and
professional licenses.
Relevant professional or academic
experience or legal practice.
Relevant training or experience in
arbitration or other forms of dispute
resolution.
Evaluation of applications for
inclusion on the list of arbitrators is
undertaken by the DOC and the Swiss
Administration. Selected applicants
remain on the list for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances,
change in eligibility, or for cause,
renewable for one additional period of
3 years.
The DOC selected the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution-American
Arbitration Association (ICDR–AAA) as
administrator for Privacy Shield
arbitrations brought under either the
Swiss-U.S. or EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks.b Among other things, the
ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection
and timely payment of arbitrator fees
and other expenses. Arbitrators are
expected to commit their time and effort
when included on the supplemental
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators and to take reasonable steps
to minimize the costs or fees of the
arbitration.
Arbitrators are subject to a code of
conduct consistent with Annex I of the
b For more information about the selection
process and the role of the administrator, see
https://www.privacyshield.gov/Arbitration-FactSheet.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
and generally accepted ethical standards
for arbitrators. The DOC and the Swiss
Administration agreed to adopt the
arbitral procedures adopted under the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to
govern the arbitral proceedings, subject
to considerations identified in Annex I
of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, including that materials
submitted to arbitrators will be treated
confidentially and will only be used in
connection with the arbitration. For
more information, please visit https://
www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=GArbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration
procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework.)
Applications
Applications must be typewritten and
should be headed ‘‘Application for
Inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Supplemental List of
Arbitrators.’’ Applications should
include the following information, and
each section of the application should
be numbered as indicated:
—Name of applicant.
—Address, telephone number, and
email address.
1. Independence
—Description of the applicant’s
affiliations with any organization that
has self-certified under either the
Swiss-U.S. or EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks, or the U.S., Switzerland,
any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
—On a separate page, the names,
addresses, telephone, and fax
numbers of three individuals willing
to provide information concerning the
applicant’s qualifications for service,
including the applicant’s character,
reputation, reliability, and judgment.
—Description of the applicant’s
willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an
arbitrator.
3. Expertise
—Demonstration of admittance to
practice law in the United States.
—Relevant academic degrees and
professional training and licensing.
—Current employment, including title,
description of responsibility, name
and address of employer, and name
and telephone number of supervisor
or other reference.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35211
—Employment history, including the
dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of
responsibilities.
—Description of expertise in U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss
data protection law.
—Description of training or experience
in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution, if applicable.
—A list of publications, testimony, and
speeches, if any, concerning U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss
data protection law, with copies
appended.
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the DOC is not
currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future
as appropriate. OMB reviewed and
approved this information collection on
an emergency basis as of March 26, 2018
under Control Number 0625–0278. As
the emergency approval is only valid for
180 days, the DOC is now submitting a
request for a 3-year approval through
OMB’s full PRA clearance process.
Future applications would be submitted
to the U.S. Department of Commerce,
either by email or by fax. More
information on the arbitration
mechanism may be found at https://
www.trade.gov/td/services/odsi/swissus-privacyshield-framework.pdf.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625–0278.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Private Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
Estimated Time per Response: 240
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 80.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
35212
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–15927 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–984]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
countervailing duty order would be
likely to lead to the continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable July 25, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Background
On April 11, 2013, Commerce
published its countervailing duty order
on drawn stainless steel sinks from
China.1 On March 5, 2018, Commerce
published the notice of initiation of the
first sunset review of the countervailing
duty order on drawn stainless steel
sinks from China pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act.2 On March 16, 2018,
Commerce received a notice of intent to
participate from Elkay Manufacturing
Company (Elkay), a domestic interested
party, within the deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Elkay claimed
1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order, 78 FR 21596 (April 11,2013) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83
FR 9279 (March 5, 2018).
3 See Letter from Elkay ‘‘First Five-Year (‘Sunset’)
Review of Countervailing Duty Order on Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China/Elkay Manufacturing Company’s Notice of
Intent to Participate,’’ dated March 16, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of
stainless steel sinks in the United States.
On April 2, 2018, Commerce received
an adequate substantive response to the
notice of initiation from Elkay within
the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no
substantive responses from respondent
interested parties with respect to the
order covered by this sunset review.
On April 10, 2018, Commerce notified
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) that it did not receive
an adequate substantive response from
respondent interested parties.5 As a
result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
Commerce conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the
countervailing duty order on drawn
stainless steel sinks from China.
strainer sets, rinsing baskets, bottom
grids, or other accessories.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are stainless steel sinks with fabricated
bowls. Fabricated bowls do not have
seamless corners, but rather are made by
notching and bending the stainless steel,
and then welding and finishing the
vertical corners to form the bowls.
Stainless steel sinks with fabricated
bowls may sometimes be referred to as
‘‘zero radius’’ or ‘‘near zero radius’’
sinks. The products covered by this
order are currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under statistical
reporting number 7324.10.0000 and
7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Scope of the Order
Analysis of Comments Received
The merchandise covered by the order
includes drawn stainless steel sinks
with single or multiple drawn bowls,
with or without drain boards, whether
finished or unfinished, regardless of
type of finish, gauge, or grade of
stainless steel. Mounting clips,
fasteners, seals, and sound-deadening
pads are also covered by the scope of
this order if they are included within
the sales price of the drawn stainless
steel sinks.6 For purposes of this scope
definition, the term ‘‘drawn’’ refers to a
manufacturing process using metal
forming technology to produce a smooth
basin with seamless, smooth, and
rounded corners. Drawn stainless steel
sinks are available in various shapes
and configurations and may be
described in a number of ways
including flush mount, top mount, or
undermount (to indicate the attachment
relative to the countertop). Stainless
steel sinks with multiple drawn bowls
that are joined through a welding
operation to form one unit are covered
by the scope of the order. Drawn
stainless steel sinks are covered by the
scope of the order whether or not they
are sold in conjunction with non-subject
accessories such as faucets (whether
attached or unattached), strainers,
Letter from Elkay ‘‘First Five-Year (‘Sunset’)
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China/Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation,’’ dated April 2, 2018.
5 See Letter to the ITC re: ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on March 5, 2018,’’ dated April 10, 2018.
6 Mounting clips, fasteners, seals, and sounddeadening pads are not covered by the scope of this
order if they are not included within the sales price
of the drawn stainless steel sinks, regardless of
whether they are shipped with or entered with
drawn stainless steel sinks.
PO 00000
4 See
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,7 which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy and the net
countervailable subsidy likely to prevail
if the order were revoked. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines
that revocation of the countervailing
duty order on drawn stainless steel
sinks from China would be likely to lead
to the continuation or recurrence of a
7 See Memorandum ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35210-35212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15927]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the
Supplemental List of Arbitrators
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before September 24,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the internet
at [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to David Ritchie, International Trade Administration, 202-
482-4936 or [email protected]. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.trade.gov/td/services/odsi/swiss-us-privacyshield-framework.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Swiss Administration (Swiss) to
provide companies in both Switzerland and the United States with a
mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring
personal data from Switzerland to the United States in support of
transatlantic commerce. On January 12, 2017, the Swiss deemed the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework (Swiss Privacy Shield) adequate to
enable data transfers under Swiss law, and on April 12, 2017, the DOC
began accepting self-certifications from U.S. companies to join the
program (82 FR 16375; April 12, 2017). For more information on the
Privacy Shield, visit www.privacyshield.gov.
As described in Annex I of the Swiss Privacy Shield, the DOC and
the Swiss committed to implement an arbitration mechanism to provide
Swiss individuals with the ability to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether an organization has violated
its obligations under the Privacy Shield. Organizations voluntarily
self-certify to the Swiss Privacy Shield and, upon certification, the
commitments the organization has made to comply with the Swiss Privacy
Shield become legally enforceable under U.S. law. Organizations that
self-certify to the Swiss Privacy Shield commit to binding arbitration
of residual claims if the individual chooses to exercise that option.
Under the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield Panel \a\ (consisting of
one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority
to impose individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as
access, correction, deletion, or return of the individual's data in
question) necessary to remedy the violation of the Swiss Privacy Shield
only with respect to the individual. The parties will select the
arbitrators from the list of arbitrators described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ The Privacy Shield Panel would govern arbitration
proceedings brought under either the Swiss-U.S. or EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Frameworks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DOC and the Swiss Administration are developing a list of up to
five arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators developed under
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. To be eligible for inclusion on
the supplemental list, applicants must be admitted to practice law in
the United States and have expertise in both U.S. privacy law and
European or Swiss data protection law. Applicants shall not be subject
to any instructions from, or be affiliated with, any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., Switzerland, EU, or any EU Member State or
any other governmental authority, public authority or enforcement
authority.
The DOC received emergency approval for this information collection
on March 26, 2018 under Control Number 0625-0278. Upon receiving that
approval, the DOC accepted applications submitted by April 30, 2018 for
inclusion on the Supplemental List of Arbitrators. The DOC is currently
evaluating applicants who submitted by April 30, 2018 and is thus not
currently
[[Page 35211]]
seeking additional applications. However, the DOC is now submitting a
request for a 3-year approval through OMB's general PRA clearance
process, because it may seek additional applications in the future as
appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the Supplemental List of
Arbitrators, eligible individuals are evaluated on the basis of
independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence: Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity: Held in the highest regard by peers for integrity,
fairness and good judgment.
Demonstrates high ethical standards and commitment necessary to be
an arbitrator.
Expertise
Required: Admission to practice law in the United States.
Level of demonstrated expertise in U.S. privacy law and European or
Swiss data protection law.
Other expertise that may be considered includes any of the
following:
Relevant educational degrees and professional licenses.
Relevant professional or academic experience or legal practice.
Relevant training or experience in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Evaluation of applications for inclusion on the list of arbitrators
is undertaken by the DOC and the Swiss Administration. Selected
applicants remain on the list for a period of 3 years, absent
exceptional circumstances, change in eligibility, or for cause,
renewable for one additional period of 3 years.
The DOC selected the International Centre for Dispute Resolution-
American Arbitration Association (ICDR-AAA) as administrator for
Privacy Shield arbitrations brought under either the Swiss-U.S. or EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks.\b\ Among other things, the ICDR-AAA
facilitates arbitrator fee arrangements, including the collection and
timely payment of arbitrator fees and other expenses. Arbitrators are
expected to commit their time and effort when included on the
supplemental Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators and to take
reasonable steps to minimize the costs or fees of the arbitration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\b\ For more information about the selection process and the
role of the administrator, see https://www.privacyshield.gov/Arbitration-Fact-Sheet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arbitrators are subject to a code of conduct consistent with Annex
I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and generally accepted
ethical standards for arbitrators. The DOC and the Swiss Administration
agreed to adopt the arbitral procedures adopted under the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework to govern the arbitral proceedings, subject to
considerations identified in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, including that materials submitted to arbitrators will be
treated confidentially and will only be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information, please visit https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=G-Arbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.)
Applications
Applications must be typewritten and should be headed ``Application
for Inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Supplemental List of
Arbitrators.'' Applications should include the following information,
and each section of the application should be numbered as indicated:
--Name of applicant.
--Address, telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
--Description of the applicant's affiliations with any organization
that has self-certified under either the Swiss-U.S. or EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Frameworks, or the U.S., Switzerland, any EU Member State or any
other governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement
authority.
2. Integrity
--On a separate page, the names, addresses, telephone, and fax numbers
of three individuals willing to provide information concerning the
applicant's qualifications for service, including the applicant's
character, reputation, reliability, and judgment.
--Description of the applicant's willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
--Demonstration of admittance to practice law in the United States.
--Relevant academic degrees and professional training and licensing.
--Current employment, including title, description of responsibility,
name and address of employer, and name and telephone number of
supervisor or other reference.
--Employment history, including the dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of responsibilities.
--Description of expertise in U.S. privacy law and European or Swiss
data protection law.
--Description of training or experience in arbitration or other forms
of dispute resolution, if applicable.
--A list of publications, testimony, and speeches, if any, concerning
U.S. privacy law and European or Swiss data protection law, with copies
appended.
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the DOC is not currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future as appropriate. OMB reviewed
and approved this information collection on an emergency basis as of
March 26, 2018 under Control Number 0625-0278. As the emergency
approval is only valid for 180 days, the DOC is now submitting a
request for a 3-year approval through OMB's full PRA clearance process.
Future applications would be submitted to the U.S. Department of
Commerce, either by email or by fax. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.trade.gov/td/services/odsi/swiss-us-privacyshield-framework.pdf.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625-0278.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Private Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
Estimated Time per Response: 240 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 80.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or
[[Page 35212]]
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-15927 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P