Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires From Sri Lanka: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Notice of Amended Final Determination and Revocation of Countervailing Duty Order, 35213-35214 [2018-15879]
Download as PDF
35213
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
pertaining to the countervailing duty
(CVD) investigation of certain new
Net subsidy
pneumatic off-the-road tires (off road
Producer/exporter
rate %
tires) from Sri Lanka. Commerce is
notifying the public that the final
Guangdong Yingao Kitche
judgment in this case is not in harmony
Utensils Co., Ltd. and
with Commerce’s final determination in
Forshan Magang Kitchen
Utensils Co., Ltd ...............
4.90 the CVD investigation of off road tires
from Sri Lanka. Pursuant to the CIT’s
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd ....................
12.31 final judgment, the mandatory
Foshan Zhaoshun Trade
respondent in the CVD investigation of
Co., Ltd .............................
12.36 off road tires from Sri Lanka received a
All Others ..............................
8.61 net countervailable subsidy rate of 1.23
percent, a rate that is de minimis and,
Notification to Interested Parties
therefore, Commerce is hereby revoking
this order.
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
DATES: Applicable July 21, 2018.
administrative protective order (APO) of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
their responsibility concerning the
Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD Operations,
return or destruction of proprietary
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
information disclosed under APO in
International Trade Administration,
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Timely notification of the return or
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
destruction of APO materials or
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6274.
conversion to judicial protective orders
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
Background
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
On January 10, 2017, Commerce
sanction.
published the Final Determination in
We are issuing and publishing the
this proceeding.1 Commerce reached an
final results and this notice in
affirmative determination that
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), countervailable subsidies were provided
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
to mandatory respondent Camso
351.218.
Loadstar (Private), Ltd. (Camso
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Loadstar). Commerce published the
countervailing duty order resulting from
Gary Taverman,
the investigation on March 6, 2017.2
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Camso Loadstar and the Government
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
of Sri Lanka (GOSL) appealed the Final
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Determination and countervailing duty
Enforcement and Compliance.
order to the CIT, and on April 17, 2018,
[FR Doc. 2018–15883 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am]
the CIT remanded the Final
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Determination.3 Specifically, the CIT
remanded the Final Determination
directing Commerce to eliminate any
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
duties attributable to the Guaranteed
Price Scheme for Rubber (GPS) program
International Trade Administration
based on mere reimbursement for
[C–542–801]
excessive rubber payments.4 On June
13, 2016, Commerce issued its final
Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road
results of redetermination pursuant to
Tires From Sri Lanka: Notice of Court
remand in accordance with the CIT’s
Decision Not in Harmony With Final
order.5 On remand, Commerce, under
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, Notice of Amended
1 See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
Final Determination and Revocation of from Sri Lanka: Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination, and Final Determination of
Countervailing Duty Order
countervailable subsidy at the rates
listed below: 8
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 11, 2018, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
entered its final judgment sustaining the
final results of remand redetermination
pursuant to court order by the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
8 See
Order, 70 FR 21596, 21597.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 2949, 2950 (January
10, 2017) (Final Determination) and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
2 See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
from India and Sri Lanka: Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination for
India and Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 12556
(Mar. 6, 2017) (Order).
3 See Government of Sri Lanka v. United States,
Slip Op. 18–43 (CIT Apr. 17, 2018).
4 Id. at 20.
5 See Final Results of Redetermination on
Remand Pursuant to Government of Sri Lanka v.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respectful protest,6 eliminated any
duties attributable to the GPS program
and recalculated the countervailable
subsidy rate for Camso Loadstar
accordingly. On July 11, 2018, the CIT
sustained Commerce’s Final
Redetermination.7 Thus, the effective
date of this notice is July 21, 2018.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,8 as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades,9 the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal
Circuit) held that, pursuant to section
516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce must
publish a notice of court decision that
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.10 The
CIT’s July 11, 2018, final judgment
sustaining the Final Redetermination
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Final Determination. Thus, this notice is
published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken and
section 516A of the Act.
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court
decision, Commerce is amending the
Final Determination with respect to
Camso Loadstar. The revised
countervailable subsidy rate for Camso
Loadstar for the period January 1, 2015,
through December 31, 2015, is as
follows:
Exporter or producer
Subsidy rate
(percent)
Camso Loadstar (Private), Ltd
1.23 (de minimis).
Revocation of the Order
Pursuant to section 705(a)(3) of the
Act, Commerce ‘‘shall disregard any
countervailable subsidy that is de
minimis as defined in section 703(b)(4)’’
of the Act. Furthermore, and pursuant to
section 705(c)(2) of the Act, ‘‘the
investigation shall be terminated upon
publication of that negative
United States, Slip Op. 18–43 (CIT April 17, 2018),
dated June 13, 2016 (Final Redetermination). See
also https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/1843.pdf.
6 See Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d
1371 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
7 See Government of Sri Lanka v. United States,
Slip Op. 18–87, Consol. Court No. 17–00059 (CIT
July 11, 2018) (Final Remand Order).
8 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
9 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
10 See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
35214
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2018 / Notices
determination’’ and Commerce shall
‘‘terminate the suspension of
liquidation’’ and ‘‘release any bond or
other security, and refund any cash
deposit.’’ As a result of the CIT’s
decision affirming Commerce’s Final
Redetermination, Commerce is revoking
the countervailing duty order on off
road tires from Sri Lanka 11 because the
revised CVD margin for Camso Loadstar,
the only mandatory respondent, is now
de minimis.12 Because the revised net
countervailable subsidy rate for the sole
mandatory respondent, Camso Loadstar,
is de minimis, Commerce did not
determine an all-others rate in the Final
Redetermination. Accordingly,
Commerce intends to issue instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to release any bonds or other
security and refund cash deposits
pertaining to any suspended entries
pursuant to the Order. As a result of this
revocation, Commerce will not initiate
administrative reviews of this Order.13
Although section 705(c)(2)(A) of the
Act instructs Commerce to terminate
suspension of liquidation, we note that,
pursuant to Timken, the suspension of
liquidation must continue during the
pendency of the appeals process. Thus,
we will continue to instruct CBP at this
time to (A) release any bond or other
security, and refund any cash deposit
made pursuant to the Order as
discussed above; and (B) suspend
liquidation of all unliquidated entries of
subject merchandise from Sri Lanka at
a cash deposit rate of 0.00 percent
which are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
July 21, 2018, which is ten days after the
court’s decision, in accordance with
section 516A of the Act.14 In the event
that the CIT’s judgment affirming the
Final Redetermination is not appealed,
or appealed and upheld by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
Commerce will instruct CBP to
terminate the suspension of liquidation
and to liquidate those entries of subject
merchandise without regard to
countervailing duties. Notwithstanding
the continued suspension described
above, the countervailing duty order on
off road tires from Sri Lanka is hereby
revoked, as described above.
Lastly, we note that, at this time,
Commerce remains enjoined by Court
order from liquidating entries that were
produced and/or exported by Camso
Loadstar, and were entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period June 20,
2016, through October 17, 2016, and
from February 28, 2017, through
December 31, 2017. These entries will
remain enjoined pursuant to the terms
of the injunction during the pendency of
any appeals process.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of the APO is a violation
subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 516A(c)(1) and
(e) of the Act.
Dated: July 19, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–15879 Filed 7–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
11 See
Order, 82 FR at 12556.
section 703(b)(4)(B) of the Act; Developing
and Least-Developed Country Designations under
the Countervailing Duty Law, 63 FR 29945 (June 2,
1998).
13 Commerce did not previously initiate any
administrative review of the Order.
14 See, e.g., Drill Pipe from the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
with International Trade Commission’s Injury
Determination, Revocation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders Pursuant to Court
Decision, and Discontinuation of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 79 FR 78037, 78038
(December 29, 2014); High Pressure Steel Cylinders
From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Determination in Less Than Fair Value
Investigation, Notice of Amended Final
Determination Pursuant to Court Decision, Notice of
Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order in Part, and
Discontinuation of Fifth Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 82 FR 46758, 46760
(October 6, 2017).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
12 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 24, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–813, A–301–803, and A–549–833]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Belgium, Colombia and Thailand:
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC),
Commerce is issuing antidumping duty
(AD) orders on citric acid and certain
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
citrate salts (citric acid) from Belgium,
Colombia and Thailand.
DATES: Applicable July 25, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Stolz (Belgium), Stephanie Moore
(Colombia) or Joy Zhang (Thailand);
AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474,
(202) 482–3692, (202) 482–1168,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 5, 2018, in accordance with
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.210(c), Commerce
published its affirmative final
determinations in the less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigations of citric
acid from Belgium, Colombia and
Thailand.1 On July 10, 2018, the ITC
notified Commerce of its affirmative
final determination, pursuant to section
735(d) of the Act, that an industry in the
United States is materially injured
within the meaning of section
735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by reason of
the LTFV imports of citric acid from
Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand, and
its determination that critical
circumstances do not exist with respect
to imports of citric acid from Thailand
subject to Commerce’s affirmative
critical circumstances determination.2
On July 16, 2018, the ITC published its
final determination in the Federal
Register.3
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium: Affirmative Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 26001 (June 5, 2018)
(Belgium Final Determination); see also Citric Acid
and Certain Citrate Salts from Colombia:
Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination
of Critical Circumstances, 83 FR 26002 (June 5,
2018) (Colombia Final Determination); and Citric
Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Thailand:
Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances in Part, 83
FR 25998 (June 5, 2018) (Thailand Final
Determination).
2 See Letter from the ITC to the Honorable Gary
Taverman, dated July 10, 2018 (Notification of ITC
Final Determination); see also Citric Acid from
Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand, Investigation
Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Final) (July 2018). On
October 20, 2017, the petitioners submitted a timely
filed critical circumstances allegation with respect
to imports from Colombia and Thailand. Commerce
subsequently issued a negative critical
circumstances determination with regard to the
investigation for Colombia and, thus, the ITC did
not address critical circumstances for Colombia in
its final injury determination.
3 See Citric Acid from Belgium, Colombia, and
Thailand; Determinations, 83 FR 32905 (July 16,
2018).
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35213-35214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-542-801]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires From Sri Lanka: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination, Notice of Amended Final Determination and
Revocation of Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 11, 2018, the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) entered its final judgment sustaining the final results of
remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the countervailing duty (CVD)
investigation of certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (off road
tires) from Sri Lanka. Commerce is notifying the public that the final
judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final
determination in the CVD investigation of off road tires from Sri
Lanka. Pursuant to the CIT's final judgment, the mandatory respondent
in the CVD investigation of off road tires from Sri Lanka received a
net countervailable subsidy rate of 1.23 percent, a rate that is de
minimis and, therefore, Commerce is hereby revoking this order.
DATES: Applicable July 21, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 10, 2017, Commerce published the Final Determination in
this proceeding.\1\ Commerce reached an affirmative determination that
countervailable subsidies were provided to mandatory respondent Camso
Loadstar (Private), Ltd. (Camso Loadstar). Commerce published the
countervailing duty order resulting from the investigation on March 6,
2017.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from Sri Lanka:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Final
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 2949, 2950 (January
10, 2017) (Final Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India and
Sri Lanka: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination for India and Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 12556
(Mar. 6, 2017) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Camso Loadstar and the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) appealed the
Final Determination and countervailing duty order to the CIT, and on
April 17, 2018, the CIT remanded the Final Determination.\3\
Specifically, the CIT remanded the Final Determination directing
Commerce to eliminate any duties attributable to the Guaranteed Price
Scheme for Rubber (GPS) program based on mere reimbursement for
excessive rubber payments.\4\ On June 13, 2016, Commerce issued its
final results of redetermination pursuant to remand in accordance with
the CIT's order.\5\ On remand, Commerce, under respectful protest,\6\
eliminated any duties attributable to the GPS program and recalculated
the countervailable subsidy rate for Camso Loadstar accordingly. On
July 11, 2018, the CIT sustained Commerce's Final Redetermination.\7\
Thus, the effective date of this notice is July 21, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Government of Sri Lanka v. United States, Slip Op. 18-43
(CIT Apr. 17, 2018).
\4\ Id. at 20.
\5\ See Final Results of Redetermination on Remand Pursuant to
Government of Sri Lanka v. United States, Slip Op. 18-43 (CIT April
17, 2018), dated June 13, 2016 (Final Redetermination). See also
https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/18-43.pdf.
\6\ See Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d 1371 (Fed.
Cir. 2003).
\7\ See Government of Sri Lanka v. United States, Slip Op. 18-
87, Consol. Court No. 17-00059 (CIT July 11, 2018) (Final Remand
Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\8\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\9\
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) held
that, pursuant to section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not
``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision.\10\ The
CIT's July 11, 2018, final judgment sustaining the Final
Redetermination constitutes a final decision of that court that is not
in harmony with Commerce's Final Determination. Thus, this notice is
published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken and
section 516A of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\9\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
\10\ See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending
the Final Determination with respect to Camso Loadstar. The revised
countervailable subsidy rate for Camso Loadstar for the period January
1, 2015, through December 31, 2015, is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter or producer Subsidy rate (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Camso Loadstar (Private), Ltd 1.23 (de minimis).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revocation of the Order
Pursuant to section 705(a)(3) of the Act, Commerce ``shall
disregard any countervailable subsidy that is de minimis as defined in
section 703(b)(4)'' of the Act. Furthermore, and pursuant to section
705(c)(2) of the Act, ``the investigation shall be terminated upon
publication of that negative
[[Page 35214]]
determination'' and Commerce shall ``terminate the suspension of
liquidation'' and ``release any bond or other security, and refund any
cash deposit.'' As a result of the CIT's decision affirming Commerce's
Final Redetermination, Commerce is revoking the countervailing duty
order on off road tires from Sri Lanka \11\ because the revised CVD
margin for Camso Loadstar, the only mandatory respondent, is now de
minimis.\12\ Because the revised net countervailable subsidy rate for
the sole mandatory respondent, Camso Loadstar, is de minimis, Commerce
did not determine an all-others rate in the Final Redetermination.
Accordingly, Commerce intends to issue instructions to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to release any bonds or other security and
refund cash deposits pertaining to any suspended entries pursuant to
the Order. As a result of this revocation, Commerce will not initiate
administrative reviews of this Order.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Order, 82 FR at 12556.
\12\ See section 703(b)(4)(B) of the Act; Developing and Least-
Developed Country Designations under the Countervailing Duty Law, 63
FR 29945 (June 2, 1998).
\13\ Commerce did not previously initiate any administrative
review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although section 705(c)(2)(A) of the Act instructs Commerce to
terminate suspension of liquidation, we note that, pursuant to Timken,
the suspension of liquidation must continue during the pendency of the
appeals process. Thus, we will continue to instruct CBP at this time to
(A) release any bond or other security, and refund any cash deposit
made pursuant to the Order as discussed above; and (B) suspend
liquidation of all unliquidated entries of subject merchandise from Sri
Lanka at a cash deposit rate of 0.00 percent which are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July 21, 2018,
which is ten days after the court's decision, in accordance with
section 516A of the Act.\14\ In the event that the CIT's judgment
affirming the Final Redetermination is not appealed, or appealed and
upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Commerce
will instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to
liquidate those entries of subject merchandise without regard to
countervailing duties. Notwithstanding the continued suspension
described above, the countervailing duty order on off road tires from
Sri Lanka is hereby revoked, as described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See, e.g., Drill Pipe from the People's Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with International Trade
Commission's Injury Determination, Revocation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders Pursuant to Court Decision, and
Discontinuation of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 79 FR
78037, 78038 (December 29, 2014); High Pressure Steel Cylinders From
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With Final Determination in Less Than Fair Value
Investigation, Notice of Amended Final Determination Pursuant to
Court Decision, Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order in
Part, and Discontinuation of Fifth Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 82 FR 46758, 46760 (October 6, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, we note that, at this time, Commerce remains enjoined by
Court order from liquidating entries that were produced and/or exported
by Camso Loadstar, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period June 20, 2016, through October 17, 2016,
and from February 28, 2017, through December 31, 2017. These entries
will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the
pendency of any appeals process.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of the APO is a violation subject to
sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
516A(c)(1) and (e) of the Act.
Dated: July 19, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-15879 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P