Institution of Investigation: Certain Powered Cover Plates, 34871-34872 [2018-15695]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
using the alpha values and/or at least one
value derived from the alpha values’’ in
claim 1 of the ’104 patent, under what legal
theory (if any) may the Commission base its
construction upon Broadcom’s arguments in
the district court case Broadcom Corp. v.
SiRF Technology, Inc., Case No. 8:08–cv–
00546–JVS–MLG (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2010)?
4. If your responses to the questions above
contend that one or more of the final ID’s
claim constructions should be changed,
please explain how each change in claim
construction would impact the issues of
infringement, invalidity, and the technical
prong of the domestic industry requirement.
The parties have been invited to brief
only the discrete issues described above,
with reference to the applicable law and
evidentiary record. The parties are not
to brief other issues on review, which
are adequately presented in the parties’
existing filings.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue a cease
and desist order that could result in the
respondent being required to cease and
desist from engaging in unfair acts in
the importation and sale of such
articles. Accordingly, the Commission is
interested in receiving written
submissions that address the form of
remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
If a party seeks exclusion of an article
from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see Certain Devices for
Connecting Computers via Telephone
Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2)
competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles
that are like or directly competitive with
those that are subject to investigation,
and (4) U.S. consumers. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving written submissions that
address the aforementioned public
interest factors in the context of this
investigation. The Commission is
particularly interested in briefing on the
following issue:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Jul 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
1. If the Commission were to issue
remedial orders in this investigation, could
the demand for the excluded articles be
fulfilled by others?
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve or
disapprove the Commission’s action.
See Presidential Memorandum of July
21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury. The Commission is therefore
interested in receiving submissions
concerning the amount of the bond that
should be imposed if a remedy is
ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issues
identified in this notice. Parties to the
investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the
recommended determination by the ALJ
on remedy and bonding, which issued
on May 23, 2018. Broadcom is also
requested to submit proposed remedial
orders for the Commission’s
consideration. Broadcom is additionally
requested to state the date that the ’059,
’844 and ’104 patents expire, the HTSUS
numbers under which the subject
articles are imported, and to supply a
list of known importers of the subject
articles. The written submissions,
exclusive of any exhibits, must not
exceed 60 pages, and must be filed no
later than close of business on July 27,
2018. Reply submissions must not
exceed 30 pages, and must be filed no
later than the close of business on
August 3, 2018. No further submissions
on these issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–1047’’) in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf.)
Persons with questions regarding filing
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34871
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All information,
including confidential business
information and documents for which
confidential treatment is properly
sought, submitted to the Commission for
purposes of this Investigation may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary
and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 17, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–15635 Filed 7–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1124]
Institution of Investigation: Certain
Powered Cover Plates
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
20, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff
SUMMARY:
1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate
nondisclosure agreements.
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
34872
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 141 / Monday, July 23, 2018 / Notices
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
SnapRays, LLC d/b/a SnapPower of
Vineyard, Utah. Supplements to the
Complaint were filed on July 6, July 11,
and July 12, 2018. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain powered cover plates by reason
of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
9,871,324 (‘‘the ’324 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 9,917,430 (‘‘the ’430 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 9,882,361 (‘‘the ’361
patent’’) and U.S. Design Patent No.
D819,426 (‘‘the ’426 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order, or in the
alternative a limited exclusion order,
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:07 Jul 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
International Trade Commission, on
July 17, 2018, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of products identified in
paragraph (2) by reason of infringement
of one or more of claims 1, 4, 8, 9, 10,
13, 16, 17, and 19 of the ’324 patent;
claims 1–3, 7, 8, 18, and 19 of the ’430
patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 10, 14, 17, 21, 23,
and 24 of the ’361 patent; and the sole
claim of the ’426 patent; and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘powered cover plates,
which are electrical receptacle covers
with built-in functionality’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: SnapRays,
LLC d/b/a SnapPower, 426 East 1750
North, Unit D, Vineyard, UT 84057.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Ontel Products Corporation, 21 Law Dr.,
Fairfield, NJ 07871
Dazone LLC, 1141 East Acacia Ct.,
Ontario, CA 91761–4519
Shenzhen C-Myway, Saige Science Park
#4, Futian, Shenzhen, Guangdong,
China
E-Zshop4u LLC, 9335 San Jose Blvd.,
Howey in the Hills, FL 34737
Desteny Store, 10840 Tiberio Dr., Fort
Meyers, FL 33913
Zhongshan Led-Up Light Co. Ltd.,
6016A, Bldg. B5, No. 133, Yunhan
Rd., Qijiang Rd., Shaxi Town,
Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
AllTrade Tools LLC, 6122 KateIla Ave.,
Cypress, CA 90630
Guangzhou Sailu Info Tech. Co., Ltd.,
Nan Hang Huo Yun Da Lou Yuan Nei
Can, 3 Hao YunXiao Lu, Bai Yun Qu
510400, Guangzhou Gunagdong China
NEPCI—Zhejiang New-Epoch,
Communication Industry Co., Ltd.,
Develop Road, Wengyang Industry
Zone, Yueging, Zhejiang, China
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
KCC Industries, 4950 Goodman Way,
Eastvale, CA 91752–5087
Vistek Technology Co., Ltd., Rm 605,
No. 278 Yongzheng Bldg., Defeng Rd.,
Fuyong, Baoan, Shenzhen, China
518103
Enstant Technology Co., Ltd., A525
Boaoan Smart Valley, YinTian Rd,
Xixiang Baoan District, Shenzhen,
China 518105
Manufacturers Components
Incorporated, 1721 Blount Road, #2,
Pompano Beach, FL 33069
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 18, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–15695 Filed 7–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34871-34872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15695]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1124]
Institution of Investigation: Certain Powered Cover Plates
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 20, 2018, under section 337
of the Tariff
[[Page 34872]]
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of SnapRays, LLC d/b/a SnapPower of
Vineyard, Utah. Supplements to the Complaint were filed on July 6, July
11, and July 12, 2018. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain powered cover plates by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,871,324 (``the '324 patent''); U.S.
Patent No. 9,917,430 (``the '430 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,882,361
(``the '361 patent'') and U.S. Design Patent No. D819,426 (``the '426
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion
order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on July 17, 2018, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of products identified
in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1,
4, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, and 19 of the '324 patent; claims 1-3, 7, 8,
18, and 19 of the '430 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 10, 14, 17, 21, 23, and
24 of the '361 patent; and the sole claim of the '426 patent; and
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``powered cover
plates, which are electrical receptacle covers with built-in
functionality'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: SnapRays, LLC d/b/a SnapPower, 426 East
1750 North, Unit D, Vineyard, UT 84057.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Ontel Products Corporation, 21 Law Dr., Fairfield, NJ 07871
Dazone LLC, 1141 East Acacia Ct., Ontario, CA 91761-4519
Shenzhen C-Myway, Saige Science Park #4, Futian, Shenzhen, Guangdong,
China
E-Zshop4u LLC, 9335 San Jose Blvd., Howey in the Hills, FL 34737
Desteny Store, 10840 Tiberio Dr., Fort Meyers, FL 33913
Zhongshan Led-Up Light Co. Ltd., 6016A, Bldg. B5, No. 133, Yunhan Rd.,
Qijiang Rd., Shaxi Town, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
AllTrade Tools LLC, 6122 KateIla Ave., Cypress, CA 90630
Guangzhou Sailu Info Tech. Co., Ltd., Nan Hang Huo Yun Da Lou Yuan Nei
Can, 3 Hao YunXiao Lu, Bai Yun Qu 510400, Guangzhou Gunagdong China
NEPCI--Zhejiang New-Epoch, Communication Industry Co., Ltd., Develop
Road, Wengyang Industry Zone, Yueging, Zhejiang, China
KCC Industries, 4950 Goodman Way, Eastvale, CA 91752-5087
Vistek Technology Co., Ltd., Rm 605, No. 278 Yongzheng Bldg., Defeng
Rd., Fuyong, Baoan, Shenzhen, China 518103
Enstant Technology Co., Ltd., A525 Boaoan Smart Valley, YinTian Rd,
Xixiang Baoan District, Shenzhen, China 518105
Manufacturers Components Incorporated, 1721 Blount Road, #2, Pompano
Beach, FL 33069
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 18, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-15695 Filed 7-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P