Self-Regulatory Organizations: Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change by Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC to List and Trade on the Exchange Options on the SPIKESTM, 32932-32944 [2018-15178]
Download as PDF
32932
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–36 on the subject
line.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–36. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–36 and
should be submitted on or before
August 6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
[Release No. 34–83619; File No. SR–MIAX–
2018–14]
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public
Law 94–409, that the Securities and
Exchange Commission will hold an
Open Meeting on July 18, 2018 at 10:00
a.m.
Self-Regulatory Organizations: Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change by
Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC to List and Trade on
the Exchange Options on the
SPIKESTM Index
The meeting will be held in the
Auditorium, Room LL–002 at the
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on June 28, 2018, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I and II below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
TIME AND DATE:
PLACE:
This meeting will begin at 10:00
a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.
Seating will be on a first-come, firstserved basis. Visitors will be subject to
security checks. The meeting will be
webcast on the Commission’s website at
https://www.sec.gov.
STATUS:
The subject
matters of the Open Meeting will be the
Commission’s consideration of:
1. Whether to adopt an amendment to
Securities Act Rule 701(e), as mandated
by the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.
2. Whether to issue a concept release
requesting comment on potential
revisions to Securities Act Rule 701 and
Securities Act Form S–8.
3. Whether to propose amendments to
the disclosure requirements in Rule 3–
10 and Rule 3–16 of Regulation S–X.
4. Whether to adopt amendments to
Rule 3a1–1 and Regulation ATS and
new Form ATS–N under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 related to certain
alternative trading systems.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information, please contact
Brent J. Fields from the Office of the
Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
Dated: July 11, 2018.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–15233 Filed 7–12–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[FR Doc. 2018–15083 Filed 7–13–18; 8:45 am]
July 11, 2018.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade on the Exchange options on the
SPIKESTM Index (‘‘SPIKES’’ or the
‘‘Index’’), a new index that measures
expected 30-day volatility of the SPDR
S&P 500 ETF Trust. The Exchange also
proposes to list and trade short-term,
quarterly, and long-term options on
SPIKES. Options on SPIKES will be
cash-settled and will have Europeanstyle exercise provisions.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/, at MIAX Options’ principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
2 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
The Index is calculated using only
standard options on SPY that expire on
the third Friday of each calendar month.
Although weekly options on SPY are
available, these are not used in the
calculation of the Index.
The calculation linearly interpolates
between the variances of two monthly
expirations—near-term (the closest
expiration more than two full days into
the future) and next-term (the monthly
expiration following the near-term).
This expiration selection method is
used to avoid using highly irregular
option prices close to the options
settlement date. The 30-day point is
typically in between these two
expirations and the Index is
interpolated between the volatilities of
these two terms. When the closest
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81739
(September 27, 2017), 82 FR 46111 (October 3,
2017) (SR–MIAX–2017–39) (Order approving the
adoption of rules relating to trading in index
options).
4 Since the SPIKES Index is calculated on a realtime basis, the Exchange uses 1-second precision to
measure time in years (which is expressed to at
least eight decimal places, by dividing the number
of seconds to option expiration by the total number
of seconds in a year).
5 This price is also known as the Reference Price,
as defined and discussed in more detail below, in
the following subsection 1, Determine Option
Prices.
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently adopted
generic rules relating to the listing and
trading of cash-settled index options on
the Exchange.3 The Exchange now
proposes to amend its rules to provide
for the listing and trading on the
Exchange of options on the Index. The
Index measures expected 30-day
volatility of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Trust (commonly known and referred to
by its ticker symbol, ‘‘SPY’’). Options on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
the Index will be cash-settled and will
have European-style exercise
provisions. In addition to regular
options, the Exchange proposes to also
list short-term, quarterly, and long-term
options on the Index. The Index is
calculated using published real-time
prices and bid/ask quotes of SPY
options. The Index represents
annualized expected volatility and is
quoted in percentage points.
Index Design and Composition
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
EN16JY18.014
The calculation of the Index is based
on the methodology developed by T3i
Pty Ltd, a firm that develops proprietary
indexes, including derivatives-based
indexes and options-enhanced indexes.
The Index will be calculated and
maintained by the Exchange. The Index
measures expected 30-day volatility of
SPY, historically the largest and most
actively traded ETF in the United States
as measured by its assets under
management and the value of shares
traded.
Like most indices, the Index has a
defined rules-based approach to
selecting components—a series of
options on the SPY—and weighting
them to derive a single price for the
Index.
Therefore, the formula for expected Tterm variance is as follows:
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
32933
32934
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
expiration is too close to expiry (less
than two full days), rolling to the thirdclosest expiration occurs. This rolling
rule serves to reduce spurious
variability in the Index by means of
minimizing the period of
‘‘extrapolation’’ between the two
expirations. The switch from closest to
third-closest expiry rarely has any
noticeable impact on the actual Index
value, as the weight of the switched
term is close to zero. The following
describes the methodology used to price
the Index in greater detail.
1. Determine Option Prices
SPIKES uses a proprietary ‘‘price
dragging’’ technique to determine the
ongoing price for each individual option
used in the calculation of the Index
(‘‘Reference Price’’), to calculate the
Index, as follows:
• Initially set all prices to 0;
• If there is a trade, the price of the
option is always set to the trade price;
• If there is not yet a trade, on the
opening quote, the opening bid is used
as the current price;
• For newly-placed ask (bid) quotes,
if the ask (bid) is lower (higher) than
current Reference Price, the option price
is set to ask (bid).
SPIKES
input 6
Time
Market
9:30:00 ................................
9:31:10 ................................
9:31:10 ................................
0 x 0 ....................................
2.35 x 2.65 ..........................
Trade @ 2.38 .....................
0.00
2.35
2.38
9:33:01 ................................
2.31 x 2.65 ..........................
9:33:48 ................................
Change in
SPIKES
input
The Exchange believes that this
method should materially reduce erratic
movements of the Index value as
quotations on out-of-the-money
(‘‘OTM’’) options are rapidly altered
during times of low liquidity. The
Exchange believes that this method is a
material enhancement over existing
calculation methodologies, and should
result in improved Index stability by
smoothing out options price inputs into
the Index calculation, especially as
options quotes are rapidly changing.
An example of the price dragging
technique is given below:
Midpoint
input
Change in
midpoint
input
Difference
b/t SPIKES
input and
midpoint
input
........................
........................
........................
0.00
0.15
0.12
2.48
2.31 x 2.39 ..........................
2.38
........................
2.35
Trade @ 2.37 .....................
2.37
2.35
9:38:34 ................................
2.32 x 2.40 ..........................
2.37
........................
.01
........................
........................
.02
........................
.13
........................
0.10
9:36:41 ................................
9:38:52 ................................
2.00 x 6.00 ..........................
2.37
........................
4.00
9:39:02 ................................
Trade @ 3.10 .....................
3.10
3.05 x 3.50 ..........................
3.10
........................
.73
........................
4.00
9:39:20 ................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
0.00
2.50
2.50
2.38
........................
........................
........................
.03
........................
The example shows a hypothetical
market for a specific option used as an
input to SPIKES. The results of price
dragging are shown in the column
‘‘SPIKES Input,’’ and a hypothetical
result using an alternative method of
calculating the option input price using
the midpoint method is shown in the
column ‘‘Midpoint Input.’’ The
difference between the result using the
SPIKES Input and the Midpoint Input is
shown in the ‘‘Difference b/t SPIKES
Input and Midpoint Input Column.’’
The shaded cells illustrate changes in
the input prices of the two methods
after each update to the market. The
Exchange believes that the example
illustrates that, given the hypothetical
market prices, the price dragging
technique results in a smoother Index
price because it relies primarily on trade
prices (which are more indicative of
actual value), only using quote prices
when a quote bid is higher than the last
6 This value is also referred to as the Reference
Price, as defined above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
trade or a quote offer is lower than the
last trade. Additionally, the Index
performance has been evaluated using
alternative calculation methodologies.
This evaluation included a comparison
of the performance of the Index when
calculated using the price dragging
technique, versus the performance of
the Index when calculated using an
alternative midpoint method, and
covered periods of both low and high
volatility in SPY. The Exchange believes
that the price dragging technique
consistently outperformed the midpoint
method, as measured by the Index’s
overall stability and smoothness of price
changes, resulting from primarily
relying on trade prices (which are more
indicative of actual value).
The price dragging technique is used
to determine the Reference Price for
each individual option used in the
Index calculation. The Exchange
believes that this technique is a material
enhancement that may improve Index
stability by smoothing out options price
inputs into the Index calculation,
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2.36
3.275
........................
.01
........................
1.64
........................
........................
0.725
0.03
0.02
0.01
1.63
0.90
0.175
especially as options quotes are rapidly
changing. The price dragging technique
is used for intraday calculation of the
Index. The Exchange believes that the
price dragging technique may be a more
accurate and effective way to determine
the Index value because the primary
factor considered when updating the
Reference Price is whether or not a trade
has occurred. If a trade occurred, the
Reference Price is set to the trade price.
This methodology represents a
Reference Price which is based on a
‘‘meeting of the minds,’’ or the creation
of a contract. The Exchange believes
that this more accurately represents the
fair value at that given time, and thus
will benefit investors and market
participants trading options on the
Index.
A competing volatility index uses an
alternative method for calculating its
reference price. Specifically, that
competing volatility index utilizes the
mid-point of the bid and ask and only
updates the reference price when there
is a change in the bid or ask. The
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
32935
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
Exchange believes that this
methodology could be less reliable
because it creates the potential for
skewed reference prices in the event of
a wide market. Options are often quoted
in bulk by market makers, which in
some cases, causes a divergence from
the orthodox supply-demand dynamics
as quotes are constantly updated across
a series of strikes throughout the day. As
a result, there can be more notable
movements within the bid/ask spread
that impact the calculation of an index
based on mid-point prices.
Therefore, the Exchange believes that
the price dragging technique may create
a more accurate and stable Index value
and may better represent volatility in
the market by emphasizing the actual
trade price versus simply the midpoint
spread. Furthermore, the Exchange
believes that the enhanced feature may
provide greater consistency in the
marketplace because the price dragging
technique results in a Reference Price
that is supported by the fair market
value at the time versus using the midpoint, which is not necessarily an
accurate representation of the fair
market value at the time.
2. Select the Options
Another key feature of SPIKES is its
exclusion rule (truncation method). The
exclusion rule determines how far away
from the money to exclude strikes from
the volatility calculation. For each of the
expirations, the securities to be used in
the calculation are selected by removing
in-the-money and OTM options, as
follows:
• To determine the ATM strike, find
the intersection of the put and call
linearly interpolated price curves. Select
the strike closest to the value of the
intersection of the curves—this becomes
the ATM strike. If the intersection falls
exactly in the middle of two strikes, or
if the whole segments overlap (i.e.,
SPIKES
input
included?
SPIKES
input 7
Strike
201 .......................................................................................
200.5 ....................................................................................
200 .......................................................................................
199.5 ....................................................................................
199 .......................................................................................
198.5 ....................................................................................
198 .......................................................................................
197.5 ....................................................................................
197 .......................................................................................
196.5 ....................................................................................
196 .......................................................................................
195.5 ....................................................................................
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
Include ...........
Include ...........
Include ...........
Include ...........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
Exclude ..........
when four neighboring calls and puts
have the same price), use the lower
strike. In case of more than one
intersection point (in rare cases of
highly irregular market prices), use the
one closest to the current value of SPY.
• Use all listed puts below the ATM
strike and all listed calls above the ATM
strike, and both the ATM call and put.
When two consecutive option prices of
$0.05 or less are encountered when
moving away from the ATM, exclude all
the strikes beyond that level, from each
of the put and call side.
A competing volatility index that uses
the midpoint for its option input prices
uses a different exclusion rule, which
similarly moves away from the ATM,
but excludes individual strikes if they
have no bid, and excludes all the strikes
beyond two consecutive no bid strikes.
A comparison of a hypothetical list of
put option inputs and the resulting
inclusion decision is given below.
Market
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0
0.01
0
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.11
0.1
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.05
VIX input
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.055
0.055
0.05
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.025
VIX input
included?
Include.
Include.
Include.
Include.
Exclude.
Include.
Include.
Include.
Include.
Exclude.
Include.
Exclude.
better reflects the expected measure of
volatility.
As discussed previously, the price
dragging method reduces the variability
of the option inputs. Since the option
inputs have reduced variability, and
those values are used to determine
which strikes make it into the index
calculation, the combination of price
dragging and exclusion rules work
together to, in the Exchange’s opinion,
create a more reliable Index value.
Each eligible option’s contribution is
proportional to the change in the strike
(half the difference between the strike
on either side of the option) and the
price, and inversely proportional to the
square of the option’s strike. After
calculating for each option, these are
summed and multiplied by two times
the exponential of the risk free rate
times time-to-expiration. The next step
is to subtract from this value, the square
of, the difference between the ATM call
and put prices, times the exponential of
the risk free rate times time-to-
expiration, divided by the ATM strike.
Lastly, divide the result by the time to
expiration to arrive at the final value.
7 See
3. Weight the Options and Estimate
Volatility
For each term, the volatility is
estimated using the variance swap
approximation, with the selected
options’ prices weighted according to
the SPIKES formula:
4. Calculate the Index
Compute the 30-day weighted average
of the near- and next-term variances,
supra note 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
EN16JY18.015
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The purpose of the exclusion rule is
to remove option inputs from the
calculation that could be deemed less
reliable and thus potentially negatively
impact the calculation outcome. The
Exchange believes that its exclusion
methodology is a material enhancement
over existing methodologies, and should
result in a calculation outcome that
32936
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
take the square root, and multiply by
100, as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Background Information
SPY is the largest and most actively
traded ETF in the U.S.8 According to
State Street Global Advisor, the Trustee
of SPY, as of May 14, 2018, the net
assets under management in SPY was
approximately $263 billion; the
weighted average market capitalization
of the portfolio components was
approximately $217 billion; the smallest
market capitalization was
approximately $3.6 billion (Range
Resources Corporation, ticker: RRC),
and the largest was approximately $930
billion (Apple, Inc., ticker: AAPL).9 For
the three months ending April 30, 2018,
the average daily volume in SPY shares
was 119 million, and the average value
of shares traded was approximately
$31.8 billion.10 For the same period, the
average daily volume in SPY options
was approximately 4.2 million
contracts.11 The most recent open
interest in SPY options was
approximately 23.9 million contracts as
of May 14, 2018.12
The Exchange believes that, in
addition to the other unique and
proprietary attributes associated with
the Index’s calculation and settlement
methodology, as well as the Exchange’s
fully-electronic, transparent, highlydeterministic trading system, using SPY
options as the components for a
volatility index, in the manner proposed
by the Exchange, will offer a number of
significant, distinct advantages over
other types of volatility indexes. The
Exchange believes that the advantages of
using SPY options have the potential to
result in an extremely liquid volatility
8 SPY holds the shares of up to 500 companies
listed on U.S. securities exchanges (SPY currently
has 506 securities due to multi-share classes for
some companies).
9 See https://www.spdrs.com/product/
fund.seam?ticker=SPY.
10 Calculated using data from Thompson Reuters
as of May 14, 2018.
11 Calculated using data from The Options
Clearing Corp. as of May 14, 2018.
12 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
product with exceptionally tight
spreads, and consequently would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts. First, SPY options
are extremely liquid (they regularly
trade 4–5 million contracts a day, and
have 20–30 million contracts in open
interest). Second, SPY options have
consistently tighter bid-ask spreads than
SPX options, which are the components
for the Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’)
VIX index. Since SPY options are traded
on all 15 option exchanges, it allows
market participants to take advantage of
arbitrage opportunities across multiple
venues. This is in contrast to SPX
options which only trade on Cboe, and
thus those arbitrage opportunities across
venues are not possible. Since SPY
options are traded on all 15 option
exchanges, at the time of the final
settlement of the SPIKES Index on the
Exchange,13 there will be up to 14 other
options exchanges open for trading SPY
options, thus serving as real-time crossreference prices for those SPY options
included in the Exchange’s SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction. This is in
contrast to SPX options during Cboe’s
VIX settlement auction, where there are
no real-time cross-reference prices for
those SPX options included in Cboe’s
VIX settlement, as SPX options are only
traded on one exchange—Cboe. In terms
of spreads, SPY spreads are significantly
tighter and exhibit much higher
consistency with a much narrower range
of typical values and far fewer numbers
of outliers than SPX. For example, when
examining daily closing bid and ask
prices of regular monthly options (with
time to expiry closest to 30 calendar
days) from October 2007 (when SPY
options started trading in penny
increments) to May 2018, and
comparing the following three strike
ranges: (A) 1% ATM—at-the-money
options within 1% (plus or minus) of
the underlying forward price; (B) 1–5%
OTM—out-of-the-money options (higher
strikes for calls, lower strikes for puts);
and (C) 85–95% Puts—far out-of-themoney put options typically included in
volatility index calculations, SPY
13 The final settlement of the SPIKES Index
occurs during the SPIKES Special Settlement
Auction (defined and discussed below), which
commences immediately following the opening of
trading on the Exchange.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
spreads are consistently tighter than
SPX spreads, both across strike prices
and through time, by a factor of 2 to 4
times (this is after normalizing SPY
spreads to SPX spreads, by multiplying
SPY spreads by 10). Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that these advantages
of using SPY options in the manner
proposed by the Exchange, when
combined with the other features and
attributes of the SPIKES Index, have the
potential to result in an extremely liquid
volatility product with exceptionally
tight spreads, and consequently would
not be readily susceptible to fraudulent
and manipulative acts.
As set forth in Exhibit 3–1, the
following are the characteristics of the
Index: (i) The initial index value was
13.05 on January 10, 2005; (ii) the index
value on May 14, 2018 was 13.44; (iii)
the lowest index value since inception
was 9.80 and occurred on July 20, 2007;
and (iv) the highest index value since
inception was 81.85 and occurred on
November 20, 2008.
Index Calculation and Maintenance
As noted above, the Index will be
maintained and calculated by the
Exchange. The level of the Index will
reflect the current expected volatility of
SPY. The Index will be updated on a
real-time basis on each trading day
beginning at 9:30 a.m. and ending at
4:15 p.m. (New York time). If the
current published value of a component
is not available, the last published value
will be used in the calculation. Values
of the Index will be disseminated to the
Options Price Reporting Authority
(‘‘OPRA’’) at least every 15 seconds
during the Exchange’s regular trading
hours, pursuant to Exchange Rules 1802
and 1803. The Exchange is currently
disseminating the cash values of the
Index to OPRA under the ticker symbol
‘SPIKE’ in at least 15 second intervals.
In the event the Index ceases to be
maintained or calculated, or its values
are not disseminated at least every 15
seconds by a widely available source,
the Exchange will not list any additional
series for trading, and may, for the
purpose of maintaining a fair and
orderly market and protecting investors,
limit transactions in certain options on
the Index to closing transactions only.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
EN16JY18.016
t1 Time (in seconds) to near-term expiration
σ1 Estimated volatility computed by
variance swap approximation, near-term
t2 Time (in seconds) to next-term expiration
σ2 Estimated volatility computed by
variance swap approximation, next-term
tM Number of seconds in 30 days (30 ×
86,400 = 2,592,000)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
Exercise and Settlement Value
On the expiration date for expiring
SPIKES options, the Exchange will
calculate the final settlement value of
the Index for expiring SPIKES options.
The expiration date for expiring SPIKES
options is the same day that the final
settlement value of the Index is
calculated for those options. This date is
the Wednesday that is thirty days prior
to the third Friday of the calendar
month immediately following the
month in which the applicable SPIKES
options expire. If that Wednesday or the
Friday that is thirty days following that
Wednesday is an Exchange holiday, the
final settlement value shall be
calculated on the business day
immediately preceding that Wednesday.
The exercise-settlement amount is equal
to the difference between the final
settlement value of the Index and the
exercise price of the option, multiplied
by $100. Exercise will result in the
delivery of cash on the business day
following expiration.
To determine the final settlement
value of the Index, the Exchange will
perform an Index settlement price
calculation which includes all SPY
options that expire 30 days after the
SPIKES settlement that are included in
the settlement (these options are
referred to in this rule filing as the
‘‘constituent options’’). In order to
perform the Index settlement price
calculation, each constituent option will
be assigned a Settlement Reference Price
or ‘‘SRP,’’ defined and discussed in
more detail below. Each SRP will be
determined through a new ‘‘SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction,’’ which
will be conducted once per month, in
the constituent options traded on the
Exchange, on final settlement day. The
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction will
utilize the Exchange’s standard, existing
Opening Process, as defined and fullydescribed in Exchange Rule 503(f), with
a new proposed modification to account
for situations where there remains an
order imbalance 14 that must be filled at
the opening price after the requisite
number of iterations of the imbalance
process takes place under the
Exchange’s existing Opening Process
(the Exchange’s existing Opening
Process provides that the Exchange can
open with an imbalance after the
requisite number of iterations of the
imbalance process takes place).15 This
new proposed modification to the
Exchange’s existing Opening Process to
facilitate the execution of this remaining
must-fill interest is referred to as the
special settlement imbalance process
(‘‘SSIP’’), which will be governed by
new proposed Interpretations and
Policies .06 to Exchange Rule 1809, as
described more fully below. The
Exchange believes that using its fullyelectronic and fully-transparent
Opening Process functionality, which is
accessible to all Members of the
Exchange for participation, in highly
liquid SPY options (which are
simultaneously opening and available
for trading on up to 14 other exchanges,
thus providing real-time cross-reference
prices for the SPY options included in
the settlement) to conduct the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction to settle
expiring SPIKES options, will offer
significant advantages over other types
of volatility index auction processes,
resulting in a robust Opening Process
that presents arbitrage opportunities
across multiple venues to drive prices
into line and reach equilibrium, and
thus consequently would not be readily
susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts.
The Exchange believes that the
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction
would not be readily susceptible to
fraudulent and manipulative acts for a
number of reasons. As discussed more
fully below, the Exchange’s existing
Opening Process runs to completion and
precedes the engagement of the new
SSIP. The existing Opening Process
cannot occur prior to 9:30 a.m. Eastern
Time and only begins following the
dissemination of a quote or trade in the
market for the underlying security.16
Following the dissemination of a quote
or trade in the market for the underlying
security, the System will pause for a
period of time no longer than one half
second to allow the marketplace to
absorb this information.17 When there is
an imbalance,18 the System will
broadcast a System Imbalance Message
(which includes the symbol, side of the
market, quantity of matched contracts,
the imbalance quantity, must fill
quantity (i.e., the number of contracts
that must be filled in order for that
option to open on the Exchange at the
indicated price), quantity of routable
contracts, and price of the affected
series) to subscribers of the Exchange’s
data feeds and begin an Imbalance
Timer 19 not to exceed three seconds.20
16 See
Exchange Rule 503(e)(1).
Exchange notes that the current setting is
one half second.
18 See supra note 14.
19 The Exchange notes that the current Imbalance
Timer setting is one second.
20 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii).
17 The
14 An ‘‘imbalance’’ occurs when there is
insufficient liquidity to satisfy all trading interest
due an execution at a certain price. See Exchange
Rule 503(f)(2)(v).
15 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32937
Under the existing Opening Process the
Exchange may repeat this process up to
three times.21 While the Exchange is
conducting its Opening Process, all 14
other option exchanges will also be
conducting their opening process for
SPY options. As the Exchange works
through its process to resolve
imbalances under the existing Opening
Process, other Exchanges will be open
and will serve as real-time crossreference prices for those SPY options,
enabling market participants to send
orders to the Exchange if there are
pricing anomalies for these SPY options
across venues. The longer it takes the
Exchange to work through the
imbalance, the greater the likelihood
that other exchanges will have opened
their SPY options market and the
natural pressures of a competitive
market will help to eliminate any
pricing anomalies and aid in
eliminating the imbalance on the
Exchange. Further, the Exchange’s
imbalance process is transparent, as
every subscriber to the Exchange’s data
feed receives the imbalance messages,
and every Member of the Exchange can
participate in the imbalance process.
As previously discussed, on the day
the settlement value for the Index is
calculated, the Exchange will conduct
the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction,
using its standard, existing Opening
Process for all options on the Exchange,
including the constituent options.22 The
following paragraphs provide a high
level overview of the Exchange’s
standard, existing Opening Process, in
order to illustrate the complete
operation of the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction.
Pursuant to the standard, existing
Opening Process, if there are no quotes
or orders that lock or cross each other,
the System 23 will open by
disseminating the Exchange’s best bid
and offer among quotes and orders that
exist in the System at that time. If there
are quotes or orders that lock each other,
the System will calculate an Expanded
Quote Range (‘‘EQR’’), as described in
Rule 503(f)(2). The EQR represents the
limits of the range in which transactions
may occur during the Opening
Process.24 The EQR is recalculated any
21 See
Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
a complete description of the Exchange’s
standard, existing Opening Process, refer to
Exchange Rule 503, Openings on the Exchange.
23 The term ‘‘System’’ means the automated
trading system used by the Exchange for the trading
of securities. See Exchange Rule 100.
24 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(i). See also
Exchange Regulatory Circular 2012–02, which sets
forth the tables that describe the calculation of the
EQR for option classes traded on the Exchange, at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/
22 For
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
Continued
16JYN1
32938
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
time a route timer or Imbalance Timer
expires if material conditions of the
market (imbalance size, ABBO 25 price
and size, liquidity price or size, etc.)
have changed during the timer. Once
calculated, the EQR represents the
limits of the range in which transactions
may occur during the Opening
Process.26 The System uses the EQR to
determine the highest and lowest price
of the opening price range.
To calculate the opening price, the
System takes into consideration all valid
Exchange quotes and all valid orders,
together with other exchanges’ markets
for the series, and identifies the price at
which the maximum number of
contracts can trade. If that price is
within the EQR and leaves no
imbalance, the Exchange will open at
that price, executing marketable trading
interest as long as the opening price
includes only Exchange interest.27 If the
calculated opening price included
interest other than solely Exchange
interest, the System will broadcast a
system imbalance message (which
includes the symbol, side of the market,
quantity of matched contracts, the
imbalance quantity, must fill quantity,
quantity of routable contracts, and price
of the affected series) to Exchange
Members 28 and initiate a ‘‘route timer,’’
not to exceed one second.29
If all opening and marketable interest
cannot be completely executed at or
within the EQR without trading at a
price inferior to the ABBO, or cannot
trade at or within the quality opening
market range in the absence of a valid
width NBBO,30 the System will
automatically institute an imbalance
process.31 The System will broadcast a
system imbalance message (which
includes the symbol, side of the market,
quantity of matched contracts, the
imbalance quantity, must fill quantity,
quantity of routable contracts, and price
of the affected series) to subscribers of
the Exchange’s data feeds, and begin an
circular-files/MIAX_Opening_Process_and_Pause_
Timer.pdf.
25 The term ‘‘ABBO’’ or ‘‘Away Best Bid or Offer’’
means the best bid(s) or offer(s) disseminated by
other Eligible Exchanges (defined in Rule 1400(f))
and calculated by the Exchange based on market
information received by the Exchange from OPRA.
See Exchange Rule 100.
26 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(i).
27 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(iv).
28 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
29 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(iv)(A).
30 The term ‘‘NBBO’’ means the national best bid
or offer as calculated by the Exchange based on
market information received by the Exchange from
OPRA. See Exchange Rule 100.
31 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Imbalance Timer, not to exceed three
seconds.32 Market Makers 33 may enter
Opening Only (‘‘OPG’’) eQuotes,34
Auction or Cancel (‘‘AOC’’) eQuotes,35
Standard quotes,36 Opening Orders
(‘‘OPG Orders’’),37 AOC Orders 38 and
limit orders during the Imbalance
Timer. Other Exchange Members may
enter OPG Orders, AOC Orders and
other order types (except those order
types not valid during the Opening
Process, as described in Rule 516)
during the Imbalance Timer.39 If, at the
conclusion of the timer, quotes and
orders submitted during the Imbalance
Timer, or other changes to the ABBO,
would not allow the entire imbalance
amount to trade at the Exchange at or
within the EQR without trading at a
price inferior to the ABBO, the System
will send a new system imbalance
message to Exchange Members and
initiate a route timer for routable Public
Customer orders not to exceed one
second. If, during the route timer,
interest is received by the System which
would allow all interest to trade on the
System (i.e., there is no longer an
imbalance) at the opening price without
trading at a price inferior to other
markets, the System will trade and the
route timer will end.40 The System may
repeat the imbalance process up to three
times (as established by the
Exchange).41 Following completion of
the third imbalance process, if there is
an opening transaction, any unexecuted
contracts from the imbalance not traded
or routed will be cancelled back to the
entering Member if the price for those
contracts crosses the opening price, in
Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(A).
term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to ‘‘Lead
Market Makers’’, ‘‘Primary Lead Market Makers’’
and ‘‘Registered Market Makers’’ collectively. See
Exchange Rule 100.
34 An opening only or ‘‘OPG’’ eQuote is a quote
that can be submitted by a Market Maker only
during the Opening as set forth in Rule 503. OPG
eQuotes will automatically expire at the end of the
Opening Process. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2)(iii).
35 An Auction or Cancel or ‘‘AOC’’ eQuote is a
quote submitted by a Market Maker to provide
liquidity in a specific Exchange process with a time
in force that corresponds with the duration of that
event and will automatically expire at the end of
that event. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2)(ii).
36 A Standard quote is a quote submitted by a
Market Maker that cancels and replaces the Market
Maker’s previous Standard quote, if any. See
Exchange Rule 517(a)(1).
37 An Opening or ‘‘OPG’’ Order is an order that
is valid only for the opening process. See Exchange
Rule 516(h).
38 An Auction-or-Cancel or ‘‘AOC’’ order is a limit
order used to provide liquidity during a specific
Exchange process with a time in force that
corresponds with that event. See Exchange Rule
516(b)(4).
39 See supra note 22.
40 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(2).
41 See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
PO 00000
32 See
33 The
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
effect cancelling that must fill interest.42
That is the completion of the Exchange’s
standard, existing Opening Process.
Now, where an imbalance exists in
constituent options and the final
imbalance process has been conducted
as part of the Exchange’s standard,
existing Opening Process, instead of
cancelling that must fill interest back to
the entering Member, the Exchange is
proposing to conduct the SSIP,43 where
the Exchange will satisfy that must fill
interest. The Exchange does not want to
cancel any must fill interest, as this
liquidity could represent previously
hedged interest that must be unwound.
The SSIP is employed to satisfy all
liquidity identified as must fill which is
creating the imbalance, referred to as the
must fill imbalance. The SSIP is an
iterative process that is designed to
determine a price at which all must fill
imbalance interest can be satisfied.44 In
the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction,
in addition to any order types that may
be regularly accepted by the Exchange,
the Exchange will also accept settlement
auction only orders (‘‘SAO Orders’’) and
settlement auction only eQuotes (‘‘SAO
eQuotes’’) (SAO Orders and SAO
eQuotes are collectively referred to as
‘‘SAOs’’) at any time after the opening
of the Live Order Window (‘‘LOW’’) 45
and the Live Quote Window (‘‘LQW’’),46
respectively. SAOs are specific order
types that allow a Member to
voluntarily tag such order as a SPIKES
strategy order, defined below. All orders
for participation in the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction that are related to
positions in, or a trading strategy
involving, SPIKES Index options
(‘‘SPIKES strategy orders’’), and any
change to or cancellation of any such
order: (i) Must be received prior to the
applicable SPIKES strategy order cut-off
time for the constituent option series, as
determined by the Exchange, which
may be no earlier than the opening of
the LOQ or the LQW, and no later than
the opening of trading in the series. The
Exchange will announce all
determinations regarding changes to the
applicable SPIKES strategy order cut-off
time via Regulatory Circular at least one
day prior to implementation (however
the Exchange anticipates initially
establishing the cut-off time at 9:20 a.m.
42 See
Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5).
proposed Exchange Rule
503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5)(a).
44 See proposed Exchange Rule 1809,
Interpretations and Policies .06.
45 The Exchange notes that the current Live Order
Window opens at 7:30 a.m.
46 The Exchange notes that the current Live Quote
Window setting opens at 9:25 a.m., however the
Exchange plans to open the Live Quote Window for
the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction at 8:30 a.m.
43 See
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
32939
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
Eastern); and (ii) may not be cancelled
or modified after the applicable SPIKES
strategy order cut-off time, unless the
SPIKES strategy order is not executed in
the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction
and the cancellation or modification is
submitted after the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction is concluded
(provided that any such SPIKES strategy
order may be modified or cancelled after
the applicable SPIKES strategy order
cut-off time and prior to the applicable
non-SPIKES strategy order cut-off time
in order to correct a legitimate error, in
which case the Member submitting the
change or cancellation will prepare and
maintain a memorandum setting forth
the circumstances that resulted in the
change or cancellation and will file a
copy of the memorandum with the
Exchange no later than the next
business day in a form and manner
prescribed by the Exchange). In general,
the Exchange will consider orders to be
SPIKES strategy orders for purposes of
Rule 1809 Interpretation and Policy .06,
if the orders possess the following three
characteristics: (A) Are for options with
the expiration that will be used to
calculate the exercise or final settlement
value of the applicable volatility index
option contract; (B) are for options
spanning the full range of strike prices
for the appropriate expiration for
options that will be used to calculate the
exercise or final settlement value of the
applicable volatility index option
contract, but not necessarily every
available strike price; and (C) are for put
options with strike prices less than the
‘‘at-the-money’’ strike price and for call
options with strike prices greater than
the ‘‘at-the-money’’ strike price. They
may also be for put and call options
with ‘‘at-the-money’’ strike prices.
Whether certain orders are SPIKES
strategy orders for purposes of
Interpretation and Policy .06 depends
upon specific facts and circumstances.
The Exchange may also deem order
types other than those provided above
as SPIKES strategy orders if the
Exchange determines that to be the case
based upon the applicable facts and
circumstances.
These requirements are substantially
similar to Cboe’s requirements for
‘‘strategy orders’’ participating in the
VIX settlement auction.47
The Exchange anticipates that market
participants that actively trade SPIKES
options may hedge their positions with
SPY option series that will also be used
to calculate the SPIKES exercise
settlement/final settlement value.
Market participants holding hedged
SPIKES options positions may trade out
of their SPY option series on the
relevant SPIKES expiration/final
settlement date. Specifically, market
participants holding short, hedged
SPIKES options could liquidate that
hedge by selling their SPY options
series, while traders holding long,
hedged SPIKES options could liquidate
their hedge by buying SPY option series.
In order to seek convergence with the
SPIKE exercise/final settlement value,
these market participants may liquidate
their hedges by submitting SPIKES
strategy orders in the appropriate SPY
option series during the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction on the SPIKES
expiration/final settlement date.
The SPIKES strategy order cut-off
time exists because trades to liquidate
hedges can contribute to an order
imbalance during the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction in SPY option series
on expiration/final settlement dates. For
example, traders liquidating hedges
could predominantly be on one side of
the market and those market
participants’ orders may create buy or
sell order imbalances during the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction in SPY
option series on expiration/final
settlement dates. As a result of having
a SPIKES strategy order cut-off time in
place, the Exchange has created a
defined window to encourage
participation in the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction among market
participants who may wish to place off-
setting orders against imbalances to
which SPIKES strategy orders may have
contributed. Additionally, by
precluding the modification or
cancellation of SPIKES strategy orders
from occurring after the cut-off time, the
Exchange is ensuring that the order
book reflects bona-fide interest for
execution, and is a feature designed to
prevent manipulation of the final
settlement price.
Following is a description of the
proposed operation of the SSIP portion
of the SPIKES Special Settlement
Auction, as set forth in Exchange Rule
1809, proposed Interpretations and
Policies .06. To begin the SSIP, the
System will broadcast a system
imbalance message to all subscribers of
the Exchange’s relevant data feed and
begin an SSIP Imbalance Timer, the
duration of which is to be determined
by the Exchange, not to exceed ten
seconds, and communicated via
Regulatory Circular. During the SSIP
Imbalance Timer, the System accepts all
quote and order types supported during
the standard Opening Process. Next, the
System will evaluate the must fill
imbalance and adjust the EQR by a
defined amount by appending to the
EQR (adding to offers or subtracting
from bids) the EQR value (as previously
determined by the Exchange and
communicated via Regulatory Circular).
During the SSIP, the allowable EQR will
be increased .5 times the EQR value
upon each iteration of the SSIP. The
SSIP will be repeated until a price is
reached at which there is no remaining
must fill imbalance.
An example of a SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction (which utilizes the
Exchange’s standard, existing Opening
Process, as modified by the SSIP), for a
constituent option is provided to
illustrate the process.
Example
SPY Mar 280 Call—constituent option
The Exchange market for the
constituent option is as follows:
Bid size
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
PLMM ...............................................................................................................................
MM1 .................................................................................................................................
The Exchange receives an SAO Order
to purchase 500 SPY March 280
contracts with a ‘‘market’’ price.
Accordingly, there are 150 contracts
offered at $1.10 and a market order 48 to
buy 500 contracts. This results in the
following:
47 See Cboe Rule 6.2, Hybrid Opening (and
Sometimes Closing) System (‘‘HOSS’’),
Interpretations and Policies .01, Modified Opening
Procedure for Series Used to Calculate the Exercise/
Final Settlement Values of Volatility Indexes.
48 A market order is an order to buy or sell a
stated number of option contracts at the best price
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bid
100
50
Offer
1.01
1.02
Offer size
1.10
1.10
100
50
Imbalance Quantity ...................
Must Fill Imbalance Quantity ....
Matched Quantity .....................
350
350
150
available at the time of execution. See Exchange
Rule 516(a).
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
32940
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
The Exchange’s standard Opening
Process is used, and because an
imbalance exists, the Exchange’s
Standard Opening Imbalance Process (as
defined in Rule 503(f)(2)(vii))
commences. The EQR is expanded by
the EQR value of $0.10,49 becoming
$1.02 × $1.20.
After three iterations of the
Exchange’s Standard Opening
Imbalance Process,50 if the must fill
imbalance quantity has not been
satisfied, the new SSIP will be
employed. (For purposes of this
example, assume that all such three
iterations have completed and the must
fill imbalance quantity still has not been
satisfied.)
The SSIP will begin by using an EQR
expanded by 1.0 times the EQR value
($0.10). Therefore, the EQR for the first
iteration of SSIP is $1.02 × $1.20.
Since no responses have yet been
received, a system imbalance message is
broadcast to all subscribers of the
Exchange’s data feeds and the SSIP
auction period is started: The following
responses are received:
• @20 Milliseconds BD1 response, AOC
Order to sell 200 @$1.20 arrives
At the end of the SSIP auction period,
the System evaluates the orders and
responses to determine if the must fill
imbalance quantity can be satisfied at,
or within, the EQR.
The Exchange market for the
constituent option is as follows:
Bid size
PLMM ...............................................................................................................................
MM1 .................................................................................................................................
BD1 ..................................................................................................................................
Bid
100
50
....................
1.01
1.02
....................
The offer of 150 contracts at $1.10
remains and there are now an additional
200 contracts offered at $1.20. This
results in the following:
contracts offered and a buy order for 500
at the market.
Because an imbalance still exists, a
second iteration of the SSIP will begin
by expanding the side of the EQR
Imbalance Quantity ...................
150 opposite the must fill imbalance
Must Fill Imbalance Quantity ....
150 quantity quote range, from the original
Matched Quantity .....................
350
EQR value to the quote range plus 1.5
times the original EQR value ($0.10),
A must fill imbalance quantity of 150
becoming $1.25 ($1.10 + $0.15).
contracts priced through the EQR
A new system imbalance message is
remains, as there are a total of 350
broadcast to all subscribers of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1.10
1.10
1.20
Offer size
100
50
200
Exchange’s data feeds and a second
SSIP auction period is started:
The following responses are received:
• @500 milliseconds MM2 response,
AOC eQuote to sell 1000 @ $1.23
arrives
At the end of the SSIP auction period,
the System evaluates the orders and
responses to see if the must fill
imbalance quantity can be satisfied at,
or within, the EQR.
The Exchange market for the
constituent option is as follows:
Bid size
PLMM ...............................................................................................................................
MM1 .................................................................................................................................
BD1 ..................................................................................................................................
MM2 .................................................................................................................................
Offer
Bid
100
50
....................
....................
1.01
1.02
....................
....................
Offer
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.23
Offer size
100
50
200
1000
The offer of 150 contracts at $1.10
remains, as well as the 200 contracts
offered at $1.20. In addition, there is
now an offer to sell 1,000 contracts at
$1.23.
In this case, the entire must fill
imbalance quantity can be satisfied at
$1.23. The SAO Order to purchase 500
contracts at the market price is filled in
the following fashion:
• The SAO Order buys 100 from the
PLMM @$1.23
• The SAO Order buys 50 from MM1 @
$1.23
• The SAO Order buys 200 from BD1 @
$1.23
• The SAO Order buys 150 from MM2
@$1.23
Once there is no remaining must fill
imbalance, SAOs, AOC Orders, AOC
eQuotes, OPG Orders, and OPG eQuotes
submitted into the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction are cancelled. Any
unfilled day limit orders and GTC
orders that are priced at the Opening
Price are placed on the Book and
managed by the System.
As previously discussed, the System
will assign an SRP to each constituent
option to facilitate the calculation of the
final settlement price of the Index. If the
System opens the constituent option
with a trade, the System assigns the
constituent option an SRP equal to the
trade price in that option. If there is no
locking or crossing interest and the
System opens the constituent option
without a trade, and the bid-ask spread
is at or within a range as defined by the
Exchange in an SRP opening width table
and communicated via Regulatory
Circular, the System assigns the
constituent option an SRP equal to the
midpoint of the bid and ask prices. If
the bid-ask spread is not within a range
as defined in the SRP opening width
table, the System will conduct an
additional process to determine the SRP
of the constituent option, as follows.
First, the System will start a
settlement reference price timer
(‘‘SRPT’’) (the duration of which will be
defined by the Exchange not to exceed
sixty seconds and communicated via
Regulatory Circular). If, during the
SRPT, there is a trade on the Exchange,
the System will set the SRP equal to the
trade price. If, during the SRPT, the bidask spread changes so that it is within
a range defined in the settlement price
opening width table, the System will set
the SRP equal to the midpoint of the bid
and ask price.
49 The EQR value for options bid $0.00 to $1.00
is $0.05; $1.01 to $2.00 is $0.10; $3.01 to $5.00 is
$0.20; $5.01 to $10.00 is $0.30; $10.01 to $20.00 is
$0.50; $20.01 to $40.00 is $0.70; and $40.01 and
above is $0.90. See also supra note 14.
50 The System may repeat the Standard Opening
Imbalance Process up to three times (as established
by the Exchange). See Exchange Rule
503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
If the SRPT expires, the System will
set the SRP equal to the Reference Price
(the current price of that option utilizing
the cash index calculation formula,
described above) of the constituent
option if it is equal to or inside the
MBBO.51 If the Reference Price is nonzero and less than the Exchange’s bid,
then the System will set the SRP equal
to the Exchange’s bid. If the Reference
Price is non-zero and greater than the
Exchange’s ask, then the System will set
the SRP equal to the Exchange’s ask. If
the Reference Price is zero and if one or
both adjacent constituent options have a
non-zero SRP, the constituent option
will be excluded from the calculation. If
the Reference Price is zero and there are
multiple adjacent constituent options
with a current Reference Price of zero,
the System will use the midpoint of the
NBBO for the SRP if the NBBO bid-ask
spread is at or within a range defined in
the settlement price opening width
table. If the NBBO bid-ask spread is not
within a range defined in the settlement
price opening width table, the System
will wait for either a trade, or a bid-ask
spread that is within a range defined in
the settlement price opening width
table. Once all constituent options have
been assigned an SRP, the System will
perform the final settlement price
calculation of the Index.
The Exchange believes that this fullyelectronic and fully-transparent SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction process,
which is accessible to all Members of
the Exchange for participation, in highly
liquid SPY options (which are
simultaneously opening and available
for trading on 14 other exchanges, thus
providing real-time cross-reference
prices for the SPY options included in
the settlement) to settle expiring SPIKES
options, offers significant advantages
over other types of volatility auction
processes, and will result in a robust
opening process that presents arbitrage
opportunities across multiple venues to
drive prices into line and reach
equilibrium, and thus would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts.
Contract Specifications
The contract specifications for options
on the Index are set forth in Exhibit 3–
2. The Index is a broad-based index, as
defined in MIAX Options Rule 1801(k),
for the purpose of determining which of
the Exchange’s rules apply to options on
the Index.52 Options on the Index are
51 The term ‘‘MBBO’’ means the best bid or offer
on the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 100.
52 The proposed rule change relates solely to the
Exchange’s request to list and trade options on the
Index and does not represent a request for the
Commission to determine whether the Index is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
European-style and cash-settled.
Standard trading hours for index
options (9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., New
York time) will apply to the Index.53
The Exchange proposes to apply margin
requirements for the purchase and sale
of options on the Index that are
identical to those applied for other
broad-based index options traded on
other options exchanges.
The trading of options on the Index
will be subject to the trading halt
procedures applicable to index options
traded on the Exchange.54 Options on
the Index will be quoted and traded in
U.S. dollars.55 Accordingly, all
Exchange and Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) members shall be
able to accommodate trading, clearance
and settlement of the Index without
alteration. Furthermore, the Exchange
believes that OCC will be able to
accommodate trading, clearance and
settlement of options on the Index
without having to obtain any additional
approval.
The Exchange proposes that the
minimum trading increments for
options on the Index shall be $0.05 for
series trading below $3, and $0.10 for
series trading at or above $3. This is the
same pricing convention utilized by
Cboe for VIX options. Accordingly, the
Exchange is proposing to amend
Exchange Rule 404, Series of Option
Contracts Open for Trading, by adopting
new Interpretations and Policies .11 to
specify the minimum trading
increments for options on the Index.
The Exchange proposes that there
shall be no position or exercise limits
for options on the Index. As noted
above, the Index will settle using
published prices and quotes from its
corresponding SPY options. Because the
size of SPY options market (as well as
the underlying SPY market) is so large,
the Exchange believes that there is
minimal risk of manipulation by virtue
of position size in SPIKES options. The
Exchange notes that options on Cboe’s
VIX are also not subject to any position
or exercise limits.56 Accordingly, the
Exchange is proposing to amend
Exchange Rule 1804(a) to specify that
there will be no position limits and no
‘‘narrow-based index’’ as that term is defined under
the Act. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(55)(B).
53 See Exchange Rule 1808.
54 See Exchange Rule 1808(c).
55 See Exchange Rule 1809(a)(1).
56 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.54019
(June 20, 2006), 71 FR 36569 (June 27, 2006) (SR–
CBOE–2006–55). Additionally, the Exchange notes
there are currently a number of actively-traded
broad-based index options, i.e., DJX, NDX, SPX, that
are also not subject to any position or exercise
limits.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32941
exercise limits for options on the
SPIKES Index.
The Exchange initially proposes to list
options on the Index in up to twelve
(12) standard monthly expirations. This
is the same number of monthly
expirations that are permitted for VIX
options, pursuant to Cboe Rule
24.9(a).57 Accordingly, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Exchange Rule
1809(a)(3) to permit the listing of up to
twelve (12) standard monthly
expirations for SPIKES options. The
Exchange is also proposing to make
changes to Exchange Rule 1809(a)(3), in
order to conform the structure of such
rule to Cboe’s Rule 24.9(a), to allow for
the listing of short-term options and
quarterly options.
The Exchange proposes to set the
minimum strike price interval for
options on the Index at $0.50 where the
strike price is less than $15, $1 or
greater where the strike price is between
$15 and $200, and $5 or greater where
the strike price is greater than $200. The
Exchange believes that $0.50 and $1
strike price intervals will provide
investors with greater flexibility by
allowing them to establish positions that
are better tailored to meet their
investment objectives. Further, as
proposed, when new series of options
on the Index with a new expiration date
are opened for trading, or when
additional series of options on the Index
in an existing expiration date are
opened for trading as the current value
of the Index moves substantially from
the exercise prices of series already
opened, the exercise prices of such new
or additional series shall be reasonably
related to the current value of the Index
at the time such series are first opened
for trading.58 The Exchange, however,
proposes to eliminate this range
limitation that will limit the number of
$1 strikes that may be listed in options
on the Index. The Exchange’s proposal
to set minimum strike price intervals
without a range limitation is identical to
strike price intervals adopted by Cboe
for the VIX.59 Accordingly, the
Exchange is proposing to amend
Exchange Rule 1809(c), Procedures for
Adding and Deleting Strike Prices, to
adopt new sub-section (5) to specify the
57 Cboe Rule 24.9 also permits for the listing of
up to six weekly VIX expirations.
58 See Exchange Rule 1809(c)(3). The term
‘‘reasonably related to the current index value of the
underlying index’’ means that the exercise price is
within thirty percent (30%) of the current index
value, as defined in MIAX Options 1809(c)(4).
59 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63155
(October 21, 2010), 75 FR 66402 (October 28, 2010)
(SR–CBOE–2010–096).
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
32942
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
minimum strike price intervals for
options on the Index.
The trading of options on the Index
shall be subject to the same rules that
presently govern the trading of
Exchange index options, including sales
practice rules, margin requirements, and
trading rules. In addition, long-term
option series having up to sixty months
to expiration may be traded.60 The
trading of long-term options on the
Index shall also be subject to the same
rules that govern the trading of all the
Exchange’s index options, including
sales practice rules, margin
requirements, and trading rules.
Further, pursuant to Interpretations and
Policies .01 of MIAX Options Rule 1809,
the Exchange may also list Short Term
Option Series and pursuant to
Interpretations and Policies .02 of MIAX
Options Rule 1809, the Exchange may
also list Quarterly Options Series,
respectively, on the Index.
Chapter XIII of the Exchange’s rules is
designed to protect public customer
trading and shall apply to trading in
options on the Index. Specifically,
paragraphs (a) and (b) of MIAX Options
Rule 1307 prohibit Members from
accepting a customer order to purchase
or write an option, including options on
the Index, unless such customer’s
account has been approved in writing
by a designated Options Principal of the
Member. Additionally, MIAX Options
Rule 1309 regarding suitability is
designed to ensure that options,
including options on the Index, are only
sold to customers capable of evaluating
and bearing the risks associated with
trading in this instrument. Further,
MIAX Options Rule 1310 permits
Members to exercise discretionary
power with respect to trading options,
including options on the Index, in a
customer’s account only if the Member
has received prior written authorization
from the customer and the account had
been accepted in writing by a
designated Options Principal. MIAX
Options Rule 1310 also requires
designated Options Principals or
Representatives of a Member to approve
and initial each discretionary order,
including discretionary orders for
options on the Index, on the day the
discretionary order is entered. Finally,
MIAX Options Rule 1308, Supervision
of Accounts, MIAX Options Rule 1311,
Confirmation to Customers, and MIAX
Options Rule 1315, Delivery of Current
Options Disclosure Documents and
Prospectus, will also apply to trading in
options on the Index.
60 See
Exchange Rule 1809(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Surveillance and Capacity
The Exchange has an adequate
surveillance program in place for
options traded on the Index and intends
to apply those same program procedures
that it applies to the Exchange’s other
options products. In addition, several
new surveillances related to the Index
will be added to the MIAX surveillance
program. The Exchange has a Regulatory
Services Agreement (‘‘RSA’’) in place
with the Financial Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’) to conduct cross-market
surveillances on its behalf and has
expanded the RSA to include a new
options pattern: Index Expiration for
Cash Settled, A.M.-Settled, Index
Options. The purpose of this pattern is
to determine whether any market
participants influenced the settlement
price of an a.m. cash-settled index
product to benefit their expiring index
option position.
In addition to the Index Expiration for
Cash Settled report mentioned above,
both MIAX Option Regulation and
FINRA Options Regulation will
manually review options activity during
each monthly settlement process. After
manually reviewing settlement process
activity over the course of months,
MIAX Options and FINRA will
determine whether additional reports or
enhancements to the cash settled
report(s) are required.
Further, the Exchange’s regulatory
department conducts routine
surveillance in dozens of discrete areas.
Index products and their respective
symbols are integrated into the
Exchange’s existing surveillance system
architecture and are thus subject to the
relevant surveillance processes. This is
true for both surveillance system
processing and manual processes that
support the Exchange’s surveillance
program. Additionally, the Exchange is
also a member of the Intermarket
Surveillance Group (ISG) under the
Intermarket Surveillance Group
Agreement, dated June 20, 1994. The
members of the ISG include all of the
U.S. registered stock and options
markets.61 The members of ISG work
together to coordinate surveillance and
investigative information sharing in the
stock and options markets.
The Exchange represents that it has
the necessary System capacity to
support additional quotations and
messages that will result from the listing
and trading of options on the Index.
61 For the current list of members of the ISG, see
https://www.isgportal.org/isgPortal/public/
members.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of the Act,62 in general
and with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,63 in
particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest; and
are not designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposed change will permit
options trading in the Index pursuant to
rules designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices and
promote just and equitable principles of
trade. In particular, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change will
further the Exchange’s goal of
introducing new and innovative
products to the marketplace. The
Exchange believes that listing options
on the Index will provide an
opportunity for investors to hedge, or
speculate on, the market risk associated
with changes in volatility.
The Exchange believes that the
enhanced features to the Index may
serve to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
its price dragging technique and
truncation rule, in combination with the
immense liquidity of the underlying
options, make the Index less susceptible
to market manipulation. The price
dragging technique, which is used to
determine the ongoing Reference Price
for each individual option used in the
calculation of the Index, helps prevent
market manipulation by utilizing the
most recent trade price as the Reference
Price. The Exchange believes that this
feature may be a more accurate
methodology than only using the midpoint of the bid and ask, which is the
methodology utilized by a competing
volatility index. The Exchange believes
the price dragging technique may create
a more accurate and stable index value
which better represents volatility in the
market by emphasizing the actual trade
price versus simply the mid-point
spread.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes
that the enhanced feature may provide
62 15
63 15
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78a et seq.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
greater consistency in the marketplace
because the price dragging technique
results in a Reference Price that is
supported by the fair market value at the
time versus using the mid-point, which
is not necessarily an accurate
representation of the fair market value at
the time.
Furthermore, the truncation method,
another key enhancement in the Index,
determines how far away from the
money to exclude strikes from the
volatility calculation. This helps to
ensure that values are not being
included that would skew the resulting
Index value by taking into account OTM
options which are too far away to be
accurately priced into the Index value
calculation. By excluding these options
from the calculation, the Exchange
believes it is able to provide a more
reliable Index value. The Exchange
believes that its exclusion methodology
is a material enhancement over existing
methodologies, and should result in a
calculation outcome that better reflects
the expected measure of volatility.
As discussed previously, the price
dragging method reduces the variability
of the option inputs (which also referred
to herein as the Reference Prices). Since
the option inputs have reduced
variability, and those values are used to
determine which strikes make it into the
Index’s calculation, the combination of
price dragging and exclusion rules work
together to, in the Exchange’s opinion,
create a more reliable Index value. The
Exchange believes that a more reliable
Index value will benefit investors and
market participants trading options on
the Index, will promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and should
serve to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices.
The Exchange believes that, in
addition to the other unique and
proprietary attributes associated with
the Index’s calculation and settlement
methodology, as well as the Exchange’s
fully-electronic, transparent, highlydeterministic trading system, using SPY
options as the components for a
volatility index, in the manner proposed
by the Exchange, will offer a number of
significant, distinct advantages over
other types of volatility indexes. The
Exchange believes that the advantages of
using SPY options have the potential to
result in an extremely liquid volatility
product with exceptionally tight
spreads, and consequently would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts. First, SPY options
are extremely liquid (they regularly
trade 4–5 million contracts a day, and
have 20–30 million contracts in open
interest). Second, SPY options have
consistently tighter bid-ask spreads than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
SPX options, which are the components
for Cboe’s VIX index. Since SPY options
are traded on all 15 option exchanges,
it allows market participants to take
advantage of arbitrage opportunities
across multiple venues. This is in
contrast to SPX options which only
trade on Cboe, and thus those arbitrage
opportunities across venues are not
possible. Also, at the time of final
settlement, there are 14 other options
exchanges on which SPY options are
traded, and may serve as real-time crossreference prices for SPY options during
the Exchange’s SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction. This is in contrast
to SPX options during Cboe’s VIX
settlement auction, where there is no
such reference market for SPX options
open during the time of the VIX
settlement, as SPX options are only
traded on one exchange—Cboe. In terms
of spreads, SPY spreads are significantly
tighter and exhibit much higher
consistency with a much narrower range
of typical values and far fewer numbers
of outliers than SPX. SPY spreads are
consistently tighter than SPX spreads,
both across strike prices and through
time, by a factor of 2 to 4 times (this is
after normalizing SPY spreads to SPX
spreads, by multiplying SPY spreads by
10). Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that these advantages of using SPY
options in the manner proposed by the
Exchange, when combined with the
other features and attributes of the
SPIKES Index, have the potential to
result in an extremely liquid volatility
product with exceptionally tight
spreads, and consequently would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts.
The Exchange is currently
disseminating the cash values of the
Index to OPRA under the ticker symbol
‘SPIKE’ in at least 15 second intervals.
The Exchange believes that
disseminating updates in at least 15
second intervals will benefit investors
and other market participants, as they
will be better able to track the current
value of the Index at any given period
of time, will promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and should prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices.
The Exchange believes that using its
fully-electronic and fully-transparent
Opening Process functionality, which is
accessible to all Members of the
Exchange for participation, in highly
liquid SPY options (which are
simultaneously opening and available
for trading on 14 other exchanges, thus
providing real-time cross-reference
prices for the SPY options included in
the settlement) to conduct the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction to settle
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32943
expiring SPIKES options, will offer
significant advantages over other types
of volatility auction processes, resulting
in a robust opening process that
presents arbitrage opportunities across
multiple venues to drive prices into line
and reach equilibrium, and thus
benefiting investors and other market
participants, promoting just and
equitable principles of trade, and should
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices.
The Exchange believes that having a
SPIKES strategy order modification and
cancellation cut-off time during the
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction in
SPY option series on expiration/final
settlement date will help to ensure that
the order book reflects bona-fide interest
for execution, and is a feature designed
to prevent manipulation of the final
settlement price.
Volatility-focused products have
become more prominent over the past
several years, and in a number of
different formats and types, including
ETFs, exchange-traded notes, exchangetraded options, and exchange-traded
futures. Such products offer investors
the opportunity to manage their
volatility risks associated with an
underlying asset class. Currently, most
of the products focus on underlying
equity indexes or equity-based
portfolios.
The Exchange proposes to introduce a
cash-settled options contract on a new
volatility index, which focuses on
equity exposure using options on SPY.
SPY is the largest and most liquid ETF
in the United Sates, and the most
actively traded equity option product.
The Exchange believes that because the
Index is derived from published SPY
options prices, and given the immense
liquidity found in the individual
portfolio components of SPY, the
concern that the Index will be subject to
market manipulation is greatly reduced.
Therefore, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change to list options
on the Index is appropriate.
The Exchange further notes that
Exchange Rules that apply to the trading
of other index options currently traded
on the Exchange would also apply to the
trading of options on the Index.
Additionally, the trading of options on
the Index would be subject to, among
others, Exchange Rules governing
margin requirements and trading halt
procedures.
Finally, the Exchange represents that
it has an adequate surveillance program
in place to detect manipulative trading
in options on the Index. The Exchange
also represents that it has the necessary
systems capacity to support the new
options series. Additionally, as stated in
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
32944
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2018 / Notices
the filing, the Exchange has rules in
place designed to protect public
customer trading.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. . The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule
change will facilitate the listing and
trading of a novel index option product
that will enhance competition among
market participants, to the benefit of
investors and the marketplace.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Among other things, the Exchange
believes that the use of SPY options in
the manner proposed by the Exchange,
when combined with the other features
and attributes of the SPIKES Index, has
the potential to result in an extremely
liquid volatility product with
exceptionally tight spreads, and
consequently would not be readily
susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts. In particular, the
Commission seeks comment on the
following:
• Do commenters agree with this
overall assertion by the Exchange?
• Do commenters believe any
proposed features (e.g., inclusion of
relatively illiquid OTM (Out-of-theMoney) put SPY options in SPIKES
settlement, SPIKES settlement via a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jul 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
short pre-open auction of SPY options,
cash-settlement) of the SPIKES
settlement could make options on
SPIKES susceptible to manipulation?
Why or why not?
• Do commenters believe the
definition of ‘‘SPIKES strategy orders’’ is
sufficiently clear? Why or why not?
• Do commenters believe the
proposed SPIKES strategy order cut-off
time is adequate to provide sufficient
time to work off order imbalances
during the SPIKES Special Settlement
Auction in SPY option series on final
settlement dates? Why or why not?
• Do commenters believe precluding
the submission, modification, or
cancellation of SPIKES strategy orders
after the proposed cut-off time will be
effective in reducing the likelihood of
manipulation in the calculation of the
final settlement value for the SPIKES
Index? Why or why not?
• Do commenters believe the
proposed exclusion rule/truncation
method, which is designed to remove
SPY option price inputs deemed less
reliable in order to avoid a potential
negative impact on the SPIKES
calculation outcome, will be effective in
reducing the likelihood of manipulation
in the calculation of the final settlement
value for the SPIKES Index? Why or
why not?
• The Exchange discusses the price
dragging technique used for intraday
calculation of the SPIKES Index value to
determine the Reference Price for each
of the individual SPY options used in
the calculation of the Index value. Do
commenters believe that the price
dragging technique would improve
Index stability by smoothing out options
price inputs into the Index calculation,
especially as SPY options quotes are
rapidly changing? Do commenters agree
that the price dragging technique will
result in a smoother Index price? What
are commenters’ views on any potential
effect of the price dragging technique, in
which the primary factor considered
when updating the Reference Price for
each of the individual SPY options is
whether or not a trade has occurred, on
the price efficiency of the SPIKES Index,
including whether the price dragging
technique may result in stale prices?
• Do commenters believe that the lack
of proposed position limits on cashsettled SPIKES Index options could
make the options more susceptible to
manipulation? 64 Why or why not?
64 See, e.g., Hans R. Dutt & Lawrence E. Harris,
Position Limits for Cash-Settled Derivative
Contracts, 25 J. Futures Mkts. 945 (2005) (arguing
that limits on the positions that traders can carry
into final settlement can be used to mitigate the
susceptibility to manipulation of cash-settled
derivative contracts).
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2018–14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–14, and
should be submitted on or before
August 6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.65
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–15178 Filed 7–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
65 17
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32932-32944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15178]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-83619; File No. SR-MIAX-2018-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations: Notice of Filing of a Proposed
Rule Change by Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC to List and
Trade on the Exchange Options on the SPIKESTM Index
July 11, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on June 28, 2018, Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (``MIAX Options'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and trade on the Exchange options on
the SPIKESTM Index (``SPIKES'' or the ``Index''), a new
index that measures expected 30-day volatility of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Trust. The Exchange also proposes to list and trade short-term,
quarterly, and long-term options on SPIKES. Options on SPIKES will be
cash-settled and will have European-style exercise provisions.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/, at MIAX Options'
principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[[Page 32933]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently adopted generic rules relating to the listing
and trading of cash-settled index options on the Exchange.\3\ The
Exchange now proposes to amend its rules to provide for the listing and
trading on the Exchange of options on the Index. The Index measures
expected 30-day volatility of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (commonly
known and referred to by its ticker symbol, ``SPY''). Options on the
Index will be cash-settled and will have European-style exercise
provisions. In addition to regular options, the Exchange proposes to
also list short-term, quarterly, and long-term options on the Index.
The Index is calculated using published real-time prices and bid/ask
quotes of SPY options. The Index represents annualized expected
volatility and is quoted in percentage points.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81739 (September 27,
2017), 82 FR 46111 (October 3, 2017) (SR-MIAX-2017-39) (Order
approving the adoption of rules relating to trading in index
options).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Design and Composition
The calculation of the Index is based on the methodology developed
by T3i Pty Ltd, a firm that develops proprietary indexes, including
derivatives-based indexes and options-enhanced indexes. The Index will
be calculated and maintained by the Exchange. The Index measures
expected 30-day volatility of SPY, historically the largest and most
actively traded ETF in the United States as measured by its assets
under management and the value of shares traded.
Like most indices, the Index has a defined rules-based approach to
selecting components--a series of options on the SPY--and weighting
them to derive a single price for the Index.
Therefore, the formula for expected T-term variance is as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JY18.014
The Index is calculated using only standard options on SPY that
expire on the third Friday of each calendar month. Although weekly
options on SPY are available, these are not used in the calculation of
the Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Since the SPIKES Index is calculated on a real-time basis,
the Exchange uses 1-second precision to measure time in years (which
is expressed to at least eight decimal places, by dividing the
number of seconds to option expiration by the total number of
seconds in a year).
\5\ This price is also known as the Reference Price, as defined
and discussed in more detail below, in the following subsection 1,
Determine Option Prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The calculation linearly interpolates between the variances of two
monthly expirations--near-term (the closest expiration more than two
full days into the future) and next-term (the monthly expiration
following the near-term). This expiration selection method is used to
avoid using highly irregular option prices close to the options
settlement date. The 30-day point is typically in between these two
expirations and the Index is interpolated between the volatilities of
these two terms. When the closest
[[Page 32934]]
expiration is too close to expiry (less than two full days), rolling to
the third-closest expiration occurs. This rolling rule serves to reduce
spurious variability in the Index by means of minimizing the period of
``extrapolation'' between the two expirations. The switch from closest
to third-closest expiry rarely has any noticeable impact on the actual
Index value, as the weight of the switched term is close to zero. The
following describes the methodology used to price the Index in greater
detail.
1. Determine Option Prices
SPIKES uses a proprietary ``price dragging'' technique to determine
the ongoing price for each individual option used in the calculation of
the Index (``Reference Price''), to calculate the Index, as follows:
Initially set all prices to 0;
If there is a trade, the price of the option is always set
to the trade price;
If there is not yet a trade, on the opening quote, the
opening bid is used as the current price;
For newly-placed ask (bid) quotes, if the ask (bid) is
lower (higher) than current Reference Price, the option price is set to
ask (bid).
The Exchange believes that this method should materially reduce
erratic movements of the Index value as quotations on out-of-the-money
(``OTM'') options are rapidly altered during times of low liquidity.
The Exchange believes that this method is a material enhancement over
existing calculation methodologies, and should result in improved Index
stability by smoothing out options price inputs into the Index
calculation, especially as options quotes are rapidly changing.
An example of the price dragging technique is given below:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Difference b/
Change in t SPIKES
Time Market SPIKES input Change in Midpoint midpoint input and
\6\ SPIKES input input input midpoint
input
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:30:00................................... 0 x 0....................... 0.00 .............. 0.00 .............. 0.00
9:31:10................................... 2.35 x 2.65................. 2.35 .............. 2.50 .............. 0.15
9:31:10................................... Trade @ 2.38................ 2.38 .............. 2.50 .............. 0.12
.03
9:33:01................................... 2.31 x 2.65................. 2.38 .............. 2.48 .............. 0.10
.02
9:33:48................................... 2.31 x 2.39................. 2.38 .............. 2.35 .............. 0.03
.13
9:36:41................................... Trade @ 2.37................ 2.37 .............. 2.35 .............. 0.02
.01
9:38:34................................... 2.32 x 2.40................. 2.37 .............. 2.36 .............. 0.01
.01
9:38:52................................... 2.00 x 6.00................. 2.37 .............. 4.00 .............. 1.63
1.64
9:39:02................................... Trade @ 3.10................ 3.10 .............. 4.00 .............. 0.90
.73
9:39:20................................... 3.05 x 3.50................. 3.10 .............. 3.275 .............. 0.175
0.725
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The example shows a hypothetical market for a specific option used
as an input to SPIKES. The results of price dragging are shown in the
column ``SPIKES Input,'' and a hypothetical result using an alternative
method of calculating the option input price using the midpoint method
is shown in the column ``Midpoint Input.'' The difference between the
result using the SPIKES Input and the Midpoint Input is shown in the
``Difference b/t SPIKES Input and Midpoint Input Column.'' The shaded
cells illustrate changes in the input prices of the two methods after
each update to the market. The Exchange believes that the example
illustrates that, given the hypothetical market prices, the price
dragging technique results in a smoother Index price because it relies
primarily on trade prices (which are more indicative of actual value),
only using quote prices when a quote bid is higher than the last trade
or a quote offer is lower than the last trade. Additionally, the Index
performance has been evaluated using alternative calculation
methodologies. This evaluation included a comparison of the performance
of the Index when calculated using the price dragging technique, versus
the performance of the Index when calculated using an alternative
midpoint method, and covered periods of both low and high volatility in
SPY. The Exchange believes that the price dragging technique
consistently outperformed the midpoint method, as measured by the
Index's overall stability and smoothness of price changes, resulting
from primarily relying on trade prices (which are more indicative of
actual value).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This value is also referred to as the Reference Price, as
defined above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The price dragging technique is used to determine the Reference
Price for each individual option used in the Index calculation. The
Exchange believes that this technique is a material enhancement that
may improve Index stability by smoothing out options price inputs into
the Index calculation, especially as options quotes are rapidly
changing. The price dragging technique is used for intraday calculation
of the Index. The Exchange believes that the price dragging technique
may be a more accurate and effective way to determine the Index value
because the primary factor considered when updating the Reference Price
is whether or not a trade has occurred. If a trade occurred, the
Reference Price is set to the trade price. This methodology represents
a Reference Price which is based on a ``meeting of the minds,'' or the
creation of a contract. The Exchange believes that this more accurately
represents the fair value at that given time, and thus will benefit
investors and market participants trading options on the Index.
A competing volatility index uses an alternative method for
calculating its reference price. Specifically, that competing
volatility index utilizes the mid-point of the bid and ask and only
updates the reference price when there is a change in the bid or ask.
The
[[Page 32935]]
Exchange believes that this methodology could be less reliable because
it creates the potential for skewed reference prices in the event of a
wide market. Options are often quoted in bulk by market makers, which
in some cases, causes a divergence from the orthodox supply-demand
dynamics as quotes are constantly updated across a series of strikes
throughout the day. As a result, there can be more notable movements
within the bid/ask spread that impact the calculation of an index based
on mid-point prices.
Therefore, the Exchange believes that the price dragging technique
may create a more accurate and stable Index value and may better
represent volatility in the market by emphasizing the actual trade
price versus simply the midpoint spread. Furthermore, the Exchange
believes that the enhanced feature may provide greater consistency in
the marketplace because the price dragging technique results in a
Reference Price that is supported by the fair market value at the time
versus using the mid-point, which is not necessarily an accurate
representation of the fair market value at the time.
2. Select the Options
Another key feature of SPIKES is its exclusion rule (truncation
method). The exclusion rule determines how far away from the money to
exclude strikes from the volatility calculation. For each of the
expirations, the securities to be used in the calculation are selected
by removing in-the-money and OTM options, as follows:
To determine the ATM strike, find the intersection of the
put and call linearly interpolated price curves. Select the strike
closest to the value of the intersection of the curves--this becomes
the ATM strike. If the intersection falls exactly in the middle of two
strikes, or if the whole segments overlap (i.e., when four neighboring
calls and puts have the same price), use the lower strike. In case of
more than one intersection point (in rare cases of highly irregular
market prices), use the one closest to the current value of SPY.
Use all listed puts below the ATM strike and all listed
calls above the ATM strike, and both the ATM call and put. When two
consecutive option prices of $0.05 or less are encountered when moving
away from the ATM, exclude all the strikes beyond that level, from each
of the put and call side.
A competing volatility index that uses the midpoint for its option
input prices uses a different exclusion rule, which similarly moves
away from the ATM, but excludes individual strikes if they have no bid,
and excludes all the strikes beyond two consecutive no bid strikes. A
comparison of a hypothetical list of put option inputs and the
resulting inclusion decision is given below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPIKES input
Strike \7\ SPIKES input included? Market VIX input VIX input included?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
201..................................... 0.06 Include....................... 0.05 x 0.07 0.06 Include.
200.5................................... 0.06 Include....................... 0.05 x 0.07 0.06 Include.
200..................................... 0.05 Include....................... 0.05 x 0.07 0.06 Include.
199.5................................... 0.04 Include....................... 0.04 x 0.06 0.05 Include.
199..................................... 0.05 Exclude....................... 0 x 0.11 0.055 Exclude.
198.5................................... 0.03 Exclude....................... 0.01 x 0.1 0.055 Include.
198..................................... 0.04 Exclude....................... 0.02 x 0.08 0.05 Include.
197.5................................... 0.03 Exclude....................... 0.01 x 0.07 0.04 Include.
197..................................... 0.04 Exclude....................... 0.01 x 0.06 0.035 Include.
196.5................................... 0.02 Exclude....................... 0 x 0.05 0.025 Exclude.
196..................................... 0.01 Exclude....................... 0.01 x 0.06 0.035 Include.
195.5................................... 0.01 Exclude....................... 0 x 0.05 0.025 Exclude.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the exclusion rule is to remove option inputs from
the calculation that could be deemed less reliable and thus potentially
negatively impact the calculation outcome. The Exchange believes that
its exclusion methodology is a material enhancement over existing
methodologies, and should result in a calculation outcome that better
reflects the expected measure of volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed previously, the price dragging method reduces the
variability of the option inputs. Since the option inputs have reduced
variability, and those values are used to determine which strikes make
it into the index calculation, the combination of price dragging and
exclusion rules work together to, in the Exchange's opinion, create a
more reliable Index value.
3. Weight the Options and Estimate Volatility
For each term, the volatility is estimated using the variance swap
approximation, with the selected options' prices weighted according to
the SPIKES formula:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JY18.015
Each eligible option's contribution is proportional to the change
in the strike (half the difference between the strike on either side of
the option) and the price, and inversely proportional to the square of
the option's strike. After calculating for each option, these are
summed and multiplied by two times the exponential of the risk free
rate times time-to-expiration. The next step is to subtract from this
value, the square of, the difference between the ATM call and put
prices, times the exponential of the risk free rate times time-to-
expiration, divided by the ATM strike. Lastly, divide the result by the
time to expiration to arrive at the final value.
4. Calculate the Index
Compute the 30-day weighted average of the near- and next-term
variances,
[[Page 32936]]
take the square root, and multiply by 100, as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JY18.016
t1 Time (in seconds) to near-term expiration
s1 Estimated volatility computed by variance swap
approximation, near-term
t2 Time (in seconds) to next-term expiration
s2 Estimated volatility computed by variance swap
approximation, next-term
tM Number of seconds in 30 days (30 x 86,400 = 2,592,000)
Background Information
SPY is the largest and most actively traded ETF in the U.S.\8\
According to State Street Global Advisor, the Trustee of SPY, as of May
14, 2018, the net assets under management in SPY was approximately $263
billion; the weighted average market capitalization of the portfolio
components was approximately $217 billion; the smallest market
capitalization was approximately $3.6 billion (Range Resources
Corporation, ticker: RRC), and the largest was approximately $930
billion (Apple, Inc., ticker: AAPL).\9\ For the three months ending
April 30, 2018, the average daily volume in SPY shares was 119 million,
and the average value of shares traded was approximately $31.8
billion.\10\ For the same period, the average daily volume in SPY
options was approximately 4.2 million contracts.\11\ The most recent
open interest in SPY options was approximately 23.9 million contracts
as of May 14, 2018.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ SPY holds the shares of up to 500 companies listed on U.S.
securities exchanges (SPY currently has 506 securities due to multi-
share classes for some companies).
\9\ See https://www.spdrs.com/product/fund.seam?ticker=SPY.
\10\ Calculated using data from Thompson Reuters as of May 14,
2018.
\11\ Calculated using data from The Options Clearing Corp. as of
May 14, 2018.
\12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that, in addition to the other unique and
proprietary attributes associated with the Index's calculation and
settlement methodology, as well as the Exchange's fully-electronic,
transparent, highly-deterministic trading system, using SPY options as
the components for a volatility index, in the manner proposed by the
Exchange, will offer a number of significant, distinct advantages over
other types of volatility indexes. The Exchange believes that the
advantages of using SPY options have the potential to result in an
extremely liquid volatility product with exceptionally tight spreads,
and consequently would not be readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts. First, SPY options are extremely liquid (they
regularly trade 4-5 million contracts a day, and have 20-30 million
contracts in open interest). Second, SPY options have consistently
tighter bid-ask spreads than SPX options, which are the components for
the Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') VIX index. Since SPY options are
traded on all 15 option exchanges, it allows market participants to
take advantage of arbitrage opportunities across multiple venues. This
is in contrast to SPX options which only trade on Cboe, and thus those
arbitrage opportunities across venues are not possible. Since SPY
options are traded on all 15 option exchanges, at the time of the final
settlement of the SPIKES Index on the Exchange,\13\ there will be up to
14 other options exchanges open for trading SPY options, thus serving
as real-time cross-reference prices for those SPY options included in
the Exchange's SPIKES Special Settlement Auction. This is in contrast
to SPX options during Cboe's VIX settlement auction, where there are no
real-time cross-reference prices for those SPX options included in
Cboe's VIX settlement, as SPX options are only traded on one exchange--
Cboe. In terms of spreads, SPY spreads are significantly tighter and
exhibit much higher consistency with a much narrower range of typical
values and far fewer numbers of outliers than SPX. For example, when
examining daily closing bid and ask prices of regular monthly options
(with time to expiry closest to 30 calendar days) from October 2007
(when SPY options started trading in penny increments) to May 2018, and
comparing the following three strike ranges: (A) 1% ATM--at-the-money
options within 1% (plus or minus) of the underlying forward price; (B)
1-5% OTM--out-of-the-money options (higher strikes for calls, lower
strikes for puts); and (C) 85-95% Puts--far out-of-the-money put
options typically included in volatility index calculations, SPY
spreads are consistently tighter than SPX spreads, both across strike
prices and through time, by a factor of 2 to 4 times (this is after
normalizing SPY spreads to SPX spreads, by multiplying SPY spreads by
10). Accordingly, the Exchange believes that these advantages of using
SPY options in the manner proposed by the Exchange, when combined with
the other features and attributes of the SPIKES Index, have the
potential to result in an extremely liquid volatility product with
exceptionally tight spreads, and consequently would not be readily
susceptible to fraudulent and manipulative acts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The final settlement of the SPIKES Index occurs during the
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction (defined and discussed below),
which commences immediately following the opening of trading on the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in Exhibit 3-1, the following are the characteristics
of the Index: (i) The initial index value was 13.05 on January 10,
2005; (ii) the index value on May 14, 2018 was 13.44; (iii) the lowest
index value since inception was 9.80 and occurred on July 20, 2007; and
(iv) the highest index value since inception was 81.85 and occurred on
November 20, 2008.
Index Calculation and Maintenance
As noted above, the Index will be maintained and calculated by the
Exchange. The level of the Index will reflect the current expected
volatility of SPY. The Index will be updated on a real-time basis on
each trading day beginning at 9:30 a.m. and ending at 4:15 p.m. (New
York time). If the current published value of a component is not
available, the last published value will be used in the calculation.
Values of the Index will be disseminated to the Options Price Reporting
Authority (``OPRA'') at least every 15 seconds during the Exchange's
regular trading hours, pursuant to Exchange Rules 1802 and 1803. The
Exchange is currently disseminating the cash values of the Index to
OPRA under the ticker symbol `SPIKE' in at least 15 second intervals.
In the event the Index ceases to be maintained or calculated, or its
values are not disseminated at least every 15 seconds by a widely
available source, the Exchange will not list any additional series for
trading, and may, for the purpose of maintaining a fair and orderly
market and protecting investors, limit transactions in certain options
on the Index to closing transactions only.
[[Page 32937]]
Exercise and Settlement Value
On the expiration date for expiring SPIKES options, the Exchange
will calculate the final settlement value of the Index for expiring
SPIKES options. The expiration date for expiring SPIKES options is the
same day that the final settlement value of the Index is calculated for
those options. This date is the Wednesday that is thirty days prior to
the third Friday of the calendar month immediately following the month
in which the applicable SPIKES options expire. If that Wednesday or the
Friday that is thirty days following that Wednesday is an Exchange
holiday, the final settlement value shall be calculated on the business
day immediately preceding that Wednesday. The exercise-settlement
amount is equal to the difference between the final settlement value of
the Index and the exercise price of the option, multiplied by $100.
Exercise will result in the delivery of cash on the business day
following expiration.
To determine the final settlement value of the Index, the Exchange
will perform an Index settlement price calculation which includes all
SPY options that expire 30 days after the SPIKES settlement that are
included in the settlement (these options are referred to in this rule
filing as the ``constituent options''). In order to perform the Index
settlement price calculation, each constituent option will be assigned
a Settlement Reference Price or ``SRP,'' defined and discussed in more
detail below. Each SRP will be determined through a new ``SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction,'' which will be conducted once per month,
in the constituent options traded on the Exchange, on final settlement
day. The SPIKES Special Settlement Auction will utilize the Exchange's
standard, existing Opening Process, as defined and fully-described in
Exchange Rule 503(f), with a new proposed modification to account for
situations where there remains an order imbalance \14\ that must be
filled at the opening price after the requisite number of iterations of
the imbalance process takes place under the Exchange's existing Opening
Process (the Exchange's existing Opening Process provides that the
Exchange can open with an imbalance after the requisite number of
iterations of the imbalance process takes place).\15\ This new proposed
modification to the Exchange's existing Opening Process to facilitate
the execution of this remaining must-fill interest is referred to as
the special settlement imbalance process (``SSIP''), which will be
governed by new proposed Interpretations and Policies .06 to Exchange
Rule 1809, as described more fully below. The Exchange believes that
using its fully-electronic and fully-transparent Opening Process
functionality, which is accessible to all Members of the Exchange for
participation, in highly liquid SPY options (which are simultaneously
opening and available for trading on up to 14 other exchanges, thus
providing real-time cross-reference prices for the SPY options included
in the settlement) to conduct the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction to
settle expiring SPIKES options, will offer significant advantages over
other types of volatility index auction processes, resulting in a
robust Opening Process that presents arbitrage opportunities across
multiple venues to drive prices into line and reach equilibrium, and
thus consequently would not be readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ An ``imbalance'' occurs when there is insufficient
liquidity to satisfy all trading interest due an execution at a
certain price. See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(v).
\15\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction
would not be readily susceptible to fraudulent and manipulative acts
for a number of reasons. As discussed more fully below, the Exchange's
existing Opening Process runs to completion and precedes the engagement
of the new SSIP. The existing Opening Process cannot occur prior to
9:30 a.m. Eastern Time and only begins following the dissemination of a
quote or trade in the market for the underlying security.\16\ Following
the dissemination of a quote or trade in the market for the underlying
security, the System will pause for a period of time no longer than one
half second to allow the marketplace to absorb this information.\17\
When there is an imbalance,\18\ the System will broadcast a System
Imbalance Message (which includes the symbol, side of the market,
quantity of matched contracts, the imbalance quantity, must fill
quantity (i.e., the number of contracts that must be filled in order
for that option to open on the Exchange at the indicated price),
quantity of routable contracts, and price of the affected series) to
subscribers of the Exchange's data feeds and begin an Imbalance Timer
\19\ not to exceed three seconds.\20\ Under the existing Opening
Process the Exchange may repeat this process up to three times.\21\
While the Exchange is conducting its Opening Process, all 14 other
option exchanges will also be conducting their opening process for SPY
options. As the Exchange works through its process to resolve
imbalances under the existing Opening Process, other Exchanges will be
open and will serve as real-time cross-reference prices for those SPY
options, enabling market participants to send orders to the Exchange if
there are pricing anomalies for these SPY options across venues. The
longer it takes the Exchange to work through the imbalance, the greater
the likelihood that other exchanges will have opened their SPY options
market and the natural pressures of a competitive market will help to
eliminate any pricing anomalies and aid in eliminating the imbalance on
the Exchange. Further, the Exchange's imbalance process is transparent,
as every subscriber to the Exchange's data feed receives the imbalance
messages, and every Member of the Exchange can participate in the
imbalance process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Exchange Rule 503(e)(1).
\17\ The Exchange notes that the current setting is one half
second.
\18\ See supra note 14.
\19\ The Exchange notes that the current Imbalance Timer setting
is one second.
\20\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii).
\21\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As previously discussed, on the day the settlement value for the
Index is calculated, the Exchange will conduct the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction, using its standard, existing Opening Process for
all options on the Exchange, including the constituent options.\22\ The
following paragraphs provide a high level overview of the Exchange's
standard, existing Opening Process, in order to illustrate the complete
operation of the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ For a complete description of the Exchange's standard,
existing Opening Process, refer to Exchange Rule 503, Openings on
the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the standard, existing Opening Process, if there are no
quotes or orders that lock or cross each other, the System \23\ will
open by disseminating the Exchange's best bid and offer among quotes
and orders that exist in the System at that time. If there are quotes
or orders that lock each other, the System will calculate an Expanded
Quote Range (``EQR''), as described in Rule 503(f)(2). The EQR
represents the limits of the range in which transactions may occur
during the Opening Process.\24\ The EQR is recalculated any
[[Page 32938]]
time a route timer or Imbalance Timer expires if material conditions of
the market (imbalance size, ABBO \25\ price and size, liquidity price
or size, etc.) have changed during the timer. Once calculated, the EQR
represents the limits of the range in which transactions may occur
during the Opening Process.\26\ The System uses the EQR to determine
the highest and lowest price of the opening price range.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
\24\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(i). See also Exchange
Regulatory Circular 2012-02, which sets forth the tables that
describe the calculation of the EQR for option classes traded on the
Exchange, at https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/circular-files/MIAX_Opening_Process_and_Pause_Timer.pdf.
\25\ The term ``ABBO'' or ``Away Best Bid or Offer'' means the
best bid(s) or offer(s) disseminated by other Eligible Exchanges
(defined in Rule 1400(f)) and calculated by the Exchange based on
market information received by the Exchange from OPRA. See Exchange
Rule 100.
\26\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To calculate the opening price, the System takes into consideration
all valid Exchange quotes and all valid orders, together with other
exchanges' markets for the series, and identifies the price at which
the maximum number of contracts can trade. If that price is within the
EQR and leaves no imbalance, the Exchange will open at that price,
executing marketable trading interest as long as the opening price
includes only Exchange interest.\27\ If the calculated opening price
included interest other than solely Exchange interest, the System will
broadcast a system imbalance message (which includes the symbol, side
of the market, quantity of matched contracts, the imbalance quantity,
must fill quantity, quantity of routable contracts, and price of the
affected series) to Exchange Members \28\ and initiate a ``route
timer,'' not to exceed one second.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(iv).
\28\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\29\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(iv)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If all opening and marketable interest cannot be completely
executed at or within the EQR without trading at a price inferior to
the ABBO, or cannot trade at or within the quality opening market range
in the absence of a valid width NBBO,\30\ the System will automatically
institute an imbalance process.\31\ The System will broadcast a system
imbalance message (which includes the symbol, side of the market,
quantity of matched contracts, the imbalance quantity, must fill
quantity, quantity of routable contracts, and price of the affected
series) to subscribers of the Exchange's data feeds, and begin an
Imbalance Timer, not to exceed three seconds.\32\ Market Makers \33\
may enter Opening Only (``OPG'') eQuotes,\34\ Auction or Cancel
(``AOC'') eQuotes,\35\ Standard quotes,\36\ Opening Orders (``OPG
Orders''),\37\ AOC Orders \38\ and limit orders during the Imbalance
Timer. Other Exchange Members may enter OPG Orders, AOC Orders and
other order types (except those order types not valid during the
Opening Process, as described in Rule 516) during the Imbalance
Timer.\39\ If, at the conclusion of the timer, quotes and orders
submitted during the Imbalance Timer, or other changes to the ABBO,
would not allow the entire imbalance amount to trade at the Exchange at
or within the EQR without trading at a price inferior to the ABBO, the
System will send a new system imbalance message to Exchange Members and
initiate a route timer for routable Public Customer orders not to
exceed one second. If, during the route timer, interest is received by
the System which would allow all interest to trade on the System (i.e.,
there is no longer an imbalance) at the opening price without trading
at a price inferior to other markets, the System will trade and the
route timer will end.\40\ The System may repeat the imbalance process
up to three times (as established by the Exchange).\41\ Following
completion of the third imbalance process, if there is an opening
transaction, any unexecuted contracts from the imbalance not traded or
routed will be cancelled back to the entering Member if the price for
those contracts crosses the opening price, in effect cancelling that
must fill interest.\42\ That is the completion of the Exchange's
standard, existing Opening Process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ The term ``NBBO'' means the national best bid or offer as
calculated by the Exchange based on market information received by
the Exchange from OPRA. See Exchange Rule 100.
\31\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii).
\32\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(A).
\33\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Lead Market
Makers'', ``Primary Lead Market Makers'' and ``Registered Market
Makers'' collectively. See Exchange Rule 100.
\34\ An opening only or ``OPG'' eQuote is a quote that can be
submitted by a Market Maker only during the Opening as set forth in
Rule 503. OPG eQuotes will automatically expire at the end of the
Opening Process. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2)(iii).
\35\ An Auction or Cancel or ``AOC'' eQuote is a quote submitted
by a Market Maker to provide liquidity in a specific Exchange
process with a time in force that corresponds with the duration of
that event and will automatically expire at the end of that event.
See Exchange Rule 517(a)(2)(ii).
\36\ A Standard quote is a quote submitted by a Market Maker
that cancels and replaces the Market Maker's previous Standard
quote, if any. See Exchange Rule 517(a)(1).
\37\ An Opening or ``OPG'' Order is an order that is valid only
for the opening process. See Exchange Rule 516(h).
\38\ An Auction-or-Cancel or ``AOC'' order is a limit order used
to provide liquidity during a specific Exchange process with a time
in force that corresponds with that event. See Exchange Rule
516(b)(4).
\39\ See supra note 22.
\40\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(2).
\41\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
\42\ See Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, where an imbalance exists in constituent options and the final
imbalance process has been conducted as part of the Exchange's
standard, existing Opening Process, instead of cancelling that must
fill interest back to the entering Member, the Exchange is proposing to
conduct the SSIP,\43\ where the Exchange will satisfy that must fill
interest. The Exchange does not want to cancel any must fill interest,
as this liquidity could represent previously hedged interest that must
be unwound.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See proposed Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(5)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SSIP is employed to satisfy all liquidity identified as must
fill which is creating the imbalance, referred to as the must fill
imbalance. The SSIP is an iterative process that is designed to
determine a price at which all must fill imbalance interest can be
satisfied.\44\ In the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction, in addition to
any order types that may be regularly accepted by the Exchange, the
Exchange will also accept settlement auction only orders (``SAO
Orders'') and settlement auction only eQuotes (``SAO eQuotes'') (SAO
Orders and SAO eQuotes are collectively referred to as ``SAOs'') at any
time after the opening of the Live Order Window (``LOW'') \45\ and the
Live Quote Window (``LQW''),\46\ respectively. SAOs are specific order
types that allow a Member to voluntarily tag such order as a SPIKES
strategy order, defined below. All orders for participation in the
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction that are related to positions in, or
a trading strategy involving, SPIKES Index options (``SPIKES strategy
orders''), and any change to or cancellation of any such order: (i)
Must be received prior to the applicable SPIKES strategy order cut-off
time for the constituent option series, as determined by the Exchange,
which may be no earlier than the opening of the LOQ or the LQW, and no
later than the opening of trading in the series. The Exchange will
announce all determinations regarding changes to the applicable SPIKES
strategy order cut-off time via Regulatory Circular at least one day
prior to implementation (however the Exchange anticipates initially
establishing the cut-off time at 9:20 a.m.
[[Page 32939]]
Eastern); and (ii) may not be cancelled or modified after the
applicable SPIKES strategy order cut-off time, unless the SPIKES
strategy order is not executed in the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction
and the cancellation or modification is submitted after the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction is concluded (provided that any such SPIKES
strategy order may be modified or cancelled after the applicable SPIKES
strategy order cut-off time and prior to the applicable non-SPIKES
strategy order cut-off time in order to correct a legitimate error, in
which case the Member submitting the change or cancellation will
prepare and maintain a memorandum setting forth the circumstances that
resulted in the change or cancellation and will file a copy of the
memorandum with the Exchange no later than the next business day in a
form and manner prescribed by the Exchange). In general, the Exchange
will consider orders to be SPIKES strategy orders for purposes of Rule
1809 Interpretation and Policy .06, if the orders possess the following
three characteristics: (A) Are for options with the expiration that
will be used to calculate the exercise or final settlement value of the
applicable volatility index option contract; (B) are for options
spanning the full range of strike prices for the appropriate expiration
for options that will be used to calculate the exercise or final
settlement value of the applicable volatility index option contract,
but not necessarily every available strike price; and (C) are for put
options with strike prices less than the ``at-the-money'' strike price
and for call options with strike prices greater than the ``at-the-
money'' strike price. They may also be for put and call options with
``at-the-money'' strike prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See proposed Exchange Rule 1809, Interpretations and
Policies .06.
\45\ The Exchange notes that the current Live Order Window opens
at 7:30 a.m.
\46\ The Exchange notes that the current Live Quote Window
setting opens at 9:25 a.m., however the Exchange plans to open the
Live Quote Window for the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction at 8:30
a.m.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whether certain orders are SPIKES strategy orders for purposes of
Interpretation and Policy .06 depends upon specific facts and
circumstances. The Exchange may also deem order types other than those
provided above as SPIKES strategy orders if the Exchange determines
that to be the case based upon the applicable facts and circumstances.
These requirements are substantially similar to Cboe's requirements
for ``strategy orders'' participating in the VIX settlement
auction.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See Cboe Rule 6.2, Hybrid Opening (and Sometimes Closing)
System (``HOSS''), Interpretations and Policies .01, Modified
Opening Procedure for Series Used to Calculate the Exercise/Final
Settlement Values of Volatility Indexes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange anticipates that market participants that actively
trade SPIKES options may hedge their positions with SPY option series
that will also be used to calculate the SPIKES exercise settlement/
final settlement value. Market participants holding hedged SPIKES
options positions may trade out of their SPY option series on the
relevant SPIKES expiration/final settlement date. Specifically, market
participants holding short, hedged SPIKES options could liquidate that
hedge by selling their SPY options series, while traders holding long,
hedged SPIKES options could liquidate their hedge by buying SPY option
series. In order to seek convergence with the SPIKE exercise/final
settlement value, these market participants may liquidate their hedges
by submitting SPIKES strategy orders in the appropriate SPY option
series during the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction on the SPIKES
expiration/final settlement date.
The SPIKES strategy order cut-off time exists because trades to
liquidate hedges can contribute to an order imbalance during the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction in SPY option series on expiration/final
settlement dates. For example, traders liquidating hedges could
predominantly be on one side of the market and those market
participants' orders may create buy or sell order imbalances during the
SPIKES Special Settlement Auction in SPY option series on expiration/
final settlement dates. As a result of having a SPIKES strategy order
cut-off time in place, the Exchange has created a defined window to
encourage participation in the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction among
market participants who may wish to place off-setting orders against
imbalances to which SPIKES strategy orders may have contributed.
Additionally, by precluding the modification or cancellation of SPIKES
strategy orders from occurring after the cut-off time, the Exchange is
ensuring that the order book reflects bona-fide interest for execution,
and is a feature designed to prevent manipulation of the final
settlement price.
Following is a description of the proposed operation of the SSIP
portion of the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction, as set forth in
Exchange Rule 1809, proposed Interpretations and Policies .06. To begin
the SSIP, the System will broadcast a system imbalance message to all
subscribers of the Exchange's relevant data feed and begin an SSIP
Imbalance Timer, the duration of which is to be determined by the
Exchange, not to exceed ten seconds, and communicated via Regulatory
Circular. During the SSIP Imbalance Timer, the System accepts all quote
and order types supported during the standard Opening Process. Next,
the System will evaluate the must fill imbalance and adjust the EQR by
a defined amount by appending to the EQR (adding to offers or
subtracting from bids) the EQR value (as previously determined by the
Exchange and communicated via Regulatory Circular). During the SSIP,
the allowable EQR will be increased .5 times the EQR value upon each
iteration of the SSIP. The SSIP will be repeated until a price is
reached at which there is no remaining must fill imbalance.
An example of a SPIKES Special Settlement Auction (which utilizes
the Exchange's standard, existing Opening Process, as modified by the
SSIP), for a constituent option is provided to illustrate the process.
Example
SPY Mar 280 Call--constituent option
The Exchange market for the constituent option is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bid size Bid Offer Offer size
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLMM........................................................ 100 1.01 1.10 100
MM1......................................................... 50 1.02 1.10 50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange receives an SAO Order to purchase 500 SPY March 280
contracts with a ``market'' price. Accordingly, there are 150 contracts
offered at $1.10 and a market order \48\ to buy 500 contracts. This
results in the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ A market order is an order to buy or sell a stated number
of option contracts at the best price available at the time of
execution. See Exchange Rule 516(a).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imbalance Quantity......................................... 350
Must Fill Imbalance Quantity............................... 350
Matched Quantity........................................... 150
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32940]]
The Exchange's standard Opening Process is used, and because an
imbalance exists, the Exchange's Standard Opening Imbalance Process (as
defined in Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)) commences. The EQR is expanded by the
EQR value of $0.10,\49\ becoming $1.02 x $1.20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ The EQR value for options bid $0.00 to $1.00 is $0.05;
$1.01 to $2.00 is $0.10; $3.01 to $5.00 is $0.20; $5.01 to $10.00 is
$0.30; $10.01 to $20.00 is $0.50; $20.01 to $40.00 is $0.70; and
$40.01 and above is $0.90. See also supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After three iterations of the Exchange's Standard Opening Imbalance
Process,\50\ if the must fill imbalance quantity has not been
satisfied, the new SSIP will be employed. (For purposes of this
example, assume that all such three iterations have completed and the
must fill imbalance quantity still has not been satisfied.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ The System may repeat the Standard Opening Imbalance
Process up to three times (as established by the Exchange). See
Exchange Rule 503(f)(2)(vii)(B)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SSIP will begin by using an EQR expanded by 1.0 times the EQR
value ($0.10). Therefore, the EQR for the first iteration of SSIP is
$1.02 x $1.20.
Since no responses have yet been received, a system imbalance
message is broadcast to all subscribers of the Exchange's data feeds
and the SSIP auction period is started: The following responses are
received:
@20 Milliseconds BD1 response, AOC Order to sell 200 @$1.20
arrives
At the end of the SSIP auction period, the System evaluates the
orders and responses to determine if the must fill imbalance quantity
can be satisfied at, or within, the EQR.
The Exchange market for the constituent option is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bid size Bid Offer Offer size
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLMM........................................................ 100 1.01 1.10 100
MM1......................................................... 50 1.02 1.10 50
BD1......................................................... ........... ........... 1.20 200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The offer of 150 contracts at $1.10 remains and there are now an
additional 200 contracts offered at $1.20. This results in the
following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imbalance Quantity......................................... 150
Must Fill Imbalance Quantity............................... 150
Matched Quantity........................................... 350
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A must fill imbalance quantity of 150 contracts priced through the
EQR remains, as there are a total of 350 contracts offered and a buy
order for 500 at the market.
Because an imbalance still exists, a second iteration of the SSIP
will begin by expanding the side of the EQR opposite the must fill
imbalance quantity quote range, from the original EQR value to the
quote range plus 1.5 times the original EQR value ($0.10), becoming
$1.25 ($1.10 + $0.15).
A new system imbalance message is broadcast to all subscribers of
the Exchange's data feeds and a second SSIP auction period is started:
The following responses are received:
@500 milliseconds MM2 response, AOC eQuote to sell 1000 @
$1.23 arrives
At the end of the SSIP auction period, the System evaluates the
orders and responses to see if the must fill imbalance quantity can be
satisfied at, or within, the EQR.
The Exchange market for the constituent option is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bid size Bid Offer Offer size
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLMM........................................................ 100 1.01 1.10 100
MM1......................................................... 50 1.02 1.10 50
BD1......................................................... ........... ........... 1.20 200
MM2......................................................... ........... ........... 1.23 1000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The offer of 150 contracts at $1.10 remains, as well as the 200
contracts offered at $1.20. In addition, there is now an offer to sell
1,000 contracts at $1.23.
In this case, the entire must fill imbalance quantity can be
satisfied at $1.23. The SAO Order to purchase 500 contracts at the
market price is filled in the following fashion:
The SAO Order buys 100 from the PLMM @$1.23
The SAO Order buys 50 from MM1 @$1.23
The SAO Order buys 200 from BD1 @$1.23
The SAO Order buys 150 from MM2 @$1.23
Once there is no remaining must fill imbalance, SAOs, AOC Orders,
AOC eQuotes, OPG Orders, and OPG eQuotes submitted into the SPIKES
Special Settlement Auction are cancelled. Any unfilled day limit orders
and GTC orders that are priced at the Opening Price are placed on the
Book and managed by the System.
As previously discussed, the System will assign an SRP to each
constituent option to facilitate the calculation of the final
settlement price of the Index. If the System opens the constituent
option with a trade, the System assigns the constituent option an SRP
equal to the trade price in that option. If there is no locking or
crossing interest and the System opens the constituent option without a
trade, and the bid-ask spread is at or within a range as defined by the
Exchange in an SRP opening width table and communicated via Regulatory
Circular, the System assigns the constituent option an SRP equal to the
midpoint of the bid and ask prices. If the bid-ask spread is not within
a range as defined in the SRP opening width table, the System will
conduct an additional process to determine the SRP of the constituent
option, as follows.
First, the System will start a settlement reference price timer
(``SRPT'') (the duration of which will be defined by the Exchange not
to exceed sixty seconds and communicated via Regulatory Circular). If,
during the SRPT, there is a trade on the Exchange, the System will set
the SRP equal to the trade price. If, during the SRPT, the bid-ask
spread changes so that it is within a range defined in the settlement
price opening width table, the System will set the SRP equal to the
midpoint of the bid and ask price.
[[Page 32941]]
If the SRPT expires, the System will set the SRP equal to the
Reference Price (the current price of that option utilizing the cash
index calculation formula, described above) of the constituent option
if it is equal to or inside the MBBO.\51\ If the Reference Price is
non-zero and less than the Exchange's bid, then the System will set the
SRP equal to the Exchange's bid. If the Reference Price is non-zero and
greater than the Exchange's ask, then the System will set the SRP equal
to the Exchange's ask. If the Reference Price is zero and if one or
both adjacent constituent options have a non-zero SRP, the constituent
option will be excluded from the calculation. If the Reference Price is
zero and there are multiple adjacent constituent options with a current
Reference Price of zero, the System will use the midpoint of the NBBO
for the SRP if the NBBO bid-ask spread is at or within a range defined
in the settlement price opening width table. If the NBBO bid-ask spread
is not within a range defined in the settlement price opening width
table, the System will wait for either a trade, or a bid-ask spread
that is within a range defined in the settlement price opening width
table. Once all constituent options have been assigned an SRP, the
System will perform the final settlement price calculation of the
Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ The term ``MBBO'' means the best bid or offer on the
Exchange. See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this fully-electronic and fully-
transparent SPIKES Special Settlement Auction process, which is
accessible to all Members of the Exchange for participation, in highly
liquid SPY options (which are simultaneously opening and available for
trading on 14 other exchanges, thus providing real-time cross-reference
prices for the SPY options included in the settlement) to settle
expiring SPIKES options, offers significant advantages over other types
of volatility auction processes, and will result in a robust opening
process that presents arbitrage opportunities across multiple venues to
drive prices into line and reach equilibrium, and thus would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and manipulative acts.
Contract Specifications
The contract specifications for options on the Index are set forth
in Exhibit 3-2. The Index is a broad-based index, as defined in MIAX
Options Rule 1801(k), for the purpose of determining which of the
Exchange's rules apply to options on the Index.\52\ Options on the
Index are European-style and cash-settled. Standard trading hours for
index options (9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., New York time) will apply to the
Index.\53\ The Exchange proposes to apply margin requirements for the
purchase and sale of options on the Index that are identical to those
applied for other broad-based index options traded on other options
exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ The proposed rule change relates solely to the Exchange's
request to list and trade options on the Index and does not
represent a request for the Commission to determine whether the
Index is a ``narrow-based index'' as that term is defined under the
Act. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(55)(B).
\53\ See Exchange Rule 1808.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The trading of options on the Index will be subject to the trading
halt procedures applicable to index options traded on the Exchange.\54\
Options on the Index will be quoted and traded in U.S. dollars.\55\
Accordingly, all Exchange and Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
members shall be able to accommodate trading, clearance and settlement
of the Index without alteration. Furthermore, the Exchange believes
that OCC will be able to accommodate trading, clearance and settlement
of options on the Index without having to obtain any additional
approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ See Exchange Rule 1808(c).
\55\ See Exchange Rule 1809(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes that the minimum trading increments for
options on the Index shall be $0.05 for series trading below $3, and
$0.10 for series trading at or above $3. This is the same pricing
convention utilized by Cboe for VIX options. Accordingly, the Exchange
is proposing to amend Exchange Rule 404, Series of Option Contracts
Open for Trading, by adopting new Interpretations and Policies .11 to
specify the minimum trading increments for options on the Index.
The Exchange proposes that there shall be no position or exercise
limits for options on the Index. As noted above, the Index will settle
using published prices and quotes from its corresponding SPY options.
Because the size of SPY options market (as well as the underlying SPY
market) is so large, the Exchange believes that there is minimal risk
of manipulation by virtue of position size in SPIKES options. The
Exchange notes that options on Cboe's VIX are also not subject to any
position or exercise limits.\56\ Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing
to amend Exchange Rule 1804(a) to specify that there will be no
position limits and no exercise limits for options on the SPIKES Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No.54019 (June 20,
2006), 71 FR 36569 (June 27, 2006) (SR-CBOE-2006-55). Additionally,
the Exchange notes there are currently a number of actively-traded
broad-based index options, i.e., DJX, NDX, SPX, that are also not
subject to any position or exercise limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange initially proposes to list options on the Index in up
to twelve (12) standard monthly expirations. This is the same number of
monthly expirations that are permitted for VIX options, pursuant to
Cboe Rule 24.9(a).\57\ Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to amend
Exchange Rule 1809(a)(3) to permit the listing of up to twelve (12)
standard monthly expirations for SPIKES options. The Exchange is also
proposing to make changes to Exchange Rule 1809(a)(3), in order to
conform the structure of such rule to Cboe's Rule 24.9(a), to allow for
the listing of short-term options and quarterly options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ Cboe Rule 24.9 also permits for the listing of up to six
weekly VIX expirations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to set the minimum strike price interval for
options on the Index at $0.50 where the strike price is less than $15,
$1 or greater where the strike price is between $15 and $200, and $5 or
greater where the strike price is greater than $200. The Exchange
believes that $0.50 and $1 strike price intervals will provide
investors with greater flexibility by allowing them to establish
positions that are better tailored to meet their investment objectives.
Further, as proposed, when new series of options on the Index with a
new expiration date are opened for trading, or when additional series
of options on the Index in an existing expiration date are opened for
trading as the current value of the Index moves substantially from the
exercise prices of series already opened, the exercise prices of such
new or additional series shall be reasonably related to the current
value of the Index at the time such series are first opened for
trading.\58\ The Exchange, however, proposes to eliminate this range
limitation that will limit the number of $1 strikes that may be listed
in options on the Index. The Exchange's proposal to set minimum strike
price intervals without a range limitation is identical to strike price
intervals adopted by Cboe for the VIX.\59\ Accordingly, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Exchange Rule 1809(c), Procedures for Adding and
Deleting Strike Prices, to adopt new sub-section (5) to specify the
[[Page 32942]]
minimum strike price intervals for options on the Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ See Exchange Rule 1809(c)(3). The term ``reasonably related
to the current index value of the underlying index'' means that the
exercise price is within thirty percent (30%) of the current index
value, as defined in MIAX Options 1809(c)(4).
\59\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63155 (October 21,
2010), 75 FR 66402 (October 28, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2010-096).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The trading of options on the Index shall be subject to the same
rules that presently govern the trading of Exchange index options,
including sales practice rules, margin requirements, and trading rules.
In addition, long-term option series having up to sixty months to
expiration may be traded.\60\ The trading of long-term options on the
Index shall also be subject to the same rules that govern the trading
of all the Exchange's index options, including sales practice rules,
margin requirements, and trading rules. Further, pursuant to
Interpretations and Policies .01 of MIAX Options Rule 1809, the
Exchange may also list Short Term Option Series and pursuant to
Interpretations and Policies .02 of MIAX Options Rule 1809, the
Exchange may also list Quarterly Options Series, respectively, on the
Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ See Exchange Rule 1809(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter XIII of the Exchange's rules is designed to protect public
customer trading and shall apply to trading in options on the Index.
Specifically, paragraphs (a) and (b) of MIAX Options Rule 1307 prohibit
Members from accepting a customer order to purchase or write an option,
including options on the Index, unless such customer's account has been
approved in writing by a designated Options Principal of the Member.
Additionally, MIAX Options Rule 1309 regarding suitability is designed
to ensure that options, including options on the Index, are only sold
to customers capable of evaluating and bearing the risks associated
with trading in this instrument. Further, MIAX Options Rule 1310
permits Members to exercise discretionary power with respect to trading
options, including options on the Index, in a customer's account only
if the Member has received prior written authorization from the
customer and the account had been accepted in writing by a designated
Options Principal. MIAX Options Rule 1310 also requires designated
Options Principals or Representatives of a Member to approve and
initial each discretionary order, including discretionary orders for
options on the Index, on the day the discretionary order is entered.
Finally, MIAX Options Rule 1308, Supervision of Accounts, MIAX Options
Rule 1311, Confirmation to Customers, and MIAX Options Rule 1315,
Delivery of Current Options Disclosure Documents and Prospectus, will
also apply to trading in options on the Index.
Surveillance and Capacity
The Exchange has an adequate surveillance program in place for
options traded on the Index and intends to apply those same program
procedures that it applies to the Exchange's other options products. In
addition, several new surveillances related to the Index will be added
to the MIAX surveillance program. The Exchange has a Regulatory
Services Agreement (``RSA'') in place with the Financial Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA'') to conduct cross-market surveillances on its
behalf and has expanded the RSA to include a new options pattern: Index
Expiration for Cash Settled, A.M.-Settled, Index Options. The purpose
of this pattern is to determine whether any market participants
influenced the settlement price of an a.m. cash-settled index product
to benefit their expiring index option position.
In addition to the Index Expiration for Cash Settled report
mentioned above, both MIAX Option Regulation and FINRA Options
Regulation will manually review options activity during each monthly
settlement process. After manually reviewing settlement process
activity over the course of months, MIAX Options and FINRA will
determine whether additional reports or enhancements to the cash
settled report(s) are required.
Further, the Exchange's regulatory department conducts routine
surveillance in dozens of discrete areas. Index products and their
respective symbols are integrated into the Exchange's existing
surveillance system architecture and are thus subject to the relevant
surveillance processes. This is true for both surveillance system
processing and manual processes that support the Exchange's
surveillance program. Additionally, the Exchange is also a member of
the Intermarket Surveillance Group (ISG) under the Intermarket
Surveillance Group Agreement, dated June 20, 1994. The members of the
ISG include all of the U.S. registered stock and options markets.\61\
The members of ISG work together to coordinate surveillance and
investigative information sharing in the stock and options markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ For the current list of members of the ISG, see https://www.isgportal.org/isgPortal/public/members.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange represents that it has the necessary System capacity
to support additional quotations and messages that will result from the
listing and trading of options on the Index.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of the Act,\62\ in general and with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\63\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
\63\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change will permit options trading in the Index
pursuant to rules designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices and promote just and equitable principles of trade. In
particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will further
the Exchange's goal of introducing new and innovative products to the
marketplace. The Exchange believes that listing options on the Index
will provide an opportunity for investors to hedge, or speculate on,
the market risk associated with changes in volatility.
The Exchange believes that the enhanced features to the Index may
serve to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that its price dragging technique
and truncation rule, in combination with the immense liquidity of the
underlying options, make the Index less susceptible to market
manipulation. The price dragging technique, which is used to determine
the ongoing Reference Price for each individual option used in the
calculation of the Index, helps prevent market manipulation by
utilizing the most recent trade price as the Reference Price. The
Exchange believes that this feature may be a more accurate methodology
than only using the mid-point of the bid and ask, which is the
methodology utilized by a competing volatility index. The Exchange
believes the price dragging technique may create a more accurate and
stable index value which better represents volatility in the market by
emphasizing the actual trade price versus simply the mid-point spread.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the enhanced feature may
provide
[[Page 32943]]
greater consistency in the marketplace because the price dragging
technique results in a Reference Price that is supported by the fair
market value at the time versus using the mid-point, which is not
necessarily an accurate representation of the fair market value at the
time.
Furthermore, the truncation method, another key enhancement in the
Index, determines how far away from the money to exclude strikes from
the volatility calculation. This helps to ensure that values are not
being included that would skew the resulting Index value by taking into
account OTM options which are too far away to be accurately priced into
the Index value calculation. By excluding these options from the
calculation, the Exchange believes it is able to provide a more
reliable Index value. The Exchange believes that its exclusion
methodology is a material enhancement over existing methodologies, and
should result in a calculation outcome that better reflects the
expected measure of volatility.
As discussed previously, the price dragging method reduces the
variability of the option inputs (which also referred to herein as the
Reference Prices). Since the option inputs have reduced variability,
and those values are used to determine which strikes make it into the
Index's calculation, the combination of price dragging and exclusion
rules work together to, in the Exchange's opinion, create a more
reliable Index value. The Exchange believes that a more reliable Index
value will benefit investors and market participants trading options on
the Index, will promote just and equitable principles of trade, and
should serve to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.
The Exchange believes that, in addition to the other unique and
proprietary attributes associated with the Index's calculation and
settlement methodology, as well as the Exchange's fully-electronic,
transparent, highly-deterministic trading system, using SPY options as
the components for a volatility index, in the manner proposed by the
Exchange, will offer a number of significant, distinct advantages over
other types of volatility indexes. The Exchange believes that the
advantages of using SPY options have the potential to result in an
extremely liquid volatility product with exceptionally tight spreads,
and consequently would not be readily susceptible to fraudulent and
manipulative acts. First, SPY options are extremely liquid (they
regularly trade 4-5 million contracts a day, and have 20-30 million
contracts in open interest). Second, SPY options have consistently
tighter bid-ask spreads than SPX options, which are the components for
Cboe's VIX index. Since SPY options are traded on all 15 option
exchanges, it allows market participants to take advantage of arbitrage
opportunities across multiple venues. This is in contrast to SPX
options which only trade on Cboe, and thus those arbitrage
opportunities across venues are not possible. Also, at the time of
final settlement, there are 14 other options exchanges on which SPY
options are traded, and may serve as real-time cross-reference prices
for SPY options during the Exchange's SPIKES Special Settlement
Auction. This is in contrast to SPX options during Cboe's VIX
settlement auction, where there is no such reference market for SPX
options open during the time of the VIX settlement, as SPX options are
only traded on one exchange--Cboe. In terms of spreads, SPY spreads are
significantly tighter and exhibit much higher consistency with a much
narrower range of typical values and far fewer numbers of outliers than
SPX. SPY spreads are consistently tighter than SPX spreads, both across
strike prices and through time, by a factor of 2 to 4 times (this is
after normalizing SPY spreads to SPX spreads, by multiplying SPY
spreads by 10). Accordingly, the Exchange believes that these
advantages of using SPY options in the manner proposed by the Exchange,
when combined with the other features and attributes of the SPIKES
Index, have the potential to result in an extremely liquid volatility
product with exceptionally tight spreads, and consequently would not be
readily susceptible to fraudulent and manipulative acts.
The Exchange is currently disseminating the cash values of the
Index to OPRA under the ticker symbol `SPIKE' in at least 15 second
intervals. The Exchange believes that disseminating updates in at least
15 second intervals will benefit investors and other market
participants, as they will be better able to track the current value of
the Index at any given period of time, will promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and should prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices.
The Exchange believes that using its fully-electronic and fully-
transparent Opening Process functionality, which is accessible to all
Members of the Exchange for participation, in highly liquid SPY options
(which are simultaneously opening and available for trading on 14 other
exchanges, thus providing real-time cross-reference prices for the SPY
options included in the settlement) to conduct the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction to settle expiring SPIKES options, will offer
significant advantages over other types of volatility auction
processes, resulting in a robust opening process that presents
arbitrage opportunities across multiple venues to drive prices into
line and reach equilibrium, and thus benefiting investors and other
market participants, promoting just and equitable principles of trade,
and should prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.
The Exchange believes that having a SPIKES strategy order
modification and cancellation cut-off time during the SPIKES Special
Settlement Auction in SPY option series on expiration/final settlement
date will help to ensure that the order book reflects bona-fide
interest for execution, and is a feature designed to prevent
manipulation of the final settlement price.
Volatility-focused products have become more prominent over the
past several years, and in a number of different formats and types,
including ETFs, exchange-traded notes, exchange-traded options, and
exchange-traded futures. Such products offer investors the opportunity
to manage their volatility risks associated with an underlying asset
class. Currently, most of the products focus on underlying equity
indexes or equity-based portfolios.
The Exchange proposes to introduce a cash-settled options contract
on a new volatility index, which focuses on equity exposure using
options on SPY. SPY is the largest and most liquid ETF in the United
Sates, and the most actively traded equity option product. The Exchange
believes that because the Index is derived from published SPY options
prices, and given the immense liquidity found in the individual
portfolio components of SPY, the concern that the Index will be subject
to market manipulation is greatly reduced. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change to list options on the Index is
appropriate.
The Exchange further notes that Exchange Rules that apply to the
trading of other index options currently traded on the Exchange would
also apply to the trading of options on the Index. Additionally, the
trading of options on the Index would be subject to, among others,
Exchange Rules governing margin requirements and trading halt
procedures.
Finally, the Exchange represents that it has an adequate
surveillance program in place to detect manipulative trading in options
on the Index. The Exchange also represents that it has the necessary
systems capacity to support the new options series. Additionally, as
stated in
[[Page 32944]]
the filing, the Exchange has rules in place designed to protect public
customer trading.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. . The Exchange notes that the
proposed rule change will facilitate the listing and trading of a novel
index option product that will enhance competition among market
participants, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Among other things, the Exchange
believes that the use of SPY options in the manner proposed by the
Exchange, when combined with the other features and attributes of the
SPIKES Index, has the potential to result in an extremely liquid
volatility product with exceptionally tight spreads, and consequently
would not be readily susceptible to fraudulent and manipulative acts.
In particular, the Commission seeks comment on the following:
Do commenters agree with this overall assertion by the
Exchange?
Do commenters believe any proposed features (e.g.,
inclusion of relatively illiquid OTM (Out-of-the-Money) put SPY options
in SPIKES settlement, SPIKES settlement via a short pre-open auction of
SPY options, cash-settlement) of the SPIKES settlement could make
options on SPIKES susceptible to manipulation? Why or why not?
Do commenters believe the definition of ``SPIKES strategy
orders'' is sufficiently clear? Why or why not?
Do commenters believe the proposed SPIKES strategy order
cut-off time is adequate to provide sufficient time to work off order
imbalances during the SPIKES Special Settlement Auction in SPY option
series on final settlement dates? Why or why not?
Do commenters believe precluding the submission,
modification, or cancellation of SPIKES strategy orders after the
proposed cut-off time will be effective in reducing the likelihood of
manipulation in the calculation of the final settlement value for the
SPIKES Index? Why or why not?
Do commenters believe the proposed exclusion rule/
truncation method, which is designed to remove SPY option price inputs
deemed less reliable in order to avoid a potential negative impact on
the SPIKES calculation outcome, will be effective in reducing the
likelihood of manipulation in the calculation of the final settlement
value for the SPIKES Index? Why or why not?
The Exchange discusses the price dragging technique used
for intraday calculation of the SPIKES Index value to determine the
Reference Price for each of the individual SPY options used in the
calculation of the Index value. Do commenters believe that the price
dragging technique would improve Index stability by smoothing out
options price inputs into the Index calculation, especially as SPY
options quotes are rapidly changing? Do commenters agree that the price
dragging technique will result in a smoother Index price? What are
commenters' views on any potential effect of the price dragging
technique, in which the primary factor considered when updating the
Reference Price for each of the individual SPY options is whether or
not a trade has occurred, on the price efficiency of the SPIKES Index,
including whether the price dragging technique may result in stale
prices?
Do commenters believe that the lack of proposed position
limits on cash-settled SPIKES Index options could make the options more
susceptible to manipulation? \64\ Why or why not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ See, e.g., Hans R. Dutt & Lawrence E. Harris, Position
Limits for Cash-Settled Derivative Contracts, 25 J. Futures Mkts.
945 (2005) (arguing that limits on the positions that traders can
carry into final settlement can be used to mitigate the
susceptibility to manipulation of cash-settled derivative
contracts).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2018-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2018-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2018-14, and should be submitted on
or before August 6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15178 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P