Certain Convertible Sofas and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation, 32686-32687 [2018-14956]
Download as PDF
32686
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
cause exists for amending [the NOI]’’
under Commission Rule 210.14(b), 19
CFR 210.14(b). See ID at 2–3.
Specifically, the ID reasons that
‘‘[c]orrecting a clerical error constitutes
good cause to amend [the NOI]’’ and
that ‘‘Complainant did not improperly
delay in bringing [the Motion].’’ See id.
at 3. The ID also finds that ‘‘amending
the [NOI] to add claim 30 will not
prejudice Respondent’’ because ‘‘[t]he
parties proceeded throughout discovery
as if claim 30 was within the scope of
the Investigation.’’ See id. at 4.
No petition for review of the subject
ID was filed. The Commission has
determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 9, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–14954 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1122]
Certain Convertible Sofas and
Components Thereof; Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on June
7, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
Sauder Manufacturing Company of
Archbold, Ohio. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on June 14, 2018.
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain convertible sofas
and components thereof by reason of
infringement of U.S. Design Patent No.
716,576 (‘‘the ’576 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine M. Hiner, The Office of
Docket Services, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 6, 2018, ORDERED THAT—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of products identified in
paragraph (2) by reason of infringement
of the claim of the ’576 patent; and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘convertible sofas that
include the unitary combination of two
upholstered seating areas, each bordered
on the lateral end with a vertical
armrest, such areas being separated by
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a flat table member that can be placed
substantially level with the seating areas
as well as raised above the level of the
seating areas to various degrees to
provide an open space beneath the table
and for the full width of the table. In
addition, the sofa includes a full width,
integral backrest that can be folded
down on top of the seats and table to
provide a sleep/rest surface’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Sauder
Manufacturing Company, 930 West
Barre Road, Archbold, OH 43502.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Krug, Inc., 111 Ahrens Street, Kitchener,
Ontario, Canada N2C 1L5
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge;
(5) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not be named as a
party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
Issued: July 9, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–14956 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–18–033]
Government in the Sunshine Act
Meeting Notice
United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: July 19, 2018 at 11:00
a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 731–TA–1378
and 1379 (Final) (Low Melt Polyester
Staple Fiber from Korea and Taiwan).
The Commission is currently scheduled
to complete and file its determinations
and views of the Commission by August
1, 2018.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 10, 2018.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–15106 Filed 7–11–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Compresensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On July 9, 2018, a proposed Consent
Decree in Emhart Industries, et al. v.
United States et al., Civil Action No.
11–023, was filed with the United States
District Court for Rhode Island.
The proposed Consent Decree has
been signed by the United States of
America, the State of Rhode Island,
Emhart Industries, Inc., and Black &
Decker Inc. It will resolve the claims
between the parties relating to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
cleanup of the Centredale Manor
Superfund Site in North Providence,
Rhode Island under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42
U.S.C. 9601 et seq. The proposed
Consent Decree requires Emhart and
Black & Decker to undertake work to
clean up the Centredale Site and to pay
the United States’ and Rhode Islands’
costs. It also commits the United States
to pay a portion of the cleanup costs on
behalf of the Department of Defense.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to: Emhart Industries et al. v.
United States et al., Civil Action No.
11–023, D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–07101/2. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $183.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a copy of the
consent decree without appendices,
send a check for $12.00.
Robert Maher,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–14973 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32687
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0065]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension
With Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection 2013 Private
Industry Feedback Survey
Cyber Division, Federal Bureau
of Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Cyber Division (CyD) has
submitted the following Information
Collection Request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the established review procedures
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional days
until August 13, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Stacy Stevens, Unit Chief, FBI, Cyber
Division, 935 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20535 (facsimile: 703–
633–5797; email: slstevens2@fbi.gov) or
Stacey Rubin, Management and Program
Analyst, FBI, Cyber Division, 935
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20535 (facsimile: 703–633–5797; email:
sjrubin@fbi.gov). Written comments
and/or suggestions can also be directed
to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32686-32687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14956]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1122]
Certain Convertible Sofas and Components Thereof; Institution of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 7, 2018, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Sauder
Manufacturing Company of Archbold, Ohio. A supplement to the complaint
was filed on June 14, 2018. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain convertible sofas and components thereof
by reason of infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. 716,576 (``the '576
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue limited exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine M. Hiner, The Office of
Docket Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on July 6, 2018, ORDERED THAT--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of products identified
in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of the claim of the '576
patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``convertible sofas
that include the unitary combination of two upholstered seating areas,
each bordered on the lateral end with a vertical armrest, such areas
being separated by a flat table member that can be placed substantially
level with the seating areas as well as raised above the level of the
seating areas to various degrees to provide an open space beneath the
table and for the full width of the table. In addition, the sofa
includes a full width, integral backrest that can be folded down on top
of the seats and table to provide a sleep/rest surface'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Sauder Manufacturing Company, 930 West
Barre Road, Archbold, OH 43502.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served: Krug, Inc., 111 Ahrens Street, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
N2C 1L5
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge;
(5) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be named as
a party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 32687]]
Issued: July 9, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-14956 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P