Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Firm Participation Guarantee for a Floor Broker, 31201-31203 [2018-14301]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Notices Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeBZX–2018–042, and should be submitted on or before July 24, 2018. statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.36 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change [FR Doc. 2018–14297 Filed 7–2–18; 8:45 am] Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CboeBZX–2018–042 on the subject line. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Firm Participation Guarantee for a Floor Broker Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeBZX–2018–042. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 14, 2018, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Jul 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 31201 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–83547; File No. SR–Phlx– 2018–48] June 28, 2018. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .02 to Rule 1064. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these PO 00000 36 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12) and (59). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1064 entitled ‘‘Crossing, Facilitation and Solicited Orders.’’ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .02(ii) to Rule 1064 to amend the firm participation guarantee for a Floor Broker. Today, Phlx offers certain firm participation guarantees to a Floor Broker who holds an equity, index or U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency option order of the eligible order size or greater (‘‘original order’’), the Floor Broker is entitled to cross a certain percentage of the original order with other orders that he is holding or in the case of a public customer order, with a facilitation order of the originating firm (i.e., the firm from which the original customer order originated). Today, the Exchange may determine, on an option by option basis, the eligible size for an order that may be transacted pursuant to this Commentary, however, the eligible order size may not be less than 500 contracts. Orders for less than 500 contracts may be crossed pursuant to Rule 1064 but are not subject to Commentary .02, subsection (iii) to Rule 1064 pertaining to participation guarantees. Similar to Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CBOE’’) the Exchange proposes to lower the eligible minimum order size from 500 to not less than 50 contracts.3 The Commission noted in an approval of the reduction from 500 to 50 for CBOE that it had already approved the facilitation mechanism of ISE, which guarantees 40% of orders to facilitating firms for order sizes of 50 or more contracts.4 In that approval order the Exchange approved the reduction in the size requirement, from 500 to 50 contracts, because the CBOE proposal raised no new regulatory issues.5 The Commission noted that it will benefit options market participants by allowing 3 See CBOE Rule 6.74(d). Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42835 (May 26, 2000), 65 FR 35683 (June 5, 2000) (SR– CBOE–99–10) (Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to Participation Rights for Firms Crossing Orders.) 5 Id. 4 See E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 31202 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Notices sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES for substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms under the rules of the ISE and the CBOE, and will allow the CBOE to compete without disadvantage for facilitation orders.6 The Exchange notes that, today, Rule 1064, Commentary .02 provides that if the same member organization is the originating firm and also the specialist for the particular class of options to which the order relates, then the specialist is not entitled to any Enhanced Specialist Participation with respect to the particular cross transaction. The Exchange notes that this limitation is not being amended with this proposal. The specialist would not be able to obtain an allocation in excess of the 40% allocation. The Exchange believes that this reduction from 500 to 50 contracts for the firm participation guarantee will continue to incentivize floor brokers to execute crossing orders on Phlx. The Exchange continues to reward the market participant that brought together market participants and executed orders on its trading floor. Further, the reduced contract size will benefit options market participants by allowing for substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms with competing options venues. As noted in the CBOE proposal, today other competing mechanisms offer guarantees of 40% of orders to facilitating firms for order sizes of 50 or more contracts.7 The Exchange believes that the ability to obtain a 40% guarantee on smaller sized orders will incentivize market participants to competitively price trades in order to execute a greater number of smaller orders. The Exchange believes that the incentive encourages competition on Phlx and in turn benefits market participants in terms of competitive pricing for those orders. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,9 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and to protect investors and the public interest by amending the eligible minimum order size within Commentary .02(ii) of Rule 1064, from 500 to not less than 50 contracts, to promote competition. The Exchange’s proposal to lower the current eligible minimum order size in Commentary .02(ii) of Rule 1064 from 6 Id. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The amendment to Commentary .02(ii) of Rule 1064 does not impose an undue burden on intra-market competition because the proposed rule change will apply uniformly to all market participants. The Exchange currently has a competitive market for orders of 500 contracts or more, notwithstanding the current 40% firm participation guarantee for these orders, and therefore believes that extending this treatment to orders of 50 contracts or more (similar to other markets) will not have a significant impact on competition. The firm participation guarantee is designed as an incentive to market participants that bring order flow to the Phlx floor and is similar to allocation entitlements that exist on other floor based and electronic markets. The Commission has consistently found that rules entitling a market participant or participants up to 40% of an order are not inconsistent with the statutory standards of competition and free and open markets, including in approving the Exchange’s own firm participation guarantee.11 The Exchange believes that adopting a lower size threshold for this guarantee will benefit Phlx market participants by encouraging greater order flow and 10 See note 4 above. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47819 (May 8, 2003), 68 FR 25924 (May 14, 2003) (SR– Phlx–2002–17) (Approval Order). 7 See note 4 above. 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 500 to not less than 50 contracts is consistent with the Act as it should promote just and equitable principles of trade by allowing for substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms with CBOE. Phlx market participants would be permitted to compete without disadvantage for facilitation orders with CBOE which today has the eligibility size proposed by Phlx.10 The Exchange believes that this reduction from 500 to 50 contracts for the firm participation guarantee will continue to incentivize floor brokers to execute crossing orders on Phlx. The Exchange continues to reward the market participant that brought together market participants and executed orders on its trading floor. Further, the reduced contract size will benefit options market participants by allowing for substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms with competing options venues. 17:07 Jul 02, 2018 11 See Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 therefore increased opportunities for all market participants to trade, while ensuring that the trading crowd can still compete for a large portion of such orders. Furthermore, the proposal does not create an undue burden on intermarket competition because market participants would be permitted to compete without disadvantage for facilitation orders with CBOE. As noted in the CBOE proposal, today other competing mechanisms offer guarantees of 40% of orders to facilitating firms for order sizes of 50 or more contracts.12 The Exchange believes the guarantee may incentivize an increase in the flow of smaller orders to the trading floor because it will encourage market participants to offer competitive pricing in order to interact with that order flow. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 13 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder.14 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 15 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),16 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule changes may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay would allow the Exchange to more effectively compete 12 See note 4 above. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 13 15 E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Notices with CBOE by offering a firm participation allocation with the same eligibility size that CBOE currently offers. Additionally, the Commission notes that the proposed rule change is based on the current rules of CBOE 17 and that it recently approved a similar rule change for the BOX Options Exchange LLC.18 As such, the Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.19 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Phlx–2018–48 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–2018–48. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s 17 See supra note 4. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82456 (January, 8, 2008), 83 FR 1651 (January 12, 2018) (SR–BOX–2017–33) (Approval Order). 19 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 18 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Jul 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–2018–48 and should be submitted on or before July 24, 2018. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–14301 Filed 7–2–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–83539; File No. SR–BX– 2018–026] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Pilot Period for the Retail Price Improvement Program Until December 31, 2018 June 28, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 21, 2018, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared PO 00000 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 31203 by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot period for the Exchange’s Retail Price Improvement (‘‘RPI’’) Program (the ‘‘Program’’), which is set to expire on June 30, 2018, for an additional period, to expire on December 31, 2018. The Exchange has designated July 1, 2018 as the date the proposed rule change becomes effective. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to extend the pilot period of the RPI Program,3 currently scheduled to expire on June 30, 2018, for an additional period, to expire on December 31, 2018. Background In November 2014, the Commission approved the RPI Program on a pilot basis.4 The Program is designed to attract retail order flow to the Exchange, and allow such order flow to receive potential price improvement. The Program is currently limited to trades occurring at prices equal to or greater than $1.00 per share. Under the Program, a new class of market participant called a Retail Member 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73702 (November 28, 2014), 79 FR 72049 (December 4, 2014) (‘‘RPI Approval Order’’) (SR–BX–2014–048). 4 See id. E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31201-31203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83547; File No. SR-Phlx-2018-48]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Firm 
Participation Guarantee for a Floor Broker

June 28, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on June 14, 2018, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .02 to Rule 1064.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal 
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 1064 entitled ``Crossing, 
Facilitation and Solicited Orders.'' Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes to amend Commentary .02(ii) to Rule 1064 to amend the firm 
participation guarantee for a Floor Broker.
    Today, Phlx offers certain firm participation guarantees to a Floor 
Broker who holds an equity, index or U.S. dollar-settled foreign 
currency option order of the eligible order size or greater (``original 
order''), the Floor Broker is entitled to cross a certain percentage of 
the original order with other orders that he is holding or in the case 
of a public customer order, with a facilitation order of the 
originating firm (i.e., the firm from which the original customer order 
originated). Today, the Exchange may determine, on an option by option 
basis, the eligible size for an order that may be transacted pursuant 
to this Commentary, however, the eligible order size may not be less 
than 500 contracts. Orders for less than 500 contracts may be crossed 
pursuant to Rule 1064 but are not subject to Commentary .02, subsection 
(iii) to Rule 1064 pertaining to participation guarantees. Similar to 
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'') the Exchange proposes to lower the 
eligible minimum order size from 500 to not less than 50 contracts.\3\ 
The Commission noted in an approval of the reduction from 500 to 50 for 
CBOE that it had already approved the facilitation mechanism of ISE, 
which guarantees 40% of orders to facilitating firms for order sizes of 
50 or more contracts.\4\ In that approval order the Exchange approved 
the reduction in the size requirement, from 500 to 50 contracts, 
because the CBOE proposal raised no new regulatory issues.\5\ The 
Commission noted that it will benefit options market participants by 
allowing

[[Page 31202]]

for substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms under the 
rules of the ISE and the CBOE, and will allow the CBOE to compete 
without disadvantage for facilitation orders.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See CBOE Rule 6.74(d).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42835 (May 26, 
2000), 65 FR 35683 (June 5, 2000) (SR-CBOE-99-10) (Order Approving 
Proposed Rule Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting 
Accelerated Approval to Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the Proposed 
Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to 
Participation Rights for Firms Crossing Orders.)
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that, today, Rule 1064, Commentary .02 provides 
that if the same member organization is the originating firm and also 
the specialist for the particular class of options to which the order 
relates, then the specialist is not entitled to any Enhanced Specialist 
Participation with respect to the particular cross transaction. The 
Exchange notes that this limitation is not being amended with this 
proposal. The specialist would not be able to obtain an allocation in 
excess of the 40% allocation.
    The Exchange believes that this reduction from 500 to 50 contracts 
for the firm participation guarantee will continue to incentivize floor 
brokers to execute crossing orders on Phlx. The Exchange continues to 
reward the market participant that brought together market participants 
and executed orders on its trading floor. Further, the reduced contract 
size will benefit options market participants by allowing for 
substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms with 
competing options venues. As noted in the CBOE proposal, today other 
competing mechanisms offer guarantees of 40% of orders to facilitating 
firms for order sizes of 50 or more contracts.\7\ The Exchange believes 
that the ability to obtain a 40% guarantee on smaller sized orders will 
incentivize market participants to competitively price trades in order 
to execute a greater number of smaller orders. The Exchange believes 
that the incentive encourages competition on Phlx and in turn benefits 
market participants in terms of competitive pricing for those orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See note 4 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade and to protect investors and the 
public interest by amending the eligible minimum order size within 
Commentary .02(ii) of Rule 1064, from 500 to not less than 50 
contracts, to promote competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to lower the current eligible minimum order 
size in Commentary .02(ii) of Rule 1064 from 500 to not less than 50 
contracts is consistent with the Act as it should promote just and 
equitable principles of trade by allowing for substantially consistent 
treatment of crossing mechanisms with CBOE. Phlx market participants 
would be permitted to compete without disadvantage for facilitation 
orders with CBOE which today has the eligibility size proposed by 
Phlx.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See note 4 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that this reduction from 500 to 50 contracts 
for the firm participation guarantee will continue to incentivize floor 
brokers to execute crossing orders on Phlx. The Exchange continues to 
reward the market participant that brought together market participants 
and executed orders on its trading floor. Further, the reduced contract 
size will benefit options market participants by allowing for 
substantially consistent treatment of crossing mechanisms with 
competing options venues.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The amendment to Commentary 
.02(ii) of Rule 1064 does not impose an undue burden on intra-market 
competition because the proposed rule change will apply uniformly to 
all market participants. The Exchange currently has a competitive 
market for orders of 500 contracts or more, notwithstanding the current 
40% firm participation guarantee for these orders, and therefore 
believes that extending this treatment to orders of 50 contracts or 
more (similar to other markets) will not have a significant impact on 
competition. The firm participation guarantee is designed as an 
incentive to market participants that bring order flow to the Phlx 
floor and is similar to allocation entitlements that exist on other 
floor based and electronic markets. The Commission has consistently 
found that rules entitling a market participant or participants up to 
40% of an order are not inconsistent with the statutory standards of 
competition and free and open markets, including in approving the 
Exchange's own firm participation guarantee.\11\ The Exchange believes 
that adopting a lower size threshold for this guarantee will benefit 
Phlx market participants by encouraging greater order flow and 
therefore increased opportunities for all market participants to trade, 
while ensuring that the trading crowd can still compete for a large 
portion of such orders. Furthermore, the proposal does not create an 
undue burden on inter-market competition because market participants 
would be permitted to compete without disadvantage for facilitation 
orders with CBOE. As noted in the CBOE proposal, today other competing 
mechanisms offer guarantees of 40% of orders to facilitating firms for 
order sizes of 50 or more contracts.\12\ The Exchange believes the 
guarantee may incentivize an increase in the flow of smaller orders to 
the trading floor because it will encourage market participants to 
offer competitive pricing in order to interact with that order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47819 (May 8, 
2003), 68 FR 25924 (May 14, 2003) (SR-Phlx-2002-17) (Approval 
Order).
    \12\ See note 4 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \13\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \15\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\16\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests 
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the 
proposed rule changes may become operative immediately upon filing. The 
Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay would allow the 
Exchange to more effectively compete

[[Page 31203]]

with CBOE by offering a firm participation allocation with the same 
eligibility size that CBOE currently offers. Additionally, the 
Commission notes that the proposed rule change is based on the current 
rules of CBOE \17\ and that it recently approved a similar rule change 
for the BOX Options Exchange LLC.\18\ As such, the Commission believes 
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the 
Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the 
proposed rule change operative upon filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \17\ See supra note 4.
    \18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82456 (January, 8, 
2008), 83 FR 1651 (January 12, 2018) (SR-BOX-2017-33) (Approval 
Order).
    \19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-Phlx-2018-48 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2018-48. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2018-48 and should be submitted on 
or before July 24, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14301 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.