Certain Earpiece Devices and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation, 30776-30777 [2018-13962]

Download as PDF 30776 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices BURDEN TABLE—Continued Citation 30 CFR part 580, as applicable Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Average number of annual responses Hour burden Annual burden hours Non-hour cost burden 1 60; 61 ................................ Request reimbursement for costs of reproducing data/information & certain processing costs. 1 1 request 3 ....................... 1 70 ...................................... Enter disclosure agreement ....................................... 4 1 agreement .................... 4 72(b) .................................. Submit comments on BOEM’s intent to disclose data/information for reproduction, processing, and interpretation. 4 1 response ....................... 4 72(d) .................................. Independent contractor or agent prepares and signs written commitment not to sell, trade, license, or disclose data/information without BOEM approval. 4 2 submissions .................. 8 Subtotal ...................... .................................................................................... ........................ 13 Responses .................. 44 General Part 580 ............................ General departure and alternative compliance requests not specifically covered elsewhere in Part 580 regulations. 4 1 request .......................... 4 Permits 4 ............................ Request extension of permit/authorization time period. 1 2 requests ........................ 2 Permits 4 ............................ Retain G&G data/information for 10 years and make available to BOEM upon request. 1 4 respondents .................. 4 Subtotal ...................... .................................................................................... ........................ 7 Responses .................... 10 Total Burden ....... .................................................................................... ........................ 38 Responses .................. 485 $4,024 non-hour cost burdens 1 Fees are subject to modification for inflation annually. permits, not authorizations, are subject to cost recovery. requests received for many years. Minimal burden for regulatory (PRA) purposes only. 4 These permits/authorizations are prepared by BOEM and sent to respondents; therefore, the forms themselves do not incur burden hours. 2 Only 3 No An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Dated: June 22, 2018. Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, Chief, Office of Policy, Regulation and Analysis. [FR Doc. 2018–14046 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1121] Certain Earpiece Devices and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 24, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Bose Corporation of Framingham, Massachusetts. A supplemental exhibit was filed on June 8, 2018. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain earpiece devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,036,852 (‘‘the ’852 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,036,853 (‘‘the ’853 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,042,590 (‘‘the ’590 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,311,253 (‘‘the ’253 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,249,287 (‘‘the ’287 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 9,398,364 (‘‘the ’364 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general or limited exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 22, 2018, Ordered That— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 5, 7, 9, and 14 of the ’852 patent; claims 1–3, 6, 8, 10, and 11 of the ’853 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 of the ’590 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, and 6 of the ’253 patent; claims 1 and 6–8 of the ’287 patent; and claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, and 16 of the ’364 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘in-ear headphones and accessories using a retaining structure to secure the device in a user’s ear’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Bose Corporation, 100 Mountain Road, Framingham, MA 01701. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: 1MORE USA, Inc., 10225 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A202, San Diego, CA 92121 APSkins, 140 Lakeside Avenue, Suite A #334, Seattle, WA 98122 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 Beeebo Online Limited, 3837 Bay Lake Trail, Suite 115, North Las Vegas, NV 89030 iHip, 19 Progress Street, Edison, NJ 08820 LMZT LLC, 303 Louisiana Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11207 Misodiko, NanShanQu XiLiJieDao PingShanCun, 192 Dong 509, ShenZhen GuangDong 518055 China Phaiser LLC, 909 Silber Road, Houston, TX 77024 Phonete, A–201 No. 1 Qianwan Yilu, Qianhai Shenggang hezuoqu, Shenzhen, China REVJAMS, 248 Lafayette Street, New York, NY 10012 SMARTOMI Products, Inc., 2760 E Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761 Spigen, Inc., 9975 Toledo Way, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618–1826 Sudio AB, Upplandsgatan 7, 111 23 Stockholm, Sweden Sunvalley Tek International, Inc., 46724 Lakeview Boulevard, Fremont, CA 94538 TomRich, Room842, 3B, HuaNanXiYuan, PingHu Town, LongGang District, Shenzhen, 518100 China (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 30777 and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 25, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–13962 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third Review)] Folding Gift Boxes From China Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines,2 pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on February 1, 2018 (83 FR 4679) and determined on May 7, 2018 that it would conduct an expedited review (83 FR 24341, May 25, 2018). The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on July 2, 2018. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4800 (July 2018), entitled Folding Gift Boxes from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 26, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–14061 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Kearns did not participate in this five-year review. E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30776-30777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13962]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1121]


Certain Earpiece Devices and Components Thereof; Institution of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 24, 2018, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Bose Corporation of 
Framingham, Massachusetts. A supplemental exhibit was filed on June 8, 
2018. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain earpiece 
devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent 
No. 9,036,852 (``the '852 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,036,853 (``the 
'853 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,042,590 (``the '590 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 8,311,253 (``the '253 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,249,287 
(``the '287 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 9,398,364 (``the '364 
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general or limited 
exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and 
cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained

[[Page 30777]]

by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 22, 2018, Ordered That--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of products identified 
in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 
5, 7, 9, and 14 of the '852 patent; claims 1-3, 6, 8, 10, and 11 of the 
'853 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 of the '590 patent; claims 1, 
3, 4, and 6 of the '253 patent; claims 1 and 6-8 of the '287 patent; 
and claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, and 16 of the '364 patent; and whether an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``in-ear headphones 
and accessories using a retaining structure to secure the device in a 
user's ear'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Bose Corporation, 100 Mountain Road, 
Framingham, MA 01701.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

1MORE USA, Inc., 10225 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A202, San Diego, CA 
92121
APSkins, 140 Lakeside Avenue, Suite A #334, Seattle, WA 98122
Beeebo Online Limited, 3837 Bay Lake Trail, Suite 115, North Las Vegas, 
NV 89030
iHip, 19 Progress Street, Edison, NJ 08820
LMZT LLC, 303 Louisiana Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11207
Misodiko, NanShanQu XiLiJieDao PingShanCun, 192 Dong 509, ShenZhen 
GuangDong 518055 China
Phaiser LLC, 909 Silber Road, Houston, TX 77024
Phonete, A-201 No. 1 Qianwan Yilu, Qianhai Shenggang hezuoqu, Shenzhen, 
China
REVJAMS, 248 Lafayette Street, New York, NY 10012
SMARTOMI Products, Inc., 2760 E Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761
Spigen, Inc., 9975 Toledo Way, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618-1826
Sudio AB, Upplandsgatan 7, 111 23 Stockholm, Sweden
Sunvalley Tek International, Inc., 46724 Lakeview Boulevard, Fremont, 
CA 94538
TomRich, Room842, 3B, HuaNanXiYuan, PingHu Town, LongGang District, 
Shenzhen, 518100 China

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 25, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
 Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-13962 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.