Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Liquidity Risk Management, 29146-29148 [2018-13378]
Download as PDF
29146
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Notices
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2018–253; CP2018–254]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: June 25,
2018.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service has filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
requests(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.40.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: CP2018–253; Filing
Title: Notice of United States Postal
Service of Filing a Functionally
Equivalent Global Expedited Package
Services 9 Negotiated Service
Agreement and Application for NonPublic Treatment of Materials Filed
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date:
June 15, 2018; Filing Authority: 39 CFR
3015.5; Public Representative: Matthew
R. Ashford; Comments Due: June 25,
2018.
2. Docket No(s).: CP2018–254; Filing
Title: Notice of the United States Postal
Service of Filing a Functionally
Equivalent Global Plus 1D Negotiated
Service Agreement and Application for
Non-Public Treatment of Materials Filed
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date:
June 15, 2018; Filing Authority: 39 CFR
3015.5; Public Representative: Matthew
R. Ashford; Comments Due: June 25,
2018.
This notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 4,
2018, Banque Centrale de
Compensation, which conducts
business under the name LCH SA (‘‘LCH
SA’’), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change (the
‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’) described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been primarily prepared by LCH
SA. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
Proposed Rule Change from interested
persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
LCH SA is proposing to amend its
Risk Management Procedures (the
‘‘Procedures’’) to adopt a Liquidity Risk
Modelling Framework (the
‘‘Framework’’), which describes the
Liquidity Stress Testing framework by
which the Collateral and Liquidity Risk
Management department (‘‘CaLRM’’) of
LCH Group Holdings Limited (‘‘LCH
Group’’) assures that LCH SA has
enough cash available to meet any
financial obligations, both expected and
unexpected, that may arise over the
liquidation period for each of the
clearing services that LCH SA offers.3
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission,
LCH SA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
Proposed Rule Change and discussed
any comments it received on the
Proposed Rule Change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. LCH
SA has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
A. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
LCH SA currently maintains a number
of well-developed policies and
procedures designed to manage its
[FR Doc. 2018–13382 Filed 6–21–18; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–83456; File No. SR–LCH
SA–2018–003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH
SA; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Liquidity Risk
Management
June 18, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 LCH SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of LCH
Group, manages its liquidity risk pursuant to,
among other policies and procedures, the Group
Liquidity Risk Policy and the Group Liquidity Plan
applicable to each entity within LCH Group.
In addition to its CDSClear service, LCH SA
provides clearing services in connection with cash
equities and derivatives listed for trading on
Euronext (EquityClear), commodity derivatives
listed for trading on Euronext (CommodityClear),
and tri-party Repo transactions (RepoClear).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
liquidity risk, i.e., the risk that LCH SA
will not have enough cash available, in
extreme but plausible circumstances, to
settle margin payments or delivery
obligations when they become due, in
particular upon the default of a clearing
member. Such policies and procedures
include, among others: (i) The Group
Liquidity Risk Policy; (ii) the Group
Liquidity Plan; (iii) the Group Financial
Resource Adequacy Plan; (iv) the Group
Collateral Risk Policy; (v) the Group
Investment Risk Policy; and (vi) the
LCH SA Collateral Control Framework.
As described below, the proposed
Framework would complement these
existing policies and procedures and
develop further the Group Liquidity
Risk Policy.
In brief, the Framework: (i) Identifies
LCH SA’s sources of liquidity and
corresponding liquidity risks; (ii)
identifies LCH SA’s liquidity
requirements with respect to its
members and its interoperable central
counterparty (‘‘CCP’’); 4 (iii) describes
the metrics and limits that LCH SA
monitors; and (iv) describes the
scenarios under which these metrics are
computed.
The proposed Framework first
identifies the main sources of liquidity
available to LCH SA, cash and non-cash
collateral, and assigns non-cash
collateral to one of three tiers.5 Tier 1
assets are limited to those securities that
are deemed to be of sufficient quality
and demand to generate liquidity at
little or no loss in the event of a default
of a clearing member or a major market
stress. LCH SA is able to pledge these
securities to the Banque de France to
generate cash on the same day. Only
Tier 1 assets are included as liquidity
resources in liquidity stress testing.6
The proposed Framework then
highlights the three principal events
4 LCH SA has an interoperability agreement with
Cassa di Compensazione e Garanzia (‘‘CC&G’’), an
Italian CCP, pursuant to which LCH SA’s clearing
members and CC&G’s clearing members are able to
benefit from common clearing services without
having to join the other CCP. Each CCP is a clearing
member of the other one with a particular status
when accessing the clearing system of the other
counterparty.
5 Securities comprising non-cash collateral are
comprised of the following components: (i) Margin
collateral, i.e., non-cash collateral pledged by
clearing members for margin cover; (ii) Collateral
and Liquidity Management (‘‘CaLM’’) collateral, i.e.,
direct securities holdings that are part of the
CaLM’s investment activities; and (iii) clearing
settlement collateral, i.e., collateral resulting from
the physical settlement of contracts on behalf of a
defaulting clearing member.
6 Tier 2 assets are those securities that have a
market and may be financed but are of lesser quality
than Tier 1 assets. Tier 3 assets are deemed to have
little or no liquidity value in the event of a default
or major market stress or are deemed to be too
illiquid to be converted in the timeframe that a CCP
would require.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
under which LCH SA would require
liquidity: (i) The default of one or more
clearing members; (ii) the default of
CC&G; and (iii) operational liquidity
needs (each defined below).
The proposed Framework also
examines liquidity needs arising from
members’ defaults, liquidity needs
arising from an interoperating central
counterparty’s default (currently CC&G),
and the manner in which operational
liquidity requirements are determined.
Liquidity needs arising from members’
defaults are those needs arising from
fulfilment of the settlement of the
securities of the defaulted clearing
member; posting of variation margin to
non-defaulting members on the
positions held by the defaulted clearing
member(s); the value of bonds pledged
at the Banque de France; haircuts by the
European Central Bank on securities
posted by the defaulting Clearing
Member; and investment losses.
Liquidity needs arising from
interoperating CCPs’ defaults are those
needs arising from the service closure of
the Italian Clearing activity (e.g.
reimbursement of the margins and
default funds related to the Italian
clearing activity, cash settlement of the
Italian repo positions). Operational
liquidity is defined as the amount of
liquidity that LCH SA is required to
hold to satisfy liquidity needs related to
the operational management of LCH SA
in a stressed environment that does not
lead to a member’s default. Such
liquidity requirements arise from a
number of factors, including the need to
repay excess cash posted by members,
the need to repay margin when margin
requirements are reduced, and the
substitution of cash collateral and
European Central Bank eligible
securities.
The proposed Framework next
describes the metrics used to determine
LCH SA’s liquidity needs that are
calculated each day over a five-day
period. Such metrics include: (i) The
liquidity coverage ratio; (ii) a monthly
rolling average liquidity buffer; (iii) a
daily minimum liquidity buffer; and (iv)
required cash collateral.
With respect to the liquidity coverage
ratio, the proposed Framework explains
how the liquidity coverage ratio is
determined for each of the clearing
services that LCH SA offers in a Cover
2 scenario, i.e., the liquidity risk arising
from the default of at least two clearing
group members to which LCH SA has
the largest exposures during the 5 days
following default. The Cover 2 amount
is computed by aggregating the liquidity
risks related to clearing members within
the same group across all of LCH SA’s
services. The two largest group members
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29147
are chosen according to the liquidity
needs related to these members. The
liquidity requirements are generated by
three risk drivers: The settlement risk,
market risk and the ECB haircut. For the
CDSClear service, LCH SA determines
the liquidity risk by considering
variation margin modelled at member
level by applying the most punitive CDS
spread widening stress scenario for both
ITraxx Main and CrossOver (currently
the historical scenario considering the
2007 crisis). The Framework focuses on
the principal risks for which LCH SA
must assure that it has sufficient
liquidity.
Finally, the Framework describes the
reverse stress test that LCH SA runs at
least quarterly. The reverse stress test is
designed to help determine the limits of
the models and of the liquidity risk
management framework by modelling
extreme market conditions that go
beyond what are considered plausible
market conditions over a 5-day time
horizon. LCH SA stresses seven risk
factors independently, and also
considers these risk factors together in
two combined reverse stress test
scenarios, the Behavioural and Macroeconomic.
2. Statutory Basis
LCH SA has determined that the
Proposed Rule Change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 17A of
the Act 7 and regulations thereunder
applicable to it. The Framework
implements the provisions of Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,8 which require,
inter alia, that the rules of a clearing
agency ‘‘assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds that are in its
custody or control or for which it is
responsible.’’ Further, Regulation 17dA–
22(e) requires a clearing agency to
maintain and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
‘‘measure, monitor, and manage the
liquidity risk that arises in or is borne
by the covered clearing agency.’’ 9
Consistent with these provisions, the
Framework assures that the clearing
agency maintains sufficient liquid
resources to effect the settlement of
payment obligations with a high degree
of confidence under a wide range of
foreseeable stress scenarios.10
7 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7).
10 The proposed Framework is also consistent
with LCH SA’s obligations under the European
Markets Infrastructure Regulation (‘‘EMIR’’);
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on
OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade
reporting.
In particular, EMIR Article 44 provides, in part:
8 15
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
Continued
22JNN1
29148
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2018 / Notices
B. Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
LCH SA does not believe the
Proposed Rule Change would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on
competition. The Proposed Rule Change
does not address any competitive issue
or have any impact on the competition
among central counterparties. LCH SA
operates an open access model, and the
Proposed Rule Change will have no
effect on this model.
C. Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
Proposed Rule Change have not been
solicited or received. LCH SA will
notify the Commission of any written
comments received by LCH SA.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
LCH SA–2018–003 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
‘‘A CCP shall at all times have access to adequate
liquidity to perform its services and activities. . . .
A CCP shall measure, on a daily basis, its potential
liquidity needs [taking] into account the liquidity
risk generated by the default of at least the two
clearing members to which it has the largest
exposures.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jun 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–LCH SA–2018–003. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of LCH SA and on LCH SA’s
website at https://www.lch.com/assetclasses/cdsclear.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–LCH SA–2018–003
and should be submitted on or before
July 12, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–13378 Filed 6–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83458; File No. SR–Phlx–
2018–47]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 1101A, Terms of Option Contracts
June 18, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 11,
2018, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 1101A, Terms of Option
Contracts.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt new Commentary .06
to Exchange Rules 1101A, to codify that
the Exchange will defer to The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in
determining settlement prices for index
options when OCC elects to do so in
accordance with its own rules and
bylaws. Such OCC-determined
settlement prices may be determined in
a manner that differs from the
settlement price procedures under the
Exchange’s own rules.
Exchange Rule 1101A(d) currently
states that the Rules of the Options
Clearing Corporation specify that,
unless the Rules of the Exchange
provide otherwise, the current index
1 15
11 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
22JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29146-29148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13378]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-83456; File No. SR-LCH SA-2018-003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Liquidity Risk Management
June 18, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 4, 2018, Banque Centrale de Compensation, which conducts
business under the name LCH SA (``LCH SA''), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change (the
``Proposed Rule Change'') described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been primarily prepared by LCH SA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the Proposed Rule Change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
LCH SA is proposing to amend its Risk Management Procedures (the
``Procedures'') to adopt a Liquidity Risk Modelling Framework (the
``Framework''), which describes the Liquidity Stress Testing framework
by which the Collateral and Liquidity Risk Management department
(``CaLRM'') of LCH Group Holdings Limited (``LCH Group'') assures that
LCH SA has enough cash available to meet any financial obligations,
both expected and unexpected, that may arise over the liquidation
period for each of the clearing services that LCH SA offers.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ LCH SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of LCH Group, manages its
liquidity risk pursuant to, among other policies and procedures, the
Group Liquidity Risk Policy and the Group Liquidity Plan applicable
to each entity within LCH Group.
In addition to its CDSClear service, LCH SA provides clearing
services in connection with cash equities and derivatives listed for
trading on Euronext (EquityClear), commodity derivatives listed for
trading on Euronext (CommodityClear), and tri-party Repo
transactions (RepoClear).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, LCH SA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the Proposed Rule Change and
discussed any comments it received on the Proposed Rule Change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. LCH SA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
LCH SA currently maintains a number of well-developed policies and
procedures designed to manage its
[[Page 29147]]
liquidity risk, i.e., the risk that LCH SA will not have enough cash
available, in extreme but plausible circumstances, to settle margin
payments or delivery obligations when they become due, in particular
upon the default of a clearing member. Such policies and procedures
include, among others: (i) The Group Liquidity Risk Policy; (ii) the
Group Liquidity Plan; (iii) the Group Financial Resource Adequacy Plan;
(iv) the Group Collateral Risk Policy; (v) the Group Investment Risk
Policy; and (vi) the LCH SA Collateral Control Framework. As described
below, the proposed Framework would complement these existing policies
and procedures and develop further the Group Liquidity Risk Policy.
In brief, the Framework: (i) Identifies LCH SA's sources of
liquidity and corresponding liquidity risks; (ii) identifies LCH SA's
liquidity requirements with respect to its members and its
interoperable central counterparty (``CCP''); \4\ (iii) describes the
metrics and limits that LCH SA monitors; and (iv) describes the
scenarios under which these metrics are computed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ LCH SA has an interoperability agreement with Cassa di
Compensazione e Garanzia (``CC&G''), an Italian CCP, pursuant to
which LCH SA's clearing members and CC&G's clearing members are able
to benefit from common clearing services without having to join the
other CCP. Each CCP is a clearing member of the other one with a
particular status when accessing the clearing system of the other
counterparty.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed Framework first identifies the main sources of
liquidity available to LCH SA, cash and non-cash collateral, and
assigns non-cash collateral to one of three tiers.\5\ Tier 1 assets are
limited to those securities that are deemed to be of sufficient quality
and demand to generate liquidity at little or no loss in the event of a
default of a clearing member or a major market stress. LCH SA is able
to pledge these securities to the Banque de France to generate cash on
the same day. Only Tier 1 assets are included as liquidity resources in
liquidity stress testing.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Securities comprising non-cash collateral are comprised of
the following components: (i) Margin collateral, i.e., non-cash
collateral pledged by clearing members for margin cover; (ii)
Collateral and Liquidity Management (``CaLM'') collateral, i.e.,
direct securities holdings that are part of the CaLM's investment
activities; and (iii) clearing settlement collateral, i.e.,
collateral resulting from the physical settlement of contracts on
behalf of a defaulting clearing member.
\6\ Tier 2 assets are those securities that have a market and
may be financed but are of lesser quality than Tier 1 assets. Tier 3
assets are deemed to have little or no liquidity value in the event
of a default or major market stress or are deemed to be too illiquid
to be converted in the timeframe that a CCP would require.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed Framework then highlights the three principal events
under which LCH SA would require liquidity: (i) The default of one or
more clearing members; (ii) the default of CC&G; and (iii) operational
liquidity needs (each defined below).
The proposed Framework also examines liquidity needs arising from
members' defaults, liquidity needs arising from an interoperating
central counterparty's default (currently CC&G), and the manner in
which operational liquidity requirements are determined. Liquidity
needs arising from members' defaults are those needs arising from
fulfilment of the settlement of the securities of the defaulted
clearing member; posting of variation margin to non-defaulting members
on the positions held by the defaulted clearing member(s); the value of
bonds pledged at the Banque de France; haircuts by the European Central
Bank on securities posted by the defaulting Clearing Member; and
investment losses. Liquidity needs arising from interoperating CCPs'
defaults are those needs arising from the service closure of the
Italian Clearing activity (e.g. reimbursement of the margins and
default funds related to the Italian clearing activity, cash settlement
of the Italian repo positions). Operational liquidity is defined as the
amount of liquidity that LCH SA is required to hold to satisfy
liquidity needs related to the operational management of LCH SA in a
stressed environment that does not lead to a member's default. Such
liquidity requirements arise from a number of factors, including the
need to repay excess cash posted by members, the need to repay margin
when margin requirements are reduced, and the substitution of cash
collateral and European Central Bank eligible securities.
The proposed Framework next describes the metrics used to determine
LCH SA's liquidity needs that are calculated each day over a five-day
period. Such metrics include: (i) The liquidity coverage ratio; (ii) a
monthly rolling average liquidity buffer; (iii) a daily minimum
liquidity buffer; and (iv) required cash collateral.
With respect to the liquidity coverage ratio, the proposed
Framework explains how the liquidity coverage ratio is determined for
each of the clearing services that LCH SA offers in a Cover 2 scenario,
i.e., the liquidity risk arising from the default of at least two
clearing group members to which LCH SA has the largest exposures during
the 5 days following default. The Cover 2 amount is computed by
aggregating the liquidity risks related to clearing members within the
same group across all of LCH SA's services. The two largest group
members are chosen according to the liquidity needs related to these
members. The liquidity requirements are generated by three risk
drivers: The settlement risk, market risk and the ECB haircut. For the
CDSClear service, LCH SA determines the liquidity risk by considering
variation margin modelled at member level by applying the most punitive
CDS spread widening stress scenario for both ITraxx Main and CrossOver
(currently the historical scenario considering the 2007 crisis). The
Framework focuses on the principal risks for which LCH SA must assure
that it has sufficient liquidity.
Finally, the Framework describes the reverse stress test that LCH
SA runs at least quarterly. The reverse stress test is designed to help
determine the limits of the models and of the liquidity risk management
framework by modelling extreme market conditions that go beyond what
are considered plausible market conditions over a 5-day time horizon.
LCH SA stresses seven risk factors independently, and also considers
these risk factors together in two combined reverse stress test
scenarios, the Behavioural and Macro-economic.
2. Statutory Basis
LCH SA has determined that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \7\ and regulations
thereunder applicable to it. The Framework implements the provisions of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,\8\ which require, inter alia, that the
rules of a clearing agency ``assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds that are in its custody or control or for which it is
responsible.'' Further, Regulation 17dA-22(e) requires a clearing
agency to maintain and enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to ``measure, monitor, and manage the liquidity
risk that arises in or is borne by the covered clearing agency.'' \9\
Consistent with these provisions, the Framework assures that the
clearing agency maintains sufficient liquid resources to effect the
settlement of payment obligations with a high degree of confidence
under a wide range of foreseeable stress scenarios.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(7).
\10\ The proposed Framework is also consistent with LCH SA's
obligations under the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation
(``EMIR''); Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central
counterparties and trade reporting.
In particular, EMIR Article 44 provides, in part:
``A CCP shall at all times have access to adequate liquidity to
perform its services and activities. . . . A CCP shall measure, on a
daily basis, its potential liquidity needs [taking] into account the
liquidity risk generated by the default of at least the two clearing
members to which it has the largest exposures.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 29148]]
B. Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition
LCH SA does not believe the Proposed Rule Change would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The Proposed Rule Change
does not address any competitive issue or have any impact on the
competition among central counterparties. LCH SA operates an open
access model, and the Proposed Rule Change will have no effect on this
model.
C. Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the Proposed Rule Change have not been
solicited or received. LCH SA will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by LCH SA.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-LCH SA-2018-003 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-LCH SA-2018-003. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of LCH SA and on LCH SA's website
at https://www.lch.com/asset-classes/cdsclear.
All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-LCH SA-2018-003 and should
be submitted on or before July 12, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13378 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P