Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Commentary .07 to Rule 904, 28279-28281 [2018-12933]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2018–44 on the subject line.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2018–44. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2018–44 and
should be submitted on or before July 9,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–12929 Filed 6–15–18; 8:45 am]
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jun 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83417; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–26]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Commentary
.07 to Rule 904
June 12, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on June 8,
2018, NYSE American LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE American’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .07 to Rule 904 to amend
the position limits for options on SPDR
S&P 500 ETF (‘‘SPY’’). The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
23 17
28279
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
Rule 904 (Position Limits) establishes
position limits for aggregate positions in
option contracts traded on the
Exchange. Commentary .07 to Rule 904
lists specific position limits for certain
select underlying securities. SPY is
among the certain select underlying
securities listed in the Rule. Currently,
Rule 904 provides that there are no
position limits on options overlying
SPY pursuant to a pilot program, which
is scheduled to expire on July 12, 2018
(‘‘SPY Pilot Program’’).4
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 904, Commentary .07, to allow the
SPY Pilot Program to terminate on July
12, 2018, the current expiration date of
the SPY Pilot Program. In lieu of
extending the SPY Pilot Program, the
Exchange proposes to allow the SPY
Pilot Program to terminate and to
establish position limits of 1,800,000
contracts, for options on SPY, with such
change becoming operative on July 12,
2018, so that there is no lapse in time
between termination of the SPY Pilot
Program and the establishment of the
new limits.5 Furthermore, as a result of
the termination of the SPY Pilot
Program, the Exchange does not believe
it is necessary to submit a SPY Pilot
Program Report at the end of the SPY
Pilot Program. Based on the prior SPY
Pilot Program Reports provided to the
Commission,6 the Exchange believes it
is appropriate to terminate the SPY Pilot
Program and establish permanent
position limits for SPY.
Position limits are designed to
address potential manipulative schemes
and adverse market impact surrounding
the use of options, such as disrupting
the market in the security underlying
the options. The potential manipulative
schemes and adverse market impact are
balanced against the potential of setting
the limits so low as to discourage
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67672
(August 15, 2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012).
The SPY Pilot Program was subsequently extended.
See Securities Exchange Release Nos. 70734
(October 22, 2013), 78 FR 64255 (October 28, 2013);
73847 (December 16, 2014), 79 FR 76426 (December
22, 2014); 75416 (July 9, 2015), 80 FR 41521 (July
15, 2015); 78241 (July 7, 2016), 81 FR 45325 (July
13, 2016); and 81130 (July 12, 2017), 82 FR 32906
(July 18, 2017).
5 Pursuant to Rule 905, the exercise limit for
options on SPY is equivalent to the position limit
for SPY options and would also be amended
pursuant to this proposal.
6 See supra, note 4.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
28280
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
participation in the options market. The
level of those position limits must be
balanced between curtailing potential
manipulation and the cost of preventing
potential hedging activity that could be
used for legitimate economic purposes.
The SPY Pilot Program was
established in 2012 in order to eliminate
position and exercise limits for
physically-settled SPY options.7 In
2005, the position limits for SPY
options were increased from 75,000
contracts to 300,000 contracts on the
same side of the market.8 In July 2011,
the position limit for these options was
again increased from 300,000 contracts
to 900,000 contracts on the same side of
the market.9 Then, in 2012, the position
limits for SPY options were eliminated
as part of the SPY Pilot Program.10
The underlying SPY tracks the
performance of the S&P 500 Index and
the Exchange notes that the SPY and
SPY options have deep, liquid markets
that reduce concerns regarding
manipulation and disruption in the
underlying markets. In support of this
proposed rule change, the Exchange has
collected the following trading statistics
for SPY and SPY Options: (1) The
average daily volume (‘‘ADV’’) (as of
May 15, 2018) for SPY is 108.32 million
shares; (2) the ADV in 2018 for SPY
options is 3.9 million contracts per day;
(3) the total shares outstanding for SPY
are 965.43 million; and (4) the fund
market cap for SPY is 261.65 billion.
The Exchange represents further that
there is tremendous liquidity in the
securities that make up the S&P 500
Index.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes
to amend Commentary .07 to Rule 904
to set forth that the position limit for
options on SPY would be 1,800,000
contracts on the same side of the
market. This position limit equals the
current position limit for options on the
PowerShares QQQ Trust (‘‘QQQ’’),
which the Commission previously
approved to be increased from 900,000
contracts on the same side of the
market, to 1,800,000 contracts on the
same side of the market.11 The Exchange
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 67672
(August 15, 2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012)
(SR–NYSEAmex–2012–29); and 67937 (September
27, 2012), 77 FR 60489 (October 3, 2012) (SR–
CBOE–2012–091).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51041
(January 14, 2005), 70 FR 3408 (January 24, 2005)
(SR–CBOE–2005–06).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64928
(July 20, 2011), 76 FR 44633 (July 26, 2011) (SR–
CBOE–2011–065).
10 See supra, note 7.
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83065
(April 19, 2018), 83 FR 18093 (April 25, 2018) (SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–14); See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 82770 (February 23,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jun 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
also notes that SPY is more liquid than
QQQ.12 The Exchange believes that
establishing position limits for SPY
options in the amount of 1,800,000
contracts on the same side of the market
would allow for the maintenance of the
liquid and competitive market
environment for these options, which
will benefit customers interested in
these products. Under the proposal, the
reporting requirement for SPY options
would be unchanged.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 13 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 14
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that establishing permanent position
limits for SPY options will encourage
Market Makers to continue to provide
sufficient liquidity in SPY options on
the Exchange, which will enhance the
process of price discovery conducted on
the Exchange. The proposal will also
benefit institutional investors as well as
retail traders, and public customers, by
continuing to provide them with an
effective trading and hedging vehicle. In
addition, the Exchange believes that the
structure of SPY options and the
considerable liquidity of the market for
those options diminishes the
opportunity to manipulate this product
and disrupt the underlying market that
a lower position limit may protect
against.
Increased position limits for select
actively traded options, such as that
proposed herein (increased as compared
to the 900,000 limit in place prior to the
SPY Pilot Program),15 is not novel and
has been previously approved by the
Commission. For example, the
Commission has previously approved a
rule change permitting the Exchange to
double the position and exercise limits
for iShares China Large-Cap ETF
(‘‘FXI’’), iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
(‘‘EFA’’), iShares MSCI Emerging
Markets ETF (‘‘EEM’’), iShares Russell
2018), 83 FR 8907 (March 1, 2018) (SR–CBOE–
2017–057).
12 From the beginning of the year, through May
15, 2018, the ADV for SPY was 108.32 million
shares while the ADV for QQQ was 46.64 million
shares (calculated using data from Yahoo Finance).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
15 See supra, note 9.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2000 ETF (‘‘IWM’’), iShares MSCI Brazil
Capped ETF (‘‘EWZ’’), iShares 20+ Year
Treasury Bond Fund ETF (‘‘TLT’’),
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (‘‘EWJ’’) and
QQQ.16 Furthermore, as previously
mentioned, the Commission specifically
approved a proposal by the Exchange to
increase the position and exercise limits
for options on QQQ from 900,000
contracts on the same side of the market
to 1,800,000 contracts on the same side
of the market; similar to the current
proposal for options on SPY.17 The
Exchange also notes that SPY is more
liquid than QQQ.18
Lastly, the Commission expressed the
belief that implementing higher position
and exercise limits may bring additional
depth and liquidity without increasing
concerns regarding intermarket
manipulation or disruption of the
options or the underlying securities.19
The Exchange’s existing surveillance
and reporting safeguards are designed to
deter and detect possible manipulative
behavior which might arise from
increasing position limits (increased as
compared to the 900,000 limit in place
prior to the SPY Pilot Program).20
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not designed to
address any aspect of competition,
whether between the Exchange and its
competitors, or among market
participants. Instead, the proposed rule
change promotes competition because it
will enable the options exchanges to
attract additional order flow from the
over-the-counter market, who in turn
compete for those orders. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
will result in continued opportunities to
achieve the investment and trading
objectives of market participants seeking
efficient trading and hedging vehicles,
to the benefit of investors, market
participants, and the marketplace in
general. The Exchange believes this
proposed rule change is necessary to
permit fair competition among the
options exchanges and to establish
uniform position limits for additional
multiply listed option classes.
16 See
supra, note 11.
17 Id.
18 See
supra, note 12.
supra, note 11.
20 See supra, note 9.
19 See
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 21 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 22 thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–26 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
21 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
22 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Jun 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–26. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–26 and
should be submitted on or before July 9,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–12933 Filed 6–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Reports of Evidence of Material Violations:
SEC File No. 270–514, OMB Control No.
3235–0572
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
23 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28281
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit the existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension.
On February 6, 2003, the Commission
published final rules, effective August 5,
2003, entitled ‘‘Standards of
Professional Conduct for Attorneys
Appearing and Practicing Before the
Commission in the Representation of an
Issuer’’ (17 CFR 205.1–205.7). The
information collection embedded in the
rules is necessary to implement the
Standards of Professional Conduct for
Attorneys prescribed by the rule and
required by Section 307 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7245). The
rules impose an ‘‘up-the-ladder’’
reporting requirement when attorneys
appearing and practicing before the
Commission become aware of evidence
of a material violation by the issuer or
any officer, director, employee, or agent
of the issuer. An issuer may choose to
establish a qualified legal compliance
committee (‘‘QLCC’’) as an alternative
procedure for reporting evidence of a
material violation. In the rare cases in
which a majority of a QLCC has
concluded that an issuer did not act
appropriately, the information may be
communicated to the Commission. The
collection of information is, therefore,
an important component of the
Commission’s program to discourage
violations of the federal securities laws
and promote ethical behavior of
attorneys appearing and practicing
before the Commission.
The respondents to this collection of
information are attorneys who appear
and practice before the Commission
and, in certain cases, the issuer, and/or
officers, directors and committees of the
issuer. We believe that, in providing
quality representation to issuers,
attorneys report evidence of violations
to others within the issuer, including
the Chief Legal Officer, the Chief
Executive Officer, and, where necessary,
the directors. In addition, officers and
directors investigate evidence of
violations and report within the issuer
the results of the investigation and the
remedial steps they have taken or
sanctions they have imposed. Except as
discussed below, we therefore believe
that the reporting requirements imposed
by the rule are ‘‘usual and customary’’
activities that do not add to the burden
that would be imposed by the collection
of information.
Certain aspects of the collection of
information, however, may impose a
burden. For an issuer to establish a
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28279-28281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-83417; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2018-26]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Commentary .07 to Rule 904
June 12, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on June 8, 2018, NYSE American LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .07 to Rule 904 to amend
the position limits for options on SPDR S&P 500 ETF (``SPY''). The
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Rule 904 (Position Limits) establishes position limits for
aggregate positions in option contracts traded on the Exchange.
Commentary .07 to Rule 904 lists specific position limits for certain
select underlying securities. SPY is among the certain select
underlying securities listed in the Rule. Currently, Rule 904 provides
that there are no position limits on options overlying SPY pursuant to
a pilot program, which is scheduled to expire on July 12, 2018 (``SPY
Pilot Program'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67672 (August 15,
2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012). The SPY Pilot Program was
subsequently extended. See Securities Exchange Release Nos. 70734
(October 22, 2013), 78 FR 64255 (October 28, 2013); 73847 (December
16, 2014), 79 FR 76426 (December 22, 2014); 75416 (July 9, 2015), 80
FR 41521 (July 15, 2015); 78241 (July 7, 2016), 81 FR 45325 (July
13, 2016); and 81130 (July 12, 2017), 82 FR 32906 (July 18, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 904, Commentary .07, to allow
the SPY Pilot Program to terminate on July 12, 2018, the current
expiration date of the SPY Pilot Program. In lieu of extending the SPY
Pilot Program, the Exchange proposes to allow the SPY Pilot Program to
terminate and to establish position limits of 1,800,000 contracts, for
options on SPY, with such change becoming operative on July 12, 2018,
so that there is no lapse in time between termination of the SPY Pilot
Program and the establishment of the new limits.\5\ Furthermore, as a
result of the termination of the SPY Pilot Program, the Exchange does
not believe it is necessary to submit a SPY Pilot Program Report at the
end of the SPY Pilot Program. Based on the prior SPY Pilot Program
Reports provided to the Commission,\6\ the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to terminate the SPY Pilot Program and establish permanent
position limits for SPY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Pursuant to Rule 905, the exercise limit for options on SPY
is equivalent to the position limit for SPY options and would also
be amended pursuant to this proposal.
\6\ See supra, note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position limits are designed to address potential manipulative
schemes and adverse market impact surrounding the use of options, such
as disrupting the market in the security underlying the options. The
potential manipulative schemes and adverse market impact are balanced
against the potential of setting the limits so low as to discourage
[[Page 28280]]
participation in the options market. The level of those position limits
must be balanced between curtailing potential manipulation and the cost
of preventing potential hedging activity that could be used for
legitimate economic purposes.
The SPY Pilot Program was established in 2012 in order to eliminate
position and exercise limits for physically-settled SPY options.\7\ In
2005, the position limits for SPY options were increased from 75,000
contracts to 300,000 contracts on the same side of the market.\8\ In
July 2011, the position limit for these options was again increased
from 300,000 contracts to 900,000 contracts on the same side of the
market.\9\ Then, in 2012, the position limits for SPY options were
eliminated as part of the SPY Pilot Program.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 67672 (August 15,
2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2012-29); and
67937 (September 27, 2012), 77 FR 60489 (October 3, 2012) (SR-CBOE-
2012-091).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51041 (January 14,
2005), 70 FR 3408 (January 24, 2005) (SR-CBOE-2005-06).
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64928 (July 20,
2011), 76 FR 44633 (July 26, 2011) (SR-CBOE-2011-065).
\10\ See supra, note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The underlying SPY tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index and
the Exchange notes that the SPY and SPY options have deep, liquid
markets that reduce concerns regarding manipulation and disruption in
the underlying markets. In support of this proposed rule change, the
Exchange has collected the following trading statistics for SPY and SPY
Options: (1) The average daily volume (``ADV'') (as of May 15, 2018)
for SPY is 108.32 million shares; (2) the ADV in 2018 for SPY options
is 3.9 million contracts per day; (3) the total shares outstanding for
SPY are 965.43 million; and (4) the fund market cap for SPY is 261.65
billion. The Exchange represents further that there is tremendous
liquidity in the securities that make up the S&P 500 Index.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .07 to Rule
904 to set forth that the position limit for options on SPY would be
1,800,000 contracts on the same side of the market. This position limit
equals the current position limit for options on the PowerShares QQQ
Trust (``QQQ''), which the Commission previously approved to be
increased from 900,000 contracts on the same side of the market, to
1,800,000 contracts on the same side of the market.\11\ The Exchange
also notes that SPY is more liquid than QQQ.\12\ The Exchange believes
that establishing position limits for SPY options in the amount of
1,800,000 contracts on the same side of the market would allow for the
maintenance of the liquid and competitive market environment for these
options, which will benefit customers interested in these products.
Under the proposal, the reporting requirement for SPY options would be
unchanged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83065 (April 19,
2018), 83 FR 18093 (April 25, 2018) (SR-NYSEAMER-2018-14); See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82770 (February 23, 2018), 83 FR
8907 (March 1, 2018) (SR-CBOE-2017-057).
\12\ From the beginning of the year, through May 15, 2018, the
ADV for SPY was 108.32 million shares while the ADV for QQQ was
46.64 million shares (calculated using data from Yahoo Finance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \13\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \14\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that establishing permanent position limits for SPY
options will encourage Market Makers to continue to provide sufficient
liquidity in SPY options on the Exchange, which will enhance the
process of price discovery conducted on the Exchange. The proposal will
also benefit institutional investors as well as retail traders, and
public customers, by continuing to provide them with an effective
trading and hedging vehicle. In addition, the Exchange believes that
the structure of SPY options and the considerable liquidity of the
market for those options diminishes the opportunity to manipulate this
product and disrupt the underlying market that a lower position limit
may protect against.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increased position limits for select actively traded options, such
as that proposed herein (increased as compared to the 900,000 limit in
place prior to the SPY Pilot Program),\15\ is not novel and has been
previously approved by the Commission. For example, the Commission has
previously approved a rule change permitting the Exchange to double the
position and exercise limits for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (``FXI''),
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (``EFA''), iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
(``EEM''), iShares Russell 2000 ETF (``IWM''), iShares MSCI Brazil
Capped ETF (``EWZ''), iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF
(``TLT''), iShares MSCI Japan ETF (``EWJ'') and QQQ.\16\ Furthermore,
as previously mentioned, the Commission specifically approved a
proposal by the Exchange to increase the position and exercise limits
for options on QQQ from 900,000 contracts on the same side of the
market to 1,800,000 contracts on the same side of the market; similar
to the current proposal for options on SPY.\17\ The Exchange also notes
that SPY is more liquid than QQQ.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See supra, note 9.
\16\ See supra, note 11.
\17\ Id.
\18\ See supra, note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Commission expressed the belief that implementing
higher position and exercise limits may bring additional depth and
liquidity without increasing concerns regarding intermarket
manipulation or disruption of the options or the underlying
securities.\19\ The Exchange's existing surveillance and reporting
safeguards are designed to deter and detect possible manipulative
behavior which might arise from increasing position limits (increased
as compared to the 900,000 limit in place prior to the SPY Pilot
Program).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See supra, note 11.
\20\ See supra, note 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not
designed to address any aspect of competition, whether between the
Exchange and its competitors, or among market participants. Instead,
the proposed rule change promotes competition because it will enable
the options exchanges to attract additional order flow from the over-
the-counter market, who in turn compete for those orders. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will result in continued
opportunities to achieve the investment and trading objectives of
market participants seeking efficient trading and hedging vehicles, to
the benefit of investors, market participants, and the marketplace in
general. The Exchange believes this proposed rule change is necessary
to permit fair competition among the options exchanges and to establish
uniform position limits for additional multiply listed option classes.
[[Page 28281]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \21\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
\22\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-26 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-26. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-26 and should be submitted
on or before July 9, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12933 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P