Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 27541-27543 [2018-12692]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2018 / Notices [FR Doc. 2018–12650 Filed 6–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–C COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Notice of Public Meeting of the Arizona Advisory Committee U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. ACTION: Announcement of meeting. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that the meeting of the Arizona Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will be held at 12:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) Friday, June 15, 2018. The purpose of this meeting is for the Committee to vote on the final draft of their advisory memorandum issued to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights focused on voting rights. DATES: These meetings will be held on Friday, June 15, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. MT. Public Call Information: Dial: 877– 719–9801 Conference ID: 4127448. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Victoria Fortes (DFO) at afortes@ usccr.gov or (213) 894–3437. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-free call-in number: 877–719–9801, conference ID number: 4127448. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over landline connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number. Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional Programs Unit within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 90012. They may be faxed to the Commission at (213) 894–0508, or emailed Ana Victoria Fortes at afortes@ amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jun 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional Programs Unit at (213) 894– 3437. Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be available for public viewing prior to and after the meetings at https://facadatabase.gov/ committee/meetings.aspx?cid=235. Please click on the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and ‘‘Documents’’ links. Records generated from these meetings may also be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, https:// www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. Agenda I. Welcome II. Approval of minutes from previous meeting III. Discuss Advisory Memorandum IV. Vote on Advisory Memorandum V. Public Comment VI. Next Steps VII. Adjournment Exceptional Circumstance: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.150, the notice for this meeting is given less than 15 calendar days prior to the meeting because of the exceptional circumstance of this Committee voting on its advisory memorandum that will supplement the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ 2018 statutory enforcement report. Dated: June 8, 2018. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2018–12691 Filed 6–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain companies covered by this administrative review made sales of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value during AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27541 the period of review (POR) November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. DATES: Applicable June 13, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan or Thomas Schauer, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2201 or (202) 482–0410, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the administrative review.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results and received case and rebuttal briefs from interested parties.2 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018.3 On March 16, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results of this review until June 7, 2018.4 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. Imports of the product are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is 1 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016, 82 FR 57583 (December 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results). 2 See the case briefs from Wheatland Tube Company, Husteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel Company, and SeAH Steel Corporation, dated January 12, 2018, and the rebuttal briefs from Wheatland Tube Company, Husteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel Company, and SeAH Steel Corporation, dated January 19, 2018. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 16, 2018. E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1 27542 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2018 / Notices contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Disclosure Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/index.html. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we revised the preliminary margin calculations for the two mandatory respondents, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel). These revisions resulted in changes to the margins for Husteel, Hyundai Steel, and the three respondents not selected for individual examination for the final results of this review. Final Results of the Administrative Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents for the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. Producer/exporter AJU Besteel .......................... Husteel Co., Ltd .................... Hyundai Steel Company 6 .... NEXTEEL ............................. SeAH Steel Corporation ....... amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For Husteel and Hyundai Steel, we calculated importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of the sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced by Husteel or Hyundai Steel for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, AJU Besteel, NEXTEEL, and SeAH Steel Corporation, we will instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by these firms. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of these reviews. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of CWP from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by 19.28 section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 7.71 cash deposit rate for the companies 30.85 listed above will be equal to the 19.28 weighted-average dumping margins 19.28 established in these final results of administrative review; (2) for the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 2015–2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 6 In the initiation notice, we initiated reviews of both Hyundai HYSCO and Hyundai Steel Company, but stated that Hyundai Steel Company is the 18:01 Jun 12, 2018 Assessment Rates Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 5 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Jkt 244001 successor-in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 4294, 4296 (January 13, 2017). 7 In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer has been covered in a prior complete segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent,8 the all-others rate determined in the less-than-fair-value investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 8 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992). E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 13, 2018 / Notices Dated: June 7, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Particular Market Situation Comment 2: Additional Particular Market Situation Adjustments Comment 3: Allegations of Improper Political Influence Comment 4: Differential Pricing Comment 5: Universe of Sales (Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel)) Comment 6: Certain Grades Sold (Husteel) Comment 7: Universe of Sales (Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel)) Comment 8: Advertising Expenses (Hyundai Steel) Comment 9: Assessment Rates (Hyundai Steel) [FR Doc. 2018–12692 Filed 6–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Generic Clearance for Usability Data Collections National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 13, 2018. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Jun 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Maureen O’Reilly, Management Analyst, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 1710, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1710, telephone 301–975–3189, or via email to maureen.oreilly@ nist.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract In accordance with the Executive Order 12862, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory agency of the Department of Commerce, proposes to conduct a number of data collection efforts—both quantitative and qualitative. The data collections will be designed to determine requirements and evaluate the usability and utility of NIST research for measurement and standardization work. These data collections efforts may include, but may not be limited to electronic methodologies, empirical studies, video and audio collections, interviews, and questionnaires. For example, data collection efforts may include the cryptography software survey and the password generation study. NIST will limit its inquiries to data collections that solicit strictly voluntary opinions or responses. NIST will not conduct individual data collections under this generic clearance that are mandatory, required, or regulated. The data collected will be used to guide NIST research. NIST will take steps to ensure anonymity of respondents in each activity covered under this request. II. Method of Collection NIST will collect this information by electronic means when possible, as well as by mail, fax, telephone and personto-person interviews. If an information collection is conducted in person, NIST will provide the respondent with a paper copy of the collection instrument that displays the ‘‘notwithstanding statement’’, OMB Control # and current Expiration date. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0693–0043. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Revision and extension of a currently approved information collection. Affected Public: Individuals or households, State, local or tribal government, Federal government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 15,000. Estimated Time per Response: Varied, dependent upon the data collection method used. The estimated response time to complete a questionnaire is 15 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27543 minutes or 2 hours to participate in an empirical study. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,000. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0. IV. Request for Comments NIST invites comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Sheleen Dumas, Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2018–12694 Filed 6–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Manufacturing Extension Partnership Management Information Reporting National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 13, 2018. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27541-27543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-809]


Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
companies covered by this administrative review made sales of circular 
welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at 
less than normal value during the period of review (POR) November 1, 
2015, through October 31, 2016.

DATES: Applicable June 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2201 or (202) 482-
0410, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
the administrative review.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment 
on the Preliminary Results and received case and rebuttal briefs from 
interested parties.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic 
of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 57583 (December 6, 2017) (Preliminary 
Results).
    \2\ See the case briefs from Wheatland Tube Company, Husteel 
Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel Company, and SeAH Steel Corporation, dated 
January 12, 2018, and the rebuttal briefs from Wheatland Tube 
Company, Husteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel Company, and SeAH Steel 
Corporation, dated January 19, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by 
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 
2018.\3\ On March 16, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results of 
this review until June 7, 2018.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this 
segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 
the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 16, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy 
steel pipe and tube. Imports of the product are currently classifiable 
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under 
subheadings 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of 
the order is

[[Page 27542]]

contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See the Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular 
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 2015-2016,'' 
dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 
this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which 
is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is 
attached in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received, we revised the 
preliminary margin calculations for the two mandatory respondents, 
Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel). 
These revisions resulted in changes to the margins for Husteel, Hyundai 
Steel, and the three respondents not selected for individual 
examination for the final results of this review.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for the respondents for the period November 1, 2015, through 
October 31, 2016.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AJU Besteel.............................................           19.28
Husteel Co., Ltd........................................            7.71
Hyundai Steel Company \6\...............................           30.85
NEXTEEL.................................................           19.28
SeAH Steel Corporation..................................           19.28
------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In the initiation notice, we initiated reviews of both 
Hyundai HYSCO and Hyundai Steel Company, but stated that Hyundai 
Steel Company is the successor-in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO. See 
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews, 82 FR 4294, 4296 (January 13, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final 
results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.
    For Husteel and Hyundai Steel, we calculated importer-specific 
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
antidumping duties calculated for each importer's examined sales and 
the total entered value of the sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\7\ For entries of subject merchandise during the period 
of review produced by Husteel or Hyundai Steel for which it did not 
know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if 
there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate 
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in 
Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination, AJU Besteel, NEXTEEL, and SeAH Steel Corporation, we will 
instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject 
merchandise produced and/or exported by these firms. We intend to issue 
liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final 
results of these reviews.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of this notice for all shipments of CWP from Korea entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of 
publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 
cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margins established in these final results of 
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed 
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if 
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or 
the original investigation but the producer has been covered in a prior 
complete segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the 
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent,\8\ the all-others rate 
determined in the less-than-fair-value investigation. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular 
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea 
(Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy 
Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation 
subject to sanction.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).


[[Page 27543]]


    Dated: June 7, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination
Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Particular Market Situation
    Comment 2: Additional Particular Market Situation Adjustments
    Comment 3: Allegations of Improper Political Influence
    Comment 4: Differential Pricing
    Comment 5: Universe of Sales (Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel))
    Comment 6: Certain Grades Sold (Husteel)
    Comment 7: Universe of Sales (Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai 
Steel))
    Comment 8: Advertising Expenses (Hyundai Steel)
    Comment 9: Assessment Rates (Hyundai Steel)

[FR Doc. 2018-12692 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P