Certain Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Automobiles Containing the Same: Institution of investigation, 27349-27350 [2018-12609]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2018 / Notices the Interior NEPA implementing regulations. Additional information regarding the PR&Gs is available online at the website provided in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. Cooperating Agency Status If, based on the Proposed Action, your agency believes it has special expertise or jurisdiction by law, as defined in 40 CFR 1508.15 and 1508.26, please respond within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. Special Assistance for Public Scoping Meetings If special assistance is required at the scoping meetings, please contact Mr. Sean Heath at (623) 773–6250, or email your assistance needs to NMUnitEIS@ empsi.com, along with your name and telephone number. Please indicate your needs at least two weeks in advance of the meeting to enable Reclamation to secure the needed services. If a request cannot be honored, the requestor will be notified. Public Disclosure Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: June 7, 2018. Terrance J. Fulp, Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region. [FR Doc. 2018–12575 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4332–90–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1119] sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Certain Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Automobiles Containing the Same: Institution of investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 7, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Jun 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Broadcom Corporation of San Jose, California. Supplements to the complaint were filed on May 18, 2018 and May 30, 2018. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain infotainment systems, component thereof, and automobiles containing the same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,937,187 (‘‘the ’187 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,902,104 (‘‘the ’104 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,512,752 (‘‘the ’752 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,530,027 (‘‘the ’027 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,284,844 (‘‘the ’844 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,437,583 (‘‘the ’583 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, The Office of Docket Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). Scope of investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27349 International Trade Commission, on June 6, 2018, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–10 of the ’187 patent; claims 1, 2, 5–13, 15, and 16 of the ’104 patent; claims 1–10 of the ’752 patent; claims 11–20 of the ’027 patent; claims 1–14 of the ’844 patent; and claims 17–26 of the ’583 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘head units, rear seat entertainment units, units for displaying information or entertainment, and cameras, controllers, processing components, modules, chips, GNSS processing devices, and circuits used therein or therewith and automobiles that contain such infotainment systems and components’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Broadcom Corporation, 1320 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95131. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Toyota Motor Corporation, 1 Toyotacho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 471–8571, Japan Toyota Motor North America, Inc., 6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., 6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024 Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc., 4000 Tulip Tree Drive, Princeton, IN 47670 Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc., 25 Atlantic Avenue, Erlanger, KY 41018 Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc., 398 E Main Street, Tupelo, MS 38804 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 27350 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2018 / Notices sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, Inc., 1 Lone Star Pass, San Antonio, TX 78264 Panasonic Corporation, 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka 571– 8501, Japan Panasonic Corporation of North America, Two Riverfront Plaza, 828 McCarter Highway, Newark, NJ 07102 Denso Ten Limited, 2–28, Gosho-dori, 1chome, Hyogo-ku, Kobe City, Japan Denso Ten America Limited, 20100 Western Avenue, Torrance, CA 90501 Renesas Electronics Corporation, Toyosu Foresia 3–2–24 Toyosu, Kotoku, Tokyo 135–0061, Japan Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 1001 Murphy Ranch Road, Milpitas, CA 95035 Japan Radio Co., Ltd., Nakano Central Park East, 10–1, Nakano 4-chome, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164–8570, Japan (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be named as a party to this investigation. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Jun 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 Issued: June 7, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–12609 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Second Amended Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act On June 5, 2018, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Second Amended Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in the lawsuit entitled United States v. City of Akron, Ohio, et al., Civil Action No. 09–cv– 00272. In this action the United States, and the State of Ohio in a cross-claim, sought civil penalties and injunctive relief for violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in connection with the City of Akron’s (‘‘Akron’s’’ or ‘‘City’s’’) operation of its municipal wastewater treatment facility and sewer system. Under the Consent Decree, which was approved by the Court in January 2014, Akron was required to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to address overflows from its combined sewer system and bypasses around secondary treatment at the wastewater treatment facility. That plan, known as the ‘‘Long Term Control Plan Update’’ (‘‘LTCP Update’’), which was approved by the United States in November 2011 and the State of Ohio in April 2012, sets forth specific projects that the City is required to implement, and identifies dates for completion of these projects. The proposed amendment modifies provisions of the 2014 Consent Decree that are set forth in the City’s LTCP Update. Specifically, the proposed amendment would permit the City to install a different biologically enhanced high rate treatment technology to address remaining secondary bypasses at its wastewater treatment plant; the 2014 Consent Decree requires the City to use a BioActiflo system, whereas the proposed amendment would allow it to use a BioCEPT system instead. The proposed amendment also addresses requirements for four storage basins in the City’s sewer collection system. The City would increase the size of one of the storage basins, and would not be required to build the remaining basins. Instead, it would expand existing ‘‘underflow’’ pipes at those combined sewer overflow (‘‘CSO’’) locations, which would allow it to optimize flow, increasing the amount of wastewater PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 that it sends to the wastewater treatment plant. In addition, at three of the CSO locations, the City would install a variety of green infrastructure projects that are collectively capable of addressing specified volumes of stormwater. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Second Amended Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. City of Akron, Ohio, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–3144/2. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. By mail ......... During the public comment period, the Second Amendment to the Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/ consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of the proposed amendment to the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $7.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Randall M. Stone, Acting Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2018–12521 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Information Security Oversight Office [NARA–2018–042] State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS– PAC) National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27349-27350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1119]


Certain Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Automobiles 
Containing the Same: Institution of investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 7, 2018, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Broadcom 
Corporation of San Jose, California. Supplements to the complaint were 
filed on May 18, 2018 and May 30, 2018. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain infotainment systems, component thereof, 
and automobiles containing the same by reason of infringement of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,937,187 (``the '187 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,902,104 
(``the '104 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,512,752 (``the '752 patent''); 
U.S. Patent No. 7,530,027 (``the '027 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 
8,284,844 (``the '844 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,437,583 (``the 
'583 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the 
United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, The Office of Docket 
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
    Scope of investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 6, 2018, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of products identified 
in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-
10 of the '187 patent; claims 1, 2, 5-13, 15, and 16 of the '104 
patent; claims 1-10 of the '752 patent; claims 11-20 of the '027 
patent; claims 1-14 of the '844 patent; and claims 17-26 of the '583 
patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required 
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``head units, rear 
seat entertainment units, units for displaying information or 
entertainment, and cameras, controllers, processing components, 
modules, chips, GNSS processing devices, and circuits used therein or 
therewith and automobiles that contain such infotainment systems and 
components'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Broadcom Corporation, 1320 Ridder Park 
Drive, San Jose, CA 95131.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Toyota Motor Corporation, 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 
471-8571, Japan
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., 6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 
75024
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 
75024
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., 6565 
Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc., 4000 Tulip Tree Drive, 
Princeton, IN 47670
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc., 25 Atlantic Avenue, 
Erlanger, KY 41018
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc., 398 E Main Street, 
Tupelo, MS 38804

[[Page 27350]]

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, Inc., 1 Lone Star Pass, San Antonio, 
TX 78264
Panasonic Corporation, 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka 571-8501, 
Japan
Panasonic Corporation of North America, Two Riverfront Plaza, 828 
McCarter Highway, Newark, NJ 07102
Denso Ten Limited, 2-28, Gosho-dori, 1-chome, Hyogo-ku, Kobe City, 
Japan
Denso Ten America Limited, 20100 Western Avenue, Torrance, CA 90501
Renesas Electronics Corporation, Toyosu Foresia 3-2-24 Toyosu, Koto-ku, 
Tokyo 135-0061, Japan
Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 1001 Murphy Ranch Road, Milpitas, CA 
95035
Japan Radio Co., Ltd., Nakano Central Park East, 10-1, Nakano 4-chome, 
Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8570, Japan

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be named as a 
party to this investigation.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 7, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-12609 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P