BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc., et al., 27035-27042 [2018-12509]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices Register on May 3, 2018.3 The Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed rule change. Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides that within 45 days of the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change is June 17, 2018. The Commission is extending this 45day time period. The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,5 designates August 1, 2018 as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR–NYSEArca–2018–25). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.6 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–12433 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 33119; 812–14901] BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc., et al. June 6, 2018. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Notice of application pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’), seeking exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83122 (April 27, 2018), 83 FR 19578. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 Id. 6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 the 1940 Act and Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder. APPLICANTS: BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc., BlackRock Series Fund, Inc., BlackRock Variable Series Funds II, Inc., BlackRock Series Fund II, Inc. (each a ‘‘Company’’ and together, the ‘‘Companies’’), and BlackRock Advisors, LLC (‘‘BlackRock’’, and collectively with the Companies, the ‘‘Applicants’’). SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e– 2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in cases where a life insurance separate account supporting variable life insurance contracts, whether or not registered as an investment company with the Commission (‘‘VLI Accounts’’), holds shares of an existing portfolio of a Company that is designed to be sold to VLI Accounts or VA Accounts (as defined below) for which BlackRock or any of its affiliates may serve as investment adviser, sub-adviser, manager, administrator, principal underwriter or sponsor (‘‘Existing Fund’’) or ‘‘Future Fund’’ 1 (any Existing Fund or Future Fund is referred to herein as a ‘‘Fund’’ and collectively, the ‘‘Funds’’), and one or more of the following other types of investors also hold shares of the Funds: (i) Any life insurance company separate account supporting variable annuity contracts, whether or not registered as an investment company with the Commission (‘‘VA Accounts’’), and any VLI Account; (ii) trustees of qualified group pension or group retirement plans outside the separate account context (‘‘Qualified Plans’’); (iii) the investment adviser or any subadviser to a Fund or affiliated persons of the adviser or subadviser (representing seed money investments in a Fund) (‘‘Advisers’’); and (iv) any general account of an insurance company depositor of VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts (‘‘General Accounts’’). FILING DATE: The application was filed on April 27, 2018. HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the 1 As used herein, a ‘‘Future Fund’’ is any investment company (or investment portfolio or series thereof), other than an Existing Fund, designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts and to which BlackRock or its affiliates may in the future serve as investment adviser, subadviser, manager, administrator, principal underwriter or sponsor. PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27035 request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on July 2, 2018, and should be accompanied by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. Applicants: 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Shin, Attorney-Adviser, or Andrea Ottomanelli Magovern, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6762 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number, or for an applicant using the Company name box, at https:// www.sec.gov/search.htm, or by calling (202) 551–8090. Applicants’ Representations 1. BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. was organized as a Maryland corporation on October 16, 1981 and is registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811–3290). The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f–2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of twenty portfolios, all of which are managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’) on Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 002– 74452) to register such shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered to the general public. 2. BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. was organized as a Maryland corporation on September 4, 1980 and is registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811–3091). The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f–2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of thirteen E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 27036 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices portfolios, all of which are managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act on Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 002–69062) to register such shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered to the general public. 3. BlackRock Variable Series Funds II, Inc. was organized as a Maryland corporation on April 19, 2018 and is registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811–23346). The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f–2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of three newly-created portfolios, all of which are expected to be managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act on Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 333–224376) to register such shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered to the general public. 4. BlackRock Series Fund II, Inc. was organized as a Maryland corporation on April 19, 2018 and is registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811–23345). The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f–2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of two newlycreated portfolios, all of which are expected to be managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act on Form N–1A (Reg. File No. 333–224375) to register such shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered to the general public. 5. BlackRock currently serves or is expected to serve as the investment adviser to all of the existing portfolios of the Companies. It is anticipated that BlackRock will serve as the Adviser to all of the Future Funds, subject to the authority of the Future Fund’s board of directors/trustees. BlackRock is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the state of Delaware and is registered as an investment adviser VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘Advisers Act’’). 6. The Funds propose to, and other Funds may in the future propose to, offer and sell their shares to VLI and VA Accounts of affiliated and unaffiliated life insurance companies (‘‘Participating Insurance Companies’’) to serve as investment media to support variable life insurance contracts (‘‘VLI Contracts’’) and variable annuity contracts (‘‘VA Contacts’’) (VLI Contracts and VA Contracts together, ‘‘Variable Contracts’’) issued through such accounts respectively, VLI Accounts and VA Accounts (VLI Accounts and VA Accounts together, ‘‘Separate Accounts’’). Each Separate Account is or will be established as a segregated asset account by a Participating Insurance Company pursuant to the insurance law of the insurance company’s state of domicile. As of the date of this Application, the Participating Insurance Companies with respect to BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. are Transamerica Life Insurance Company, Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company and Monarch Life Insurance Company, and there are over fifty Participating Insurance Companies with respect to BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. As of the date of this Application, there are no Participating Insurance Companies with respect to the other two Companies, which are newly formed. 7. In the future, the Funds will sell their shares to Separate Accounts only if each Participating Insurance Company sponsoring such a Separate Account enters into a participation agreement with the Funds.1 The participation agreements define or will define the relationship between each Fund and each Participating Insurance Company and memorialize or will memorialize, among other matters, the fact that, except where the agreement specifically provides otherwise, the Participating Insurance Company will remain responsible for establishing and 1 Each Existing Fund of BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. and BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. and its respective Participating Insurance Companies will begin to rely on the requested order only when all of such Participating Insurance Companies have entered into participation agreements meeting the requirements of the order. Until then, each such Existing Fund and its respective Participating Insurance Companies may continue to rely upon one of the following two existing orders: (i) Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc., Rel. No. IC–19279 (Feb. 22, 1993) (notice), and Rel. No. IC–19346 (Mar. 23, 1993) (order), with respect to BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. (f/k/a Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc.); and (ii) Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company, Rel. No. IC–21312 (Aug. 17, 1995) (notice), and Rel. No. IC–21389 (Oct. 3, 1995) (order), with respect to BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. (f/k/a Merrill Lynch Variable Series Funds, Inc.). PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 maintaining any Separate Account covered by the agreement and for complying with all applicable requirements of state and federal law pertaining to such accounts and to the sale and distribution of Variable Contracts issued through such Separate Accounts. The role of the Funds under this arrangement, with regard to the federal securities laws, will consist of offering and selling shares of the Funds to the Separate Accounts and fulfilling any conditions that the Commission may impose in granting the requested order. 8. The use of a common management investment company (or investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for both VLI Accounts and VA Accounts of the same Participating Insurance Company, or of two or more insurance companies that are affiliated persons of each other, is referred to herein as ‘‘mixed funding.’’ The use of a common management investment company (or investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of two or more Participating Insurance Companies that are not affiliated persons of each other is referred to herein as ‘‘shared funding.’’ 9. Applicants propose that the Funds may sell their shares directly to Qualified Plans, Advisers, and a General Accounts of a Participating Insurance Company. 10. The use of a common management investment company (or investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for Separate Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts is referred to herein as ‘‘extended mixed funding.’’ Applicants’ Legal Analysis 1. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for any company to serve as an investment adviser or principal underwriter of any investment company, including a unit investment trust, if an affiliated person of that company is subject to disqualification enumerated in Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of the 1940 Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act have been deemed by the Commission to require ‘‘passthrough’’ voting with respect to an underlying investment company’s shares. 2. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e– 3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act provide partial exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act to VLI Accounts supporting certain VLI Contracts and to their life insurance company depositors under limited circumstances, as described in the application. VLI Accounts, their E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices depositors and their principal underwriters may not rely on the exemptions provided by Rule 6e– 2(b)(15) if shares of the Fund are held by a VLI Account through which flexible premium VLI Contracts are issued, a VLI Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, an unaffiliated Adviser, any VA Account, a Qualified Plan or a General Account. VLI Accounts, their depositors and their principal underwriters may not rely on the exemptions provided by Rule 6e– 3(T)(b)(15) if Shares of a Fund are held by a VLI Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, a VA Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, a Qualified Plan, an unaffiliated investment adviser or the General Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, Applicants request an order of the Commission granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder in cases where a scheduled or flexible premium VLI Account holds shares of a Fund and one or more of the following types of investors also hold Shares of the Funds: (i) VA Accounts and VLI Accounts (supporting scheduled premium or flexible premium VLI Contracts) of affiliated and unaffiliated Participating Insurance Companies; (ii) Qualified Plans; (iii) Advisers; and/or (iv) General Accounts. 3. Applicants maintain that there is no policy reason for the sale of Fund Shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts to prohibit or otherwise limit a Participating Insurance Company from relying on the relief provided by Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15). Nonetheless, Rule 6e–2 and Rule 6e–3(T) each specifically provides that the relief granted thereunder is available only where shares of the underlying fund are offered exclusively to insurance company separate accounts. In this regard, Applicants request exemptive relief to the extent necessary to permit shares of the Funds to be sold to Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts while allowing Participating Insurance Companies and their Separate Accounts to enjoy the benefits of the relief granted under Rule 6e–2(b)(15) and Rule 6e- 3(T)(b)(15). Applicants note that if the Funds were to sell their shares only to Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e–2 and Rule 6e–3(T) would not be necessary. The relief provided for under Rule 6e– 2(b)(15) and Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts or to a registered VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:32 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 investment company’s ability to sell its shares to such purchasers. 4. Applicants are not aware of any reason for excluding separate accounts and investment companies engaged in shared funding from the exemptive relief provided under Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15), or for excluding separate accounts and investment companies engaged in mixed funding from the exemptive relief provided under Rule 6e–2(b)(15). Similarly, Applicants are not aware of any reason for excluding Participating Insurance Companies from the exemptive relief requested because the Funds may also sell their shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts. Rather, Applicants submit that the proposed sale of shares of the Funds to these purchasers may allow for the development of larger pools of assets resulting in the potential for greater investment and diversification opportunities, and for decreased expenses at higher asset levels resulting in greater cost efficiencies. 5. For the reasons explained below, Applicants have concluded that investment by Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts in the Funds should not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts between owners of VLI Contracts and other types of investors or between owners of VLI Contracts issued by unaffiliated Participating Insurance Companies. 6. Consistent with the Commission’s authority under Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act to grant exemptive orders to a class or classes of persons and transactions, Applicants request exemptions for a class consisting of Participating Insurance Companies and their separate accounts investing in Existing and Future Funds of the Company, as well as their principal underwriters. 7. Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act provides, in part, that the Commission, by order upon application, may conditionally or unconditionally exempt any person, security or transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities or transactions, from any provision or provisions of the 1940 Act, or any rule or regulation thereunder, if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act. Applicants submit that the exemptions requested are appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act. PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27037 8. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act provides, among other things, that it is unlawful for any company to serve as investment adviser or principal underwriter of any registered open- end investment company if an affiliated person of that company is subject to a disqualification enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(i) and (ii) and Rules 6e–3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the 1940 Act provide exemptions from Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, subject to the limitations discussed above on mixed funding, extended mixed funding and shared funding. These exemptions limit the application of the eligibility restrictions to affiliated individuals or companies that directly participate in management or administration of the underlying investment company. 9. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e– 3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940 Act provide exemptions from pass-through voting requirements with respect to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on mixed funding, extended mixed funding and shared funding are observed. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of its variable life insurance contract owners with respect to the investments of an underlying investment company, or any contract between such an investment company and its investment adviser, when required to do so by an insurance regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e–2 and 6e-3(T)). Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e– 3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that an insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of owners of its variable life insurance contracts if such owners initiate any change in an underlying investment company’s investment policies, principal underwriter or any investment adviser (provided that disregarding such voting instructions is reasonable and subject to the other provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B) and (b)(7)(ii)(C) of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)). 10. Applicants represent that the sale of Fund shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts will not have any impact on the exemptions requested herein regarding the disregard of pass-through voting rights. Shares sold to Qualified Plans will be held by such Qualified Plans. The exercise of voting rights by Qualified Plans, whether by trustees, participants, beneficiaries, or investment managers engaged by the Qualified Plans, does not raise the type of issues respecting disregard of voting rights that are raised E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 27038 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices by VLI Accounts. With respect to Qualified Plans, which are not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, there is no requirement to pass through voting rights to Qualified Plan participants. Indeed, to the contrary, applicable law expressly reserves voting rights associated with Qualified Plan assets to certain specified persons. 11. Similarly, Advisers and General Accounts are not subject to any passthrough voting rights. Accordingly, unlike the circumstances surrounding Separate Account investments in shares of the Funds, the issue of the resolution of any material irreconcilable conflicts with respect to voting is not present with respect to Advisers or General Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies. 12. Applicants recognize that the prohibitions on mixed and shared funding might reflect concern regarding possible different investment motivations among investors. When Rule 6e–2 was first adopted, variable annuity separate accounts could invest in mutual funds whose shares were also offered to the general public. However, now, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the ‘‘Code’’), any underlying fund, including the Funds, that sells shares to a VLI Account or a VA Account, would, in effect, be precluded from also selling its shares to the public. Consequently, the Funds may not sell their shares to the public. 13. Applicants assert that the rights of an insurance company on its own initiative or on instructions from a state insurance regulator to disregard the voting instructions of owners of Variable Contracts is not inconsistent with either mixed funding or shared funding. Applicants state that The National Association of Insurance Commissioners Variable Life Insurance Model Regulation suggests that it is unlikely that insurance regulators would find an underlying fund’s investment policy, investment adviser or principal underwriter objectionable for one type of Variable Contract but not another type. 14. Applicants assert that shared funding by unaffiliated insurance companies does not present any issues that do not already exist where a single insurance company is licensed to do business in several or all states. A particular state insurance regulator could require action that is inconsistent with the requirements of other states in which the insurance company offers its contracts. However, the fact that different insurers may be domiciled in different states does not create a significantly different or VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 enlarged problem. Shared funding by unaffiliated insurers, in this respect, is no different than the use of the same investment company as the funding vehicle for affiliated insurers, which Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) permit. Affiliated insurers may be domiciled in different states and be subject to differing state law requirements. Affiliation does not reduce the potential, if any exists, for differences in state regulatory requirements. Applicants state that in any event, the conditions set forth below are designed to safeguard against, and provide procedures for resolving, any adverse effects that differences among state regulatory requirements may produce. If a particular state insurance regulator’s decision conflicts with the majority of other state regulators, then the affected Participating Insurance Company will be required to withdraw its separate account investments in the relevant Fund. This requirement will be provided for in the participation agreement that will be entered into by Participating Insurance Companies with the relevant Fund. 15. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e– 3(T)(b)(15) give Participating Insurance Companies the right to disregard the voting instructions of VLI Contract owners in certain circumstances. This right derives from the authority of state insurance regulators over Separate Accounts. Under Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15), a Participating Insurance Company may disregard VLI Contract owner voting instructions only with respect to certain specified items. Affiliation does not eliminate the potential, if any exists, for divergent judgments as to the advisability or legality of a change in investment policies, principal underwriter or investment adviser initiated by such Contract owners. The potential for disagreement is limited by the requirements in Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T) that the Participating Insurance Company’s disregard of voting instructions be reasonable and based on specific good faith determinations. 16. A particular Participating Insurance Company’s disregard of voting instructions, nevertheless, could conflict with the voting instructions of a majority of VLI Contract owners. The Participating Insurance Company’s action possibly could be different than the determination of all or some of the other Participating Insurance Companies (including affiliated insurers) that the voting instructions of VLI Contract owners should prevail, and either could preclude a majority vote approving the change or could represent PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 a minority view. If the Participating Insurance Company’s judgment represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating Insurance Company may be required, at the relevant Fund’s election, to withdraw its Separate Accounts’ investments in the relevant Fund. No charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. This requirement will be provided for in the participation agreement entered into by the Participating Insurance Companies with the relevant Fund. 17. Applicants assert there is no reason why the investment policies of a Fund would or should be materially different from what these policies would or should be if the Fund supported only VA Accounts or VLI Accounts supporting flexible premium or scheduled premium VLI Contracts. Each type of insurance contract is designed as a long-term investment program. 18. Each Fund will be managed to attempt to achieve its specified investment objective, and not favor or disfavor any particular Participating Insurance Company or type of insurance contract. Applicants assert there is no reason to believe that different features of various types of Variable Contracts will lead to different investment policies for each or for different Separate Accounts. The sale of Variable Contracts and ultimate success of all Separate Accounts depends, at least in part, on satisfactory investment performance, which provides an incentive for each Participating Insurance Company to seek optimal investment performance. 19. Furthermore, no single investment strategy can be identified as appropriate to a particular Variable Contract. Each ‘‘pool’’ of VLI Contract and VA Contract owners is composed of individuals of diverse financial status, age, insurance needs and investment goals. A Fund supporting even one type of Variable Contract must accommodate these diverse factors in order to attract and retain purchasers. Permitting mixed and shared funding will provide economic support for the continuation of the Funds. Applicants state further that mixed and shared funding will broaden the base of potential Variable Contract owner investors, which may facilitate the establishment of additional Funds serving diverse goals. 20. Applicants do not believe that the sale of the shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts will increase the potential for material irreconcilable conflicts of interest between or among different types of investors. In particular, Applicants see E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices very little potential for such conflicts beyond those that would otherwise exist between owners of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts. Applicants submit that either there are no conflicts of interest or that there exists the ability by the affected parties to resolve such conflicts consistent with the best interests of VLI Contract owners, VA Contract owners and Qualified Plan participants. 21. Applicants state they considered whether there are any issues raised under the Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue Rulings thereunder, if Qualified Plans, Separate Accounts, Advisers and General Accounts all invest in the same Fund. Applicants have concluded that neither the Code, nor the Treasury Regulations nor Revenue Rulings thereunder present any inherent conflicts of interest if Qualified Plans, Advisers, General Accounts, and Separate Accounts all invest in the same Fund. 22. Applicants note that, while there are differences in the manner in which distributions from separate accounts and Qualified Plans are taxed, these differences have no impact on the Funds. When distributions are to be made, and a separate account or Qualified Plan is unable to net purchase payments to make distributions, the separate account or Qualified Plan will redeem shares of the relevant Fund at its net asset values in conformity with Rule 22c–1 under the 1940 Act (without the imposition of any sales charge) to provide proceeds to meet distribution needs. A Participating Insurance Company will then make distributions in accordance with the terms of its Variable Contracts, and a Qualified Plan will then make distributions in accordance with the terms of the Qualified Plan. 23. Applicants state that they considered whether it is possible to provide an equitable means of giving voting rights to Variable Contract owners, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts. In connection with any meeting of Fund shareholders, the Fund or its transfer agent will inform each Participating Insurance Company (with respect to its Separate Accounts and General Account), Adviser, and Qualified Plan of its share holdings and provide other information necessary for such shareholders to participate in the meeting (e.g., proxy materials). Each Participating Insurance Company then will solicit voting instructions from owners of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts in accordance with Rules 6e– 2 or 6e–3(T), or Section 12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) of the 1940 Act, as applicable, and its participation agreement with the relevant Fund. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 Shares of a Fund that are held by an Adviser or a General Account will generally be in the same proportion as all votes cast on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights. However, an Adviser or General Account will vote its shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or its staff. Shares held by Qualified Plans will be voted in accordance with applicable law. The voting rights provided to Qualified Plans with respect to the shares would be no different from the voting rights that are provided to Qualified Plans with respect to shares of mutual funds sold to the general public. Furthermore, if a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a Qualified Plan’s decision to disregard Qualified Plan participant voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the Qualified Plan may be required, at the election of the relevant Fund, to withdraw its investment in the Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. 24. Applicants do not believe that the ability of a Fund to sell its shares to a Qualified Plan, Adviser or General Account gives rise to a ‘‘senior security’’ as defined by Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act. Regardless of the rights and benefits of participants under Qualified Plans or owners of Variable Contracts; Separate Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts only have, or will only have, rights with respect to their respective shares of a Fund. These parties can only redeem such shares at net asset value. No shareholder of a Fund has any preference over any other shareholder with respect to distribution of assets or payment of dividends. 25. Applicants do not believe that the veto power of state insurance commissioners over certain potential changes to Fund investment objectives approved by Variable Contract owners creates conflicts between the interests of such owners and the interests of Qualified Plan participants, Advisers or General Accounts. Applicants note that a basic premise of corporate democracy and shareholder voting is that not all shareholders may agree with a particular proposal. Their interests and opinions may differ, but this does not mean that inherent conflicts of interest exist between or among such shareholders or that occasional conflicts of interest that do occur between or among them are likely to be irreconcilable. 26. Although Participating Insurance Companies may have to overcome PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27039 regulatory impediments in redeeming shares of a Fund held by their Separate Accounts, Applicants state that the Qualified Plans and participants in participant-directed Qualified Plans can make decisions quickly and redeem their shares in a Fund and reinvest in another investment company or other funding vehicle without impediments, or as is the case with most Qualified Plans, hold cash pending suitable investment. As a result, conflicts between the interests of Variable Contract owners and the interests of Qualified Plans and Qualified Plan participants can usually be resolved quickly since the Qualified Plans can, on their own, redeem their Fund shares. Advisers and General accounts can similarly redeem their shares of a Fund and make alternative investments at any time. 27. Finally, Applicants considered whether there is a potential for future conflicts of interest between Participating Insurance Companies and Qualified Plans created by future changes in the tax laws. Applicants do not see any greater potential for material irreconcilable conflicts arising between the interests of Variable Contract owners and Qualified Plan participants from future changes in the federal tax laws than that which already exists between VLI Contract owners and VA Contract owners. 28. Applicants recognize that the foregoing is not an all-inclusive list, but rather is representative of issues that they believe are relevant to the Application. Applicants believe that the sale of Fund shares to Qualified Plans would not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts between the interests of Qualified Plan participants and Variable Contract owners or other investors. Further, Applicants submit that the use of the Funds with respect to Qualified Plans is not substantially dissimilar from each Fund’s current and anticipated use, in that Qualified Plans, like separate accounts, are generally long-term investors. 29. Applicants assert that permitting a Fund to sell its shares to an Adviser or to the General Account of a Participating Insurance Company will enhance management of each Fund without raising significant concerns regarding material irreconcilable conflicts among different types of investors. 30. Applicants assert that various factors have limited the number of insurance companies that offer Variable Contracts. These factors include the costs of organizing and operating a funding vehicle, certain insurers’ lack of experience with respect to investment E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 27040 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices management, and the lack of name recognition by the public of certain insurance companies as investment experts. In particular, some smaller life insurance companies may not find it economically feasible, or within their investment or administrative expertise, to enter the Variable Contract business on their own. Applicants state that use of a Fund as a common investment vehicle for Variable Contracts would reduce or eliminate these concerns. Mixed and shared funding should also provide several benefits to owners of Variable Contracts by eliminating a significant portion of the costs of establishing and administering separate underlying funds. 31. Applicants state that the Participating Insurance Companies will benefit not only from the investment and administrative expertise of the Funds’ Adviser, but also from the potential cost efficiencies and investment flexibility afforded by larger pools of funds. Therefore, making the Funds available for mixed and shared funding will encourage more insurance companies to offer Variable Contracts. This should result in increased competition with respect to both Variable Contract design and pricing, which can in turn be expected to result in more product variety. Applicants also assert that sale of shares in a Fund to Qualified Plans, in addition to Separate Accounts, will result in an increased amount of assets available for investment in Fund. 32. Applicants also submit that, regardless of the type of shareholder in a Fund, an Adviser is or would be contractually and otherwise obligated to manage the Fund solely and exclusively in accordance with the Fund’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions, as well as any guidelines established by the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the ‘‘Board’’). 33. Applicants assert that sales of Fund shares, as described above, will not have any adverse federal income tax consequences to other investors in such Fund. 34. Applicants assert that granting the exemptions requested herein is in the public interest and, as discussed above, will not compromise the regulatory purposes of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), or 15(b) of the 1940 Act or Rules 6e–2 or 6e–3(T) thereunder. In addition, Applicants submit that the exemptions requested are consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 Applicants’ Conditions Applicants agree that the Commission order requested herein shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A majority of the Board of each Fund will consist of persons who are not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Fund, as defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, and as modified by any applicable orders of the Commission, except that if this condition is not met by reason of death, disqualification or bona fide resignation of any director/trustee or directors/ trustees, then the operation of this condition will be suspended: (a) For a period of 90 days if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled by the Board; (b) for a period of 150 days if a vote of shareholders is required to fill the vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for such longer period as the Commission may prescribe by order upon application, or by future rule. 2. The Board will monitor a Fund for the existence of any material irreconcilable conflict between and among the interests of the owners of all VLI Contracts and VA Contracts and participants of all Qualified Plans investing in the Fund, and determine what action, if any, should be taken in response to such conflicts. A material irreconcilable conflict may arise for a variety of reasons, including: (a) An action by any state insurance regulatory authority; (b) a change in applicable federal or state insurance, tax, or securities laws or regulations, or a public ruling, private letter ruling, noaction or interpretive letter, or any similar action by insurance, tax or securities regulatory authorities; (c) an administrative or judicial decision in any relevant proceeding; (d) the manner in which the investments of the Fund are being managed; (e) a difference in voting instructions given by VA Contract owners, VLI Contract owners, and Qualified Plans or Qualified Plan participants; (f) a decision by a Participating Insurance Company to disregard the voting instructions of contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a decision by a Qualified Plan to disregard the voting instructions of Qualified Plan participants. 3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well as by virtue of any investment of General Account assets in a Fund), any Advisers, and any Qualified Plan that executes a participation agreement upon its becoming an owner of 10% or more of the net assets of a Fund (collectively, ‘‘Participants’’) will report any potential or existing conflicts to the Board. Each Participant will be responsible for PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 assisting the Board in carrying out the Board’s responsibilities under these conditions by providing the Board with all information reasonably necessary for the Board to consider any issues raised. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an obligation by each Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board whenever Variable Contract owner voting instructions are disregarded, and, if pass-through voting is applicable, an obligation by each trustee for a Qualified Plan to inform the Board whenever it has determined to disregard Qualified Plan participant voting instructions. The responsibility to report such information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, will be a contractual obligation of all Participating Insurance Companies under their participation agreement with a Fund, and these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the interests of the Variable Contract owners. The responsibility to report such information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, also will be contractual obligations of all Qualified Plans under their participation agreement with a Fund, and such agreements will provide that these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the interests of Qualified Plan participants. 4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board, or a majority of the disinterested directors/trustees of the Board, that a material irreconcilable conflict exists, then the relevant Participant will, at its expense and to the extent reasonably practicable (as determined by a majority of the disinterested directors/trustees), take whatever steps are necessary to remedy or eliminate the material irreconcilable conflict, up to and including: (a) Withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of their VLI Accounts or VA Accounts from the relevant Fund and reinvesting such assets in a different investment vehicle, including another Fund; (b) in the case of a Participating Insurance Company, submitting the question as to whether such segregation should be implemented to a vote of all affected Variable Contract owners and, as appropriate, segregating the assets of any appropriate group (i.e., VA Contract owners or VLI Contact owners of one or more Participating Insurance Companies) that votes in favor of such segregation, or offering to the affected Variable Contract owners the option of making such a change; (c) withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of the Qualified Plans from the affected Fund and reinvesting them in a different investment medium; and (d) establishing a new registered E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices management investment company or managed separate account. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a decision by a Participating Insurance Company to disregard Variable Contract owner voting instructions, and that decision represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating Insurance Company may be required, at the election of the Fund, to withdraw such Participating Insurance Company’s Separate Account investments in a Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a Qualified Plan’s decision to disregard Qualified Plan participant voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the Qualified Plan may be required, at the election of the Fund, to withdraw its investment in a Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. The responsibility to take remedial action in the event of a Board determination of a material irreconcilable conflict and to bear the cost of such remedial action will be a contractual obligation of all Participants under their participation agreement with a Fund, and these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the interests of Variable Contract owners or, as applicable, Qualified Plan participants. For purposes of this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested directors/ trustees of the Board of a Fund will determine whether or not any proposed action adequately remedies any material irreconcilable conflict, but, in no event, will the Fund or its investment adviser be required to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract or Qualified Plan. No Participating Insurance Company will be required by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract if any offer to do so has been declined by vote of a majority of the Variable Contract owners materially and adversely affected by the material irreconcilable conflict. Further, no Qualified Plan will be required by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for the Qualified Plan if: (a) A majority of the Qualified Plan participants materially and adversely affected by the irreconcilable material conflict vote to decline such offer, or (b) pursuant to documents governing the Qualified Plan, the Qualified Plan trustee makes such decision without a Qualified Plan participant vote. 5. The determination by the Board of the existence of a material irreconcilable conflict and its implications will be VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 made known in writing promptly to all Participants. 6. Participating Insurance Companies will provide pass-through voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners whose Variable Contracts are issued through registered Separate Accounts for as long as the Commission continues to interpret the 1940 Act as requiring such pass-through voting privileges. However, as to Variable Contracts issued through Separate Accounts not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, passthrough voting privileges will be extended to owners of such Variable Contracts to the extent granted by the Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, such Participating Insurance Companies, where applicable, will vote the shares of each Fund held in their Separate Accounts in a manner consistent with voting instructions timely received from Variable Contract owners. Participating Insurance Companies will be responsible for assuring that each of their Separate Accounts investing in a Fund calculates voting privileges in a manner consistent with all other Participating Insurance Companies investing in that Fund. The obligation to calculate voting privileges as provided in the Application shall be a contractual obligation of all Participating Insurance Companies under their participation agreement with the Fund. Each Participating Insurance Company will vote shares of each Fund held in its Separate Accounts for which no timely voting instructions are received, as well as shares held in its General Account or otherwise attributed to it, in the same proportion as those shares for which voting instructions are received. Each Qualified Plan will vote as required by applicable law, governing Qualified Plan documents and as provided in the Application. 7. As long as the Commission continues to interpret the 1940 Act as requiring that pass-through voting privileges be provided to Variable Contract owners, a Fund Adviser or any General Account will vote its respective shares of a Fund in the same proportion as all votes cast on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights; provided, however, that such an Adviser or General Account shall vote its shares in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or its staff. 8. Each Fund will comply with all provisions of the 1940 Act requiring voting by shareholders (which, for these purposes, shall be the persons having a voting interest in its shares), and, in particular, the Fund will either provide PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27041 for annual meetings (except to the extent that the Commission may interpret Section 16 of the 1940 Act not to require such meetings) or comply with Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act (although each Fund is not, or will not be, one of those trusts of the type described in Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act), as well as with Section 16(a) of the 1940 Act and, if and when applicable, Section 16(b) of the 1940 Act. Further, each Fund will act in accordance with the Commission’s interpretations of the requirements of Section 16(a) with respect to periodic elections of directors/trustees and with whatever rules the Commission may promulgate thereunder. 9. A Fund will make its shares available to the VLI Accounts, VA Accounts, and Qualified Plans at or about the time it accepts any seed capital from its Adviser or from the General Account of a Participating Insurance Company. 10. Each Fund has notified, or will notify, all Participants that disclosure regarding potential risks of mixed and shared funding may be appropriate in VA Account and VLI Account Prospectuses or Qualified Plan documents. Each Fund will disclose, in its prospectus that: (a) Shares of the Fund may be offered to both VA Accounts and VLI Accounts and, if applicable, to Qualified Plans; (b) due to differences in tax treatment and other considerations, the interests of various Variable Contract owners participating in the Fund and the interests of Qualified Plan participants investing in the Fund, if applicable, may conflict; and (c) the Fund’s Board will monitor events in order to identify the existence of any material irreconcilable conflicts and to determine what action, if any, should be taken in response to any such conflicts. 11. If and to the extent Rule 6e–2 and Rule 6e–3(T) under the 1940 Act are amended, or proposed Rule 6e–3 under the 1940 Act is adopted, to provide exemptive relief from any provision of the 1940 Act, or the rules thereunder, with respect to mixed or shared funding, on terms and conditions materially different from any exemptions granted in the order requested in the Application, then each Fund and/or Participating Insurance Companies, as appropriate, shall take such steps as may be necessary to comply with Rules 6e–2 or 6e–3(T), as amended, or Rule 6e–3, to the extent such rules are applicable. 12. Each Participant, at least annually, shall submit to the Board of each Fund such reports, materials or data as the Board reasonably may request so that E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 27042 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Notices the directors/trustees may fully carry out the obligations imposed upon the Board by the conditions contained in the Application. Such reports, materials and data shall be submitted more frequently if deemed appropriate by the Board. The obligations of the Participants to provide these reports, materials and data to the Board, when it so reasonably requests, shall be a contractual obligation of all Participants under their participation agreement with the Fund. 13. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by a Board, and all Board action with regard to determining the existence of a conflict, notifying Participants of a conflict and determining whether any proposed action adequately remedies a conflict, will be properly recorded in the minutes of the Board or other appropriate records, and such minutes or other records shall be made available to the Commission upon request. 14. Each Fund will not accept a purchase order from a Qualified Plan if such purchase would make the Qualified Plan an owner of 10 percent or more of the assets of a Fund unless the Qualified Plan executes an agreement with the Fund governing participation in the Fund that includes the conditions set forth herein to the extent applicable. A Qualified Plan will execute an application containing an acknowledgement of this condition at the time of its initial purchase of shares. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated authority. Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–12509 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [SEC File No. 270–789, OMB Control No. 3235–0371] daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Generic ICR: Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery Upon Written Request Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736 Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. The information collection activity will garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration’s commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the SEC and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. Feedback collected under this generic clearance will provide useful information, but it will not yield data that can be generalized to the overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative information will not be used for quantitative information collections that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely to have, such collections may still be eligible for submission for other generic mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative results. Below is the projected average estimates for the next three years: Expected Annual Number of Activities: [10]. Respondents: [20,000]. Annual Responses: [20,000]. Frequency of Response: Once per request. Average Minutes per Response: [10]. Burden Hours: [3500]. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email to: PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: June 5, 2018. Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–12434 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–83381; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2018–38] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Index Methodology Applicable to Indexes Underlying iShares California AMTFree Muni Bond ETF and iShares New York AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF June 5, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on May 21, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes changes relating to the index methodology applicable to the indexes underlying 1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2 15 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27035-27042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33119; 812-14901]


BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc., et al.

June 6, 2018.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of application pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act''), seeking exemptions 
from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and Rules 
6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.

Applicants:  BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc., BlackRock Series 
Fund, Inc., BlackRock Variable Series Funds II, Inc., BlackRock Series 
Fund II, Inc. (each a ``Company'' and together, the ``Companies''), and 
BlackRock Advisors, LLC (``BlackRock'', and collectively with the 
Companies, the ``Applicants'').

Summary of Application:  Applicants request an order granting 
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act 
and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in cases where a 
life insurance separate account supporting variable life insurance 
contracts, whether or not registered as an investment company with the 
Commission (``VLI Accounts''), holds shares of an existing portfolio of 
a Company that is designed to be sold to VLI Accounts or VA Accounts 
(as defined below) for which BlackRock or any of its affiliates may 
serve as investment adviser, sub-adviser, manager, administrator, 
principal underwriter or sponsor (``Existing Fund'') or ``Future Fund'' 
\1\ (any Existing Fund or Future Fund is referred to herein as a 
``Fund'' and collectively, the ``Funds''), and one or more of the 
following other types of investors also hold shares of the Funds: (i) 
Any life insurance company separate account supporting variable annuity 
contracts, whether or not registered as an investment company with the 
Commission (``VA Accounts''), and any VLI Account; (ii) trustees of 
qualified group pension or group retirement plans outside the separate 
account context (``Qualified Plans''); (iii) the investment adviser or 
any subadviser to a Fund or affiliated persons of the adviser or 
subadviser (representing seed money investments in a Fund) 
(``Advisers''); and (iv) any general account of an insurance company 
depositor of VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts (``General Accounts'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ As used herein, a ``Future Fund'' is any investment company 
(or investment portfolio or series thereof), other than an Existing 
Fund, designed to be sold to VA Accounts and/or VLI Accounts and to 
which BlackRock or its affiliates may in the future serve as 
investment adviser, sub-adviser, manager, administrator, principal 
underwriter or sponsor.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Date:  The application was filed on April 27, 2018.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing:  An order granting the application 
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested 
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of the 
Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, 
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the 
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on July 2, 2018, and should be accompanied by 
proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for 
lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the 
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the 
issues contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by 
writing to the Secretary of the Commission.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street 
NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: 55 East 52nd Street, New 
York, NY 10055.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Shin, Attorney-Adviser, or 
Andrea Ottomanelli Magovern, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6762 (Division 
of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained via the 
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an 
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search.htm, 
or by calling (202) 551-8090.

Applicants' Representations

    1. BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. was organized as a 
Maryland corporation on October 16, 1981 and is registered under the 
1940 Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 
811-3290). The Company is a series investment company as defined by 
Rule 18f-2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of twenty 
portfolios, all of which are managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a 
separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios 
and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 
1933, as amended (the ``Securities Act'') on Form N-1A (Reg. File No. 
002-74452) to register such shares. The Company may establish 
additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of shares 
for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not 
and will not be offered to the general public.
    2. BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. was organized as a Maryland 
corporation on September 4, 1980 and is registered under the 1940 Act 
as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-3091). 
The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 
under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of thirteen

[[Page 27036]]

portfolios, all of which are managed by BlackRock. The Company issues a 
separate series of shares of common stock for each of its portfolios 
and has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act on Form 
N-1A (Reg. File No. 002-69062) to register such shares. The Company may 
establish additional portfolios in the future and additional classes of 
shares for such portfolios. Shares of the portfolios of the Company are 
not and will not be offered to the general public.
    3. BlackRock Variable Series Funds II, Inc. was organized as a 
Maryland corporation on April 19, 2018 and is registered under the 1940 
Act as an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-
23346). The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 
18f-2 under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of three newly-
created portfolios, all of which are expected to be managed by 
BlackRock. The Company issues a separate series of shares of common 
stock for each of its portfolios and has filed a registration statement 
under the Securities Act on Form N-1A (Reg. File No. 333-224376) to 
register such shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios 
in the future and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. 
Shares of the portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered 
to the general public.
    4. BlackRock Series Fund II, Inc. was organized as a Maryland 
corporation on April 19, 2018 and is registered under the 1940 Act as 
an open-end management investment company (Reg. File No. 811-23345). 
The Company is a series investment company as defined by Rule 18f-2 
under the 1940 Act and is currently comprised of two newly-created 
portfolios, all of which are expected to be managed by BlackRock. The 
Company issues a separate series of shares of common stock for each of 
its portfolios and has filed a registration statement under the 
Securities Act on Form N-1A (Reg. File No. 333-224375) to register such 
shares. The Company may establish additional portfolios in the future 
and additional classes of shares for such portfolios. Shares of the 
portfolios of the Company are not and will not be offered to the 
general public.
    5. BlackRock currently serves or is expected to serve as the 
investment adviser to all of the existing portfolios of the Companies. 
It is anticipated that BlackRock will serve as the Adviser to all of 
the Future Funds, subject to the authority of the Future Fund's board 
of directors/trustees. BlackRock is a limited liability company formed 
under the laws of the state of Delaware and is registered as an 
investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as 
amended (the ``Advisers Act'').
    6. The Funds propose to, and other Funds may in the future propose 
to, offer and sell their shares to VLI and VA Accounts of affiliated 
and unaffiliated life insurance companies (``Participating Insurance 
Companies'') to serve as investment media to support variable life 
insurance contracts (``VLI Contracts'') and variable annuity contracts 
(``VA Contacts'') (VLI Contracts and VA Contracts together, ``Variable 
Contracts'') issued through such accounts respectively, VLI Accounts 
and VA Accounts (VLI Accounts and VA Accounts together,
    ``Separate Accounts''). Each Separate Account is or will be 
established as a segregated asset account by a Participating Insurance 
Company pursuant to the insurance law of the insurance company's state 
of domicile. As of the date of this Application, the Participating 
Insurance Companies with respect to BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. are 
Transamerica Life Insurance Company, Transamerica Financial Life 
Insurance Company and Monarch Life Insurance Company, and there are 
over fifty Participating Insurance Companies with respect to BlackRock 
Variable Series Funds, Inc. As of the date of this Application, there 
are no Participating Insurance Companies with respect to the other two 
Companies, which are newly formed.
    7. In the future, the Funds will sell their shares to Separate 
Accounts only if each Participating Insurance Company sponsoring such a 
Separate Account enters into a participation agreement with the 
Funds.\1\ The participation agreements define or will define the 
relationship between each Fund and each Participating Insurance Company 
and memorialize or will memorialize, among other matters, the fact 
that, except where the agreement specifically provides otherwise, the 
Participating Insurance Company will remain responsible for 
establishing and maintaining any Separate Account covered by the 
agreement and for complying with all applicable requirements of state 
and federal law pertaining to such accounts and to the sale and 
distribution of Variable Contracts issued through such Separate 
Accounts. The role of the Funds under this arrangement, with regard to 
the federal securities laws, will consist of offering and selling 
shares of the Funds to the Separate Accounts and fulfilling any 
conditions that the Commission may impose in granting the requested 
order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Each Existing Fund of BlackRock Variable Series Funds, Inc. 
and BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. and its respective Participating 
Insurance Companies will begin to rely on the requested order only 
when all of such Participating Insurance Companies have entered into 
participation agreements meeting the requirements of the order. 
Until then, each such Existing Fund and its respective Participating 
Insurance Companies may continue to rely upon one of the following 
two existing orders: (i) Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc., Rel. No. 
IC-19279 (Feb. 22, 1993) (notice), and Rel. No. IC-19346 (Mar. 23, 
1993) (order), with respect to BlackRock Series Fund, Inc. (f/k/a 
Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc.); and (ii) Merrill Lynch Life 
Insurance Company, Rel. No. IC-21312 (Aug. 17, 1995) (notice), and 
Rel. No. IC-21389 (Oct. 3, 1995) (order), with respect to BlackRock 
Variable Series Funds, Inc. (f/k/a Merrill Lynch Variable Series 
Funds, Inc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. The use of a common management investment company (or investment 
portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for both VLI Accounts and VA 
Accounts of the same Participating Insurance Company, or of two or more 
insurance companies that are affiliated persons of each other, is 
referred to herein as ``mixed funding.'' The use of a common management 
investment company (or investment portfolio thereof) as an investment 
medium for VLI Accounts and/or VA Accounts of two or more Participating 
Insurance Companies that are not affiliated persons of each other is 
referred to herein as ``shared funding.''
    9. Applicants propose that the Funds may sell their shares directly 
to Qualified Plans, Advisers, and a General Accounts of a Participating 
Insurance Company.
    10. The use of a common management investment company (or 
investment portfolio thereof) as an investment medium for Separate 
Accounts, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts is referred to 
herein as ``extended mixed funding.''

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for any 
company to serve as an investment adviser or principal underwriter of 
any investment company, including a unit investment trust, if an 
affiliated person of that company is subject to disqualification 
enumerated in Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of the 1940 Act. Sections 13(a), 
15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act have been deemed by the Commission to 
require ``pass-through'' voting with respect to an underlying 
investment company's shares.
    2. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act provide 
partial exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 
1940 Act to VLI Accounts supporting certain VLI Contracts and to their 
life insurance company depositors under limited circumstances, as 
described in the application. VLI Accounts, their

[[Page 27037]]

depositors and their principal underwriters may not rely on the 
exemptions provided by Rule 6e-2(b)(15) if shares of the Fund are held 
by a VLI Account through which flexible premium VLI Contracts are 
issued, a VLI Account of an unaffiliated Participating Insurance 
Company, an unaffiliated Adviser, any VA Account, a Qualified Plan or a 
General Account. VLI Accounts, their depositors and their principal 
underwriters may not rely on the exemptions provided by Rule 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) if Shares of a Fund are held by a VLI Account of an 
unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, a VA Account of an 
unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company, a Qualified Plan, an 
unaffiliated investment adviser or the General Account of an 
unaffiliated Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, Applicants 
request an order of the Commission granting exemptions from Sections 
9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 
6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder in cases where a scheduled or flexible 
premium VLI Account holds shares of a Fund and one or more of the 
following types of investors also hold Shares of the Funds: (i) VA 
Accounts and VLI Accounts (supporting scheduled premium or flexible 
premium VLI Contracts) of affiliated and unaffiliated Participating 
Insurance Companies; (ii) Qualified Plans; (iii) Advisers; and/or (iv) 
General Accounts.
    3. Applicants maintain that there is no policy reason for the sale 
of Fund Shares to Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts to 
prohibit or otherwise limit a Participating Insurance Company from 
relying on the relief provided by Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15). 
Nonetheless, Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) each specifically provides that 
the relief granted thereunder is available only where shares of the 
underlying fund are offered exclusively to insurance company separate 
accounts. In this regard, Applicants request exemptive relief to the 
extent necessary to permit shares of the Funds to be sold to Qualified 
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts while allowing Participating 
Insurance Companies and their Separate Accounts to enjoy the benefits 
of the relief granted under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) and Rule 6e- 3(T)(b)(15). 
Applicants note that if the Funds were to sell their shares only to 
Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) 
would not be necessary. The relief provided for under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) 
and Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to Qualified Plans, Advisers or 
General Accounts or to a registered investment company's ability to 
sell its shares to such purchasers.
    4. Applicants are not aware of any reason for excluding separate 
accounts and investment companies engaged in shared funding from the 
exemptive relief provided under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15), 
or for excluding separate accounts and investment companies engaged in 
mixed funding from the exemptive relief provided under Rule 6e-
2(b)(15). Similarly, Applicants are not aware of any reason for 
excluding Participating Insurance Companies from the exemptive relief 
requested because the Funds may also sell their shares to Qualified 
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts. Rather, Applicants submit that 
the proposed sale of shares of the Funds to these purchasers may allow 
for the development of larger pools of assets resulting in the 
potential for greater investment and diversification opportunities, and 
for decreased expenses at higher asset levels resulting in greater cost 
efficiencies.
    5. For the reasons explained below, Applicants have concluded that 
investment by Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts in the 
Funds should not increase the risk of material irreconcilable conflicts 
between owners of VLI Contracts and other types of investors or between 
owners of VLI Contracts issued by unaffiliated Participating Insurance 
Companies.
    6. Consistent with the Commission's authority under Section 6(c) of 
the 1940 Act to grant exemptive orders to a class or classes of persons 
and transactions, Applicants request exemptions for a class consisting 
of Participating Insurance Companies and their separate accounts 
investing in Existing and Future Funds of the Company, as well as their 
principal underwriters.
    7. Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act provides, in part, that the 
Commission, by order upon application, may conditionally or 
unconditionally exempt any person, security or transaction, or any 
class or classes of persons, securities or transactions, from any 
provision or provisions of the 1940 Act, or any rule or regulation 
thereunder, if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection 
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and 
provisions of the 1940 Act. Applicants submit that the exemptions 
requested are appropriate in the public interest and consistent with 
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the 
policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
    8. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act provides, among other things, 
that it is unlawful for any company to serve as investment adviser or 
principal underwriter of any registered open- end investment company if 
an affiliated person of that company is subject to a disqualification 
enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(i) and (ii) 
and Rules 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the 1940 Act provide 
exemptions from Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, subject to 
the limitations discussed above on mixed funding, extended mixed 
funding and shared funding. These exemptions limit the application of 
the eligibility restrictions to affiliated individuals or companies 
that directly participate in management or administration of the 
underlying investment company.
    9. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940 
Act provide exemptions from pass-through voting requirements with 
respect to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on 
mixed funding, extended mixed funding and shared funding are observed. 
Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the 
insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of its variable 
life insurance contract owners with respect to the investments of an 
underlying investment company, or any contract between such an 
investment company and its investment adviser, when required to do so 
by an insurance regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of 
paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T)). 
Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that an 
insurance company may disregard the voting instructions of owners of 
its variable life insurance contracts if such owners initiate any 
change in an underlying investment company's investment policies, 
principal underwriter or any investment adviser (provided that 
disregarding such voting instructions is reasonable and subject to the 
other provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B) and 
(b)(7)(ii)(C) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T)).
    10. Applicants represent that the sale of Fund shares to Qualified 
Plans, Advisers or General Accounts will not have any impact on the 
exemptions requested herein regarding the disregard of pass-through 
voting rights. Shares sold to Qualified Plans will be held by such 
Qualified Plans. The exercise of voting rights by Qualified Plans, 
whether by trustees, participants, beneficiaries, or investment 
managers engaged by the Qualified Plans, does not raise the type of 
issues respecting disregard of voting rights that are raised

[[Page 27038]]

by VLI Accounts. With respect to Qualified Plans, which are not 
registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, there is no 
requirement to pass through voting rights to Qualified Plan 
participants. Indeed, to the contrary, applicable law expressly 
reserves voting rights associated with Qualified Plan assets to certain 
specified persons.
    11. Similarly, Advisers and General Accounts are not subject to any 
pass-through voting rights. Accordingly, unlike the circumstances 
surrounding Separate Account investments in shares of the Funds, the 
issue of the resolution of any material irreconcilable conflicts with 
respect to voting is not present with respect to Advisers or General 
Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies.
    12. Applicants recognize that the prohibitions on mixed and shared 
funding might reflect concern regarding possible different investment 
motivations among investors. When Rule 6e-2 was first adopted, variable 
annuity separate accounts could invest in mutual funds whose shares 
were also offered to the general public. However, now, under the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the ``Code''), any underlying fund, 
including the Funds, that sells shares to a VLI Account or a VA 
Account, would, in effect, be precluded from also selling its shares to 
the public. Consequently, the Funds may not sell their shares to the 
public.
    13. Applicants assert that the rights of an insurance company on 
its own initiative or on instructions from a state insurance regulator 
to disregard the voting instructions of owners of Variable Contracts is 
not inconsistent with either mixed funding or shared funding. 
Applicants state that The National Association of Insurance 
Commissioners Variable Life Insurance Model Regulation suggests that it 
is unlikely that insurance regulators would find an underlying fund's 
investment policy, investment adviser or principal underwriter 
objectionable for one type of Variable Contract but not another type.
    14. Applicants assert that shared funding by unaffiliated insurance 
companies does not present any issues that do not already exist where a 
single insurance company is licensed to do business in several or all 
states. A particular state insurance regulator could require action 
that
    is inconsistent with the requirements of other states in which the 
insurance company offers its contracts. However, the fact that 
different insurers may be domiciled in different states does not create 
a significantly different or enlarged problem. Shared funding by 
unaffiliated insurers, in this respect, is no different than the use of 
the same investment company as the funding vehicle for affiliated 
insurers, which Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) permit. Affiliated 
insurers may be domiciled in different states and be subject to 
differing state law requirements.
    Affiliation does not reduce the potential, if any exists, for 
differences in state regulatory requirements. Applicants state that in 
any event, the conditions set forth below are designed to safeguard 
against, and provide procedures for resolving, any adverse effects that 
differences among state regulatory requirements may produce. If a 
particular state insurance regulator's decision conflicts with the 
majority of other state regulators, then the affected Participating 
Insurance Company will be required to withdraw its separate account 
investments in the relevant Fund. This requirement will be provided for 
in the participation agreement that will be entered into by 
Participating Insurance Companies with the relevant Fund.
    15. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) give Participating 
Insurance Companies the right to disregard the voting instructions of 
VLI Contract owners in certain circumstances. This right derives from 
the authority of state insurance regulators over Separate Accounts. 
Under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15), a Participating Insurance 
Company may disregard VLI Contract owner voting instructions only with 
respect to certain specified items. Affiliation does not eliminate the 
potential, if any exists, for divergent judgments as to the 
advisability or legality of a change in investment policies, principal 
underwriter or investment adviser initiated by such Contract owners. 
The potential for disagreement is limited by the requirements in Rules 
6e-2 and 6e-3(T) that the Participating Insurance Company's disregard 
of voting instructions be reasonable and based on specific good faith 
determinations.
    16. A particular Participating Insurance Company's disregard of 
voting instructions, nevertheless, could conflict with the voting 
instructions of a majority of VLI Contract owners. The Participating 
Insurance Company's action possibly could be different than the 
determination of all or some of the other Participating Insurance 
Companies (including affiliated insurers) that the voting instructions 
of VLI Contract owners should prevail, and either could preclude a 
majority vote approving the change or could represent a minority view. 
If the Participating Insurance Company's judgment represents a minority 
position or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating 
Insurance Company may be required, at the relevant Fund's election, to 
withdraw its Separate Accounts' investments in the relevant Fund. No 
charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. This 
requirement will be provided for in the participation agreement entered 
into by the Participating Insurance Companies with the relevant Fund.
    17. Applicants assert there is no reason why the investment 
policies of a Fund would or should be materially different from what 
these policies would or should be if the Fund supported only VA 
Accounts or VLI Accounts supporting flexible premium or scheduled 
premium VLI Contracts. Each type of insurance contract is designed as a 
long-term investment program.
    18. Each Fund will be managed to attempt to achieve its specified 
investment objective, and not favor or disfavor any particular 
Participating Insurance Company or type of insurance contract. 
Applicants assert there is no reason to believe that different features 
of various types of Variable Contracts will lead to different 
investment policies for each or for different Separate Accounts. The 
sale of Variable Contracts and ultimate success of all Separate 
Accounts depends, at least in part, on satisfactory investment 
performance, which provides an incentive for each Participating 
Insurance Company to seek optimal investment performance.
    19. Furthermore, no single investment strategy can be identified as 
appropriate to a particular Variable Contract. Each ``pool'' of VLI 
Contract and VA Contract owners is composed of individuals of diverse 
financial status, age, insurance needs and investment goals. A Fund 
supporting even one type of Variable Contract must accommodate these 
diverse factors in order to attract and retain purchasers. Permitting 
mixed and shared funding will provide economic support for the 
continuation of the Funds. Applicants state further that mixed and 
shared funding will broaden the base of potential Variable Contract 
owner investors, which may facilitate the establishment of additional 
Funds serving diverse goals.
    20. Applicants do not believe that the sale of the shares to 
Qualified Plans, Advisers or General Accounts will increase the 
potential for material irreconcilable conflicts of interest between or 
among different types of investors. In particular, Applicants see

[[Page 27039]]

very little potential for such conflicts beyond those that would 
otherwise exist between owners of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts. 
Applicants submit that either there are no conflicts of interest or 
that there exists the ability by the affected parties to resolve such 
conflicts consistent with the best interests of VLI Contract owners, VA 
Contract owners and Qualified Plan participants.
    21. Applicants state they considered whether there are any issues 
raised under the Code, Treasury Regulations, or Revenue Rulings 
thereunder, if Qualified Plans, Separate Accounts, Advisers and General 
Accounts all invest in the same Fund. Applicants have concluded that 
neither the Code, nor the Treasury Regulations nor Revenue Rulings 
thereunder present any inherent conflicts of interest if Qualified 
Plans, Advisers, General Accounts, and Separate Accounts all invest in 
the same Fund.
    22. Applicants note that, while there are differences in the manner 
in which distributions from separate accounts and Qualified Plans are 
taxed, these differences have no impact on the Funds. When 
distributions are to be made, and a separate account or Qualified Plan 
is unable to net purchase payments to make distributions, the separate 
account or Qualified Plan will redeem shares of the relevant Fund at 
its net asset values in conformity with Rule 22c-1 under the 1940 Act 
(without the imposition of any sales charge) to provide proceeds to 
meet distribution needs. A Participating Insurance Company will then 
make distributions in accordance with the terms of its Variable 
Contracts, and a Qualified Plan will then make distributions in 
accordance with the terms of the Qualified Plan.
    23. Applicants state that they considered whether it is possible to 
provide an equitable means of giving voting rights to Variable Contract 
owners, Qualified Plans, Advisers and General Accounts. In connection 
with any meeting of Fund shareholders, the Fund or its transfer agent 
will inform each Participating Insurance Company (with respect to its 
Separate Accounts and General Account), Adviser, and Qualified Plan of 
its share holdings and provide other information necessary for such 
shareholders to participate in the meeting (e.g., proxy materials). 
Each Participating Insurance Company then will solicit voting 
instructions from owners of VLI Contracts and VA Contracts in 
accordance with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), or Section 12(d)(1)(E)(iii)(aa) 
of the 1940 Act, as applicable, and its participation agreement with 
the relevant Fund. Shares of a Fund that are held by an Adviser or a 
General Account will generally be in the same proportion as all votes 
cast on behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights. 
However, an Adviser or General Account will vote its shares in such 
other manner as may be required by the Commission or its staff. Shares 
held by Qualified Plans will be voted in accordance with applicable 
law. The voting rights provided to Qualified Plans with respect to the 
shares would be no different from the voting rights that are provided 
to Qualified Plans with respect to shares of mutual funds sold to the 
general public. Furthermore, if a material irreconcilable conflict 
arises because of a Qualified Plan's decision to disregard Qualified 
Plan participant voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision 
represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the 
Qualified Plan may be required, at the election of the relevant Fund, 
to withdraw its investment in the Fund, and no charge or penalty will 
be imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
    24. Applicants do not believe that the ability of a Fund to sell 
its shares to a Qualified Plan, Adviser or General Account gives rise 
to a ``senior security'' as defined by Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act. 
Regardless of the rights and benefits of participants under Qualified 
Plans or owners of Variable Contracts; Separate Accounts, Qualified 
Plans, Advisers and General Accounts only have, or will only have, 
rights with respect to their respective shares of a Fund. These parties 
can only redeem such shares at net asset value. No shareholder of a 
Fund has any preference over any other shareholder with respect to 
distribution of assets or payment of dividends.
    25. Applicants do not believe that the veto power of state 
insurance commissioners over certain potential changes to Fund 
investment objectives approved by Variable Contract owners creates 
conflicts between the interests of such owners and the interests of 
Qualified Plan participants, Advisers or General Accounts. Applicants 
note that a basic premise of corporate democracy and shareholder voting 
is that not all shareholders may agree with a particular proposal. 
Their interests and opinions may differ, but this does not mean that 
inherent conflicts of interest exist between or among such shareholders 
or that occasional conflicts of interest that do occur between or among 
them are likely to be irreconcilable.
    26. Although Participating Insurance Companies may have to overcome 
regulatory impediments in redeeming shares of a Fund held by their 
Separate Accounts, Applicants state that the Qualified Plans and 
participants in participant-directed Qualified Plans can make decisions 
quickly and redeem their shares in a Fund and reinvest in another 
investment company or other funding vehicle without impediments, or as 
is the case with most Qualified Plans, hold cash pending suitable 
investment. As a result, conflicts between the interests of Variable 
Contract owners and the interests of Qualified Plans and Qualified Plan 
participants can usually be resolved quickly since the Qualified Plans 
can, on their own, redeem their Fund shares. Advisers and General 
accounts can similarly redeem their shares of a Fund and make 
alternative investments at any time.
    27. Finally, Applicants considered whether there is a potential for 
future conflicts of interest between Participating Insurance Companies 
and Qualified Plans created by future changes in the tax laws. 
Applicants do not see any greater potential for material irreconcilable 
conflicts arising between the interests of Variable Contract owners and 
Qualified Plan participants from future changes in the federal tax laws 
than that which already exists between VLI Contract owners and VA 
Contract owners.
    28. Applicants recognize that the foregoing is not an all-inclusive 
list, but rather is representative of issues that they believe are 
relevant to the Application. Applicants believe that the sale of Fund 
shares to Qualified Plans would not increase the risk of material 
irreconcilable conflicts between the interests of Qualified Plan 
participants and Variable Contract owners or other investors. Further, 
Applicants submit that the use of the Funds with respect to Qualified 
Plans is not substantially dissimilar from each Fund's current and 
anticipated use, in that Qualified Plans, like separate accounts, are 
generally long-term investors.
    29. Applicants assert that permitting a Fund to sell its shares to 
an Adviser or to the General Account of a Participating Insurance 
Company will enhance management of each Fund without raising 
significant concerns regarding material irreconcilable conflicts among 
different types of investors.
    30. Applicants assert that various factors have limited the number 
of insurance companies that offer Variable Contracts. These factors 
include the costs of organizing and operating a funding vehicle, 
certain insurers' lack of experience with respect to investment

[[Page 27040]]

management, and the lack of name recognition by the public of certain 
insurance companies as investment experts. In particular, some smaller 
life insurance companies may not find it economically feasible, or 
within their investment or administrative expertise, to enter the 
Variable Contract business on their own. Applicants state that use of a 
Fund as a common investment vehicle for Variable Contracts would reduce 
or eliminate these concerns. Mixed and shared funding should also 
provide several benefits to owners of Variable Contracts by eliminating 
a significant portion of the costs of establishing and administering 
separate underlying funds.
    31. Applicants state that the Participating Insurance Companies 
will benefit not only from the investment and administrative expertise 
of the Funds' Adviser, but also from the potential cost efficiencies 
and investment flexibility afforded by larger pools of funds. 
Therefore, making the Funds available for mixed and shared funding will 
encourage more insurance companies to offer Variable Contracts. This 
should result in increased competition with respect to both Variable 
Contract design and pricing, which can in turn be expected to result in 
more product variety. Applicants also assert that sale of shares in a 
Fund to Qualified Plans, in addition to Separate Accounts, will result 
in an increased amount of assets available for investment in Fund.
    32. Applicants also submit that, regardless of the type of 
shareholder in a Fund, an Adviser is or would be contractually and 
otherwise obligated to manage the Fund solely and exclusively in 
accordance with the Fund's investment objectives, policies and 
restrictions, as well as any guidelines established by the Fund's Board 
of Trustees (the ``Board'').
    33. Applicants assert that sales of Fund shares, as described 
above, will not have any adverse federal income tax consequences to 
other investors in such Fund.
    34. Applicants assert that granting the exemptions requested herein 
is in the public interest and, as discussed above, will not compromise 
the regulatory purposes of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), or 15(b) of the 
1940 Act or Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T) thereunder. In addition, Applicants 
submit that the exemptions requested are consistent with the protection 
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and 
provisions of the 1940 Act.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that the Commission order requested herein shall 
be subject to the following conditions:
    1. A majority of the Board of each Fund will consist of persons who 
are not ``interested persons'' of the Fund, as defined by Section 
2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, and as modified by 
any applicable orders of the Commission, except that if this condition 
is not met by reason of death, disqualification or bona fide 
resignation of any director/trustee or directors/trustees, then the 
operation of this condition will be suspended: (a) For a period of 90 
days if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled by the Board; (b) for a 
period of 150 days if a vote of shareholders is required to fill the 
vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for such longer period as the Commission 
may prescribe by order upon application, or by future rule.
    2. The Board will monitor a Fund for the existence of any material 
irreconcilable conflict between and among the interests of the owners 
of all VLI Contracts and VA Contracts and participants of all Qualified 
Plans investing in the Fund, and determine what action, if any, should 
be taken in response to such conflicts. A material irreconcilable 
conflict may arise for a variety of reasons, including: (a) An action 
by any state insurance regulatory authority; (b) a change in applicable 
federal or state insurance, tax, or securities laws or regulations, or 
a public ruling, private letter ruling, no-action or interpretive 
letter, or any similar action by insurance, tax or securities 
regulatory authorities; (c) an administrative or judicial decision in 
any relevant proceeding; (d) the manner in which the investments of the 
Fund are being managed; (e) a difference in voting instructions given 
by VA Contract owners, VLI Contract owners, and Qualified Plans or 
Qualified Plan participants; (f) a decision by a Participating 
Insurance Company to disregard the voting instructions of contract 
owners; or (g) if applicable, a decision by a Qualified Plan to 
disregard the voting instructions of Qualified Plan participants.
    3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well 
as by virtue of any investment of General Account assets in a Fund), 
any Advisers, and any Qualified Plan that executes a participation 
agreement upon its becoming an owner of 10% or more of the net assets 
of a Fund (collectively, ``Participants'') will report any potential or 
existing conflicts to the Board. Each Participant will be responsible 
for assisting the Board in carrying out the Board's responsibilities 
under these conditions by providing the Board with all information 
reasonably necessary for the Board to consider any issues raised. This 
responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an obligation by each 
Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board whenever Variable 
Contract owner voting instructions are disregarded, and, if pass-
through voting is applicable, an obligation by each trustee for a 
Qualified Plan to inform the Board whenever it has determined to 
disregard Qualified Plan participant voting instructions. The 
responsibility to report such information and conflicts, and to assist 
the Board, will be a contractual obligation of all Participating 
Insurance Companies under their participation agreement with a Fund, 
and these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the 
interests of the Variable Contract owners. The responsibility to report 
such information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, also will be 
contractual obligations of all Qualified Plans under their 
participation agreement with a Fund, and such agreements will provide 
that these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the 
interests of Qualified Plan participants.
    4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board, or a majority of 
the disinterested directors/trustees of the Board, that a material 
irreconcilable conflict exists, then the relevant Participant will, at 
its expense and to the extent reasonably practicable (as determined by 
a majority of the disinterested directors/trustees), take whatever 
steps are necessary to remedy or eliminate the material irreconcilable 
conflict, up to and including: (a) Withdrawing the assets allocable to 
some or all of their VLI Accounts or VA Accounts from the relevant Fund 
and reinvesting such assets in a different investment vehicle, 
including another Fund; (b) in the case of a Participating Insurance 
Company, submitting the question as to whether such segregation should 
be implemented to a vote of all affected Variable Contract owners and, 
as appropriate, segregating the assets of any appropriate group (i.e., 
VA Contract owners or VLI Contact owners of one or more Participating 
Insurance Companies) that votes in favor of such segregation, or 
offering to the affected Variable Contract owners the option of making 
such a change; (c) withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of 
the Qualified Plans from the affected Fund and reinvesting them in a 
different investment medium; and (d) establishing a new registered

[[Page 27041]]

management investment company or managed separate account. If a 
material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a decision by a 
Participating Insurance Company to disregard Variable Contract owner 
voting instructions, and that decision represents a minority position 
or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating Insurance 
Company may be required, at the election of the Fund, to withdraw such 
Participating Insurance Company's Separate Account investments in a 
Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such 
withdrawal. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a 
Qualified Plan's decision to disregard Qualified Plan participant 
voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a 
minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the Qualified Plan 
may be required, at the election of the Fund, to withdraw its 
investment in a Fund, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a 
result of such withdrawal. The responsibility to take remedial action 
in the event of a Board determination of a material irreconcilable 
conflict and to bear the cost of such remedial action will be a 
contractual obligation of all Participants under their participation 
agreement with a Fund, and these responsibilities will be carried out 
with a view only to the interests of Variable Contract owners or, as 
applicable, Qualified Plan participants.
    For purposes of this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested 
directors/trustees of the Board of a Fund will determine whether or not 
any proposed action adequately remedies any material irreconcilable 
conflict, but, in no event, will the Fund or its investment adviser be 
required to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract 
or Qualified Plan. No Participating Insurance Company will be required 
by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable 
Contract if any offer to do so has been declined by vote of a majority 
of the Variable Contract owners materially and adversely affected by 
the material irreconcilable conflict. Further, no Qualified Plan will 
be required by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for 
the Qualified Plan if: (a) A majority of the Qualified Plan 
participants materially and adversely affected by the irreconcilable 
material conflict vote to decline such offer, or (b) pursuant to 
documents governing the Qualified Plan, the Qualified Plan trustee 
makes such decision without a Qualified Plan participant vote.
    5. The determination by the Board of the existence of a material 
irreconcilable conflict and its implications will be made known in 
writing promptly to all Participants.
    6. Participating Insurance Companies will provide pass-through 
voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners whose Variable 
Contracts are issued through registered Separate Accounts for as long 
as the Commission continues to interpret the 1940 Act as requiring such 
pass-through voting privileges. However, as to Variable Contracts 
issued through Separate Accounts not registered as investment companies 
under the 1940 Act, pass-through voting privileges will be extended to 
owners of such Variable Contracts to the extent granted by the 
Participating Insurance Company. Accordingly, such Participating 
Insurance Companies, where applicable, will vote the shares of each 
Fund held in their Separate Accounts in a manner consistent with voting 
instructions timely received from Variable Contract owners. 
Participating Insurance Companies will be responsible for assuring that 
each of their Separate Accounts investing in a Fund calculates voting 
privileges in a manner consistent with all other Participating 
Insurance Companies investing in that Fund.
    The obligation to calculate voting privileges as provided in the 
Application shall be a contractual obligation of all Participating 
Insurance Companies under their participation agreement with the Fund. 
Each Participating Insurance Company will vote shares of each Fund held 
in its Separate Accounts for which no timely voting instructions are 
received, as well as shares held in its General Account or otherwise 
attributed to it, in the same proportion as those shares for which 
voting instructions are received. Each Qualified Plan will vote as 
required by applicable law, governing Qualified Plan documents and as 
provided in the Application.
    7. As long as the Commission continues to interpret the 1940 Act as 
requiring that pass-through voting privileges be provided to Variable 
Contract owners, a Fund Adviser or any General Account will vote its 
respective shares of a Fund in the same proportion as all votes cast on 
behalf of all Variable Contract owners having voting rights; provided, 
however, that such an Adviser or General Account shall vote its shares 
in such other manner as may be required by the Commission or its staff.
    8. Each Fund will comply with all provisions of the 1940 Act 
requiring voting by shareholders (which, for these purposes, shall be 
the persons having a voting interest in its shares), and, in 
particular, the Fund will either provide for annual meetings (except to 
the extent that the Commission may interpret Section 16 of the 1940 Act 
not to require such meetings) or comply with Section 16(c) of the 1940 
Act (although each Fund is not, or will not be, one of those trusts of 
the type described in Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act), as well as with 
Section 16(a) of the 1940 Act and, if and when applicable, Section 
16(b) of the 1940 Act. Further, each Fund will act in accordance with 
the Commission's interpretations of the requirements of Section 16(a) 
with respect to periodic elections of directors/trustees and with 
whatever rules the Commission may promulgate thereunder.
    9. A Fund will make its shares available to the VLI Accounts, VA 
Accounts, and Qualified Plans at or about the time it accepts any seed 
capital from its Adviser or from the General Account of a Participating 
Insurance Company.
    10. Each Fund has notified, or will notify, all Participants that 
disclosure regarding potential risks of mixed and shared funding may be 
appropriate in VA Account and VLI Account Prospectuses or Qualified 
Plan documents. Each Fund will disclose, in its prospectus that: (a) 
Shares of the Fund may be offered to both VA Accounts and VLI Accounts 
and, if applicable, to Qualified Plans; (b) due to differences in tax 
treatment and other considerations, the interests of various Variable 
Contract owners participating in the Fund and the interests of 
Qualified Plan participants investing in the Fund, if applicable, may 
conflict; and (c) the Fund's Board will monitor events in order to 
identify the existence of any material irreconcilable conflicts and to 
determine what action, if any, should be taken in response to any such 
conflicts.
    11. If and to the extent Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) under the 1940 
Act are amended, or proposed Rule 6e-3 under the 1940 Act is adopted, 
to provide exemptive relief from any provision of the 1940 Act, or the 
rules thereunder, with respect to mixed or shared funding, on terms and 
conditions materially different from any exemptions granted in the 
order requested in the Application, then each Fund and/or Participating 
Insurance Companies, as appropriate, shall take such steps as may be 
necessary to comply with Rules 6e-2 or 6e-3(T), as amended, or Rule 6e-
3, to the extent such rules are applicable.
    12. Each Participant, at least annually, shall submit to the Board 
of each Fund such reports, materials or data as the Board reasonably 
may request so that

[[Page 27042]]

the directors/trustees may fully carry out the obligations imposed upon 
the Board by the conditions contained in the Application. Such reports, 
materials and data shall be submitted more frequently if deemed 
appropriate by the Board. The obligations of the Participants to 
provide these reports, materials and data to the Board, when it so 
reasonably requests, shall be a contractual obligation of all 
Participants under their participation agreement with the Fund.
    13. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by a 
Board, and all Board action with regard to determining the existence of 
a conflict, notifying Participants of a conflict and determining 
whether any proposed action adequately remedies a conflict, will be 
properly recorded in the minutes of the Board or other appropriate 
records, and such minutes or other records shall be made available to 
the Commission upon request.
    14. Each Fund will not accept a purchase order from a Qualified 
Plan if such purchase would make the Qualified Plan an owner of 10 
percent or more of the assets of a Fund unless the Qualified Plan 
executes an agreement with the Fund governing participation in the Fund 
that includes the conditions set forth herein to the extent applicable. 
A Qualified Plan will execute an application containing an 
acknowledgement of this condition at the time of its initial purchase 
of shares.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12509 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.