Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 7.35E Relating to the Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction Following a Regulatory Halt, 26121-26123 [2018-11978]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(1) If an SCA Employer loses a
contract to a successor SCA Employer,
and if the successor has an obligation to
contribute to the Plan for work
performed under the Service Contract at
the same or a higher contribution rate
and for at least 85% as many
contribution base units as such SCA
Employer had the obligation to
contribute during the plan year ending
before such SCA Employer lost the
contract, a partial withdrawal only
occurs if the SCA Employer has an
obligation to contribute for no more
than an insubstantial portion of its work
in the jurisdiction of a collective
bargaining agreement for which
contributions are or were required to the
Plan, and either,
(A) The SCA Employer continues to
perform work in the jurisdiction of a
collective bargaining agreement of the
type for which contributions were
previously required; or
(B) Within 5 years after the date on
which the SCA Employer loses the
Service Contract,
(i) The federal government decides to
close the facility, have the work
performed by government employees, or
transfer the work covered by the service
contract to another location that is not
covered by a collective bargaining unit;
or
(ii) The successor SCA Employer
ceases contributions to the Plan for
work performed under the Service
Contract.
In the case of termination by mass
withdrawal (within the meaning of
section 4041A(a)(2) of ERISA), the
proposed amendment provides that
section 4203(b)(3) of ERISA, the
provision that allows a construction
employer to resume covered work after
3 years of withdrawal, rather than the
standard 5-year restriction, is not
applicable. Therefore, in the event of a
mass withdrawal, there is still a 5-year
restriction on resuming covered work in
the jurisdiction of the Plan. The Plan’s
request includes the actuarial data on
which the Plan relies to support its
contention that the amendment will not
pose a significant risk to the insurance
system under Title IV of ERISA.
Comments
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments on the
pending exemption request. All
comments will be made part of the
administrative record.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:19 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 241001
Issued in Washington, DC, by:
William Reeder,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2018–12035 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83341; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
7.35E Relating to the Auction
Reference Price for a Trading Halt
Auction Following a Regulatory Halt
May 30, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 15,
2018, NYSE American LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE American’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7.35E relating to the Auction
Reference Price for a Trading Halt
Auction following a regulatory halt. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
26121
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7.35E (Auctions) relating to the
Auction Reference Price for a Trading
Halt Auction following a regulatory halt.
Under Rule 7.35E, Auction Reference
Prices are used for a number of
purposes, including determining
Auction Collars under Rule
7.35E(a)(10)(A). Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A)
defines the Auction Reference Price
applicable to auctions on the Exchange.
For the Trading Halt Auction, the
Reference Price is the last consolidated
round-lot price of that trading day, and
if none, the prior day’s Official Closing
Price (except as provided for in Rule
7.35E(e)(7)(A)).4
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A) to permit the
Exchange to designate a different
Auction Reference Price for a Trading
Halt Auction following a regulatory halt.
The Exchange believes that if the price
of a security changes during a regulatory
halt, for example, due to a news event,
an Auction Reference Price based on the
last consolidated round-lot price of that
trading day, or if none, the prior day’s
Official Closing Price, may no longer
reflect the value of the security. In such
case, using that price for purposes of
calculating Auction Collars for the
Trading Halt Auction may unnecessarily
constrict the price at which such
auction would initially be permitted
and potentially lead to an unnecessary
number of extensions before the security
resumes trading, thereby delaying the
Trading Halt Auction.5 The Exchange
believes that for these scenarios, it
would be appropriate to designate a
different Auction Reference Price.6
4 Rule 7.35E(e)(7)(A) provides for a different
Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction
following a Trading Pause. The ‘‘Official Closing
Price’’ is defined in Rule 1.1E(gg).
5 Pursuant to Rule 7.35E(e)(6), the Re-Opening
Time for a Trading Halt Auction will be extended
if the Indicative Match Price, before being adjusted
based on Auction Collars, would be below (above)
the Lower (Upper) Auction Collar or if there is a
sell (buy) Market Imbalance.
6 For example, the Exchange’s affiliated exchange,
NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’) recently amended
NYSE Arca Rule 7.35–E(a)(8)(A), which is identical
to Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A), on a temporary basis to
provide for a different Auction Reference Price for
a security that was the subject of a regulatory halt.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82716
(February 14, 2018), 83 FR 7517 (February 21, 2018)
(SR–NYSEArca–2018–12). NYSE Arca sought such
relief to respond to the impact of market-wide
Continued
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
26122
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
To effect this change, the Exchange
proposes to amend Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A)
to provide that if the Auction Reference
Price would impact a fair and orderly
Trading Halt Auction following a
regulatory halt, the CEO of the
Exchange, or his or her designee, may
designate a different Auction Reference
Price.7
Because the specific circumstances for
a security and impact on pricing cannot
be known in advance, the Exchange
does not believe it would be
appropriate, let alone feasible, to specify
in the rule what the alternate Auction
Reference Price should be. For example,
NYSE Arca designated a revised
Auction Reference Price for SVXY that
was 84% lower than the Auction
Reference Price that would have been
required under the NYSE Arca rule.8
But SVXY represents just one example.
The reasons why an Auction Reference
Price for a Trading Halt Auction
following a regulatory halt may no
longer be appropriate are myriad, and
include external reasons specific to a
security, such as news relating to an
issuer or a corporate action. The
Exchange therefore believes that the
facts and circumstances for individual
securities should inform the Exchange
of an Auction Reference Price to
designate under the proposed rule.
As noted above, the Exchange would
not conduct a Trading Halt Auction
until all Market Orders can be satisfied
in that auction and extends the time
before trading in a security resumes
until such time. The Exchange believes,
however, that if the last consolidated
sale price no longer reflects the value of
such security, a Trading Halt Auction
may be unnecessarily delayed with
multiple extensions. By contrast,
enabling the Exchange to designate a
different Auction Reference Price could
potentially reduce the number of
extensions, thus eliminating
unnecessary delay and allowing for a
fair and orderly auction process. In such
case, the Auction Reference Price
designated by the Exchange does not
need to be perfectly calibrated, as the
trading volatility on February 5, 2018 on the pricing
of the ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
(SVXY). In that scenario, NYSE Arca halted trading
in SVXY before trading began on February 6, 2018.
Because the Official Closing Price no longer
reflected the value of the security and would not
have been an appropriate Auction Reference Price,
to protect and fair and orderly market, NYSE Arca
proposed a different Auction Reference Price for the
Trading Halt Auction.
7 See, e.g., New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’) Rule 15(f)(1) (providing authority for the
CEO of the NYSE to suspend the requirement to
publish pre-opening indications for a security if,
absent relief, the operation of the Exchange is likely
to be impaired).
8 See supra note 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:19 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 241001
extension logic would ensure that the
Trading Halt Auction would not occur
until equilibrium among all Market
Orders is met and the overall trading
auction interest is satisfied at or within
the auction collars. The Exchange
believes that it would promote a more
fair and orderly, and timely, Trading
Halt Auction, for the Exchange to
exercise the discretion as proposed
when the last consolidated round-lot
price of that trading day, or if none, the
prior day’s Official Closing Price, would
otherwise be significantly out of sync
with the value of the security. The
Exchange believes that having the CEO,
or his or her designee, designate the
Auction Reference Price would ensure
that proper deliberation would be put
into determining such alternative
Auction Reference Price.
The proposed rule would further
provide that the Exchange would
announce the updated Auction
Reference Price prior to the Trading Halt
Auction. Pursuant to Rule 7.35E(a)(4),
the Exchange publishes the Auction
Reference Price for a Trading Halt
Auction via a proprietary data feed. If
the Exchange designates a different
Auction Reference Price, that price
would not only be disseminated via the
proprietary data feed, but the Exchange
would also announce the new Auction
Reference Price by Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),9 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),10 in
particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that it would
promote the protection of investors and
the public interest to amend Rule
7.35E(a)(8)(A) to permit the Exchange to
designate a different Auction Reference
Price for a Trading Halt Auction
following a regulatory halt. In
particular, the Exchange believes that
using an Auction Reference Price based
on a price that no longer reflects the
value of the security could result in an
unnecessary number of extensions
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 15
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
before the Trading Halt Auction would
be permitted to occur under Rule
7.35E(e)(6). By contrast, enabling the
Exchange to designate a different
Auction Reference Price could
potentially reduce the number of
extensions, thus eliminating
unnecessary delay and allowing for a
fair and orderly auction process. In such
case, the Auction Reference Price
designated by the Exchange does not
need to be perfectly calibrated, as the
extension logic would ensure that the
Trading Halt Auction would not occur
until equilibrium among all Market
Orders is met and the overall trading
auction interest is satisfied at or within
the auction collars. The Exchange
believes that it would promote a more
fair and orderly, and timely, Trading
Halt Auction, for the Exchange to
exercise the discretion as proposed
when the last consolidated round-lot
price of that trading day, or if none, the
prior day’s Official Closing Price, would
otherwise be significantly out of sync
with the value of the security. The
Exchange believes that having the CEO,
or his or her designee, designate the
Auction Reference Price would ensure
that proper deliberation would be put
into determining such alternative
Auction Reference Price.
The Exchange therefore believes that
it would remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, protect investors
and the public interest to amend Rule
7.35E(a)(8)(A) to provide that if the
Auction Reference Price would impact a
fair and orderly Trading Halt Auction
following a regulatory halt, the CEO of
the Exchange, or his or her designee,
may designate a different Auction
Reference Price.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed rule change would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and in
general, protect investors and the public
interest because the Exchange would
provide notice of any change to an
Auction Reference Price, both via the
proprietary data feed and a Trader
Update, thereby providing transparency
to investors and the public regarding the
Auction Reference Price that would be
used for a Trading Halt Auction.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Notices
rule change is not designed to address
any competitive issues, but rather to
protect investors and the public by
providing the Exchange with authority
to designate an Auction Reference Price
for a Trading Halt Auction following a
regulatory halt if the Auction Reference
Price, as defined in the current rule,
would impair a fair and orderly auction.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate
and publishes its reasons for so finding
or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2018–22 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–22. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:19 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 241001
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2018–22 and
should be submitted on or before June
26, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–11978 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–83349; File No. SR–MIAX–
2018–11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rule 307,
Position Limits, and Exchange Rule
309, Exercise Limits
May 30, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on May 24, 2018, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26123
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend Exchange Rule 307, Position
Limits, Interpretations and Policies .01,
and Exchange Rule 309, Exercise Limits,
Interpretations and Policies .01, to
amend the position and exercise limits
for options on the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Trust (‘‘SPY’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/ at MIAX Options’ principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Exchange Rule 307, Position Limits,
and Exchange Rule 309, Exercise Limits,
establish position and exercise limits,
respectively, for aggregate positions in
option contracts traded on the
Exchange. Interpretations and Policies
.01 to Exchange Rule 307 lists specific
position limits for certain select
underlying securities, and
Interpretations and Policies .01 to
Exchange Rule 309 lists specific
exercise limits for certain select
underlying securities. SPY is among the
certain select underlying securities
listed in each such Rule. Currently,
these Rules provide that there are no
position limits and there are no exercise
limits on options overlying SPY
pursuant to a pilot program, which is
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26121-26123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11978]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-83341; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2018-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 7.35E Relating to the
Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction Following a
Regulatory Halt
May 30, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on May 15, 2018, NYSE American LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.35E relating to the Auction
Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction following a regulatory halt.
The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.35E (Auctions) relating to
the Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction following a
regulatory halt.
Under Rule 7.35E, Auction Reference Prices are used for a number of
purposes, including determining Auction Collars under Rule
7.35E(a)(10)(A). Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A) defines the Auction Reference
Price applicable to auctions on the Exchange. For the Trading Halt
Auction, the Reference Price is the last consolidated round-lot price
of that trading day, and if none, the prior day's Official Closing
Price (except as provided for in Rule 7.35E(e)(7)(A)).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Rule 7.35E(e)(7)(A) provides for a different Auction
Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction following a Trading
Pause. The ``Official Closing Price'' is defined in Rule 1.1E(gg).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A) to permit the
Exchange to designate a different Auction Reference Price for a Trading
Halt Auction following a regulatory halt. The Exchange believes that if
the price of a security changes during a regulatory halt, for example,
due to a news event, an Auction Reference Price based on the last
consolidated round-lot price of that trading day, or if none, the prior
day's Official Closing Price, may no longer reflect the value of the
security. In such case, using that price for purposes of calculating
Auction Collars for the Trading Halt Auction may unnecessarily
constrict the price at which such auction would initially be permitted
and potentially lead to an unnecessary number of extensions before the
security resumes trading, thereby delaying the Trading Halt Auction.\5\
The Exchange believes that for these scenarios, it would be appropriate
to designate a different Auction Reference Price.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Pursuant to Rule 7.35E(e)(6), the Re-Opening Time for a
Trading Halt Auction will be extended if the Indicative Match Price,
before being adjusted based on Auction Collars, would be below
(above) the Lower (Upper) Auction Collar or if there is a sell (buy)
Market Imbalance.
\6\ For example, the Exchange's affiliated exchange, NYSE Arca,
Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') recently amended NYSE Arca Rule 7.35-
E(a)(8)(A), which is identical to Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A), on a
temporary basis to provide for a different Auction Reference Price
for a security that was the subject of a regulatory halt. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82716 (February 14, 2018), 83 FR
7517 (February 21, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-12). NYSE Arca sought
such relief to respond to the impact of market-wide trading
volatility on February 5, 2018 on the pricing of the ProShares Short
VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY). In that scenario, NYSE Arca
halted trading in SVXY before trading began on February 6, 2018.
Because the Official Closing Price no longer reflected the value of
the security and would not have been an appropriate Auction
Reference Price, to protect and fair and orderly market, NYSE Arca
proposed a different Auction Reference Price for the Trading Halt
Auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26122]]
To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule
7.35E(a)(8)(A) to provide that if the Auction Reference Price would
impact a fair and orderly Trading Halt Auction following a regulatory
halt, the CEO of the Exchange, or his or her designee, may designate a
different Auction Reference Price.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') Rule
15(f)(1) (providing authority for the CEO of the NYSE to suspend the
requirement to publish pre-opening indications for a security if,
absent relief, the operation of the Exchange is likely to be
impaired).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the specific circumstances for a security and impact on
pricing cannot be known in advance, the Exchange does not believe it
would be appropriate, let alone feasible, to specify in the rule what
the alternate Auction Reference Price should be. For example, NYSE Arca
designated a revised Auction Reference Price for SVXY that was 84%
lower than the Auction Reference Price that would have been required
under the NYSE Arca rule.\8\ But SVXY represents just one example. The
reasons why an Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction
following a regulatory halt may no longer be appropriate are myriad,
and include external reasons specific to a security, such as news
relating to an issuer or a corporate action. The Exchange therefore
believes that the facts and circumstances for individual securities
should inform the Exchange of an Auction Reference Price to designate
under the proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the Exchange would not conduct a Trading Halt
Auction until all Market Orders can be satisfied in that auction and
extends the time before trading in a security resumes until such time.
The Exchange believes, however, that if the last consolidated sale
price no longer reflects the value of such security, a Trading Halt
Auction may be unnecessarily delayed with multiple extensions. By
contrast, enabling the Exchange to designate a different Auction
Reference Price could potentially reduce the number of extensions, thus
eliminating unnecessary delay and allowing for a fair and orderly
auction process. In such case, the Auction Reference Price designated
by the Exchange does not need to be perfectly calibrated, as the
extension logic would ensure that the Trading Halt Auction would not
occur until equilibrium among all Market Orders is met and the overall
trading auction interest is satisfied at or within the auction collars.
The Exchange believes that it would promote a more fair and orderly,
and timely, Trading Halt Auction, for the Exchange to exercise the
discretion as proposed when the last consolidated round-lot price of
that trading day, or if none, the prior day's Official Closing Price,
would otherwise be significantly out of sync with the value of the
security. The Exchange believes that having the CEO, or his or her
designee, designate the Auction Reference Price would ensure that
proper deliberation would be put into determining such alternative
Auction Reference Price.
The proposed rule would further provide that the Exchange would
announce the updated Auction Reference Price prior to the Trading Halt
Auction. Pursuant to Rule 7.35E(a)(4), the Exchange publishes the
Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction via a proprietary
data feed. If the Exchange designates a different Auction Reference
Price, that price would not only be disseminated via the proprietary
data feed, but the Exchange would also announce the new Auction
Reference Price by Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\9\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\10\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it would promote the protection of
investors and the public interest to amend Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A) to
permit the Exchange to designate a different Auction Reference Price
for a Trading Halt Auction following a regulatory halt. In particular,
the Exchange believes that using an Auction Reference Price based on a
price that no longer reflects the value of the security could result in
an unnecessary number of extensions before the Trading Halt Auction
would be permitted to occur under Rule 7.35E(e)(6). By contrast,
enabling the Exchange to designate a different Auction Reference Price
could potentially reduce the number of extensions, thus eliminating
unnecessary delay and allowing for a fair and orderly auction process.
In such case, the Auction Reference Price designated by the Exchange
does not need to be perfectly calibrated, as the extension logic would
ensure that the Trading Halt Auction would not occur until equilibrium
among all Market Orders is met and the overall trading auction interest
is satisfied at or within the auction collars. The Exchange believes
that it would promote a more fair and orderly, and timely, Trading Halt
Auction, for the Exchange to exercise the discretion as proposed when
the last consolidated round-lot price of that trading day, or if none,
the prior day's Official Closing Price, would otherwise be
significantly out of sync with the value of the security. The Exchange
believes that having the CEO, or his or her designee, designate the
Auction Reference Price would ensure that proper deliberation would be
put into determining such alternative Auction Reference Price.
The Exchange therefore believes that it would remove impediments
to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, protect investors and the public
interest to amend Rule 7.35E(a)(8)(A) to provide that if the Auction
Reference Price would impact a fair and orderly Trading Halt Auction
following a regulatory halt, the CEO of the Exchange, or his or her
designee, may designate a different Auction Reference Price.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule change would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and in general, protect investors
and the public interest because the Exchange would provide notice of
any change to an Auction Reference Price, both via the proprietary data
feed and a Trader Update, thereby providing transparency to investors
and the public regarding the Auction Reference Price that would be used
for a Trading Halt Auction.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
the proposed
[[Page 26123]]
rule change is not designed to address any competitive issues, but
rather to protect investors and the public by providing the Exchange
with authority to designate an Auction Reference Price for a Trading
Halt Auction following a regulatory halt if the Auction Reference
Price, as defined in the current rule, would impair a fair and orderly
auction.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-22. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2018-22 and
should be submitted on or before June 26, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-11978 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P