Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 24973-24974 [2018-11713]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Notices
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
Commerce intends to initiate the next
sunset review of the orders not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the applicability date of
continuation.
This sunset review and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(c) of the
Act and published pursuant to section
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: May 23, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–11541 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–867]
Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Notice of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
preliminarily determines that Hyundai
Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd.
(HEES) is the successor-in-interest to
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
(HHI), and that HHI’s current cash
deposit rate is the rate applicable for all
entries of large power transformers
exported by HEES. Further, we
preliminarily determine that the
application of the cash deposit rate
applicable to HEES shall be made
retroactively to the effective date of the
first entry by HEES.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable May 31, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Moses Song, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 31, 2012, the Department
of Commerce (Commerce) published in
the Federal Register an antidumping
duty order on large power transformers
(LPTs) from the Republic of Korea
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 May 30, 2018
Jkt 241001
(Korea).1 HHI is one of the producers/
exporters reviewed in the less-than fairvalue investigation and has been
reviewed in each subsequent
administrative review of the Order.
During the 2014/2015 administrative
review, covering the period August 1,
2014, through July 31, 2015, Commerce
assigned HHI an antidumping duty rate
of 60.81 percent, finding that the
application of total adverse facts
available (AFA) was warranted.2 In
addition, during the 2015/2016
administrative review, covering the
period August 1, 2015, through July 31,
2016, Commerce continued to assign
HHI an antidumping duty rate of 60.81
percent, finding that the application of
total AFA was warranted.3
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.216(d), on December 4,
2017, Commerce self-initiated a
Changed Circumstances Review (CCR)
regarding HHI’s new spin off company,
HEES, based on information obtained
(1) during the course of the 2014/2015
and 2015/2016 administrative reviews,
(2) via public search and the phone
conversation with a representative
retained by ABB Inc.’s (ABB’s or the
petitioner’s) counsel, and (3) from U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
data.4
Scope of the Order
The scope of this Order covers large
liquid dielectric power transformers
having a top power handling capacity
greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt
amperes (60 megavolt amperes),
whether assembled or unassembled,
complete or incomplete.
Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies
consisting of the active part and any
other parts attached to, imported with or
invoiced with the active parts of LPTs.
The ‘‘active part’’ of the transformer
consists of one or more of the following
when attached to or otherwise
assembled with one another: The steel
core or shell, the windings, electrical
insulation between the windings, the
mechanical frame for an LPT.
The product definition encompasses
all such LPTs regardless of name
1 See Large Power Transformers from the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
53177 (August 31, 2012) (the Order).
2 See Large Power Transformers from the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR
13432 (March 13, 2017) (2014/2015 Final Results).
3 See Large Power Transformers from the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR
11679 (March 16, 2018) (2015–2016 Final Results).
4 See Large Power Transformers from the
Republic of Korea: Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review, 82 FR 57210
(December 4, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24973
designation, including but not limited to
step-up transformers, step-down
transformers, autotransformers,
interconnection transformers, voltage
regulator transformers, rectifier
transformers, and power rectifier
transformers.
The LPTs subject to this Order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080, and
8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this Order is dispositive.
Methodology
We are conducting this CCR in
accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the
Act. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our analysis,
see the accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.5
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216,
we preliminarily determine that HEES is
the successor-in-interest to HHI. Record
evidence, as submitted by HHI and
HEES (collectively, Hyundai), indicates
that, based on the totality of the
circumstances under Commerce’s
successor-in-interest criteria, HEES’s
day-to-day operations, corporate and
management structure, and ownership
are materially similar to those of HHI
before the spin-off with respect to the
merchandise under review. Moreover,
we preliminarily find that HEES
assumed HHI’s production facilities,
supplier relationships, and the customer
base with regard to the merchandise
under review. For the complete
successor-in-interest analysis, including
discussion of business proprietary
information, refer to the accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Therefore, based on record evidence,
we preliminarily determine that as the
successor-in-interest to HHI, HEES
should receive the same antidumping
duty treatment with respect to the
subject merchandise as HHI, and that
the rate assigned to HHI is the rate for
HEES as a result of our successor-ininterest finding.
Further, as a result of Hyundai’s
corporate reorganization, HEES has been
5 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled
‘‘Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances
Review Regarding Successor-In-Interest Analysis:
Large Power Transformers from the Republic of
Korea’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM
31MYN1
24974
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Notices
entering subject merchandise at the
lower all-others cash deposit rate as
opposed to the cash deposit rate
applicable to HHI. Because we
preliminarily find that HEES is the
successor-in-interest to HHI, we also
preliminarily determine that, as a result
of Hyundai’s business decision to spin
off HEES and for HEES to enter subject
merchandise as the manufacturer and/or
exporter, the efficacy of the Order is
undermined, depriving the domestic
industry of the full magnitude of the
remedy via the payment of appropriate
cash deposits applicable to HHI.
Therefore, to maintain the effectiveness
of the Order and to provide the adequate
relief to the domestic industry, we
preliminarily determine that the unique
facts of this CCR warrant the retroactive
application of the cash deposit rate to
the effective date of the first entry by
HEES. If we continue to reach the same
determination at the final results of this
CCR, we will instruct CBP to collect the
cash deposits accordingly.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Public Comment
19 CFR 351.303(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 May 30, 2018
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b),
351.221(b) and 351.221(c)(3).
Dated: May 24, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Successor-In-Interest Determination
V. Retroactive Application of HHI’s Cash
Deposit Rate to HEES
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–11713 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any
interested party may request a hearing
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. In
accordance with 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may
submit case briefs not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed no
later than five days after the case briefs,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Parties who submit case or rebuttal
briefs are encouraged to submit with
each argument: (1) A statement of the
issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
All comments are to be filed
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS)
and must also be served on interested
parties. Access to ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. An electronically
filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the day on
which it is due.6
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e),
we will intend to issue the final results
of this changed circumstances review no
later than 270 days after the date on
which this review was initiated, or
6 See
within 45 days if all parties agree to our
preliminary finding.
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG229
Taking and Importing of Marine
Mammals
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; five-year affirmative
finding for El Salvador.
AGENCY:
The NMFS Assistant
Administrator (Assistant Administrator)
has issued a five-year affirmative
finding for the Government of El
Salvador under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). This
affirmative finding will allow
importation into the United States of
yellowfin tuna and yellowfin tuna
products harvested in the eastern
tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP) in
compliance with the Agreement on the
International Dolphin Conservation
Program (AIDCP) by purse seine vessels
operating under Salvadoran jurisdiction
or exported from El Salvador. NMFS
bases the affirmative finding
determination on reviews of
documentary evidence submitted by the
Government of El Salvador and by
information obtained from the InterAmerican Tropical Tuna Commission
(IATTC).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This affirmative finding is
effective for the five-year period of April
1, 2018, through March 31, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin Greenman, West Coast Region,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 501
W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. Phone: 562–980–
3264. Email: justin.greenman@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., allows
for importation into the United States of
yellowfin tuna harvested by purse seine
vessels in the ETP under certain
conditions. If requested by the
harvesting nation, the Assistant
Administrator will determine whether
to make an affirmative finding based
upon documentary evidence provided
by the government of the harvesting
nation, the IATTC, or the Department of
State.
The affirmative finding process
requires that the harvesting nation is
meeting its obligations under the AIDCP
and its obligations of membership in the
IATTC. Every five years, the government
of the harvesting nation must request a
new affirmative finding and submit the
required documentary evidence directly
to the Assistant Administrator. On an
annual basis, NMFS reviews the
affirmative finding and determines
whether the harvesting nation continues
to meet the requirements. A nation may
provide information related to
compliance with AIDCP and IATTC
measures directly to NMFS on an
annual basis or may authorize the
IATTC to release the information to
NMFS to annually renew an affirmative
finding determination without an
application from the harvesting nation.
An affirmative finding will be
terminated, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, if the Assistant
Administrator determines that the
requirements of 50 CFR 216.24(f) are no
longer being met or that a nation is
consistently failing to take enforcement
actions on violations, thereby
diminishing the effectiveness of the
AIDCP.
As a part of the affirmative finding
process set forth in 50 CFR 216.24(f)(8),
the Assistant Administrator considered
documentary evidence submitted by the
Government of El Salvador and obtained
from the IATTC and has determined
that El Salvador has met the MMPA’s
requirements to receive an affirmative
finding.
After consultation with the
Department of State, the Assistant
Administrator issued a five-year
affirmative finding to El Salvador,
allowing the importation into the
United States of yellowfin tuna and
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM
31MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24973-24974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11713]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-867]
Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Notice of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce preliminarily determines that
Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd. (HEES) is the successor-in-
interest to Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI), and that HHI's
current cash deposit rate is the rate applicable for all entries of
large power transformers exported by HEES. Further, we preliminarily
determine that the application of the cash deposit rate applicable to
HEES shall be made retroactively to the effective date of the first
entry by HEES.
DATES: Applicable May 31, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moses Song, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 31, 2012, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published
in the Federal Register an antidumping duty order on large power
transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ HHI is one
of the producers/exporters reviewed in the less-than fair-value
investigation and has been reviewed in each subsequent administrative
review of the Order. During the 2014/2015 administrative review,
covering the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, Commerce
assigned HHI an antidumping duty rate of 60.81 percent, finding that
the application of total adverse facts available (AFA) was
warranted.\2\ In addition, during the 2015/2016 administrative review,
covering the period August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016, Commerce
continued to assign HHI an antidumping duty rate of 60.81 percent,
finding that the application of total AFA was warranted.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea:
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012) (the Order).
\2\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015,
82 FR 13432 (March 13, 2017) (2014/2015 Final Results).
\3\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,
83 FR 11679 (March 16, 2018) (2015-2016 Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(d), on December 4, 2017, Commerce self-
initiated a Changed Circumstances Review (CCR) regarding HHI's new spin
off company, HEES, based on information obtained (1) during the course
of the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 administrative reviews, (2) via public
search and the phone conversation with a representative retained by ABB
Inc.'s (ABB's or the petitioner's) counsel, and (3) from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) data.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 82 FR
57210 (December 4, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of this Order covers large liquid dielectric power
transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal
to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or
unassembled, complete or incomplete.
Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and
any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active
parts of LPTs. The ``active part'' of the transformer consists of one
or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with
one another: The steel core or shell, the windings, electrical
insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT.
The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name
designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step-
down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers,
voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power
rectifier transformers.
The LPTs subject to this Order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080, and 8504.90.9540 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive.
Methodology
We are conducting this CCR in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of
the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
analysis, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ``Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Review Regarding Successor-In-Interest
Analysis: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea''
dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216, we preliminarily determine that
HEES is the successor-in-interest to HHI. Record evidence, as submitted
by HHI and HEES (collectively, Hyundai), indicates that, based on the
totality of the circumstances under Commerce's successor-in-interest
criteria, HEES's day-to-day operations, corporate and management
structure, and ownership are materially similar to those of HHI before
the spin-off with respect to the merchandise under review. Moreover, we
preliminarily find that HEES assumed HHI's production facilities,
supplier relationships, and the customer base with regard to the
merchandise under review. For the complete successor-in-interest
analysis, including discussion of business proprietary information,
refer to the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Therefore, based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine
that as the successor-in-interest to HHI, HEES should receive the same
antidumping duty treatment with respect to the subject merchandise as
HHI, and that the rate assigned to HHI is the rate for HEES as a result
of our successor-in-interest finding.
Further, as a result of Hyundai's corporate reorganization, HEES
has been
[[Page 24974]]
entering subject merchandise at the lower all-others cash deposit rate
as opposed to the cash deposit rate applicable to HHI. Because we
preliminarily find that HEES is the successor-in-interest to HHI, we
also preliminarily determine that, as a result of Hyundai's business
decision to spin off HEES and for HEES to enter subject merchandise as
the manufacturer and/or exporter, the efficacy of the Order is
undermined, depriving the domestic industry of the full magnitude of
the remedy via the payment of appropriate cash deposits applicable to
HHI. Therefore, to maintain the effectiveness of the Order and to
provide the adequate relief to the domestic industry, we preliminarily
determine that the unique facts of this CCR warrant the retroactive
application of the cash deposit rate to the effective date of the first
entry by HEES. If we continue to reach the same determination at the
final results of this CCR, we will instruct CBP to collect the cash
deposits accordingly.
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested
parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the case
briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case
or rebuttal briefs are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities. All comments are to be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) and must also be served
on interested parties. Access to ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the
day on which it is due.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we will intend to issue the
final results of this changed circumstances review no later than 270
days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45
days if all parties agree to our preliminary finding.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b), 351.221(b) and 351.221(c)(3).
Dated: May 24, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Successor-In-Interest Determination
V. Retroactive Application of HHI's Cash Deposit Rate to HEES
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-11713 Filed 5-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P