Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 24743-24745 [2018-11711]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: May 23, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The scope covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The following products are excluded from the scope: (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex (more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bicomponent polyester fiber having a polyester fiber component that melts at a lower temperature than the other polyester fiber component, which is currently classifiable under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015. Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Selection and Corroboration of the Adverse Facts Available Rate Applied to the China-Wide Entity VI. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates VII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Selections for PTA Comment 2: Hailun and Huahong’s Double Remedy Adjustments Comment 3: Calculations for Hailun’s Purchased and Consigned PET Melt VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–11714 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–893] Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. DATES: Applicable May 30, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karine Gziryan or Celeste Chen, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4081 of (202) 482–0890 respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 5, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of this antidumping duty investigation, as provided by section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce preliminarily found that fine denier PSF from Korea was sold at LTFV.1 A summary of the events that have occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by interested parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 83 FR 660 (January 5, 2018), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (collectively, Preliminary Determination). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Less Than Fair Value,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24743 ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/. Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. The revised deadline for the final determination in this investigation is now May 23, 2018.3 Scope Comments We provided parties an opportunity to provide comments on all issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).4 Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Preliminary Determination.5 For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttals submitted to the record of this investigation, and our accompanying discussion and analysis of the comments and rebuttals that were timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.6 Based on parties’ comments, we made no changes to the scope of the investigation, as it appeared in the Preliminary Determination.7 The product covered by this investigation is fine denier PSF from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. 3 See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Due Dates for Case and Rebuttal Briefs Regarding the Scope,’’ dated December 11, 2017 5 See Preliminary Determination. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of China, India, Republic of Taiwan, and Korea: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final Determinations,’’ dated January 16, 2018 (Final Scope Memorandum). 7 While we made no changes to the scope based on parties’ comments, we discovered that we inadvertently included the phrase ‘‘or pre-opened’’ in the scope in the Preliminary Determination. This phrase was not included in the scope in the Initiation (see Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Korea, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (Initiation). We have corrected this error by removing the phrase ‘‘or pre-opened’’ from the scope for this final determination. E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 24744 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices All-Others Rate Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, from January 15 through 19, 2018, we conducted a verification of the information reported by the mandatory respondent Toray Chemical Korea Inc. (TCK), for use in this final determination.8 We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records and original source documents provided by the respondent. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is attached to this notice as Appendix II. Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) As in the Preliminary Determination, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce has continued to base Huvis Corporation’s (Huvis) and Down Nara, Co., Ltd.’s (Down Nara) dumping margin on the facts otherwise available, with an adverse inference, because the companies did not respond to Commerce’s questionnaire or otherwise participate in the investigation.9 In addition, as part of the AFA determination with respect to Down Nara, Commerce has determined that Koreco Synthetic Fiber Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Down Nara and we have updated the rate chart below accordingly.10 Changes Since the Preliminary Determination sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the dumping margin calculations for TCK. For further discussion, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Sales Response of Toray Chemical Korea Inc. in the Antidumping Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated March 7, 2018; and Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of Toray Chemical Korea, Inc. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated March 22, 2018. 9 See Huvis’ Letter, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent Not to Participate,’’ dated August 10, 2017 and Down Nara did not respond to Commerce’s AD questionnaire. 10 For further information, see Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2 and memorandum ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea: Proprietary Discussion of Issues Contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ dated concurrently with this Federal Register notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 liquidation of all appropriate entries of fine denier PSF from Korea as described Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act in Appendix I of this notice, which were provides that in the final determination Commerce shall determine an estimated entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 5, all-others rate for all exporters and 2018, the date of publication of the producers not individually examined. Preliminary Determination of this This rate shall be an amount equal to investigation in the Federal Register. the weighted average of the estimated Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) weighted-average dumping margins of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated zero and de minimis margins, and any weighted-average dumping margin or margins determined entirely under the estimated all-others rate, as follows: section 776 of the Act. Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal Act, if the estimated weighted-average to the respondent-specific estimated dumping margins established for all weighted-average dumping margins exporters and producers individually determined in this final determination; examined are zero, de minimis or (2) if the exporter is not a respondent determined based entirely on facts otherwise available, Commerce may use identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal any reasonable method to establish the to the respondent-specific estimated estimated weighted-average dumping weighted-average dumping margin margin for all-other producers and/or established for that producer of the exporters, including averaging the subject merchandise, except as estimated weighted average dumping explained below; and (3) the cash margins determined for the exporters deposit rate for all other producers and/ and producers individually or exporters will be equal to the allinvestigated.’’ Because (1) the dumping margin for Huvis Corporation and Down others estimated weighted-average dumping margin. Nara, Co., Ltd. is based on AFA and (2) Because the estimated weightedthe dumping margin for Toray Chemical average dumping margin for TCK is Kora Inc. (TCK) is zero, pursuant to zero, entries of shipments of subject section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we merchandise both produced and calculated the ‘‘all-others’’’ rate as a exported by TCK will not be subject to simple average of the dumping margins suspension of liquidation or cash of Huvis Corporation, Down Nara, Co., deposit requirements. In such Ltd. and TCK. situations, Commerce applies the Final Determination exclusion to the provisional measures to the producer/exporter combination that Commerce determines that the was examined in the investigation. following estimated weighted-average Accordingly, Commerce is directing dumping margins exist: CBP to not suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise exported Estimated weightedand produced by TCK. Entries of average shipments of subject merchandise from Exporter/producer dumping TCK in any other producer/exporter margin combination, or by third parties that (percent) sourced subject merchandise from the Toray Chemical Korea Inc .... 0.00 excluded producer/exporter Huvis Corporation ................. 45.23 combination, are subject to the Down Nara, Co., Ltd., Downprovisional measures at the all-others Nara, Co., Ltd. (AKA rate. Koreco Synthetic Fiber Because the final estimated weightedCo., Ltd.) ........................... 45.23 All-Others .............................. 30.15 average dumping margin for subject merchandise exported and produced by TCK is zero, entries of shipments of Consistent with section 735(a)(4) of subject merchandise from this producer/ the Act, based on the zero rate for TCK, Commerce determined that TCK has not exporter combination will be excluded from the antidumping duty order. This sold merchandise which it produced exclusion is not applicable to and exported at LTFV. merchandise exported to the United Suspension of Liquidation States by TCK in any other producer/ In accordance with section exporter combinations or by third 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will parties that sourced subject instruct U.S. Customs and Border merchandise from the excluded Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend producer/exporter combination. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties its calculations and analysis performed in this final determination within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative determination. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2)(B) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of fine denier PSF from Korea no later than 45 days after Commerce’s final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on appropriate imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 Dated: May 23, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The scope covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The following products are excluded from the scope: (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex (more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bicomponent polyester fiber having a polyester fiber component that melts at a lower temperature than the other polyester fiber component, which is currently classifiable under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015. Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues Comment 1: Whether to Apply Total AFA to TCK Based on Verification Comment 1(a): Minor Corrections Comment 1(b): Tolling Arrangement Comment 1(c): Misreported Sales of Products Not Produced Comment 1(d): Failure to Provide Correct Translations Comment 2: Whether to Apply AFA to Down Nara Comment 3: Whether Commerce’s Calculation of the ‘‘All-Others’’ Rate is Supported by its Practice and Is Consistent with the Statute and Court Precedent Comment 4: Whether the Totality of Circumstances Regarding Cost Reporting Warrants Application of Total or Partial AFA. Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Purchases of EG for Physical Inventory Adjustments and Certain Ancillary Costs. Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Adjust TCK’s Reported Unit Costs of Manufacture for the Subject Fine Denier PSF Comment 6(a): Pattern of Understatement Comment 6(b): Physical Characteristics Comment 6(c): SAP® System Comment 6(d): PET Chips Comment 6(e): TPA Consumption Comment 6(f): Affiliated PET Chips Purchases PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24745 Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Affiliated Trading Company’s SG&A Expense Rate Calculation Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Cost and Sales of Certain Product Codes Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Deny the Offset to G&A Expenses Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Non-Operating Income Used to Offset the G&A and Financial Expenses Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Apply the Affiliated Party Purchases Adjustment Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Eliminate the Unreconciled Difference Adjustment to TCK’s Reported Costs III. Background IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Discussion of the Issues VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–11711 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–860] Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from Taiwan is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. DATES: Applicable May 30, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On January 5, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of this antidumping duty investigation, as provided by section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce preliminarily found that fine denier PSF from Taiwan was sold at LTFV.1 A 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM Continued 30MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24743-24745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-893]


Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: 
Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that fine 
denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from the Republic of 
Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States 
at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is 
April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017.

DATES: Applicable May 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karine Gziryan or Celeste Chen, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4081 of (202) 482-0890 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On January 5, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Determination of this antidumping duty investigation, as provided by 
section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce 
preliminarily found that fine denier PSF from Korea was sold at 
LTFV.\1\ A summary of the events that have occurred since Commerce 
published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion 
of the issues raised by interested parties for this final 
determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ 
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, 
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main 
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea: 
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of 
Provisional Measures, 83 FR 660 (January 5, 2018), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (collectively, Preliminary 
Determination).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from 
Korea: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative 
Determination in the Less Than Fair Value,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the 
duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 
through 22, 2018. The revised deadline for the final determination in 
this investigation is now May 23, 2018.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of 
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been 
extended by three days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope Comments

    We provided parties an opportunity to provide comments on all 
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\4\ Certain interested 
parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in 
the Preliminary Determination.\5\ For a summary of the product coverage 
comments and rebuttals submitted to the record of this investigation, 
and our accompanying discussion and analysis of the comments and 
rebuttals that were timely received, see the Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum.\6\ Based on parties' comments, we made no changes to the 
scope of the investigation, as it appeared in the Preliminary 
Determination.\7\ The product covered by this investigation is fine 
denier PSF from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Due Dates for Case and Rebuttal Briefs 
Regarding the Scope,'' dated December 11, 2017
    \5\ See Preliminary Determination.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from 
the People's Republic of China, India, Republic of Taiwan, and 
Korea: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Determinations,'' dated January 16, 2018 (Final Scope Memorandum).
    \7\ While we made no changes to the scope based on parties' 
comments, we discovered that we inadvertently included the phrase 
``or pre-opened'' in the scope in the Preliminary Determination. 
This phrase was not included in the scope in the Initiation (see 
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of 
China, India, the Republic of Korea, Korea, and the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value 
Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (Initiation). We have corrected this 
error by removing the phrase ``or pre-opened'' from the scope for 
this final determination.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24744]]

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, from January 15 through 
19, 2018, we conducted a verification of the information reported by 
the mandatory respondent Toray Chemical Korea Inc. (TCK), for use in 
this final determination.\8\ We used standard verification procedures, 
including an examination of relevant accounting and production records 
and original source documents provided by the respondent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Sales Response of 
Toray Chemical Korea Inc. in the Antidumping Investigation of Fine 
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,'' dated 
March 7, 2018; and Memorandum, ``Verification of the Cost Response 
of Toray Chemical Korea, Inc. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation 
of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,'' 
dated March 22, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were 
submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is attached to this 
notice as Appendix II.

Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)

    As in the Preliminary Determination, pursuant to section 776(a) and 
(b) of the Act, Commerce has continued to base Huvis Corporation's 
(Huvis) and Down Nara, Co., Ltd.'s (Down Nara) dumping margin on the 
facts otherwise available, with an adverse inference, because the 
companies did not respond to Commerce's questionnaire or otherwise 
participate in the investigation.\9\ In addition, as part of the AFA 
determination with respect to Down Nara, Commerce has determined that 
Koreco Synthetic Fiber Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Down 
Nara and we have updated the rate chart below accordingly.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Huvis' Letter, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from 
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent Not to Participate,'' dated 
August 10, 2017 and Down Nara did not respond to Commerce's AD 
questionnaire.
    \10\ For further information, see Issues and Decision Memorandum 
at Comment 2 and memorandum ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fine 
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea: 
Proprietary Discussion of Issues Contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum'' dated concurrently with this Federal Register 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to 
the dumping margin calculations for TCK. For further discussion, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that in the final 
determination Commerce shall determine an estimated all-others rate for 
all exporters and producers not individually examined. This rate shall 
be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-
average dumping margins established for exporters and producers 
individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, 
and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act.
    Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, if the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for all exporters and 
producers individually examined are zero, de minimis or determined 
based entirely on facts otherwise available, Commerce may use any 
reasonable method to establish the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margin for all-other producers and/or exporters, including averaging 
the estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the 
exporters and producers individually investigated.'' Because (1) the 
dumping margin for Huvis Corporation and Down Nara, Co., Ltd. is based 
on AFA and (2) the dumping margin for Toray Chemical Kora Inc. (TCK) is 
zero, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we calculated the 
``all-others''' rate as a simple average of the dumping margins of 
Huvis Corporation, Down Nara, Co., Ltd. and TCK.

Final Determination

    Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Estimated
                                                             weighted-
                    Exporter/producer                         average
                                                          dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toray Chemical Korea Inc................................            0.00
Huvis Corporation.......................................           45.23
Down Nara, Co., Ltd., Down-Nara, Co., Ltd. (AKA Koreco             45.23
 Synthetic Fiber Co., Ltd.).............................
All-Others..............................................           30.15
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with section 735(a)(4) of the Act, based on the zero 
rate for TCK, Commerce determined that TCK has not sold merchandise 
which it produced and exported at LTFV.

Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to 
suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of fine denier PSF from 
Korea as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 5, 2018, 
the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination of this 
investigation in the Federal Register. Further, pursuant to section 
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), Commerce will instruct 
CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin or the estimated all-others rate, as follows: (1) The 
cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal to the 
respondent-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margins 
determined in this final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a 
respondent identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit 
rate will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated weighted-
average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject 
merchandise, except as explained below; and (3) the cash deposit rate 
for all other producers and/or exporters will be equal to the all-
others estimated weighted-average dumping margin.
    Because the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for TCK is 
zero, entries of shipments of subject merchandise both produced and 
exported by TCK will not be subject to suspension of liquidation or 
cash deposit requirements. In such situations, Commerce applies the 
exclusion to the provisional measures to the producer/exporter 
combination that was examined in the investigation. Accordingly, 
Commerce is directing CBP to not suspend liquidation of entries of 
subject merchandise exported and produced by TCK. Entries of shipments 
of subject merchandise from TCK in any other producer/exporter 
combination, or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from 
the excluded producer/exporter combination, are subject to the 
provisional measures at the all-others rate.
    Because the final estimated weighted-average dumping margin for 
subject merchandise exported and produced by TCK is zero, entries of 
shipments of subject merchandise from this producer/exporter 
combination will be excluded from the antidumping duty order. This 
exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United 
States by TCK in any other producer/exporter combinations or by third 
parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/
exporter combination.

[[Page 24745]]

    These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect 
until further notice.

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties its calculations 
and analysis performed in this final determination within five days of 
any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within 
five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify 
the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative 
determination. Because the final determination in this proceeding is 
affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2)(B) of the Act, the 
ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic 
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with 
material injury, by reason of imports of fine denier PSF from Korea no 
later than 45 days after Commerce's final determination. If the ITC 
determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not 
exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all securities posted will 
be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does 
exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to 
assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on 
appropriate imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the 
suspension of liquidation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the 
return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial 
protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
    This determination and this notice are issued and published 
pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.210(c).

    Dated: May 23, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is fine denier 
polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, 
measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The scope 
covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The 
following products are excluded from the scope:
    (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex (more than 3 
denier, inclusive) currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 
5503.20.0065.
    (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bi-component polyester fiber 
having a polyester fiber component that melts at a lower temperature 
than the other polyester fiber component, which is currently 
classifiable under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015.
    Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading 
5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
scope of this investigation is dispositive.

Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
    Comment 1: Whether to Apply Total AFA to TCK Based on 
Verification
    Comment 1(a): Minor Corrections
    Comment 1(b): Tolling Arrangement
    Comment 1(c): Misreported Sales of Products Not Produced
    Comment 1(d): Failure to Provide Correct Translations
    Comment 2: Whether to Apply AFA to Down Nara
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce's Calculation of the ``All-Others'' 
Rate is Supported by its Practice and Is Consistent with the Statute 
and Court Precedent
    Comment 4: Whether the Totality of Circumstances Regarding Cost 
Reporting Warrants Application of Total or Partial AFA.
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Purchases of EG 
for Physical Inventory Adjustments and Certain Ancillary Costs.
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Adjust TCK's Reported Unit 
Costs of Manufacture for the Subject Fine Denier PSF
    Comment 6(a): Pattern of Understatement
    Comment 6(b): Physical Characteristics
    Comment 6(c): SAP[supreg] System
    Comment 6(d): PET Chips
    Comment 6(e): TPA Consumption
    Comment 6(f): Affiliated PET Chips Purchases
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Affiliated Trading 
Company's SG&A Expense Rate Calculation
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Cost and Sales of 
Certain Product Codes
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Deny the Offset to G&A 
Expenses
    Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Non-Operating 
Income Used to Offset the G&A and Financial Expenses
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Apply the 
Affiliated Party Purchases Adjustment
    Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Eliminate the Unreconciled 
Difference Adjustment to TCK's Reported Costs
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Discussion of the Issues
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-11711 Filed 5-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.