Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; BMW of North America, LLC, 22742-22743 [2018-10428]
Download as PDF
22742
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 / Notices
New Jersey Avenue SE, W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by July 2,
2018 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered if
practicable.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy. See
also https://www.regulations.gov/
privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–10444 Filed 5–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; BMW of North America, LLC
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the BMW of North America, LLC’s
(BMW) petition for exemption of the 8
series vehicle line in accordance with
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the Agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
vehicle line as standard equipment is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
(Theft Prevention Standard). BMW also
requested confidential treatment for
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 May 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
specific information in its petition.
Therefore, no confidential information
provided for purposes of this notice has
been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2019 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, West Building,
Room W43–439, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s telephone number is 202–366–
5222. Her fax number is 202–493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated January 12, 2018, BMW
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the 8 series
vehicle line beginning with MY 2019.
The petition requested an exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, BMW
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for its 8 series vehicle
line. BMW stated that its 8 series
vehicle line will be installed with a
passive, electronically-coded, vehicle
immobilizer system (EWS) as standard
equipment that will prevent the vehicle
from being driven away under its own
engine power. Key features of the
antitheft device will include a remotecontrol w/mechanical key, ring antenna
(transponder coil), low frequency
antenna (LF), engine control unit (DME/
DDE) with encoded start release input,
a passive immobilizer, and an EWS
(BDC) control unit. BMW also stated
that it will not offer an audible or visible
alarm feature on the proposed device.
BMW’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of Part 543.6, BMW
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its device. To ensure
reliability and durability of its device,
BMW stated that it conducted tests on
the antitheft device which complied
with its own specific standards. BMW
further stated that its antitheft device
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
fulfills the requirements of the January
1995 European vehicle insurance
companies. In further addressing the
reliability and durability of its device,
BMW provided information on the
uniqueness of its mechanical keys to be
used on the 8 series vehicle line.
Specifically, BMW stated that the
vehicle’s mechanical keys are unique
because they require a special key
blank, cutting machine and a unique
vehicle code to allow for key
duplication. BMW also stated that the
mechanical keys cannot be used to
deactivate the device but that activation
must be done electronically. BMW
further stated that the new keys will
only be issued to authorized persons
and will incorporate special guide-way
millings, making the locks almost
impossible to pick and the keys
impossible to duplicate on the open
market.
BMW stated that activation of its
antitheft device occurs automatically
when the engine is shut off and the
vehicle key is removed from the ignition
system. BMW stated that a transponder
(transmitter/receiver) in the radio
frequency remote control communicates
with the EWS (BDC) control unit
providing the interface to the loop
antenna (coil), engine control unit and
starter. After an initial starting value,
the authentication uses the challenge
response technique with symmetric
secret key. BMW further stated that
when the control unit identifies the
correct release signal, the ignition signal
and fuel supply are released allowing
operation of the vehicle.
BMW also stated that the vehicle is
equipped with a central-locking system
that can be operated to lock and unlock
all doors or to unlock only the driver’s
door, preventing forced entry into the
vehicle through the passenger doors.
BMW further stated that the vehicle can
be further secured by locking the doors
and hood using either the key-lock
cylinder on the driver’s door or the
remote frequency remote control. BMW
stated that the frequency for the remote
control constantly changes to prevent an
unauthorized person from opening the
vehicle by intercepting the signals of its
remote control.
BMW further stated that all of its
vehicles are currently equipped with
antitheft devices as standard equipment,
including its 8 series vehicle line. BMW
compared the effectiveness of its
antitheft device with devices which
NHTSA has previously determined to be
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as would
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541. Specifically,
BMW has installed its antitheft device
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 / Notices
on its X1 (MPV and passenger cars), X2,
X3, X4 and X5 vehicle lines, as well as
its Carline 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Z4, MINI and
MINI Countryman vehicle lines, all
which have been granted parts-marking
exemptions by the Agency. BMW asserts
that theft data have indicated a decline
in theft rates for vehicle lines that have
been equipped with antitheft devices
similar to that which it proposes to
install on the 8 series vehicle line. BMW
stated that for MY/CY 2014, the
Agency’s data show that the theft rates
for its vehicle lines are: 0.47 (2-series),
0.91 (3-series), 0.80 (4-series), 0.90 (5series), 1.83 (6-series) 2.85 (7-series),
0.30 (X1), 0.60 (X3), 0.00 (X5), 0.43 (Z4),
0.00 (i3), 0.00 (i8) and 0.41 (MINI
Cooper). Using an average of 3 MYs data
(2012–2014), NHTSA’s theft rates for
BMW’s 2 series, 3 series, 4 series, 5
series, 6 series, 7 series, X1, X3, X5, Z4,
i3, i8 and MINI Cooper vehicle lines are
0.7416, 0.7566, 0.8041, 1.0805, 2.5509,
2.0632, 0.2672, 0.6117, 0.0000, 0.8159,
0.0000, 0.0000 and 0.2379 respectively,
all below the median theft rate of
3.5826.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by BMW, the Agency believes
that the antitheft device for the BMW 8
series vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541). The Agency concludes that the
device will provide four of the five
types of performance listed in
§ 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of
the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7 (b), the Agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon supporting evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541. The Agency
finds that BMW has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the 8 series vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information
BMW provided about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the Agency
hereby grants in full BMW’s petition for
exemption for the MY 2019 8 series
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 May 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The
Agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given MY. 49
CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication
requirements incident to the disposition
of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future
product nameplates, the beginning
model year for which the petition is
granted and a general description of the
antitheft device is necessary in order to
notify law enforcement agencies of new
vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
If BMW decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the Agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked as
required by 49 CFR parts 541.5 and
541.6 (marking of major component
parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if BMW wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption.
Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the antitheft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for
the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify
an exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The Agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
Agency did not intend Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the Agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2018–10428 Filed 5–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22743
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2018–0052]
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition,
DP17–002
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect
investigation.
AGENCY:
This document denies a
January 11, 2017, petition, as submitted
under Office of Defects Investigation
(ODI) ID number 10944318, from Ms.
Laura Nagel of Springfield, VA,
requesting that the agency open an
investigation into an alleged defect
resulting in engine stall without
warning after refueling in a model year
(MY) 2007 Jeep Patriot. The petitioner’s
vehicle is a 2007 Jeep Patriot. The
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) evaluated the
petition by analyzing consumer
complaints submitted to the Agency, by
reviewing two prior evaluations of the
same apparent defect issue, and by
reviewing technical and field
information provided by FCA US, LLC
(FCA) in response to an information
request letter from the Agency. After
completing this evaluation, NHTSA has
concluded that further investigation of
the alleged defect in the subject vehicles
is unlikely to result in a determination
that a safety related defect exists. The
agency accordingly denies the petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Abhijit Sengupta, Office of Defects
Investigation, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366–4293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Alleged Defect
The petitioner alleges that her MY
2007 Jeep Patriot vehicle experienced
multiple incidents of engine stall
without warning shortly after refueling.
The petitioner discovered that the
defective part is a valve that is integral
to the fuel tank, requiring tank
replacement to repair the problem. The
petitioner alleged that stalling without
warning is an unreasonable risk to
motor vehicle safety and requests the
agency take action by opening a
Preliminary Evaluation to fully evaluate
the defect.
Engine Stall Defects
The Safety Act, (Chapter 301 of Title
49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.
30101 et. seq.)) defines motor vehicle
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22742-22743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; BMW of North America, LLC
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the BMW of North America, LLC's
(BMW) petition for exemption of the 8 series vehicle line in accordance
with Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the Agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the vehicle line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard). BMW also requested
confidential treatment for specific information in its petition.
Therefore, no confidential information provided for purposes of this
notice has been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2019 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, West Building, Room W43-439,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
telephone number is 202-366-5222. Her fax number is 202-493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated January 12, 2018, BMW
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the 8 series vehicle line beginning with MY
2019. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment
for the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its
petition, BMW provided a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device for its 8 series vehicle line. BMW stated that its 8 series
vehicle line will be installed with a passive, electronically-coded,
vehicle immobilizer system (EWS) as standard equipment that will
prevent the vehicle from being driven away under its own engine power.
Key features of the antitheft device will include a remote-control w/
mechanical key, ring antenna (transponder coil), low frequency antenna
(LF), engine control unit (DME/DDE) with encoded start release input, a
passive immobilizer, and an EWS (BDC) control unit. BMW also stated
that it will not offer an audible or visible alarm feature on the
proposed device.
BMW's submission is considered a complete petition as required by
49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in
Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of Part 543.6, BMW
provided information on the reliability and durability of its device.
To ensure reliability and durability of its device, BMW stated that it
conducted tests on the antitheft device which complied with its own
specific standards. BMW further stated that its antitheft device
fulfills the requirements of the January 1995 European vehicle
insurance companies. In further addressing the reliability and
durability of its device, BMW provided information on the uniqueness of
its mechanical keys to be used on the 8 series vehicle line.
Specifically, BMW stated that the vehicle's mechanical keys are unique
because they require a special key blank, cutting machine and a unique
vehicle code to allow for key duplication. BMW also stated that the
mechanical keys cannot be used to deactivate the device but that
activation must be done electronically. BMW further stated that the new
keys will only be issued to authorized persons and will incorporate
special guide-way millings, making the locks almost impossible to pick
and the keys impossible to duplicate on the open market.
BMW stated that activation of its antitheft device occurs
automatically when the engine is shut off and the vehicle key is
removed from the ignition system. BMW stated that a transponder
(transmitter/receiver) in the radio frequency remote control
communicates with the EWS (BDC) control unit providing the interface to
the loop antenna (coil), engine control unit and starter. After an
initial starting value, the authentication uses the challenge response
technique with symmetric secret key. BMW further stated that when the
control unit identifies the correct release signal, the ignition signal
and fuel supply are released allowing operation of the vehicle.
BMW also stated that the vehicle is equipped with a central-locking
system that can be operated to lock and unlock all doors or to unlock
only the driver's door, preventing forced entry into the vehicle
through the passenger doors. BMW further stated that the vehicle can be
further secured by locking the doors and hood using either the key-lock
cylinder on the driver's door or the remote frequency remote control.
BMW stated that the frequency for the remote control constantly changes
to prevent an unauthorized person from opening the vehicle by
intercepting the signals of its remote control.
BMW further stated that all of its vehicles are currently equipped
with antitheft devices as standard equipment, including its 8 series
vehicle line. BMW compared the effectiveness of its antitheft device
with devices which NHTSA has previously determined to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of part 541. Specifically, BMW has
installed its antitheft device
[[Page 22743]]
on its X1 (MPV and passenger cars), X2, X3, X4 and X5 vehicle lines, as
well as its Carline 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Z4, MINI and MINI Countryman
vehicle lines, all which have been granted parts-marking exemptions by
the Agency. BMW asserts that theft data have indicated a decline in
theft rates for vehicle lines that have been equipped with antitheft
devices similar to that which it proposes to install on the 8 series
vehicle line. BMW stated that for MY/CY 2014, the Agency's data show
that the theft rates for its vehicle lines are: 0.47 (2-series), 0.91
(3-series), 0.80 (4-series), 0.90 (5-series), 1.83 (6-series) 2.85 (7-
series), 0.30 (X1), 0.60 (X3), 0.00 (X5), 0.43 (Z4), 0.00 (i3), 0.00
(i8) and 0.41 (MINI Cooper). Using an average of 3 MYs data (2012-
2014), NHTSA's theft rates for BMW's 2 series, 3 series, 4 series, 5
series, 6 series, 7 series, X1, X3, X5, Z4, i3, i8 and MINI Cooper
vehicle lines are 0.7416, 0.7566, 0.8041, 1.0805, 2.5509, 2.0632,
0.2672, 0.6117, 0.0000, 0.8159, 0.0000, 0.0000 and 0.2379 respectively,
all below the median theft rate of 3.5826.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by BMW, the Agency
believes that the antitheft device for the BMW 8 series vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). The Agency concludes that the
device will provide four of the five types of performance listed in
Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7 (b), the Agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
supporting evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The Agency
finds that BMW has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the 8 series vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information BMW
provided about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the Agency hereby grants in full BMW's
petition for exemption for the MY 2019 8 series vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The Agency notes that 49
CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted
from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given MY. 49 CFR part 543.7(f)
contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all
Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future
product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is
granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary
in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines
exempted from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If BMW decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the Agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked as required by 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if BMW wishes in the future to modify the device
on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption.
Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption applies only to
vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the line's exemption is based.
Further, Sec. 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission of petitions
``to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one specified in that exemption.''
The Agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The Agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change to the components or design of
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer
contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the Agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
Part 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2018-10428 Filed 5-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P