Franklin Alternative Strategies Funds, et al., 22720-22722 [2018-10383]

Download as PDF sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 22720 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 / Notices coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange proposes to add specificity regarding the general description in its rules regarding market maker obligations of an electronic ROT. The Commission finds that the changes it is making in this regard are consistent with the Act and notes that, as the Exchange maintains, the changes are consistent with the rules of another options exchange.42 The Exchange proposes to reduce the specific quoting requirements for electronic ROTs of the various types. SQTs and RSQTs associated with the same member organization would be collectively required to provide twosided quotations in 60% of the cumulative number of seconds for which that member organization’s assigned option series are open for trading. Specialists (including Remote Specialists) associated with the same member organization would be collectively required to provide twosided quotations in 90% of the cumulative number of seconds for which that member organization’s assigned option series are open for trading. Similarly, Directed SQTs and Directed RSQTs associated with the same member organization would be collectively required to provide twosided quotations in 90% of the cumulative number of seconds for which that member organization’s assigned option series are open for trading. The Exchange would be able to designate a higher percentage for any of these quoting requirements by announcing such percentage in advance. These quoting requirements would apply to all of an electronic ROT’s assigned options on a daily basis. These quoting requirements would be reviewed on a monthly basis, and would allow the Exchange to review the electronic ROT’s daily compliance in the aggregate and determine the appropriate disciplinary action for single or multiple failures to comply with the continuous quoting requirement during the month period. The Commission notes that the proposed rules provide that determining compliance with the continuous quoting requirements on a monthly basis would not relieve the electronic ROT of the obligation to provide continuous twosided quotes on a daily basis, nor would it prohibit the Exchange from taking 42 See BX Rules, Chapter VII, Section 5. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 May 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 disciplinary action against an electronic ROT for failing to meet the continuous quoting requirements each trading day. The Commission finds that the proposed changes to the quoting requirements of electronic ROTs are consistent with the Act. The Exchange believes that the revised requirements will enable electronic ROTs to focus on the options series that need and consume more liquidity than others. To the extent this is true, the proposal will enhance trading opportunities on the Exchange. Moreover, the Commission believes that, although the proposal would reduce the quoting requirements for the various electronic ROTs from their current levels, the proposed changes are consistent, as the Exchange argues, with the market maker quoting requirements in place on other markets.43 The Commission further notes that, notwithstanding the proposed changes to the quoting requirements for Specialists, Directed SQTs, and Directed RSQTs, the revised quoting requirements continue to reflect meaningful market making obligations. Additionally, the proposed rules reflect a balance of rights and obligations consistent with the balance reflected in the rules of other exchanges for market participants fulfilling a similar role.44 In addition, the Commission believes that the proposed changes to provide additional detail about how the Exchange will apply these quoting requirements adds further clarity to the rules. IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,45 that the proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2018– 22), be, and hereby is, approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.46 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–10379 Filed 5–15–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 43 See, e.g, BX Rules, Chapter VII, Sections 6, 14, and 15; NYSE American Rules 925.1NY and 964.1NY; NYSE Arca Rules 6.37B–O and 6.88–O. 44 See, e.g., Nasdaq GEMX Rules 713 and 804; Nasdaq ISE Rules 713 and 804; Nasdaq MRX Rules 713 and 804. See also supra notes 26 and 31 and accompanying text. 45 Id. 46 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 33095; File No. 812–14819] Franklin Alternative Strategies Funds, et al. May 10, 2018. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to: (a) Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) granting an exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements and transactions. Applicants request an order that would supersede a prior order and that would permit certain registered management investment companies to participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility.1 APPLICANTS: Franklin Alternative Strategies Funds, Franklin California Tax-Free Income Fund, Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, Franklin Custodian Funds, Franklin ETF Trust, Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund, Franklin Floating Rate Master Trust, Franklin Fund Allocator Series, Franklin Global Trust, Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund, Franklin High Income Trust, Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Managed Trust, Franklin U.S. Government Money Fund, Franklin Municipal Securities Trust, Franklin Mutual Series Funds, Franklin New York Tax-Free Income Fund, Franklin New York Tax-Free Trust, Franklin Real Estate Securities Trust, Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio, Franklin Strategic Series, Franklin Tax-Free Trust, Franklin Templeton ETF Trust, Franklin Templeton Global Trust, Franklin Templeton International Trust, Franklin Templeton Money Fund Trust, Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin Value Investors Trust, Institutional Fiduciary Trust, Templeton China World Fund, Templeton Developing Markets Trust, Templeton Funds, Templeton Global Investment Trust, Templeton Global Opportunities Trust, Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund, Templeton Growth 1 Franklin Gold Fund, et al., Investment Company Act Release Nos. 24016 (Sept. 16, 1999) and 24080 (Oct. 13, 1999). E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 / Notices sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Fund, Inc., Templeton Income Trust, Templeton Institutional Funds, and The Money Market Portfolios, each an investment company organized as a Delaware statutory trust or a Maryland corporation and registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company, on behalf of all existing series 2 (the ‘‘Open-End Funds’’); Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust, Franklin Universal Trust, Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc., Templeton Emerging Markets Fund, Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund, and Templeton Global Income Fund, each organized as a Delaware statutory trust or a Massachusetts business trust and registered under the Act as a closed-end investment management investment company (the ‘‘Closed-End Funds,’’ 3 and together with the Open-End Funds, the ‘‘Funds’’); Franklin Advisers, Inc., a California corporation; Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited, a United Kingdom company; K2/D&S Management Co., L.L.C., FASA LLC, Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, and Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company; Templeton Asset Management Ltd., a Singapore public company, and Templeton Global Advisors Limited, a Bahamas company; each registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (each an ‘‘Adviser’’). FILING DATES: The application was filed on September 14, 2017, and amended on March 9, 2018. HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission’s Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on June 4, 2018, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a 2 Certain Funds (as defined below) are, and future Funds may be, money market funds that comply with rule 2a–7 of the Act (each a ‘‘Money Market Fund’’). Money Market Funds will not participate as borrowers under the interfund lending facility because they do not need to borrow cash to meet redemptions. 3 The requested order will not permit Closed-End Funds to participate as borrowers in the interfund lending facility. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 May 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 hearing on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Commission’s Secretary. ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090; Applicants: Craig S. Tyle, Esq., Franklin Templeton Investments, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403 and Bruce G. Leto, Esq., Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, 2600 One Commerce Square, Philadelphia, PA 19103. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–6811, or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number, or an applicant using the Company name box, at https:// www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551–8090. Summary of the Application 1. Applicants request an order that would permit the applicants to participate in an interfund lending facility where each Fund could lend money directly to and borrow money directly from other Funds to cover unanticipated cash shortfalls, such as unanticipated redemptions or trade fails.4 The Funds will not borrow under the facility for leverage purposes and the loans’ duration will be no more than 7 days.5 2. Applicants anticipate that the proposed facility would provide a borrowing Fund with a source of liquidity at a rate lower than the bank borrowing rate at times when the cash position of the Fund is insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. In addition, Funds making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn interest at a rate higher than they 4 Applicants request that the order apply to the applicants and to any other registered open-end or closed-end management investment company or series thereof (each a ‘‘Fund’’ and collectively, the ‘‘Funds’’) for which the Advisers or any successorsin-interest thereto or an investment adviser controlling, controlled by, or under common control with any Adviser or any successor-ininterest thereto serves as investment adviser (each such investment adviser, an ‘‘Adviser’’). For purposes of the requested order, ‘‘successor-ininterest’’ is limited to any entity that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the type of a business organization. 5 Any Fund, however, will be able to call a loan on one business day’s notice. PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22721 otherwise could obtain from investing their cash in repurchase agreements or certain other short term money market instruments. Thus, applicants assert that the facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds. 3. Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application. Among others, each Adviser, through a designated committee, would administer the facility as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its duties under the investment advisory and administrative agreements with the Funds and would receive no additional fee as compensation for its services in connection with the administration of the facility. The facility would be subject to oversight and certain approvals by the Funds’ Board, including, among others, approval of the interest rate formula and of the method for allocating loans across Funds, as well as review of the process in place to evaluate the liquidity implications for the Funds. A Fund’s aggregate outstanding interfund loans will not exceed 15% of its net assets, and the Fund’s loans to any one Fund will not exceed 5% of the lending Fund’s net assets.6 4. Applicants assert that the facility does not raise the concerns underlying section 12(d)(1) of the Act given that the Funds are part of the same group of investment companies and there will be no duplicative costs or fees to the Funds.7 Applicants also assert that the proposed transactions do not raise the concerns underlying sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(3), 17(d) and 21(b) of the Act as the Funds would not engage in lending transactions that unfairly benefit insiders or are detrimental to the Funds. Applicants state that the facility will offer both reduced borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all participating Funds and each Fund would have an equal opportunity to borrow and lend on equal terms based on an interest rate formula that is objective and verifiable. With respect to the relief from section 17(a)(2) of the Act, applicants note that any collateral pledged to secure an interfund loan would be subject to the same conditions imposed by any other lender to a Fund that imposes conditions on the quality of or access to collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is another Fund) or the 6 Under certain circumstances, a borrowing Fund will be required to pledge collateral to secure the loan. 7 Applicants state that the obligation to repay an interfund loan could be deemed to constitute a security for the purposes of sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of the Act. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 22722 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 / Notices sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES same or better conditions (in any other circumstance).8 5. Applicants also believe that the limited relief from section 18(f)(1) of the Act that is necessary to implement the facility (because the lending Funds are not banks) is appropriate in light of the conditions and safeguards described in the application and because the openend Funds would remain subject to the requirement of section 18(f)(1) that all borrowings of the open-end Fund, including combined interfund loans and bank borrowings, have at least 300% asset coverage. 6. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the Commission to exempt any persons or transactions from any provision of the Act if such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt any person, security, or transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities, or transactions, from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the exemption is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors. Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to grant an order permitting a transaction otherwise prohibited by section 17(a) if it finds that (a) the terms of the proposed transaction are fair and reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned; (b) the proposed transaction is consistent with the policies of each registered investment company involved; and (c) the proposed transaction is consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Rule 17d–1(b) under the Act provides that in passing upon an application filed under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the participation of the registered investment company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement or profit sharing plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of the other participants. For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority. Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–10383 Filed 5–15–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 8 Applicants state that any pledge of securities to secure an interfund loan could constitute a purchase of securities for purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 May 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION the most significant parts of such statements. [Release No. 34–83206; File No. SR– CboeBZX–2018–033] A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Under BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4) Shares of the iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF of iShares Trust May 10, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on May 3, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,4 which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal to list and trade under BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4) the shares of the iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (the ‘‘Fund’’) of iShares Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 2 17 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to list and trade shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the Fund under BZX Rule 14.11(c)(4),5 which governs the listing and trading of index fund shares based on fixed income securities indexes.6 The Shares will be offered by the Trust, which was established as a Delaware statutory trust on December 16, 1999. The Trust is registered with the Commission as an open-end investment company and has filed a registration statement on behalf of the Fund on Form N–1A (‘‘Registration Statement’’) with the Commission.7 Rule 14.11(c)(4)(B)(i)(b) requires that component fixed income securities that, in the aggregate, account for at least 75% of the weight of the index or portfolio shall have a minimum principal amount outstanding of $100 million or more. The Exchange submits this proposal because the Underlying 5 The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(c) in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR– BATS–2011–018). 6 The Commission previously has approved proposed rule changes relating to listing and trading of funds based on municipal bond indexes. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78329 (July 14, 2016), 81 FR 47217 (July 20, 2016) (SR– BatsBZX–2016–01) (order approving the listing and trading of the following series of VanEck Vectors ETF Trust: VanEck Vectors AMT-Free 6–8 Year Municipal Index ETF; VanEck Vectors AMT-Free 8– 12 Year Municipal Index ETF; and VanEck Vectors AMT-Free 12–17 Year Municipal Index ETF); 67985 (October 4, 2012), 77 FR 61804 (October 11, 2012) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–92) (order approving proposed rule change relating to the listing and trading of iShares 2018 S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series and iShares 2019 S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series under NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’) Rule 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .02); 72523 (July 2, 2014), 79 FR 39016 (July 9, 2014) (SR–NYSEArca–2014–37) (order approving proposed rule change relating to the listing and trading of iShares 2020 S&P AMTFree Municipal Series under NYSE Arca Rule 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .02); and 75468 (July 16, 2015), 80 FR 43500 (July 22, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca– 2015–25) (order approving proposed rule change relating to the listing and trading of the iShares iBonds Dec 2021 AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF and iShares iBonds Dec 2022 AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF under NYSE Arca Rule 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .02). 7 See Registration Statement on Form N–1A for the Trust, dated January 9, 2018 (File Nos. 333– 92935 and 811–09729). The descriptions of the Fund and the Shares contained herein are based, in part, on information in the Registration Statement. The Commission has issued an order granting certain exemptive relief to the Trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a– 1) (‘‘1940 Act’’) (the ‘‘Exemptive Order’’). See Investment Company Act Release No. 28021 (October 24, 2007) (File No. 812–13426). E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22720-22722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33095; File No. 812-14819]


Franklin Alternative Strategies Funds, et al.

May 10, 2018.
AGENCY:  Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application for an order pursuant to: (a) Section 6(c) 
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') granting an exemption 
from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of 
the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) 
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption from sections 
17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of 
the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit certain joint 
arrangements and transactions. Applicants request an order that would 
supersede a prior order and that would permit certain registered 
management investment companies to participate in a joint lending and 
borrowing facility.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Franklin Gold Fund, et al., Investment Company Act Release 
Nos. 24016 (Sept. 16, 1999) and 24080 (Oct. 13, 1999).

Applicants: Franklin Alternative Strategies Funds, Franklin California 
Tax-Free Income Fund, Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, Franklin 
Custodian Funds, Franklin ETF Trust, Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income 
Fund, Franklin Floating Rate Master Trust, Franklin Fund Allocator 
Series, Franklin Global Trust, Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund, 
Franklin High Income Trust, Franklin Investors Securities Trust, 
Franklin Managed Trust, Franklin U.S. Government Money Fund, Franklin 
Municipal Securities Trust, Franklin Mutual Series Funds, Franklin New 
York Tax-Free Income Fund, Franklin New York Tax-Free Trust, Franklin 
Real Estate Securities Trust, Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio, 
Franklin Strategic Series, Franklin Tax-Free Trust, Franklin Templeton 
ETF Trust, Franklin Templeton Global Trust, Franklin Templeton 
International Trust, Franklin Templeton Money Fund Trust, Franklin 
Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin Value Investors 
Trust, Institutional Fiduciary Trust, Templeton China World Fund, 
Templeton Developing Markets Trust, Templeton Funds, Templeton Global 
Investment Trust, Templeton Global Opportunities Trust, Templeton 
Global Smaller Companies Fund, Templeton Growth

[[Page 22721]]

Fund, Inc., Templeton Income Trust, Templeton Institutional Funds, and 
The Money Market Portfolios, each an investment company organized as a 
Delaware statutory trust or a Maryland corporation and registered under 
the Act as an open-end management investment company, on behalf of all 
existing series \2\ (the ``Open-End Funds''); Franklin Limited Duration 
Income Trust, Franklin Universal Trust, Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc., 
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund, Templeton Emerging Markets Income 
Fund, and Templeton Global Income Fund, each organized as a Delaware 
statutory trust or a Massachusetts business trust and registered under 
the Act as a closed-end investment management investment company (the 
``Closed-End Funds,'' \3\ and together with the Open-End Funds, the 
``Funds''); Franklin Advisers, Inc., a California corporation; Franklin 
Templeton Investment Management Limited, a United Kingdom company; K2/
D&S Management Co., L.L.C., FASA LLC, Franklin Templeton Institutional, 
LLC, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, 
and Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC, each a Delaware limited 
liability company; Templeton Asset Management Ltd., a Singapore public 
company, and Templeton Global Advisors Limited, a Bahamas company; each 
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act 
of 1940 (each an ``Adviser'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Certain Funds (as defined below) are, and future Funds may 
be, money market funds that comply with rule 2a-7 of the Act (each a 
``Money Market Fund''). Money Market Funds will not participate as 
borrowers under the interfund lending facility because they do not 
need to borrow cash to meet redemptions.
    \3\ The requested order will not permit Closed-End Funds to 
participate as borrowers in the interfund lending facility.

Filing Dates:  The application was filed on September 14, 2017, and 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
amended on March 9, 2018.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested 
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. 
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's 
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally 
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 
5:30 p.m. on June 4, 2018, and should be accompanied by proof of 
service on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for 
lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, 
hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any 
facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the 
reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to 
be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the 
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: Craig S. Tyle, Esq., 
Franklin Templeton Investments, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 
94403 and Bruce G. Leto, Esq., Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, 
2600 One Commerce Square, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jean E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at 
(202) 551-6811, or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821 
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The following is a summary of the 
application. The complete application may be obtained via the 
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or an applicant 
using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or 
by calling (202) 551-8090.

Summary of the Application

    1. Applicants request an order that would permit the applicants to 
participate in an interfund lending facility where each Fund could lend 
money directly to and borrow money directly from other Funds to cover 
unanticipated cash shortfalls, such as unanticipated redemptions or 
trade fails.\4\ The Funds will not borrow under the facility for 
leverage purposes and the loans' duration will be no more than 7 
days.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Applicants request that the order apply to the applicants 
and to any other registered open-end or closed-end management 
investment company or series thereof (each a ``Fund'' and 
collectively, the ``Funds'') for which the Advisers or any 
successors-in-interest thereto or an investment adviser controlling, 
controlled by, or under common control with any Adviser or any 
successor-in-interest thereto serves as investment adviser (each 
such investment adviser, an ``Adviser''). For purposes of the 
requested order, ``successor-in-interest'' is limited to any entity 
that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a 
change in the type of a business organization.
    \5\ Any Fund, however, will be able to call a loan on one 
business day's notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Applicants anticipate that the proposed facility would provide a 
borrowing Fund with a source of liquidity at a rate lower than the bank 
borrowing rate at times when the cash position of the Fund is 
insufficient to meet temporary cash requirements. In addition, Funds 
making short-term cash loans directly to other Funds would earn 
interest at a rate higher than they otherwise could obtain from 
investing their cash in repurchase agreements or certain other short 
term money market instruments. Thus, applicants assert that the 
facility would benefit both borrowing and lending Funds.
    3. Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief 
will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application. 
Among others, each Adviser, through a designated committee, would 
administer the facility as a disinterested fiduciary as part of its 
duties under the investment advisory and administrative agreements with 
the Funds and would receive no additional fee as compensation for its 
services in connection with the administration of the facility. The 
facility would be subject to oversight and certain approvals by the 
Funds' Board, including, among others, approval of the interest rate 
formula and of the method for allocating loans across Funds, as well as 
review of the process in place to evaluate the liquidity implications 
for the Funds. A Fund's aggregate outstanding interfund loans will not 
exceed 15% of its net assets, and the Fund's loans to any one Fund will 
not exceed 5% of the lending Fund's net assets.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Under certain circumstances, a borrowing Fund will be 
required to pledge collateral to secure the loan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Applicants assert that the facility does not raise the concerns 
underlying section 12(d)(1) of the Act given that the Funds are part of 
the same group of investment companies and there will be no duplicative 
costs or fees to the Funds.\7\ Applicants also assert that the proposed 
transactions do not raise the concerns underlying sections 17(a)(1), 
17(a)(3), 17(d) and 21(b) of the Act as the Funds would not engage in 
lending transactions that unfairly benefit insiders or are detrimental 
to the Funds. Applicants state that the facility will offer both 
reduced borrowing costs and enhanced returns on loaned funds to all 
participating Funds and each Fund would have an equal opportunity to 
borrow and lend on equal terms based on an interest rate formula that 
is objective and verifiable. With respect to the relief from section 
17(a)(2) of the Act, applicants note that any collateral pledged to 
secure an interfund loan would be subject to the same conditions 
imposed by any other lender to a Fund that imposes conditions on the 
quality of or access to collateral for a borrowing (if the lender is 
another Fund) or the

[[Page 22722]]

same or better conditions (in any other circumstance).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Applicants state that the obligation to repay an interfund 
loan could be deemed to constitute a security for the purposes of 
sections 17(a)(1) and 12(d)(1) of the Act.
    \8\ Applicants state that any pledge of securities to secure an 
interfund loan could constitute a purchase of securities for 
purposes of section 17(a)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Applicants also believe that the limited relief from section 
18(f)(1) of the Act that is necessary to implement the facility 
(because the lending Funds are not banks) is appropriate in light of 
the conditions and safeguards described in the application and because 
the open-end Funds would remain subject to the requirement of section 
18(f)(1) that all borrowings of the open-end Fund, including combined 
interfund loans and bank borrowings, have at least 300% asset coverage.
    6. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the Commission to exempt any 
persons or transactions from any provision of the Act if such exemption 
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with 
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the 
policy and provisions of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act 
provides that the Commission may exempt any person, security, or 
transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities, or 
transactions, from any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the exemption 
is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors. 
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the Commission to grant an order 
permitting a transaction otherwise prohibited by section 17(a) if it 
finds that (a) the terms of the proposed transaction are fair and 
reasonable and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person 
concerned; (b) the proposed transaction is consistent with the policies 
of each registered investment company involved; and (c) the proposed 
transaction is consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Rule 
17d-1(b) under the Act provides that in passing upon an application 
filed under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the 
participation of the registered investment company in a joint 
enterprise, joint arrangement or profit sharing plan on the basis 
proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of 
the Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis 
different from or less advantageous than that of the other 
participants.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
under delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-10383 Filed 5-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.