1112 Partners, LLC, 19853-19854 [2018-09559]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2018 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–09441 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 4902/
803–00239]
1112 Partners, LLC
May 1, 2018.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Cozen O’Connor, One Liberty Place,
1650 Market Street, Suite 2800,
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James D. McGinnis, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551–3025 or Holly L. Hunter-Ceci,
Assistant Chief Counsel, at (202) 551–
6825 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website either at https://www.sec.gov/
rules/iareleases.shtml or by calling (202)
551–8090.
Applicant’s Representations:
1. The Applicant is a recently-formed,
multi-generational single-family office
Notice of application for an exemptive that provides or intends to provide
order under section 202(a)(11)(H) of the services to the family and descendants
of William Render Ford. The Applicant
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
is wholly-owned by Family Clients and
(‘‘Advisers Act’’).
is exclusively controlled (directly and
Applicant: 1112 Partners, LLC (the
indirectly) by one or more Family
‘‘Applicant’’).
Members and/or Family Entities in
Relevant Advisers Act Sections:
compliance with Rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1
Exemption requested under section
(the ‘‘Family Office Rule’’). For
202(a)(11)(H) of the Advisers Act from
purposes of the application, the term
section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act.
‘‘Ford Family’’ means the lineal
Summary of Application: The
Applicant requests that the Commission descendants of William Render Ford,
issue an order declaring it to be a person their spouses or spousal equivalents,
and all other persons and entities that
not within the intent of Section
qualify as ‘‘Family Clients’’ as defined
202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act, which
in paragraph (d)(4) of the Family Office
defines the term ‘‘investment adviser.’’
Filing Dates: The application was
Rule. Unless otherwise indicated,
filed on January 17, 2017, and amended capitalized terms herein have the same
on May 8, 2017; September 15, 2017;
meaning as defined in the Family Office
and March 9, 2018.
Rule.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
2. The Applicant provides both
order granting the application will be
advisory and non-advisory services
issued unless the Commission orders a
(collectively, ‘‘Services’’) to members of
hearing. Interested persons may request the Ford Family. Any Service provided
a hearing by writing to the
by the Applicant that relates to
Commission’s Secretary and serving the investment advice about securities or
Applicant with a copy of the request,
may otherwise be construed as advisory
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
in nature is considered an ‘‘Advisory
should be received by the Commission
Service.’’
by 5:30 p.m. on May 25, 2018, and
3. Prior to forming the Applicant,
should be accompanied by proof of
David B. Ford, Jr. was associated with
service on the Applicant, in the form of
a third-party registered investment
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
adviser (‘‘RIA’’) that for approximately
of service. Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under
eleven (11) years managed substantially
the Advisers Act, hearing requests
all of the advisory accounts of the Ford
should state the nature of the writer’s
Family managed or intended to be
interest, any facts bearing upon the
managed by the Applicant, and among
desirability of a hearing on the matter,
these accounts were accounts of the
the reason for the request, and the issues Additional Family Clients (as defined
contested. Persons may request
below). Effective as of October 1, 2016,
notification of a hearing by writing to
David B. Ford, Jr.’s association with RIA
the Commission’s Secretary.
was terminated. Commencing October 1,
2016, the advisory accounts of the
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Family Clients managed by RIA were
Washington, DC 20549. Applicant, 1112 transition to the Applicant.
4. The Applicant represents that: (i)
Partners, LLC, c/o Ingrid R. Welch, Esq.,
Each of the persons served by the
18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Applicant is a Family Client (i.e., the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 May 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19853
Applicant has no investment advisory
clients other than Family Clients as
required by paragraph (b)(1) of the
Family Office Rule); (ii) the Applicant is
owned and controlled in a manner that
complies in all respects with paragraph
(b)(2) of the Family Office Rule; and (iii)
the Applicant does not hold itself out to
the public as an investment adviser as
required by paragraph (b)(3) of the
Family Office Rule. At the time of the
application, the Applicant represents
that Family Members account for
approximately 100% of the natural
persons to whom the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
5. In addition to the Family Clients,
the Applicant desires to provide
Services (including Advisory Services)
to the parents of a spouse of a lineal
descendant of William Render Ford
(‘‘Parents-in-Law’’), the brother of a
spouse of a lineal descendant of William
Render Ford and his spouse and
children (‘‘Brother-in-Law’’) and
retirement plan accounts of the Parentsin-Law or Brother-in-Law (collectively,
the ‘‘Additional Family Clients’’).
6. The Additional Family Clients do
not have an ownership interest in the
Applicant. The Applicant represents
that the assets beneficially owned by
Family Members and/or Family Entities
(excluding the Additional Family
Clients) would make up at least 90% of
the total assets for which the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
7. The Applicant represents that the
Parents-in-Law and Brother-in-Law have
important familial ties to and are an
integral part of the Ford Family. The
Applicant maintains that including the
Additional Family Clients in the
‘‘family’’ simply recognizes and
memorializes the familial ties and intrafamilial relationships that already exist,
and have existed for fifteen (15) years
and that the inclusion of the Additional
Family Clients as members of the Ford
Family for which the Applicant may
provide Services would be consistent
with the existing familial relationship
among the family members.
The Applicant’s Legal Analysis
1. Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers
Act defines the term ‘‘investment
adviser’’ to mean ‘‘any person who, for
compensation, engages in the business
of advising others, either directly or
through publications or writings, as to
the value of securities or as to the
advisability of investing in, purchasing,
or selling securities, or who, for
compensation and as part of a regular
business, issues or promulgates analyses
or reports concerning securities. . . .’’
2. The Applicant falls within the
definition of an investment adviser
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
19854
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2018 / Notices
under Section 202(a)(11). The Family
Office Rule provides an exclusion from
the definition of investment adviser for
which the Applicant would be eligible
but for the provision of Services to the
Additional Family Clients. Section
203(a) of the Advisers Act requires
investment advisers to register with the
SEC. Because the Applicant has
regulatory assets under management of
more than $100 million, it is not
prohibited from registering with
Commission under Section 203A(a) of
the Advisers Act. Therefore, absent
relief, the Applicant would be required
to register under Section 203(a) of the
Advisers Act.
3. The Applicant submits that its
proposed relationship with the
Additional Family Clients does not
change the nature of the office into that
of a commercial advisory firm. In
support of this argument, the Applicant
notes that if the Parents-in-Law and
Brother-in-Law were the parents and
sibling, respectively of a lineal
descendant, rather than the parents and
sibling, respectively, of a spouse of a
lineal descendant, there would be no
question that each of them would be a
Family Member, and their retirement
assets would similarly fall within the
definition of Family Client. The
Applicant states that in requesting the
order, the office is not attempting to
expand its operations or engage in any
level of commercial activity to which
the Advisers Act is designed to apply.
Although the Additional Family Clients
do not fall within the definition of
Family Member, the Applicant
represents that the Additional Family
Clients for the last fifteen (15) years and
to this day were and continue to be
considered and treated as members of
the Ford Family, and that prior to
forming the Applicant, the RIA had for
some time provided services to the
Additional Family Clients.
Additionally, the Applicant represents
that the number of natural persons who
are not Family Members as a percentage
of the total natural persons to whom the
office would provide Advisory Services
if relief were granted would be less than
9%. From the perspective of the Ford
Family, allowing the Applicant to
provide Services to the Additional
Family Clients is consistent with the
family’s previous experience with
investment management services
provided by the RIA and the existing
family relationship among family
members.
4. The Applicant also submits that
there is no public interest in requiring
the Applicant to be registered under the
Advisers Act. The Applicant states that
the office is a private organization that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 May 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
was formed to be the ‘‘family office’’ for
the Ford Family, and that the office does
not have any public clients. The
Applicant maintains that the office’s
Advisory Services are exclusively
tailored to the needs of the Ford Family
and the Additional Family Clients. The
Applicant argues that the provision of
Advisory Services to the Additional
Family Clients, who have been receiving
Advisory Services from the RIA in the
same manner as other family members
for eleven (11) years, does not create any
public interest that would require the
office to be registered under the
Advisers Act that is different in any
manner than the considerations that
apply to a ‘‘family office’’ that complies
in all respects with the Family Office
Rule.
5. The Applicant argues that, although
the Family Office Rule largely codified
the exemptive orders that the
Commission had previously issued
before the enactment of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, the Commission
recognized in proposing the rule that
the exact representations, conditions, or
terms contained in every exemptive
order could not be captured in a rule of
general applicability. The Commission
noted that family offices would remain
free to seek a Commission exemptive
order to advise an individual or entity
that did not meet the proposed family
client definition, and that certain
situations may raise unique conflicts
and issues that are more appropriately
addressed through an exemptive order
process where the Commission can
consider the specific facts and
circumstances, than through a rule of
general applicability.
6. The Applicant maintains that,
based on its unusual circumstances—
desiring to provide Services to certain
Additional Family Clients who are
relatives that have been considered and
treated as family members for fifteen
(15) years and whose status as clients of
the office would not change the nature
of the office’s operations to that of a
commercial advisory business—an
exemptive order is appropriate based on
the Applicant’s specific facts and
circumstances.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the
Applicant requests an order declaring it
to be a person not within the intent of
Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act.
The Applicant submits that the order is
necessary and appropriate, in the public
interest, consistent with the protection
of investors, and consistent with the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Advisers Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Applicant’s Conditions
1. The Applicant will offer and
provide Advisory Services only to
Family Clients and to the Additional
Family Clients, who generally will be
deemed to be, and be treated as if they
were, Family Clients; provided,
however, that the Additional Family
Clients will be deemed to be, and
treated as if they were, Family Members
for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) and for
purposes of paragraph (d)(4)(vi) of the
Family Office Rule.
2. The Applicant will at all times be
wholly owned by Family Clients and
exclusively controlled (directly or
indirectly) by one or more Family
Members and/or Family Entities
(excluding the Additional Family
Clients’ Family Entities) as defined in
paragraph (d)(5) of the Family Office
Rule.
3. At all times the assets beneficially
owned by Family Members and/or
Family Entities (excluding the
Additional Family Clients’ Family
Entities) will account for at least 90% of
the assets for which the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
4. The Applicant will comply with all
the terms for exclusion from the
definition of investment adviser under
the Advisers Act set forth in the Family
Office Rule except for the limited
exception requested by this Application.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–09559 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #15499 and #15500;
ALABAMA Disaster Number AL–00088]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of Alabama
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a notice of the
presidential declaration of a major
disaster for public assistance only for
the state of Alabama (FEMA–4362–DR),
dated 04/26/2018.
Incident: Severe Storms and
Tornadoes.
Incident Period: 03/19/2018 through
03/20/2018.
DATES: Issued on 04/26/2018.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 06/25/2018.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19853-19854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09559]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 4902/803-00239]
1112 Partners, LLC
May 1, 2018.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of application for an exemptive order under section
202(a)(11)(H) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers
Act'').
Applicant: 1112 Partners, LLC (the ``Applicant'').
Relevant Advisers Act Sections: Exemption requested under section
202(a)(11)(H) of the Advisers Act from section 202(a)(11) of the
Advisers Act.
Summary of Application: The Applicant requests that the Commission
issue an order declaring it to be a person not within the intent of
Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act, which defines the term
``investment adviser.''
Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 17, 2017, and
amended on May 8, 2017; September 15, 2017; and March 9, 2018.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving the Applicant with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on May 25, 2018, and should be accompanied by
proof of service on the Applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the
Advisers Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
may request notification of a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549. Applicant, 1112 Partners, LLC, c/o Ingrid R.
Welch, Esq., Cozen O'Connor, One Liberty Place, 1650 Market Street,
Suite 2800, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James D. McGinnis, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-3025 or Holly L. Hunter-Ceci, Assistant Chief Counsel, at
(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's
Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website either at https://www.sec.gov/rules/iareleases.shtml or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicant's Representations:
1. The Applicant is a recently-formed, multi-generational single-
family office that provides or intends to provide services to the
family and descendants of William Render Ford. The Applicant is wholly-
owned by Family Clients and is exclusively controlled (directly and
indirectly) by one or more Family Members and/or Family Entities in
compliance with Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 (the ``Family Office Rule''). For
purposes of the application, the term ``Ford Family'' means the lineal
descendants of William Render Ford, their spouses or spousal
equivalents, and all other persons and entities that qualify as
``Family Clients'' as defined in paragraph (d)(4) of the Family Office
Rule. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms herein have the
same meaning as defined in the Family Office Rule.
2. The Applicant provides both advisory and non-advisory services
(collectively, ``Services'') to members of the Ford Family. Any Service
provided by the Applicant that relates to investment advice about
securities or may otherwise be construed as advisory in nature is
considered an ``Advisory Service.''
3. Prior to forming the Applicant, David B. Ford, Jr. was
associated with a third-party registered investment adviser (``RIA'')
that for approximately eleven (11) years managed substantially all of
the advisory accounts of the Ford Family managed or intended to be
managed by the Applicant, and among these accounts were accounts of the
Additional Family Clients (as defined below). Effective as of October
1, 2016, David B. Ford, Jr.'s association with RIA was terminated.
Commencing October 1, 2016, the advisory accounts of the Family Clients
managed by RIA were transition to the Applicant.
4. The Applicant represents that: (i) Each of the persons served by
the Applicant is a Family Client (i.e., the Applicant has no investment
advisory clients other than Family Clients as required by paragraph
(b)(1) of the Family Office Rule); (ii) the Applicant is owned and
controlled in a manner that complies in all respects with paragraph
(b)(2) of the Family Office Rule; and (iii) the Applicant does not hold
itself out to the public as an investment adviser as required by
paragraph (b)(3) of the Family Office Rule. At the time of the
application, the Applicant represents that Family Members account for
approximately 100% of the natural persons to whom the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
5. In addition to the Family Clients, the Applicant desires to
provide Services (including Advisory Services) to the parents of a
spouse of a lineal descendant of William Render Ford (``Parents-in-
Law''), the brother of a spouse of a lineal descendant of William
Render Ford and his spouse and children (``Brother-in-Law'') and
retirement plan accounts of the Parents-in-Law or Brother-in-Law
(collectively, the ``Additional Family Clients'').
6. The Additional Family Clients do not have an ownership interest
in the Applicant. The Applicant represents that the assets beneficially
owned by Family Members and/or Family Entities (excluding the
Additional Family Clients) would make up at least 90% of the total
assets for which the Applicant provides Advisory Services.
7. The Applicant represents that the Parents-in-Law and Brother-in-
Law have important familial ties to and are an integral part of the
Ford Family. The Applicant maintains that including the Additional
Family Clients in the ``family'' simply recognizes and memorializes the
familial ties and intra-familial relationships that already exist, and
have existed for fifteen (15) years and that the inclusion of the
Additional Family Clients as members of the Ford Family for which the
Applicant may provide Services would be consistent with the existing
familial relationship among the family members.
The Applicant's Legal Analysis
1. Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act defines the term
``investment adviser'' to mean ``any person who, for compensation,
engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through
publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the
advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities, or
who, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or
promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities. . . .''
2. The Applicant falls within the definition of an investment
adviser
[[Page 19854]]
under Section 202(a)(11). The Family Office Rule provides an exclusion
from the definition of investment adviser for which the Applicant would
be eligible but for the provision of Services to the Additional Family
Clients. Section 203(a) of the Advisers Act requires investment
advisers to register with the SEC. Because the Applicant has regulatory
assets under management of more than $100 million, it is not prohibited
from registering with Commission under Section 203A(a) of the Advisers
Act. Therefore, absent relief, the Applicant would be required to
register under Section 203(a) of the Advisers Act.
3. The Applicant submits that its proposed relationship with the
Additional Family Clients does not change the nature of the office into
that of a commercial advisory firm. In support of this argument, the
Applicant notes that if the Parents-in-Law and Brother-in-Law were the
parents and sibling, respectively of a lineal descendant, rather than
the parents and sibling, respectively, of a spouse of a lineal
descendant, there would be no question that each of them would be a
Family Member, and their retirement assets would similarly fall within
the definition of Family Client. The Applicant states that in
requesting the order, the office is not attempting to expand its
operations or engage in any level of commercial activity to which the
Advisers Act is designed to apply. Although the Additional Family
Clients do not fall within the definition of Family Member, the
Applicant represents that the Additional Family Clients for the last
fifteen (15) years and to this day were and continue to be considered
and treated as members of the Ford Family, and that prior to forming
the Applicant, the RIA had for some time provided services to the
Additional Family Clients. Additionally, the Applicant represents that
the number of natural persons who are not Family Members as a
percentage of the total natural persons to whom the office would
provide Advisory Services if relief were granted would be less than 9%.
From the perspective of the Ford Family, allowing the Applicant to
provide Services to the Additional Family Clients is consistent with
the family's previous experience with investment management services
provided by the RIA and the existing family relationship among family
members.
4. The Applicant also submits that there is no public interest in
requiring the Applicant to be registered under the Advisers Act. The
Applicant states that the office is a private organization that was
formed to be the ``family office'' for the Ford Family, and that the
office does not have any public clients. The Applicant maintains that
the office's Advisory Services are exclusively tailored to the needs of
the Ford Family and the Additional Family Clients. The Applicant argues
that the provision of Advisory Services to the Additional Family
Clients, who have been receiving Advisory Services from the RIA in the
same manner as other family members for eleven (11) years, does not
create any public interest that would require the office to be
registered under the Advisers Act that is different in any manner than
the considerations that apply to a ``family office'' that complies in
all respects with the Family Office Rule.
5. The Applicant argues that, although the Family Office Rule
largely codified the exemptive orders that the Commission had
previously issued before the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Commission recognized in
proposing the rule that the exact representations, conditions, or terms
contained in every exemptive order could not be captured in a rule of
general applicability. The Commission noted that family offices would
remain free to seek a Commission exemptive order to advise an
individual or entity that did not meet the proposed family client
definition, and that certain situations may raise unique conflicts and
issues that are more appropriately addressed through an exemptive order
process where the Commission can consider the specific facts and
circumstances, than through a rule of general applicability.
6. The Applicant maintains that, based on its unusual
circumstances--desiring to provide Services to certain Additional
Family Clients who are relatives that have been considered and treated
as family members for fifteen (15) years and whose status as clients of
the office would not change the nature of the office's operations to
that of a commercial advisory business--an exemptive order is
appropriate based on the Applicant's specific facts and circumstances.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant requests an order
declaring it to be a person not within the intent of Section 202(a)(11)
of the Advisers Act. The Applicant submits that the order is necessary
and appropriate, in the public interest, consistent with the protection
of investors, and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Advisers Act.
The Applicant's Conditions
1. The Applicant will offer and provide Advisory Services only to
Family Clients and to the Additional Family Clients, who generally will
be deemed to be, and be treated as if they were, Family Clients;
provided, however, that the Additional Family Clients will be deemed to
be, and treated as if they were, Family Members for purposes of
paragraph (b)(1) and for purposes of paragraph (d)(4)(vi) of the Family
Office Rule.
2. The Applicant will at all times be wholly owned by Family
Clients and exclusively controlled (directly or indirectly) by one or
more Family Members and/or Family Entities (excluding the Additional
Family Clients' Family Entities) as defined in paragraph (d)(5) of the
Family Office Rule.
3. At all times the assets beneficially owned by Family Members
and/or Family Entities (excluding the Additional Family Clients' Family
Entities) will account for at least 90% of the assets for which the
Applicant provides Advisory Services.
4. The Applicant will comply with all the terms for exclusion from
the definition of investment adviser under the Advisers Act set forth
in the Family Office Rule except for the limited exception requested by
this Application.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09559 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P