North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Review: Notice of Request for Panel Review, 19221-19222 [2018-09266]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Notices
through 22, 2018. If the new deadline
falls on a non-business day, in
accordance with Commerce’s practice,
the deadline will become the next
business day. The revised deadline for
the final results is now May 7, 2018.5
Scope of the Orders
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by these
orders is certain wind towers, whether
or not tapered, and sections thereof.
Certain wind towers are designed to
support the nacelle and rotor blades in
a wind turbine with a minimum rated
electrical power generation capacity in
excess of 100 kilowatts and with a
minimum height of 50 meters measured
from the base of the tower to the bottom
of the nacelle (i.e., where the top of the
tower and nacelle are joined) when fully
assembled.
A wind tower section consists of, at
a minimum, multiple steel plates rolled
into cylindrical or conical shapes and
welded together (or otherwise attached)
to form a steel shell, regardless of
coating, end-finish, painting, treatment,
or method of manufacture, and with or
without flanges, doors, or internal or
external components (e.g., flooring/
decking, ladders, lifts, electrical buss
boxes, electrical cabling, conduit, cable
harness for nacelle generator, interior
lighting, tool and storage lockers)
attached to the wind tower section.
Several wind tower sections are
normally required to form a completed
wind tower.
Wind towers and sections thereof are
included within the scope whether or
not they are joined with nonsubject
merchandise, such as nacelles or rotor
blades, and whether or not they have
internal or external components
attached to the subject merchandise.
Specifically excluded from the scope
are nacelles and roto blades, regardless
of whether they are attached to the wind
tower. Also excluded are any internal or
external components which are not
attached to the wind towers or sections
thereof.
Merchandise covered by the orders is
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff System of the United States
(HTSUS) under subheadings
5 See Memorandum for The Record from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum),
dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been extended by
3 days. In addition, because the deadline falls on
a non-business day (i.e., the weekend), pursuant to
Commerce’s practice, the deadline will become the
next business day. The revised deadline is May 7,
2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 May 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
7308.20.0020 6 or 8502.31.0000.7 Prior
to 2011, merchandise covered by this
review was classified in the HTSUS
under subheading 7308.20.0000 and
may continue to be to some degree.
While HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the subject
merchandise is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in these reviews, including the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping in the event of revocation of
the Orders and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the Orders
were revoked, is provided in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.8 A list of the topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice
as Appendix. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
19221
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: April 26, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–09312 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Orders
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins up to 60.02 percent for
China and up to 58.54 percent for
Vietnam.
International Trade Administration
6 Wind towers are classified under HTSUS
7308.20.0020 when imported as a tower or tower
section(s) alone.
7 Wind towers may also be classified under
HTSUS 8502.31.0000 when imported as part of a
wind turbine (i.e., accompanying nacelles and/or
rotor blades).
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Utility
Scale Wind Towers from the People’s Republic of
China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel
Review: Notice of Request for Panel
Review
United States Section, NAFTA
Secretariat, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of NAFTA Request for
Panel Review in the matter of Large
Residential Washers from Mexico: Final
results of antidumping duty
administrative review (Secretariat File
Number: USA–MEX–2018–1904–04).
AGENCY:
A Request for Panel Review
was filed on behalf of Electrolux Home
Products, Inc., Electrolux Home
Products Corp. N.V., and Electrolux
Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(collectively ‘‘Electrolux’’) with the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
19222
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Notices
United States Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat on April 18, 2018, pursuant
to NAFTA Article 1904. Panel Review
was requested of the Department of
Commerce’s final antidumping duty
determination regarding Large
Residential Washers from Mexico. The
final determination was published in
the Federal Register on March 19, 2018
(83 FR 11,963). The NAFTA Secretariat
has assigned case number USA–MEX–
2018–1904–04 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
E. Morris, United States Secretary,
NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides
a dispute settlement mechanism
involving trade remedy determinations
issued by the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada, and
the Government of Mexico. Following a
Request for Panel Review, a Binational
Panel is composed to review the trade
remedy determination being challenged
and issue a binding Panel Decision.
There are established NAFTA Rules of
Procedure for Article 1904 Binational
Panel Reviews, which were adopted by
the three governments for panels
requested pursuant to Article 1904(2) of
NAFTA which requires Requests for
Panel Review to be published in
accordance with Rule 35. For the
complete Rules, please see https://
www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Textsof-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/
Article-1904.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 39 within 30
days after the filing of the first Request
for Panel Review (the deadline for filing
a Complaint is May 18, 2018);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or
interested person that does not file a
Complaint but that intends to appear in
support of any reviewable portion of the
final determination may participate in
the panel review by filing a Notice of
Appearance in accordance with Rule 40
within 45 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Notice of Appearance is June
4, 2018); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including challenges to the jurisdiction
of the investigating authority, that are
set out in the Complaints filed in the
panel review and to the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 May 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: April 26, 2018.
Paul E. Morris,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2018–09266 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–869]
Large Residential Washers From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
large residential washers (washing
machines) from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Review’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable May 2, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kaitlin Wojnar at (202) 482–3857, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
Commerce published the CVD order
on washing machines from Korea on
February 15, 2013.1 On January 2, 2018,
Commerce initiated this review, the first
five-year (sunset) review of the Order, in
accordance with section 751(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 Whirlpool Corporation, a
domestic producer of washing machines
and the petitioner in the underlying
CVD investigation, subsequently filed a
timely notice of intent to participate.3
Commerce received an adequate and
timely substantive response from the
1 See Large Residential Washers from the
Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 78
FR 11154 (February 15, 2013) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83
FR 100 (January 2, 2018).
3 See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Five-Year
(‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders on Large Residential
Washers from Mexico and the Republic of Korea:
Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ January 17, 2018.
As a domestic producer of washing machines, the
petitioner is an interested party to this proceeding
pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
petitioner on February 5, 2018.4 Neither
the Government of Korea (GOK) nor any
other respondent interested party to this
proceeding submitted a substantive
response. Therefore, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2),
Commerce conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order. As a result
of the tolling of deadlines for the closure
of the Federal Government from January
20 through January 22, 2018, the
deadline for this expedited sunset
review was extended to May 7, 2018.5
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is
washing machines from Korea. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Appendix to this notice.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.6 These
issues include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies, the net
countervailable subsidy rate likely to
prevail upon revocation of the Order,
and the nature of the subsidies. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is available
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit in
Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3)
of the Act, we determine that revocation
of the Order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of net
4 See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Five-Year
(‘Sunset’) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
on Large Residential Washers from Korea:
Substantive Response of Whirlpool Corporation to
the Notice of Initiation of First Sunset Review,’’
February 5, 2018. The petitioner’s response was
filed in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d).
5 See Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines
Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal
Government,’’ January 23, 2018.
6 See Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing
Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from the
Republic of Korea: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Review,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this Federal Register notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19221-19222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904
Binational Panel Review: Notice of Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of NAFTA Request for Panel Review in the matter of Large
Residential Washers from Mexico: Final results of antidumping duty
administrative review (Secretariat File Number: USA-MEX-2018-1904-04).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A Request for Panel Review was filed on behalf of Electrolux
Home Products, Inc., Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V., and
Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively
``Electrolux'') with the
[[Page 19222]]
United States Section of the NAFTA Secretariat on April 18, 2018,
pursuant to NAFTA Article 1904. Panel Review was requested of the
Department of Commerce's final antidumping duty determination regarding
Large Residential Washers from Mexico. The final determination was
published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2018 (83 FR 11,963). The
NAFTA Secretariat has assigned case number USA-MEX-2018-1904-04 to this
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul E. Morris, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides
a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations
issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel
Review, a Binational Panel is composed to review the trade remedy
determination being challenged and issue a binding Panel Decision.
There are established NAFTA Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews, which were adopted by the three governments
for panels requested pursuant to Article 1904(2) of NAFTA which
requires Requests for Panel Review to be published in accordance with
Rule 35. For the complete Rules, please see https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Texts-of-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/Article-1904.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final
determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance
with Rule 39 within 30 days after the filing of the first Request for
Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is May 18, 2018);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or interested person that does
not file a Complaint but that intends to appear in support of any
reviewable portion of the final determination may participate in the
panel review by filing a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule
40 within 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is June 4,
2018); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited to the allegations of error
of fact or law, including challenges to the jurisdiction of the
investigating authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in
the panel review and to the procedural and substantive defenses raised
in the panel review.
Dated: April 26, 2018.
Paul E. Morris,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2018-09266 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P