Certain Subsea Telecommunications Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Correct the Name of a Respondent and Withdrawal of the Complaint as to Other Respondents, 17677-17678 [2018-08369]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2018 / Notices (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the amended complaint is to be served: amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES Bi-Coastal Pharma International LLC, 1161 Broad Street, Suite 216, Shrewsbury, NJ 07702 Bi-Coastal Pharmaceutical Corporation, 1161 Broad Street, Suite 216, Shrewsbury, NJ 07702 ECI Pharmaceuticals LLC, 5311 NW 35th Terrace, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Virtus Pharmaceuticals LLC, 2649 Causeway Center Drive, Tampa, FL 33619 Virtus Pharmaceuticals OPCO II LLC, 1321 Murfreesboro Pike, Nashville, TN 37217–2626 (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the amended complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the amended complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the amended complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the amended complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the amended complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Apr 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 Issued: April 18, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1098] Certain Subsea Telecommunications Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Correct the Name of a Respondent and Withdrawal of the Complaint as to Other Respondents U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), granting complainant’s unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of respondent AlcatelLucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine Networks and withdrawal of the complaint as to respondents Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Commission instituted this investigation on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom; Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas (‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The Notice of Investigation named numerous respondents, including: Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, France. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party in this investigation. On March 8, 2018, complainants filed an unopposed motion to (1) amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine Networks and (2) withdraw the complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC. Complainants note that complainants, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS entered into a joint stipulation concerning the subject matter of the investigation where Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS represented that Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC do not sell, design, or manufacture the accused subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof; and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2018–08395 Filed 4–20–18; 8:45 am] 17677 E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM 23APN1 17678 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2018 / Notices that Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC no longer exists as of January 1, 2018. Based on this stipulation, complainants agreed to withdraw the complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC. On March 19, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting complainants’ motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to amend the complaint and there is no evidence of any prejudice to the parties in the investigation. The ALJ found that no extraordinary circumstances prevent the partial termination of the investigation as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC. None of the parties petitioned for review of the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 17, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–392] Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cayman Chemical Company Notice of application. Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before June 22, 2018. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal DATES: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (‘‘Assistant Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on March 8, 2018, Cayman Chemical Company, 1180 East Ellsworth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2018–08369 Filed 4–20–18; 8:45 am] ACTION: Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES Controlled substance Drug code 3-Fluoro-N-methylcathinone (3–FMC) ..................................................................................................................... Cathinone ................................................................................................................................................................. Methcathinone ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-Fluoro-N-methylcathinone (4–FMC) ..................................................................................................................... Pentedrone (a-methylaminovalerophenone) ........................................................................................................... Mephedrone (4-Methyl-N-methylcathinone) ............................................................................................................ 4-Methyl-N-ethylcathinone (4–MEC) ....................................................................................................................... Naphyrone ............................................................................................................................................................... N-Ethylamphetamine ............................................................................................................................................... N,N-Dimethylamphetamine ...................................................................................................................................... Fenethylline .............................................................................................................................................................. Aminorex .................................................................................................................................................................. 4-Methylaminorex (cis isomer) ................................................................................................................................ Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid ................................................................................................................................... Methaqualone .......................................................................................................................................................... Mecloqualone ........................................................................................................................................................... JWH–250 (1-Pentyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl) indole) .......................................................................................... SR–18 (Also known as RCS–8) (1-Cyclohexylethyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl) indole) ........................................ ADB–FUBINACA (n-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) ..... 5-Flouro-UR–144 and XLR11 [1-(5-Fluoro-pentyl)1H-indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone ........ AB–FUBINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) ............. JWH–019 (1-Hexyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole) .............................................................................................................. MDMB–FUBINACA (Methyl 2-(1-4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamido)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate) ................ 2-(1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1Hindazole-3-carboxamido)-3- methylbutanoate ................................................................... AB–PINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl- ........................................................................................................................ 1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole- ................................................................................................................... 3-carboxamide) ........................................................................................................................................................ THJ–2201 [1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazol-3- ............................................................................................................ yl](naphthalen-1-yl)methanone ................................................................................................................................ AB–CHMINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1- ............................................................................................................... oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)- ....................................................................................................................... 1H-indazole-3-carboxamide ..................................................................................................................................... MAB–CHMINACA (N-(1-amino-3,3dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) 5F–AMB (Methyl 2-(1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazola-3-carboxamido)-3-methylbutanoate) ...................................... 5F–ADB; 5F–MDMB–PINACA (Methyl 2-(1-(5fluoropentyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamido)-3,3dimethylbutanoate) ADB–PINACA (N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) ......................... MDMB–CHMICA, MMB–CHMINACA (Methyl 2-(1-(cyclohenxylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxamido)-3,3dimethylbutanote)- ................................................................................................................................................ APINACA and AKB48 N-(1-Adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide ....................................................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Apr 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM 23APN1 Schedule 1233 1235 1237 1238 1246 1248 1249 1258 1475 1480 1503 1585 1590 2010 2565 2572 6250 7008 7010 7011 7012 7019 7020 7021 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7023 I 7024 I 7031 7032 7033 7034 7035 I I I I I 7042 7048 I I

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17677-17678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1098]


Certain Subsea Telecommunications Systems and Components Thereof; 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation To Correct the Name of a Respondent and Withdrawal of the 
Complaint as to Other Respondents

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend 
the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of 
respondent Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine 
Networks and withdrawal of the complaint as to respondents Nokia 
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia 
Solutions and Networks US LLC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on 
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom; 
Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, 
Texas (``complainants''). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain subsea 
telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of 
infringement of one or more of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent 
No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; 
and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The 
Notice of Investigation named numerous respondents, including: Nokia 
Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of 
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo, 
Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; and 
Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, France. 
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party in this 
investigation.
    On March 8, 2018, complainants filed an unopposed motion to (1) 
amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of 
Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine Networks and 
(2) withdraw the complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., 
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US 
LLC. Complainants note that complainants, Nokia Corporation, Nokia 
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia 
Solutions and Networks US LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks 
SAS entered into a joint stipulation concerning the subject matter of 
the investigation where Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks 
B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks US 
LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS represented that Nokia 
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia 
Solutions and Networks US LLC do not sell, design, or manufacture the 
accused subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof; and

[[Page 17678]]

that Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC no longer exists as of January 
1, 2018. Based on this stipulation, complainants agreed to withdraw the 
complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and 
Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC.
    On March 19, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting 
complainants' motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to amend the 
complaint and there is no evidence of any prejudice to the parties in 
the investigation. The ALJ found that no extraordinary circumstances 
prevent the partial termination of the investigation as to Nokia 
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia 
Solutions and Networks US LLC. None of the parties petitioned for 
review of the subject ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 17, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-08369 Filed 4-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P