Certain Subsea Telecommunications Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Correct the Name of a Respondent and Withdrawal of the Complaint as to Other Respondents, 17677-17678 [2018-08369]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2018 / Notices
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the amended complaint is to be
served:
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Bi-Coastal Pharma International LLC,
1161 Broad Street, Suite 216,
Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Bi-Coastal Pharmaceutical Corporation,
1161 Broad Street, Suite 216,
Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
ECI Pharmaceuticals LLC, 5311 NW
35th Terrace, Fort Lauderdale, FL
33309
Virtus Pharmaceuticals LLC, 2649
Causeway Center Drive, Tampa, FL
33619
Virtus Pharmaceuticals OPCO II LLC,
1321 Murfreesboro Pike, Nashville,
TN 37217–2626
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the amended complaint
and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the amended complaint
and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting
responses to the amended complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
amended complaint and in this notice
may be deemed to constitute a waiver of
the right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the amended complaint and
this notice and to enter an initial
determination and a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of an exclusion
order or a cease and desist order or both
directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Apr 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
Issued: April 18, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1098]
Certain Subsea Telecommunications
Systems and Components Thereof;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend
the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation To Correct the Name of a
Respondent and Withdrawal of the
Complaint as to Other Respondents
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 9) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
granting complainant’s unopposed
motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
correct the name of respondent AlcatelLucent Submarine Networks SAS to
Alcatel Submarine Networks and
withdrawal of the complaint as to
respondents Nokia Solutions and
Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and
Networks US LLC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 26, 2018, based on a
complaint, as supplemented, filed on
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions
Ltd. of the United Kingdom; Neptune
Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom;
and Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas
(‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26,
2018). The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of Section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain subsea
telecommunication systems and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of U.S.
Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent No.
7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171;
U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798; and U.S.
Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
section 337. The Notice of Investigation
named numerous respondents,
including: Nokia Corporation of Espoo,
Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks
B.V. of Hoofddorp, The Netherlands;
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of
Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and
Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona;
and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine
Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt,
France. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations was named as a party in
this investigation.
On March 8, 2018, complainants filed
an unopposed motion to (1) amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
correct the name of Alcatel-Lucent
Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel
Submarine Networks and (2) withdraw
the complaint as to Nokia Solutions and
Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and
Networks US LLC. Complainants note
that complainants, Nokia Corporation,
Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V.,
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy,
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC,
and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine
Networks SAS entered into a joint
stipulation concerning the subject
matter of the investigation where Nokia
Corporation, Nokia Solutions and
Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and
Networks US LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent
Submarine Networks SAS represented
that Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V.,
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC
do not sell, design, or manufacture the
accused subsea telecommunication
systems and components thereof; and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2018–08395 Filed 4–20–18; 8:45 am]
17677
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
17678
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2018 / Notices
that Nokia Solutions and Networks US
LLC no longer exists as of January 1,
2018. Based on this stipulation,
complainants agreed to withdraw the
complaint as to Nokia Solutions and
Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and
Networks US LLC.
On March 19, 2018, the ALJ issued
the subject ID granting complainants’
motion. The ALJ found that good cause
exists to amend the complaint and there
is no evidence of any prejudice to the
parties in the investigation. The ALJ
found that no extraordinary
circumstances prevent the partial
termination of the investigation as to
Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V.,
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC.
None of the parties petitioned for review
of the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 17, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Application: Cayman
Chemical Company
Notice of application.
Registered bulk manufacturers of
the affected basic classes, and
applicants therefore, may file written
comments on or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration on
or before June 22, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
DATES:
The
Attorney General has delegated his
authority under the Controlled
Substances Act to the Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to
exercise all necessary functions with
respect to the promulgation and
implementation of 21 CFR part 1301,
incident to the registration of
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers,
importers, and exporters of controlled
substances (other than final orders in
connection with suspension, denial, or
revocation of registration) has been
redelegated to the Assistant
Administrator of the DEA Diversion
Control Division (‘‘Assistant
Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
In accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33(a), this is notice that on March
8, 2018, Cayman Chemical Company,
1180 East Ellsworth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48108 applied to be registered
as a bulk manufacturer of the following
basic classes of controlled substances:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2018–08369 Filed 4–20–18; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
Register Representative/DRW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Controlled substance
Drug code
3-Fluoro-N-methylcathinone (3–FMC) .....................................................................................................................
Cathinone .................................................................................................................................................................
Methcathinone .........................................................................................................................................................
4-Fluoro-N-methylcathinone (4–FMC) .....................................................................................................................
Pentedrone (a-methylaminovalerophenone) ...........................................................................................................
Mephedrone (4-Methyl-N-methylcathinone) ............................................................................................................
4-Methyl-N-ethylcathinone (4–MEC) .......................................................................................................................
Naphyrone ...............................................................................................................................................................
N-Ethylamphetamine ...............................................................................................................................................
N,N-Dimethylamphetamine ......................................................................................................................................
Fenethylline ..............................................................................................................................................................
Aminorex ..................................................................................................................................................................
4-Methylaminorex (cis isomer) ................................................................................................................................
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid ...................................................................................................................................
Methaqualone ..........................................................................................................................................................
Mecloqualone ...........................................................................................................................................................
JWH–250 (1-Pentyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl) indole) ..........................................................................................
SR–18 (Also known as RCS–8) (1-Cyclohexylethyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl) indole) ........................................
ADB–FUBINACA (n-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) .....
5-Flouro-UR–144 and XLR11 [1-(5-Fluoro-pentyl)1H-indol-3-yl](2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone ........
AB–FUBINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) .............
JWH–019 (1-Hexyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole) ..............................................................................................................
MDMB–FUBINACA (Methyl 2-(1-4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamido)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate) ................
2-(1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1Hindazole-3-carboxamido)-3- methylbutanoate ...................................................................
AB–PINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl- ........................................................................................................................
1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole- ...................................................................................................................
3-carboxamide) ........................................................................................................................................................
THJ–2201 [1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazol-3- ............................................................................................................
yl](naphthalen-1-yl)methanone ................................................................................................................................
AB–CHMINACA (N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1- ...............................................................................................................
oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)- .......................................................................................................................
1H-indazole-3-carboxamide .....................................................................................................................................
MAB–CHMINACA (N-(1-amino-3,3dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide)
5F–AMB (Methyl 2-(1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazola-3-carboxamido)-3-methylbutanoate) ......................................
5F–ADB; 5F–MDMB–PINACA (Methyl 2-(1-(5fluoropentyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamido)-3,3dimethylbutanoate)
ADB–PINACA (N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide) .........................
MDMB–CHMICA,
MMB–CHMINACA
(Methyl
2-(1-(cyclohenxylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxamido)-3,3dimethylbutanote)- ................................................................................................................................................
APINACA and AKB48 N-(1-Adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide .......................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Apr 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Schedule
1233
1235
1237
1238
1246
1248
1249
1258
1475
1480
1503
1585
1590
2010
2565
2572
6250
7008
7010
7011
7012
7019
7020
7021
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7023
I
7024
I
7031
7032
7033
7034
7035
I
I
I
I
I
7042
7048
I
I
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17677-17678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08369]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1098]
Certain Subsea Telecommunications Systems and Components Thereof;
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation To Correct the Name of a Respondent and Withdrawal of the
Complaint as to Other Respondents
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend
the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of
respondent Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine
Networks and withdrawal of the complaint as to respondents Nokia
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia
Solutions and Networks US LLC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on January 26, 2018, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on
behalf of Neptune Subsea Acquisitions Ltd. of the United Kingdom;
Neptune Subsea IP Ltd. of the United Kingdom; and Xtera, Inc. of Allen,
Texas (``complainants''). 83 FR 3370 (Jan. 26, 2018). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain subsea
telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,068; U.S. Patent
No. 7,860,403; U.S. Patent No. 8,971,171; U.S. Patent No. 8,351,798;
and U.S. Patent No. 8,406,637. The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The
Notice of Investigation named numerous respondents, including: Nokia
Corporation of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. of
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy of Espoo,
Finland; Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC of Phoenix, Arizona; and
Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS of Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party in this
investigation.
On March 8, 2018, complainants filed an unopposed motion to (1)
amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the name of
Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS to Alcatel Submarine Networks and
(2) withdraw the complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V.,
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US
LLC. Complainants note that complainants, Nokia Corporation, Nokia
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia
Solutions and Networks US LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks
SAS entered into a joint stipulation concerning the subject matter of
the investigation where Nokia Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks
B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks US
LLC, and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS represented that Nokia
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia
Solutions and Networks US LLC do not sell, design, or manufacture the
accused subsea telecommunication systems and components thereof; and
[[Page 17678]]
that Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC no longer exists as of January
1, 2018. Based on this stipulation, complainants agreed to withdraw the
complaint as to Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, and Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC.
On March 19, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting
complainants' motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists to amend the
complaint and there is no evidence of any prejudice to the parties in
the investigation. The ALJ found that no extraordinary circumstances
prevent the partial termination of the investigation as to Nokia
Solutions and Networks B.V., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, and Nokia
Solutions and Networks US LLC. None of the parties petitioned for
review of the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 17, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-08369 Filed 4-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
