Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 17527-17529 [2018-08289]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
The NSS identifies the need for the
United States to maintain leadership
and freedom of action in space,
including advancing space as a priority
domain, promoting space commerce,
and maintaining the lead in exploration.
In addition to the NSS, Space Policy
Directive—1 (December 11, 2017) calls
for the Nation to lead an innovative and
sustainable program of exploration with
commercial and international partners
to enable human expansion across the
solar system and to bring back to Earth
new knowledge and opportunities.
Robust space weather observing and
forecasting capabilities are key to the
safety and viability of human and
robotic space activities.
NSTC has begun the process to update
the Strategy, and is soliciting public
input through this RFI to obtain
recommendations from a wide range of
stakeholders, including representatives
from diverse industries, academia, and
other relevant organizations and
institutions. The public input provided
in response to this RFI will inform the
NSTC as it works with Federal agencies
and other stakeholders to update the
Strategy.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Questions To Inform Development of
the Strategy
Through this RFI, NSTC seeks
responses to the following questions to
improve government coordination and
provide long-term guidance for Federal
programs and activities in support of
national preparedness for space weather
events, on Earth and in space; and, to
promote American leadership in space
weather research, technology, and
innovation. Responses should clearly
indicate which question is being
addressed.
1. How can the Federal Government
improve internal and external
coordination and better inform the longterm guidance and direction for Federal
programs and activities that support
national preparedness for space weather
events?
2. In priority order, how, where, and
why should the Federal Government
invest limited resources to enhance
research, technology, and innovation to
improve observations and
understanding of space weather events?
Please include near-term and long-term
objectives for each investment.
3. In priority order, what activities
should the Federal Government
undertake to enhance national
capabilities to prepare for, recover from,
adapt to, or otherwise mitigate the
effects of space weather events? Please
include near-term and long-term
objectives for each activity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
4. What innovative tools, platforms, or
technologies are needed by the Federal
Government and space weather research
and development communities to
advance the transition of research to
operations for models and observations
of space weather phenomena? Please
include any barriers to implement the
identified tools, platforms, or
technologies.
5. In priority order, what
opportunities exist to enhance U.S.
operational space weather predictions,
alerts, and services, for Earth, nearEarth, and deep space applications?
Please include any barriers for
implementation and utilization of these
capabilities.
6. Are there regulatory or other
barriers to commercial activities
associated with space weather
prediction, observation, or the
transitioning of research to operations?
Please list any, in priority order, and
describe how the barrier(s) impedes
activity.
7. Beyond regulation and grant
programs, what can the federal
government do to enable and advance
the private sector role for capabilities,
forecasting, modeling, mitigation,
research, development, and observation
in the space weather domain?
8. What opportunities exist for the
United States to marshal the collective
resources of like-minded nations and
organizations to address the global
hazard of space weather?
9. Is there any additional information
related to enhancing national
capabilities to address space weather
events, not requested above, that you
believe NSTC should consider?
Dated: April 17, 2018.
Louis W. Uccellini,
Director, National Weather Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–08336 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
DATES:
17527
Applicable April 20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 6, 2017, Commerce
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from China covering the
period of review (POR) November 1,
2015, through October 31, 2016.1 We
received case and rebuttal briefs with
respect to the Preliminary Results. The
deadline for the final results of this
review is April 16, 2018.2 We conducted
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
and may also enter under subheading
6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. A full description of
the scope of the order is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
The written description is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
BILLING CODE 3510–KE–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) continues to find that
certain companies covered by this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016, 82 FR 57585 (December 6, 2017) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice, at 2, for tolling the due date for the final
results of this administrative review as a result of
the shutdown of the Federal Government from
January 20 through 22, 2018, and a subsequent
extension of the deadline for the final results. See
also Memoranda, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 23, 2018, and ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 9, 2018.
3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–3.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
17528
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as an appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Enforcement and Compliance
website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Danyang
City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang
Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.,
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools
Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Huachang Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Jiangsu InterChina Group Corporation, Orient Gain
International Limited, Qingdao Shinhan
Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Sino
Tools Co., Ltd., which have been
eligible for separate rates in previous
segments of the proceeding and are
subject to this review, did not have any
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.4 After the
Preliminary Results, we received no
comments or additional information
with respect to these nine companies.
Therefore, for the final results, we
continue to find that these nine
companies did not have any reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR. Consistent with our practice,
we will issue appropriate instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) based on our final results.
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determined
that 20 respondents are eligible to
receive separate rates in this review.5
We made no changes to these
determinations for the final results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no revisions to the
Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period November 1, 2015,
through October 31, 2016:
Margin
(percent)
Company
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................................
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd 6 ............................................................................................................................
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity 7 ..................................................................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................................
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................................................................
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................
Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited ..............................................................................................................................................
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd 8 ...................................................................................................................................
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
82.05
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.9 For all
respondents eligible for a separate rate,
we will instruct CBP to apply an
antidumping duty assessment rate of
82.05 percent to all entries of subject
merchandise that entered the United
States during the POR.10 For all other
companies, we will instruct CBP to
apply the antidumping duty assessment
rate of the China-wide entity, 82.05
percent, to all entries of subject
merchandise exported by these
companies.11 For the nine companies
that we determined had no reviewable
entries of the subject merchandise in
this review period, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
China-wide rate.
We intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
review.
4 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 57585, n.2,
and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 3.
5 Id. at 57585, n.6, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 4–8.
6 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,
82 FR 60177 (December 19, 2017). In this changed
circumstances review, Commerce determined that
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co.,
Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Chengdu Huifeng
Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., for which we initiated this
administrative review.
7 Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co.,
Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu
Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., comprise the
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity. See Preliminary
Results, 82 FR at 57585, n.9, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2, n.5.
8 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.,
is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang
Laser Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016).
9 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
10 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comments 3 and 4.
11 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
4294, 4295 (January 13, 2017) (‘‘All firms listed
below that wish to qualify for separate rate status
in the administrative reviews involving NME
countries must complete, as appropriate, either a
separate rate application or certification, as
described below.’’).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from China
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by the companies
listed above that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in these final results of
review for each exporter as listed above;
(2) for previously investigated or
reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese
exporters not listed above that received
a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate;
(3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; (4) for all non-Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that
supplied that non-Chinese exporter.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation subject to sanction.
These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: April 16, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of AFA to
Chengdu Huifeng New Material
Technology Co., Ltd.
Comment 2: Application of AFA to the
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity
Comment 3: Selection of the AFA Rate
Comment 4: Selection of the Separate Rate
for Non-Selected Respondents
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–08289 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–810]
Stainless Steel Bar From India: Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review and Reinstatement of Certain
Companies in the Antidumping Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) has determined that certain
producers/exporters of stainless steel
bar (SS Bar) from India made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value (NV) during the period of review
(POR) July 1, 2015, through June 30,
2016. Accordingly, they are hereby
reinstated in the antidumping order on
SS Bar from India.
DATES: Applicable April 20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 18, 2017, Commerce
published the preliminary results of this
changed circumstances review and
intent to reinstate Venus Wire Industries
Pvt. Ltd. and its affiliates Precision
Metals, Sieves Manufacturers (India)
Pvt. Ltd., and Hindustan Inox Ltd.
(collectively, the Venus Group), and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17529
`
Viraj Profıles Ltd. (Viraj) in the
antidumping duty order on SS Bar from
India.1 This review covers SS Bar from
India produced and/or exported by the
Venus Group and Viraj.
On January 9, 2018, we received case
briefs from the Venus Group and Viraj.2
On January 9, 2018, we received a
rebuttal brief from the petitioners.3 On
March 8, 2018, Commerce held a public
hearing at the request of Viraj.
Commerce conducted this changed
circumstances review in accordance
with section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19
CFR 351.216(d). For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.4 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memo can be
accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is SS bar. SS bar means articles of
stainless steel in straight lengths that
have been either hot-rolled, forged,
turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or
otherwise cold-finished, or ground,
having a uniform solid cross section
along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals,
rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons, or other convex
polygons. SS bar includes cold-finished
1 See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances Review and
Intent To Reinstate Certain Companies in the
Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 48483, October 18,
2017 (CCR Preliminary Results).
2 See Letter from the Venus Group, ‘‘Stainless
Steel Bar from India: Administrative Case Brief of
Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.,’’ dated January 9,
2018, and Letter from Viraj, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar
from India: Case Brief,’’ dated January 9, 2018.
3 See Letters from the petitioners, ‘‘Petitioners’
Rebuttal Brief Regarding Venus,’’ dated January 19,
2018, and ‘‘Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief Regarding
Viraj,’’ dated January 19, 2018. The petitioners are
Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible
Industries LLC, Electralloy, a Division of G.O.
Carlson, Inc., North-American Stainless,
Outokumpu Stainless Bar, LLC, Universal Stainless
& Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna Slater
Stainless, Inc.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review of Stainless Steel Bar from
India,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17527-17529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08289]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-
2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to find that
certain companies covered by this administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal value.
DATES: Applicable April 20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482-3683,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 6, 2017, Commerce published the preliminary results of
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from China covering the period of review (POR) November 1,
2015, through October 31, 2016.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs
with respect to the Preliminary Results. The deadline for the final
results of this review is April 16, 2018.\2\ We conducted this
administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 57585 (December 6, 2017)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See the Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China,''
(Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice, at 2, for tolling the due date for the final
results of this administrative review as a result of the shutdown of
the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018, and a
subsequent extension of the deadline for the final results. See also
Memoranda, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal
Government,'' dated January 23, 2018, and ``Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,'' dated April 9, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The
diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under subheading 6804.21.00.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ The written description is
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this administrative review are addressed in
[[Page 17528]]
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is
attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance
website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.,
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd., Danyang Like Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.,
Jiangsu Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Inter-China
Group Corporation, Orient Gain International Limited, Qingdao Shinhan
Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Sino Tools Co., Ltd., which have been
eligible for separate rates in previous segments of the proceeding and
are subject to this review, did not have any reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ After the Preliminary Results,
we received no comments or additional information with respect to these
nine companies. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find
that these nine companies did not have any reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we
will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) based on our final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 57585, n.2, and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determined that 20 respondents are eligible
to receive separate rates in this review.\5\ We made no changes to
these determinations for the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id. at 57585, n.6, and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 4-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no revisions to the Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period
November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd........................................ 82.05
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd \6\........ 82.05
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd....... 82.05
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd................... 82.05
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd................ 82.05
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.................... 82.05
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.......... 82.05
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd........................ 82.05
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity \7\........................... 82.05
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.................... 82.05
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.................... 82.05
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd..................... 82.05
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.................................... 82.05
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.................. 82.05
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd................. 82.05
Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited.................... 82.05
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd............ 82.05
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd \8\.............. 82.05
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd....................... 82.05
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd......................... 82.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this review.\9\ For all respondents
eligible for a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an
antidumping duty assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all entries of
subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR.\10\
For all other companies, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping
duty assessment rate of the China-wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all
entries of subject merchandise exported by these companies.\11\ For the
nine companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the
subject merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 82 FR 60177 (December 19, 2017). In this
changed circumstances review, Commerce determined that Chengdu
Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-
interest to Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., for which we
initiated this administrative review.
\7\ Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu
Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co.,
Ltd., comprise the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity. See Preliminary
Results, 82 FR at 57585, n.9, and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 2, n.5.
\8\ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the
successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3 and 4.
\11\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 4294, 4295 (January 13, 2017) (``All
firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in
the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as
appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as
described below.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of review.
[[Page 17529]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these
final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters
not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of
this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity; (4) for
all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of
doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject
to sanction.
These final results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 16, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of AFA to Chengdu Huifeng New Material
Technology Co., Ltd.
Comment 2: Application of AFA to the Jiangsu Fengtai Single
Entity
Comment 3: Selection of the AFA Rate
Comment 4: Selection of the Separate Rate for Non-Selected
Respondents
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-08289 Filed 4-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
