Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 16054-16055 [2018-07724]
Download as PDF
16054
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices
1. Purchase of Electricity for More Than
Adequate Remuneration (MTAR)—Sales
via Build-Operate-Own, Build-OperateTransfer, and Transfer of Operating
Rights Contracts
2. Purchase of Electricity Generated From
Renewable Resources for MTAR
3. Provision of Lignite for LTAR
4. Reduction and Exemption of Licensing
Fees for Renewable Resource Power
Plants
5. Research and Development Grant
Program
6. Export Credits, Loans, and Insurance
From Turk Eximbank
7. Regional Investment Incentives
8. Large-Scale Investment Incentives
9. Strategic Investment Incentives
10. Incentives for Research & Development
Activities
11. Regional Development Subsidies
IX. Analysis of Comments
Comment: Whether Commerce Should
Modify the Natural Gas Benchmark
X. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018–07722 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Navneet
Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of
certain lined paper products (CLPP)
from India below normal value during
the period of review (POR) September 1,
2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB
International (SAB) did not.
DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and
Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–3797,
respectively.
AGENCY:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 6, 2017, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results.1 On
1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Apr 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
November 6, 2017, the petitioners,2
Navneet, and SAB timely submitted
their case briefs.3 On November 6, 2017,
the petitioner submitted a request for a
hearing, which it subsequently
withdrew on December 8, 2017.4 On
November 13, 2017, the petitioners and
Navneet timely submitted their
respective rebuttal briefs.5 On January
19, 2018, Commerce postponed the final
results by 60 days, until April 4, 2018.6
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the closure
of the Federal Government from January
20 through 22, 2018. The revised
deadline for the final results of this
review is now April 9, 2018.7
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain lined paper products. The
merchandise subject to this order is
currently classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080,
4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044,
4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090,
4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040,
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
46764 (October 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 The petitioners are the Association of American
School Paper Suppliers and its individual members.
3 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Case Brief of the
Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’
dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter
titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Case Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’ dated
November 6, 2017; see also SAB’s letter titled,
‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB
International Case Brief,’’ dated November 6, 2017.
4 See the petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Request for Hearing,’’
dated November 6, 2017; see also Memorandum to
the File titled, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request for a Meeting
in Lieu of a Hearing,’’ dated December 8, 2017.
5 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the
Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’
dated November 13, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter
titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’
dated November 13, 2017.
6 See Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated January 19, 2018.
7 See Memorandum for The Record from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum),
dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding affected by the closure
of the Federal Government, including the final
results, have been extended by 3 days.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
product description of the scope
remains dispositive.8
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues that parties raised
and to which we responded is attached
to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on-file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit (CRU), room
B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at http://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we made the following
company-specific change to Navneet’s
final margin calculation: (1) We did not
make a duty drawback adjustment for
duties paid on imported input materials
used to produce the subject
merchandise; (2) we made certain
revisions to Navneet’s home market
(HM) price to account for excise taxes
and local body taxes; and (3) we made
changes to Navneet’s HM program by
converting the variable PRIMEH to ‘1’ to
match the format used for the variable
PRIMEU. As a result of these changes,
we determine that Navneet made sales
of subject merchandise below normal
value during the POR and have
calculated a final weighted-average
dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We
made no change to SAB’s preliminary
SAS margin program and, therefore,
SAB’s preliminary margin remains
unchanged for these final results.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, Commerce
calculated the following dumping
8 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined
Paper Products from India: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash
deposit rate for respondents noted above
will be the rate established in the final
Weightedresults of this administrative review; (2)
average
for merchandise exported by
Producer/exporter
dumping
manufacturers or exporters not covered
margin
in this administrative review but
(percent)
covered in a prior segment of the
Navneet Education Ltd .........
1.34 proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
SAB International ..................
0.00 continue to be the company specific rate
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Prodpublished for the most recently
ucts Pvt. Ltd ......................
1.34
completed segment of this proceeding;
Magic International Pvt. Ltd ..
1.34
Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd ...
1.34 (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
SGM Paper Products ...........
1.34 in this review, a prior review, or the
Super Impex .........................
1.34 original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
Duty Assessment
recently completed segment of this
Commerce shall determine and
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
shall assess antidumping duties on all
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
10 Specifically, for
appropriate entries.
or exporters will continue to be 3.91
Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP
percent, the all-others rate established
to liquidate their entries during the POR
in the original antidumping duty
imported by the importers (or
investigation.13 These cash deposit
customers) identified in their
requirements, when imposed, shall
questionnaire responses without regard
remain in effect until further notice.
to antidumping duties because their
weighted-average dumping margins in
Notification to Importers Regarding the
these final results is zero.11 In
Reimbursement of Duties
accordance with Commerce’s practice,
This notice also serves as a final
for entries of subject merchandise
reminder to importers of their
during the POR for which Navneet or
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
SAB did not know that the merchandise to file a certificate regarding the
was destined for the United States, we
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
countervailing duties prior to
entries at the all-others rate if there is no liquidation of the relevant entries
company-specific rate for the
during the POR. Failure to comply with
intermediate company(ies) involved in
this requirement could result in
the transaction.12 We intend to issue
Commerce’s presumption that
assessment instructions directly to CBP
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
15 days after publication of the final
countervailing duties occurred and the
results of this review.
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Administrative Protective Order
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
This notice also serves as a reminder
publication of the notice of final results
to parties subject to administrative
of administrative review for all
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
9 See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United
destruction of proprietary information
States, 821 F.3d 1345, 1351–53 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
disclosed under APO in accordance
(Albemarle).
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
10 In these final results, Commerce applied the
continues to govern business
assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
proprietary information in this segment
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
margins for Navneet and SAB. We are
applying to the non-selected companies
the rates calculated for the mandatory
respondents in these final results,
excluding any zero and de minimis
margins, as referenced below.9
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
11 Id., 77 FR at 8102.
12 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Apr 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
13 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the
People’s Republic of China; and Notice of
Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949
(September 28, 2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16055
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Analysis of Comments
Comments Concerning Navneet
1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify
Navneet’s Reported Levels of Trade
2. Whether Commerce Should Grant
Navneet’s Claimed Duty Drawback
Adjustment
3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an
Adjustment for Defective Product Claims
Reported in the Other Rebates Field
4. Treatment of Navneet’s Excise Expense
and Local Body Tax in Home Market
Price and Cost Calculation
5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the
Miscoded PRIMEU Field
Comment Concerning SAB
6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May
Be the Importer of Record Should Be
Included in the Liquidation Instructions
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–07724 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–913]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 6, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain
new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16054-16055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07724]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet
Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products
(CLPP) from India below normal value during the period of review (POR)
September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International (SAB)
did not.
DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and
Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482-7851 or (202) 482-3797, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\
On November 6, 2017, the petitioners,\2\ Navneet, and SAB timely
submitted their case briefs.\3\ On November 6, 2017, the petitioner
submitted a request for a hearing, which it subsequently withdrew on
December 8, 2017.\4\ On November 13, 2017, the petitioners and Navneet
timely submitted their respective rebuttal briefs.\5\ On January 19,
2018, Commerce postponed the final results by 60 days, until April 4,
2018.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 46764 (October 6,
2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ The petitioners are the Association of American School Paper
Suppliers and its individual members.
\3\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Case Brief of the Association of American
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet's
letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Case Brief
of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also
SAB's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB
International Case Brief,'' dated November 6, 2017.
\4\ See the petitioner's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Request for Hearing,'' dated November 6, 2017;
see also Memorandum to the File titled, ``Petitioner's Request for a
Meeting in Lieu of a Hearing,'' dated December 8, 2017.
\5\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper
Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the Association of American
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 13, 2017; see also
Navneet's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 13,
2017.
\6\ See Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from
India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated January 19, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018.
The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now April
9, 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23,
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by
the closure of the Federal Government, including the final results,
have been extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper
products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040,
4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020,
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description of the scope
remains dispositive.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see
Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we
responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made the
following company-specific change to Navneet's final margin
calculation: (1) We did not make a duty drawback adjustment for duties
paid on imported input materials used to produce the subject
merchandise; (2) we made certain revisions to Navneet's home market
(HM) price to account for excise taxes and local body taxes; and (3) we
made changes to Navneet's HM program by converting the variable PRIMEH
to `1' to match the format used for the variable PRIMEU. As a result of
these changes, we determine that Navneet made sales of subject
merchandise below normal value during the POR and have calculated a
final weighted-average dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We made no
change to SAB's preliminary SAS margin program and, therefore, SAB's
preliminary margin remains unchanged for these final results.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, Commerce calculated the following
dumping
[[Page 16055]]
margins for Navneet and SAB. We are applying to the non-selected
companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in these
final results, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, as referenced
below.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821
F.3d 1345, 1351-53 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navneet Education Ltd................................... 1.34
SAB International....................................... 0.00
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd................... 1.34
Magic International Pvt. Ltd............................ 1.34
Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd.............................. 1.34
SGM Paper Products...................................... 1.34
Super Impex............................................. 1.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty Assessment
Commerce shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\10\
Specifically, for Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
their entries during the POR imported by the importers (or customers)
identified in their questionnaire responses without regard to
antidumping duties because their weighted-average dumping margins in
these final results is zero.\11\ In accordance with Commerce's
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which
Navneet or SAB did not know that the merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the
all-others rate if there is no company-specific rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\ We intend to
issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication
of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment
rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR
8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
\11\ Id., 77 FR at 8102.
\12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash
deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established
in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-
others rate established in the original antidumping duty
investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Analysis of Comments
Comments Concerning Navneet
1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify Navneet's Reported Levels
of Trade
2. Whether Commerce Should Grant Navneet's Claimed Duty Drawback
Adjustment
3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an Adjustment for Defective
Product Claims Reported in the Other Rebates Field
4. Treatment of Navneet's Excise Expense and Local Body Tax in
Home Market Price and Cost Calculation
5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the Miscoded PRIMEU Field
Comment Concerning SAB
6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May Be the Importer of
Record Should Be Included in the Liquidation Instructions
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-07724 Filed 4-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P