Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 16054-16055 [2018-07724]

Download as PDF 16054 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices 1. Purchase of Electricity for More Than Adequate Remuneration (MTAR)—Sales via Build-Operate-Own, Build-OperateTransfer, and Transfer of Operating Rights Contracts 2. Purchase of Electricity Generated From Renewable Resources for MTAR 3. Provision of Lignite for LTAR 4. Reduction and Exemption of Licensing Fees for Renewable Resource Power Plants 5. Research and Development Grant Program 6. Export Credits, Loans, and Insurance From Turk Eximbank 7. Regional Investment Incentives 8. Large-Scale Investment Incentives 9. Strategic Investment Incentives 10. Incentives for Research & Development Activities 11. Regional Development Subsidies IX. Analysis of Comments Comment: Whether Commerce Should Modify the Natural Gas Benchmark X. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2018–07722 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products (CLPP) from India below normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International (SAB) did not. DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–3797, respectively. AGENCY: daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Apr 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 November 6, 2017, the petitioners,2 Navneet, and SAB timely submitted their case briefs.3 On November 6, 2017, the petitioner submitted a request for a hearing, which it subsequently withdrew on December 8, 2017.4 On November 13, 2017, the petitioners and Navneet timely submitted their respective rebuttal briefs.5 On January 19, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results by 60 days, until April 4, 2018.6 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now April 9, 2018.7 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 46764 (October 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 The petitioners are the Association of American School Paper Suppliers and its individual members. 3 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Case Brief of the Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’ dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Case Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’ dated November 6, 2017; see also SAB’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB International Case Brief,’’ dated November 6, 2017. 4 See the petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Request for Hearing,’’ dated November 6, 2017; see also Memorandum to the File titled, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request for a Meeting in Lieu of a Hearing,’’ dated December 8, 2017. 5 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’ dated November 13, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’ dated November 13, 2017. 6 See Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated January 19, 2018. 7 See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by the closure of the Federal Government, including the final results, have been extended by 3 days. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 product description of the scope remains dispositive.8 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made the following company-specific change to Navneet’s final margin calculation: (1) We did not make a duty drawback adjustment for duties paid on imported input materials used to produce the subject merchandise; (2) we made certain revisions to Navneet’s home market (HM) price to account for excise taxes and local body taxes; and (3) we made changes to Navneet’s HM program by converting the variable PRIMEH to ‘1’ to match the format used for the variable PRIMEU. As a result of these changes, we determine that Navneet made sales of subject merchandise below normal value during the POR and have calculated a final weighted-average dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We made no change to SAB’s preliminary SAS margin program and, therefore, SAB’s preliminary margin remains unchanged for these final results. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, Commerce calculated the following dumping 8 For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final Weightedresults of this administrative review; (2) average for merchandise exported by Producer/exporter dumping manufacturers or exporters not covered margin in this administrative review but (percent) covered in a prior segment of the Navneet Education Ltd ......... 1.34 proceeding, the cash deposit rate will SAB International .................. 0.00 continue to be the company specific rate Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Prodpublished for the most recently ucts Pvt. Ltd ...................... 1.34 completed segment of this proceeding; Magic International Pvt. Ltd .. 1.34 Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd ... 1.34 (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered SGM Paper Products ........... 1.34 in this review, a prior review, or the Super Impex ......................... 1.34 original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most Duty Assessment recently completed segment of this Commerce shall determine and proceeding for the manufacturer of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) subject merchandise; and (4) the cash shall assess antidumping duties on all deposit rate for all other manufacturers 10 Specifically, for appropriate entries. or exporters will continue to be 3.91 Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP percent, the all-others rate established to liquidate their entries during the POR in the original antidumping duty imported by the importers (or investigation.13 These cash deposit customers) identified in their requirements, when imposed, shall questionnaire responses without regard remain in effect until further notice. to antidumping duties because their weighted-average dumping margins in Notification to Importers Regarding the these final results is zero.11 In Reimbursement of Duties accordance with Commerce’s practice, This notice also serves as a final for entries of subject merchandise reminder to importers of their during the POR for which Navneet or responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) SAB did not know that the merchandise to file a certificate regarding the was destined for the United States, we reimbursement of antidumping and/or will instruct CBP to liquidate such countervailing duties prior to entries at the all-others rate if there is no liquidation of the relevant entries company-specific rate for the during the POR. Failure to comply with intermediate company(ies) involved in this requirement could result in the transaction.12 We intend to issue Commerce’s presumption that assessment instructions directly to CBP reimbursement of antidumping and/or 15 days after publication of the final countervailing duties occurred and the results of this review. subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements Administrative Protective Order The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon This notice also serves as a reminder publication of the notice of final results to parties subject to administrative of administrative review for all protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or 9 See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United destruction of proprietary information States, 821 F.3d 1345, 1351–53 (Fed. Cir. 2016) disclosed under APO in accordance (Albemarle). with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 10 In these final results, Commerce applied the continues to govern business assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the proprietary information in this segment daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES margins for Navneet and SAB. We are applying to the non-selected companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in these final results, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, as referenced below.9 Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). 11 Id., 77 FR at 8102. 12 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Apr 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 13 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16055 of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: April 9, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Comments III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Analysis of Comments Comments Concerning Navneet 1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify Navneet’s Reported Levels of Trade 2. Whether Commerce Should Grant Navneet’s Claimed Duty Drawback Adjustment 3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an Adjustment for Defective Product Claims Reported in the Other Rebates Field 4. Treatment of Navneet’s Excise Expense and Local Body Tax in Home Market Price and Cost Calculation 5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the Miscoded PRIMEU Field Comment Concerning SAB 6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May Be the Importer of Record Should Be Included in the Liquidation Instructions VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–07724 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–913] Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16054-16055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet 
Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products 
(CLPP) from India below normal value during the period of review (POR) 
September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International (SAB) 
did not.

DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and 
Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone 
(202) 482-7851 or (202) 482-3797, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ 
On November 6, 2017, the petitioners,\2\ Navneet, and SAB timely 
submitted their case briefs.\3\ On November 6, 2017, the petitioner 
submitted a request for a hearing, which it subsequently withdrew on 
December 8, 2017.\4\ On November 13, 2017, the petitioners and Navneet 
timely submitted their respective rebuttal briefs.\5\ On January 19, 
2018, Commerce postponed the final results by 60 days, until April 4, 
2018.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 46764 (October 6, 
2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ The petitioners are the Association of American School Paper 
Suppliers and its individual members.
    \3\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Case Brief of the Association of American 
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet's 
letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Case Brief 
of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also 
SAB's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB 
International Case Brief,'' dated November 6, 2017.
    \4\ See the petitioner's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Request for Hearing,'' dated November 6, 2017; 
see also Memorandum to the File titled, ``Petitioner's Request for a 
Meeting in Lieu of a Hearing,'' dated December 8, 2017.
    \5\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the Association of American 
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 13, 2017; see also 
Navneet's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 
Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 13, 
2017.
    \6\ See Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from 
India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated January 19, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by 
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. 
The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now April 
9, 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of 
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by 
the closure of the Federal Government, including the final results, 
have been extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper 
products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified 
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 
4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written product description of the scope 
remains dispositive.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see 
Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Issues 
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and 
hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we 
responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made the 
following company-specific change to Navneet's final margin 
calculation: (1) We did not make a duty drawback adjustment for duties 
paid on imported input materials used to produce the subject 
merchandise; (2) we made certain revisions to Navneet's home market 
(HM) price to account for excise taxes and local body taxes; and (3) we 
made changes to Navneet's HM program by converting the variable PRIMEH 
to `1' to match the format used for the variable PRIMEU. As a result of 
these changes, we determine that Navneet made sales of subject 
merchandise below normal value during the POR and have calculated a 
final weighted-average dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We made no 
change to SAB's preliminary SAS margin program and, therefore, SAB's 
preliminary margin remains unchanged for these final results.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce calculated the following 
dumping

[[Page 16055]]

margins for Navneet and SAB. We are applying to the non-selected 
companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in these 
final results, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, as referenced 
below.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 
F.3d 1345, 1351-53 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Producer/exporter                     dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navneet Education Ltd...................................            1.34
SAB International.......................................            0.00
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd...................            1.34
Magic International Pvt. Ltd............................            1.34
Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd..............................            1.34
SGM Paper Products......................................            1.34
Super Impex.............................................            1.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Assessment

    Commerce shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\10\ 
Specifically, for Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
their entries during the POR imported by the importers (or customers) 
identified in their questionnaire responses without regard to 
antidumping duties because their weighted-average dumping margins in 
these final results is zero.\11\ In accordance with Commerce's 
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which 
Navneet or SAB did not know that the merchandise was destined for the 
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no company-specific rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\ We intend to 
issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication 
of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment 
rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: 
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment 
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 
8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
    \11\ Id., 77 FR at 8102.
    \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 
deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established 
in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior 
review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-
others rate established in the original antidumping duty 
investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Analysis of Comments
    Comments Concerning Navneet
    1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify Navneet's Reported Levels 
of Trade
    2. Whether Commerce Should Grant Navneet's Claimed Duty Drawback 
Adjustment
    3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an Adjustment for Defective 
Product Claims Reported in the Other Rebates Field
    4. Treatment of Navneet's Excise Expense and Local Body Tax in 
Home Market Price and Cost Calculation
    5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the Miscoded PRIMEU Field
    Comment Concerning SAB
    6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May Be the Importer of 
Record Should Be Included in the Liquidation Instructions
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-07724 Filed 4-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P