Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Expand an Offering Known as Cboe Connect To Provide Connectivity to Single-Dealer Platforms Connected to the Exchange's Network and To Propose a Per Share Executed Fee for Such Service, 12995-12997 [2018-06011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Notices
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
that the proposed rule change (SR–
CboeBZX–2017–012), as modified by
Amendment No. 2, be, and hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.29
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–06013 Filed 3–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82904; File No. SR–
CboeEDGA–2018–004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Expand an
Offering Known as Cboe Connect To
Provide Connectivity to Single-Dealer
Platforms Connected to the
Exchange’s Network and To Propose a
Per Share Executed Fee for Such
Service
March 20, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 14,
2018, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder,4 which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
expand an offering known as Cboe
Connect to provide connectivity to
single-dealer platforms connected to the
Exchange’s network and to propose a
per share executed fee for such service.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s website at
www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal
29 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Mar 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Cboe Connect is an optional
communication service that provides
Members 5 an additional means to
receive market data from and route
orders to any destination connected to
the Exchange’s network.6 Cboe Connect
is offered by the Exchange on a
voluntary basis in a capacity similar to
a vendor. The servers of the participant
need not be located in the same
facilities as the Exchange in order to
subscribe to Cboe Connect. Participants
may also seek to utilize Cboe Connect in
the event of a market disruption where
other alternative connection methods
become unavailable.
Today, market participants are able to
send orders directly to broker-dealers
that operate single-dealer platforms,
where broker-dealers would execute
orders received on a principal basis or
return the unexecuted order (or portion
thereof) back to their customers. To
connect to a single-dealer platform, the
broker-dealer’s customer must purchase
connectivity and perform the necessary
infrastructure work to be able to send
orders to that single-dealer platform.
Cboe Connect allows participants to
send orders to other exchanges and
market centers that are connected to the
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer, or any person associated
with a registered broker or dealer, that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange. A
Member will have the status of a ‘‘member’’ of the
Exchange as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3)
of the Act.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
6 See Exchange Rule 13.9. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 75112 (June 5, 2015), 80
FR 33316 (June 11, 2015) (SR–EDGA–2015–20)
(proposal adopting Cboe Connect (f/k/a Bats
Connect); and 34753 (June 11, 2015), 80 FR 34753
(June 17, 2015) (SR–EDGA–2015–24) (proposal
adopting fees for Cboe Connect).
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12995
Exchange’s network. Market centers on
the Exchange’s network include
Alternative Trading Systems operated
by broker-dealers, but do not currently
include single-dealer platforms. The
Exchange proposes to expand Cboe
Connect to now provide optional
connectivity by which market
participant may send orders to these
single-dealer trading platforms
connected to the Exchange’s network.
The exchange proposes to refer to this
connectivity option under Cboe Connect
as C–LNK.
Orders routed via Cboe Connect to a
single-dealer platform would be treated
the same as orders routed today via
Cboe Connect to an exchange or market
center connected to the Exchange’s
network. Cboe Connect does not effect
trade executions and would not report
trades to the relevant Securities
Information Processor and the Exchange
does not propose to do so for orders sent
to single-dealer platforms. An order sent
via the service to a single-dealer
platform would be handled by the
Exchange’s affiliated broker-dealer,
Cboe Trading, Inc., and bypass the
EDGA Book before going to a market
center outside of the Exchange (i.e., a
participant could choose to route an
order directly to any single-dealer
platform on the Exchange’s network). A
participant would be responsible for
identifying the single-dealer platform
for any orders sent through the service
and for ensuring that it had authority to
access the selected destination; the
Exchange would merely provide the
connectivity by which orders (and
associated messages) could be sent by a
participant to the single-dealer platform
and from the destination back to the
participant.
The Exchange notes that Users
sending orders to single-dealer
platforms via the C–LNK connectivity
service would be subject to any
transaction related rates applied by the
single-dealer platform executing their
order.7 This is not unique to C–LNK or
Cboe Connect as market participants
who chose another method to connect to
a single-dealer platform would also be
required to pay any transaction related
fees directly to that single-dealer
platform. In addition, market
participants who send orders through
Cboe Connect are subject to separate per
transaction rates (fees/rebates) provided
directly by the other exchanges and
7 Like alternative trading systems, single-dealer
platforms are operated by broker-dealers and any
transaction related rates are presumed to be
similarly pre-negotiated between the broker-dealer
and their customer.
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
12996
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
market centers to which they send their
orders for execution.
Today, the Exchange charges a
monthly connectivity fee to subscribers
utilizing Cboe Connect to route orders to
other exchanges and broker-dealers that
are connected to the Exchange’s
network. The amount of the
connectivity fee varies based on the
bandwidth selected by the subscriber.8
Rather than charging a set connectivity
fee based on bandwidth, the Exchange
proposes to charge a fee of $0.0002 for
each share executed by a single dealer
platform for orders routed via Cboe
Connect. The Exchange proposes a per
share rate, as opposed to a monthly
bandwidth related charge, because C–
LNK is a new service and the Exchange
believes a monthly bandwidth charge
may prove a deterrent to attracting usage
based on the anticipated preliminary
volumes. The Exchange, therefore,
believes it is appropriate to charge a per
share fee at this time so that Users may
evaluate the efficacy of C–LNK and the
connectivity it provides.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 9 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 10
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
C–LNK removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system because it provides users with
optional connectivity method by which
market participant may send orders to
these single-dealer trading platforms.
The proposed connectivity would be
provided on a voluntary basis and no
rule or regulation requires that the
Exchange offer it. Nor does any rule or
regulation require market participants to
send orders to single-dealer platforms
generally, let alone through a
connection like that proposed herein.
The proposed connectivity to singledealer platforms would operate in the
same manner as connectively provided
8 Specifically,
the Exchange charges $500 for 1
Mb, $1,000 for 5 Mb, $1,250 for 10 Mb, $1,500 for
25 Mb, $2,500 for 50 Mb, and $3,500 for 100 Mb.
See the Exchange’s fee schedule available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_
schedule/edga/.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Mar 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
today to other exchanges and market
centers via Cboe Connect.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee is consistent Section
6(b)(4) 11 of the Act because it would
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its Members and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange
proposes to charge a per share fee for
each order sent via C–LNK to a singledealer platform that is connected to the
Exchange’s network. The proposed a per
share fee is appropriate, as opposed to
a monthly bandwidth related charge,
because C–LNK is a new service and the
Exchange believes a monthly bandwidth
charge may prove a deterrent to
attracting usage based on the anticipated
preliminary volumes. A per share fee is
intended to encourage use of C–LNK at
a rate that would enable users to
evaluate its efficacy and the
connectivity it provides. Furthermore,
the proposed fee is designed to cover
the Exchange’s costs related to
providing the connectivity and
performing the necessary infrastructure
work to be able send orders to each
single-dealer platform connected to the
Exchange’s network. The Exchange
notes that, like all connectivity provide
via Cboe Connect, C–LNK would be an
optional service provided on a
voluntary basis. Therefore, users may
decide to not send orders via C–LNK
due to the reasonableness of the fee
charged.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is a service that is
designed to provide market participants
with an alternative connectivity to
additional pools of liquidity and is not
intended have a competitive impact.
Therefore, the Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change will
have any effect on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
11 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGA–2018–004 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGA–2018–004. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
13 17
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Notices
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGA–2018–004 and
should be submitted on or before April
16, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–06011 Filed 3–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–82913; File No. SR–FICC–
2017–021]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Instituting Proceedings To Determine
Whether To Approve or Disapprove a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a
Recovery & Wind-Down Plan and
Related Rules
March 20, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On December 18, 2017, Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Mar 23, 2018
II. Summary of the Proposed Rule
Change
As described in the Notice,8 FICC
proposes to (i) adopt a Recovery &
Wind-down Plan (‘‘R&W Plan’’), (ii)
adopt rules to facilitate the
implementation of the R&W Plan, and
(iii) make conforming changes to
existing rules. Specifically, to facilitate
the implementation of the R&W Plan,
FICC proposes to adopt a proposed
wind-down rule and a proposed market
disruption and force majeure rule to
both FICC’s Government Securities
Division (‘‘GSD’’) Rulebook (‘‘GSD
Rules’’) 9 and FICC’s Mortgage-Backed
Securities Division (‘‘MBSD’’) Clearing
Rules (‘‘MBSD Rules’’) 10 (collectively,
2 17
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1 15
19b–4 thereunder,2 proposed rule
change SR–FICC–2017–021 to adopt a
recovery and wind-down plan and
related rules (‘‘Proposed Rule
Change’’).3 The Proposed Rule Change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on January 8, 2018.4
The Commission did not receive any
comments on the Proposed Rule
Change. On February 8, 2018, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act,5
the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve,
disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the Proposed Rule Change.6
This order institutes proceedings,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Act,7 to determine whether to approve
or disapprove the Proposed Rule
Change.
Jkt 244001
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 On December 18, 2017, FICC filed this proposal
as an advance notice (SR–FICC–2017–805) with the
Commission pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of the
Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act
of 2010 (‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) and Rule 19b–
4(n)(1)(i) of the Act (‘‘Advance Notice’’). On January
24, 2018, the Commission extended the review
period of the Advance Notice for an additional 60
days pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(H) of the
Clearing Supervision Act. See 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1);
17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i); 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1)(H);
and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82580
(January 24, 2018), 83 FR 4341 (January 30, 2018)
(SR–FICC–2017–805).
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82431
(January 2, 2018), 83 FR 871 (January 8, 2018) (SR–
FICC–2017–021) (‘‘Notice’’).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82669
(February 8, 2018), 83 FR 6653 (February 14, 2018)
(SR–DTC–2017–021; SR–FICC–2017–021; SR–
NSCC–2017–017).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
8 The description of the Proposed Rule Change is
based on the statements prepared by FICC in the
Notice. See Notice, supra note 4.
9 FICC proposes to adopt GSD Rule 22D (Winddown of the Corporation) and GSD Rule 50 (Market
Disruption and Force Majeure). See Notice, supra
note 4, at 872.
10 FICC proposes to adopt MBSD Rule 17B (Winddown of the Corporation) and MBSD Rule 40
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12997
‘‘Wind-down Rule’’ and ‘‘Force Majeure
Rule,’’ respectively). FICC proposes to
make conforming changes to existing
rules to incorporate the proposed Winddown Rule and proposed Force Majeure
Rule.11
FICC states that the R&W Plan is
intended to be used by FICC’s Board of
Directors and management in the event
that FICC encounters scenarios that
could potentially prevent it from being
able to provide its critical services as a
going concern.12 The R&W Plan would
be structured to provide a roadmap,
define the strategy, and identify the
tools available to FICC to either (i)
recover in the event it experiences
losses that exceed its prefunded
resources or (ii) wind-down its business
in a manner designed to permit the
continuation of its critical services in
the event that such recovery efforts are
not successful.13 The R&W Plan would
include tools that are provided for in
FICC’s existing rules, policies,
procedures, and contractual
arrangements,14 as well as the proposed
Wind-down Rule and the proposed
Force Majeure Rule.15
FICC states that the proposed Winddown Rule and the proposed Force
Majeure Rule are designed to (i)
facilitate the implementation of the
R&W Plan when necessary; (ii) provide
Members and Limited Members with
transparency around critical provisions
of the R&W Plan that relate to their
rights, responsibilities, and
obligations; 16 and (iii) provide FICC
(Market Disruption and Force Majeure). See Notice,
supra note 4, at 872.
11 FICC proposes to make conforming changes to
GSD Rules, MBSD Rules, and MBSD Electronic Pool
Netting (‘‘EPN’’) Rules (‘‘EPN Rules’’). Specifically,
FICC proposes to amend the following GSD Rules
and MBSD Rules to incorporate the proposed Winddown Rule and proposed Force Majeure Rule, as
applicable: GSD Rule 3A (Sponsoring Members and
Sponsored Members), GSD Rule 3B (Centrally
Cleared Institutional Triparty Service), GSD Rule 13
(Funds-Only Settlement), and MBSD Rule 3A (Cash
Settlement Bank Members). See Notice, supra note
4, at 872, 881–82. Additionally, FICC proposes to
amend EPN Rule 1 to provide that EPN Users are
bound by proposed MBSD Rule 17B (Wind-down of
the Corporation) and proposed MBSD Rule 40
(Market Disruption and Force Majeure). Id.
Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in
the GSD Rules, MBSD Rules, and EPN Rules, as
applicable, available at https://www.dtcc.com/legal/
rules-and-procedures.
12 See Notice, supra note 4, at 872.
13 Id. at 873.
14 Contractual arrangements include, for example,
FICC’s existing committed or pre-arranged liquidity
arrangements.
15 See Notice, supra note 4, at 872.
16 Consistent with the Notice, references to
‘‘Members’’ refer to GSD Netting Members and
MBSD Clearing Members. References to ‘‘Limited
Members’’ refer to participants of GSD or MBSD
other than GSD Netting Members and MBSD
Clearing Members, including, for example, GSD
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
Continued
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12995-12997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82904; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2018-004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Expand an Offering Known as Cboe Connect To Provide Connectivity to
Single-Dealer Platforms Connected to the Exchange's Network and To
Propose a Per Share Executed Fee for Such Service
March 20, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 14, 2018, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to expand an offering known as Cboe
Connect to provide connectivity to single-dealer platforms connected to
the Exchange's network and to propose a per share executed fee for such
service.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Cboe Connect is an optional communication service that provides
Members \5\ an additional means to receive market data from and route
orders to any destination connected to the Exchange's network.\6\ Cboe
Connect is offered by the Exchange on a voluntary basis in a capacity
similar to a vendor. The servers of the participant need not be located
in the same facilities as the Exchange in order to subscribe to Cboe
Connect. Participants may also seek to utilize Cboe Connect in the
event of a market disruption where other alternative connection methods
become unavailable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or
dealer, or any person associated with a registered broker or dealer,
that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange. A Member will
have the status of a ``member'' of the Exchange as that term is
defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.'' See Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
\6\ See Exchange Rule 13.9. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 75112 (June 5, 2015), 80 FR 33316 (June 11, 2015) (SR-
EDGA-2015-20) (proposal adopting Cboe Connect (f/k/a Bats Connect);
and 34753 (June 11, 2015), 80 FR 34753 (June 17, 2015) (SR-EDGA-
2015-24) (proposal adopting fees for Cboe Connect).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, market participants are able to send orders directly to
broker-dealers that operate single-dealer platforms, where broker-
dealers would execute orders received on a principal basis or return
the unexecuted order (or portion thereof) back to their customers. To
connect to a single-dealer platform, the broker-dealer's customer must
purchase connectivity and perform the necessary infrastructure work to
be able to send orders to that single-dealer platform. Cboe Connect
allows participants to send orders to other exchanges and market
centers that are connected to the Exchange's network. Market centers on
the Exchange's network include Alternative Trading Systems operated by
broker-dealers, but do not currently include single-dealer platforms.
The Exchange proposes to expand Cboe Connect to now provide optional
connectivity by which market participant may send orders to these
single-dealer trading platforms connected to the Exchange's network.
The exchange proposes to refer to this connectivity option under Cboe
Connect as C-LNK.
Orders routed via Cboe Connect to a single-dealer platform would be
treated the same as orders routed today via Cboe Connect to an exchange
or market center connected to the Exchange's network. Cboe Connect does
not effect trade executions and would not report trades to the relevant
Securities Information Processor and the Exchange does not propose to
do so for orders sent to single-dealer platforms. An order sent via the
service to a single-dealer platform would be handled by the Exchange's
affiliated broker-dealer, Cboe Trading, Inc., and bypass the EDGA Book
before going to a market center outside of the Exchange (i.e., a
participant could choose to route an order directly to any single-
dealer platform on the Exchange's network). A participant would be
responsible for identifying the single-dealer platform for any orders
sent through the service and for ensuring that it had authority to
access the selected destination; the Exchange would merely provide the
connectivity by which orders (and associated messages) could be sent by
a participant to the single-dealer platform and from the destination
back to the participant.
The Exchange notes that Users sending orders to single-dealer
platforms via the C-LNK connectivity service would be subject to any
transaction related rates applied by the single-dealer platform
executing their order.\7\ This is not unique to C-LNK or Cboe Connect
as market participants who chose another method to connect to a single-
dealer platform would also be required to pay any transaction related
fees directly to that single-dealer platform. In addition, market
participants who send orders through Cboe Connect are subject to
separate per transaction rates (fees/rebates) provided directly by the
other exchanges and
[[Page 12996]]
market centers to which they send their orders for execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Like alternative trading systems, single-dealer platforms
are operated by broker-dealers and any transaction related rates are
presumed to be similarly pre-negotiated between the broker-dealer
and their customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange charges a monthly connectivity fee to
subscribers utilizing Cboe Connect to route orders to other exchanges
and broker-dealers that are connected to the Exchange's network. The
amount of the connectivity fee varies based on the bandwidth selected
by the subscriber.\8\ Rather than charging a set connectivity fee based
on bandwidth, the Exchange proposes to charge a fee of $0.0002 for each
share executed by a single dealer platform for orders routed via Cboe
Connect. The Exchange proposes a per share rate, as opposed to a
monthly bandwidth related charge, because C-LNK is a new service and
the Exchange believes a monthly bandwidth charge may prove a deterrent
to attracting usage based on the anticipated preliminary volumes. The
Exchange, therefore, believes it is appropriate to charge a per share
fee at this time so that Users may evaluate the efficacy of C-LNK and
the connectivity it provides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Specifically, the Exchange charges $500 for 1 Mb, $1,000 for
5 Mb, $1,250 for 10 Mb, $1,500 for 25 Mb, $2,500 for 50 Mb, and
$3,500 for 100 Mb. See the Exchange's fee schedule available at
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-LNK removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system because it provides users
with optional connectivity method by which market participant may send
orders to these single-dealer trading platforms. The proposed
connectivity would be provided on a voluntary basis and no rule or
regulation requires that the Exchange offer it. Nor does any rule or
regulation require market participants to send orders to single-dealer
platforms generally, let alone through a connection like that proposed
herein. The proposed connectivity to single-dealer platforms would
operate in the same manner as connectively provided today to other
exchanges and market centers via Cboe Connect.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fee is consistent Section
6(b)(4) \11\ of the Act because it would provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members
and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange proposes to charge
a per share fee for each order sent via C-LNK to a single-dealer
platform that is connected to the Exchange's network. The proposed a
per share fee is appropriate, as opposed to a monthly bandwidth related
charge, because C-LNK is a new service and the Exchange believes a
monthly bandwidth charge may prove a deterrent to attracting usage
based on the anticipated preliminary volumes. A per share fee is
intended to encourage use of C-LNK at a rate that would enable users to
evaluate its efficacy and the connectivity it provides. Furthermore,
the proposed fee is designed to cover the Exchange's costs related to
providing the connectivity and performing the necessary infrastructure
work to be able send orders to each single-dealer platform connected to
the Exchange's network. The Exchange notes that, like all connectivity
provide via Cboe Connect, C-LNK would be an optional service provided
on a voluntary basis. Therefore, users may decide to not send orders
via C-LNK due to the reasonableness of the fee charged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change is a service that is designed to provide market
participants with an alternative connectivity to additional pools of
liquidity and is not intended have a competitive impact. Therefore, the
Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will have any effect
on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGA-2018-004 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGA-2018-004. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will
[[Page 12997]]
post all comments on the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
CboeEDGA-2018-004 and should be submitted on or before April 16, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06011 Filed 3-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P