Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From China, 12406 [2018-05695]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
12406
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2018 / Notices
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted Investigation No.
337–TA–990 on March 18, 2016, based
on a complaint filed by Immersion
Corporation of San Jose, California
(‘‘Immersion’’). 81 FR 14889 (Mar. 18,
2016). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain mobile electronic devices
incorporating haptics (including
smartphones and smartwatches) and
components thereof, by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos.: 8,773,356; 8,619,051; and
8,659,571. The notice of investigation
named as respondents Apple Inc. of
Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’); AT&T
Inc. of Dallas, Texas (‘‘AT&T Inc’’); and
AT&T Mobility LLC of Atlanta, Georgia
(‘‘AT&T Mobility’’). The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations was also named as
a party. On May 4, 2016, the
Commission issued a notice
determining not to review the ALJ’s ID
terminating the investigation as to
respondent AT&T Inc. based upon
withdrawal of the complaint.
The Commission instituted
Investigation No. 337–TA–1004 on June
9, 2016, based upon another complaint
filed by Immersion, alleging a violation
of section 337 by Apple and AT&T
Mobility by reason of the infringement
of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.:
8,749,507; 7,808,488; 7,336,260; and
8,581,710. 81 FR 37210 (June 9, 2016).
The notice of investigation authorized
the Chief Administrative Law Judge to
consolidate Investigation Nos. 337–TA–
990 and 337–TA–1004 if he deemed it
appropriate. Id. at 37211. Thereafter, the
Chief Administrative Law Judge
determined to consolidate the two
investigations. Order No. 3, Inv. No.
337–TA–1004 (June 9, 2016).
On February 9, 2018, the parties filed
a joint motion to terminate the
investigation based on a settlement
agreement reached between Immersion
and Apple that resolves the dispute in
this investigation. On February 16,
2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID
(Order No. 75), granting the motion. The
ALJ found that the motion complies
with Commission Rules and termination
of the investigation will not adversely
affect the public interest. No petition for
review was filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Mar 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 15, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–05637 Filed 3–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1104 (Second
Review)]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted this review on September 1,
2017 (82 FR 41654) and determined on
December 5, 2017 that it would conduct
an expedited review (83 FR 394, January
3, 2018).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determination in
this review on March 15, 2018. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4767 (March
2018), entitled Certain Polyester Staple
Fiber from China: Investigation No. 731–
TA–1104 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 15, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–05695 Filed 3–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Keith F. Ostrosky, D.D.S.; Dismissal of
Proceeding
On August 30, 2017, the Acting
Assistant Administrator, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Keith F. Ostrosky,
D.D.S., of South St. Paul, Minnesota
(hereinafter, Registrant).1 GX 2. The
Show Cause Order proposed the
revocation of Registrant’s Certificate of
Registration on the ground that he does
not ‘‘have . . . state authority to handle
controlled substances.’’ Id. at 1.
As to the jurisdictional basis of the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant is registered as a
practitioner in schedules II through V
under Certificate of Registration No.
BO1259983, at the registered location of
351 15th Ave. N., South St. Paul,
Minnesota. The Order further alleged
that this Registration was due to expire
on December 31, 2017. Id.
As to the substantive basis for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that ‘‘[o]n February 3, 2017, the
Minnesota Board of Dentistry issued a
Stipulation and Order,’’ pursuant to
which the Board accepted Registrant’s
voluntary surrender of his license to
practice dentistry in the State of
Minnesota. Id. The Show Cause Order
thus alleged that Registrant is ‘‘currently
without authority to practice dentistry
or handle controlled substances in the
State of Minnesota, the [S]tate in which
[he is] registered with the DEA,’’ and
that as a consequence, his registration is
subject to revocation. Id. at 1–2.
The Show Cause Order notified
Registrant of his right to request a
hearing on the allegations or to submit
a written statement of position while
waiving his right to a hearing, the
procedure for electing either option, and
the consequence of failing to elect either
option. Id. at 2. The Show Cause Order
also notified Registrant of his right to
submit a Corrective Action Plan
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 824(c)(2)(C). Id.
at 2–3.
On September 9, 2017, the
Government accomplished service of
the Show Cause Order by certified mail,
as evidenced by the signed Return
Receipt Card. GX 4. On November 7,
2017, the Government submitted a
Request for Final Agency Action
(RFAA). Therein, the Government
represents that Registrant did not
1 While for reasons explained in this Decision,
Registrant is now an Ex-Registrant, I refer to him as
Registrant throughout this Decision.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 12406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05695]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1104 (Second Review)]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From China
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), instituted this review on September 1, 2017 (82 FR 41654) and
determined on December 5, 2017 that it would conduct an expedited
review (83 FR 394, January 3, 2018).
The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determination in this review on March 15, 2018. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4767 (March 2018),
entitled Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China: Investigation No.
731-TA-1104 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 15, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-05695 Filed 3-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
