Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 7600(c) To State That the Qualified Open Outcry (“QOO”) Order is Subject to the Trade-Through Exceptions Outlined in Rule 15010(b), 11281-11283 [2018-05162]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
to list options on an underlying
security, and is intended to bring new
options listings to the marketplace
quicker.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 30 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.31
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 32 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),33 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
upon filing. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest as it
will allow the Exchange to modify the
criteria for listing an option on an
underlying covered security to align
with the criteria of other options
exchanges, and the Exchange’s proposal
does not raise new issues. Accordingly,
the Commission hereby waives the 30day operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.34
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
30 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
31 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
33 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
34 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2018–06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–06. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11281
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–06, and
should be submitted on or before April
4, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.35
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–05074 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82845; File No. SR–BOX–
2018–08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rule 7600(c) To State That the
Qualified Open Outcry (‘‘QOO’’) Order
is Subject to the Trade-Through
Exceptions Outlined in Rule 15010(b)
March 9, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
27, 2018, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7600(c) to state that the Qualified
Open Outcry (‘‘QOO’’) Order is subject
to the trade-through exceptions outlined
in Rule 15010(b). The text of the
proposed rule change is available from
the principal office of the Exchange, at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room and also on the Exchange’s
internet website at https://
boxoptions.com.
35 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
11282
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Rule 7600(c) to state
that the Qualified Open Outcry
(‘‘QOO’’) Order is subject to the tradethrough exceptions in Rule 15010(b).3
Currently, BOX Participants must
comply with Exchange rules and the
terms of the Options Order Protection
and Locked/Crossed Market Plan
(‘‘Linkage Plan’’) by honoring any
better-priced Protected Quotes.4 The
Linkage Plan, as codified in BOX Rule
15000 Series, provides that Participants
shall not effect trade-throughs of a
Protected Bid or Offer (collectively, a
‘‘Protected Quote’’), except pursuant to
an applicable exceptions that are
outlined in Sections(b)(1) through (10)
of Rule 15010. A Protected Quote is
defined as a bid or offer in an options
series that (1) is disseminated pursuant
to the OPRA Plan and (2) is the best bid
or offer, respectively, displayed by an
eligible exchange.
The Exchange notes that it recently
adopted rules for an open outcry
3 The Exchange notes that, in practice, QOO
Orders will rely on the exceptions detailed in Rule
15010(b)(4) and (7). Under BOX Rule 15010(b)(4),
an exception to trade-through liability exists if the
transaction that constitutes the Trade-Through is
the execution of an order identified as an
Intermarket Sweep Order (‘‘ISO’’), or the transaction
that constitutes the Trade-Through is effected by
BOX while simultaneously routing an ISO to
execute against the full displayed size of any betterpriced Protected Bid or Offer. Under BOX Rule
15010(b)(7), another exception to Trade-Through
liability exists if the transaction that constituted the
Trade-Through was effected as a portion of a
Complex Trade. This may happen if the Participant
has a Stock Option Complex Order. Because BOX
does not trade equities, the Participant would direct
that portion of the order to another exchange and
execute the option portion on BOX.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54551
(September 29, 2006), 71 FR 59148 (October 6,
2006) (Order Approving NMS Linkage Plan).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Trading Floor.5 These rules included a
statement in Rule 7600(c) that both
sides of the QOO Order must execute at
a price equal to or better than the NBBO.
The Exchange now proposes to add
language to explain that this statement
does not apply if the execution of the
QOO Order is using one of the
exceptions outlined in Rule 15010(b).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
state that ‘‘when a Floor Broker executes
the QOO Order, the execution price
must be equal to or better than the
NBBO, subject to the exceptions in Rule
15010(b).’’
Specifically, pursuant to Rule
15010(b)(4), a QOO Order with an ISO
designation will be submitted to the
Trading Host in the same manner as any
other QOO Order.6 Without an ISO
designation, a QOO Order priced worse
than the NBBO would be rejected. The
Exchange notes that the Floor Broker is
the individual who marks the QOO
Order with an ISO designation and is
responsible for taking out all betterpriced Protected Bids at away
exchanges.7
Upon identifying the QOO Order as
an ISO, the system will execute the
order, regardless of the NBBO.8 A Floor
Broker must ensure that the routing of
any outbound ISOs in connection with
an execution of a QOO Order on the
Trading Floor occur as
contemporaneously as possible.
For example, assume the following at
the time the QOO Order is submitted to
the BOX trading host:
NBBO: .97–1.00
Cboe: .97–1.00 9
Phlx: .97–1.02
Nasdaq ISE: .97–1.03
All other Exchanges: .95–1.05
A QOO Order with an ISO
designation is submitted to the Trading
Host to sell 100 at .96. The QOO Order
will execute regardless of the NBBO.
Contemporaneously, the Floor Broker
must take out all better-priced Protected
Bids. The Floor Broker would send the
following orders to each exchange
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81292
(August 2, 2017), 82 FR 37144 (August 8,
2017)(Order Approving SR–BOX–2016–48 as
modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2).
6 The Exchange notes that the QOO Order with
the ISO designation will be treated in the same
manner as any other QOO Order on the Trading
Floor. The ISO designation simply identifies that
the QOO Order has an ISO designation and must
no longer execute at a price equal to or better than
the NBBO.
7 The Exchange notes that this is identical to the
process for electronic orders.
8 The Exchange notes that the ISO designation
does not allow the QOO Order to ignore interest on
the BOX Book.
9 Assume the away markets are all bidding for 10
contracts.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
displaying a better-priced Protected
Quote, for the full size of the Protected
Quote, contemporaneous with the
execution of the QOO Order on BOX:
Sell 10@.97 Cboe
Sell10@.97 Phlx
Sell 10@.97 Nasdaq ISE
The Exchange notes that other options
exchanges with open outcry trading
floors have made this distinction in the
past in their respective Regulatory
Circulars.10 The Exchange also notes
that Arca and Cboe do not reference
these exceptions in their trading floor
rules. Further, the Exchange believes
that referencing these exceptions in the
BOX Trading Floor rules will provide
clarity and transparency to BOX
Participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act,11 in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,12 in particular, in that the
proposed change is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general protect investors and the public
interest.
The Exchange believes that stating
that both sides of the QOO Order must
execute at a price equal to or better than
the NBBO subject to the exceptions in
Rule 15010(b) is reasonable because it
will provide Participants with more
clarity and transparency with regard to
the Trading Floor rules; specifically,
rules surrounding QOO Orders on the
Trading Floor and their relationship
with the Linkage Plan. Further, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
change is appropriate as other
exchanges have made this clarification
in their respective circulars.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
As discussed above, the Exchange
notes that the proposed rule change is
simply amending Rule 7600(c) to state
10 See NYSE Arca (‘‘Arca’’) Options RB–16–04
available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/
markets/arca-options/rule-interpretations/2016/
NYSE%20Arca%20Options%20RB%2016-04.pdf,
see also Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘Cboe’’) Regulatory Circular RG09–
117 available at https://www.cboe.org/publish/
regcir/rg09-117.pdf. The Exchange notes that it
recently issued a Regulatory Circular reminding
BOX Participants of the rules that must be followed
when trading in open out-cry on the BOX Trading
Floor. See BOX Regulatory Circular RC–2017–17
available at https://boxoptions.com/assets/RC-201717-Order-Protection-Rules-in-Open-OutcryTrading.pdf.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
that the exceptions detailed in Rule
15010(b) apply to Trading Floor
transactions. As mentioned above, other
options exchanges with open out-cry
trading floors have issued Regulatory
Circulars addressing the Linkage Plan
and how it relates to their respective
trading floor rules. As such, the
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 13 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.14
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 15 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 16
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange notes that waiver
of the operative delay would allow it to
implement the proposal immediately
and eliminate the potential for
confusion with regard to QOO Orders
on the Trading Floor and their
relationship to the Linkage Plan. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
14 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
11283
with the protection of investors and the
public interest because the proposed
rule change is designed to provide
clarity and transparency to BOX
Participants with regard to QOO Orders
on the Trading Floor and their
relationship to the Linkage Plan. The
Commission also notes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the practices of other options exchanges,
which are set forth in regulatory
circulars.17 Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.18
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2018–08 and should
be submitted on or before April 4, 2018.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2018–08 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2018–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
17 See
supra note 10.
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 For
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2018–05162 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–82844; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2018–016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Delist the
Shares of the iShares Edge U.S. Fixed
Income Balanced Risk ETF From
Listing Pursuant to Rule 14.11(i) and
Approval Orders Issued by the
Commission as a Series of Managed
Fund Shares, and To Re-List Pursuant
to Rule 14.11(c)(4) as a Series of Index
Fund Shares
March 9, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
28, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11281-11283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05162]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82845; File No. SR-BOX-2018-08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 7600(c) To State That the Qualified Open Outcry (``QOO'')
Order is Subject to the Trade-Through Exceptions Outlined in Rule
15010(b)
March 9, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 27, 2018, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7600(c) to state that the
Qualified Open Outcry (``QOO'') Order is subject to the trade-through
exceptions outlined in Rule 15010(b). The text of the proposed rule
change is available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange's internet
website at https://boxoptions.com.
[[Page 11282]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 7600(c) to
state that the Qualified Open Outcry (``QOO'') Order is subject to the
trade-through exceptions in Rule 15010(b).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange notes that, in practice, QOO Orders will rely
on the exceptions detailed in Rule 15010(b)(4) and (7). Under BOX
Rule 15010(b)(4), an exception to trade-through liability exists if
the transaction that constitutes the Trade-Through is the execution
of an order identified as an Intermarket Sweep Order (``ISO''), or
the transaction that constitutes the Trade-Through is effected by
BOX while simultaneously routing an ISO to execute against the full
displayed size of any better-priced Protected Bid or Offer. Under
BOX Rule 15010(b)(7), another exception to Trade-Through liability
exists if the transaction that constituted the Trade-Through was
effected as a portion of a Complex Trade. This may happen if the
Participant has a Stock Option Complex Order. Because BOX does not
trade equities, the Participant would direct that portion of the
order to another exchange and execute the option portion on BOX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, BOX Participants must comply with Exchange rules and the
terms of the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan
(``Linkage Plan'') by honoring any better-priced Protected Quotes.\4\
The Linkage Plan, as codified in BOX Rule 15000 Series, provides that
Participants shall not effect trade-throughs of a Protected Bid or
Offer (collectively, a ``Protected Quote''), except pursuant to an
applicable exceptions that are outlined in Sections(b)(1) through (10)
of Rule 15010. A Protected Quote is defined as a bid or offer in an
options series that (1) is disseminated pursuant to the OPRA Plan and
(2) is the best bid or offer, respectively, displayed by an eligible
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54551 (September 29,
2006), 71 FR 59148 (October 6, 2006) (Order Approving NMS Linkage
Plan).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that it recently adopted rules for an open
outcry Trading Floor.\5\ These rules included a statement in Rule
7600(c) that both sides of the QOO Order must execute at a price equal
to or better than the NBBO. The Exchange now proposes to add language
to explain that this statement does not apply if the execution of the
QOO Order is using one of the exceptions outlined in Rule 15010(b).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to state that ``when a Floor Broker
executes the QOO Order, the execution price must be equal to or better
than the NBBO, subject to the exceptions in Rule 15010(b).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81292 (August 2,
2017), 82 FR 37144 (August 8, 2017)(Order Approving SR-BOX-2016-48
as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, pursuant to Rule 15010(b)(4), a QOO Order with an ISO
designation will be submitted to the Trading Host in the same manner as
any other QOO Order.\6\ Without an ISO designation, a QOO Order priced
worse than the NBBO would be rejected. The Exchange notes that the
Floor Broker is the individual who marks the QOO Order with an ISO
designation and is responsible for taking out all better-priced
Protected Bids at away exchanges.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange notes that the QOO Order with the ISO
designation will be treated in the same manner as any other QOO
Order on the Trading Floor. The ISO designation simply identifies
that the QOO Order has an ISO designation and must no longer execute
at a price equal to or better than the NBBO.
\7\ The Exchange notes that this is identical to the process for
electronic orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon identifying the QOO Order as an ISO, the system will execute
the order, regardless of the NBBO.\8\ A Floor Broker must ensure that
the routing of any outbound ISOs in connection with an execution of a
QOO Order on the Trading Floor occur as contemporaneously as possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange notes that the ISO designation does not allow
the QOO Order to ignore interest on the BOX Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, assume the following at the time the QOO Order is
submitted to the BOX trading host:
NBBO: .97-1.00
Cboe: .97-1.00 \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Assume the away markets are all bidding for 10 contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phlx: .97-1.02
Nasdaq ISE: .97-1.03
All other Exchanges: .95-1.05
A QOO Order with an ISO designation is submitted to the Trading
Host to sell 100 at .96. The QOO Order will execute regardless of the
NBBO. Contemporaneously, the Floor Broker must take out all better-
priced Protected Bids. The Floor Broker would send the following orders
to each exchange displaying a better-priced Protected Quote, for the
full size of the Protected Quote, contemporaneous with the execution of
the QOO Order on BOX:
Sell [email protected] Cboe
[email protected] Phlx
Sell [email protected] Nasdaq ISE
The Exchange notes that other options exchanges with open outcry
trading floors have made this distinction in the past in their
respective Regulatory Circulars.\10\ The Exchange also notes that Arca
and Cboe do not reference these exceptions in their trading floor
rules. Further, the Exchange believes that referencing these exceptions
in the BOX Trading Floor rules will provide clarity and transparency to
BOX Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See NYSE Arca (``Arca'') Options RB-16-04 available at
https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/arca-options/rule-interpretations/2016/NYSE%20Arca%20Options%20RB%2016-04.pdf, see
also Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``Cboe'')
Regulatory Circular RG09-117 available at https://www.cboe.org/publish/regcir/rg09-117.pdf. The Exchange notes that it recently
issued a Regulatory Circular reminding BOX Participants of the rules
that must be followed when trading in open out-cry on the BOX
Trading Floor. See BOX Regulatory Circular RC-2017-17 available at
https://boxoptions.com/assets/RC-2017-17-Order-Protection-Rules-in-Open-Outcry-Trading.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that the proposed change is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that stating that both sides of the QOO Order
must execute at a price equal to or better than the NBBO subject to the
exceptions in Rule 15010(b) is reasonable because it will provide
Participants with more clarity and transparency with regard to the
Trading Floor rules; specifically, rules surrounding QOO Orders on the
Trading Floor and their relationship with the Linkage Plan. Further,
the Exchange believes that the proposed change is appropriate as other
exchanges have made this clarification in their respective circulars.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
As discussed above, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule
change is simply amending Rule 7600(c) to state
[[Page 11283]]
that the exceptions detailed in Rule 15010(b) apply to Trading Floor
transactions. As mentioned above, other options exchanges with open
out-cry trading floors have issued Regulatory Circulars addressing the
Linkage Plan and how it relates to their respective trading floor
rules. As such, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \16\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
notes that waiver of the operative delay would allow it to implement
the proposal immediately and eliminate the potential for confusion with
regard to QOO Orders on the Trading Floor and their relationship to the
Linkage Plan. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposed rule change is designed to provide
clarity and transparency to BOX Participants with regard to QOO Orders
on the Trading Floor and their relationship to the Linkage Plan. The
Commission also notes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the practices of other options exchanges, which are set forth in
regulatory circulars.\17\ Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\17\ See supra note 10.
\18\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2018-08 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2018-08. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2018-08 and should be submitted on
or before April 4, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-05162 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P