Fees, 11145-11146 [2018-05088]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
36 CFR Part 1258
This final order refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 872
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 872 is
amended as follows:
PART 872—DENTAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 872
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. In § 872.3570, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
■
§ 872.3570
OTC denture repair kit.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classification. Class II. The OTC
denture repair kit is exempt from
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to § 872.9. The special controls
for this device are FDA’s:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 8, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–05116 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
Drawbridge Operations Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
CFR Correction
In Title 33 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 1 to 124, revised as of
July 1, 2017, on page 646, in § 117.739,
paragraph (o) is removed and reserved.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–05245 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
[FDMS No. NARA–18–0001; NARA–2018–
019]
RIN 3095–AB96
Fees
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
NARA is amending our Fees
regulation to shorten the period in
which people who request copies of
archival records may request a refund.
This shorter period is in line with other
similar research and archival
institutions and is designed to reduce
the administrative costs of processing a
large number of refund requests that fall
outside the permitted bases.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 13,
2018 without further notice, unless we
receive adverse written comment that
warrants revision by April 3, 2018. If we
receive such comments, we will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3095–AB95, by email
at regulation_comments@nara.gov, or by
mail to the External Policy Program
Manager; Strategy Division (MP), Suite
4100; National Archives and Records
Administration; 8601 Adelphi Road;
College Park, MD 20740–6001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Keravuori, by email at
regulation_comments@nara.gov, or by
telephone at 301–837–3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
NARA is authorized by 44 U.S.C.
2116(c) to charge reproduction fees
when it reproduces documents for nonFederal individuals or entities. This
includes official reproductions with the
Archives’ seal, reproductions of
archival holdings, and reproductions of
operational records. The statute
authorizes NARA to recoup its costs,
equipment fees, and similar expenses,
and to retain the fees as part of the
National Archives Trust Fund (NATF).
NARA promulgated regulations at 36
CFR part 1258 to notify users of the fee
structure and processes. Among these
regulations is a section addressing
refunds of these fees (36 CFR 1258.16).
It is this provision that we are revising
with this rulemaking.
Due to various factors, it is
occasionally difficult for us to make a
legible reproduction, particularly of old
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11145
documents. We notify customers if we
anticipate the reproduction will have
questionable legibility and request the
customer’s approval to proceed with the
reproduction—and the fee charges. As a
result, we do not provide refunds except
in special cases; primarily if we have
somehow processed an order incorrectly
or it contains errors. However, the
regulation’s refund request period is of
such a length (120 days) that the NATF
has been receiving a significant number
of refund requests for orders that
contain no errors and were processed
correctly, which is causing the NATF
administrative processing burdens. As a
result, we are now reducing the refund
request period to 30 days, which we
believe will reduce the number of these
other types of refund requests. A 30-day
refund period is also in line with similar
deadlines at other research and archival
institutions that allow refund requests,
such as the Library of Congress. Many
such organizations do not permit
refunds at all (e.g., USCIS Genealogy
Program). We would like to continue
permitting refunds when there has been
an error, but we believe the shorter
period will still provide sufficient time
in which to request a refund while
reducing the inappropriate refund
requests and NARA’s administrative
costs.
Regulatory Review Information
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
E.O. 12866 and a significance
determination was requested from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). It is also not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8,
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking. As a result, this rule is also
not subject to deregulatory requirements
contained in E.O. 13771. As required by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we
certify that this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities; it simply
shortens the period in which people
may request refunds of reproduction
fees. This rule also does not have any
Federalism implications.
This rule is effective upon publication
for good cause as permitted by the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3)). NARA believes that a public
comment period is unnecessary as this
rule merely shortens the recently added
refund request period to bring it in line
with similar periods at other research
and archival institutions, such as the
Library of Congress.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1258
Archives and records.
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
11146
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, NARA amends 36 CFR part
1258 as follows:
PART 1258—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1258
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2126(c) and 44 U.S.C.
2307.
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan quota transfer
provisions. This announcement informs
the public of the revised commercial
quotas for North Carolina and
Massachusetts.
Effective March 9, 2018, through
December 31, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Hanson, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9180.
§ 1258.16
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the summer
flounder fishery are found in 50 CFR
648.100 through 648.110. These
regulations require annual specification
of a commercial quota that is
apportioned among the coastal states
from Maine through North Carolina. The
process to set the annual commercial
quota and the percent allocated to each
state is described in § 648.102, and the
initial 2018 allocations were published
on December 22, 2017 (82 FR 60682),
and corrected January 30, 2018 (83 FR
4165).
The final rule implementing
Amendment 5 to the Summer Flounder
Fishery Management Plan, as published
in the Federal Register on December 17,
1993 (58 FR 65936), provided a
mechanism for transferring summer
flounder commercial quota from one
state to another. Two or more states,
under mutual agreement and with the
concurrence of the NMFS Greater
Atlantic Regional Administrator, can
transfer or combine summer flounder
commercial quota under § 648.102(c)(2).
The Regional Administrator is required
to consider the criteria in
§ 648.102(c)(2)(i)(A) through (C) in the
evaluation of requests for quota transfers
or combinations.
North Carolina is transferring 5,450 lb
(2,472 kg) of summer flounder
commercial quota to Massachusetts.
This transfer was requested to repay
landings by a North Carolina-permitted
vessel that landed in Massachusetts
under a safe harbor agreement. Based on
the initial quotas published in the 2018
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea
Bass Specifications and subsequent
adjustments, the revised summer
flounder quotas for calendar year 2018
are now: North Carolina, 1,755,989 lb
(796,503 kg); and Massachusetts,
410,192 lb (186,060 kg).
What is NARA’s refund policy?
* * * If you feel we processed your
order incorrectly or it contains errors,
please contact us within 30 days of your
delivery date to have your issue
verified. * * *
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2018–05088 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
Satellite Communications
CFR Correction
In Title 47 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 20 to 39, revised as of
October 1, 2017, on page 265, the
Effective Date Note at the end of
§ 25.220 is removed.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–05247 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 170828822–70999–02]
RIN 0648–XG063
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Summer Flounder Fishery;
Quota Transfer
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
NMFS announces that the
State of North Carolina is transferring a
portion of its 2018 commercial summer
flounder quota to the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts. This quota adjustment is
necessary to comply with the Summer
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
[FR Doc. 2018–05169 Filed 3–9–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DATES:
2. Amend § 1258.16 by revising the
sixth sentence to read as follows:
■
Dated: March 9, 2018.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
Classification
This action is taken under 50 CFR
part 648 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 170817773–8213–02]
RIN 0648–BG81
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Highly Migratory Fisheries; California
Drift Gillnet Fishery; Implementation of
a Federal Limited Entry Drift Gillnet
Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS is issuing regulations
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA) to implement a
March 2017 recommendation by the
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Pacific Council) to amend the Fishery
Management Plan for U.S. West Coast
Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species
(HMS FMP). The rule implements
Amendment 5 to the HMS FMP and
establishes a Federal limited entry (LE)
permit system for the California/Oregon
large-mesh drift gillnet (DGN) fishery
using standards that are very similar to
those used in the existing State of
California LE permit program for the
DGN fishery. Amendment 5 is intended
to streamline management and future
decision-making by placing all aspects
of DGN fishery management under MSA
authority. All current California LE DGN
permit holders are eligible to apply for,
and receive, a Federal LE DGN permit,
and no additional LE DGN permits are
created under this rule. This final rule
is administrative in nature and is not
anticipated to result in increased
activity, effort, or capacity in the
fishery.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents that were prepared for this
final rule, including the Regulatory
Impact Review and the proposed rule,
are available via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11145-11146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05088]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1258
[FDMS No. NARA-18-0001; NARA-2018-019]
RIN 3095-AB96
Fees
AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NARA is amending our Fees regulation to shorten the period in
which people who request copies of archival records may request a
refund. This shorter period is in line with other similar research and
archival institutions and is designed to reduce the administrative
costs of processing a large number of refund requests that fall outside
the permitted bases.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 13, 2018 without further notice,
unless we receive adverse written comment that warrants revision by
April 3, 2018. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3095-AB95, by
email at [email protected], or by mail to the External
Policy Program Manager; Strategy Division (MP), Suite 4100; National
Archives and Records Administration; 8601 Adelphi Road; College Park,
MD 20740-6001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Keravuori, by email at
[email protected], or by telephone at 301-837-3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NARA is authorized by 44 U.S.C. 2116(c) to charge reproduction fees
when it reproduces documents for non-Federal individuals or entities.
This includes official reproductions with the
Archives' seal, reproductions of archival holdings, and
reproductions of operational records. The statute authorizes NARA to
recoup its costs, equipment fees, and similar expenses, and to retain
the fees as part of the National Archives Trust Fund (NATF). NARA
promulgated regulations at 36 CFR part 1258 to notify users of the fee
structure and processes. Among these regulations is a section
addressing refunds of these fees (36 CFR 1258.16). It is this provision
that we are revising with this rulemaking.
Due to various factors, it is occasionally difficult for us to make
a legible reproduction, particularly of old documents. We notify
customers if we anticipate the reproduction will have questionable
legibility and request the customer's approval to proceed with the
reproduction--and the fee charges. As a result, we do not provide
refunds except in special cases; primarily if we have somehow processed
an order incorrectly or it contains errors. However, the regulation's
refund request period is of such a length (120 days) that the NATF has
been receiving a significant number of refund requests for orders that
contain no errors and were processed correctly, which is causing the
NATF administrative processing burdens. As a result, we are now
reducing the refund request period to 30 days, which we believe will
reduce the number of these other types of refund requests. A 30-day
refund period is also in line with similar deadlines at other research
and archival institutions that allow refund requests, such as the
Library of Congress. Many such organizations do not permit refunds at
all (e.g., USCIS Genealogy Program). We would like to continue
permitting refunds when there has been an error, but we believe the
shorter period will still provide sufficient time in which to request a
refund while reducing the inappropriate refund requests and NARA's
administrative costs.
Regulatory Review Information
This rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes
of E.O. 12866 and a significance determination was requested from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It is also not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8, Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking. As a result, this rule is also not subject to deregulatory
requirements contained in E.O. 13771. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we certify that this rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities; it simply shortens
the period in which people may request refunds of reproduction fees.
This rule also does not have any Federalism implications.
This rule is effective upon publication for good cause as permitted
by the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). NARA believes
that a public comment period is unnecessary as this rule merely
shortens the recently added refund request period to bring it in line
with similar periods at other research and archival institutions, such
as the Library of Congress.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1258
Archives and records.
[[Page 11146]]
For the reasons stated in the preamble, NARA amends 36 CFR part
1258 as follows:
PART 1258--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 1258 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2126(c) and 44 U.S.C. 2307.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1258.16 by revising the sixth sentence to read as
follows:
Sec. 1258.16 What is NARA's refund policy?
* * * If you feel we processed your order incorrectly or it
contains errors, please contact us within 30 days of your delivery date
to have your issue verified. * * *
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2018-05088 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P