Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 402, Criteria for Underlying Securities, 11269-11273 [2018-05073]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
rule change does not unfairly
discriminate among issuers consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, and the
proposed rule change is appropriate and
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the
Act in that it does not impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.20
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,21 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2018–
01), be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–05076 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82832; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2018–005]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on a Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Shares
of the Cboe Vest S&P 500® Premium
Income ETF Under Rule 14.11(c)(5)
March 8, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
On January 10, 2018, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘BZX’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of the Cboe Vest S&P 500®
Premium Income ETF under BZX Rule
14.11(c)(5). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on January 26, 2018.3
The Commission received no comments
on the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
20 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5), and (8).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82538
(January 19, 2018), 83 FR 3807.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
21 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this filing
is March 12, 2018.
The Commission is extending the 45day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the Exchange’s proposal.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,5 the Commission
designates April 26, 2018, as the date by
which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–CboeBZX–2018–005).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–05077 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82827; File No. SR–
PEARL–2018–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 402, Criteria for Underlying
Securities
March 8, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on February 22, 2018, MIAX PEARL,
LLC (‘‘MIAX PEARL’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change’’) a proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
11269
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend Exchange Rule 402, Criteria for
Underlying Securities, to modify the
criteria for listing an option on an
underlying covered security.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/pearl at MIAX PEARL’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 402, Criteria for
Underlying Securities, to modify the
criteria for listing options on an
underlying security as defined in
Section 18(b)(1)(A) of the Securities Act
of 1933 (hereinafter ‘‘covered security’’
or ‘‘covered securities’’). This is a
competitive filing that is based on a
proposal recently submitted by Nasdaq
PHLX LLC (‘‘Nasdaq Phlx’’) and
approved by the Commission.3
In particular, the Exchange proposes
to modify Rule 402(b)(5)(i) to permit the
listing of an option on an underlying
covered security that has a market price
of at least $3.00 per share for the
previous three (3) consecutive business
days preceding the date on which the
Exchange submits a certificate to the
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’)
for listing and trading. The Exchange
does not intend to amend any other
criteria for listing options on an
underlying security in Rule 402.
Currently the underlying covered
security must have a closing market
5 15
6 17
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82474
(January 9, 2018), 83 FR 2240 (January 16, 2018)
(Order Approving SR–Phlx–2017–75).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
11270
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
price of $3.00 per share for the previous
five (5) consecutive business days
preceding the date on which the
Exchange submits a listing certificate to
OCC. In the proposed amendment, the
market price will still be measured by
the closing price reported in the primary
market in which the underlying covered
security is traded, but the measurement
will be the price over the prior three (3)
consecutive business day period
preceding the submission of the listing
certificate to OCC, instead of the prior
five (5) business day period.
The Exchange acknowledges that the
Options Listing Procedures Plan 4
requires that the listing certificate be
provided to OCC no earlier than 12:01
a.m. and no later than 11:00 a.m.
(Chicago time) on the trading day prior
to the day on which trading is to begin.5
The proposed amendment will still
comport with that requirement. For
example, if an initial public offering
(‘‘IPO’’) occurs at 11:00 a.m. on Monday,
the earliest date the Exchange could
submit its listing certificate to OCC
would be on Thursday by 12:01 a.m.
(Chicago time), with the market price
determined by the closing price over the
three-day period from Monday through
Wednesday. The option on the IPO
would then be eligible for trading on the
Exchange on Friday. The proposed
amendment would essentially enable
options trading within four (4) business
days of an IPO becoming available
instead of six (6) business days (five (5)
consecutive days plus the day the listing
certificate is submitted to OCC).
The Exchange’s initial listing
standards for equity options in Rule 402
(including the current price/time
standard of $3.00 per share for five (5)
consecutive business days) are
substantially similar to the initial listing
standards adopted by other options
exchanges.6 At the time the Exchange
received its initial approval from the
4 The Plan for the Purpose of Developing and
Implementing Procedures Designed to Facilitate the
Listing and Trading of Standardized Options
Submitted Pursuant to Section 11a(2)(3)(B) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a/k/a the Options
Listing Procedures Plan (‘‘OLPP’’)) is a national
market system plan that, among other things, sets
forth procedures governing the listing of new
options series. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 44521 (July 6, 2001), 66 FR 36809 (July 13,
2001) (Order approving OLPP). The sponsors of
OLPP include OCC; BATS Exchange, Inc.; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq MRX, LLC;
NYSE American, LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc.
5 See OLPP at page 3.
6 See, e.g., Phlx Rule 1009, Commentary .01; see
also BOX Rule 5020(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Commission, as part of its Rules, the
Exchange adopted the ‘‘look back’’
period of five (5) consecutive business
days, it determined that the five-day
period was sufficient to protect against
attempts to manipulate the market price
of the underlying security and would
provide a reliable test for stability.7
Surveillance technologies and
procedures concerning manipulation
have evolved since then to provide
adequate prevention or detection of rule
or securities law violations within the
proposed time frame, and the Exchange
represents that its existing trading
surveillances are adequate to monitor
the trading of options on the Exchange.8
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that
the scope of its surveillance program
also includes cross market surveillance
for trading that is not just limited to the
Exchange. In particular, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’), pursuant to a regulatory
services agreement, operates a range of
cross-market equity surveillance
patterns on behalf of the Exchange to
look for potential manipulative
behavior, including spoofing, algorithm
gaming, marking the close and open,
and momentum ignition strategies, as
well as more general, abusive behavior
related to front running, wash shales,
quoting/routing, and Reg SHO
violations. These cross-market patterns
incorporate relevant data from various
markets beyond the Exchange and its
affiliate, Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX Options’’),
including data from the New York Stock
Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) and from the
Nasdaq Stock Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’).
Additionally, for options, MIAX
PEARL, through FINRA, utilizes an
array of patterns that monitor
manipulation of options, or
manipulation of equity securities
(regardless of venue) for the purpose of
impacting options prices on both MIAX
Options and MIAX PEARL options
markets (i.e., mini-manipulation
strategies). Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the cross market
surveillance performed by FINRA on
behalf of the Exchange, coupled with
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79543
(December 13, 2016), 81 FR 92901 (December 20,
2016) (order granting approval of MIAX PEARL for
registration as a National Securities Exchange).
8 Such surveillance procedures generally focus on
detecting securities trading subject to opening price
manipulation, closing price manipulation, layering,
spoofing or other unlawful activity impacting an
underlying security, the option, or both. The
Exchange, through the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’), has price
movement alerts, unusual market activity and order
book alerts active for all trading symbols. These real
time patterns are active for the new security as soon
as the IPO begins trading.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Exchange staff’s real-time
monitoring of similarly violative activity
on MIAX PEARL and its affiliated
market as described herein, reflects a
comprehensive surveillance program
that is adequate to monitor for
manipulation of the underlying security
and overlying option within the
proposed three-day look back period.
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that
the proposed listing criteria would still
require that the underlying security be
listed on NYSE, the American Stock
Exchange (now known as NYSE
American), or the National Market
System of The Nasdaq Stock Market
(now known as the Nasdaq Global
Market) (collectively, the ‘‘Named
Markets’’), as provided for in the
definition of ‘‘covered security’’ from
Section 18(b)(1)(A) of the 1933 Act.9
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would still
ensure that the underlying security
meets the high listing standards of a
Named Market, and would also ensure
that the underlying is covered by the
regulatory protections (including market
surveillance, investigation and
enforcement) offered by these exchanges
for trading in covered securities
conducted on their facilities.
Furthermore, the Nasdaq, Nasdaq
Phlx’s affiliated listing market, had no
cases within the past five years where
an IPO-related issue for which it had
pricing information qualified for the
$3.00 price requirement during the first
three (3) days of trading and did not
qualify for the $3.00 price requirement
during the first five (5) days.10 In other
words, none of these qualifying issues
fell below the $3.00 threshold within
the first three (3) or five (5) days of
trading. As such, the Exchange believes
that its existing surveillance
technologies and procedures, coupled
with Nasdaq’s findings related to the
IPO-related issues as described herein,
adequately address potential concerns
regarding possible manipulation or
price stability within the proposed
timeframe.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed look back period can be
implemented in connection with the
other initial listing criteria for
underlying covered securities. In
9 See
15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)(A).
were over 750 IPO-related issues on
Nasdaq within the past five years. Out of all of the
issues with pricing information, there was only one
issue that had a price below $3 during the first five
consecutive business days. The Exchange notes,
however, that Nasdaq allows for companies to list
on the Nasdaq Capital Market at $2.00 or $3.00 per
share in some instances, which was the case for this
particular issue. See Nasdaq Rule 5500 Series for
initial listing standards on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. See also supra note 3.
10 There
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
particular, the Exchange recognizes that
it may be difficult to verify the number
of shareholders in the days immediately
following an IPO due to the fact that
stock trades generally clear within two
business days (T+2) of their trade date
and therefore the shareholder count will
generally not be known until T+2.11 The
Exchange notes that the current T+2
settlement cycle was recently reduced
from T+3 on September 5, 2017 in
connection with the Commission’s
amendments to Exchange Rule 15c6–
1(a) to adopt the shortened settlement
cycle,12 and the look back period of
three (3) consecutive business days
proposed herein reflects this shortened
T+2 settlement period. As proposed,
stock trades would clear within T+2 of
their trade date (i.e., within three (3)
business days) and therefore the number
of shareholders could be verified within
three (3) business days, thereby enabling
options trading within four (4) business
days of an IPO (three (3) consecutive
business days plus the day the listing
certificate is submitted to OCC).
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that
it can verify the shareholder count with
various brokerage firms that have a large
retail customer clientele. Such firms can
confirm the number of individual
customers who have a position in the
new issue. The earliest that these firms
can provide confirmation is usually the
day after the first day of trading (T+1)
on an unsettled basis, while others can
confirm on the third day of trading
(T+2). The Exchange has confirmed
with some of these brokerage firms who
provide shareholder numbers to the
Exchange that they are T+2 after an IPO.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange
believes that basing the proposed three
(3) business day look back period on the
T+2 settlement cycle would allow for
sufficient verification of the number of
shareholders.
The proposed rule change will apply
to all covered securities that meet the
criteria of Rule 402. Pursuant to Rule
402, the Exchange establishes guidelines
to be considered in evaluating the
potential underlying securities for
Exchange option transactions.13
However, the fact that a particular
security may meet the guidelines
established by the Exchange does not
11 The number of shareholders of record can be
validated by large clearing agencies such as The
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
(‘‘DTCC’’) upon the settlement date (i.e., T+2).
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78962
(September 28, 2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5,
2016) (Amendment to Securities Transaction
Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7–22–16).
13 See Exchange Rule 402(b). The Exchange
established specific criteria to be considered in
evaluating potential underlying securities for
Exchange Option Transactions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
necessarily mean that it will be
approved as an underlying security.14
As part of the established criteria, the
issuer must be in compliance with any
applicable requirement of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.15 Additionally,
in considering the underlying security,
the Exchange relies on information
made publicly available by the issuer
and/or the markets in which the
security is traded.16 Even if the
proposed option meets the objective
criteria, the Exchange may decide not to
list, or place limitations or conditions
upon listing.17 The Exchange believes
that these measures, together with its
existing surveillance procedures,
provide adequate safeguards in the
review of any covered security that may
meet the proposed criteria for
consideration of the option within the
timeframe contained in this proposal.
The Exchange notes that this filing is
substantially similar to a companion
MIAX Options filing, modifying the
criteria for listing an option on an
underlying covered security on its
exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
MIAX PEARL believes that its
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 18 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act 19 in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes to its listing standards
for covered securities would allow the
Exchange to more quickly list options
on a qualifying covered security that has
met the $3.00 eligibility price without
sacrificing investor protection. As
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that its existing trading surveillances
provide a sufficient measure of
protection against potential price
manipulation within the proposed three
(3) consecutive business day timeframe.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed three (3) consecutive business
day timeframe would continue to be a
14 Id.
15 See
Exchange Rule 402(b)(3).
Exchange Rule 402(d).
17 See Exchange Rule 402(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 See
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11271
reliable test for price stability in light of
Nasdaq’s findings that none of the IPOrelated issues on Nasdaq within the past
five years that qualified for the $3.00 per
share price standard during the first
three trading days fell below the $3.00
threshold during the fourth or fifth
trading day. Furthermore, the
established guidelines to be considered
by the Exchange in evaluating the
potential underlying securities for
Exchange option transactions,20 together
with existing trading surveillances,
provide adequate safeguards in the
review of any covered security that may
meet the proposed criteria for
consideration of the option within the
proposed timeframe.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that basing the proposed timeframe on
the T+2 settlement cycle adequately
addresses the potential difficulties in
confirming the number of shareholders
of the underlying covered security.
Having some of the largest brokerage
firms that provide these shareholder
counts to the Exchange confirm that
they are able to provide these numbers
within T+2 further demonstrates that
the 2,000 shareholder requirement can
be sufficiently verified within the
proposed timeframe. For the foregoing
reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposed amendments will remove and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system by providing an avenue for
investors to swiftly hedge their
investment in the stock in a shorter
amount of time than what is currently
in place.21
Finally, it should be noted that a
price/time standard for the underlying
security was first adopted when the
listed options market was in its infancy,
and was intended to prevent the
proliferation of options being listed on
low-priced securities that presented
special manipulation concerns and/or
lacked liquidity needed to maintain fair
and orderly markets.22 When options
trading commenced in 1973, the
Commission determined that it was
necessary for securities underlying
options to meet certain minimum
standards regarding both the quality of
the issuer and the quality of the market
20 See
notes 13–17 above.
proposed rule change does not alter any
obligations of issuers or other investors of an IPO
that may be subject to a lock-up or other restrictions
on trading related securities.
22 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29628
(August 29, 1991), 56 FR 43949–01 (September 5,
1991) (SR–AMEX–86–21; SR–CBOE–86–15; SR–
NYSE–86–20; SR–PSE–86–15; and SR–PHLX–86–
21) (‘‘1991 Approval Order’’) ay 43949 (discussing
the Commission’s concerns when options trading
initially commenced in 1973).
21 This
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
11272
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
for a particular security.23 These
standards, including a price/time
standard, were imposed to ensure that
those issuers upon whose securities
options were to be traded were widelyheld, financially sound companies
whose shares had trading volume and
float substantial enough so as not to be
readily susceptible to manipulation.24
At the time, the Commission
determined that the imposition of these
standards was reasonable in view of the
pilot nature of options trading and the
limited experience of investors with
options trading.25
Now more than 40 years later, the
listed options market has evolved into a
mature market with sophisticated
investors. In view of this evolution, the
Commission has approved various
exchange proposals to relax some of
these initial listing standards
throughout the years,26 including
reducing the price/time standard in
2003 from $7.50 per share for the
majority of business days over a three
month period to the current $3.00 per
share/five business day standard (‘‘2003
Proposal’’).27 It has been almost fifteen
years since the Commission approved
the 2003 proposal, and both the listed
options market and exchange
technologies have continued to evolve
since then. In this instance, MIAX
PEARL is only proposing a modest
reduction of the current five (5) business
day standard to three (3) business days
to correspond to the securities
industry’s move to a T+2 standard
settlement cycle.28 The $3.00 per share
standard and all other initial options
listing criteria in Rule 402 will remain
unchanged by this proposal. For the
reasons discussed herein, the Exchange
therefore believes that the proposed
three (3) business day period will be
beneficial to the marketplace without
sacrificing investor protections.
23 See
1991 Approval Order at 43949.
24 Id.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
25 Id.
26 See e.g., 1991 Approval Order (modifying a
number of initial listing criteria, including the
reduction of the price/time standard from $10 per
share each day during the preceding three calendar
months to $7.50 per share for the majority of days
during the same period).
27 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
47190 (January 15, 2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22,
2003) (SR–CBOE–2002–62); 47352 (February 11,
2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR–PCX–
2003–06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352
(March 19, 2003) (SR–ISE–2003–04); 47613 (April
1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) (SR–Amex–
2003–19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076
(May 9, 2003) (SR–Phlx–2003–27).
28 See supra note 12.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In this regard
and as indicated above, the Exchange
notes that the rule change is being
proposed as a competitive response to a
filing submitted by Nasdaq Phlx that
was recently approved by the
Commission.29 The proposed rule
change will reduce the number of days
to list options on an underlying
security, and is intended to bring new
options listings to the marketplace
quicker.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 30 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.31
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 32 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),33 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
upon filing. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of
29 See
supra note 3.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
33 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
30 15
31 17
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investors and the public interest as it
will allow the Exchange to modify the
criteria for listing an option on an
underlying covered security to align
with the criteria of other options
exchanges, and the Exchange’s proposal
does not raise new issues. Accordingly,
the Commission hereby waives the 30day operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.34
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
PEARL–2018–04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2018–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
34 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Notices
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2018–04, and
should be submitted on or before April
4, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.35
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–05073 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82842; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2017–005]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Shares
of a Series of the Cboe Vest S&P 500
Buffer Protect Strategy ETF Under the
ETF Series Solutions Trust Under Rule
14.11(c)(3), Index Fund Shares
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
March 9, 2018
I. Introduction
On November 21, 2017, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to list and trade, under BZX
Rule 14.11(c)(3), shares (‘‘Shares’’) of a
series of the Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer
Protect Strategy ETF (individually,
‘‘Fund,’’ and, collectively, ‘‘Funds’’)
under the ETF Series Solutions Trust
(‘‘Trust’’). The proposed rule change
35 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on December 11,
2017.3 On January 22, 2018, the
Commission extended the time period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change to
March 11, 2018.4 The Commission has
received no comment letters on the
proposed rule change. This order
institutes proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 5 to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed
rule change.
II. Exchange’s Description of the
Proposed Rule Change 6
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade the Shares of the Funds under
BZX Rule 14.11(c)(3), which governs the
listing and trading of Index Fund
Shares. In total, the Exchange is
proposing to list and trade Shares of
twelve monthly series of the Cboe Vest
S&P 500® Buffer Protect Strategy ETF.
Each Fund will be an index-based
exchange traded fund (‘‘ETF’’). The
Funds will include the following: Cboe
Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect Strategy
(January) ETF; Cboe Vest S&P 500®
Buffer Protect Strategy (February) ETF;
Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect
Strategy (March) ETF; Cboe Vest S&P
500® Buffer Protect Strategy (April)
ETF; Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect
Strategy (May) ETF; Cboe Vest S&P 500®
Buffer Protect Strategy (June) ETF; Cboe
Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect Strategy
(July) ETF; Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer
Protect Strategy (August) ETF; Cboe
Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect Strategy
(September) ETF; Cboe Vest S&P 500®
Buffer Protect Strategy (October) ETF;
Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect
Strategy (November) ETF; and Cboe Vest
S&P 500® Buffer Protect Strategy
(December) ETF. Each Fund will be
based on the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer
Protect Index (Month) Series, where
‘‘Month’’ is the corresponding month
associated with the roll date of the
applicable Fund (individually, ‘‘Index,’’
and, collectively, ‘‘Indexes’’).
The Shares will be offered by the
Trust, which was established as a
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82217
(December 5, 2017), 82 FR 58243 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82558,
83 FR 3820 (January 26, 2018).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
6 A more detailed description of the Trust, the
Funds, and the Shares, as well as the availability
of price information and other information
regarding the Indexes (as defined herein) and the
Funds’ portfolio holdings, are included in the
Notice and Registration Statement (as defined
herein). See Notice, supra note 3; Registration
Statement, infra note 7 and accompanying text.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11273
Delaware statutory trust on February 9,
2012. The Trust is registered with the
Commission as an open-end investment
company and has filed a registration
statement on behalf of the Funds on
Form N–1A (‘‘Registration Statement’’)
with the Commission.7 The Funds’
adviser will be Cboe Vest Financial, LLC
(‘‘Adviser’’), and the index provider will
be Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’
or ‘‘Index Provider’’).
Each Fund’s investment objective is to
track, before fees and expenses, the
performance of its respective Index. The
value of each Index is calculated daily
by Cboe Options utilizing an option
valuation model. The Exchange is
submitting this proposed rule change
because the Indexes for the Funds do
not meet the listing requirements of
BZX Rule 14.11(c)(3) applicable to an
index that consists of equity securities.
Specifically, the Indexes for the Funds
do not meet the listing requirements of
BZX Rule 14.11(c)(3) because the
Indexes consist of options based on an
index of U.S. Component Stocks.8
Cboe Vest S&P 500® Buffer Protect
Indexes
Each Index is a rules-based options
index that consists exclusively of
FLexible EXchange Options on the S&P
500 Index (‘‘FLEX Options’’) listed on
Cboe Options.9 The Indexes are
designed to provide exposure to the
large capitalization U.S. equity market
with lower volatility and downside risks
than traditional equity indices, except
in environments of rapid appreciation
in the U.S. equity market over the
course of one year. On a specified day
of the applicable month for each Index
(‘‘Roll Date’’),10 the applicable Index
7 See Registration Statement on Form N–1A for
the Trust, dated October 24, 2017 (File Nos. 333–
179562 and 811–22668). According to the
Exchange, the Commission has not yet issued an
order granting exemptive relief to the Trust under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 applicable to
the activities of the Funds, but the Funds will not
be listed on the Exchange until such an order is
issued and any conditions contained therein are
satisfied.
8 As defined in Rule 14.11(c)(1)(D), the term ‘‘U.S.
Component Stock’’ means an equity security that is
registered under Sections 12(b) or 12(g) of the Act,
or an American Depositary receipt, the underlying
equity security of which is registered under
Sections 12(b) or 12(g) of the Act.
9 Additional information about the Indexes and
methodology is available on the Index Provider’s
website at www.cboe.com.
10 Each of the twelve Indexes is designed to
provide returns over a defined year long period and,
thus, there is an Index associated with each month.
As such, the Roll Date for a specific Index is
dependent on the monthly series for which the
Index is associated. For example, the Roll Date for
the Cboe® S&P 500® Buffer Protect Index January
Series is in January, and the Roll date for the Cboe®
S&P 500® Buffer Protect Index February Series is in
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
Continued
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11269-11273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82827; File No. SR-PEARL-2018-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 402, Criteria for Underlying Securities
March 8, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on February 22, 2018, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX
PEARL'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change'') a proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Exchange Rule 402,
Criteria for Underlying Securities, to modify the criteria for listing
an option on an underlying covered security.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl at MIAX
PEARL's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 402, Criteria for
Underlying Securities, to modify the criteria for listing options on an
underlying security as defined in Section 18(b)(1)(A) of the Securities
Act of 1933 (hereinafter ``covered security'' or ``covered
securities''). This is a competitive filing that is based on a proposal
recently submitted by Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Nasdaq Phlx'') and approved by
the Commission.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82474 (January 9,
2018), 83 FR 2240 (January 16, 2018) (Order Approving SR-Phlx-2017-
75).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange proposes to modify Rule 402(b)(5)(i) to
permit the listing of an option on an underlying covered security that
has a market price of at least $3.00 per share for the previous three
(3) consecutive business days preceding the date on which the Exchange
submits a certificate to the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') for
listing and trading. The Exchange does not intend to amend any other
criteria for listing options on an underlying security in Rule 402.
Currently the underlying covered security must have a closing
market
[[Page 11270]]
price of $3.00 per share for the previous five (5) consecutive business
days preceding the date on which the Exchange submits a listing
certificate to OCC. In the proposed amendment, the market price will
still be measured by the closing price reported in the primary market
in which the underlying covered security is traded, but the measurement
will be the price over the prior three (3) consecutive business day
period preceding the submission of the listing certificate to OCC,
instead of the prior five (5) business day period.
The Exchange acknowledges that the Options Listing Procedures Plan
\4\ requires that the listing certificate be provided to OCC no earlier
than 12:01 a.m. and no later than 11:00 a.m. (Chicago time) on the
trading day prior to the day on which trading is to begin.\5\ The
proposed amendment will still comport with that requirement. For
example, if an initial public offering (``IPO'') occurs at 11:00 a.m.
on Monday, the earliest date the Exchange could submit its listing
certificate to OCC would be on Thursday by 12:01 a.m. (Chicago time),
with the market price determined by the closing price over the three-
day period from Monday through Wednesday. The option on the IPO would
then be eligible for trading on the Exchange on Friday. The proposed
amendment would essentially enable options trading within four (4)
business days of an IPO becoming available instead of six (6) business
days (five (5) consecutive days plus the day the listing certificate is
submitted to OCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Plan for the Purpose of Developing and Implementing
Procedures Designed to Facilitate the Listing and Trading of
Standardized Options Submitted Pursuant to Section 11a(2)(3)(B) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a/k/a the Options Listing
Procedures Plan (``OLPP'')) is a national market system plan that,
among other things, sets forth procedures governing the listing of
new options series. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44521
(July 6, 2001), 66 FR 36809 (July 13, 2001) (Order approving OLPP).
The sponsors of OLPP include OCC; BATS Exchange, Inc.; BOX Options
Exchange LLC; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC; MIAX PEARL, LLC; The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Nasdaq GEMX,
LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; NYSE American, LLC; and NYSE
Arca, Inc.
\5\ See OLPP at page 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's initial listing standards for equity options in Rule
402 (including the current price/time standard of $3.00 per share for
five (5) consecutive business days) are substantially similar to the
initial listing standards adopted by other options exchanges.\6\ At the
time the Exchange received its initial approval from the Commission, as
part of its Rules, the Exchange adopted the ``look back'' period of
five (5) consecutive business days, it determined that the five-day
period was sufficient to protect against attempts to manipulate the
market price of the underlying security and would provide a reliable
test for stability.\7\ Surveillance technologies and procedures
concerning manipulation have evolved since then to provide adequate
prevention or detection of rule or securities law violations within the
proposed time frame, and the Exchange represents that its existing
trading surveillances are adequate to monitor the trading of options on
the Exchange.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Phlx Rule 1009, Commentary .01; see also BOX Rule
5020(b)(5).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79543 (December 13,
2016), 81 FR 92901 (December 20, 2016) (order granting approval of
MIAX PEARL for registration as a National Securities Exchange).
\8\ Such surveillance procedures generally focus on detecting
securities trading subject to opening price manipulation, closing
price manipulation, layering, spoofing or other unlawful activity
impacting an underlying security, the option, or both. The Exchange,
through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''), has
price movement alerts, unusual market activity and order book alerts
active for all trading symbols. These real time patterns are active
for the new security as soon as the IPO begins trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the scope of its surveillance
program also includes cross market surveillance for trading that is not
just limited to the Exchange. In particular, the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''), pursuant to a regulatory services
agreement, operates a range of cross-market equity surveillance
patterns on behalf of the Exchange to look for potential manipulative
behavior, including spoofing, algorithm gaming, marking the close and
open, and momentum ignition strategies, as well as more general,
abusive behavior related to front running, wash shales, quoting/
routing, and Reg SHO violations. These cross-market patterns
incorporate relevant data from various markets beyond the Exchange and
its affiliate, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX
Options''), including data from the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'')
and from the Nasdaq Stock Market (``Nasdaq'').
Additionally, for options, MIAX PEARL, through FINRA, utilizes an
array of patterns that monitor manipulation of options, or manipulation
of equity securities (regardless of venue) for the purpose of impacting
options prices on both MIAX Options and MIAX PEARL options markets
(i.e., mini-manipulation strategies). Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the cross market surveillance performed by FINRA on
behalf of the Exchange, coupled with the Exchange staff's real-time
monitoring of similarly violative activity on MIAX PEARL and its
affiliated market as described herein, reflects a comprehensive
surveillance program that is adequate to monitor for manipulation of
the underlying security and overlying option within the proposed three-
day look back period.
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the proposed listing criteria
would still require that the underlying security be listed on NYSE, the
American Stock Exchange (now known as NYSE American), or the National
Market System of The Nasdaq Stock Market (now known as the Nasdaq
Global Market) (collectively, the ``Named Markets''), as provided for
in the definition of ``covered security'' from Section 18(b)(1)(A) of
the 1933 Act.\9\ Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would still ensure that the underlying security meets the
high listing standards of a Named Market, and would also ensure that
the underlying is covered by the regulatory protections (including
market surveillance, investigation and enforcement) offered by these
exchanges for trading in covered securities conducted on their
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Nasdaq, Nasdaq Phlx's affiliated listing market,
had no cases within the past five years where an IPO-related issue for
which it had pricing information qualified for the $3.00 price
requirement during the first three (3) days of trading and did not
qualify for the $3.00 price requirement during the first five (5)
days.\10\ In other words, none of these qualifying issues fell below
the $3.00 threshold within the first three (3) or five (5) days of
trading. As such, the Exchange believes that its existing surveillance
technologies and procedures, coupled with Nasdaq's findings related to
the IPO-related issues as described herein, adequately address
potential concerns regarding possible manipulation or price stability
within the proposed timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ There were over 750 IPO-related issues on Nasdaq within the
past five years. Out of all of the issues with pricing information,
there was only one issue that had a price below $3 during the first
five consecutive business days. The Exchange notes, however, that
Nasdaq allows for companies to list on the Nasdaq Capital Market at
$2.00 or $3.00 per share in some instances, which was the case for
this particular issue. See Nasdaq Rule 5500 Series for initial
listing standards on the Nasdaq Capital Market. See also supra note
3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that the proposed look back period can
be implemented in connection with the other initial listing criteria
for underlying covered securities. In
[[Page 11271]]
particular, the Exchange recognizes that it may be difficult to verify
the number of shareholders in the days immediately following an IPO due
to the fact that stock trades generally clear within two business days
(T+2) of their trade date and therefore the shareholder count will
generally not be known until T+2.\11\ The Exchange notes that the
current T+2 settlement cycle was recently reduced from T+3 on September
5, 2017 in connection with the Commission's amendments to Exchange Rule
15c6-1(a) to adopt the shortened settlement cycle,\12\ and the look
back period of three (3) consecutive business days proposed herein
reflects this shortened T+2 settlement period. As proposed, stock
trades would clear within T+2 of their trade date (i.e., within three
(3) business days) and therefore the number of shareholders could be
verified within three (3) business days, thereby enabling options
trading within four (4) business days of an IPO (three (3) consecutive
business days plus the day the listing certificate is submitted to
OCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The number of shareholders of record can be validated by
large clearing agencies such as The Depository Trust and Clearing
Corporation (``DTCC'') upon the settlement date (i.e., T+2).
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78962 (September
28, 2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5, 2016) (Amendment to Securities
Transaction Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7-22-16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that it can verify the shareholder
count with various brokerage firms that have a large retail customer
clientele. Such firms can confirm the number of individual customers
who have a position in the new issue. The earliest that these firms can
provide confirmation is usually the day after the first day of trading
(T+1) on an unsettled basis, while others can confirm on the third day
of trading (T+2). The Exchange has confirmed with some of these
brokerage firms who provide shareholder numbers to the Exchange that
they are T+2 after an IPO. For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange
believes that basing the proposed three (3) business day look back
period on the T+2 settlement cycle would allow for sufficient
verification of the number of shareholders.
The proposed rule change will apply to all covered securities that
meet the criteria of Rule 402. Pursuant to Rule 402, the Exchange
establishes guidelines to be considered in evaluating the potential
underlying securities for Exchange option transactions.\13\ However,
the fact that a particular security may meet the guidelines established
by the Exchange does not necessarily mean that it will be approved as
an underlying security.\14\ As part of the established criteria, the
issuer must be in compliance with any applicable requirement of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.\15\ Additionally, in considering the
underlying security, the Exchange relies on information made publicly
available by the issuer and/or the markets in which the security is
traded.\16\ Even if the proposed option meets the objective criteria,
the Exchange may decide not to list, or place limitations or conditions
upon listing.\17\ The Exchange believes that these measures, together
with its existing surveillance procedures, provide adequate safeguards
in the review of any covered security that may meet the proposed
criteria for consideration of the option within the timeframe contained
in this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Exchange Rule 402(b). The Exchange established specific
criteria to be considered in evaluating potential underlying
securities for Exchange Option Transactions.
\14\ Id.
\15\ See Exchange Rule 402(b)(3).
\16\ See Exchange Rule 402(d).
\17\ See Exchange Rule 402(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that this filing is substantially similar to a
companion MIAX Options filing, modifying the criteria for listing an
option on an underlying covered security on its exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
MIAX PEARL believes that its proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \18\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \19\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to its listing
standards for covered securities would allow the Exchange to more
quickly list options on a qualifying covered security that has met the
$3.00 eligibility price without sacrificing investor protection. As
discussed above, the Exchange believes that its existing trading
surveillances provide a sufficient measure of protection against
potential price manipulation within the proposed three (3) consecutive
business day timeframe. The Exchange also believes that the proposed
three (3) consecutive business day timeframe would continue to be a
reliable test for price stability in light of Nasdaq's findings that
none of the IPO-related issues on Nasdaq within the past five years
that qualified for the $3.00 per share price standard during the first
three trading days fell below the $3.00 threshold during the fourth or
fifth trading day. Furthermore, the established guidelines to be
considered by the Exchange in evaluating the potential underlying
securities for Exchange option transactions,\20\ together with existing
trading surveillances, provide adequate safeguards in the review of any
covered security that may meet the proposed criteria for consideration
of the option within the proposed timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See notes 13-17 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange believes that basing the proposed
timeframe on the T+2 settlement cycle adequately addresses the
potential difficulties in confirming the number of shareholders of the
underlying covered security. Having some of the largest brokerage firms
that provide these shareholder counts to the Exchange confirm that they
are able to provide these numbers within T+2 further demonstrates that
the 2,000 shareholder requirement can be sufficiently verified within
the proposed timeframe. For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposed amendments will remove and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
providing an avenue for investors to swiftly hedge their investment in
the stock in a shorter amount of time than what is currently in
place.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ This proposed rule change does not alter any obligations of
issuers or other investors of an IPO that may be subject to a lock-
up or other restrictions on trading related securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, it should be noted that a price/time standard for the
underlying security was first adopted when the listed options market
was in its infancy, and was intended to prevent the proliferation of
options being listed on low-priced securities that presented special
manipulation concerns and/or lacked liquidity needed to maintain fair
and orderly markets.\22\ When options trading commenced in 1973, the
Commission determined that it was necessary for securities underlying
options to meet certain minimum standards regarding both the quality of
the issuer and the quality of the market
[[Page 11272]]
for a particular security.\23\ These standards, including a price/time
standard, were imposed to ensure that those issuers upon whose
securities options were to be traded were widely-held, financially
sound companies whose shares had trading volume and float substantial
enough so as not to be readily susceptible to manipulation.\24\ At the
time, the Commission determined that the imposition of these standards
was reasonable in view of the pilot nature of options trading and the
limited experience of investors with options trading.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29628 (August 29,
1991), 56 FR 43949-01 (September 5, 1991) (SR-AMEX-86-21; SR-CBOE-
86-15; SR-NYSE-86-20; SR-PSE-86-15; and SR-PHLX-86-21) (``1991
Approval Order'') ay 43949 (discussing the Commission's concerns
when options trading initially commenced in 1973).
\23\ See 1991 Approval Order at 43949.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now more than 40 years later, the listed options market has evolved
into a mature market with sophisticated investors. In view of this
evolution, the Commission has approved various exchange proposals to
relax some of these initial listing standards throughout the years,\26\
including reducing the price/time standard in 2003 from $7.50 per share
for the majority of business days over a three month period to the
current $3.00 per share/five business day standard (``2003
Proposal'').\27\ It has been almost fifteen years since the Commission
approved the 2003 proposal, and both the listed options market and
exchange technologies have continued to evolve since then. In this
instance, MIAX PEARL is only proposing a modest reduction of the
current five (5) business day standard to three (3) business days to
correspond to the securities industry's move to a T+2 standard
settlement cycle.\28\ The $3.00 per share standard and all other
initial options listing criteria in Rule 402 will remain unchanged by
this proposal. For the reasons discussed herein, the Exchange therefore
believes that the proposed three (3) business day period will be
beneficial to the marketplace without sacrificing investor protections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See e.g., 1991 Approval Order (modifying a number of
initial listing criteria, including the reduction of the price/time
standard from $10 per share each day during the preceding three
calendar months to $7.50 per share for the majority of days during
the same period).
\27\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47190 (January 15,
2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22, 2003) (SR-CBOE-2002-62); 47352
(February 11, 2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR-PCX-2003-
06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352 (March 19, 2003) (SR-ISE-
2003-04); 47613 (April 1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) (SR-
Amex-2003-19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076 (May 9, 2003)
(SR-Phlx-2003-27).
\28\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In this regard and as
indicated above, the Exchange notes that the rule change is being
proposed as a competitive response to a filing submitted by Nasdaq Phlx
that was recently approved by the Commission.\29\ The proposed rule
change will reduce the number of days to list options on an underlying
security, and is intended to bring new options listings to the
marketplace quicker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \30\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \32\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\33\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving
the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest as it will allow the Exchange to
modify the criteria for listing an option on an underlying covered
security to align with the criteria of other options exchanges, and the
Exchange's proposal does not raise new issues. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\33\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\34\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-PEARL-2018-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2018-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the
[[Page 11273]]
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
PEARL-2018-04, and should be submitted on or before April 4, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-05073 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P