Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Voluntary Protection Program Information, 10903-10904 [2018-05030]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Notices
and, as remedial measures, stopped
dispensing schedule II substances all
together.’’ Resp. Exceptions, at 8.
Respondent also argues that, through
Respondent’s Owner and PIC, it
‘‘accepted the responsibility for not
documenting in every instance, its
efforts in resolving the red flags and as
[a] remedial measure stated that it
‘document[s] everything that’s
possible.’ ’’ Id. It further contends that,
‘‘[a]lthough . . . [Respondent’s Owner
and PIC] accepted responsibility for the
misfiling of the prescriptions, it is easily
deuced [sic] from the record and from
the instituted corrective measures that
the Respondent accepted the
responsibility for the missing
information as well.’’ Id. at 18 n.19.
I reject Respondent’s contentions.
Most significantly, Respondent’s Owner
and PIC has entirely failed to
acknowledge that Respondent violated
the CSA when it knowingly dispensed
numerous controlled substance
prescriptions which were clearly issued
outside of the usual course of
professional practice and which lacked
a legitimate medical purpose. And even
as to the factual matters for which the
CALJ found she accepted responsibility,
such as failing to adequately document
her conversations with prescribers,
Respondent’s Owner and PIC
immediately equivocated by making
excuses for not doing so in the future.
She stated, ‘‘Now I document every
little thing that it’s concerned to the
conversation and the dispensing of
controlled substances. However, there’s
a lot of conversation going on on a daily
basis between doctors and offices.’’ Tr.
1010–11. Similarly, after acknowledging
that she filled controlled substance
prescriptions for patients who lived a
significant distance from the pharmacy,
Respondent’s Owner and PIC justified
her filling of the prescriptions, asserting,
without any evidence to corroborate her
claim, that ‘‘some of them are working
locally and they all had a local doctor.’’
Id. at 1026.
Respondent’s Owner and PIC also
testified that, ‘‘If the DEA provide me,
do not fill for 100 miles, like—that’s
why I said, I accepted my responsibility,
I took remedial measures. I do not fill
schedule II prescriptions in my
pharmacy because of these conflicting
red flags. Because it’s a practice of
Florida to travel.’’ Id. at 1023–24.
Respondent characterized this
testimony as meaning that Respondent’s
Owner and PIC accepted responsibility
for filling long-distance prescriptions.
Resp. Br., at 36; see also Resp.
Exceptions, at 8. I specifically reject
Respondent’s argument. Notably, this
testimony began with the word ‘‘if’’ and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
in any event, it does not constitute an
acceptance of responsibility for
violating the corresponding
responsibility rule. Further, the
testimony was not offered in the context
of addressing Respondent’s filling
prescriptions from its Florida customers
who travelled long distances to
patronize Respondent. Rather, the
testimony was offered to address
Respondent’s filling of prescriptions for
out-of-state customers, specifically
customers from Kentucky about whom
Respondent’s Owner and PIC testified
she had been ‘‘clearly instructed’’ by
DEA. Tr. 1023.
Notably, at no point in the hearing did
Respondent’s Owner and PIC accept
responsibility, let alone accept
responsibility unequivocally, for
violating the corresponding
responsibility regulation. Notably, the
testimony of Respondent’s Owner and
PIC manifests that she still does not
acknowledge the scope of a pharmacist’s
obligation under 21 CFR 1306.04(a). As
one example, she testified that ‘‘[t]he
prescription is an order for the
pharmacist to fill. For me not to fill that
prescription, I have to have a very good
reason not to fill it, because it’s an order
from the doctor to me to fill that
prescription for that patient.’’ Id. at
1168. As the Agency has previously
recognized, a registrant cannot accept
responsibility for its misconduct when
it does not even understand what the
law requires of it. Alexander, 82 FR at
49,729. I agree with the CALJ’s
conclusion that ‘‘there is no
unequivocal acceptance of
responsibility on this record that would
be particularly helpful to the
Respondent’s efforts to avoid a
sanction.’’ R.D., at 58.
Here, the CALJ concluded that ‘‘the
paltry nature of the Respondent’s
acceptance of responsibility would have
rendered remedial measure evidence
largely irrelevant.’’ Id. In addition,
Respondent’s misconduct included an
egregious abdication of the
corresponding responsibility
requirement involving the dispensing of
controlled substances such as Dilaudid
8 mg., a most potent and highly abused
schedule II drug; the evidence also
shows that Respondent committed
extensive violations of other Federal
and State legal requirements. Thus, due
to the Respondent’s ‘‘paltry’’ acceptance
of responsibility and its ‘‘intentional
decision to decline to notice evidence of
remedial steps’’ leading to the
preclusion of that evidence from
consideration, the CALJ recommended
that ‘‘the record supports the imposition
of a sanction.’’ Id. I find that this is the
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10903
appropriate result on the record in this
case.
I agree with the CALJ’s assessment
that, ‘‘[w]here no understanding is
acquired about how the regulated
conduct fell short of professional and
federal and state legal standards, it
would be difficult (even illogical) to
predict improvement.’’ Id. at 59. I also
agree with the CALJ’s prediction that
Respondent ‘‘is likely to proceed in the
future as it has in the past if not
curtailed in its ability to do so.’’ Id. I
further agree with the CALJ that the
‘‘sheer number of established
transgressions of various types, coupled
with the refusal to admit that issues
existed, would render a sanction less
than revocation as a message to the
regulated community that due diligence
is not a required condition precedent to
operating as a registrant.’’ Id.
Respondent has not rebutted the
Government’s prima facie showing that
its continued registration is
‘‘inconsistent with the public interest.’’
21 U.S.C. 823(f). I will therefore order
that Respondent’s registration be
revoked and that any pending
applications be denied.
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by 21 U.S.C. 824(a) and 21 U.S.C. 823(f),
as well as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that
DEA Certificate of Registration
FP1049546 issued to Pharmacy Doctors
Enterprises d/b/a Zion Clinic Pharmacy
be, and it hereby is, revoked. I further
order that any pending application of
Pharmacy Doctors Enterprises d/b/a
Zion Clinic Pharmacy for renewal or
modification of this registration be, and
it hereby is, denied. This order is
effective April 12, 2018.
Dated: February 28, 2018.
Robert W. Patterson,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–05020 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Voluntary
Protection Program Information
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) sponsored information
collection request (ICR) titled,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
10904
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Notices
‘‘Voluntary Protection Program
Information,’’ to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval for continued use,
without change, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are
invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
on or before April 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with
applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained free of charge from the
RegInfo.gov website at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201711-1218-002
or by contacting Michel Smyth by
telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202–
693–8064 (these are not toll-free
numbers) or by email at DOL_PRA_
PUBLIC@dol.gov.
Submit comments about this request
by mail to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for DOL–OSHA, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503; by Fax: 202–395–5806 (this is
not a toll-free number); or by email:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Commenters are encouraged, but not
required, to send a courtesy copy of any
comments by mail or courier to the U.S.
Department of Labor—OASAM, Office
of the Chief Information Officer, Attn:
Departmental Information Compliance
Management Program, Room N1301,
200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210; or by email:
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–
4129, TTY 202–693–8064 (these are not
toll-free numbers) or by email at DOL_
PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ICR
seeks to extend PRA authority for the
Voluntary Protection Program (VPP)
information collection. The VPP is a
partnership between labor,
management, and government designed
to recognize and promote excellence in
safety and health management. In order
to participate in the VPP, an applicant
submits an application and an annual
self-evaluation containing a detailed
description of its safety and health
management programs to the OSHA,
which uses the information to conduct
a preliminary analysis of the worksite’s
programs and to make a preliminary
determination regarding the worksite’s
qualifications for the VPP. Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
2(b)(1) authorizes this information
collection. See 29 U.S.C. 651(b)(1).
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless it is
approved by the OMB under the PRA
and displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information that does not
display a valid Control Number. See 5
CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL
obtains OMB approval for this
information collection under Control
Number 1218–0239.
OMB authorization for an ICR cannot
be for more than three (3) years without
renewal, and the DOL seeks to extend
PRA authorization for this information
collection for three (3) more years,
without any change to existing
requirements. For additional substantive
information about this ICR, see the
related notice published in the Federal
Register on August 30, 2017 (82 FR
41294).
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section within thirty (30) days of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. In order to help ensure
appropriate consideration, comments
should mention OMB Control Number
128–0239.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–OSHA.
Title of Collection: Voluntary
Protection Program Information.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB Control Number: 1218–0239.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
businesses or other for-profits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 3,468.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 3,808.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
90,863 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $0.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D).
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–05030 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Affirmative Decisions on Petitions for
Modification Granted in Whole or in
Part
Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and the Code of
Federal Regulations govern the
application, processing, and disposition
of petitions for modification. This
Federal Register notice notifies the
public that MSHA has investigated and
issued a final decision on certain mine
operator petitions to modify a safety
standard.
SUMMARY:
Copies of the final decisions
are posted on MSHA’s website at
https://www.msha.gov/regulations/
rulemaking/petitions-modification. The
public may inspect the petitions and
final decisions during normal business
hours in MSHA’s Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202. All visitors are required
to check in at the receptionist’s desk in
Suite 4E401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron at 202–693–9447
(Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Telefax).
[These are not toll-free numbers].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Introduction
Under section 101 of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, a mine
operator may petition and the Secretary
of Labor (Secretary) may modify the
application of a mandatory safety
standard to that mine if the Secretary
determines that: (1) An alternative
method exists that will guarantee no
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10903-10904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05030]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Voluntary Protection Program Information
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sponsored information
collection request (ICR) titled,
[[Page 10904]]
``Voluntary Protection Program Information,'' to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for continued use,
without change, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives
on or before April 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency
of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained free of charge
from the RegInfo.gov website at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201711-1218-002 or by contacting Michel Smyth by
telephone at 202-693-4129, TTY 202-693-8064 (these are not toll-free
numbers) or by email at [email protected].
Submit comments about this request by mail to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL-
OSHA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202-395-5806 (this is not a toll-free
number); or by email: [email protected]. Commenters are
encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments
by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor--OASAM, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Attn: Departmental Information
Compliance Management Program, Room N1301, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210; or by email: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michel Smyth by telephone at 202-693-
4129, TTY 202-693-8064 (these are not toll-free numbers) or by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ICR seeks to extend PRA authority for
the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) information collection. The VPP
is a partnership between labor, management, and government designed to
recognize and promote excellence in safety and health management. In
order to participate in the VPP, an applicant submits an application
and an annual self-evaluation containing a detailed description of its
safety and health management programs to the OSHA, which uses the
information to conduct a preliminary analysis of the worksite's
programs and to make a preliminary determination regarding the
worksite's qualifications for the VPP. Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970 section 2(b)(1) authorizes this information collection. See
29 U.S.C. 651(b)(1).
This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and
the public is generally not required to respond to an information
collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any
other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that
does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and
1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection
under Control Number 1218-0239.
OMB authorization for an ICR cannot be for more than three (3)
years without renewal, and the DOL seeks to extend PRA authorization
for this information collection for three (3) more years, without any
change to existing requirements. For additional substantive information
about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal
Register on August 30, 2017 (82 FR 41294).
Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in
the ADDRESSES section within thirty (30) days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should mention OMB Control Number 128-0239.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Agency: DOL-OSHA.
Title of Collection: Voluntary Protection Program Information.
OMB Control Number: 1218-0239.
Affected Public: Private Sector--businesses or other for-profits.
Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,468.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 3,808.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 90,863 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $0.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D).
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-05030 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P