Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 10935-10936 [2018-04964]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Notices
Exchange also proposed to list and trade
shares of Royce Pennsylvania ETF,
Royce Premier ETF, and Royce Total
Return ETF under proposed NYSE Arca
Rule 8.900–E. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on January 26, 2018.3
The Commission has received five
comment letters on the proposed rule
change.4
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is March 12, 2018.
The Commission is extending this 45day time period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change and the comment letters.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6
designates April 26, 2018, as the date by
which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File Number SR–NYSEArca–2018–04).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–04965 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82549
(January 19, 2018), 83 FR 3846.
4 See letters from: (1) Terence W. Norman,
Founder, Blue Tractor Group, LLC, dated February
6, 2018; (2) Simon P. Goulet, Co-Founder, Blue
Tractor Group, LLC, dated February 13, 2018; (3)
Todd J. Broms, Chief Executive Officer, Broms &
Company LLC, dated February 16, 2018; (4) Kevin
S. Haeberle, Associate Professor of Law, William &
Mary Law School, dated February 16, 2018; and (5)
Gary L. Gastineau, President, ETF Consultants.com,
Inc., dated March 6, 2018. The comment letters are
available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/srnysearca-2018-04/nysearca201804.htm.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
6 Id.
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82823; File No. SR–MIAX–
2018–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
March 7, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on March 1, 2018, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule
(the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings, at MIAX’s principal office, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to introduce a cap on the
amount of Member Participant Identifier
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10935
(‘‘MPID’’) 3 fees that are assessed by the
Exchange on an Electronic Exchange
Member (‘‘EEM’’) 4 per month. The
Exchange is not proposing any new fees;
the Exchange is simply proposing to
introduce a monthly cap on certain
existing fees.
The amount of MPID fees assessed by
the Exchange on a particular EEM in a
particular month is based on the
number of MPIDs assigned to the
particular EEM in the System 5 in a
given month, for each month the
Member 6 is credentialed to use such
MPID in the production environment.7
EEMs request MPID assignments from
the Exchange. EEMs are assessed a
monthly MPID fee of $200.00 for the
first MPID assigned, $100.00 each for
the second through fifth MPID assigned,
and $50.00 each for the sixth MPID and
any additional MPIDs assigned. The
Exchange assesses MPID fees in order to
cover the administrative costs it incurs
in assigning and managing these
identifiers for each EEM.
The Exchange now proposes to cap
MPID fees at $1,000.00 per month per
EEM, regardless the actual number of
MPIDs assigned to such EEM. As a
practical matter, using the current fee
table in Section 5e) of the Fee Schedule,
the 14th MPID assigned to an EEM and
each MPID thereafter would not incur
an additional MPID fee, as the EEM
would reach the cap of $1,000.00 after
assignment of the 13th MPID for that
month.
The Exchange believes that
establishing a monthly cap on MPID
fees will give Members greater
flexibility to accommodate their varying
business models and customer
configurations, as many Members often
request multiple MPIDs from the
Exchange, and the Exchange does not
want MPID costs to serve as a barrier for
requesting multiple MPIDs. The
Exchange notes that several other
3 An MPID is a code used in the MIAX Options
system to identify the participant to MIAX Options
and to the participant’s Clearing Member respecting
trades executed on MIAX Options. Participants may
use more than one MPID.
4 The term ‘‘Electronic Exchange Member’’ or
‘‘EEM’’ means the holder of a Trading Permit who
is a Member representing as agent Public Customer
Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange
and those non-Market Maker Members conducting
proprietary trading. See Exchange Rule 100.
5 The term ‘‘System’’ means the automated
trading system used by the Exchange for the trading
of securities. See Exchange Rule 100.
6 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68645
(January 14, 2013), 78 FR 4175 (January 18, 2013)
(SR–MIAX–2012–05).
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
10936
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 / Notices
exchanges offer fee caps on certain nontransaction fees as well.8
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is
consistent with Section 6(b) 9 of the Act
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) 10 of the Act, in that it is
designed to provide for an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among Exchange Members
and issuers and other persons using its
facilities, because it applies equally to
all Members and any persons using the
facilities or services of the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposal furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) 11 of the Act in
particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and it is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination among
customers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed amendment to establish a fee
cap on MPID fees is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory. The proposal to cap the
total amount of MPID fees that can be
assessed upon an EEM to a maximum of
$1,000.00 per month is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade by encouraging Members to
configure their MPID assignments with
greater granularity and for MPID costs to
not serve as a barrier for requesting
multiple MPIDs. Because any EEM is
eligible to take advantage of the fee cap,
the Exchange believes the fee cap is fair
and equitable and not unreasonably
discriminatory because it applies
equally to all Members, and access to
such fee cap is offered on terms that are
not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
8 See the Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule,
Section VI(D), Remote Specialist Fee (fee cap of
$4,500 per month). See also the Nasdaq ISE, LLC
Schedule of Fees, Section V(D), INET Port Fees (fee
cap of $4,000 per month for OTTO Port Fee).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
17:47 Mar 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,12 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 13 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would promote
transparency by providing Members
with more flexibility to configure their
MPIDs with greater granularity by
offering a reasonably designed fee
structure and fee cap. Additionally,
respecting intra-market competition, the
fee cap on MPID assignments is
available to all Members, thus providing
all Members with an even playing field
with respect to amount of fees that can
be assessed by the Exchange for MPID
assignments. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its
fees and fee waivers to remain
competitive with other exchanges and to
attract order flow to the Exchange.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
12 15
13 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2018–09 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–09. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2018–09 and should
be submitted on or before April 3, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–04964 Filed 3–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
14 17
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10935-10936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04964]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82823; File No. SR-MIAX-2018-09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
March 7, 2018.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on March 1, 2018, Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC (``MIAX Options'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings, at MIAX's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to introduce a cap
on the amount of Member Participant Identifier (``MPID'') \3\ fees that
are assessed by the Exchange on an Electronic Exchange Member (``EEM'')
\4\ per month. The Exchange is not proposing any new fees; the Exchange
is simply proposing to introduce a monthly cap on certain existing
fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ An MPID is a code used in the MIAX Options system to
identify the participant to MIAX Options and to the participant's
Clearing Member respecting trades executed on MIAX Options.
Participants may use more than one MPID.
\4\ The term ``Electronic Exchange Member'' or ``EEM'' means the
holder of a Trading Permit who is a Member representing as agent
Public Customer Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange and
those non-Market Maker Members conducting proprietary trading. See
Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amount of MPID fees assessed by the Exchange on a particular
EEM in a particular month is based on the number of MPIDs assigned to
the particular EEM in the System \5\ in a given month, for each month
the Member \6\ is credentialed to use such MPID in the production
environment.\7\ EEMs request MPID assignments from the Exchange. EEMs
are assessed a monthly MPID fee of $200.00 for the first MPID assigned,
$100.00 each for the second through fifth MPID assigned, and $50.00
each for the sixth MPID and any additional MPIDs assigned. The Exchange
assesses MPID fees in order to cover the administrative costs it incurs
in assigning and managing these identifiers for each EEM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
\6\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68645 (January 14,
2013), 78 FR 4175 (January 18, 2013) (SR-MIAX-2012-05).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to cap MPID fees at $1,000.00 per month
per EEM, regardless the actual number of MPIDs assigned to such EEM. As
a practical matter, using the current fee table in Section 5e) of the
Fee Schedule, the 14th MPID assigned to an EEM and each MPID thereafter
would not incur an additional MPID fee, as the EEM would reach the cap
of $1,000.00 after assignment of the 13th MPID for that month.
The Exchange believes that establishing a monthly cap on MPID fees
will give Members greater flexibility to accommodate their varying
business models and customer configurations, as many Members often
request multiple MPIDs from the Exchange, and the Exchange does not
want MPID costs to serve as a barrier for requesting multiple MPIDs.
The Exchange notes that several other
[[Page 10936]]
exchanges offer fee caps on certain non-transaction fees as well.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See the Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule, Section VI(D),
Remote Specialist Fee (fee cap of $4,500 per month). See also the
Nasdaq ISE, LLC Schedule of Fees, Section V(D), INET Port Fees (fee
cap of $4,000 per month for OTTO Port Fee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) \9\ of the Act in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \10\ of the Act, in that it is
designed to provide for an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among Exchange Members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities, because it applies equally to all Members
and any persons using the facilities or services of the Exchange. The
Exchange also believes that the proposal furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ of the Act in particular, in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and it is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to establish a
fee cap on MPID fees is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory. The proposal to cap the total amount of MPID fees that
can be assessed upon an EEM to a maximum of $1,000.00 per month is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade by
encouraging Members to configure their MPID assignments with greater
granularity and for MPID costs to not serve as a barrier for requesting
multiple MPIDs. Because any EEM is eligible to take advantage of the
fee cap, the Exchange believes the fee cap is fair and equitable and
not unreasonably discriminatory because it applies equally to all
Members, and access to such fee cap is offered on terms that are not
unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would promote transparency by providing Members
with more flexibility to configure their MPIDs with greater granularity
by offering a reasonably designed fee structure and fee cap.
Additionally, respecting intra-market competition, the fee cap on MPID
assignments is available to all Members, thus providing all Members
with an even playing field with respect to amount of fees that can be
assessed by the Exchange for MPID assignments. The Exchange notes that
it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees and fee waivers to remain competitive
with other exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \13\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2018-09 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2018-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2018-09 and should be submitted on
or before April 3, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-04964 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P