Certain Wi-Fi Enabled Electronic Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Allegations in the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 10522-10523 [2018-04794]

Download as PDF 10522 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2018 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1066] Certain Recombinant Factor IX Products Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion for Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (Order No. 19) granting an unopposed motion for termination of the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3438. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 14, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Bioverativ Inc. of Waltham, Massachusetts; Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc. of Waltham, Massachusetts; and Bioverativ U.S. LLC of Waltham, Massachusetts (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 82 FR 37898 (Aug. 14, 2017). The complaint alleges section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain recombinant Factor IX products by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,670,475; 9,623,091; and 9,629,903. Id. The notice of investigation named as respondents CSL amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Mar 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 Behring LLC of Prussia, Pennsylvania; CSL Behring GmbH, Emil-von-BehringStrasse of Marburg, Germany; and CSL Behring Recombinant Facility AG, Wankdorfstrasse of Bern, Switzerland (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) also was named as a party in the investigation. On February 6, 2018, Complainants filed a motion to terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. On February 8, 2018, Respondents filed a response, taking no position on the motion. On February 12, 2018, OUII filed a response supporting the motion. On February 15, 2018, the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 19), granting the motion. The ALJ found that the motion complied with section 210.21(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)), that there was no evidence of extraordinary circumstances preventing termination of the investigation, and that termination is in the public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 6, 2018. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–04773 Filed 3–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1072] Certain Wi-Fi Enabled Electronic Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Allegations in the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) of the presiding SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), terminating the above-captioned investigation based on withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint. The Commission has also determined to terminate the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on October 3, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Sharp Corporation of Osaka, Japan and Sharp Electronics Corporation of Montvale, New Jersey. 82 FR 46088–89. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain Wi-Fi enabled electronic devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,325,838 and 8,279,809. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Hisense Co., Ltd. and Hisense Electric, Co. Ltd., both of Qingdao, China; Hisense International (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong; Hisense USA Corporation, Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation, and Hisense USA Multimedia R&D Center, Inc., all of Suwanee, Georgia; and Hisense Inc. of Huntington Beach, California. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is participating in the investigation. On December 22, 2017, complainants filed an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation based on a withdrawal E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2018 / Notices of the allegations in the complaint. In the motion, the complainant states that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation. Respondents and OUII filed responses in support of the motion. The ALJ issued the subject ID on February 5, 2018, granting the unopposed motion for termination. He found that the motion satisfied Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and that there are no extraordinary circumstances that warrant denying the motion. No party petitioned for review of the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID and has terminated the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (‘‘Assistant Administrator’’) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on March 31, 2017, Research Triangle Institute, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Hermann Building, Room 106, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709–2194 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: By order of the Commission. Issued: March 6, 2018. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The company will manufacture marihuana (7360) and tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) for use by their researchers under the above-listed controlled substances as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) for clinical trials. In reference to drug code (7370) the company plans to bulk manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol. No other activities for this drug code are authorized for this registration. [FR Doc. 2018–04794 Filed 3–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–392] Marihuana ..................... Tetrahydrocannabinols Drug code 7360 7370 I I [FR Doc. 2018–04766 Filed 3–8–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P Notice of application. Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before May 8, 2018. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. DATES: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Mar 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA–2006–0028] MET Laboratories, Inc.: Grant of Expansion of Recognition Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In this notice, OSHA announces its final decision to expand the scope of recognition for MET Laboratories, Inc., as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on March 9, 2018. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is available from the following sources: Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of Communications, phone: (202) 693– 1999; email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov. General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson, Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, phone: (202) 693–2110; email: robinson.kevin@dol.gov. OSHA’s web page includes information about the NRTL Program (see http:// www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/ index.html). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Schedule Dated: March 5, 2018. Susan A. Gibson, Deputy Assistant Administrator. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Research Triangle Institute ACTION: Controlled substance 10523 I. Notice of Final Decision OSHA hereby gives notice of the expansion of the scope of recognition of MET Laboratories, Inc. (MET), as a NRTL. MET’s expansion covers the addition of four test standards to its scope of recognition. OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets the requirements specified by 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety testing and certification of the specific products covered within its scope of recognition and is not a delegation or grant of government authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require testing and certification of the products. The Agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial recognition, or for expansion or renewal of this recognition, following requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires that the Agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the application and provides its preliminary finding and, in the second notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application. These notices set forth the NRTL’s scope of recognition or modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages are available from the Agency’s website at http:// www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/ index.html. MET submitted four applications, one dated July 7, 2015 (OSHA–2006–0028– 0037), two dated December 14, 2016 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10522-10523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1072]


Certain Wi-Fi Enabled Electronic Devices and Components Thereof; 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Allegations in 
the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 6) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ''), terminating the above-captioned investigation based on 
withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint. The Commission has also 
determined to terminate the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on October 3, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Sharp 
Corporation of Osaka, Japan and Sharp Electronics Corporation of 
Montvale, New Jersey. 82 FR 46088-89. The complaint, as supplemented, 
alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain Wi-Fi enabled electronic devices and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 
8,325,838 and 8,279,809. The complaint further alleges that a domestic 
industry exists. The Commission's notice of investigation named as 
respondents Hisense Co., Ltd. and Hisense Electric, Co. Ltd., both of 
Qingdao, China; Hisense International (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. of Sheung 
Wan, Hong Kong; Hisense USA Corporation, Hisense Electronics 
Manufacturing Company of America Corporation, and Hisense USA 
Multimedia R&D Center, Inc., all of Suwanee, Georgia; and Hisense Inc. 
of Huntington Beach, California. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') is participating in the investigation.
    On December 22, 2017, complainants filed an unopposed motion to 
terminate the investigation based on a withdrawal

[[Page 10523]]

of the allegations in the complaint. In the motion, the complainant 
states that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or 
implied between the parties concerning the subject matter of the 
investigation. Respondents and OUII filed responses in support of the 
motion.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID on February 5, 2018, granting the 
unopposed motion for termination. He found that the motion satisfied 
Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and that there are 
no extraordinary circumstances that warrant denying the motion. No 
party petitioned for review of the subject ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID and has 
terminated the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 6, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-04794 Filed 3-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P