Certain Recombinant Factor IX Products Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion for Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 10522 [2018-04773]
Download as PDF
10522
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2018 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1066]
Certain Recombinant Factor IX
Products Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting an Unopposed Motion for
Termination of the Investigation Based
on Withdrawal of the Complaint;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (Order
No. 19) granting an unopposed motion
for termination of the investigation
based on withdrawal of the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3438. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on August 14, 2017, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Bioverativ
Inc. of Waltham, Massachusetts;
Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc. of
Waltham, Massachusetts; and Bioverativ
U.S. LLC of Waltham, Massachusetts
(collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 82 FR
37898 (Aug. 14, 2017). The complaint
alleges section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain recombinant Factor IX products
by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent
Nos. 9,670,475; 9,623,091; and
9,629,903. Id. The notice of
investigation named as respondents CSL
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Behring LLC of Prussia, Pennsylvania;
CSL Behring GmbH, Emil-von-BehringStrasse of Marburg, Germany; and CSL
Behring Recombinant Facility AG,
Wankdorfstrasse of Bern, Switzerland
(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). Id. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
(‘‘OUII’’) also was named as a party in
the investigation. On February 6, 2018,
Complainants filed a motion to
terminate the investigation based on
withdrawal of the complaint. On
February 8, 2018, Respondents filed a
response, taking no position on the
motion. On February 12, 2018, OUII
filed a response supporting the motion.
On February 15, 2018, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order
No. 19), granting the motion. The ALJ
found that the motion complied with
section 210.21(a)(1) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.21(a)(1)), that there was no evidence
of extraordinary circumstances
preventing termination of the
investigation, and that termination is in
the public interest. No petitions for
review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 6, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–04773 Filed 3–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1072]
Certain Wi-Fi Enabled Electronic
Devices and Components Thereof;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation Based
on Withdrawal of the Allegations in the
Complaint; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 6) of the presiding
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
terminating the above-captioned
investigation based on withdrawal of
the allegations in the complaint. The
Commission has also determined to
terminate the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on October 3, 2017, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Sharp
Corporation of Osaka, Japan and Sharp
Electronics Corporation of Montvale,
New Jersey. 82 FR 46088–89. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, based upon the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain Wi-Fi enabled electronic devices
and components thereof by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
8,325,838 and 8,279,809. The complaint
further alleges that a domestic industry
exists. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Hisense Co., Ltd. and Hisense Electric,
Co. Ltd., both of Qingdao, China;
Hisense International (Hong Kong) Co.
Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong;
Hisense USA Corporation, Hisense
Electronics Manufacturing Company of
America Corporation, and Hisense USA
Multimedia R&D Center, Inc., all of
Suwanee, Georgia; and Hisense Inc. of
Huntington Beach, California. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
(‘‘OUII’’) is participating in the
investigation.
On December 22, 2017, complainants
filed an unopposed motion to terminate
the investigation based on a withdrawal
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 10522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04773]
[[Page 10522]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1066]
Certain Recombinant Factor IX Products Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion for
Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (Order
No. 19) granting an unopposed motion for termination of the
investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3438. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on August 14, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Bioverativ
Inc. of Waltham, Massachusetts; Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc. of
Waltham, Massachusetts; and Bioverativ U.S. LLC of Waltham,
Massachusetts (collectively, ``Complainants''). 82 FR 37898 (Aug. 14,
2017). The complaint alleges section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain recombinant Factor IX products by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,670,475; 9,623,091; and 9,629,903.
Id. The notice of investigation named as respondents CSL Behring LLC of
Prussia, Pennsylvania; CSL Behring GmbH, Emil-von-Behring-Strasse of
Marburg, Germany; and CSL Behring Recombinant Facility AG,
Wankdorfstrasse of Bern, Switzerland (collectively, ``Respondents'').
Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') also was
named as a party in the investigation. On February 6, 2018,
Complainants filed a motion to terminate the investigation based on
withdrawal of the complaint. On February 8, 2018, Respondents filed a
response, taking no position on the motion. On February 12, 2018, OUII
filed a response supporting the motion. On February 15, 2018, the
presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 19), granting the motion. The ALJ
found that the motion complied with section 210.21(a)(1) of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)),
that there was no evidence of extraordinary circumstances preventing
termination of the investigation, and that termination is in the public
interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 6, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-04773 Filed 3-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P