Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination To Affirm a Domestic Industry Finding Under Modified Reasoning; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order; Issuance of Sixteen Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation, 8709-8710 [2018-04026]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1028]
Certain Mobile Device Holders and
Components Thereof; Commission’s
Determination To Affirm a Domestic
Industry Finding Under Modified
Reasoning; Issuance of a General
Exclusion Order; Issuance of Sixteen
Cease and Desist Orders; Termination
of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm
under modified reasoning the ALJ’s
finding on the economic prong of the
domestic industry. The Commission has
also determined to issue a general
exclusion order directed against
infringing mobile device holders and
components thereof, and has issued
sixteen cease and desist orders against
various defaulting respondents. The
investigation is hereby terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 14, 2016, based on a
complaint and supplements, filed on
behalf of Nite Ize, Inc. of Boulder,
Colorado (‘‘Nite Ize’’). 81 FR 79519–20
(Nov. 14, 2016). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain mobile device holders and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Feb 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,602,376 (‘‘the ’376 patent’’),
U.S. Patent No. 8,870,146 (‘‘the ’146
patent’’), U.S. Patent No. D734,746 (‘‘the
’746 patent’’), and U.S. Patent No.
D719,959 (‘‘the ’959 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named the following
respondents: REXS, LLC (‘‘REXS LLC’’)
of Lewes, Delaware; Spinido, Inc. of
Brighton, Colorado; Guangzhou
Kuaguoyi E-commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a
Kagu Culture (‘‘Kagu Culture’’) of
Baiyum, China; Sunpauto Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Sunpauto’’) of Kowloon, Hong Kong;
Shenzhen Topworld Technology Co.
d/b/a IdeaPro (‘‘IdeaPro’’) of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong; Ninghuaxian Wangfulong
Chaojishichang Youxian Gongsi, Ltd.,
d/b/a EasybuyUS of Shanghai, China;
Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly of Duluth,
Georgia; Trendbox USA LLC d/b/a
Trendbox (‘‘Trendbox’’) of Scottsdale,
Arizona; Tenswall d/b/a Shenzhen
Tenswall International Trading Co.
(‘‘Tenswall’’) of La Puente, California;
Luo Jieqiong d/b/a Wekin (‘‘Wekin’’) of
Chang Sha, China; Pecham d/b/a
Baichen Technology Ltd. (‘‘Pecham’’) of
Wan Chai, Hong Kong; Cyrift d/b/a
Guangzhou Sunway E-Commerce LLC of
Guangzhou, China; Rymemo d/b/a
Global Box, LLC of Dunbar,
Pennsylvania; Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix of
Hubei, China; Zhongshan Feiyu
Hardware Technology Co., Ltd d/b/a
YouFo (‘‘YouFo’’) of ZhongShan City,
China; and Shenzhen Youtai Trade
Company Limited, d/b/a NoChoice; Luo,
Qiben, d/b/a Lita International Shop of
Nanshan; Shenzhen New Dream
Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Newdreams
(‘‘Newdreams’’); Shenznen Gold South
Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baidatong;
Wang Zhi Gang d/b/a IceFox (‘‘Icefox’’);
Dang Yuya d/b/a Sminiker; Lin Zhen
Mei d/b/a Anson (‘‘Anson’’); Wu Xuying
d/b/a Novoland (‘‘Novoland’’);
Shenzhen New Dream Sailing Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream;
Tontek d/b/a Shenzhen Hetongtai
Electronics Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tontek’’); Scotabc
d/b/a ShenChuang Optoelectronics
Technology Co., Ltd.(‘‘Scotabc’’);
Zhiping Zhou d/b/a Runshion
(‘‘Runshion’’); Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen
Hui Ju Kang Technology Co. Ltd.;
Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen Senweite
Electronic Commerce Ltd.; Oumeiou
d/b/a Shenzhen Oumeiou Technology
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Oumeiou’’); Grando d/b/a
Shenzhen Dashentai Network
Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen
Yingxue Technology Co., Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8709
(‘‘Shenzhen Yingxue’’); Shenzhen
Longwang Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a
LWANG (‘‘LWANG’’); Hu Peng d/b/a
AtomBud; and Wang Guoxiang d/b/a
Minse (‘‘Minse’’) all of Shenzhen,
China. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was named as a
party to the investigation.
Rymemo d/b/a Global Box, LLC and
Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly were
terminated on the basis of a consent
order. Commission Notice (March 21,
2017); Commission Notice (May 15,
2017). Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen
Senweite Electronic Commerce Ltd.,
Shenzhen Youtai Trade Company
Limited, d/b/a NoChoice, Ninghuaxian
Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian
Gongsi, Ltd., d/b/a EasybuyUS,
Shenzhen Gold South Technology Co.,
Ltd. d/b/a Baidatong, Cyrift d/b/a
Guangzhou Sunway E-Commerce LLC,
Hu Peng d/b/a AtomBud, Grando d/b/a
Shenzhen Dashentai Network
Technology Co., Ltd., Huijukon d/b/a
Shenzhen Hui Ju Kang Technology Co.
Ltd., Luo, Qiben, d/b/a Lita
International Shop, Shenzhen New
Dream Sailing Electronic Technology
Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream, Spinido
Inc., Dang Yuya d/b/a Sminiker, and
Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix were terminated
because service could not be effected.
Commission Notice (June 13, 2017). The
remaining respondents were previously
found in default (collectively, ‘‘the
Defaulting Respondents’’). Commission
Notice (May 26, 2017). In addition, the
’746 and ’959 patents were previously
terminated from the investigation.
Commission Notice (July 28, 2017).
On May 18, 2017, Nite Ize filed a
Motion for Summary Determination of
Violation by the Defaulting Respondents
and for a Recommended Determination
on Remedy and Bonding, Including
Issuance of a General Exclusion Order,
Limited Exclusion Orders (in the
alternative), and Cease and Desist
Orders. On June 16, 2017, the ALJ
issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 14) granting in-part Nite Ize’s
motion for summary determination. The
Commission determined not to review
that ID. Commission Notice (July 14,
2017).
On September 12, 2017, the ALJ
issued his final initial determination
(‘‘FID’’) finding a violation of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337. On the same day, the ALJ issued
his Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding. No petitions for
review of the FID were filed.
On November 13, 2017, the
Commission determined to review the
FID’s findings on the economic prong of
domestic industry and requested
briefing on remedy, bonding, and the
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
8710
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Notices
public interest. 82 FR 54413–14 (Nov.
17, 2017). On November 30, 2017, Nite
Ize and OUII filed their responses to the
Commission’s notice and on December
7, 2017, OUII filed a reply to Nite Ize’s
response.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, the Commission has
determined to affirm, under modified
reasoning, the ALJ’s finding with
respect to the economic prong of the
domestic industry.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief in this
investigation is (a) a general exclusion
order directed against products that
infringe one or more of claims 1, 11, and
12 of the ’376 patent and claims 1, 11,
and 12 of the ’146 patent; and (b) cease
and desist orders prohibiting Trendbox,
Tenswall, REXS LLC, Minse, IdeaPro,
LWANG, Novoland, Oumeiou, Pecham,
Runshion, Scotabc, Tontek, Wekin,
Anson, Newdreams, and IceFox from
importing, selling, offering for sale,
marketing, advertising, distributing,
offering for sale, transferring (except for
exportation), or soliciting U.S. agents or
distributors of imported mobile device
holders that infringe one or more of
claims 1, 11, and 12 of the ’376 patent
and claims 1, 11, and 12 of the ’146
patent. The Commission has further
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(d)(1)
(19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) and in section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(l)) do not
preclude the issuance of the general
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders, respectively. Finally, the
Commission has determined that the
bond for importation during the period
of Presidential review shall be in the
amount of 100 percent of the entered
value of the imported subject articles of
the respondents. The investigation is
terminated.
The Commission’s orders and opinion
were delivered to the President and the
United States Trade Representative on
the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 22, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–04026 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Feb 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Water
Act
On February 15, 2018, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois
in the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Buckeye Pipe Line Company, L.P., et al.,
Civil Action No. 18–cv–1194.
The United States filed a Complaint
for civil penalties and injunctive relief
alleging violations of Sections 301 and
311(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA)
arising out of the discharge of
approximately 705 barrels of jet fuel
from a pipeline near Palos Park, Cook
County, Illinois. The United States’
Complaint names as defendants
Buckeye Pipe Line Company, L.C., the
operator of the pipeline, and West Shore
Pipe Line Company, the owner of the
pipeline. Both defendants signed the
proposed Consent Decree to resolve
these claims, agreeing to pay a total of
$400,000 in civil penalties and to
maintain improvements made to
prevent future discharges. Specifically,
defendants have improved Control
Center diagrams and operating
procedures and have agreed to train all
relevant personnel on these
improvements. Defendants have also
agreed to annually report on further
improvements, corrective actions taken
on the relevant pipeline, individuals
trained and all releases reported to the
National Response Center.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. Buckeye Pipe
Line Co. L.P., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–
1–1–11370/2. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email ......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD,
P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
By mail ........
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $4.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–04083 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
190th Meeting of the Advisory Council
on Employee Welfare and Pension
Benefit Plans; Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to the authority contained in
Section 512 of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29
U.S.C. 1142, the 190th open meeting of
the Advisory Council on Employee
Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans (also
known as the ERISA Advisory Council)
will be held on March 27, 2018.
The meeting will take place in C5515
Rm. 2, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20210 from 9:00 a.m. to
approximately 3:00 p.m. The purpose of
the open meeting is to set and discuss
the topics to be addressed by the
Council in 2018.
Organizations or members of the
public wishing to submit a written
statement may do so by submitting 30
copies on or before March 20, 2018 to
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of
Labor, Suite N–5623, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.
Statements also may be submitted as
email attachments in text or pdf format
transmitted to good.larry@dol.gov. It is
requested that statements not be
included in the body of the email.
Relevant statements received on or
before March 20, 2018 will be included
in the record of the meeting. No
deletions, modifications, or redactions
will be made to the statements received,
as they are public records.
Individuals or representatives of
organizations wishing to address the
Advisory Council should forward their
requests to the Executive Secretary or
telephone (202) 693–8668. Oral
presentations will be limited to ten
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8709-8710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04026]
[[Page 8709]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1028]
Certain Mobile Device Holders and Components Thereof;
Commission's Determination To Affirm a Domestic Industry Finding Under
Modified Reasoning; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order; Issuance of
Sixteen Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm under modified reasoning the ALJ's
finding on the economic prong of the domestic industry. The Commission
has also determined to issue a general exclusion order directed against
infringing mobile device holders and components thereof, and has issued
sixteen cease and desist orders against various defaulting respondents.
The investigation is hereby terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 14, 2016, based on a complaint and supplements, filed on
behalf of Nite Ize, Inc. of Boulder, Colorado (``Nite Ize''). 81 FR
79519-20 (Nov. 14, 2016). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain mobile device holders and components
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,602,376 (``the '376 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 8,870,146 (``the '146
patent''), U.S. Patent No. D734,746 (``the '746 patent''), and U.S.
Patent No. D719,959 (``the '959 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The Commission's notice of
investigation named the following respondents: REXS, LLC (``REXS LLC'')
of Lewes, Delaware; Spinido, Inc. of Brighton, Colorado; Guangzhou
Kuaguoyi E-commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Kagu Culture (``Kagu Culture'') of
Baiyum, China; Sunpauto Co., Ltd. (``Sunpauto'') of Kowloon, Hong Kong;
Shenzhen Topworld Technology Co. d/b/a IdeaPro (``IdeaPro'') of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong; Ninghuaxian Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian Gongsi,
Ltd., d/b/a EasybuyUS of Shanghai, China; Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly of
Duluth, Georgia; Trendbox USA LLC d/b/a Trendbox (``Trendbox'') of
Scottsdale, Arizona; Tenswall d/b/a Shenzhen Tenswall International
Trading Co. (``Tenswall'') of La Puente, California; Luo Jieqiong d/b/a
Wekin (``Wekin'') of Chang Sha, China; Pecham d/b/a Baichen Technology
Ltd. (``Pecham'') of Wan Chai, Hong Kong; Cyrift d/b/a Guangzhou Sunway
E-Commerce LLC of Guangzhou, China; Rymemo d/b/a Global Box, LLC of
Dunbar, Pennsylvania; Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix of Hubei, China; Zhongshan
Feiyu Hardware Technology Co., Ltd d/b/a YouFo (``YouFo'') of ZhongShan
City, China; and Shenzhen Youtai Trade Company Limited, d/b/a NoChoice;
Luo, Qiben, d/b/a Lita International Shop of Nanshan; Shenzhen New
Dream Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Newdreams (``Newdreams''); Shenznen
Gold South Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baidatong; Wang Zhi Gang d/b/a
IceFox (``Icefox''); Dang Yuya d/b/a Sminiker; Lin Zhen Mei d/b/a Anson
(``Anson''); Wu Xuying d/b/a Novoland (``Novoland''); Shenzhen New
Dream Sailing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream; Tontek
d/b/a Shenzhen Hetongtai Electronics Co., Ltd. (``Tontek''); Scotabc d/
b/a ShenChuang Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.(``Scotabc'');
Zhiping Zhou d/b/a Runshion (``Runshion''); Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui
Ju Kang Technology Co. Ltd.; Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen Senweite Electronic
Commerce Ltd.; Oumeiou d/b/a Shenzhen Oumeiou Technology Co., Ltd.
(``Oumeiou''); Grando d/b/a Shenzhen Dashentai Network Technology Co.,
Ltd.; Shenzhen Yingxue Technology Co., Ltd. (``Shenzhen Yingxue'');
Shenzhen Longwang Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a LWANG (``LWANG''); Hu
Peng d/b/a AtomBud; and Wang Guoxiang d/b/a Minse (``Minse'') all of
Shenzhen, China. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'')
was named as a party to the investigation.
Rymemo d/b/a Global Box, LLC and Chang Lee d/b/a Frentaly were
terminated on the basis of a consent order. Commission Notice (March
21, 2017); Commission Notice (May 15, 2017). Barsone d/b/a Shenzhen
Senweite Electronic Commerce Ltd., Shenzhen Youtai Trade Company
Limited, d/b/a NoChoice, Ninghuaxian Wangfulong Chaojishichang Youxian
Gongsi, Ltd., d/b/a EasybuyUS, Shenzhen Gold South Technology Co., Ltd.
d/b/a Baidatong, Cyrift d/b/a Guangzhou Sunway E-Commerce LLC, Hu Peng
d/b/a AtomBud, Grando d/b/a Shenzhen Dashentai Network Technology Co.,
Ltd., Huijukon d/b/a Shenzhen Hui Ju Kang Technology Co. Ltd., Luo,
Qiben, d/b/a Lita International Shop, Shenzhen New Dream Sailing
Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a MegaDream, Spinido Inc., Dang
Yuya d/b/a Sminiker, and Yuan I d/b/a Bestrix were terminated because
service could not be effected. Commission Notice (June 13, 2017). The
remaining respondents were previously found in default (collectively,
``the Defaulting Respondents''). Commission Notice (May 26, 2017). In
addition, the '746 and '959 patents were previously terminated from the
investigation. Commission Notice (July 28, 2017).
On May 18, 2017, Nite Ize filed a Motion for Summary Determination
of Violation by the Defaulting Respondents and for a Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding, Including Issuance of a General
Exclusion Order, Limited Exclusion Orders (in the alternative), and
Cease and Desist Orders. On June 16, 2017, the ALJ issued an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 14) granting in-part Nite Ize's
motion for summary determination. The Commission determined not to
review that ID. Commission Notice (July 14, 2017).
On September 12, 2017, the ALJ issued his final initial
determination (``FID'') finding a violation of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337. On the same day, the ALJ issued his
Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding. No petitions for
review of the FID were filed.
On November 13, 2017, the Commission determined to review the FID's
findings on the economic prong of domestic industry and requested
briefing on remedy, bonding, and the
[[Page 8710]]
public interest. 82 FR 54413-14 (Nov. 17, 2017). On November 30, 2017,
Nite Ize and OUII filed their responses to the Commission's notice and
on December 7, 2017, OUII filed a reply to Nite Ize's response.
Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission
has determined to affirm, under modified reasoning, the ALJ's finding
with respect to the economic prong of the domestic industry.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief
in this investigation is (a) a general exclusion order directed against
products that infringe one or more of claims 1, 11, and 12 of the '376
patent and claims 1, 11, and 12 of the '146 patent; and (b) cease and
desist orders prohibiting Trendbox, Tenswall, REXS LLC, Minse, IdeaPro,
LWANG, Novoland, Oumeiou, Pecham, Runshion, Scotabc, Tontek, Wekin,
Anson, Newdreams, and IceFox from importing, selling, offering for
sale, marketing, advertising, distributing, offering for sale,
transferring (except for exportation), or soliciting U.S. agents or
distributors of imported mobile device holders that infringe one or
more of claims 1, 11, and 12 of the '376 patent and claims 1, 11, and
12 of the '146 patent. The Commission has further determined that the
public interest factors enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(1)) and in section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(l)) do not
preclude the issuance of the general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders, respectively. Finally, the Commission has determined
that the bond for importation during the period of Presidential review
shall be in the amount of 100 percent of the entered value of the
imported subject articles of the respondents. The investigation is
terminated.
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President
and the United States Trade Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 22, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-04026 Filed 2-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
