Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016, 6515-6516 [2018-02896]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices Dated: February 6, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Separate Rate Status for Jianlong Comment 2: Separate Rate Status for Meihua Comment 3: Application of Partial Adverse Facts Available to Deosen Comment 4: Rate Assignment for Meihua Based on Its Voluntary Respondent Status Request Comment 5: Rate Assignment for Separate Rate Applicants Comment 6: Clerical Error Regarding Fufeng’s U.S. Packing Expenses VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–02915 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 11, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published its Preliminary Results for the January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, administrative review of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) from the People’s Republic of China (China). Although invited to do so, interested parties did not comment on our Preliminary Results. We have adopted the Preliminary Results as the final results. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Applicable February 14, 2018. Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 Background On October 11, 2017, Commerce published its Preliminary Results of the review of the antidumping duty order on WBF from China for one mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd. (Decca), and twelve other companies covering the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016 (the period of review (POR)).1 No parties commented on the Preliminary Results. Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce’s practice, the deadline will become the next business day. The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now February 15, 2018.2 Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.3 Based on a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ruling indicating that CBP would no longer use certain harmonized tariff schedule subheadings to classify items that are within the scope of the Order,4 Commerce preliminarily revised the scope to include the harmonized tariff schedule numbers under which subject merchandise is entered.5 No parties commented on this revision. Hence, we have adopted this revision in these final results. Under this revision, imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided 1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016, 82 FR 47172 (October 11, 2017) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the nonexclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. 3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (Order). 4 See letter from the petitioners, re: ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China: Petitioners’ Comments Regarding the Upcoming Preliminary Results,’’ dated August 29, 2017. 5 See Preliminary Results, at 47173. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6515 for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.6 Analysis As noted above, no parties commented on the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are adopting the decisions in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum for these final results of review. In the Preliminary Results, Commerce: (1) Determined that four companies, including Decca, did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate and are part of the China-wide entity; 7 (2) determined that eight companies had no shipments of subject merchandise; 8 and (3) rescinded the review for Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial, Ltd. (HK Ltd.) (collectively, Fortune Glory), for whom all review requests were withdrawn.9 For these final results of review, we have continued to treat the four companies, including Decca, as part of the China-wide entity and have continued to find that eight companies had no shipments during the POR. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, we are not conducting a review of the China-wide entity.10 Thus, there is no change to the rate for the China-wide entity from the Preliminary Results. The existing rate 6 For a complete description of the scope of the Order and a discussion of the revisions to the HTSUS numbers in the scope, see Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China, from James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated October 11, 2017. 7 The other three companies are: (1) Changshu HTC Import & Export Co., Ltd.; (2) Starwood Industries Ltd.; and (3) U-Rich Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd.; U-Rich Furniture Ltd. 8 The eight companies/company groupings are: (1) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (2) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmont Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Eurosa Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Golden Well International (HK) Limited; Zhangzhou Xym Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (5) RiZhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (7) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; and (8) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc. 9 See Preliminary Results, at 47172. 10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1 6516 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 14, 2018 / Notices for the China-wide entity is 216.01 percent. For additional details, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. Commerce intends to instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of subject merchandise exported during this POR by Decca and the other three companies noted above which did not qualify for separate rate status, at the China-wide rate. Additionally, pursuant to Commerce’s practice in NME cases, if there are any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR under the case numbers of the eight companies that claimed no shipments of subject merchandise, they will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.11 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal Register of the final results of this review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed China and non-China exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all China exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-China exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation that is subject to sanction. This notice of the final results of this antidumping duty administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: January 24, 2018. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018–02896 Filed 2–13–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 11 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:07 Feb 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–805] Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final Results and Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Mutlu Makarnacilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Mutlu), an exporter of certain pasta (pasta) from Turkey and the sole respondent subject to this administrative review, had no bona fide sales during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. Therefore, we are rescinding this administrative review. DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2924. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On August 7, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register.1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On September 6, 2017, we received case briefs from petitioners American Italian Pasta Company, Dakota Growers Pasta Company, and New World Pasta Company (the petitioners) and from the respondent, Mutlu. On September 19, 2017, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioners and Mutlu. On September 21, 2017, Commerce rejected Mutlu’s case brief because it contained new factual information after the deadline for such information.2 Mutlu subsequently removed the new factual information from its case brief, and resubmitted the case brief on September 23, 2017. Commerce exercised its discretion to toll deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce’s practice, 1 See Certain Pasta from Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 82 FR 36737 (August 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Commerce Letter dated September 21, 2017. E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM 14FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6515-6516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published its Preliminary Results for the January 1, 2016, through 
December 31, 2016, administrative review of the antidumping duty order 
on wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) from the People's Republic of China 
(China). Although invited to do so, interested parties did not comment 
on our Preliminary Results. We have adopted the Preliminary Results as 
the final results.

DATES: Applicable February 14, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-1593.

Background

    On October 11, 2017, Commerce published its Preliminary Results of 
the review of the antidumping duty order on WBF from China for one 
mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd. (Decca), and twelve other 
companies covering the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 
2016 (the period of review (POR)).\1\ No parties commented on the 
Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments in Part; 2016, 82 FR 47172 (October 11, 2017) (Preliminary 
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the 
duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 
through 22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in 
accordance with Commerce's practice, the deadline will become the next 
business day. The revised deadline for the final results of this review 
is now February 15, 2018.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of 
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been 
extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the Order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions.\3\ Based on a U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) ruling indicating that CBP would no longer use certain 
harmonized tariff schedule subheadings to classify items that are 
within the scope of the Order,\4\ Commerce preliminarily revised the 
scope to include the harmonized tariff schedule numbers under which 
subject merchandise is entered.\5\ No parties commented on this 
revision. Hence, we have adopted this revision in these final results. 
Under this revision, imports of subject merchandise are classified 
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 
subheadings: 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 
from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) 
(Order).
    \4\ See letter from the petitioners, re: ``Wooden Bedroom 
Furniture from China: Petitioners' Comments Regarding the Upcoming 
Preliminary Results,'' dated August 29, 2017.
    \5\ See Preliminary Results, at 47173.
    \6\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order and a 
discussion of the revisions to the HTSUS numbers in the scope, see 
Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China, from James Maeder, Senior Director, 
performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 
Duty and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum), dated October 11, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis

    As noted above, no parties commented on the Preliminary Results. 
Therefore, we are adopting the decisions in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum for these final results of review. In the Preliminary 
Results, Commerce: (1) Determined that four companies, including Decca, 
did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate and are part of 
the China-wide entity; \7\ (2) determined that eight companies had no 
shipments of subject merchandise; \8\ and (3) rescinded the review for 
Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial, Ltd. (HK 
Ltd.) (collectively, Fortune Glory), for whom all review requests were 
withdrawn.\9\ For these final results of review, we have continued to 
treat the four companies, including Decca, as part of the China-wide 
entity and have continued to find that eight companies had no shipments 
during the POR. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide 
entity, we are not conducting a review of the China-wide entity.\10\ 
Thus, there is no change to the rate for the China-wide entity from the 
Preliminary Results. The existing rate

[[Page 6516]]

for the China-wide entity is 216.01 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The other three companies are: (1) Changshu HTC Import & 
Export Co., Ltd.; (2) Starwood Industries Ltd.; and (3) U-Rich 
Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd.; U-Rich Furniture Ltd.
    \8\ The eight companies/company groupings are: (1) Dongguan 
Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., 
Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (2) Dongguan 
Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry, Co., Ltd., 
Taicang Fairmont Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Eurosa 
Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Golden Well International (HK) 
Limited; Zhangzhou Xym Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (5) RiZhao Sanmu 
Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., 
Ltd.; (7) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; and (8) 
Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
    \9\ See Preliminary Results, at 47172.
    \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 
4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For additional details, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
which is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic 
versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and 
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of 
subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this 
review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 
days after the publication date of the final results of this review. 
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of subject 
merchandise exported during this POR by Decca and the other three 
companies noted above which did not qualify for separate rate status, 
at the China-wide rate.
    Additionally, pursuant to Commerce's practice in NME cases, if 
there are any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR 
under the case numbers of the eight companies that claimed no shipments 
of subject merchandise, they will be liquidated at the China-wide 
rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the 
Federal Register of the final results of this review, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or 
reviewed China and non-China exporters which are not under review in 
this segment of the proceeding but which received a separate rate in a 
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all China exporters 
of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-China 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese 
exporter that supplied that non-China exporter.
    These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation that is subject to sanction.
    This notice of the final results of this antidumping duty 
administrative review is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: January 24, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-02896 Filed 2-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.