Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule To Amend the BOX Volume Rebate, 6281-6283 [2018-02865]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
FB SPX Surcharge is intended to be
assessed on those Floor Brokers who
regularly conduct open outcry
transactions in SPX or SPX Weeklys
(i.e., Floor Brokers who are engaging in
regular SPX trades), since those Floor
Brokers are engaging in transactions for
which executing SPX trades is the
primary purpose of such transactions (or
are signing up to do so). Floor Brokers
who only engage in SPX transactions
through the execution of Multi-Class
Spread Orders with an SPX component
are not engaging in such transactions
with primary purpose of executing an
SPX order, but instead are just executing
an SPX order as part of a larger MultiClass Spread Order. Additionally, all
Floor Brokers who only engage in SPX
transactions through the execution of
Multi-Class Spread Orders with an SPX
component will have the opportunity to
be excluded from the FB SPX Surcharge.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burdens on competition that are not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, because the
proposed rule change provides Floor
Brokers not engaged in regular SPX
trades with an opportunity to be
excluded from the FB SPX Surcharge,
which is intended to be assessed on
those Floor Brokers who engage in
transactions for which executing SPX
trades is the primary purpose of such
transactions (or are signing up to do so).
The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule changes will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed rule change only
affects trading on the Exchange’s trading
floor. To the extent that the proposed
changes make Cboe Options a more
attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become Cboe Options market
participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 7 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 8 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2018–015 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2018–015. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
7 15
8 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6281
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2018–015 and
should be submitted on or before March
6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02859 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82655; File No. SR–BOX–
2018–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Fee Schedule To Amend the BOX
Volume Rebate
February 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
31, 2018, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4
which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
6282
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend the Fee Schedule. While
changes to the fee schedule pursuant to
this proposal will be effective upon
filing, the changes will become
operative on February 1, 2018. The text
of the proposed rule change is available
from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s internet website at https://
boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule for trading on BOX.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend the BOX Volume Rebate (‘‘BVR’’)
in Section I.B.2 of the Fee Schedule
(Electronic Transaction Fees).
Under the current BVR, the Exchange
offers a tiered per contract rebate for all
Public Customer PIP Orders and COPIP
orders of 100 contracts and under that
do not trade solely with their contra
order. Percentage thresholds are
calculated on a monthly basis by
totaling the Participant’s PIP and COPIP
volume submitted to BOX, relative to
the total national Customer volume in
multiply-listed options classes. Further,
Public Customer PIP Orders of 100 and
under contracts that trade solely with
their contra order receive a $0.03 per
contract rebate, regardless of tier.
The Exchange now proposes to
increase the BVR contract threshold
necessary to qualify for the tiered
contract rebate for all Public Customer
PIP Orders and COPIP Orders to 250
contracts and under that do not trade
solely with their contra order. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
calculation of the percentage threshold
will remain based on a Participant’s PIP
and COPIP volume submitted to BOX,
relative to the total national Customer
volume in multiply-listed options
classes. The Exchange also proposes to
increase the BVR contract threshold for
Public Customer PIP Orders that trade
solely with their contra order to 250
contracts and under. These orders will
continue to receive a $0.03 per contract
rebate, regardless of tier.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5)of the Act,5 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and
other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
amendments to the BVR in Section I.B.2
are reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. The BVR was
adopted to attract Public Customer order
flow to the Exchange by offering these
Participants incentives to submit their
PIP and COPIP Orders to the Exchange.
Other Exchanges employ similar
incentive programs.6 The Exchange
believes it is reasonable and appropriate
to provide incentives for Public
Customers, which will result in greater
liquidity and ultimately benefit all
Participants trading on the Exchange.
Further, the Exchange continues to
believe that exempting Non-Public
Customer PIP and COPIP Orders from
the BVR is reasonable as specific
incentives for Public Customer volume
is common within the options
industry.7
As mentioned above, the BVR is
intended to incentivize Public
Customers to direct order flow to the
Exchange. As such, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to increase the
threshold eligibility for Public Customer
PIP and COPIP Orders to 250 contracts
and under. Increasing the BVR will
result in greater liquidity and ultimately
benefit all Participants trading on the
Exchange. Further, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
Section B of the Phlx Pricing Schedule
entitled ‘‘Customer Rebate Program’’ and CBOE’s
Volume Incentive Program (VIP). CBOE’s Volume
Incentive Program (‘‘VIP’’) pays certain tiered
rebates to Trading Permit Holders for electronically
executed multiply-listed option orders which
include AIM orders.
7 Id.
6 See
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discriminatory as it will apply to all
Public Customers uniformly.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change burdens competition
and will instead help promote
competition by continuing to providing
incentives for market participants to
submit customer order flow to BOX and
thus, create a greater opportunity for
price improvement.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 8 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,9 because it
establishes or changes a due, or fee.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that the
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or would otherwise further
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2018–03 on the subject line.
8 15
9 17
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2018–03. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2018–03, and should
be submitted on or before March 6,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02865 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82649; File No. SR–Phlx–
2018–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Delete CrossReference to Rule 124(d) From Rule
1092
February 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
5, 2018, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 1092, Nullification and
Adjustment of Options Transactions
including Obvious Errors, by deleting a
cross-reference to Rule 124(d).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
2 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6283
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Exchange Rule 1092 provides rules
and procedures with respect to the
nullification and adjustment of options
transactions including obvious errors.
Rule 1092(l) governs appeals to the
Exchange Review Council of
nullification and adjustment decisions
by Options Exchange Officials.3 It
provides that a party affected by a
determination made under Rule 1092
may request the Exchange Review
Council to review that determination
‘‘in accordance with Exchange Rule
124(d).’’ However, Rule 124, DisputesOptions, section (d) applies by its terms
only to appeals to the Exchange Review
Council of Options Exchange Official
decisions regarding trading disputes
occurring on, and relating to, the trading
floor. In fact, Rule 124(a) specifically
states that Rule 124 shall not apply to
options transactions that are the result
of an obvious error or catastrophic error
as defined in Rule 1092, and that
options transactions that are the result
of an obvious error or catastrophic error
shall be subject to the provisions and
procedures set forth in Rule 1092.
The cross-reference to Rule 124(d) in
Rule 1092 is therefore incorrect and
inappropriate, and needlessly
confusing. Moreover, it is unnecessary
as Rule 1092 itself provides the
necessary process for requesting and
obtaining an appeal by the Exchange
Review Council of nullification and
adjustment decisions. The Exchange
therefore proposes to remove the crossreference.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,5
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
3 An Options Exchange Official is an Exchange
staff member or contract employee designated as
such by the Chief Regulatory Officer. A list of
individual Options Exchange Officials is displayed
on the Exchange website. The Chief Regulatory
Officer maintains the list of Options Exchange
Officials and updates the website each time a name
is added to, or deleted from, the list of Options
Exchange Officials. In the event no Options
Exchange Official is available to rule on a particular
matter, the Chief Regulatory Officer or his/her
designee rules on the matter.
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6281-6283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02865]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82655; File No. SR-BOX-2018-03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule To Amend the BOX Volume Rebate
February 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 31, 2018, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6282]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule.
While changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal will be
effective upon filing, the changes will become operative on February 1,
2018. The text of the proposed rule change is available from the
principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference
Room and also on the Exchange's internet website at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend the BOX Volume Rebate
(``BVR'') in Section I.B.2 of the Fee Schedule (Electronic Transaction
Fees).
Under the current BVR, the Exchange offers a tiered per contract
rebate for all Public Customer PIP Orders and COPIP orders of 100
contracts and under that do not trade solely with their contra order.
Percentage thresholds are calculated on a monthly basis by totaling the
Participant's PIP and COPIP volume submitted to BOX, relative to the
total national Customer volume in multiply-listed options classes.
Further, Public Customer PIP Orders of 100 and under contracts that
trade solely with their contra order receive a $0.03 per contract
rebate, regardless of tier.
The Exchange now proposes to increase the BVR contract threshold
necessary to qualify for the tiered contract rebate for all Public
Customer PIP Orders and COPIP Orders to 250 contracts and under that do
not trade solely with their contra order. The calculation of the
percentage threshold will remain based on a Participant's PIP and COPIP
volume submitted to BOX, relative to the total national Customer volume
in multiply-listed options classes. The Exchange also proposes to
increase the BVR contract threshold for Public Customer PIP Orders that
trade solely with their contra order to 250 contracts and under. These
orders will continue to receive a $0.03 per contract rebate, regardless
of tier.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed amendments to the BVR in Section
I.B.2 are reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The
BVR was adopted to attract Public Customer order flow to the Exchange
by offering these Participants incentives to submit their PIP and COPIP
Orders to the Exchange. Other Exchanges employ similar incentive
programs.\6\ The Exchange believes it is reasonable and appropriate to
provide incentives for Public Customers, which will result in greater
liquidity and ultimately benefit all Participants trading on the
Exchange. Further, the Exchange continues to believe that exempting
Non-Public Customer PIP and COPIP Orders from the BVR is reasonable as
specific incentives for Public Customer volume is common within the
options industry.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Section B of the Phlx Pricing Schedule entitled
``Customer Rebate Program'' and CBOE's Volume Incentive Program
(VIP). CBOE's Volume Incentive Program (``VIP'') pays certain tiered
rebates to Trading Permit Holders for electronically executed
multiply-listed option orders which include AIM orders.
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As mentioned above, the BVR is intended to incentivize Public
Customers to direct order flow to the Exchange. As such, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to increase the threshold eligibility for
Public Customer PIP and COPIP Orders to 250 contracts and under.
Increasing the BVR will result in greater liquidity and ultimately
benefit all Participants trading on the Exchange. Further, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as it will apply to all Public Customers uniformly.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed change burdens competition and will instead help
promote competition by continuing to providing incentives for market
participants to submit customer order flow to BOX and thus, create a
greater opportunity for price improvement.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\9\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2018-03 on the subject line.
[[Page 6283]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2018-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2018-03, and should be submitted on
or before March 6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02865 Filed 2-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P