Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to Market Data Fees, 6275-6279 [2018-02858]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
U.S.C. 3301, (et seq.) or a PBGC records
disposition schedule approved by
NARA.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Any individual commenting on
PBGC’s rulemaking activities or
submitting supporting materials; any
individual initiating contact with the
PBGC through use of the agency
website.
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL
SAFEGUARDS:
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Comments and supporting
documentation from the public (may
include name, email address, physical
address, phone numbers, PBGC
customer identification numbers, Social
Security numbers, dates of birth, dates
of hire, dates of termination, marital
status, pay status); agency rulemaking
materials; Federal Register publications;
scientific and financial studies; IP
information; cookies (session and
persistent); and, internet protocol (IP)
addresses.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Individuals commenting on agency
rulemaking; individuals contacting
PBGC via the agency website.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
Information about covered
individuals may be disclosed without
consent as permitted by the Privacy Act
of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 522a(b), and:
1. General Routine Uses G1 through
G14 apply to this system of records (see
Prefatory Statement of General Routine
Uses).
2. Information, including personally
identifiable information (PII), contained
in comments about agency rulemaking,
whether submitted through pbgc.gov or
regulations.gov, may be published to the
PBGC website.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF
RECORDS:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF
RECORDS:
Information from this system may be
retrieved by numerous data elements
and key word searches, including, but
not limited to name, dates, subject, and
other information retrievable with fulltext searching capability.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND
DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
Records are maintained and destroyed
in accordance with the National
Archives and Record Administration’s
(NARA) Basic Laws and Authorities (44
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals, or third parties with
written authorization from the
individual, wishing to request access to
their records in accordance with 29 CFR
4902.4, should submit a written request
to the Disclosure Officer, PBGC, 1200 K
Street NW, Washington, DC 20005,
providing their name, address, date of
birth, and verification of their identity
in accordance with 29 CFR 4902.3(c).
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Records are maintained in electronic
form (including computer databases or
discs). Records may also be maintained
on back-up tapes, or on a PBGC or a
contractor-hosted network.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
PBGC has established security and
privacy protocols that meet the required
security and privacy standards issued
by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST). Records are
maintained in a secure, password
protected electronic system that utilizes
security hardware and software to
include multiple firewalls, active
intruder detection, and role-based
access controls. PBGC has adopted
appropriate administrative, technical,
and physical controls in accordance
with PBGC’s security program to protect
the confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of the information, and to
ensure that records are not disclosed to
or accessed by unauthorized
individuals.
Electronic records are stored on
computer networks, which may include
cloud-based systems, and protected by
controlled access with Personal Identity
Verification (PIV) cards, assigning user
accounts to individuals needing access
to the records and by passwords set by
authorized users that must be changed
periodically.
Individuals, or third parties with
written authorization from the
individual, wishing to amend their
records must submit a written request
identifying the information they wish to
correct in their file, in addition to
following the requirements of the
Record Access Procedure above.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
Individuals, or third parties with
written authorization from the
individual, wishing to learn whether
this system of records contains
information about them should submit a
written request to the Disclosure Officer,
PBGC, 1200 K Street NW, Washington,
DC 20005, providing their name,
address, date of birth, and verification of
their identity in accordance with 29
CFR 4902.3(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6275
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
HISTORY:
None.
[FR Doc. 2018–02882 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82647; File No. SR–C2–
2018–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Related to Market Data
Fees
February 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
30, 2018, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Cboe Data Services (‘‘CDS’’) fee
schedule to increase the fees for the
BBO, Book Depth, and Complex Order
Book (‘‘COB’’) data feeds.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.c2exchange.com/
Legal/), at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
13FEN1
6276
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
CDS fee schedule to increase the fees for
the BBO, Book Depth, and COB data
feeds.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
BBO and Book Depth Data Feed
The BBO Data Feed is a real-time data
feed that includes the following
information: (i) Outstanding quotes and
standing orders at the best available
price level on each side of the market;
(ii) executed trades time, size, and price;
(iii) totals of customer versus noncustomer contracts at the best bid and
offer (‘‘BBO’’); (iv) all-or-none
contingency orders priced better than or
equal to the BBO; (v) expected opening
price and expected opening size; (vi)
end-of-day summaries by product,
including open, high, low, and closing
price during the trading session; (vi)
recap messages any time there is a
change in the open, high, low or last
sale price of a listed option; (vii) COB
information; and (viii) product IDs and
codes for all listed options contracts.
The quote and last sale data contained
in the BBO data feed is identical to the
data sent to the Options Price Reporting
Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) for redistribution
to the public.
The Book Depth Data Feed is a realtime, low latency data feed that includes
all data contained in the BBO Data Feed
described above plus outstanding quotes
and standing orders up to the first four
price levels on each side of the market,
with aggregate size (‘‘Book Depth’’).
CDS currently charges a Data Fee,
payable by a Customer, of $1,500 per
month for internal use and external
redistribution of the BBO and/or Book
Depth data feeds.3 The Data Fee entitles
a Customer to provide the BBO and/or
the Book Depth data feed to an
unlimited number of internal users and
Devices 4 within the Customer. A
3 A BBO Data Feed ‘‘Customer’’ is any person,
company or other entity that, pursuant to a market
data agreement with CDS, is entitled to receive data,
either directly from CDS or through an authorized
redistributor (i.e., a Customer or an extranet service
provider), whether that data is distributed
externally or used internally. The CDS fee schedule
for Exchange data is located at https://
www.cboe.org/general-info/pdfframed?content=/
publish/mdxfees/cboe-cds-fees-schedule-for-cboedatafeeds.pdf§ion=SEC_MDX_CSM&
title=Cboe%20CDS%20Fees%20Schedule.
4 A ‘‘Device’’ means any computer, workstation or
other item of equipment, fixed or portable, that
receives, accesses and/or displays data in visual,
audible or other form.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
Customer receiving the BBO and/or
Book Depth data feeds from another
Customer is assessed the Data Fee by
CDS pursuant to its own market data
agreement with CDS, and is entitled to
use the Data internally and/or distribute
it externally.5 All Customers have the
same rights to utilize the data internally
and/or distribute it externally as long as
the Customer has entered into a written
agreement with CDS for the data and
pays the Data Fee.
The Exchange proposes to increase
the Data Fee for both the BBO and Book
Depth data feeds from $1,500 per month
to $2,500 per month.6 The Exchange is
not proposing to amend the User Fee for
either the BBO or Book Depth data
feeds. The Data Fee for the Book Depth
data feed will continue to be waived for
Customers who also purchase the
companion BBO data feed.7
COB Data Feed
The COB Data Feed is a real-time data
feed that includes data regarding the
Exchange’s Complex Order Book and
related complex order information. The
COB Data Feed contains the following
information for all Exchange-traded
complex order strategies (multi-leg
strategies such as spreads, straddles and
buy-writes): (i) Outstanding quotes and
standing orders on each side of the
market with aggregate size, (ii) data with
respect to executed trades (‘‘last sale
data’’), and (iii) totals of customer
versus non-customer contracts.
CDS currently charges Customers 8 of
the COB Data Feed a Data Fee of $100
per month plus applicable User Fees.
The Exchange now proposes to increase
the Data Fee for the COB data feed from
$100 to $1,000 per month.9 The
Exchange proposes to increase the fee
for the COB data feed to bring the cost
of the data feed in line with, but still
5 A Customer may choose to receive the data from
another Customer rather than directly from CDS’s
system because it does not want to or is not
equipped to manage the technology necessary to
establish a direct connection to CDS.
6 The Exchange also proposes to remove reference
in the BBO and Depth Book fees to the existing fees
becoming effective on January 1, 2017.
7 Such COB Data Feed Customers are still subject
to User Fees.
8 A Customer is any person, company or other
entity that, pursuant to a market data agreement
with CDS, is entitled to receive data, either directly
from CDS or through an authorized redistributor
(i.e., a Customer or an extranet service provider),
whether that data is distributed externally or used
internally. The CDS fee schedule for Exchange data
is located at https://www.cboe.org/general-info/
pdfframed?content=/publish/mdxfees/cboe-cdsfees-schedule-for-cboe-datafeeds.pdf§ion=SEC_
MDX_CSM&title=Cboe%20CDS%20Fees
%20Schedule.
9 The Exchange also proposes to remove
references to the existing fee becoming effective on
January 1, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lower than, that of similar data feeds
offered by other exchanges. The
Exchange is not proposing to amend the
User Fee for either the COB data feed.
The Data Fee for the COB Data Feed
would continue to be waived for
Customers of the BBO and/or Book
Depth data feeds.10
Implementation Date
The Exchange intends to implement
the proposed fees on February 1, 2018.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,11
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),12 in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members and
other recipients of Exchange data. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rates are equitable and nondiscriminatory in that they apply
uniformly to all recipients of Exchange
data. The Exchange believes the
proposed fees are competitive with
those charged by other venues and,
therefore, reasonable and equitably
allocated to recipients.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 11(A) of the Act 13 in that it
supports (i) fair competition among
brokers and dealers, among exchange
markets, and between exchange markets
and markets other than exchange
markets and (ii) the availability to
brokers, dealers, and investors of
information with respect to quotations
for and transactions in securities.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change
is consistent with Rule 603 of
Regulation NMS,14 which provides that
any national securities exchange that
distributes information with respect to
quotations for or transactions in an NMS
stock do so on terms that are not
unreasonably discriminatory. In
adopting Regulation NMS, the
Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations and broker-dealers
increased authority and flexibility to
offer new and unique market data to the
public. It was believed that this
authority would expand the amount of
data available to consumers, and also
spur innovation and competition for the
provision of market data.
In addition, the proposed fees would
not permit unfair discrimination
10 Such COB Data Feed Customers are still subject
to User Fees.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
13 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
14 17 CFR 242.603.
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
because all of the Exchange’s customers
and market data vendors who subscribe
to the above data feeds will be subject
to the proposed fees. The above data
feeds are distributed and purchased on
a voluntary basis, in that neither the
Exchange nor market data distributors
are required by any rule or regulation
purchase this data or to make this data
available. Accordingly, distributors and
users can discontinue use at any time
and for any reason, including due to an
assessment of the reasonableness of fees
charged. Firms have a wide variety of
alternative market data products from
which to choose, such as similar
proprietary data products offered by
other exchanges and consolidated data.
Moreover, the Exchange is not required
to make any proprietary data products
available or to offer any specific pricing
alternatives to any customers.
In addition, the fees that are the
subject of this rule filing are constrained
by competition. As explained below in
the Exchange’s Statement on Burden on
Competition, the existence of
alternatives to the above data feeds
further ensure that the Exchange cannot
set unreasonable fees, or fees that are
unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect such
alternatives. That is, the Exchange
competes with other exchanges (and
their affiliates) that provide similar
market data products. For example, the
above data feeds provide investors with
alternative market data and competes
with similar market data product
currently offered by other exchanges. If
another exchange (or its affiliate) were
to charge less to distribute its similar
product than the Exchange charges for
the above data feeds, prospective users
likely would not subscribe to, or would
cease subscribing to either market data
product.
The Exchange notes that the
Commission is not required to
undertake a cost-of-service or ratemaking approach. The Exchange
believes that, even if it were possible as
a matter of economic theory, cost-based
pricing for non-core market data would
be so complicated that it could not be
done practically.15
15 The Exchange believes that cost-based pricing
would be impractical because it would create
enormous administrative burdens for all parties,
including the Commission, to cost-regulate a large
number of participants and standardize and analyze
extraordinary amounts of information, accounts,
and reports. In addition, it is impossible to regulate
market data prices in isolation from prices charged
by markets for other services that are joint products.
Cost-based rate regulation would also lead to
litigation and may distort incentives, including
those to minimize costs and to innovate, leading to
further waste. Under cost-based pricing, the
Commission would be burdened with determining
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
BBO Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed
increase in the Data Fee for BBO data is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply
equally to all Customers. The Exchange
believes the proposed Data Fee is
reasonable because it is lower than fees
that other markets charge for similar
products. For example, Nasdaq PHLX
LLC (‘‘PHLX’’) charges Internal
Distributors a monthly fee of $4,500 per
organization and External Distributors a
monthly fee of $5,000 per organization
for its ‘‘TOPO Plus Orders’’ data feed,
which like the BBO Data Feed includes
top-of-book data (including orders,
quotes and trades) and other market
data.16 Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) offers a
‘‘Top Quote Feed’’, which includes topof-book data, and a separate ‘‘Spread
Feed’’, which like the BBO Data Feed
includes order and quote data for
complex strategies. ISE charges
distributors of its Top Quote Feed a base
monthly fee of $3,000 and distributors
of its Spread Feed a base monthly fee of
$3,000 17 (totally $6,000 in the aggregate
to receive the same data as offered by
the BBO feed). The Exchange believes
the proposed rate is reasonable based on
the value of the market data included in
the BBO feed and the market share that
the data represents. The Exchange also
notes that Customers who receive the
BBO feed may also receive the Book
Depth and COB data feeds at no extra
charge.
Book Depth Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed
Data Fee for the Book Depth Data Feed
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply
equally to all Customers. The Exchange
a fair rate of return, and the industry could
experience frequent rate increases based on
escalating expense levels. Even in industries
historically subject to utility regulation, cost-based
ratemaking has been discredited. As such, the
Exchange believes that cost-based ratemaking
would be inappropriate for proprietary market data
and inconsistent with Congress’s direction that the
Commission use its authority to foster the
development of the national market system, and
that market forces will continue to provide
appropriate pricing discipline. See Appendix C to
NYSE’s comments to the Commission’s 2000
Concept Release on the Regulation of Market
Information Fees and Revenues, which can be
found on the Commission’s website at https://
www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72899/buck1.htm. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73816
(December 11, 2014), 79 FR 75200 (December 17,
2014) (SR–NYSE–2014–64) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Establish an Access Fee for the NYSE Best Quote
and Trades Data Feed, Operative December 1,
2014).
16 See Section IX of the PHLX Pricing Schedule
(setting forth the fees for proprietary market data).
17 See Sections VIII(h) and (I) of the Nasdaq ISE
Schedule of Fees.
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6277
believes the proposed Data Fee is
reasonable because it is lower than fees
that other markets charge for similar
products. For example, PHLX charges
Internal Distributors a monthly fee of
$4,000 and External Distributors a
monthly fee of a $4,500 for its Depth
data feed that includes full depth of
quotes and orders and last sale data for
options listed on PHLX.18 In addition,
ISE charges a $5,000 per month
distributor fee for its Real-time Depth of
Market data feed.19 The Exchange also
notes that Customers who receive the
Book Depth feed may also receive the
BBO and COB data feeds at no extra
charge. The Exchange believes the
proposed rate is reasonable based on the
value of the market data included in the
BBO feed and the market share that the
data represents.
COB Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed
Data Fee for the COB Data Feed is
equitable, reasonable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because they would
apply equally to all Customers of the
COB Data Feed. The Exchange proposes
to increase the fee for the COB data feed
to bring the cost of the data feed in line
with, but still lower than, that of similar
data feeds offered by other exchanges.
For example, ISE charges distributors of
its Spread Feed a base monthly fee of
$3,000,20 equal to what the Exchange
proposes to charge for the COB data
feed. The Exchange also notes that
Customers who receive the BBO and
Book Depth feeds may also receive the
COB data feed at no extra charge. The
Exchange believes the proposed rate is
reasonable based on the value of the
market data included in the COB feed
and the market share that the data
represents.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
The Exchange’s ability to price the BBO,
Book Depth, ad COB data feeds is
constrained by: (i) Competition among
exchanges that compete with each other
in a variety of dimensions; (ii) the
existence of inexpensive real-time
consolidated data and market-specific
data and free delayed data; and (iii) the
inherent contestability of the market for
proprietary data.
18 See
19 See
supra note 16.
Section VIII(f) of the Nasdaq ISE Schedule
of Fees.
20 See Sections VIII(I) of the Nasdaq ISE Schedule
of Fees.
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
6278
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
An exchange’s ability to price its
proprietary data feed products is
constrained by (1) the existence of
actual competition for the sale of such
data, (2) the joint product nature of
exchange platforms, and (3) the
existence of alternatives to proprietary
data.
The Existence of Actual Competition.
The Exchange believes competition
provides an effective constraint on the
market data fees that the Exchange,
through CDS, has the ability and the
incentive to charge. The Exchange has a
compelling need to attract order flow
from market participants in order to
maintain its share of trading volume.
This compelling need to attract order
flow imposes significant pressure on the
Exchange to act reasonably in setting its
fees for market data, particularly given
that the market participants that will
pay such fees often will be the same
market participants from whom the
Exchange must attract order flow. These
market participants include brokerdealers that control the handling of a
large volume of customer and
proprietary order flow. Given the
portability of order flow from one
exchange to another, any exchange that
sought to charge unreasonably high data
fees would risk alienating many of the
same customers on whose orders it
depends for competitive survival. The
Exchange currently competes with
fourteen options exchanges (including
its affiliate, C2) for order flow.21
In addition, in the case of products
that are distributed through market data
vendors, the market data vendors
themselves provide additional price
discipline for proprietary data products
because they control the primary means
of access to certain end users. These
vendors impose price discipline based
upon their business models. For
example, vendors that assess a
surcharge on data they sell are able to
refuse to offer proprietary products that
their end users do not or will not
purchase in sufficient numbers. Internet
portals, such as Google, impose price
discipline by providing only data that
they believe will enable them to attract
‘‘eyeballs’’ that contribute to their
advertising revenue. Similarly,
Customers will not offer the BBO, Book
Depth or COB Data Feeds unless these
products will help them maintain
current users or attract new ones. For
example, a broker-dealer will not choose
21 The Commission has previously made a finding
that the options industry is subject to significant
competitive forces. See e.g., Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 59949 (May 20, 2009), 74 FR 25593
(May 28, 2009) (SR–ISE–2009–97) (order approving
ISE’s proposal to establish fees for a real-time depth
of market data offering).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
to offer the BBO, Book Depth or COB
Data Feeds to its retail customers unless
the broker-dealer believes that the retail
customers will use and value the data
and the provision of such data will help
the broker-dealer maintain the customer
relationship, which allows the brokerdealer to generate profits for itself.
Professional users will not request any
of these feeds from Customers unless
they can use the data for profitgenerating purposes in their businesses.
All of these operate as constraints on
pricing proprietary data products.
Joint Product Nature of Exchange
Platform. Transaction execution and
proprietary data products are
complementary in that market data is
both an input and a byproduct of the
execution service. In fact, market data
and trade executions are a paradigmatic
example of joint products with joint
costs. The decision whether and on
which platform to post an order will
depend on the attributes of the
platforms where the order can be
posted, including the execution fees,
data quality, and price and distribution
of their data products. The more trade
executions a platform does, the more
valuable its market data products
become. The costs of producing market
data include not only the costs of the
data distribution infrastructure, but also
the costs of designing, maintaining, and
operating the exchange’s transaction
execution platform and the cost of
regulating the exchange to ensure its fair
operation and maintain investor
confidence. The total return that a
trading platform earns reflects the
revenues it receives from both products
and the joint costs it incurs. Moreover,
an exchange’s broker-dealer customers
view the costs of transaction executions
and market data as a unified cost of
doing business with the exchange.
Analyzing the cost of market data
product production and distribution in
isolation from the cost of all of the
inputs supporting the creation of market
data and market data products will
inevitably underestimate the cost of the
data and data products. Thus, because it
is impossible to obtain the data inputs
to create market data products without
a fast, technologically robust, and wellregulated execution system, system
costs and regulatory costs affect the
price of both obtaining the market data
itself and creating and distributing
market data products. It would be
equally misleading, however, to
attribute all of an exchange’s costs to the
market data portion of an exchange’s
joint products. Rather, all of an
exchange’s costs are incurred for the
unified purposes of attracting order
flow, executing and/or routing orders,
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and generating and selling data about
market activity. The total return that an
exchange earns reflects the revenues it
receives from the joint products and the
total costs of the joint products.
The level of competition and
contestability in the market is evident in
the numerous alternative venues that
compete for order flow, including 15
options self-regulatory organization
(‘‘SRO’’) markets, as well as
internalizing broker-dealers (‘‘BDs’’) and
various forms of alternative trading
systems (‘‘ATSs’’), including dark pools
and electronic communication networks
(‘‘ECNs’’). Competition among trading
platforms can be expected to constrain
the aggregate return that each platform
earns from the sale of its joint products,
but different platforms may choose from
a range of possible, and equally
reasonable, pricing strategies as the
means of recovering total costs. For
example, some platforms may choose to
pay rebates to attract orders, charge
relatively low prices for market data
products (or provide market data
products free of charge), and charge
relatively high prices for accessing
posted liquidity. Other platforms may
choose a strategy of paying lower
rebates (or no rebates) to attract orders,
setting relatively high prices for market
data products, and setting relatively low
prices for accessing posted liquidity. In
this environment, there is no economic
basis for regulating maximum prices for
one of the joint products in an industry
in which suppliers face competitive
constraints with regard to the joint
offering.
The Existence of Alternatives. The
Exchange is constrained in pricing the
BBO, Book Depth and COB Data Feeds
by the availability to market participants
of alternatives to purchasing these
products. The Exchange must consider
the extent to which market participants
would choose one or more alternatives
instead of purchasing the exchange’s
data. Other options exchanges can and
have produced their own top-of-book,
book depth and complex strategies
market data products, and thus are
sources of potential competition for
CDS. For example, as noted above, ISE
and PHLX offer market data products
that compete with the BBO, Book Depth
and COB Data Feeds. The large number
of SROs, BDs, and ATSs that currently
produce proprietary data or are
currently capable of producing it
provides further pricing discipline for
proprietary data products. Each SRO,
ATS, and BD is currently permitted to
produce proprietary data products, and
many currently do. In addition, the
OPRA data feed is a significant
competitive alternative to the BBO and
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
last sale data included in the BBO and
Book Depth Data Feeds.
The existence of numerous
alternatives to the Exchange’s products,
including proprietary data from other
sources, ensures that the Exchange
cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees
that are unreasonably discriminatory,
when vendors and subscribers can elect
these alternatives or choose not to
purchase a specific proprietary data
product if its cost to purchase is not
justified by the returns any particular
vendor or subscriber would achieve
through the purchase.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 22 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 23 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
C2–2018–002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
22 15
23 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2018–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2018–002 and should
be submitted on or before March 6,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02858 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release Nos. 33–10456; 34–82656; File No.
265–28]
Investor Advisory Committee Meeting
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of meeting of Securities
and Exchange Commission Dodd-Frank
Investor Advisory Committee.
AGENCY:
The Securities and Exchange
Commission Investor Advisory
Committee, established pursuant to
Section 911 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
SUMMARY:
24 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6279
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act of 2010, is providing notice that it
will hold a public meeting. The public
is invited to submit written statements
to the Committee.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Thursday, March 8, 2018 from 9:30 a.m.
until 4:15 p.m. (ET). Written statements
should be received on or before March
8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
Multi-Purpose Room LL–006 at the
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The
meeting will be webcast on the
Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
Written statements may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Statements
D Use the Commission’s internet
submission form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml); or
D Send an email message to rulescomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. 265–28 on the subject line; or
Paper Statements
D Send paper statements to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
265–28. This file number should be
included on the subject line if email is
used. To help us process and review
your statement more efficiently, please
use only one method.
Statements also will be available for
website viewing and printing in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
100 F Street NE, Room 1503,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All statements
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc Oorloff Sharma, Chief Counsel,
Office of the Investor Advocate, at (202)
551–3302, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will be open to the public,
except during that portion of the
meeting reserved for an administrative
work session during lunch. Persons
needing special accommodations to take
part because of a disability should
notify the contact person listed in the
section above entitled FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6275-6279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02858]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82647; File No. SR-C2-2018-002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Market Data Fees
February 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 30, 2018, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Cboe Data Services (``CDS'') fee
schedule to increase the fees for the BBO, Book Depth, and Complex
Order Book (``COB'') data feeds.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the
Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of
[[Page 6276]]
the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the CDS fee schedule to increase the
fees for the BBO, Book Depth, and COB data feeds.
BBO and Book Depth Data Feed
The BBO Data Feed is a real-time data feed that includes the
following information: (i) Outstanding quotes and standing orders at
the best available price level on each side of the market; (ii)
executed trades time, size, and price; (iii) totals of customer versus
non-customer contracts at the best bid and offer (``BBO''); (iv) all-
or-none contingency orders priced better than or equal to the BBO; (v)
expected opening price and expected opening size; (vi) end-of-day
summaries by product, including open, high, low, and closing price
during the trading session; (vi) recap messages any time there is a
change in the open, high, low or last sale price of a listed option;
(vii) COB information; and (viii) product IDs and codes for all listed
options contracts. The quote and last sale data contained in the BBO
data feed is identical to the data sent to the Options Price Reporting
Authority (``OPRA'') for redistribution to the public.
The Book Depth Data Feed is a real-time, low latency data feed that
includes all data contained in the BBO Data Feed described above plus
outstanding quotes and standing orders up to the first four price
levels on each side of the market, with aggregate size (``Book
Depth'').
CDS currently charges a Data Fee, payable by a Customer, of $1,500
per month for internal use and external redistribution of the BBO and/
or Book Depth data feeds.\3\ The Data Fee entitles a Customer to
provide the BBO and/or the Book Depth data feed to an unlimited number
of internal users and Devices \4\ within the Customer. A Customer
receiving the BBO and/or Book Depth data feeds from another Customer is
assessed the Data Fee by CDS pursuant to its own market data agreement
with CDS, and is entitled to use the Data internally and/or distribute
it externally.\5\ All Customers have the same rights to utilize the
data internally and/or distribute it externally as long as the Customer
has entered into a written agreement with CDS for the data and pays the
Data Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A BBO Data Feed ``Customer'' is any person, company or other
entity that, pursuant to a market data agreement with CDS, is
entitled to receive data, either directly from CDS or through an
authorized redistributor (i.e., a Customer or an extranet service
provider), whether that data is distributed externally or used
internally. The CDS fee schedule for Exchange data is located at
https://www.cboe.org/general-info/pdfframed?content=/publish/mdxfees/cboe-cds-fees-schedule-for-cboe-datafeeds.pdf§ion=SEC_MDX_CSM&title=Cboe%20CDS%20Fees%20Schedule.
\4\ A ``Device'' means any computer, workstation or other item
of equipment, fixed or portable, that receives, accesses and/or
displays data in visual, audible or other form.
\5\ A Customer may choose to receive the data from another
Customer rather than directly from CDS's system because it does not
want to or is not equipped to manage the technology necessary to
establish a direct connection to CDS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to increase the Data Fee for both the BBO and
Book Depth data feeds from $1,500 per month to $2,500 per month.\6\ The
Exchange is not proposing to amend the User Fee for either the BBO or
Book Depth data feeds. The Data Fee for the Book Depth data feed will
continue to be waived for Customers who also purchase the companion BBO
data feed.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange also proposes to remove reference in the BBO
and Depth Book fees to the existing fees becoming effective on
January 1, 2017.
\7\ Such COB Data Feed Customers are still subject to User Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COB Data Feed
The COB Data Feed is a real-time data feed that includes data
regarding the Exchange's Complex Order Book and related complex order
information. The COB Data Feed contains the following information for
all Exchange-traded complex order strategies (multi-leg strategies such
as spreads, straddles and buy-writes): (i) Outstanding quotes and
standing orders on each side of the market with aggregate size, (ii)
data with respect to executed trades (``last sale data''), and (iii)
totals of customer versus non-customer contracts.
CDS currently charges Customers \8\ of the COB Data Feed a Data Fee
of $100 per month plus applicable User Fees. The Exchange now proposes
to increase the Data Fee for the COB data feed from $100 to $1,000 per
month.\9\ The Exchange proposes to increase the fee for the COB data
feed to bring the cost of the data feed in line with, but still lower
than, that of similar data feeds offered by other exchanges. The
Exchange is not proposing to amend the User Fee for either the COB data
feed. The Data Fee for the COB Data Feed would continue to be waived
for Customers of the BBO and/or Book Depth data feeds.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ A Customer is any person, company or other entity that,
pursuant to a market data agreement with CDS, is entitled to receive
data, either directly from CDS or through an authorized
redistributor (i.e., a Customer or an extranet service provider),
whether that data is distributed externally or used internally. The
CDS fee schedule for Exchange data is located at https://www.cboe.org/general-info/pdfframed?content=/publish/mdxfees/cboe-cds-fees-schedule-for-cboe-datafeeds.pdf§ion=SEC_MDX_CSM&title=Cboe%20CDS%20Fees%20Schedule.
\9\ The Exchange also proposes to remove references to the
existing fee becoming effective on January 1, 2017.
\10\ Such COB Data Feed Customers are still subject to User
Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation Date
The Exchange intends to implement the proposed fees on February 1,
2018.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\12\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its members and other recipients of
Exchange data. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all
recipients of Exchange data. The Exchange believes the proposed fees
are competitive with those charged by other venues and, therefore,
reasonable and equitably allocated to recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 11(A) of the Act \13\ in that it supports (i) fair
competition among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and
between exchange markets and markets other than exchange markets and
(ii) the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors of information
with respect to quotations for and transactions in securities.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 603 of
Regulation NMS,\14\ which provides that any national securities
exchange that distributes information with respect to quotations for or
transactions in an NMS stock do so on terms that are not unreasonably
discriminatory. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted
self-regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority
and flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It
was believed that this authority would expand the amount of data
available to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for
the provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
\14\ 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the proposed fees would not permit unfair
discrimination
[[Page 6277]]
because all of the Exchange's customers and market data vendors who
subscribe to the above data feeds will be subject to the proposed fees.
The above data feeds are distributed and purchased on a voluntary
basis, in that neither the Exchange nor market data distributors are
required by any rule or regulation purchase this data or to make this
data available. Accordingly, distributors and users can discontinue use
at any time and for any reason, including due to an assessment of the
reasonableness of fees charged. Firms have a wide variety of
alternative market data products from which to choose, such as similar
proprietary data products offered by other exchanges and consolidated
data. Moreover, the Exchange is not required to make any proprietary
data products available or to offer any specific pricing alternatives
to any customers.
In addition, the fees that are the subject of this rule filing are
constrained by competition. As explained below in the Exchange's
Statement on Burden on Competition, the existence of alternatives to
the above data feeds further ensure that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect such alternatives. That is, the
Exchange competes with other exchanges (and their affiliates) that
provide similar market data products. For example, the above data feeds
provide investors with alternative market data and competes with
similar market data product currently offered by other exchanges. If
another exchange (or its affiliate) were to charge less to distribute
its similar product than the Exchange charges for the above data feeds,
prospective users likely would not subscribe to, or would cease
subscribing to either market data product.
The Exchange notes that the Commission is not required to undertake
a cost-of-service or rate-making approach. The Exchange believes that,
even if it were possible as a matter of economic theory, cost-based
pricing for non-core market data would be so complicated that it could
not be done practically.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Exchange believes that cost-based pricing would be
impractical because it would create enormous administrative burdens
for all parties, including the Commission, to cost-regulate a large
number of participants and standardize and analyze extraordinary
amounts of information, accounts, and reports. In addition, it is
impossible to regulate market data prices in isolation from prices
charged by markets for other services that are joint products. Cost-
based rate regulation would also lead to litigation and may distort
incentives, including those to minimize costs and to innovate,
leading to further waste. Under cost-based pricing, the Commission
would be burdened with determining a fair rate of return, and the
industry could experience frequent rate increases based on
escalating expense levels. Even in industries historically subject
to utility regulation, cost-based ratemaking has been discredited.
As such, the Exchange believes that cost-based ratemaking would be
inappropriate for proprietary market data and inconsistent with
Congress's direction that the Commission use its authority to foster
the development of the national market system, and that market
forces will continue to provide appropriate pricing discipline. See
Appendix C to NYSE's comments to the Commission's 2000 Concept
Release on the Regulation of Market Information Fees and Revenues,
which can be found on the Commission's website at https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72899/buck1.htm. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 73816 (December 11, 2014), 79 FR 75200
(December 17, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-64) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Establish an
Access Fee for the NYSE Best Quote and Trades Data Feed, Operative
December 1, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BBO Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed increase in the Data Fee for BBO
data is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would
apply equally to all Customers. The Exchange believes the proposed Data
Fee is reasonable because it is lower than fees that other markets
charge for similar products. For example, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``PHLX'')
charges Internal Distributors a monthly fee of $4,500 per organization
and External Distributors a monthly fee of $5,000 per organization for
its ``TOPO Plus Orders'' data feed, which like the BBO Data Feed
includes top-of-book data (including orders, quotes and trades) and
other market data.\16\ Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') offers a ``Top Quote
Feed'', which includes top-of-book data, and a separate ``Spread
Feed'', which like the BBO Data Feed includes order and quote data for
complex strategies. ISE charges distributors of its Top Quote Feed a
base monthly fee of $3,000 and distributors of its Spread Feed a base
monthly fee of $3,000 \17\ (totally $6,000 in the aggregate to receive
the same data as offered by the BBO feed). The Exchange believes the
proposed rate is reasonable based on the value of the market data
included in the BBO feed and the market share that the data represents.
The Exchange also notes that Customers who receive the BBO feed may
also receive the Book Depth and COB data feeds at no extra charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Section IX of the PHLX Pricing Schedule (setting forth
the fees for proprietary market data).
\17\ See Sections VIII(h) and (I) of the Nasdaq ISE Schedule of
Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book Depth Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed Data Fee for the Book Depth Data
Feed is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would
apply equally to all Customers. The Exchange believes the proposed Data
Fee is reasonable because it is lower than fees that other markets
charge for similar products. For example, PHLX charges Internal
Distributors a monthly fee of $4,000 and External Distributors a
monthly fee of a $4,500 for its Depth data feed that includes full
depth of quotes and orders and last sale data for options listed on
PHLX.\18\ In addition, ISE charges a $5,000 per month distributor fee
for its Real-time Depth of Market data feed.\19\ The Exchange also
notes that Customers who receive the Book Depth feed may also receive
the BBO and COB data feeds at no extra charge. The Exchange believes
the proposed rate is reasonable based on the value of the market data
included in the BBO feed and the market share that the data represents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See supra note 16.
\19\ See Section VIII(f) of the Nasdaq ISE Schedule of Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COB Data Feed
The Exchange believes the proposed Data Fee for the COB Data Feed
is equitable, reasonable, and not unfairly discriminatory because they
would apply equally to all Customers of the COB Data Feed. The Exchange
proposes to increase the fee for the COB data feed to bring the cost of
the data feed in line with, but still lower than, that of similar data
feeds offered by other exchanges. For example, ISE charges distributors
of its Spread Feed a base monthly fee of $3,000,\20\ equal to what the
Exchange proposes to charge for the COB data feed. The Exchange also
notes that Customers who receive the BBO and Book Depth feeds may also
receive the COB data feed at no extra charge. The Exchange believes the
proposed rate is reasonable based on the value of the market data
included in the COB feed and the market share that the data represents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Sections VIII(I) of the Nasdaq ISE Schedule of Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The
Exchange's ability to price the BBO, Book Depth, ad COB data feeds is
constrained by: (i) Competition among exchanges that compete with each
other in a variety of dimensions; (ii) the existence of inexpensive
real-time consolidated data and market-specific data and free delayed
data; and (iii) the inherent contestability of the market for
proprietary data.
[[Page 6278]]
An exchange's ability to price its proprietary data feed products
is constrained by (1) the existence of actual competition for the sale
of such data, (2) the joint product nature of exchange platforms, and
(3) the existence of alternatives to proprietary data.
The Existence of Actual Competition. The Exchange believes
competition provides an effective constraint on the market data fees
that the Exchange, through CDS, has the ability and the incentive to
charge. The Exchange has a compelling need to attract order flow from
market participants in order to maintain its share of trading volume.
This compelling need to attract order flow imposes significant pressure
on the Exchange to act reasonably in setting its fees for market data,
particularly given that the market participants that will pay such fees
often will be the same market participants from whom the Exchange must
attract order flow. These market participants include broker-dealers
that control the handling of a large volume of customer and proprietary
order flow. Given the portability of order flow from one exchange to
another, any exchange that sought to charge unreasonably high data fees
would risk alienating many of the same customers on whose orders it
depends for competitive survival. The Exchange currently competes with
fourteen options exchanges (including its affiliate, C2) for order
flow.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Commission has previously made a finding that the
options industry is subject to significant competitive forces. See
e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59949 (May 20, 2009), 74
FR 25593 (May 28, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-97) (order approving ISE's
proposal to establish fees for a real-time depth of market data
offering).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, in the case of products that are distributed through
market data vendors, the market data vendors themselves provide
additional price discipline for proprietary data products because they
control the primary means of access to certain end users. These vendors
impose price discipline based upon their business models. For example,
vendors that assess a surcharge on data they sell are able to refuse to
offer proprietary products that their end users do not or will not
purchase in sufficient numbers. Internet portals, such as Google,
impose price discipline by providing only data that they believe will
enable them to attract ``eyeballs'' that contribute to their
advertising revenue. Similarly, Customers will not offer the BBO, Book
Depth or COB Data Feeds unless these products will help them maintain
current users or attract new ones. For example, a broker-dealer will
not choose to offer the BBO, Book Depth or COB Data Feeds to its retail
customers unless the broker-dealer believes that the retail customers
will use and value the data and the provision of such data will help
the broker-dealer maintain the customer relationship, which allows the
broker-dealer to generate profits for itself. Professional users will
not request any of these feeds from Customers unless they can use the
data for profit-generating purposes in their businesses. All of these
operate as constraints on pricing proprietary data products.
Joint Product Nature of Exchange Platform. Transaction execution
and proprietary data products are complementary in that market data is
both an input and a byproduct of the execution service. In fact, market
data and trade executions are a paradigmatic example of joint products
with joint costs. The decision whether and on which platform to post an
order will depend on the attributes of the platforms where the order
can be posted, including the execution fees, data quality, and price
and distribution of their data products. The more trade executions a
platform does, the more valuable its market data products become. The
costs of producing market data include not only the costs of the data
distribution infrastructure, but also the costs of designing,
maintaining, and operating the exchange's transaction execution
platform and the cost of regulating the exchange to ensure its fair
operation and maintain investor confidence. The total return that a
trading platform earns reflects the revenues it receives from both
products and the joint costs it incurs. Moreover, an exchange's broker-
dealer customers view the costs of transaction executions and market
data as a unified cost of doing business with the exchange.
Analyzing the cost of market data product production and
distribution in isolation from the cost of all of the inputs supporting
the creation of market data and market data products will inevitably
underestimate the cost of the data and data products. Thus, because it
is impossible to obtain the data inputs to create market data products
without a fast, technologically robust, and well-regulated execution
system, system costs and regulatory costs affect the price of both
obtaining the market data itself and creating and distributing market
data products. It would be equally misleading, however, to attribute
all of an exchange's costs to the market data portion of an exchange's
joint products. Rather, all of an exchange's costs are incurred for the
unified purposes of attracting order flow, executing and/or routing
orders, and generating and selling data about market activity. The
total return that an exchange earns reflects the revenues it receives
from the joint products and the total costs of the joint products.
The level of competition and contestability in the market is
evident in the numerous alternative venues that compete for order flow,
including 15 options self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') markets, as
well as internalizing broker-dealers (``BDs'') and various forms of
alternative trading systems (``ATSs''), including dark pools and
electronic communication networks (``ECNs''). Competition among trading
platforms can be expected to constrain the aggregate return that each
platform earns from the sale of its joint products, but different
platforms may choose from a range of possible, and equally reasonable,
pricing strategies as the means of recovering total costs. For example,
some platforms may choose to pay rebates to attract orders, charge
relatively low prices for market data products (or provide market data
products free of charge), and charge relatively high prices for
accessing posted liquidity. Other platforms may choose a strategy of
paying lower rebates (or no rebates) to attract orders, setting
relatively high prices for market data products, and setting relatively
low prices for accessing posted liquidity. In this environment, there
is no economic basis for regulating maximum prices for one of the joint
products in an industry in which suppliers face competitive constraints
with regard to the joint offering.
The Existence of Alternatives. The Exchange is constrained in
pricing the BBO, Book Depth and COB Data Feeds by the availability to
market participants of alternatives to purchasing these products. The
Exchange must consider the extent to which market participants would
choose one or more alternatives instead of purchasing the exchange's
data. Other options exchanges can and have produced their own top-of-
book, book depth and complex strategies market data products, and thus
are sources of potential competition for CDS. For example, as noted
above, ISE and PHLX offer market data products that compete with the
BBO, Book Depth and COB Data Feeds. The large number of SROs, BDs, and
ATSs that currently produce proprietary data or are currently capable
of producing it provides further pricing discipline for proprietary
data products. Each SRO, ATS, and BD is currently permitted to produce
proprietary data products, and many currently do. In addition, the OPRA
data feed is a significant competitive alternative to the BBO and
[[Page 6279]]
last sale data included in the BBO and Book Depth Data Feeds.
The existence of numerous alternatives to the Exchange's products,
including proprietary data from other sources, ensures that the
Exchange cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably
discriminatory, when vendors and subscribers can elect these
alternatives or choose not to purchase a specific proprietary data
product if its cost to purchase is not justified by the returns any
particular vendor or subscriber would achieve through the purchase.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \23\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2018-002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2018-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-C2-2018-002 and should be submitted on
or before March 6, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02858 Filed 2-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
