Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees To Modify Complex Order Fees and Rebates, 6069-6071 [2018-02727]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 2018 / Notices
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–IEX–2018–02, and should
be submitted on or before March 5,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.52
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02720 Filed 2–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–82644; File No. SR–ISE–
2018–10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Schedule of Fees To
Modify Complex Order Fees and
Rebates
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
February 6, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
30, 2018, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
52 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
19:23 Feb 09, 2018
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s Schedule of Fees.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Jkt 244001
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees to modify certain
complex order fees and rebates in
Section II, and to make a number of
non-substantive changes to update
certain section headings. Each change is
described below.3
Priority Customer Complex Order
Rebate for Select Symbols
Currently as set forth in Section II of
the Schedule of Fees, the Exchange
provides rebates to Priority Customer 4
complex orders that trade with NonPriority Customer 5 complex orders in
the complex order book or trade with
quotes and orders on the regular order
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed
pricing changes on January 2, 2018 (SR–ISE–2018–
02). On January 11, 2018, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and submitted SR–ISE–2018–05. On
January 22, 2018, the Exchange withdrew SR–ISE–
2018–05 and submitted SR–ISE–2018–08. On
January 30, 2018, the Exchange withdrew SR–ISE–
2018–08 and submitted this filing.
4 A ‘‘Priority Customer’’ is a person or entity that
is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does not
place more than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s), as defined in ISE Rule
100(a)(37A).
5 Non-Priority Customer includes Market Maker,
Non-Nasdaq GEMX Market Maker, Firm
Proprietary, Broker-Dealer, and Professional
Customer.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6069
book. Rebates are tiered based on a
member’s average daily volume
(‘‘ADV’’) executed during a given month
as follows: 0 to 14,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
1’’), 15,000 to 44,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
2’’), 45,000 to 59,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
3’’), 60,000 to 74,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
4’’), 75,000 to 99,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
5’’), 100,000 to 124,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
6’’), 125,000 to 224,999 contracts (‘‘Tier
7’’), and 225,000 or more contracts
(‘‘Tier 8’’). In Select Symbols,6 the
rebate is $0.26 per contract for Tier 1,
$0.30 per contract for Tier 2, $0.36 per
contract for Tier 3, $0.41 per contract for
Tier 4, $0.42 per contract for Tier 5,
$0.44 per contract for Tier 6, $0.46 per
contract for Tier 7, and $0.49 per
contract for Tier 8. The Exchange now
proposes to increase the rebate amounts
to $0.45 in Tier 6 and $0.50 in Tier 8.
Non-Priority Customer Complex Order
Taker Fee for Select Symbols
Currently, the Exchange charges a
complex order taker fee for Select
Symbols that is $0.47 per contract for
Market Maker 7 orders (or $0.44 per
contract for Market Makers with total
affiliated Priority Customer Complex
ADV of 150,000 or more contracts),8 and
$0.48 per contract for Non-Nasdaq ISE
Market Maker,9 Firm Proprietary 10/
Broker-Dealer,11 and Professional
Customer 12 orders. Priority Customer
orders are not charged a complex order
taker fee for Select Symbols. The
Exchange now proposes to increase the
complex order taker fee to $0.50 per
contract for Non-Priority Customer
orders in Select Symbols. As proposed,
Market Makers with total affiliated
Priority Customer Complex ADV of
6 ‘‘Select Symbols’’ are options overlying all
symbols listed on ISE that are in the Penny Pilot
Program.
7 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively.
8 Nasdaq ISE Market Makers making or taking
liquidity receive a discount of $0.02 when trading
against Priority Customer orders preferenced to
them in the Complex Order Book in equity options
that are able to be listed and traded on more than
one options exchange. This discount does not apply
to FX Options Symbols or to option classes
designated by the Exchange to receive a guaranteed
allocation pursuant to Nasdaq ISE Rule
722(b)(3)(i)(B).
9 A ‘‘Non-Nasdaq ISE Market Maker’’ is a market
maker as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
registered in the same options class on another
options exchange.
10 A ‘‘Firm Proprietary’’ order is an order
submitted by a member for its own proprietary
account.
11 A ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ order is an order submitted
by a member for a broker-dealer account that is not
its own proprietary account.
12 A ‘‘Professional Customer’’ is a person or entity
that is not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority
Customer.
E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM
12FEN1
6070
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 2018 / Notices
150,000 or more contracts will continue
to receive the discounted fee of $0.44.
Additionally, preferenced Market
Makers will continue to receive the
applicable discount of $0.02 per
contract when trading against Priority
Customer order preferenced to them in
the complex order book.13
Non-Priority Customer Complex
Surcharge for Non-Select Symbols
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section II of the Schedule of Fees to
adopt a surcharge of $0.03 per contract
on Non-Priority Customer complex
orders in Non-Select Symbols 14 that
take liquidity from the complex order
book. For clarification, the proposed
Non-Priority Customer complex
surcharge will not apply to orders
executed or submitted in the Exchange’s
various auction mechanisms.15
Update Fee Schedule Headings
Currently, the Exchange’s Schedule of
Fees contains a number of section
headings that are not currently reflected
in the Table of Contents. The Exchange
added or eliminated these headings as
parts of previous rule changes, and
inadvertently did not make the
corresponding updates to the Table of
Contents.16 Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to update the Table of
Contents to make its Schedule of Fees
easier to read. The Exchange also
proposes to renumber Section VIII.J to
Section VIII.K in connection with these
clean-up changes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,17 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,18 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among members and issuers and other
13 See
note 8 above.
Symbols’’ are options overlying all
symbols excluding Select Symbols.
15 Today, the complex order auctions consist of
the Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order
Mechanism, Price Improvement Mechanism and
‘‘exposure’’ auctions pursuant to ISE Rule
722(b)(3)(iii).
16 In particular, the Exchange deleted Sections
V.C, VI.B, and VII.D, and added Sections V.D, VI.C,
VI.E–VI.I, and VIII.J as parts of previous rule
changes to amend ISE’s Schedule of Fees. See
Securities Exchange Release No. 68324 (November
30, 2012), 77 FR 72901 (December 6, 2012) (SR–
ISE–2012–89); Securities Exchange Release No.
81095 (July 7, 2017), 82 FR 32409 (July 13, 2017)
(SR–ISE–2017–62); Securities Exchange Release No.
81903 (October 19, 2017), 82 FR 49450 (October 25,
2017) (SR–ISE–2017–91); and Securities Exchange
Release No. 82446 (January 5, 2018), 83 FR 1446
(January 11, 2018) (SR–ISE–2017–112).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
14 ‘‘Non-Select
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Feb 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
Priority Customer Complex Order
Rebate for Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to increase the rebates
provided to Priority Customer complex
orders in the manner discussed above,
as these proposed rebates are designed
to attract additional Priority Customer
complex order volume to the Exchange.
The Exchange already provides volumebased tiered rebates for Priority
Customer complex orders, and believes
that increasing the rebates will
incentivize members to send additional
order flow to ISE in order to achieve
these rebates for their Priority Customer
complex order volume, creating
additional liquidity to the benefit of all
members that trade complex orders on
the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that Priority
Customer orders will continue to
receive complex order rebates,19 while
other market participants will continue
to pay a fee. The Exchange does not
believe that this is unfairly
discriminatory as a Priority Customer is
by definition not a broker or dealer in
securities, and does not place more than
390 orders in listed options per day on
average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s). This
limitation does not apply to participants
whose behavior is substantially similar
to that of market professionals,
including Professional Customers, who
will generally submit a higher number
of orders (many of which do not result
in executions) than Priority Customers.
Non-Priority Customer Complex Order
Taker Fee for Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to increase the complex
order taker fee to $0.50 per contract for
Non-Priority Customer orders in Select
Symbols because the increased taker
fees are designed to offset the enhanced
Priority Customer rebates discussed
above. Furthermore, the proposed taker
fees are set at levels that the Exchange
believes will continue to be attractive to
market participants that trade on ISE. As
noted above, Market Makers with total
affiliated Priority Customer Complex
ADV of 150,000 or more contracts will
continue to receive the discounted fee of
$0.44 under this proposal. Additionally,
preferenced Market Makers will
continue to receive the applicable
19 With the exception of responses to complex
crossing orders, including complex PIM orders,
where Priority Customers are charged a fee like
other market participants.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discount of $0.02 per contract when
trading against Priority Customer order
preferenced to them in the complex
order book.20
The Exchange’s proposal to increase
the Non-Priority Customer complex
order taker fee is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the
increased fee will apply to all similarlysituated market participants. As noted
above, Priority Customers will continue
to receive complex order rebates, while
other market participants will continue
to pay a fee. The Exchange does not
believe that this is unfairly
discriminatory for the reasons discussed
above. The Exchange also notes that
Market Maker orders will continue to be
eligible for lower fees than other nonPriority Customer orders. The Exchange
does not believe that it is unfairly
discriminatory provide lower fees to
Market Maker orders as Market Makers
are subject to additional requirements
and obligations (such as quoting
requirements) that other market
participants are not.
Non-Priority Customer Complex
Surcharge for Non-Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to adopt a surcharge of $0.03
per contract on Non-Priority Customer
complex orders in Non-Select Symbols
that take liquidity from the complex
order book is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory. Assessing
this surcharge to only those orders that
take liquidity from the market is
reasonable because the Exchange wants
to continue to encourage market
participation for those participants that
seek to add liquidity on ISE. In addition,
the Exchange believes that excluding
complex orders executed in the
Exchange’s various auction mechanisms
from the proposed Non-Priority
Customer complex surcharge is
reasonable for the reasons that follow.
The proposed complex surcharge will
not apply to complex orders executed in
the Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited
Order Mechanism and Price
Improvement Mechanism as such orders
have separate pricing in Section II of the
Schedule of Fees, and the Exchange
wants to continue to encourage
participation within these auction
mechanisms. The Exchange also
believes that the exclusion of
‘‘exposure’’ auctions pursuant to ISE
Rule 722(b)(3)(iii) from the Non-Priority
Customer complex surcharge is
reasonable because the Exchange wants
to encourage participation in this
auction and have it continue to be
attractive to market participants who
20 See
E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM
note 8 above.
12FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 2018 / Notices
will be assessed the lower fee. The
Exchange believes that the complex fee
structure as proposed will remain
attractive to market participants, who
will continue to be charged lower fees
for adding liquidity to the complex
order book than for removing liquidity.
ISE notes that other options exchanges
assess similar surcharges on complex
orders that remove liquidity from the
complex order book.21
The Exchange’s proposal to adopt the
$0.03 per contract Non-Priority
Customer complex order surcharge in
the manner discussed above is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because
the surcharge will apply to all similarlysituated market participants.
Update Fee Schedule Headings
The Exchange believes that the cleanup changes to update the section
headings in its Schedule of Fees is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because these are nonsubstantive changes intended to make
the Schedule of Fees more transparent
to members and investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed fees and rebates are designed
to attract additional order flow to ISE,
and the Exchange believes that its
complex order pricing remains
attractive to market participants. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or
rebate opportunities available at other
venues to be more favorable. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually adjust its fees to remain
competitive with other exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify
their own fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
21 Nasdaq PHLX (‘‘Phlx’’), CBOE Options
(‘‘CBOE’’), and MIAX Options (‘‘MIAX’’) assess
similar surcharges for complex order executions
that remove liquidity from the complex order book
for non-penny classes. See Phlx Pricing Schedule,
Section II, note 7; CBOE Fees Schedule, Complex
Surcharge, and note 35; and MIAX Fee Schedule,
Sections (1)(a)(i) and (ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Feb 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,22 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 23 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2018–10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2018–10. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2018–10 and should be
submitted on or before March 5, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02727 Filed 2–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82643; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2017–012]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To List and Trade
Shares of the LHA Market State®
Tactical U.S. Equity ETF, a Series of
the ETF Series Solutions, Under Rule
14.11(i), Managed Fund Shares
February 6, 2018.
On December 7, 2017, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to list and trade the shares of the
LHA Market State® Tactical U.S. Equity
ETF (‘‘Fund’’) under BZX Rule 14.11(i).
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
24 17
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6071
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM
12FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6069-6071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02727]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82644; File No. SR-ISE-2018-10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange's Schedule of Fees To Modify Complex Order Fees and Rebates
February 6, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 30, 2018, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
Schedule of Fees to modify certain complex order fees and rebates in
Section II, and to make a number of non-substantive changes to update
certain section headings. Each change is described below.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing changes on
January 2, 2018 (SR-ISE-2018-02). On January 11, 2018, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted SR-ISE-2018-05. On January 22,
2018, the Exchange withdrew SR-ISE-2018-05 and submitted SR-ISE-
2018-08. On January 30, 2018, the Exchange withdrew SR-ISE-2018-08
and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority Customer Complex Order Rebate for Select Symbols
Currently as set forth in Section II of the Schedule of Fees, the
Exchange provides rebates to Priority Customer \4\ complex orders that
trade with Non-Priority Customer \5\ complex orders in the complex
order book or trade with quotes and orders on the regular order book.
Rebates are tiered based on a member's average daily volume (``ADV'')
executed during a given month as follows: 0 to 14,999 contracts (``Tier
1''), 15,000 to 44,999 contracts (``Tier 2''), 45,000 to 59,999
contracts (``Tier 3''), 60,000 to 74,999 contracts (``Tier 4''), 75,000
to 99,999 contracts (``Tier 5''), 100,000 to 124,999 contracts (``Tier
6''), 125,000 to 224,999 contracts (``Tier 7''), and 225,000 or more
contracts (``Tier 8''). In Select Symbols,\6\ the rebate is $0.26 per
contract for Tier 1, $0.30 per contract for Tier 2, $0.36 per contract
for Tier 3, $0.41 per contract for Tier 4, $0.42 per contract for Tier
5, $0.44 per contract for Tier 6, $0.46 per contract for Tier 7, and
$0.49 per contract for Tier 8. The Exchange now proposes to increase
the rebate amounts to $0.45 in Tier 6 and $0.50 in Tier 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A ``Priority Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s), as defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(37A).
\5\ Non-Priority Customer includes Market Maker, Non-Nasdaq GEMX
Market Maker, Firm Proprietary, Broker-Dealer, and Professional
Customer.
\6\ ``Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols listed
on ISE that are in the Penny Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Priority Customer Complex Order Taker Fee for Select Symbols
Currently, the Exchange charges a complex order taker fee for
Select Symbols that is $0.47 per contract for Market Maker \7\ orders
(or $0.44 per contract for Market Makers with total affiliated Priority
Customer Complex ADV of 150,000 or more contracts),\8\ and $0.48 per
contract for Non-Nasdaq ISE Market Maker,\9\ Firm Proprietary \10\/
Broker-Dealer,\11\ and Professional Customer \12\ orders. Priority
Customer orders are not charged a complex order taker fee for Select
Symbols. The Exchange now proposes to increase the complex order taker
fee to $0.50 per contract for Non-Priority Customer orders in Select
Symbols. As proposed, Market Makers with total affiliated Priority
Customer Complex ADV of
[[Page 6070]]
150,000 or more contracts will continue to receive the discounted fee
of $0.44. Additionally, preferenced Market Makers will continue to
receive the applicable discount of $0.02 per contract when trading
against Priority Customer order preferenced to them in the complex
order book.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively.
\8\ Nasdaq ISE Market Makers making or taking liquidity receive
a discount of $0.02 when trading against Priority Customer orders
preferenced to them in the Complex Order Book in equity options that
are able to be listed and traded on more than one options exchange.
This discount does not apply to FX Options Symbols or to option
classes designated by the Exchange to receive a guaranteed
allocation pursuant to Nasdaq ISE Rule 722(b)(3)(i)(B).
\9\ A ``Non-Nasdaq ISE Market Maker'' is a market maker as
defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, registered in the same options class on another options
exchange.
\10\ A ``Firm Proprietary'' order is an order submitted by a
member for its own proprietary account.
\11\ A ``Broker-Dealer'' order is an order submitted by a member
for a broker-dealer account that is not its own proprietary account.
\12\ A ``Professional Customer'' is a person or entity that is
not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority Customer.
\13\ See note 8 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Priority Customer Complex Surcharge for Non-Select Symbols
The Exchange proposes to amend Section II of the Schedule of Fees
to adopt a surcharge of $0.03 per contract on Non-Priority Customer
complex orders in Non-Select Symbols \14\ that take liquidity from the
complex order book. For clarification, the proposed Non-Priority
Customer complex surcharge will not apply to orders executed or
submitted in the Exchange's various auction mechanisms.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ``Non-Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols
excluding Select Symbols.
\15\ Today, the complex order auctions consist of the
Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order Mechanism, Price Improvement
Mechanism and ``exposure'' auctions pursuant to ISE Rule
722(b)(3)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Fee Schedule Headings
Currently, the Exchange's Schedule of Fees contains a number of
section headings that are not currently reflected in the Table of
Contents. The Exchange added or eliminated these headings as parts of
previous rule changes, and inadvertently did not make the corresponding
updates to the Table of Contents.\16\ Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to update the Table of Contents to make its Schedule of Fees
easier to read. The Exchange also proposes to renumber Section VIII.J
to Section VIII.K in connection with these clean-up changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ In particular, the Exchange deleted Sections V.C, VI.B, and
VII.D, and added Sections V.D, VI.C, VI.E-VI.I, and VIII.J as parts
of previous rule changes to amend ISE's Schedule of Fees. See
Securities Exchange Release No. 68324 (November 30, 2012), 77 FR
72901 (December 6, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-89); Securities Exchange
Release No. 81095 (July 7, 2017), 82 FR 32409 (July 13, 2017) (SR-
ISE-2017-62); Securities Exchange Release No. 81903 (October 19,
2017), 82 FR 49450 (October 25, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-91); and
Securities Exchange Release No. 82446 (January 5, 2018), 83 FR 1446
(January 11, 2018) (SR-ISE-2017-112).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority Customer Complex Order Rebate for Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to increase the rebates
provided to Priority Customer complex orders in the manner discussed
above, as these proposed rebates are designed to attract additional
Priority Customer complex order volume to the Exchange. The Exchange
already provides volume-based tiered rebates for Priority Customer
complex orders, and believes that increasing the rebates will
incentivize members to send additional order flow to ISE in order to
achieve these rebates for their Priority Customer complex order volume,
creating additional liquidity to the benefit of all members that trade
complex orders on the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that Priority Customer orders will continue to
receive complex order rebates,\19\ while other market participants will
continue to pay a fee. The Exchange does not believe that this is
unfairly discriminatory as a Priority Customer is by definition not a
broker or dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s). This limitation does not apply to
participants whose behavior is substantially similar to that of market
professionals, including Professional Customers, who will generally
submit a higher number of orders (many of which do not result in
executions) than Priority Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ With the exception of responses to complex crossing orders,
including complex PIM orders, where Priority Customers are charged a
fee like other market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Priority Customer Complex Order Taker Fee for Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to increase the complex
order taker fee to $0.50 per contract for Non-Priority Customer orders
in Select Symbols because the increased taker fees are designed to
offset the enhanced Priority Customer rebates discussed above.
Furthermore, the proposed taker fees are set at levels that the
Exchange believes will continue to be attractive to market participants
that trade on ISE. As noted above, Market Makers with total affiliated
Priority Customer Complex ADV of 150,000 or more contracts will
continue to receive the discounted fee of $0.44 under this proposal.
Additionally, preferenced Market Makers will continue to receive the
applicable discount of $0.02 per contract when trading against Priority
Customer order preferenced to them in the complex order book.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See note 8 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to increase the Non-Priority Customer
complex order taker fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the increased fee will apply to all similarly-situated market
participants. As noted above, Priority Customers will continue to
receive complex order rebates, while other market participants will
continue to pay a fee. The Exchange does not believe that this is
unfairly discriminatory for the reasons discussed above. The Exchange
also notes that Market Maker orders will continue to be eligible for
lower fees than other non-Priority Customer orders. The Exchange does
not believe that it is unfairly discriminatory provide lower fees to
Market Maker orders as Market Makers are subject to additional
requirements and obligations (such as quoting requirements) that other
market participants are not.
Non-Priority Customer Complex Surcharge for Non-Select Symbols
The Exchange believes that its proposal to adopt a surcharge of
$0.03 per contract on Non-Priority Customer complex orders in Non-
Select Symbols that take liquidity from the complex order book is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. Assessing this
surcharge to only those orders that take liquidity from the market is
reasonable because the Exchange wants to continue to encourage market
participation for those participants that seek to add liquidity on ISE.
In addition, the Exchange believes that excluding complex orders
executed in the Exchange's various auction mechanisms from the proposed
Non-Priority Customer complex surcharge is reasonable for the reasons
that follow. The proposed complex surcharge will not apply to complex
orders executed in the Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order
Mechanism and Price Improvement Mechanism as such orders have separate
pricing in Section II of the Schedule of Fees, and the Exchange wants
to continue to encourage participation within these auction mechanisms.
The Exchange also believes that the exclusion of ``exposure'' auctions
pursuant to ISE Rule 722(b)(3)(iii) from the Non-Priority Customer
complex surcharge is reasonable because the Exchange wants to encourage
participation in this auction and have it continue to be attractive to
market participants who
[[Page 6071]]
will be assessed the lower fee. The Exchange believes that the complex
fee structure as proposed will remain attractive to market
participants, who will continue to be charged lower fees for adding
liquidity to the complex order book than for removing liquidity. ISE
notes that other options exchanges assess similar surcharges on complex
orders that remove liquidity from the complex order book.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Nasdaq PHLX (``Phlx''), CBOE Options (``CBOE''), and MIAX
Options (``MIAX'') assess similar surcharges for complex order
executions that remove liquidity from the complex order book for
non-penny classes. See Phlx Pricing Schedule, Section II, note 7;
CBOE Fees Schedule, Complex Surcharge, and note 35; and MIAX Fee
Schedule, Sections (1)(a)(i) and (ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to adopt the $0.03 per contract Non-
Priority Customer complex order surcharge in the manner discussed above
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the surcharge will
apply to all similarly-situated market participants.
Update Fee Schedule Headings
The Exchange believes that the clean-up changes to update the
section headings in its Schedule of Fees is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because these are non-substantive changes
intended to make the Schedule of Fees more transparent to members and
investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed fees and rebates
are designed to attract additional order flow to ISE, and the Exchange
believes that its complex order pricing remains attractive to market
participants. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in
which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate
opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such
an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain
competitive with other exchanges. Because competitors are free to
modify their own fees in response, and because market participants may
readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes
that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely limited.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\22\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \23\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2018-10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2018-10. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2018-10 and should be submitted on
or before March 5, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02727 Filed 2-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P