Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; Notice of Application, 5148-5151 [2018-02168]
Download as PDF
5148
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
U.S.C. 6622 to direct the National
Science and Technology Council
(NSTC) to develop and update, in
coordination with the National
Economic Council, a strategic plan to
improve government coordination and
provide long-term guidance for Federal
programs and activities in support of
United States manufacturing
competitiveness, including advanced
manufacturing research and
development (R&D). Pursuant to this
requirement, NSTC seeks to develop a
National Strategic Plan for Advanced
Manufacturing (‘‘Plan’’) that will create
jobs, grow the economy across multiple
industrial sectors, strengthen national
security, and improve healthcare.
Advanced manufacturing refers to a
family of activities relating to the use
and coordination of information,
automation, computation, software,
sensing, networking, and
interoperability to manufacture existing
products in new ways, or to
manufacture new products emerging
from the use of new technologies.
NSTC has commenced the
development of the Plan and, pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 6622, is soliciting public
input through this RFI to obtain
recommendations from a wide range of
stakeholders, including representatives
from diverse manufacturing companies,
academia, and other relevant
organizations and institutions. The
public input provided in response to
this RFI will inform OSTP and NSTC as
they work with Federal agencies and
other stakeholders to develop the Plan.
Questions To Inform Development of
the Plan
Through this RFI, OSTP seeks
responses to the following questions to
improve government coordination and
provide long-term guidance for Federal
programs and activities in support of
United States manufacturing
competitiveness, including advanced
manufacturing R&D. Responses should
clearly indicate which question(s) is
being addressed.
1. In priority order, what should be
the near-term and long-term objectives
for advanced manufacturing, including
R&D objectives, the anticipated time
frame for achieving the objectives, and
the metrics for use in assessing progress
toward the objectives?
2. How can Federal agencies and
federally funded R&D centers
supporting advanced manufacturing
R&D foster the transfer of R&D results
into new manufacturing technologies
and United States-based manufacturing
of new products and processes for the
benefit of society to ensure national,
energy, and economic security? What
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
role can public-private partnerships
play, and how should they be structured
for maximum impact?
3. What innovative tools, platforms,
technologies are needed for advances in
manufacturing? Of those that already
exist, what are the barriers to their
adoption?
4. How can such Federal agencies and
centers develop and strengthen all
levels of manufacturing education and
training programs to ensure an
adequate, well-trained U.S. workforce
for the new advanced manufacturing
jobs of the future?
5. How can such Federal agencies and
centers assist small and medium-sized
manufacturers in developing and
implementing new products and
processes?
6. How would you assess the state of
the following factors and how they
impact innovation and competitiveness
for United States advanced
manufacturing?
(a) technology transfer and
commercialization activities;
(b) the adequacy of the national
security industrial base;
(c) the capabilities of the domestic
manufacturing workforce;
(d) export opportunities and trade
policies;
(e) financing, investment, and
taxation policies and practices;
(f) federal regulations;
(g) emerging technologies and
markets;
(h) advanced manufacturing research
and development undertaken by
competing nations; and
(i) the capabilities of the
manufacturing workforce of competing
nations.
7. Is there any additional information
related to advanced manufacturing in
the United Stated, not requested above,
that you believe OSTP should consider?
Dated: January 30, 2018.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 2018–02160 Filed 2–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270–F8–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 4850;
File No. 803–00243]
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; Notice
of Application
January 30, 2018.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
exemptive order under section 206A of
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’) providing an
exemption from the written disclosure
and consent requirements of section
206(3).
Janney Montgomery Scott
LLC (‘‘Applicant’’).
RELEVANT ADVISERS ACT SECTIONS:
Exemption requested under section
206A from the written disclosure and
consent requirements of section 206(3).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The
Applicant requests that the Commission
issue an order under section 206A
exempting it and Future Advisers (as
defined below) from the written
disclosure and consent requirements of
section 206(3) with respect to principal
transactions with nondiscretionary
advisory client accounts.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on November 22, 2017.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving the
Applicant with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on February 26, 2018, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicant, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under
the Advisers Act, hearing requests
should state the nature of the writer’s
interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter,
the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicant, c/o Laura E. Flores and
Monica L. Parry, Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP, 1111 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura L. Solomon, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551–6915, or Robert Shapiro,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website at https://www.sec.gov/rules/
iareleases.shtml or by calling (202) 551–
8090.
The Applicant seeks relief from the
written disclosure and consent
APPLICANT:
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Notices
requirements of section 206(3) of the
Advisers Act that would be similar to
relief provided by Advisers Act rule
206(3)-3T (the ‘‘Rule’’), which expired
by its terms on December 31, 2016. The
relief sought by the Applicant, if
granted, would be subject to conditions
similar to those under the Rule, as well
as certain revised or additional
conditions.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Applicant’s Representations
1. The Applicant is registered as an
investment adviser with the
Commission and is a registered brokerdealer. The Applicant offers the Partners
Advisory Program (the ‘‘Program’’), a
nondiscretionary advisory program.
2. The Applicant established the
Program in 1999. Prior to December 31,
2016, the Applicant relied on the Rule
to engage in principal transactions with
its clients in the Program.
3. As of December 31, 2016, the
Applicant had a total of 23,428 client
accounts enrolled in the Program with
aggregate assets of $7,318,704,000. On
the same date, 1,491 client accounts had
consented to principal transactions in
their Program accounts in reliance on
the Rule. In 2016, 4,527 trades were
effected in reliance on the Rule in the
Program. Approximately 90 percent of
the trades done in reliance on the Rule
in this period were purchases by client
accounts; the average purchase was
approximately $29,228. Approximately
10 percent of the trades done in reliance
on the Rule in this period were sales
from client accounts; the average sale
was approximately $30,011.
4. The Applicant acknowledges that
the Order, if granted, would not be
construed as relieving in any way the
Applicant from acting in the best
interests of an advisory client, including
fulfilling the duty to seek the best
execution for the particular transaction
for the advisory client; nor shall it
relieve the Applicant from any
obligation that may be imposed by
sections 206(1) or (2) of the Advisers
Act or by other applicable provisions of
the federal securities laws or applicable
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’) rules.
Applicant’s Legal Analysis
1. Section 206(3) provides that it is
unlawful for any investment adviser,
directly or indirectly, acting as principal
for its own account, knowingly to sell
any security to or purchase any security
from a client, without disclosing to the
client in writing before the completion
of the transaction the capacity in which
the adviser is acting and obtaining the
client’s consent to the transaction. The
Rule deemed an investment adviser to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
be in compliance with the provisions of
section 206(3) of the Advisers Act when
the investment adviser, or a person
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the investment
adviser, acting as principal for its own
account, sold to or purchased from an
advisory client any security, provided
that the investment adviser complied
with the conditions of the Rule.
2. The Rule required, among other
things, that the investment adviser
obtain a client’s written, revocable
consent prospectively authorizing the
adviser, directly or indirectly, acting as
principal for its own account, to sell any
security to or purchase any security
from the client. The consent was
required to be obtained after the adviser
provided the client with written
disclosure about: (i) The circumstances
under which the investment adviser
may engage in principal transactions
with the client; (ii) the nature and
significance of the conflicts the
investment adviser has with its client’s
interests as a result of those
transactions; and (iii) how the
investment adviser addresses those
conflicts. The investment adviser also
was required to provide trade-by-trade
disclosure to the client, before the
execution of each principal transaction,
of the capacity in which the adviser may
act with respect to the transaction, and
obtain the client’s consent (which may
be written or oral) to the transaction.
The Rule was available only to an
investment adviser that was also a
broker-dealer registered under section
15 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) and could only
be relied upon with respect to a
nondiscretionary account that was a
brokerage account subject to the
Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder,
and the rules of the self-regulatory
organization(s) of which it is a member.
The Rule was not available for principal
transactions if the investment adviser or
a person who controlled, was controlled
by, or was under common control with
the adviser (‘‘control person’’) was the
issuer or an underwriter of the security
(except that an investment adviser could
rely on the Rule for trades in which the
investment adviser or a control person
was an underwriter of non-convertible
investment-grade debt securities).
3. The Rule also required the
investment adviser to provide to the
client a trade confirmation that, in
addition to the requirements of rule
10b–10 under the Exchange Act,
included a conspicuous, plain English
statement informing the client that the
investment adviser disclosed to the
client before the execution of the
transaction that the investment adviser
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5149
may act as principal in connection with
the transaction, that the client
authorized the transaction, and that the
investment adviser sold the security to
or bought the security from the client for
its own account. The investment adviser
also was required to deliver to the
client, at least annually, a written
statement listing all transactions that
were executed in the account in reliance
on the Rule, including the date and
price of each transaction.
4. The Rule expired on December 31,
2016. Absent the requested relief, the
Applicant would be required to provide
trade-by-trade written disclosure to each
nondiscretionary advisory client with
whom the Applicant sought to engage in
a principal transaction in accordance
with section 206(3). The Applicant
submits that its nondiscretionary clients
have had access to the Applicant’s
inventory through principal transactions
with the Applicant for a number of
years, and expect to continue to have
such access in the future. The Applicant
believes that engaging in principal
transactions with its clients provides
certain benefits to its clients, including
access to securities of limited
availability, such as municipal bonds,
and that the written disclosure and
client consent requirements of section
206(3) act as an operational barrier to its
ability to engage in principal trades with
its clients, especially when the
transaction involves securities of
limited availability.
5. Unless the Applicant is provided
an exemption from the written
disclosure and client consent
requirements of section 206(3), the
Applicant believes that it will be unable
to provide the same range of services
and access to the same types of
securities to its nondiscretionary
advisory clients as it was able to provide
to its clients under the Rule.
6. The Applicant notes that, if the
requested relief is granted, it will
remain subject to the fiduciary duties
that are generally enforceable under
sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the
Advisers Act, which, in general terms,
require the Applicant to: (i) Disclose
material facts about the advisory
relationship to its clients; (ii) treat each
client fairly; and (iii) act only in the best
interests of its client, disclosing
conflicts of interest when present and
obtaining client consent to arrangements
that present such conflicts.
7. The Applicant further notes that, in
its capacity as a broker-dealer with
respect to these accounts, it will remain
subject to a comprehensive set of
Commission and FINRA regulations that
apply to the relationship between a
broker-dealer and its customer in
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
5150
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Notices
addition to the fiduciary duties an
adviser owes a client. These rules
require, among other things, that the
Applicant deal fairly with its customers,
seek to obtain best execution of
customer orders, and make only suitable
recommendations. These obligations are
designed to promote business conduct
that protects customers from abusive
practices that may not necessarily be
fraudulent, and to protect against unfair
prices and excessive commissions.
Specifically, these provisions, among
other things, require that the prices
charged by the Applicant be reasonably
related to the prevailing market, and
limit the commissions and mark-ups the
Applicant can charge. Additionally,
these obligations require that the
Applicant have a reasonable basis to
believe that a recommended transaction
or investment strategy involving a
security or securities is suitable for the
customer, based on information
obtained through reasonable diligence.
8. The Applicant requests that the
Commission issue an Order pursuant to
section 206A exempting it from the
written disclosure and consent
requirements of section 206(3) only with
respect to client accounts in the
Program and any similar
nondiscretionary program to be created
in the future. The Applicant also
requests that the Commission’s Order
apply to future investment advisers
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Applicant
(‘‘Future Advisers’’). Any Future
Adviser relying on any Order granted
pursuant to the application will comply
with the terms and conditions stated in
the application.1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Applicant’s Conditions
The Applicant agrees that any Order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Applicant will exercise no
‘‘investment discretion’’ (as such term is
defined in section 3(a)(35) of the
Exchange Act), except investment
discretion granted by the advisory client
on a temporary or limited basis,2 with
respect to the client’s account.
1 All entities that currently intend to rely on any
order granted pursuant to the application are named
as Applicants.
2 Discretion is considered to be temporary or
limited for purposes of this condition when the
investment adviser is given discretion: (i) As to the
price at which or the time to execute an order given
by a client for the purchase or sale of a definite
amount or quantity of a specified security; (ii) on
an isolated or infrequent basis, to purchase or sell
a security or type of security when a client is
unavailable for a limited period of time not to
exceed a few months; (iii) as to cash management,
such as to exchange a position in a money market
fund for another money market fund or cash
equivalent; (iv) to purchase or sell securities to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
2. The Applicant will not trade in
reliance on this Order any security for
which the Applicant or any person
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Applicant is
the issuer, or, at the time of the sale, an
underwriter (as defined in section
202(a)(20) of the Advisers Act).
3. The Applicant will not directly or
indirectly require the client to consent
to principal trading as a condition to
opening or maintaining an account with
the Applicant.
4. The advisory client has executed a
written revocable consent prospectively
authorizing the Applicant directly or
indirectly to act as principal for its own
account in selling any security to or
purchasing any security from the
advisory client. The advisory client’s
written consent must be obtained
through a signature or other positive
manifestation of consent that is separate
from or in addition to the signature
indicating the client’s consent to the
advisory agreement. The separate or
additional signature line or alternative
means of expressing consent must be
preceded immediately by prominent,
plain English disclosure containing
either: (a) An explanation of: (i) The
circumstances under which the
Applicant directly or indirectly may
engage in principal transactions; (ii) the
nature and significance of conflicts with
its client’s interests as a result of the
transactions; and (iii) how the Applicant
addresses those conflicts; or (b) a
statement explaining that the client is
consenting to principal transactions,
followed by a cross-reference to a
specific document provided to the client
containing the disclosure in (a)(i)–(iii)
above and to the specific page or pages
on which such disclosure is located;
provided, however, that if the Applicant
requires time to modify its electronic
systems to provide the specific page
cross-reference required by clause (b),
the Applicant may, while updating such
electronic systems, and for no more than
90 days from the date of the Order,
instead provide a cross-reference to a
specific document provided to the client
containing the disclosure in (a)(i)–(iii)
above and to the specific section in such
document in which such disclosure is
located.
Transition provision: To the extent
that the Applicant obtained fully
satisfy margin requirements; (v) to sell specific
bonds and purchase similar bonds in order to
permit a client to take a tax loss on the original
position; (vi) to purchase a bond with a specified
credit rating and maturity; and (vii) to purchase or
sell a security or type of security limited by specific
parameters established by the client. See, e.g.,
Temporary Rule Regarding Principal Trades with
Certain Advisory Clients, Investment Advisers Act
Release No. 2653 (Sept. 24, 2007) at n. 31.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
informed written revocable consent
from an advisory client for purposes of
rule 206(3)–3T(a)(3) prior to January 1,
2017, the Applicant may rely on this
Order with respect to such client
without obtaining additional
prospective consent from such client.
5. The Applicant, prior to the
execution of each transaction in reliance
on this Order, will: (a) Inform the
advisory client, orally or in writing, of
the capacity in which it may act with
respect to such transaction; and (b)
obtain consent from the advisory client,
orally or in writing, to act as principal
for its own account with respect to such
transaction.
6. The Applicant will send a written
confirmation at or before completion of
each such transaction that includes, in
addition to the information required by
rule 10b–10 under the Exchange Act, a
conspicuous, plain English statement
informing the advisory client that the
Applicant: (a) Disclosed to the client
prior to the execution of the transaction
that the Applicant may be acting in a
principal capacity in connection with
the transaction and the client authorized
the transaction; and (b) sold the security
to, or bought the security from, the
client for its own account.
7. The Applicant will send to the
client, no less frequently than annually,
written disclosure containing a list of all
transactions that were executed in the
client’s account in reliance upon this
Order, and the date and price of each
such transaction.
8. The Applicant is a broker-dealer
registered under section 15 of the
Exchange Act and each account for
which the Applicant relies on this Order
is a brokerage account subject to the
Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder,
and the rules of the self-regulatory
organization(s) of which it is a member.
9. Each written disclosure required as
a condition to this Order will include a
conspicuous, plain English statement
that the client may revoke the written
consent referred to in Condition 4 above
without penalty at any time by written
notice to the Applicant in accordance
with reasonable procedures established
by the Applicant, but in all cases such
revocation must be given effect within
5 business days of the Applicant’s
receipt thereof.
10. The Applicant will maintain
records sufficient to enable verification
of compliance with the conditions of
this Order. Such records will include,
without limitation: (a) Documentation
sufficient to demonstrate compliance
with each disclosure and consent
requirement under this Order; (b) in
particular, documentation sufficient to
demonstrate that, prior to the execution
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Notices
of each transaction in reliance on this
Order, the Applicant informed the
relevant advisory client of the capacity
in which the Applicant may act with
respect to the transaction and that it
received the advisory client’s consent (if
the Applicant informs the client orally
of the capacity in which it may act with
respect to such transaction or obtains
oral consent, such records may, for
example, include recordings of
telephone conversations or
contemporaneous written notations);
and (c) documentation sufficient to
enable assessment of compliance by the
Applicant with sections 206(1) and (2)
of the Advisers Act in connection with
its reliance on this Order.3 In each case,
such records will be maintained and
preserved in an easily accessible place
for a period of not less than five years,
the first two years in an appropriate
office of the Applicant, and be available
for inspection by the staff of the
Commission.
11. The Applicant will adopt written
compliance policies and procedures
reasonably designed to ensure, and the
Applicant’s chief compliance officer
will monitor, the Applicant’s
compliance with the conditions of this
Order. The Applicant’s chief
compliance officer will, on at least a
quarterly basis, conduct testing
reasonably sufficient to verify such
compliance. Such written policies and
procedures, monitoring and testing will
address, without limitation: (a)
Compliance by the Applicant with its
disclosure and consent requirements
under this Order; (b) the integrity and
operation of electronic systems
employed by the Applicant in
connection with its reliance on this
Order; (c) compliance by the Applicant
with its recordkeeping obligations under
this Order; and (d) whether there is any
evidence of the Applicant engaging in
‘‘dumping’’ in connection with its
reliance on this Order.4 The Applicant’s
chief compliance officer will document
the frequency and results of such
monitoring and testing, and the
Applicant will maintain and preserve
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
3 For
example, under sections 206(1) and (2), an
investment adviser may not engage in any
transaction on a principal basis with a client that
is not consistent with the best interests of the client
or that subrogates the client’s interests to the
interests of the investment adviser. Cf. Investment
Advisers Act Release No. 2106 (Jan. 31, 2003)
(adopting Rule 206(4)–6).
4 See Report of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Investment Trusts and Investment
Companies, H.R. Doc. No. 279, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.,
pt. 3, at 2581, 2589 (1939); Hearings on S. 3580
Before a Subcommittee of the Commission on
Banking and Currency, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. 209,
212–23 (1940); Hearings on S. 3580 Before the
Subcomm. of the Comm. on Banking and Currency,
76th Cong., 3d Sess. 322 (1940).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
such documentation in an easily
accessible place for a period of not less
than five years, the first two years in an
appropriate office of the Applicant, and
be available for inspection by the staff
of the Commission.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02168 Filed 2–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
32999; 812–14859]
Gadsden ETF Trust and Gadsden, LLC
January 30, 2018.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application for an order
under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) for an
exemption from sections 2(a)(32),
5(a)(1), 22(d), and 22(e) of the Act and
rule 22c–1 under the Act, under
sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for an
exemption from sections 17(a)(1) and
17(a)(2) of the Act, and under section
12(d)(1)(J) for an exemption from
sections 12(d)(1)(A) and 12(d)(1)(B) of
the Act. The requested order would
permit (a) actively-managed series of
certain open-end management
investment companies (‘‘Funds’’) to
issue shares redeemable in large
aggregations only (‘‘Creation Units’’); (b)
secondary market transactions in Fund
shares to occur at negotiated market
prices rather than at net asset value
(‘‘NAV’’); (c) certain Funds to pay
redemption proceeds, under certain
circumstances, more than seven days
after the tender of shares for
redemption; (d) certain affiliated
persons of a Fund to deposit securities
into, and receive securities from, the
Fund in connection with the purchase
and redemption of Creation Units; (e)
certain registered management
investment companies and unit
investment trusts outside of the same
group of investment companies as the
Funds (‘‘Funds of Funds’’) to acquire
shares of the Funds; and (f) certain
Funds (‘‘Feeder Funds’’) to create and
redeem Creation Units in-kind in a
master-feeder structure.
APPLICANTS: Gadsden ETF Trust
(‘‘Trust’’), a Delaware statutory trust that
will be registered under the Act as an
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5151
open-end management investment
company with multiple series, and
Gadsden, LLC (‘‘Initial Adviser’’), a
Delaware limited liability company that
will be registered as an investment
adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on December 26, 2017.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on February 23, 2018, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090;
Applicants: Eight Tower Bridge, 161
Washington Street, Suite 580,
Conshohocken, PA 19428.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce R. MacNeil, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551–6817, or David J. Marcinkus,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Summary of the Application
1. Applicants request an order that
would allow Funds to operate as
actively-managed exchange traded
funds (‘‘ETFs’’).1 Fund shares will be
1 Applicants request that the order apply to the
Initial Fund, as well as to future series of the Trust,
and any other open-end management investment
companies or series thereof (each, included in the
term ‘‘Fund’’), each of which will operate as an
actively-managed ETF. Any Fund will (a) be
advised by the Initial Adviser or an entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with the Initial Adviser (each, an
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
Continued
05FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5148-5151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02168]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 4850; File No. 803-00243]
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; Notice of Application
January 30, 2018.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an exemptive order under section
206A of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act'')
providing an exemption from the written disclosure and consent
requirements of section 206(3).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant: Janney Montgomery Scott LLC (``Applicant'').
Relevant Advisers Act Sections: Exemption requested under section 206A
from the written disclosure and consent requirements of section 206(3).
Summary of Application: The Applicant requests that the Commission
issue an order under section 206A exempting it and Future Advisers (as
defined below) from the written disclosure and consent requirements of
section 206(3) with respect to principal transactions with
nondiscretionary advisory client accounts.
Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 22, 2017.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving the Applicant with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on February 26, 2018, and should be accompanied
by proof of service on the Applicant, in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the
Advisers Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicant, c/o Laura E. Flores
and Monica L. Parry, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 1111 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura L. Solomon, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6915, or Robert Shapiro, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website at https://www.sec.gov/rules/iareleases.shtml or by
calling (202) 551-8090.
The Applicant seeks relief from the written disclosure and consent
[[Page 5149]]
requirements of section 206(3) of the Advisers Act that would be
similar to relief provided by Advisers Act rule 206(3)-3T (the
``Rule''), which expired by its terms on December 31, 2016. The relief
sought by the Applicant, if granted, would be subject to conditions
similar to those under the Rule, as well as certain revised or
additional conditions.
Applicant's Representations
1. The Applicant is registered as an investment adviser with the
Commission and is a registered broker-dealer. The Applicant offers the
Partners Advisory Program (the ``Program''), a nondiscretionary
advisory program.
2. The Applicant established the Program in 1999. Prior to December
31, 2016, the Applicant relied on the Rule to engage in principal
transactions with its clients in the Program.
3. As of December 31, 2016, the Applicant had a total of 23,428
client accounts enrolled in the Program with aggregate assets of
$7,318,704,000. On the same date, 1,491 client accounts had consented
to principal transactions in their Program accounts in reliance on the
Rule. In 2016, 4,527 trades were effected in reliance on the Rule in
the Program. Approximately 90 percent of the trades done in reliance on
the Rule in this period were purchases by client accounts; the average
purchase was approximately $29,228. Approximately 10 percent of the
trades done in reliance on the Rule in this period were sales from
client accounts; the average sale was approximately $30,011.
4. The Applicant acknowledges that the Order, if granted, would not
be construed as relieving in any way the Applicant from acting in the
best interests of an advisory client, including fulfilling the duty to
seek the best execution for the particular transaction for the advisory
client; nor shall it relieve the Applicant from any obligation that may
be imposed by sections 206(1) or (2) of the Advisers Act or by other
applicable provisions of the federal securities laws or applicable
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') rules.
Applicant's Legal Analysis
1. Section 206(3) provides that it is unlawful for any investment
adviser, directly or indirectly, acting as principal for its own
account, knowingly to sell any security to or purchase any security
from a client, without disclosing to the client in writing before the
completion of the transaction the capacity in which the adviser is
acting and obtaining the client's consent to the transaction. The Rule
deemed an investment adviser to be in compliance with the provisions of
section 206(3) of the Advisers Act when the investment adviser, or a
person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
investment adviser, acting as principal for its own account, sold to or
purchased from an advisory client any security, provided that the
investment adviser complied with the conditions of the Rule.
2. The Rule required, among other things, that the investment
adviser obtain a client's written, revocable consent prospectively
authorizing the adviser, directly or indirectly, acting as principal
for its own account, to sell any security to or purchase any security
from the client. The consent was required to be obtained after the
adviser provided the client with written disclosure about: (i) The
circumstances under which the investment adviser may engage in
principal transactions with the client; (ii) the nature and
significance of the conflicts the investment adviser has with its
client's interests as a result of those transactions; and (iii) how the
investment adviser addresses those conflicts. The investment adviser
also was required to provide trade-by-trade disclosure to the client,
before the execution of each principal transaction, of the capacity in
which the adviser may act with respect to the transaction, and obtain
the client's consent (which may be written or oral) to the transaction.
The Rule was available only to an investment adviser that was also a
broker-dealer registered under section 15 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') and could only be relied upon with
respect to a nondiscretionary account that was a brokerage account
subject to the Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder, and the rules of
the self-regulatory organization(s) of which it is a member. The Rule
was not available for principal transactions if the investment adviser
or a person who controlled, was controlled by, or was under common
control with the adviser (``control person'') was the issuer or an
underwriter of the security (except that an investment adviser could
rely on the Rule for trades in which the investment adviser or a
control person was an underwriter of non-convertible investment-grade
debt securities).
3. The Rule also required the investment adviser to provide to the
client a trade confirmation that, in addition to the requirements of
rule 10b-10 under the Exchange Act, included a conspicuous, plain
English statement informing the client that the investment adviser
disclosed to the client before the execution of the transaction that
the investment adviser may act as principal in connection with the
transaction, that the client authorized the transaction, and that the
investment adviser sold the security to or bought the security from the
client for its own account. The investment adviser also was required to
deliver to the client, at least annually, a written statement listing
all transactions that were executed in the account in reliance on the
Rule, including the date and price of each transaction.
4. The Rule expired on December 31, 2016. Absent the requested
relief, the Applicant would be required to provide trade-by-trade
written disclosure to each nondiscretionary advisory client with whom
the Applicant sought to engage in a principal transaction in accordance
with section 206(3). The Applicant submits that its nondiscretionary
clients have had access to the Applicant's inventory through principal
transactions with the Applicant for a number of years, and expect to
continue to have such access in the future. The Applicant believes that
engaging in principal transactions with its clients provides certain
benefits to its clients, including access to securities of limited
availability, such as municipal bonds, and that the written disclosure
and client consent requirements of section 206(3) act as an operational
barrier to its ability to engage in principal trades with its clients,
especially when the transaction involves securities of limited
availability.
5. Unless the Applicant is provided an exemption from the written
disclosure and client consent requirements of section 206(3), the
Applicant believes that it will be unable to provide the same range of
services and access to the same types of securities to its
nondiscretionary advisory clients as it was able to provide to its
clients under the Rule.
6. The Applicant notes that, if the requested relief is granted, it
will remain subject to the fiduciary duties that are generally
enforceable under sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act,
which, in general terms, require the Applicant to: (i) Disclose
material facts about the advisory relationship to its clients; (ii)
treat each client fairly; and (iii) act only in the best interests of
its client, disclosing conflicts of interest when present and obtaining
client consent to arrangements that present such conflicts.
7. The Applicant further notes that, in its capacity as a broker-
dealer with respect to these accounts, it will remain subject to a
comprehensive set of Commission and FINRA regulations that apply to the
relationship between a broker-dealer and its customer in
[[Page 5150]]
addition to the fiduciary duties an adviser owes a client. These rules
require, among other things, that the Applicant deal fairly with its
customers, seek to obtain best execution of customer orders, and make
only suitable recommendations. These obligations are designed to
promote business conduct that protects customers from abusive practices
that may not necessarily be fraudulent, and to protect against unfair
prices and excessive commissions. Specifically, these provisions, among
other things, require that the prices charged by the Applicant be
reasonably related to the prevailing market, and limit the commissions
and mark-ups the Applicant can charge. Additionally, these obligations
require that the Applicant have a reasonable basis to believe that a
recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or
securities is suitable for the customer, based on information obtained
through reasonable diligence.
8. The Applicant requests that the Commission issue an Order
pursuant to section 206A exempting it from the written disclosure and
consent requirements of section 206(3) only with respect to client
accounts in the Program and any similar nondiscretionary program to be
created in the future. The Applicant also requests that the
Commission's Order apply to future investment advisers controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with the Applicant (``Future
Advisers''). Any Future Adviser relying on any Order granted pursuant
to the application will comply with the terms and conditions stated in
the application.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All entities that currently intend to rely on any order
granted pursuant to the application are named as Applicants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's Conditions
The Applicant agrees that any Order granting the requested relief
will be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Applicant will exercise no ``investment discretion'' (as
such term is defined in section 3(a)(35) of the Exchange Act), except
investment discretion granted by the advisory client on a temporary or
limited basis,\2\ with respect to the client's account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Discretion is considered to be temporary or limited for
purposes of this condition when the investment adviser is given
discretion: (i) As to the price at which or the time to execute an
order given by a client for the purchase or sale of a definite
amount or quantity of a specified security; (ii) on an isolated or
infrequent basis, to purchase or sell a security or type of security
when a client is unavailable for a limited period of time not to
exceed a few months; (iii) as to cash management, such as to
exchange a position in a money market fund for another money market
fund or cash equivalent; (iv) to purchase or sell securities to
satisfy margin requirements; (v) to sell specific bonds and purchase
similar bonds in order to permit a client to take a tax loss on the
original position; (vi) to purchase a bond with a specified credit
rating and maturity; and (vii) to purchase or sell a security or
type of security limited by specific parameters established by the
client. See, e.g., Temporary Rule Regarding Principal Trades with
Certain Advisory Clients, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 2653
(Sept. 24, 2007) at n. 31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The Applicant will not trade in reliance on this Order any
security for which the Applicant or any person controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with the Applicant is the issuer, or, at
the time of the sale, an underwriter (as defined in section 202(a)(20)
of the Advisers Act).
3. The Applicant will not directly or indirectly require the client
to consent to principal trading as a condition to opening or
maintaining an account with the Applicant.
4. The advisory client has executed a written revocable consent
prospectively authorizing the Applicant directly or indirectly to act
as principal for its own account in selling any security to or
purchasing any security from the advisory client. The advisory client's
written consent must be obtained through a signature or other positive
manifestation of consent that is separate from or in addition to the
signature indicating the client's consent to the advisory agreement.
The separate or additional signature line or alternative means of
expressing consent must be preceded immediately by prominent, plain
English disclosure containing either: (a) An explanation of: (i) The
circumstances under which the Applicant directly or indirectly may
engage in principal transactions; (ii) the nature and significance of
conflicts with its client's interests as a result of the transactions;
and (iii) how the Applicant addresses those conflicts; or (b) a
statement explaining that the client is consenting to principal
transactions, followed by a cross-reference to a specific document
provided to the client containing the disclosure in (a)(i)-(iii) above
and to the specific page or pages on which such disclosure is located;
provided, however, that if the Applicant requires time to modify its
electronic systems to provide the specific page cross-reference
required by clause (b), the Applicant may, while updating such
electronic systems, and for no more than 90 days from the date of the
Order, instead provide a cross-reference to a specific document
provided to the client containing the disclosure in (a)(i)-(iii) above
and to the specific section in such document in which such disclosure
is located.
Transition provision: To the extent that the Applicant obtained
fully informed written revocable consent from an advisory client for
purposes of rule 206(3)-3T(a)(3) prior to January 1, 2017, the
Applicant may rely on this Order with respect to such client without
obtaining additional prospective consent from such client.
5. The Applicant, prior to the execution of each transaction in
reliance on this Order, will: (a) Inform the advisory client, orally or
in writing, of the capacity in which it may act with respect to such
transaction; and (b) obtain consent from the advisory client, orally or
in writing, to act as principal for its own account with respect to
such transaction.
6. The Applicant will send a written confirmation at or before
completion of each such transaction that includes, in addition to the
information required by rule 10b-10 under the Exchange Act, a
conspicuous, plain English statement informing the advisory client that
the Applicant: (a) Disclosed to the client prior to the execution of
the transaction that the Applicant may be acting in a principal
capacity in connection with the transaction and the client authorized
the transaction; and (b) sold the security to, or bought the security
from, the client for its own account.
7. The Applicant will send to the client, no less frequently than
annually, written disclosure containing a list of all transactions that
were executed in the client's account in reliance upon this Order, and
the date and price of each such transaction.
8. The Applicant is a broker-dealer registered under section 15 of
the Exchange Act and each account for which the Applicant relies on
this Order is a brokerage account subject to the Exchange Act, and the
rules thereunder, and the rules of the self-regulatory organization(s)
of which it is a member.
9. Each written disclosure required as a condition to this Order
will include a conspicuous, plain English statement that the client may
revoke the written consent referred to in Condition 4 above without
penalty at any time by written notice to the Applicant in accordance
with reasonable procedures established by the Applicant, but in all
cases such revocation must be given effect within 5 business days of
the Applicant's receipt thereof.
10. The Applicant will maintain records sufficient to enable
verification of compliance with the conditions of this Order. Such
records will include, without limitation: (a) Documentation sufficient
to demonstrate compliance with each disclosure and consent requirement
under this Order; (b) in particular, documentation sufficient to
demonstrate that, prior to the execution
[[Page 5151]]
of each transaction in reliance on this Order, the Applicant informed
the relevant advisory client of the capacity in which the Applicant may
act with respect to the transaction and that it received the advisory
client's consent (if the Applicant informs the client orally of the
capacity in which it may act with respect to such transaction or
obtains oral consent, such records may, for example, include recordings
of telephone conversations or contemporaneous written notations); and
(c) documentation sufficient to enable assessment of compliance by the
Applicant with sections 206(1) and (2) of the Advisers Act in
connection with its reliance on this Order.\3\ In each case, such
records will be maintained and preserved in an easily accessible place
for a period of not less than five years, the first two years in an
appropriate office of the Applicant, and be available for inspection by
the staff of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For example, under sections 206(1) and (2), an investment
adviser may not engage in any transaction on a principal basis with
a client that is not consistent with the best interests of the
client or that subrogates the client's interests to the interests of
the investment adviser. Cf. Investment Advisers Act Release No. 2106
(Jan. 31, 2003) (adopting Rule 206(4)-6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. The Applicant will adopt written compliance policies and
procedures reasonably designed to ensure, and the Applicant's chief
compliance officer will monitor, the Applicant's compliance with the
conditions of this Order. The Applicant's chief compliance officer
will, on at least a quarterly basis, conduct testing reasonably
sufficient to verify such compliance. Such written policies and
procedures, monitoring and testing will address, without limitation:
(a) Compliance by the Applicant with its disclosure and consent
requirements under this Order; (b) the integrity and operation of
electronic systems employed by the Applicant in connection with its
reliance on this Order; (c) compliance by the Applicant with its
recordkeeping obligations under this Order; and (d) whether there is
any evidence of the Applicant engaging in ``dumping'' in connection
with its reliance on this Order.\4\ The Applicant's chief compliance
officer will document the frequency and results of such monitoring and
testing, and the Applicant will maintain and preserve such
documentation in an easily accessible place for a period of not less
than five years, the first two years in an appropriate office of the
Applicant, and be available for inspection by the staff of the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Investment Trusts and Investment Companies, H.R. Doc. No. 279, 76th
Cong., 2d Sess., pt. 3, at 2581, 2589 (1939); Hearings on S. 3580
Before a Subcommittee of the Commission on Banking and Currency,
76th Cong., 3d Sess. 209, 212-23 (1940); Hearings on S. 3580 Before
the Subcomm. of the Comm. on Banking and Currency, 76th Cong., 3d
Sess. 322 (1940).
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02168 Filed 2-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P