Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 2770-2771 [2018-00925]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2770
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2018 / Notices
rescinding this review of the
antidumping duty order on certain pasta
from Italy, in part, with respect to
Andalini, DeLuca, GR.A.M.M., La
Molisana, Tamma, and Zaffiri.
Partial Rescission of the 2016–2017
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the parties
that requested a review withdraw the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. All of the
aforementioned withdrawal requests
were timely submitted and no other
interested party requested an
administrative review of these particular
companies. Therefore, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), and
consistent with our practice,8 we are
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Panarese Soceieta Agricola (Alessio),
Antico Pastificio Morelli 1860 S.r.l.
(Antico), Colussi SpA (Colussi),
Francesco Tamma S.p.A. (Tamma),
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. (Ghigi), Ghigi
Industria Agroalimentare in San
Clemente S.r.l.,3 G.R.A.M.M. S.r.l.
(GR.A.M.M.), Industria Alimentare
Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco), La Molisana
S.p.A. (La Molisana), Liguori Pastificio
dal 1820 S.p.A. (Liguori), Pasta Zara
S.p.A. (Zara), Pastificio Andalini S.p.A.
(Andalini), Pastificio Fratelli DeLuca
S.r.l. (DeLuca), Pastificio Menucci SpA
(Menucci), Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l.
(Zaffiri), and Tesa SrL (Tesa).4
On September 18, 2017, La Molisana
timely withdrew its request for a
review.5 On November 13, 2017, Tamma
timely withdrew its request for a
review.6 On December 12, 2017,
Andalini, DeLuca, GR.A.M.M., and
Zaffiri timely withdrew their respective
requests for an administrative review.7
No other party requested an
administrative review of these particular
companies.
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
3 In the 2015–16 antidumping duty review of
Certain Pasta from Italy, Commerce determined that
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. was formerly known as Ghigi
Industria Agroalimentare in San Clemente S.r.l. See
Memorandum titled ‘‘2015–2016 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from
Italy: Ghigi and Zara Collapsing Memorandum,’’
dated July 31, 2017.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
42974 (September 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
5 See Letter from Tamma to Commerce, ‘‘Certain
Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review Request,’’ dated November
13, 2017.
6 See Letter from La Molisana to Commerce,
‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy, A–475–818;
Withdraw Request for Review,’’ dated September
18, 2017.
7 See Letter from DeLuca, GR.A.M.M., Andalini,
and Zaffiri to Commerce, ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from
Italy, A–475–818; Withdraw Request for Review,’’
dated December 12, 2017.
8 See, e.g., Certain Lined Paper Products from
India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Extension of Time
Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11,
2009); see also Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under an APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Jan 18, 2018
Jkt 244001
[FR Doc. 2018–00923 Filed 1–18–18; 8:45 am]
Assessment
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Commerce will instruct Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. For the companies for which
this review is rescinded, Andalini,
DeLuca, GR.A.M.M., La Molisana,
Tamma, and Zaffiri, antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, during the period July 1,
2016, through June 30, 2017, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
from Thailand: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 74 FR 7218 (February 13,
2009).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Dated: January 12, 2018.
James Maeder,
Senior Director performing the duties of
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–008]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan:
Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
circular welded carbon steel pipes and
tubes from Taiwan. The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through
April 30, 2016. The amended final
weighted-average dumping margin is
listed below in the section entitled
‘‘Amended Final Results.’’
DATES: Applicable January 19, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Hoefke, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4947.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 20, 2017, Commerce
published the Final Results of this
review in the Federal Register.1 On
December 1, 2017, Shin Yang Steel Co.,
Ltd. (Shin Yang) timely filed a
ministerial error allegation concerning
the Final Results and requested,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224, that
Commerce correct the alleged
ministerial error.2
1 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016,
82 FR 55093 (November 20, 2017) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Taiwan; 2015–2016,’’ dated November 13, 2017
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
2 See Shin Yang’s December 1, 2017 Ministerial
Error Allegation.
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 13 / Friday, January 19, 2018 / Notices
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain circular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The
product is currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) item numbers
7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032,
7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description remains dispositive.3
Ministerial Error
Section 351.224(e) of Commerce’s
regulations provides that Commerce
will analyze any comments received
and, if appropriate, correct any
ministerial error by amending the final
determination or the final results of the
review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial
error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition,
subtraction, or other arithmetic
function, clerical error resulting from
inaccurate copying, duplication, or the
like, and any other similar type of
unintentional error which the Secretary
considers ministerial.’’
We analyzed Shin Yang’s ministerial
error allegation and determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), that
we made a ministerial error in our
calculation of Shin Yang’s dumping
margin. Specifically, we used an
incorrect window period to identify
home market sales available for
matching to U.S. sales (i.e., the
ENDDAY variable in Commerce’s
calculations program). We have now
corrected the error.4
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of correcting the
ministerial error for this review, we
determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists:
Producer/Exporter
Dumping
margin
(percent)
Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd ......
1.71
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these amended final
results of review within five days of the
3 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see Final Results and accompanying (Issues
and Decision Memorandum). The Department is not
making any changes to the scope of the order for
these amended final results.
4 See memorandum, ‘‘Amended Final Results
Analysis Memorandum for Shin Yang Steel Co.,
Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Jan 18, 2018
Jkt 244001
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment
Commerce shall determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For
Shin Yang, because its weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment
rates. We calculated customer-specific
weighted-average dumping margins by
dividing the total amount of dumping
for reviewed sales to the customer by
the total sales quantity associated with
those transactions, Commerce will
direct CBP to assess customer-specific
assessment rates based on the resulting
per-unit rates.5 We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review where a customer-specific
assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping
duties any entries for which the
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rates will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not
participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a previous
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 9.70
percent, the all-others rate established
5 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2771
in the LTFV investigation.6 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 11, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–00925 Filed 1–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Addition
and Deletions
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Proposed addition to and
deletions from the Procurement List.
AGENCY:
The Committee is proposing
to add a product to the Procurement List
that will be furnished by a nonprofit
agency employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities,
SUMMARY:
6 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order,
49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984).
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2770-2771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00925]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-008]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan:
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-
2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The
period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. The
amended final weighted-average dumping margin is listed below in the
section entitled ``Amended Final Results.''
DATES: Applicable January 19, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4947.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 20, 2017, Commerce published the Final Results of this
review in the Federal Register.\1\ On December 1, 2017, Shin Yang Steel
Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang) timely filed a ministerial error allegation
concerning the Final Results and requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224,
that Commerce correct the alleged ministerial error.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes
from Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 55093
(November 20, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2015-2016,'' dated
November 13, 2017 (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
\2\ See Shin Yang's December 1, 2017 Ministerial Error
Allegation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2771]]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and
7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description remains
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
Final Results and accompanying (Issues and Decision Memorandum). The
Department is not making any changes to the scope of the order for
these amended final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ministerial Error
Section 351.224(e) of Commerce's regulations provides that Commerce
will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any
ministerial error by amending the final determination or the final
results of the review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error''
as an error ``in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function,
clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the
like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the
Secretary considers ministerial.''
We analyzed Shin Yang's ministerial error allegation and
determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e) and (f), that we made a ministerial error in our calculation
of Shin Yang's dumping margin. Specifically, we used an incorrect
window period to identify home market sales available for matching to
U.S. sales (i.e., the ENDDAY variable in Commerce's calculations
program). We have now corrected the error.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See memorandum, ``Amended Final Results Analysis Memorandum
for Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd.'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of correcting the ministerial error for this review, we
determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping margin
Producer/Exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd............................... 1.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these amended
final results of review within five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For Shin Yang, because
its weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has calculated importer-specific
antidumping duty assessment rates. We calculated customer-specific
weighted-average dumping margins by dividing the total amount of
dumping for reviewed sales to the customer by the total sales quantity
associated with those transactions, Commerce will direct CBP to assess
customer-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit
rates.\5\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review where a customer-specific
assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the
Act: (1) The cash deposit rates will be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margins established in the final results of this review; (2)
for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in
this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation.\6\ These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes
from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 11, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-00925 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
