Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, Entitled “Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed”, 2252-2254 [2018-00522]

Download as PDF 2252 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Notices Management and Budget for extension and approval. Form 15 (17 CFR 249.323) is a certification of termination of a class of security under Section 12(g) or notice of suspension of duty to file reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). We estimate that approximately 1,302 issuers file Form 15 annually and it takes approximately 1.5 hours per response to prepare for a total of 1,953 annual burden hours (1.5 hours per response × 1,302 responses). Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Please direct your written comment to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: January 9, 2018. Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES [Release No. 34–82465; File No. SR–ISE– 2017–113] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange’s Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, Entitled ‘‘Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:48 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange’s Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, entitled ‘‘Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed,’’ to introduce a monthly fee of $1,000 for unlimited internal and/ or external distribution of the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed,3 as described further below. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 1. Purpose SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change [FR Doc. 2018–00498 Filed 1–12–18; 8:45 am] January 9, 2018. (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 26, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange’s Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, entitled ‘‘Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed,’’ to introduce a monthly fee of $1,000 for unlimited internal and/or external distribution of the ISE Trade Feed. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 As part of this proposal, the Exchange proposes to correct a typographical error by renaming the Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed the ‘‘Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed.’’ The Exchange hereinafter refers to the product by its corrected name. 2 17 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is a direct data feed product that displays last sale information about trades that occur in the Exchange’s execution system, along with opening price, cumulative volume, and high and low prices for the day. The data provided for each instrument includes the symbols (series and underlying security), put or call indicator, expiration date, the strike price of the series, and trading status. Access to real-time last sale options data from the Exchange increases transparency and enables firms to provide dynamically updated tickers, portfolio trackers and price/time charts. The Exchange presently offers subscriptions to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed for free. The Exchange proposes to amend Section J to charge a fee of $1,000 per month (for unlimited internal and external distribution) for a subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed. Upon effectiveness of the proposal, this monthly fee will apply to all firms that choose to subscribe to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed, including firms that currently receive it for free. Although the Exchange proposes to offer the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed for a fee on a standalone basis, it notes that the Trade Feed is a purely optional product and a subscription to it is not required to receive the data that it provides. The same ISE trade information that is available on the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is also broadcast on two other Nasdaq ISE data feeds: the ISE Top Quote Feed and the ISE Depth of Market Feed. The Exchange’s proposal to charge a fee for the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed reflects the value of the investments that the Exchange has made in developing, maintaining, and upgrading the ISE Trade Feed product and the Exchange trading facility that supports it, which include the following: • Exchange Re-Platform and Harmonization of Specifications. In connection with its recent acquisition by Nasdaq, Inc. and the associated efforts to re-platform and integrate the Exchange into the Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, the Exchange upgraded the ISE Trade Feed so that it is consistent with the specifications and formats of the other Nasdaq, Inc. data feeds. The re-platforming and associated upgrades will render connection to and consumption of the ISE Trade Feeds and other data products easier for customers to manage. Having one harmonized specification document format that is standardized across six exchanges makes initial onboarding and implementation of the data feeds into customers’ systems more efficient than having multiple documents in disparate E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1 daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Notices formats across different platforms. Furthermore, any updates or enhancements that are introduced across any of the six exchanges will now be more cost effective for customers to implement because of the standardized message format. In addition, the migration to the Nasdaq Inet technology allows customers to seamlessly conduct business across multiple exchanges by leveraging Nasdaq’s standard messaging protocols to interact with ISE data feeds as well as all Nasdaq options data feeds. Moreover, the hardware efficiencies provide a highly-distributed and efficient system for the Exchange to operate from. • Geographic Diversity. In connection with the Exchange’s integration into the Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, the Exchange moved its disaster recovery system to the site utilized by the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges in Chicago, Illinois. Customers can both receive market data and send orders through the Chicago facility, potentially reducing overall networking costs. Additionally, this new disaster recovery location enables firms to easily connect to a multitude of multi-asset class engines currently housed in or near this Chicago facility, which also may reduce networking costs. Adding such geographic diversity helps protect the market in the event of a catastrophic event impacting the entire East Coast. Lastly, the new facility has new equipment that will offer improved performance and resiliency. The Exchange notes while it and its sister exchange, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, are unique among their competitors in offering a standalone Trade Feed, the Exchange proposes to price the product at or below the prices that competing exchanges charge for their data feeds. The Exchange notes that although fees for external distribution of data feeds are typically higher than internal distribution fees, the Exchange proposes to charge the same price for both internal and external distribution of the Trade Feed as a means of incentivizing external distribution. The Exchange also notes that it proposes to price its Trade Feed higher than that of the Nasdaq GEMX product. The Exchange believes that this price differential is reasonable given the fact that the Exchange has more listings, strike volume, and market makers than does Nasdaq GEMX, such that the Exchange’s Trade Feed product has greater potential value to customers than does the Nasdaq GEMX product. Specifically, the ISE market has 3,788 listed options on its platform, totaling 732,000 strikes. Comparatively, GEMX has 2,642 listed options and 619.000 VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:48 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 [sic] strikes. ISE also has 33% more market makers providing liquidity than does GEMX. Finally, offering valuable trade data as a standalone feed allows for a much lower bandwidth option that customers can utilize instead of having to subscribe to other ISE feeds that may include quotes and orders and require much more system effort to consume and utilize due to the larger number of messages required for processing. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,5 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and selfregulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’) revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 6 Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission 7 (‘‘NetCoalition’’) the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission’s use of a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a costbased approach.8 As the court emphasized, the Commission ‘‘intended in Regulation NMS that ‘market forces, rather than regulatory requirements’ play a role in determining the market data . . . to be made available to investors and at what cost.’’ 9 Further, ‘‘[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. 4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). 6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’). 7 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010). 8 See NetCoalition, at 534–535. 9 Id. at 537. 5 15 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2253 national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for execution’; [and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted’ because ‘no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker dealers’. . . .’’ 10 Although the court and the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange believes that these views apply with equal force to the options markets. The Exchange believes that its proposal is reasonable to charge a monthly fee for all subscriptions to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed because this product provides valuable data to firms. As noted above, access to real-time last sale options data from the Exchange increases transparency and enables firms to provide dynamically updated tickers, portfolio trackers and price/time charts. Moreover, the Exchange believes its proposal to charge a monthly fee of $1,000 for a subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is a reasonable reflection of the Exchange’s costs in producing, maintaining, and upgrading the product to provide value to subscribers. The Exchange notes, for example, that in connection with its recent acquisition by Nasdaq, Inc. and the associated efforts to re-platform and integrate the Exchange into the Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, the Exchange upgraded the Trade Feed so that it is consistent with the specifications and formats of the other Nasdaq, Inc. data feeds. The replatforming and associated upgrades will render connection to and consumption of the Trade Feeds and other data products easier for customers to manage. Moreover, the Exchange’s integration into Nasdaq, Inc. has also resulted in its migration to a more robust and geographically diverse disaster recovery facility, located in Chicago, IL. Customers can both receive market data and send orders through the Chicago facility, potentially reducing overall networking costs. Adding such geographic diversity helps protect the market in the event of a catastrophic event impacting the entire East Coast. The Exchange notes that while it and its sister exchange, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, are unique among its competitors in offering a standalone Trade Feed, the Exchange proposes to price the product 10 Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–83 (December 9, 2008) (SR– NYSEArca–2006–21)). E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1 2254 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Notices at or below the prices that competing exchanges charge for their data feeds. The Exchange notes that although fees for external distribution of data feeds are typically higher than internal distribution fees, the Exchange proposes to charge the same price for both internal and external distribution of the ISE Trade Feed as a means of incentivizing external distribution. The Exchange also notes that it proposes to price its Trade Feed higher than that of the Nasdaq GEMX product. The Exchange believes that this price differential is reasonable given the fact that the Exchange has more listings, strike volume, and market makers than does Nasdaq GEMX, such that the Exchange’s Trade Feed product has greater potential value to customers than does the Nasdaq GEMX product. The Exchange believes that the proposal is an equitable allocation and is not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the same fee to all, regardless of membership. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. In this instance, the proposed establishment of the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed fee does not impose an undue burden on competition because a subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is completely voluntary and subject to extensive competition from other exchanges. In sum, if the change proposed herein is unattractive to market participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impair the ability of members or competing order execution venues to VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:48 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.11 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– ISE–2017–113 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE–2017–113. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written 11 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE–2017–113 and should be submitted on or before February 6, 2018. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.12 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–00522 Filed 1–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [SEC File No. 270–614, OMB Control No. 3235–0682] Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736 Extension: Rule 13h–1 and Form 13H Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the existing collection of information provided for Rule 13h–1 (17 CFR 240.13h–1) and Form 13H—registration of large traders 1 submitted pursuant to 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 13h–1(a)(1) defines ‘‘large trader’’ as any person that directly or indirectly, including through other persons controlled by such person, exercises investment discretion over one or more accounts and effects transactions for the purchase or sale of any NMS security for or on behalf of such accounts, by or through one or more registered broker-dealers, in an aggregate amount equal to or greater than the 1 Rule E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM 16JAN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2252-2254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82465; File No. SR-ISE-2017-113]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, Entitled 
``Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed''

January 9, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on December 26, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, 
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees at 
Chapter VIII, Section J, entitled ``Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed,'' to 
introduce a monthly fee of $1,000 for unlimited internal and/or 
external distribution of the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed,\3\ as described 
further below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As part of this proposal, the Exchange proposes to correct a 
typographical error by renaming the Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed the 
``Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed.'' The Exchange hereinafter refers to the 
product by its corrected name.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's 
Schedule of Fees at Chapter VIII, Section J, entitled ``Nasdaq ISE 
Trades Feed,'' to introduce a monthly fee of $1,000 for unlimited 
internal and/or external distribution of the ISE Trade Feed.
    The Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is a direct data feed product that 
displays last sale information about trades that occur in the 
Exchange's execution system, along with opening price, cumulative 
volume, and high and low prices for the day. The data provided for each 
instrument includes the symbols (series and underlying security), put 
or call indicator, expiration date, the strike price of the series, and 
trading status. Access to real-time last sale options data from the 
Exchange increases transparency and enables firms to provide 
dynamically updated tickers, portfolio trackers and price/time charts.
    The Exchange presently offers subscriptions to the Nasdaq ISE Trade 
Feed for free. The Exchange proposes to amend Section J to charge a fee 
of $1,000 per month (for unlimited internal and external distribution) 
for a subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed. Upon effectiveness of 
the proposal, this monthly fee will apply to all firms that choose to 
subscribe to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed, including firms that currently 
receive it for free.
    Although the Exchange proposes to offer the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed 
for a fee on a standalone basis, it notes that the Trade Feed is a 
purely optional product and a subscription to it is not required to 
receive the data that it provides. The same ISE trade information that 
is available on the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is also broadcast on two 
other Nasdaq ISE data feeds: the ISE Top Quote Feed and the ISE Depth 
of Market Feed.
    The Exchange's proposal to charge a fee for the Nasdaq ISE Trade 
Feed reflects the value of the investments that the Exchange has made 
in developing, maintaining, and upgrading the ISE Trade Feed product 
and the Exchange trading facility that supports it, which include the 
following:
     Exchange Re-Platform and Harmonization of Specifications. 
In connection with its recent acquisition by Nasdaq, Inc. and the 
associated efforts to re-platform and integrate the Exchange into the 
Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, the Exchange upgraded the ISE Trade 
Feed so that it is consistent with the specifications and formats of 
the other Nasdaq, Inc. data feeds. The re-platforming and associated 
upgrades will render connection to and consumption of the ISE Trade 
Feeds and other data products easier for customers to manage. Having 
one harmonized specification document format that is standardized 
across six exchanges makes initial onboarding and implementation of the 
data feeds into customers' systems more efficient than having multiple 
documents in disparate

[[Page 2253]]

formats across different platforms. Furthermore, any updates or 
enhancements that are introduced across any of the six exchanges will 
now be more cost effective for customers to implement because of the 
standardized message format. In addition, the migration to the Nasdaq 
Inet technology allows customers to seamlessly conduct business across 
multiple exchanges by leveraging Nasdaq's standard messaging protocols 
to interact with ISE data feeds as well as all Nasdaq options data 
feeds. Moreover, the hardware efficiencies provide a highly-distributed 
and efficient system for the Exchange to operate from.
     Geographic Diversity. In connection with the Exchange's 
integration into the Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, the Exchange 
moved its disaster recovery system to the site utilized by the other 
Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges in Chicago, Illinois. Customers can both receive 
market data and send orders through the Chicago facility, potentially 
reducing overall networking costs. Additionally, this new disaster 
recovery location enables firms to easily connect to a multitude of 
multi-asset class engines currently housed in or near this Chicago 
facility, which also may reduce networking costs. Adding such 
geographic diversity helps protect the market in the event of a 
catastrophic event impacting the entire East Coast. Lastly, the new 
facility has new equipment that will offer improved performance and 
resiliency.
    The Exchange notes while it and its sister exchange, Nasdaq GEMX, 
LLC, are unique among their competitors in offering a standalone Trade 
Feed, the Exchange proposes to price the product at or below the prices 
that competing exchanges charge for their data feeds. The Exchange 
notes that although fees for external distribution of data feeds are 
typically higher than internal distribution fees, the Exchange proposes 
to charge the same price for both internal and external distribution of 
the Trade Feed as a means of incentivizing external distribution.
    The Exchange also notes that it proposes to price its Trade Feed 
higher than that of the Nasdaq GEMX product. The Exchange believes that 
this price differential is reasonable given the fact that the Exchange 
has more listings, strike volume, and market makers than does Nasdaq 
GEMX, such that the Exchange's Trade Feed product has greater potential 
value to customers than does the Nasdaq GEMX product. Specifically, the 
ISE market has 3,788 listed options on its platform, totaling 732,000 
strikes. Comparatively, GEMX has 2,642 listed options and 619.000 [sic] 
strikes. ISE also has 33% more market makers providing liquidity than 
does GEMX.
    Finally, offering valuable trade data as a standalone feed allows 
for a much lower bandwidth option that customers can utilize instead of 
having to subscribe to other ISE feeds that may include quotes and 
orders and require much more system effort to consume and utilize due 
to the larger number of messages required for processing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, 
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation 
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market 
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') revenues 
and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system 
``has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its 
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed 
companies.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting 
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission \7\ 
(``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of a 
market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees 
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based 
approach.\8\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in 
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory 
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be 
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \8\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
    \9\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is 
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market 
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that 
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of 
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to 
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange 
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of 
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \10\ Although the court and 
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange 
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options 
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) 
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal is reasonable to charge a 
monthly fee for all subscriptions to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed because 
this product provides valuable data to firms. As noted above, access to 
real-time last sale options data from the Exchange increases 
transparency and enables firms to provide dynamically updated tickers, 
portfolio trackers and price/time charts.
    Moreover, the Exchange believes its proposal to charge a monthly 
fee of $1,000 for a subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is a 
reasonable reflection of the Exchange's costs in producing, 
maintaining, and upgrading the product to provide value to subscribers. 
The Exchange notes, for example, that in connection with its recent 
acquisition by Nasdaq, Inc. and the associated efforts to re-platform 
and integrate the Exchange into the Nasdaq, Inc. family of exchanges, 
the Exchange upgraded the Trade Feed so that it is consistent with the 
specifications and formats of the other Nasdaq, Inc. data feeds. The 
re-platforming and associated upgrades will render connection to and 
consumption of the Trade Feeds and other data products easier for 
customers to manage.
    Moreover, the Exchange's integration into Nasdaq, Inc. has also 
resulted in its migration to a more robust and geographically diverse 
disaster recovery facility, located in Chicago, IL. Customers can both 
receive market data and send orders through the Chicago facility, 
potentially reducing overall networking costs. Adding such geographic 
diversity helps protect the market in the event of a catastrophic event 
impacting the entire East Coast.
    The Exchange notes that while it and its sister exchange, Nasdaq 
GEMX, LLC, are unique among its competitors in offering a standalone 
Trade Feed, the Exchange proposes to price the product

[[Page 2254]]

at or below the prices that competing exchanges charge for their data 
feeds. The Exchange notes that although fees for external distribution 
of data feeds are typically higher than internal distribution fees, the 
Exchange proposes to charge the same price for both internal and 
external distribution of the ISE Trade Feed as a means of incentivizing 
external distribution.
    The Exchange also notes that it proposes to price its Trade Feed 
higher than that of the Nasdaq GEMX product. The Exchange believes that 
this price differential is reasonable given the fact that the Exchange 
has more listings, strike volume, and market makers than does Nasdaq 
GEMX, such that the Exchange's Trade Feed product has greater potential 
value to customers than does the Nasdaq GEMX product.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is an equitable allocation 
and is not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the 
same fee to all, regardless of membership.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market 
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more 
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust 
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges. Because 
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because 
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, 
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this 
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed establishment of the Nasdaq ISE 
Trade Feed fee does not impose an undue burden on competition because a 
subscription to the Nasdaq ISE Trade Feed is completely voluntary and 
subject to extensive competition from other exchanges. In sum, if the 
change proposed herein is unattractive to market participants, it is 
likely that the Exchange will lose market share as a result. 
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change 
will impair the ability of members or competing order execution venues 
to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public 
interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such 
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether 
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2017-113 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-113. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-113 and should be submitted on 
or before February 6, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00522 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.