Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Fees for Certain Market Data Products on the Exchange's Equity Options Platform, 1647-1651 [2018-00413]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Notices
intended to make the Schedule of Fees
more transparent to members and
investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. As discussed
above, the proposed changes are
intended to more accurately reflect the
regulatory and administrative costs
associated with a member’s use of the
Exchange, or are clean-ups to make the
Schedule of Fees more transparent to
members and investors. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.8 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
GEMX–2017–62 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–GEMX–2017–62. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–GEMX–2017–62 and
should be submitted on or before
February 2, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–00411 Filed 1–11–18; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82462; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2017–010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Fees
for Certain Market Data Products on
the Exchange’s Equity Options
Platform
January 8, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
27, 2017, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the Market Data section of its fee
schedule applicable to its equity options
platform (‘‘EDGX Options’’) to adopt
fees for certain of its market data
products, which are currently offered
free of charge. The Exchange also
proposes to amend the names of these
market data products in Exchange Rule
21.15(b).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s website at
www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jan 11, 2018
9 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
2 17
Sfmt 4703
1647
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
12JAN1
1648
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Market Data section of its fee schedule
applicable to EDGX Options to adopt
fees for certain of its market data
products, which are currently offered
free of charge. The Exchange also
proposes to amend the names of these
market data products in Exchange Rule
21.15(b).
The Exchange proposes to adopt fees
for the following market data products:
EDGX Options Depth (currently referred
to as Multicast PITCH), EDGX Options
Top (currently referred to Multicast
Top), and EDGX Options Auction Feed.
Each of these market data products are
currently offered free of charge. The
Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
21.15(b) to revise the names of each of
these market data products.
Multicast Pitch, to be renamed as
EDGX Options Depth, is a data feed that
offers depth of book quotations and
execution information based on options
orders entered into the System.3 The
Exchange offers separate EDGX Options
Depth data feeds for the Exchange’s
Simple Book and the Exchange’s
Complex Order Book. The Exchange
introduced Complex Order Book
functionality on October 23, 2017.4 The
Exchange’s Complex Book is the EDGX
Options electronic book of Complex
Orders.5 The Exchange’s Simple Book is
its regular electronic book of orders.6
Multicast TOP, to be renamed as
EDGX Options Top, is a data feed that
offers top of book quotations and
execution information based on options
orders entered into the System.7 Like
the EDGX Options Depth feed, the
Exchange offers separate EDGX Options
Top data feeds for the Exchange’s
Simple Book and the Exchange’s
Complex Order Book.
Finally, the Auction Feed, to be
renamed the EDGX Options Auctions
3 Exchange
Rule 21.15(b)(1).
Rule 21.20. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 81891 (October 17, 2017),
82 FR 49058 (October 23, 2017) (order approving
the Exchange’s proposal to adopt a complex order
book) (SR–BatsEDGX–2017–29).
5 Exchange Rule 21.20.(a)(6). A ‘‘Complex Order’’
is any order involving the concurrent purchase and/
or sale of two or more different options in the same
underlying security (the ‘‘legs’’ or ‘‘components’’ of
the complex order), for the same account, in a ratio
that is equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333)
and less than or equal to three-to-one (3.00) and for
the purposes of executing a particular investment
strategy. Exchange Rule 21.20(a)(5).
6 Exchange Rule 21.20(a)(10). See also Exchange
Rule 16.1(a)(9) (defining the EDGX Options Book).
7 Exchange Rule 21.15(b)(2).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
4 Exchange
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Feed, is a data feed that provides
information regarding the current status
of price and size information related to
auctions conducted by the Exchange.8
Like EDGX Options Depth and EDGX
Options Top, the Exchange offers
separate EDGX Options Auction data
feeds for the Exchange’s Simple Book
and the Exchange’s Complex Order
Book.
The Exchange now proposes to amend
its fee schedule to incorporate fees for
distribution of each of the above market
data products to subscribers. The
proposed fees include the following,
each of which are described in detail
below: (i) Distribution Fees for both
Internal and External Distributors; 9 and
(ii) Usage Fees for both Professional 10
and Non-Professional 11 Users. The
Exchange is proposing identical
Distribution and Users fees for each
market data product described above.
Also, Distributors and Users of any one
of the market data products subject to
this proposal may receive access to any
or all of the other market data products
at no additional charge.
Distribution Fees. As proposed, each
Internal Distributor and External
Distributor that receives either the
simple or complex versions of EDGX
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top,
and/or the EDGX Options Auction Feed
shall pay a fee of $500 per month.
User Fees. The Exchange proposes to
charge Internal Distributors and
8 Exchange
Rule 21.15(b)(5).
‘‘Distributor’’ is defined as ‘‘any entity that
receives the Exchange Market Data product directly
from the Exchange or indirectly through another
entity and then distributes it internally or externally
to a third party.’’ See the Exchange’s fee schedule
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/
membership/fee_schedule/edgx/. An ‘‘Internal
Distributor’’ is defined as ‘‘a Distributor that
receives the Exchange Market Data product and
then distributes that data to one or more Users
within the Distributor’s own entity.’’ Id. An
‘‘External Distributor’’ is defined as ‘‘a Distributor
that receives the Exchange Market Data product and
then distributes that data to a third party or one or
more Users outside the Distributor’s own entity.’’
Id.’’
10 A ‘‘Professional User’’ is defined as ‘‘any User
other than a Non-Professional User.’’ See the
Exchange’s fee schedule available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_
schedule/edgx/.
11 A ‘‘Non-Professional User’’ is defined as ‘‘a
natural person who is not: (i) Registered or qualified
in any capacity with the Commission, the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, any state
securities agency, any securities exchange or
association, or any commodities or futures contract
market or association; (ii) engaged as an
‘‘investment adviser’’ as that term is defined in
Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940 (whether or not registered or qualified
under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank or other
organization exempt from registration under federal
or state securities laws to perform functions that
would require registration or qualification if such
functions were performed for an organization not so
exempt.’’ Id.
9A
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
External Distributors that redistribute
either the simple or complex versions of
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options
Top, and/or the EDGX Options Auction
Feed different fees for their Professional
Users and Non-Professional Users. The
Exchange will assess a monthly fee for
Professional Users of $10.00 per User.
Non-Professional Users will be assessed
a monthly fee of $1.00 per User.
Distributors that receive either the
simple or complex versions of EDGX
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top,
and/or the EDGX Options Auction Feed
will be required to count every
Professional User and Non-Professional
User to which they provide the market
data product(s), the requirements for
which are identical to that currently in
place for other market data products
offered by the Exchange’s equity trading
platform.12 Thus, the Distributor’s count
will include every person and device
that accesses the data regardless of the
purpose for which the individual or
device uses the data. Distributors must
report all Professional and NonProfessional Users in accordance with
the following:
• In connection with a Distributor’s
distribution of the market data product,
the Distributor should count as one User
each unique User that the Distributor
has entitled to have access to the market
data product. However, where a device
is dedicated specifically to a single
individual, the Distributor should count
only the individual and need not count
the device.
• The Distributor should identify and
report each unique User. If a User uses
the same unique method to gain access
to the market data product, the
Distributor should count that as one
User. However, if a unique User uses
multiple methods to gain access to the
market data product (e.g., a single User
has multiple passwords and user
identifications), the Distributor should
report all of those methods as an
individual User.
• Distributors should report each
unique individual person who receives
access through multiple devices as one
User so long as each device is dedicated
specifically to that individual.
• If a Distributor entitles one or more
individuals to use the same device, the
Distributor should include only the
individuals, and not the device, in the
count.
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
74282 (February 18, 2015); 80 FR 9487 (February
23, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–09) (proposing fees for
the Bats One Feed); 75397 (July 8, 2015), 80 FR
41104 (July 14, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–28)
(proposing user fees for the EDGX Top and Last
Sale data feeds); and 75788 (August 28, 2015), 80
FR 53364 (September 3, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–38)
(proposing fees for EDGX Book Viewer).
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange intends to implement
the proposed changes to its fee schedule
on January 2, 2018.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,13
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),14 in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members and
other recipients of Exchange data. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rates are equitable and nondiscriminatory in that they apply
uniformly to all recipients of Exchange
data and that the proposed fees are
competitive with those charged by other
venues and, therefore, reasonable and
equitably allocated to recipients.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 11(A) of the Act 15 in that it
supports (i) fair competition among
brokers and dealers, among exchange
markets, and between exchange markets
and markets other than exchange
markets and (ii) the availability to
brokers, dealers, and investors of
information with respect to quotations
for and transactions in securities.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change
is consistent with Rule 603 of
Regulation NMS,16 which provides that
any national securities exchange that
distributes information with respect to
quotations for or transactions in an NMS
stock do so on terms that are not
unreasonably discriminatory. In
adopting Regulation NMS, the
Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations and broker-dealers
increased authority and flexibility to
offer new and unique market data to the
public. It was believed that this
authority would expand the amount of
data available to consumers, and also
spur innovation and competition for the
provision of market data.
In addition, the proposed fees would
not permit unfair discrimination
because all of the Exchange’s customers
and market data vendors will be subject
to the proposed fees on an equivalent
basis. EDGX Options Depth, EDGX
Options Top, and the EDGX Options
Auction Feed are distributed and
purchased on a voluntary basis, in that
neither the Exchange nor market data
distributors are required by any rule or
regulation to make this data available.
Accordingly, Distributors and Users can
13 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
15 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
16 17 CFR 242.603.
14 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
discontinue use at any time and for any
reason, including due to an assessment
of the reasonableness of fees charged.
Firms have a wide variety of alternative
market data products from which to
choose, such as similar proprietary data
products offered by other exchanges and
consolidated data. Moreover, the
Exchange is not required to make any
proprietary data products available or to
offer any specific pricing alternatives to
any customers.
In addition, the fees that are the
subject of this rule filing are constrained
by competition. As explained below in
the Exchange’s Statement on Burden on
Competition, the existence of
alternatives to EDGX Options Depth,
EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX
Options Auction Feed further ensures
that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are
unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect such
alternatives. That is, the Exchange
competes with other exchanges (and
their affiliates) that provide similar
market data products. If another
exchange (or its affiliate) were to charge
less to distribute its similar product
than the Exchange charges to distribute
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options
Top, and the EDGX Options Auction
Feed, prospective Users likely would
not subscribe to, or would cease
subscribing to, EDGX Options Depth,
EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX
Options Auction Feed.
The Exchange notes that the
Commission is not required to
undertake a cost-of-service or ratemaking approach. The Exchange
believes that, even if it were possible as
a matter of economic theory, cost-based
pricing for non-core market data would
be so complicated that it could not be
done practically.
Distribution Fee. The Exchange
believes that the proposed Distribution
Fees are also reasonable, equitably
allocated, and not unreasonably
discriminatory. The fees for Members
and non-Members are uniform except
with respect to reasonable distinctions
with respect to internal and external
distribution, the fee for both are equal
for each of the market data products
subject to this proposal. The Exchange
believes that the Distribution Fees for
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options
Top, and the EDGX Options Auction
Feed are reasonable and fair in light of
alternatives offered by other market
centers. For example, EDGX Options
Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the
EDGX Options Auction Feed provides
investors with alternative market data
and competes with similar market data
product currently offered by Nasdaq
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1649
PHLX LLC (‘‘PHLX’’). Specifically,
PHLX charges a fee of $5,000 per month
to External Distributors and $4,000 per
month to Internal Distributors for the
TOPO Plus Orders feed,17 which
included PHLX’s complex order book.
PHLX also charges Internal Distributors
$2,000 per month and External
Distributors $2,500 per month for the
Top of PHLX Options, which includes
PHLX top of book data.18 PHLX charges
Internal Distributors $4,000 per month
and External Distributors $4,500 per
month for the PHLX Depth Data, which
includes PHLX depth of book
quotations.19 Each of these fees charged
by PHLX are higher than that proposed
herein.
User Fees. The Exchange believes that
implementing the Professional and NonProfessional User fees for EDGX Options
Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the
EDGX Options Auction Feed are
equitable and reasonable because they
will result in greater availability to
Professional and Non-Professional
Users. Moreover, introducing a modest
Non-Professional User fee for EDGX
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and
the EDGX Options Auction Feed is
reasonable because it provides an
additional method for retail investors to
access EDGX Options Depth, EDGX
Options Top, and the EDGX Options
Auction Feed data by providing the
same data that is available to
Professional Users. The Exchange
believes that the proposed fees are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because they will be
charged uniformly to recipient firms
and Users. The fee structure of
differentiated Professional and NonProfessional fees is utilized by the
Exchange for the Cboe One Feed and
has long been used by other exchanges
for their proprietary data products, and
by the Nasdaq UTP and the CTA and CQ
Plans in order to reduce the price of
data to retail investors and make it more
broadly available.20 Offering EDGX
17 See a description of TOPO Plus Orders
available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Micro.aspx?id=topoplusorders. See also Section IV
of PHLX Rules outlining the fees for the TOPO Plus
Orders feed.
18 See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees
for the Top of PHLX Options feed.
19 See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees
for the PHLX Depth Data feed.
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
74285 (February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9828 (February
24, 2015) (SR–BATS–2015–11); 74283 (February 18,
2015), 80 FR 9809 (February 24, 2015) (SR–EDGA–
2015–09); 74282 (February 17, 2015), 80 FR 9487
(February 23, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–09); and
74284 (February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9792 (February
24, 2015) (SR–BYX–2015–09). See also, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 20002, File No.
S7–433 (July 22, 1983) (establishing
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
Continued
12JAN1
1650
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Notices
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and
the EDGX Options Auction Feed to NonProfessional Users with the same data
available to Professional Users results in
greater equity among data recipients.
The requirement that Distributors count
every Professional User and NonProfessional User to which they provide
the market data product(s) is also
equitable and reasonable because the
requirements are identical to that
currently in place for other market data
products offered by the Exchange’s
equity trading platform.21
In addition, the proposed fees are
reasonable when compared to similar
fees for comparable products offered by
PHLX. Specifically, PHLX charges a fee
of $40 per month to professional users
and $1.00 per month to nonprofessional users of TOPO Plus Orders
feed, Top of PHLX Options, and PHLX
Depth Data.22 Each of these fees charged
by PHLX are either equal to or higher
than that proposed herein.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
The Exchange’s ability to price EDGX
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and
the EDGX Options Auction Feed is
constrained by: (i) Competition among
exchanges, other trading platforms, and
Trade Reporting Facilities (‘‘TRF’’) that
compete with each other in a variety of
dimensions; (ii) the existence of
inexpensive real-time consolidated data
and market-specific data and free
delayed data; and (iii) the inherent
contestability of the market for
proprietary data.
The Exchange and its market data
products are subject to significant
competitive forces and the proposed
fees represent responses to that
competition. To start, the Exchange
competes intensely for order flow. It
competes with the other national
securities exchanges that currently trade
equities, with electronic communication
networks, with quotes posted in
FINRA’s Alternative Display Facility,
nonprofessional fees for CTA data); and Nasdaq
Rules 7023(b), 7047.
21 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
74282 (February 18, 2015); 80 FR 9487 (February
23, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–09) (proposing fees for
the Bats One Feed); 75397 (July 8, 2015), 80 FR
41104 (July 14, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–28)
(proposing user fees for the EDGX Top and Last
Sale data feeds); and 75788 (August 28, 2015), 80
FR 53364 (September 3, 2015) (SR–EDGX–2015–38)
(proposing fees for EDGX Book Viewer).
22 See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees
for each of these PHLX market data products.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
with alternative trading systems, and
with securities firms that primarily
trade as principal with their customer
order flow.
In addition, EDGX Options Depth,
EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX
Options Auction Feed compete with a
number of alternative products. For
instance, EDGX Options Depth, EDGX
Options Top, and the EDGX Options
Auction Feed do not provide a complete
picture of all trading activity in a
security. Rather, the other national
securities exchanges, the several TRFs
of FINRA, and Electronic
Communication Networks (‘‘ECN’’) that
produce proprietary data all produce
trades and trade reports. Each is
currently permitted to produce last sale
information products, and many
currently do, including Nasdaq and
NYSE. In addition, market participants
can gain access to EDGX Options last
sale and depth-of-book quotations,
though integrated with the prices of
other markets, on feeds made available
through the SIPs.
In sum, the availability of a variety of
alternative sources of information
imposes significant competitive
pressures on Exchange data products
and the Exchange’s compelling need to
attract order flow imposes significant
competitive pressure on the Exchange to
act equitably, fairly, and reasonably in
setting the proposed data product fees.
The proposed data product fees are, in
part, responses to that pressure. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees would reflect an equitable
allocation of its overall costs to users of
its facilities.
In addition, when establishing the
proposed fees, the Exchange considered
the competitiveness of the market for
proprietary data and all of the
implications of that competition. The
Exchange believes that it has considered
all relevant factors and has not
considered irrelevant factors in order to
establish fair, reasonable, and not
unreasonably discriminatory fees and an
equitable allocation of fees among all
Users. The existence of alternatives to
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options
Top, and the EDGX Options Auction
Feed, including existing similar feeds by
other exchanges, consolidated data, and
proprietary data from other sources,
ensures that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are
unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect these
alternatives or choose not to purchase a
specific proprietary data product if its
cost to purchase is not justified by the
returns any particular vendor or
subscriber would achieve through the
purchase.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 23 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.24 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2017–010 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number CboeEDGX–2017–010. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
23 15
24 17
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Notices
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number CboeEDGX–2017–010 and
should be submitted on or before
February 2, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–00413 Filed 1–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82456; File No. SR–BOX–
2017–33]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Minimum Order Size for the
Floor Broker Guarantee Provided in
BOX Rule 7600(f)
January 8, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On November 6, 2017, BOX Options
Exchange LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘BOX’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to amend the
minimum eligible order size from 500
contracts to 50 contracts to qualify for
the Floor Broker guarantee described in
BOX Rule 7600(f). The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on November 24,
2017.3 The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
25 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82112
(November 17, 2017), 82 FR 55895 (‘‘Notice’’).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
This order approves the proposed rule
change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change 4
Currently, BOX Rule 7600(f) provides
that a Floor Broker holding an order of
the eligible order size or greater is
entitled to cross, after all equal or better
priced Public Customer bids or offers on
the BOX Book and any non-Public
Customer bids or offers that are ranked
ahead of such Public Customer bids or
offers are filled, 40% of the remaining
contracts in the order with other orders
he is holding.5 Under the current rule,
the Exchange may determine, on an
option by option basis, the eligible order
size for an order that may be transacted
pursuant to BOX Rule 7600(f), but the
minimum eligible order size may not be
less than 500 contracts.6 Under the
proposed rule change, the Exchange
proposes to reduce the minimum
eligible order size from 500 contracts to
50 contracts.7
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.8 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,9 which requires,
among other things, that the Exchange’s
rules be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Commission notes that the
proposed rule change does not modify
the size of the Floor Broker guarantee,
but rather modifies the size of the order
necessary in order to receive the
guarantee. Orders submitted by Floor
Brokers for execution must execute at a
price equal to or better than the NBBO
and (1) may not trade through any equal
or better priced Public Customer bids or
4 For a more detailed description of the proposed
rule change, see Notice, supra note 3.
5 See BOX Rule 7600(f).
6 See BOX Rule 7600(f)(2). Pursuant to BOX Rule
7600(f)(2), the Exchange is required to communicate
any changes to the eligible order size to Participants
via circular.
7 See proposed BOX Rule 7600(f)(2).
8 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1651
offers on the BOX Book 10 or any nonPublic Customer bids or offers on the
BOX Book that are ranked ahead of such
equal or better priced Public Customer
bids or offers, and (2) may not trade
through any non-Public Customer bids
or offers on the BOX Book that are
priced better than the proposed
execution price.11 In addition, the
Commission notes that the proposed
change is similar to the rules of other
options exchanges 12 and therefore, the
Commission does not believe that the
reduction in the minimum order size
requirement raises any new regulatory
issues.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act 13 and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change (SR–BOX–2017–
33), be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–00407 Filed 1–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No: SSA–2017–0069]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Request and
Comment Request
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages requiring clearance
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, effective October
1, 1995. This notice includes revisions
of OMB-approved information
collections.
SSA is soliciting comments on the
accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate; the need for the information;
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
minimize burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
10 See
BOX Rule 100(a)(10) (defining BOX Book).
BOX Rule 7600(c).
12 See Cboe Options Rule 6.74(d) and NYSE Arca
Inc. Rule 6.47–O(b)(1).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
11 See
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1647-1651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82462; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2017-010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt Fees for Certain Market Data Products on the Exchange's Equity
Options Platform
January 8, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 27, 2017, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange''
or ``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the Market Data section of
its fee schedule applicable to its equity options platform (``EDGX
Options'') to adopt fees for certain of its market data products, which
are currently offered free of charge. The Exchange also proposes to
amend the names of these market data products in Exchange Rule
21.15(b).
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
[[Page 1648]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Market Data section of its fee
schedule applicable to EDGX Options to adopt fees for certain of its
market data products, which are currently offered free of charge. The
Exchange also proposes to amend the names of these market data products
in Exchange Rule 21.15(b).
The Exchange proposes to adopt fees for the following market data
products: EDGX Options Depth (currently referred to as Multicast
PITCH), EDGX Options Top (currently referred to Multicast Top), and
EDGX Options Auction Feed. Each of these market data products are
currently offered free of charge. The Exchange also proposes to amend
Rule 21.15(b) to revise the names of each of these market data
products.
Multicast Pitch, to be renamed as EDGX Options Depth, is a data
feed that offers depth of book quotations and execution information
based on options orders entered into the System.\3\ The Exchange offers
separate EDGX Options Depth data feeds for the Exchange's Simple Book
and the Exchange's Complex Order Book. The Exchange introduced Complex
Order Book functionality on October 23, 2017.\4\ The Exchange's Complex
Book is the EDGX Options electronic book of Complex Orders.\5\ The
Exchange's Simple Book is its regular electronic book of orders.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Exchange Rule 21.15(b)(1).
\4\ Exchange Rule 21.20. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 81891 (October 17, 2017), 82 FR 49058 (October 23, 2017)
(order approving the Exchange's proposal to adopt a complex order
book) (SR-BatsEDGX-2017-29).
\5\ Exchange Rule 21.20.(a)(6). A ``Complex Order'' is any order
involving the concurrent purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options in the same underlying security (the ``legs'' or
``components'' of the complex order), for the same account, in a
ratio that is equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333) and less
than or equal to three-to-one (3.00) and for the purposes of
executing a particular investment strategy. Exchange Rule
21.20(a)(5).
\6\ Exchange Rule 21.20(a)(10). See also Exchange Rule
16.1(a)(9) (defining the EDGX Options Book).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicast TOP, to be renamed as EDGX Options Top, is a data feed
that offers top of book quotations and execution information based on
options orders entered into the System.\7\ Like the EDGX Options Depth
feed, the Exchange offers separate EDGX Options Top data feeds for the
Exchange's Simple Book and the Exchange's Complex Order Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Exchange Rule 21.15(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Auction Feed, to be renamed the EDGX Options Auctions
Feed, is a data feed that provides information regarding the current
status of price and size information related to auctions conducted by
the Exchange.\8\ Like EDGX Options Depth and EDGX Options Top, the
Exchange offers separate EDGX Options Auction data feeds for the
Exchange's Simple Book and the Exchange's Complex Order Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Exchange Rule 21.15(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend its fee schedule to incorporate
fees for distribution of each of the above market data products to
subscribers. The proposed fees include the following, each of which are
described in detail below: (i) Distribution Fees for both Internal and
External Distributors; \9\ and (ii) Usage Fees for both Professional
\10\ and Non-Professional \11\ Users. The Exchange is proposing
identical Distribution and Users fees for each market data product
described above. Also, Distributors and Users of any one of the market
data products subject to this proposal may receive access to any or all
of the other market data products at no additional charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A ``Distributor'' is defined as ``any entity that receives
the Exchange Market Data product directly from the Exchange or
indirectly through another entity and then distributes it internally
or externally to a third party.'' See the Exchange's fee schedule
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/. An ``Internal Distributor'' is defined as ``a
Distributor that receives the Exchange Market Data product and then
distributes that data to one or more Users within the Distributor's
own entity.'' Id. An ``External Distributor'' is defined as ``a
Distributor that receives the Exchange Market Data product and then
distributes that data to a third party or one or more Users outside
the Distributor's own entity.'' Id.''
\10\ A ``Professional User'' is defined as ``any User other than
a Non-Professional User.'' See the Exchange's fee schedule available
at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/.
\11\ A ``Non-Professional User'' is defined as ``a natural
person who is not: (i) Registered or qualified in any capacity with
the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, any state
securities agency, any securities exchange or association, or any
commodities or futures contract market or association; (ii) engaged
as an ``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in Section
202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (whether or not
registered or qualified under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank
or other organization exempt from registration under federal or
state securities laws to perform functions that would require
registration or qualification if such functions were performed for
an organization not so exempt.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distribution Fees. As proposed, each Internal Distributor and
External Distributor that receives either the simple or complex
versions of EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and/or the EDGX
Options Auction Feed shall pay a fee of $500 per month.
User Fees. The Exchange proposes to charge Internal Distributors
and External Distributors that redistribute either the simple or
complex versions of EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and/or the
EDGX Options Auction Feed different fees for their Professional Users
and Non-Professional Users. The Exchange will assess a monthly fee for
Professional Users of $10.00 per User. Non-Professional Users will be
assessed a monthly fee of $1.00 per User.
Distributors that receive either the simple or complex versions of
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and/or the EDGX Options Auction
Feed will be required to count every Professional User and Non-
Professional User to which they provide the market data product(s), the
requirements for which are identical to that currently in place for
other market data products offered by the Exchange's equity trading
platform.\12\ Thus, the Distributor's count will include every person
and device that accesses the data regardless of the purpose for which
the individual or device uses the data. Distributors must report all
Professional and Non-Professional Users in accordance with the
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 74282 (February
18, 2015); 80 FR 9487 (February 23, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-09)
(proposing fees for the Bats One Feed); 75397 (July 8, 2015), 80 FR
41104 (July 14, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-28) (proposing user fees for the
EDGX Top and Last Sale data feeds); and 75788 (August 28, 2015), 80
FR 53364 (September 3, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-38) (proposing fees for
EDGX Book Viewer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with a Distributor's distribution of the
market data product, the Distributor should count as one User each
unique User that the Distributor has entitled to have access to the
market data product. However, where a device is dedicated specifically
to a single individual, the Distributor should count only the
individual and need not count the device.
The Distributor should identify and report each unique
User. If a User uses the same unique method to gain access to the
market data product, the Distributor should count that as one User.
However, if a unique User uses multiple methods to gain access to the
market data product (e.g., a single User has multiple passwords and
user identifications), the Distributor should report all of those
methods as an individual User.
Distributors should report each unique individual person
who receives access through multiple devices as one User so long as
each device is dedicated specifically to that individual.
If a Distributor entitles one or more individuals to use
the same device, the Distributor should include only the individuals,
and not the device, in the count.
[[Page 1649]]
The Exchange intends to implement the proposed changes to its fee
schedule on January 2, 2018.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\13\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\14\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its members and other recipients of
Exchange data. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all
recipients of Exchange data and that the proposed fees are competitive
with those charged by other venues and, therefore, reasonable and
equitably allocated to recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 11(A) of the Act \15\ in that it supports (i)
fair competition among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and
between exchange markets and markets other than exchange markets and
(ii) the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors of information
with respect to quotations for and transactions in securities.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 603 of
Regulation NMS,\16\ which provides that any national securities
exchange that distributes information with respect to quotations for or
transactions in an NMS stock do so on terms that are not unreasonably
discriminatory. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted
self-regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority
and flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It
was believed that this authority would expand the amount of data
available to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for
the provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
\16\ 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the proposed fees would not permit unfair
discrimination because all of the Exchange's customers and market data
vendors will be subject to the proposed fees on an equivalent basis.
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed
are distributed and purchased on a voluntary basis, in that neither the
Exchange nor market data distributors are required by any rule or
regulation to make this data available. Accordingly, Distributors and
Users can discontinue use at any time and for any reason, including due
to an assessment of the reasonableness of fees charged. Firms have a
wide variety of alternative market data products from which to choose,
such as similar proprietary data products offered by other exchanges
and consolidated data. Moreover, the Exchange is not required to make
any proprietary data products available or to offer any specific
pricing alternatives to any customers.
In addition, the fees that are the subject of this rule filing are
constrained by competition. As explained below in the Exchange's
Statement on Burden on Competition, the existence of alternatives to
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed
further ensures that the Exchange cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees
that are unreasonably discriminatory, when vendors and subscribers can
elect such alternatives. That is, the Exchange competes with other
exchanges (and their affiliates) that provide similar market data
products. If another exchange (or its affiliate) were to charge less to
distribute its similar product than the Exchange charges to distribute
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction
Feed, prospective Users likely would not subscribe to, or would cease
subscribing to, EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX
Options Auction Feed.
The Exchange notes that the Commission is not required to undertake
a cost-of-service or rate-making approach. The Exchange believes that,
even if it were possible as a matter of economic theory, cost-based
pricing for non-core market data would be so complicated that it could
not be done practically.
Distribution Fee. The Exchange believes that the proposed
Distribution Fees are also reasonable, equitably allocated, and not
unreasonably discriminatory. The fees for Members and non-Members are
uniform except with respect to reasonable distinctions with respect to
internal and external distribution, the fee for both are equal for each
of the market data products subject to this proposal. The Exchange
believes that the Distribution Fees for EDGX Options Depth, EDGX
Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed are reasonable and fair
in light of alternatives offered by other market centers. For example,
EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed
provides investors with alternative market data and competes with
similar market data product currently offered by Nasdaq PHLX LLC
(``PHLX''). Specifically, PHLX charges a fee of $5,000 per month to
External Distributors and $4,000 per month to Internal Distributors for
the TOPO Plus Orders feed,\17\ which included PHLX's complex order
book. PHLX also charges Internal Distributors $2,000 per month and
External Distributors $2,500 per month for the Top of PHLX Options,
which includes PHLX top of book data.\18\ PHLX charges Internal
Distributors $4,000 per month and External Distributors $4,500 per
month for the PHLX Depth Data, which includes PHLX depth of book
quotations.\19\ Each of these fees charged by PHLX are higher than that
proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See a description of TOPO Plus Orders available at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=topoplusorders. See also Section
IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees for the TOPO Plus Orders feed.
\18\ See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees for the Top
of PHLX Options feed.
\19\ See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees for the
PHLX Depth Data feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
User Fees. The Exchange believes that implementing the Professional
and Non-Professional User fees for EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options
Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed are equitable and reasonable
because they will result in greater availability to Professional and
Non-Professional Users. Moreover, introducing a modest Non-Professional
User fee for EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options
Auction Feed is reasonable because it provides an additional method for
retail investors to access EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and
the EDGX Options Auction Feed data by providing the same data that is
available to Professional Users. The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because
they will be charged uniformly to recipient firms and Users. The fee
structure of differentiated Professional and Non-Professional fees is
utilized by the Exchange for the Cboe One Feed and has long been used
by other exchanges for their proprietary data products, and by the
Nasdaq UTP and the CTA and CQ Plans in order to reduce the price of
data to retail investors and make it more broadly available.\20\
Offering EDGX
[[Page 1650]]
Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed to
Non-Professional Users with the same data available to Professional
Users results in greater equity among data recipients. The requirement
that Distributors count every Professional User and Non-Professional
User to which they provide the market data product(s) is also equitable
and reasonable because the requirements are identical to that currently
in place for other market data products offered by the Exchange's
equity trading platform.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 74285 (February
18, 2015), 80 FR 9828 (February 24, 2015) (SR-BATS-2015-11); 74283
(February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9809 (February 24, 2015) (SR-EDGA-2015-
09); 74282 (February 17, 2015), 80 FR 9487 (February 23, 2015) (SR-
EDGX-2015-09); and 74284 (February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9792 (February
24, 2015) (SR-BYX-2015-09). See also, e.g., Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 20002, File No. S7-433 (July 22, 1983) (establishing
nonprofessional fees for CTA data); and Nasdaq Rules 7023(b), 7047.
\21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 74282 (February
18, 2015); 80 FR 9487 (February 23, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-09)
(proposing fees for the Bats One Feed); 75397 (July 8, 2015), 80 FR
41104 (July 14, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-28) (proposing user fees for the
EDGX Top and Last Sale data feeds); and 75788 (August 28, 2015), 80
FR 53364 (September 3, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-38) (proposing fees for
EDGX Book Viewer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the proposed fees are reasonable when compared to
similar fees for comparable products offered by PHLX. Specifically,
PHLX charges a fee of $40 per month to professional users and $1.00 per
month to non-professional users of TOPO Plus Orders feed, Top of PHLX
Options, and PHLX Depth Data.\22\ Each of these fees charged by PHLX
are either equal to or higher than that proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Section IV of PHLX Rules outlining the fees for each of
these PHLX market data products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The
Exchange's ability to price EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and
the EDGX Options Auction Feed is constrained by: (i) Competition among
exchanges, other trading platforms, and Trade Reporting Facilities
(``TRF'') that compete with each other in a variety of dimensions; (ii)
the existence of inexpensive real-time consolidated data and market-
specific data and free delayed data; and (iii) the inherent
contestability of the market for proprietary data.
The Exchange and its market data products are subject to
significant competitive forces and the proposed fees represent
responses to that competition. To start, the Exchange competes
intensely for order flow. It competes with the other national
securities exchanges that currently trade equities, with electronic
communication networks, with quotes posted in FINRA's Alternative
Display Facility, with alternative trading systems, and with securities
firms that primarily trade as principal with their customer order flow.
In addition, EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX
Options Auction Feed compete with a number of alternative products. For
instance, EDGX Options Depth, EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options
Auction Feed do not provide a complete picture of all trading activity
in a security. Rather, the other national securities exchanges, the
several TRFs of FINRA, and Electronic Communication Networks (``ECN'')
that produce proprietary data all produce trades and trade reports.
Each is currently permitted to produce last sale information products,
and many currently do, including Nasdaq and NYSE. In addition, market
participants can gain access to EDGX Options last sale and depth-of-
book quotations, though integrated with the prices of other markets, on
feeds made available through the SIPs.
In sum, the availability of a variety of alternative sources of
information imposes significant competitive pressures on Exchange data
products and the Exchange's compelling need to attract order flow
imposes significant competitive pressure on the Exchange to act
equitably, fairly, and reasonably in setting the proposed data product
fees. The proposed data product fees are, in part, responses to that
pressure. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees would reflect an
equitable allocation of its overall costs to users of its facilities.
In addition, when establishing the proposed fees, the Exchange
considered the competitiveness of the market for proprietary data and
all of the implications of that competition. The Exchange believes that
it has considered all relevant factors and has not considered
irrelevant factors in order to establish fair, reasonable, and not
unreasonably discriminatory fees and an equitable allocation of fees
among all Users. The existence of alternatives to EDGX Options Depth,
EDGX Options Top, and the EDGX Options Auction Feed, including existing
similar feeds by other exchanges, consolidated data, and proprietary
data from other sources, ensures that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect these alternatives or choose not to
purchase a specific proprietary data product if its cost to purchase is
not justified by the returns any particular vendor or subscriber would
achieve through the purchase.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \23\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\24\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2017-010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number CboeEDGX-2017-010. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the
[[Page 1651]]
public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
CboeEDGX-2017-010 and should be submitted on or before February 2,
2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00413 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P